1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains generally to the field of animal husbandry, and more particularly to protective dog boots.
2. Description of the Related Art
Dogs have long been known as “man's best friend”. These animals serve very diverse functions, providing companionship, guarding, towing, hunting, and even sensory conversion, such as a seeing eye-dog, a hearing-assist dog, and even a police or military dog. Regardless of the relationship between person and dog, at various times, and for many diverse reasons, it may be highly desirable for the dog owner to place boots upon the dog's paws. For example, in inclement weather, a person may not wish to try to clean a dog's paws after the dog has been outside. Boots that may be placed and then readily removed may be much easier to use than what might be required to thoroughly clean the dog's feet. In other instances, a dog may have injured one or more paws, and so may not have the usual toughness. In such case, a suitable boot may help to protect the affected paw until sufficient healing has occurred to no longer require the boot. In other cases, the dog's pads may be inadequate for traversing the ground when temperatures are particularly severe, such as in colder climates or with dogs that are not adapted to the cold, or conversely in extremely hot climates where the ground surface may be scorching. Racing and sled dogs may be exposed to a particularly harsh course or environment, and so may also need special protection. Boots can be used to prevent snow from getting up between the pads of the foot, freezing, abrading the soft tissue, and thereby producing a lame dog.
A number of artisans have recognized one or more of the foregoing needs, and so have designed various dog boots. One such patent which exemplifies these known boots is U.S. Pat. No. 6,526,920 by Griffin, entitled “Dog boot for hunting and other outdoor activities,” the teachings which are incorporated herein by reference. This patent describes dog boots having a zipper and dual hook-and-loop leg fasteners with loops for tightening, and a non-skid sole. Additional patents that offer useful teachings and insights are incorporated by reference, including U.S. Pat. No. Des. 387,511 by Caditz; U.S. Pat. No. 5,495,828 by Solomon et al; U.S. Pat. No. 5,408,812 by Stark; U.S. Pat. No. 6,186,097 by Brockmann et al; U.S. Pat. No. Des. 379,251 by Mezey; U.S. Pat. No. 5,148,657 by Stafford et al; U.S. Pat. No. 5,452,685 by Thomas; U.S. Pat. No. 2,064,566 by Richman; U.S. Pat. No. 2,424,172 by Huddleston; U.S. Pat. No. 2,651,853 by Lewis; U.S. Pat. No. 3,762,073 by Cantales; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,457,261 and 4,543,911 by Marshall; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,470,832 by Peacock.
However, these prior art boots tend to suffer from several common limitations. As may be recognized, prior art dog boots are often very difficult to put on the dog's foot. This problem will be intensified by the fact that most dogs will not remain still while a person is trying to put the boot on. Once on, these prior art boots do not stay on well. Many will simply spin about, potentially causing much discomfort or harm to the dog. Others will slide off as the dog walks or runs, much like loose socks coming off of a person walking on carpet. This phenomenon is quite significant, since the boot must be designed to be of non-slip material, or the dog will sprawl on finished wood, icy or other relatively slippery surfaces. Yet, the boot must also preferentially stay on the dog's paw, rather than slide with respect thereto, even when the booted dog is traversing terrain having good traction. Simply applying more force about the dog's leg to keep the boot on has proven to be totally unsatisfactory, since circulation within the leg may become limited or disrupted. Unintended bunching of the boot top can be harder to detect, and can also restrict circulation. Yet, different dogs will have significantly different proportions between pad size and leg diameter, meaning that the boot must be very adjustable to accommodate different dog breeds and sizes. Finally, complex boots are not only more difficult to put on the dog, but they are also much more expensive to produce, which is also undesirable.
In a first manifestation, the invention is a dog boot, suitable for insertion and removal of a dog paw and providing an operatively protective covering about the dog paw. The dog boot is fabricated from a generally tubular body member having a closed end and an open end. A pair of opposed slits are provided adjacent to the open end that define a first flare and a second flare and allow the first flare and the second flare to expand beyond a balance of the generally tubular body member, which facilitates insertion of a dog paw therein. A means is also provided adjacent the expanding means for contracting the open end from an open dog paw receiving position to a contracted dog paw retaining position. At least one cushion is located on an interior of the open end, and is affixed to a first one of the first and second flares and extends less than from a one of the pair of opposed slits to another of the pair of opposed slits when the open end is operatively contracted. The first and second flares overlap adjacent the open end when the open end is operatively contracted to the contracted dog paw retaining position. The first flare terminates prior to overlapping with the at least one cushion when the open end is operatively contracted to the contracted dog paw retaining position.
In a second manifestation, the invention is a dog boot suitable for insertion and removal of a dog's leg and paw and operatively providing protective covering about the dog paw. An operatively protective covering has a closed end and an open end and defines a dog paw region operative to surround the dog's paw, and defines a dog leg region operative to surround the dog's leg. The dog paw region is located adjacent to the closed end and has a ground engaging surface. The dog leg region is located adjacent to the open end. A means is provided for contracting the dog leg region. At least one interference-producing cushion has a foam core and an outer layer formed thereon. The at least one interference producing cushion is located on an interior of the dog leg region and protrudes interiorly from the operatively protective covering above and immediately adjacent to the dog paw region ground engaging surface, and is operative to produce interference with the dog's paw and thereby resist the dog leg region sliding into contact with the dog's paw.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention solve inadequacies of the prior art by providing a breathable fabric substrate, preferably of durable material such as heavy nylon, onto which friction pads, wear pads, tensioning straps, and strategically located cushions are attached. Specially configured slits ensure that a wide range of leg sizes relative to paw sizes may be accommodated, while easing application of the boot and eliminating any risk of bunching during such application.
A first object of the invention is to provide a dog boot which is readily placed about a dog's paw. A second object of the invention is securement of the boot against slippage, spin or separation with respect to the dog's leg, while simultaneously substantially reducing the risk of circulatory disruption or harm to the dog. Another object of the present invention is to ensure that the boot will readily accommodate a wide range of proportions of paw size to leg diameter. A further object of the invention is to provide a boot which is substantially non-slip with respect to a surface the dog is traversing. Yet another object of the invention is to provide a more readily produced boot which is not unnecessarily complex or expensive to produce, and yet which is durable. An even further object of the invention is that the boot float for water usage. Another object of the invention is that the boot not unduly abrade the dog during use.
The foregoing and other objects, advantages, and novel features of the present invention can be understood and appreciated by reference to the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Manifested in the preferred embodiment boot 1, the present invention fulfills the objectives set forth herein above and others. As shown in
A second layer of material 11 may either extend from or be parallel to and continue beyond surface 12, or, when surface 12 is completely omitted, instead of surface 12. Material 11 will most preferably be relatively soft, compliant, durable, strong, and resistant to the elements. Standard nylon, ballistic nylon, or Cordura™ is most preferred for this substrate, owing to the inherent durability, ready fabrication, and permeability to gasses, while still providing some water resistance. In the preferred embodiment, material 11 extends from toe 17 to flare terminations 16, and is laminated with surface 12 by simple edge stitching.
A similar material will also be used in the fabrication of boot top 20, as material 21. With somewhat larger exposed surface area, the breathable nature of a woven or non-woven fabric will be very beneficial in many applications. A protective patch 22 will preferably be laminated with material 21. As shown in the preferred embodiment boot 1, protective patch 22 serves as a toe patch, which is particularly beneficial when a dog, for whatever reason, has a tendency to drag the toe. Protective patch 22 will help prevent serious damage to boot 1 as well as to the dog's foot. This patch in the preferred embodiment is preferably a stronger, more abrasion resistant material, and so may be Cordura™ or ballistic nylon, or other relatively more abrasion resistant material. Waterproofing may also be applied, if desired.
Strap 30, which is relatively close to the open end 2 of boot 1, would potentially slip above open end 2, and so become less effective. To prevent such slippage from occurring, a small closed loop 13 is provided at the top back of boot 1, adjacent open end 2. While in the preferred embodiment, only strap 30 passes through loop 13, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that both straps 30 and 40 could pass through. Nevertheless, in the preferred embodiment boot 1, the operation of strap 40 is not as well suited to passing through loop 13, and so, in the preferred embodiment and subject to review for each new design incorporating the present invention, it does not do so.
Most preferably, boot 1 will be dimensioned to cooperate with the intrinsic geometry of a dog paw. In this regard, it is noted that most dog paws are slightly wider at the pad than they are in the leg region slightly above and immediately adjacent the pad. Consequently, with reasonable sizing and placement, cushion 14 will be placed on the leg adjacent the dog's pad, and strap 40 will secure cushion 14 in that position. Such placement ensures that the bulge at the dog's pad will produce interference with cushion 14, thereby preventing cushion 14 from sliding down into the dog's pad region.
To further advance this effect, it is quite desirable to cut at least cushioning pad 14 and optionally cut cushioning pad 24 at different angles than perpendicular on edges adjacent open end 2, while keeping these edges perpendicular adjacent the dog's pad, as may be best viewed in the enlarged sectional view of
In the most preferred embodiment, cushioning pads 14, 24 may comprise one or more of a variety of foams and foam rubbers, though closed cell polyurethane and neoprene are preferred, for their combination of low cost, ready availability, water resistance, and high coefficient of friction with many surfaces and materials. This latter coefficient of friction will help to ensure that boot 1 stays in place without requiring excessive forces be applied to straps 30, 40. In one exemplary and non-limiting alternative embodiment, another suitable material with similar characteristic is a silicone rubber, such as a low durometer RTV composition. In another alternative embodiment, a suitable material is a gel, whether formulated from silicone or other elastic, viscoelastic, elastomeric, or other composition. In a further alternative embodiment illustrated for exemplary purposes in
Depending upon the relative friction between the dog leg and boot 1, other devices may be used which serve to contract open end 2. Such devices are too numerous to specifically mention herein, but can include elastic materials, and even resilient and elastic fabrics commonly found in the apparel industry.
Opposite to toe end 17 there is a flare which begins at points 15 and narrows with increasing distance from toe end 17 and closed end 3 to the end points 16. In contrast, the top and front 20 has an opposite flare which widens with increasing distance from toe end 17 and closed end 3 to the end points 26, and also includes the chamfer adjacent closed end 3 which forms rounded toe end 27. Cushion 24 will still most preferably be placed adjacent to straps 30, 40, but will, like pad 14, not extend the full width of the rectangular shape of top and front 20.
Boot 1 consists of both top and front 20 and bottom 10. In the preferred embodiment, these two components are assembled by stitching at a perimeter therebetween, though many other known manufacturing equivalents exist and are contemplated herein, including for exemplary purposes only and not limited thereto, thermal bonding, chemical bonding, and adhesive bonding.
Rather than stitching the entire perimeter, which would fully close boot 1, stitching will stop at points 15, and not extend beyond towards points 16. This means that two opposed slits have been formed adjacent points 16, most preferably in the region over which straps 30, 40 travel. The slits thus formed provide overlap without bunching, and the fact that cushions 14, 24 do not form an entire circumference means that straps 30, 40 may be tightened about a wider range of dog legs without any fear of bunching than was possible in the prior art. Yet, and as aforementioned, cushions 14, 24 will ensure good contact with a dog's leg. The shapes illustrated in
Preferred embodiment boot 1 as illustrated in
By using closed cell foam for pads 14, 24, boot 1 has the ability to float in water, which is an advantage when a boot comes off the dog in water. Unfortunately, the effects of water, muck and the like may still exert forces that are greater than the boot can otherwise resist. Hook and loop fasteners or a similar product are used to make up the fastening system comprised by straps 30, 40. The top strap 30 is a simple hook and loop fastening system preferably placed near the top of boot 1. The bottom strap 40 uses a plastic loop 43 to increase leverage and holding power. Strap 40 goes around the back of boot 1, through loop 43, and reverses direction to come back to the front of boot 1. This allows a person to use leverage when tightening strap 40. This strap 40, along with cushions 14, 24 underneath straps 30, 40, ensures boot 1 will stay on the dog under the most severe conditions, including but not limited to mud, water, snow, heavy brush and the like.
As may be understood, these preferred embodiment booties have many uses, including keeping a dog's feet clean when outside, to protect hunting dog's feet from thorns and burrs, and, when walking them, to protect dog's feet from chemicals and severe cold in the winter, and severe heat in the summer Additionally, while the preferred embodiment describes application to dogs in accord with the requirement for enablement, those skilled in animal husbandry will recognize that the present invention will have application to other animals having similar paw and leg anatomy. Consequently, while the foregoing details what is felt to be the preferred embodiment of the invention, no material limitations to the scope of the claimed invention are intended. Further, features and design alternatives that would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art are considered to be incorporated herein. The scope of the invention is set forth and particularly described in the claims herein below.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. utility application Ser. No. 13/396,595 filed Feb. 14, 2012 and granted as U.S. Pat. No. 9,497,932 on Nov. 22, 2016, which is a Continuation of U.S. utility application Ser. No. 12/719,847 filed Mar. 8, 2010 and granted as U.S. Pat. No. 8,113,152 on Feb. 14, 2012, which is in turn a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. utility application Ser. No. 10/980,085 filed Nov. 2, 2004 and granted as U.S. Pat. No. 7,971,557 on Jul. 5, 2011, which in turn claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/517,112 filed Nov. 3, 2003, each naming the present inventors, the contents of each which are incorporated herein by reference in entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
295712 | Anderson | Mar 1884 | A |
630310 | Agnew | Aug 1899 | A |
866423 | Bellatty | Sep 1907 | A |
1354972 | Hess | Oct 1920 | A |
1595834 | Griffiths | Aug 1926 | A |
1656564 | Lyon | Jan 1928 | A |
1687459 | Lyon | Oct 1928 | A |
1687460 | Lyon | Oct 1928 | A |
1772827 | Caster-Udell | Aug 1930 | A |
1854183 | Fallon, Jr. | Apr 1932 | A |
1911956 | Jennings | May 1933 | A |
1961345 | Fallon, Jr. | Jun 1934 | A |
2004117 | Jennings | Jun 1935 | A |
2064566 | Richman | Dec 1936 | A |
2201382 | Vizard | May 1940 | A |
2222705 | Conlon | Nov 1940 | A |
2408650 | Jennings | Oct 1946 | A |
2417803 | De Mar | Mar 1947 | A |
2424172 | Huddleston | Jul 1947 | A |
2443831 | Miller | Jun 1948 | A |
2446371 | McNeill Jones | Aug 1948 | A |
2535394 | Davis | Dec 1950 | A |
2651853 | Lewis | Sep 1953 | A |
2700231 | Vizard | Jan 1955 | A |
2754600 | Vizard | Jul 1956 | A |
2937487 | Dever | May 1960 | A |
3150641 | Kesh | Sep 1964 | A |
3286375 | Troy | Nov 1966 | A |
3304630 | Sherbrook | Feb 1967 | A |
3742679 | Jordan | Jul 1973 | A |
3747565 | Kellam | Jul 1973 | A |
3762073 | Cantales | Oct 1973 | A |
D229197 | Jackson | Nov 1973 | S |
3791383 | Friedman | Feb 1974 | A |
3794119 | Paiso et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
4457261 | Marshall | Jul 1984 | A |
4458431 | Sinclair | Jul 1984 | A |
4543911 | Marshall | Oct 1985 | A |
4548026 | Shidner | Oct 1985 | A |
4633817 | Taylor | Jan 1987 | A |
4744333 | Taylor | May 1988 | A |
4931773 | Rosen | Jun 1990 | A |
4967542 | MacDonald | Nov 1990 | A |
5014041 | Rosen | May 1991 | A |
5076043 | Butler | Dec 1991 | A |
5137508 | Engman | Aug 1992 | A |
5148657 | Stafford et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5209048 | Hanson | May 1993 | A |
5211672 | Andujar | May 1993 | A |
5341765 | McComb | Aug 1994 | A |
5359963 | Jesse, Jr. et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5385036 | Spillane | Jan 1995 | A |
5408812 | Stark | Apr 1995 | A |
5452685 | Thomas | Sep 1995 | A |
5490337 | Zerbinati | Feb 1996 | A |
5495828 | Solomon | Mar 1996 | A |
D379251 | Mezey | May 1997 | S |
5633064 | Ragland et al. | May 1997 | A |
5658634 | Ragland et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5676095 | Ralls | Oct 1997 | A |
D387511 | Caditz | Dec 1997 | S |
5715661 | Meyers | Feb 1998 | A |
5813144 | Prengler | Sep 1998 | A |
5926843 | Winchester | Jul 1999 | A |
5937542 | Bourdeau | Aug 1999 | A |
5983526 | Pawlik | Nov 1999 | A |
5996255 | Ventura | Dec 1999 | A |
6024055 | Jesse, Sr. et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6089194 | Labelle | Jul 2000 | A |
6186097 | Brockmann et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6226898 | Trimble et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240882 | Gross | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6319864 | Hannigan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6470832 | Peacock | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6526920 | Griffin | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546704 | Fisher | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564475 | Collins et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6564753 | Heileg et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6786029 | Kuzuu | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6851394 | Young | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6863033 | Fleming | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6931767 | Royle | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6973742 | Gordon | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7174858 | Ford | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185612 | Faulk | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7677206 | Southworth | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7971557 | Paxton | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7975656 | Prill | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8109241 | Wrenwood Maloney et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8113152 | Paxton et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8161668 | Ketzenberg et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8176880 | Hurwitz | May 2012 | B2 |
8424495 | Rivera-Brutto | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8567350 | Wrenwood Maloney et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8621765 | Geer et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8677944 | Kissel, Jr. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
D702893 | Tullo | Apr 2014 | S |
9485962 | Paxton et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20030115777 | Hall | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050188925 | Yun et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070039565 | Krottinger | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044734 | Maloney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070175409 | Vogelman | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070175410 | Vogelman | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080264351 | Williams | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090012490 | Winqvist | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090266310 | Behme | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110041779 | Hurwitz | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110041780 | Hurwitz | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110277702 | Taslakian | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20140150299 | Entler | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174379 | Kissel, Jr. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140318478 | Cruz | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2486628 | Jun 2015 | CA |
200371823 | Jan 2005 | KR |
WO 2009120723 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60517112 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12719847 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13396595 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13396595 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 15359502 | US | |
Parent | 10980085 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 12719847 | US |