This invention relates to document scanners.
The invention is particularly applicable to large format document scanners, i.e. those for scanning documents of widths greater than approximately 11 inches (30 centimetres). Typically, a document scanner has an image detection system which obtains image data for a single image line, and a scanning mechanism for causing relative movement between the detection system and a document so as to cause the image line to be swept over the surface of the document. This captures data representative of a succession of scan lines for the document, which can be reconstructed to provide an image of the document.
The image detection system of a document scanner will include an image sensor unit having an array of detectors, for example charge coupled devices (CCDs) or CMOS detectors. In the course of manufacture of the devices, there is a risk of failure of the device which increases with the number of detectors in the array, so that sensor units with arrays of a large number of detectors are more expensive to manufacture than devices which have a smaller number of detectors in their arrays.
Consequently, it is known for large document scanners to use a number of image sensor units, each of which captures data for a respective portion of each scan line. In order to ensure that corresponding portions can be assembled to provide a single continuous scan line, it is known for the ends of neighbouring portions to overlap, so that each portion has a slight overlap with one or two other portions, dependent on whether the portion is from an end or the middle of the scan line.
In a known method of generating image data representative of the entire scan line from the data from a plurality of imaging devices, an initial and/or terminal portion of the image data from each device, corresponding to the slight overlap or overlaps, is discarded and the remainders of the image data are concatenated with one another.
A relatively compact and low cost image sensor unit that can be used as an imaging device is a contact image sensor (CIS). This type of device has a linear array of image detectors, such as charge coupled devices or CMOS devices, covering an area similar to the area of the scan line portion associated with the device. This correspondence between the area of the detectors and the area to be scanned by the device means that bulky and/or expensive optical scaling systems are not needed. However, the need for an overlap between neighbouring scan line portions requires that the contact image sensors are arranged in a physically overlapping relationship in the direction in which the documents are scanned. Because the detectors of the devices have operating circuitry that needs to be positioned adjacent to the detectors, there is a limit to the minimum distance between the adjacent scan line portions in the scanning direction.
This means that the scan line portions must be re-matched in the direction of scanning, either in the electronics of the scanner or in software. Any inconsistencies in the motion of the paper across the CIS units can result in an error in stitching the images front the CIS units together.
According to the invention, there is provided a document scanner comprising first and second image sensor units, each having an array of electromagnetic radiation detectors situated adjacent circuitry for operating the detectors; the scanner further comprising a scanning mechanism for causing relative movement between the detectors and a document to cause the detectors to scan the document along a scanning direction, the array of detectors of the first unit being situated ahead of the array of detectors of the second unit in said scanning direction, wherein the orientation of the detectors of the first unit with respect to their circuitry is the reverse of that of the detectors of the second unit, thereby to reduce the distance, in the scanning direction, between the two arrays.
Preferably, the arrays are linear arrays, each of which is operable to generate image data representative of a respective portion of each of a succession of scan lines of the document, wherein the areas imaged by the two arrays partially overlap.
In each unit, positioning the circuitry adjacent to the detectors, means that the array of detectors is generally offset, in a direction parallel to the scanning direction, towards one edge, the closer edge, of the unit. The or most of the circuitry is situated between the array and the unit's other, further edge. Conventionally, the units are arranged with the same orientation to each other, but since the units will overlap, the distance between the two arrays in the scanning direction cannot be less than the sum of the distance between one of the arrays and the respective further edge and the distance between the other array and the respective closer edge.
However, since one of the units of the scanner in accordance with the invention has a reversed orientation relative to the other unit, the two units can be placed in an overlapping configuration in which the distance between the two arrays of the detectors can be close to the sum of the distances between the arrays and their corresponding closer edges.
Preferably, the circuitry of each unit is situated wholly or substantially wholly to one side of the unit's linear array of detectors.
This feature allows the distance between each array and its respective closer edge to be minimised, and thus facilitates said reduction in the distance, in the scanning direction, between the arrays of detectors.
Conveniently, the circuitry for each unit is provided on a respective printed circuit board on which that unit's array of detectors is mounted.
Preferably, the circuitry for the detectors of the first unit is situated ahead of those detectors, in the scanning direction, whilst circuitry for the detectors of the second unit is situated behind that unit in the scanning direction.
It is within the scope of the invention for the scanning mechanism to move the units through the scanner in the scanning direction to scan the document held stationary thereon, but preferably the units are, in use, stationary with respect to the scanner, the scanning mechanism being operable to move the document past the detectors in the opposite direction to the scanning direction.
Preferably, each of the first and second units comprises a respective contact image sensor.
Such sensors have low power requirements and are relatively cheap and compact.
Preferably, the scanner has a common light source, for example a fluorescent tube or array of light emitting diodes, for providing illumination for the images detected by the contacting sensors.
The common light source avoids the need for each contact image sensor to have its own source, and therefore enables the sensors to be of a more compact design than conventional contact image sensors.
In addition, one disadvantage of using known contact image sensors (each of which has its own light source) is that the light source for one of the sensors may emit light of a different colour and/or intensity from the light emitted by the other source. This can lead to linear artefacts in the interface between the portions of the scanned image obtained by the two units. The human eye can be highly sensitive to such artefacts. However, if the units share a common light source, then sharp changes of intensity and/or colour of light at the interface can be avoided.
In that connection, if the source comprises an array of LEDs, it preferably also includes a diffuser for diffusing and mixing the light emitted by individual LEDs. Such a diffuser could, for example, form part of a light guide.
Preferably, each array of detectors has one or more associated lenses for focussing light from a respective imaging point onto each detector in the array. The lens or lenses of the first and second unit being angled towards a common line which is flanked by the two detector arrays and runs perpendicular to the scanning direction.
Thus, the lens or lenses of the first unit are angled rearwardly, whilst the lens or lenses of the second unit are angled forwardly with respect to the scanning direction, the lenses of the two units thus being toed in towards the common line so that the distance between the scan line portions, in the scanning direction, is less than that between the arrays of detectors.
Preferably, the orientation of the lenses is such that the image points for the sensors of both arrays lies substantially on the common line, which thus, in use, constitutes a common, continuous scan line of the document.
Preferably, where the detectors are arranged in linear arrays, the lens or lenses for each detector array comprise a respective linear array of rod lenses, each rod lens being associated with a respective detector.
The two units of the scanner may to advantage be two of three or more such units, the orientation of detectors of each unit, relative to their circuitry, being the reverse of that of its neighbouring unit or units and the positions or the units on the scanning direction alternating between a position corresponding to the position of the first unit, and a position corresponding to that of the second unit. Thus the units are arranged in a staggered configuration.
Two embodiments of scanner in accordance with the invention will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The known large format document scanner of
As can be seen from
As can be seen from
However, this delay cannot properly be taken into account if there is a variation in the movement of the document through the scanner, specifically as the portion of the document to be imaged by a scan line which has been partially captured by the sensors 4 and 8 then traverses the gap, the distance of which is indicated by the arrow 20 in the scanning direction between the lenses 8, 12 and the lenses 10. This can lead to stitching errors so that a document having a pattern as shown in
The risk of this sort of error occurring increases with the distance indicated by the arrow 20. However, the sensors under the lenses 8, 10 and 12 are mounted on circuit boards which extend to one side of the lenses and detectors, and under the light sources 14, 16 and 18. This means that the detectors and lenses are offset towards a closer edge of each unit (the edge referenced 26 in
With reference to
With reference to
The detectors 44 are situated beneath a linear rod lens array 48 constituted by a line of glass rods, each of which is in registry with a respective detector so as to direct light from a respective imaging point, such as the point 50, onto that detector. The size of each detector is substantially the same as the size of the associated imaging point, so that no reduction or magnification of the imaging points has to be performed by the lenses.
The sensors 32 and 34 are of identical construction to the sensor 30, and so are not described in detail. However, the lens array for the sensor 32 is denoted by reference numeral 49.
All three of the sensors are flanked by two common light sources 52 and 54, each of which is of a similar construction to the light sources used by conventional contact image sensors. In the present examples, each of the sources 52 and 52 comprises an arrangement or red, green and blue LEDs within an elongate light guide which conveys light from the LEDs along its length and also diffuses the light to give an even illumination of the light of different colours.
The light sources 52 and 54 provide illumination for each of the four scan lines of a document detected by the sensors 30, 32 and 34 acting in combination.
As with the contact image sensors of the conventional scanner, the lens arrays of the contact image sensors 30, 32 and 34 arc offset towards respective closer edges 56, 58 and 60 of the units. As can be seen from the Figures, the orientation of the sensor 30 is the reverse of that of the sensors 32 and 34, so that the portion 46 of the circuit board 42 is behind the array of detectors 44 in the scanning direction, whereas the corresponding portions of the circuit boards of the detectors 32 and 34 are ahead of the arrays of detectors of those sensors in the scanning direction. The sensors are thus orientated with the closer edges of neighbouring sensors facing each other in the areas where the sensors overlap. The imaging points of each array of detectors constitutes a respective imaging line from which data representative of a succession of scan line portions associated with the sensor is obtained. Reference numeral 62 denotes the axis of the imaging line associated with the sensor 30, whilst reference numeral 66 denotes the axis of the aligned imaging lines associated with the sensors 32 and 34. The arrow 64 indicates the difference between the lines 62 and 64 which, by virtue of the alternating orientation of the sensors is considerably shorter than the distance denoted by the arrow 20 i.e. the distance between the corresponding axes in the prior art scanner.
The scanner processes and combines the data of the sensors 30, 32 and 34 in the same way as happens with the prior art scanner, assembling a succession of scan lines for a document from the scan line portions captured by the sensors as the document passes through the scanner. However, since the distance between the imaging lines of the sensor 30 and those of the sensors 32 and 34 are much smaller than the corresponding distance associated with the prior art, the risk of errors in stitching together the portions is reduced.
Turning to
Thus, in this case, all portions of a given scan line are imaged simultaneously, and the risk of any errors in stitching together the portions is thereby minimised.
Typically, the angle between the arrays of rod lenses will be as small as possible (approximately 10 degrees), but is related to the focal distances and thicknesses of the lenses. The maximum permissible angle is only limited by reflection effects of the glass and illumination problems.
Each of the contact image sensors (CTS), of either embodiment, may be the size of standard A4 size CIS. The number of sensors provided in the scanner, in a staggered formation, is dependent upon the desired width of scan. Typically, five assemblies arranged in staggered, alternating orientation formation would be required for a scanner to provide a scan width of 40 inches.
It will be understood that other variations may be made to the scanners without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the two light sources could be replaced by a single light source on one side of the contact image sensors or by a respective on-board illumination system on each sensor.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2010/000755 | 5/27/2010 | WO | 00 | 1/14/2013 |