1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to a machine used for sorting documents, e.g. mail pieces such as letters, and more particularly relates to a sort machine having a feeder at each end of the machine to increase the sort capacity of the machine.
2. Background of the Invention
For several years, automated “sort machines” have been available which sort large volumes of documents (e.g. letters, postcards, checks, flats, and the like) into groups having a common identifying criteria (e.g. Zip Codes, mail boxes, etc.). A sort machine is typically comprised a “front end” or feeder section and one or more “stacker sections”. The front end feeds the pieces, one-by-one, past a reader (e.g. optical character reader (“OCR”), bar code reader (“BCR”), or the like) and onto a transport that carries it to a designated sort pocket in a stacker section(s).
As the piece passes the reader, the desired criteria on a piece is read and a signal is generated that, in turn, is processed to generate a designation signal for that particular piece. This designation signal, in turn, triggers a diverter or “gate” at the designated pocket in the stacker section as the piece approaches to divert the piece from the transport into the designated pocket where it is stacked with other pieces having the same identifying criteria. Such machines are well known and are commercially-available, e.g. Vsort® Flat Sort Machine, NP8000. Sort Machine, both manufactured and distributed by National Presort, Inc., Dallas, Tex.
Many present sort machines are comprised of a plurality of vertically stacked tiers of sort pockets which increase the number of pockets available during a sort operation without substantially increasing the machine's “foot print” (floor area required for the machine). In machines of this type, the letters are read and directed by a Level Distribution Unit or elevator system to the particular tier on which its respective sort pocket is located. For example, if a sort machine has four tiers, only approximately 25% of the letters being fed will go to each tiers. This means that approximately 75% of the sort capacity of each tier goes unutilized. It can be seen that if the unused capacity on each tier can be reduced, the throughput of the machine can be significantly increased.
The present invention provides a document sorting machine having dual feeders which feed documents onto common tiers of sort pockets from each end of the machine. The machine includes an induction buffer section which prevents a document already in the transport on a particular tier from colliding with a document being fed into the same transport by a feeder. Also, the machine includes a serpentine piggy-back unit which can stack documents going to the same sort pocket.
More specifically, the present invention provides a document sorting machine having an elongated stacker section which is comprised of at least one tier, preferably more than one, each tier having a transport extending therethrough. A plurality of sort pockets are positioned along the transport and are adapted to receive the documents as they are diverted from the transport. Two (i.e. dual) feeder sections, one at each end of the stacker section, simultaneously feed documents onto the respective transports from both of said ends of the sort machine.
An induction buffer unit is provided at each end of the elongated stacker section to prevent a document already on a transport (i.e. a document fed by one of the dual feeders) from colliding with a document being fed onto the same transport from the other of the dual feeders. Each induction buffer unit has a turn-around pulley in the transport which allows a document from a first feeder and already on the transport to reverse direction after it has traveled the length of one side of the tier so that the document can reach its final destination when its designated sort pocket lies along the other side of the tier. Since a document from the second feeder enters the transport of the same tier at a point just downstream of the turn-around pulley, any collision between documents will likely occur at this point.
To prevent any such collision, a purge pocket is provided along the transport just upstream of the turn-around pulley. When it is sensed that a collision between documents is imminent, a gate in the buffer unit is actuated to divert the document already on the transport into which the purge pocket by doing so, both feeders can continue to feed documents from both ends of the sorter without interruption.
The present sort machine also has a document stacking or piggy-back section for stacking documents going to the same sort pocket wherein the combined thickness of the stacked documents are within a predetermined range. This section includes a thickness measuring device for measuring the thicknesses of all of the documents as they pass through the section and a bypass transport. The bypass transport is adapted (a) to receive and temporarily hold the first of two consecutive documents to the same designated pocket and each having a thickness less than the predetermined thickness and (b) for returning said first document to said transport to thereby stack or piggy-back the first document onto a second document for final transport to their common pocket.
The actual construction operation, and apparent advantages of the present invention will be better understood by referring to the drawings, not necessarily to scale, in which like numerals identify like parts and in which:
While the invention will be described in connection with its preferred embodiments, it will be understood that this invention is not limited thereto. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents that may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.
Referring more particularly to the drawings,
Each half (A and B) is comprised of a feeder section 11 having a magazine 16 (
Stacker section 15 is shown as being comprised of a plurality (e.g. four) of vertically stacked tiers 22, each tier being substantially identical to the others. Each tier 22 has a plurality of horizontal stacker bins or “pockets” 20 (only some shown and numbered for clarity) arranged in pairs having one pocket on either side of the looped transport 12. As best seen in
Each pocket 20 has a diverter means (see 21a in
While the machine 10 will be shown and described as having four tiers 22, it should be recognized that more or less tiers (i.e. at least one) can be used without departing from the present invention. Also will be recognized, in most operations using multi-tiered sort machines, the sorting of the mail will be programmed to arrange the sort pockets so that each tier will receive approximately an equal amount of the documents. For example, in a four-tier machine, the designated pockets for a particular batch of documents will be assigned so that approximately 25% of the documents will be fed to each tier, leaving appropriate 75% of the available transport capacity of that tier unused.
In accordance with the present invention, dual feeders 11 are provided to feed documents onto transport 12 from opposite ends of the sort machine 10. That is, one feeder 11A reads and feeds documents from one end of the sorter 10 through its respective LDU 14 to each of the four tiers 22 while, at the same time, feeder 11B reads and feeds documents from the other end of the elongated sort machine 10.
As described above, a document 17 fed from either feeder 11A or 11B may have to travel almost all of the way around the looped transport 12 of a respective tier 22 in order to reach a designated pocket 20 which lies on the other side of the stacker section from which the document entered the transport. In order to do this, that document must travel completely through both stacker sections 15 along one side of the tier and then reverse directions at “turn around” pulley 23 in a respective induction buffer unit 30 before it can travel along the other side of the tier to reach its designated pocket.
Since documents 17 are being fed simultaneously from both feeders 11A and 11B onto respective ends of the respective common looped transport 12 of each respective tier 22, there is a real possibility that a document from one of the feeders and already in the transport may collide with a document being fed onto the transport by the other feeder; thereby causing a collision between the two documents. Any such collisions are likely to cause jamming in the transport that will result in a shut-down of sort operations to clear the jam. To prevent this from happening, an induction buffer unit 30 is provided at each end of each tier 22. Since the buffer units 30 are identical, only the unit at one end (i.e. 30B) will be described in detail.
As best seen in
If a following document 17A is positioned on transport 12 so that it might run up onto the document 17B as it is being delayed in unit 30, gate G is actuated to divert document 17A into a “purge” pocket 20P. Any documents in purge pocket 20P are then removed and ran back through sort machine 10 to sort them into their proper pockets. This allows both feeders to continue to feed documents without interruption.
Another feature of the present invention is serpentine piggy-back unit 13 (
In the operation of serpentine, piggy-back unit 13, the thickness of each document 17D (
When the following document 17D2 (which is going to the same pocket as document 17D1) approaches the exit of bypass transport 12T, document 17D1 is fed (i.e. piggy-backed) onto document 17D2. The two stacked documents will now travel along transport 12 as if a single document until it reaches its designated pocket and is sorted accordingly.
The present application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/191,572, filed Sep. 10, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3905896 | Jackson et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4140627 | Weller et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4488610 | Yankloski | Dec 1984 | A |
5363971 | Weeks et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5419457 | Ross et al. | May 1995 | A |
5689795 | Mastrandrea | Nov 1997 | A |
6561360 | Kalm et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6676127 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7004396 | Quine et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7170024 | Burns et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7414218 | Wheeler et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7868264 | Stemmle et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20030038065 | Pippin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050247606 | Redford et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070084764 | Benninger | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070209976 | Worth et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080041770 | Mileaf et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2006110486 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61191572 | Sep 2008 | US |