The present disclosure relates generally to glass sheets and glass substrates and methods for fabricating glass sheets and glass substrates. More particularly, it relates to glass substrates for hard disk drives and methods for fabricating glass substrates using a glass making process or system, such as with a glass drawing apparatus.
It has been over sixty years since the introduction of the first magnetic recording hard disk drive (HDD) designed and manufactured by IBM in 1956. The drive capacity was about 4.4 MB, which was the same as the first personal computer hard drives that appeared in the early 1980's. Currently, HDDs with storage capacity on the order of 10 TB are available and are used in modern computer systems. With the advent of new technologies, the cost per drive and the physical size of a drive have been reduced significantly. The combination of these prominent developments has made an ever-increasing demand for HDDs in the market.
HDDs store information on platters which consist of a thick non-magnetic substrate with thin ferromagnetic film coatings. There are two predominant hard disk drive form factors: 2.5″ (65 mm) that typically use glass substrates and 3.5″ (95 mm) that typically use aluminum substrates. Price pressure on HDDs from solid state drives is forcing HDD manufacturers to find ways to reduce the cost per TB of drives. The two most promising methods to reduce cost are to increase the number of platters per drive and to increase the areal density (TB/in2) of the platters. Increasing the number of platters requires the use of thinner platters to maintain a constant drive form factor. In that case, it is desirable to increase the stiffness of the substrate material to offset the reduction in stiffness due to thickness reduction. This is one factor driving HDD manufacturers to consider glass in 95 mm HDDs. Increasing the areal density requires the use of a new magnetic thin films technology called heat assisted magnetic recording (HAMR). This technology requires high temperature (e.g., greater than 600° C.) annealing of the magnetic thin films during deposition. Aluminum substrates cannot be used for HAMR due to the high process temperatures. This is also driving the adoption of glass substrates for 95 mm HDD applications.
There are many attributes which are relevant to disk performance in HDDs. For example, flatness is of relevance as the number of disks in a HDD assembly increases, platter thickness and spacing become much smaller. Thinner platters have much less flexural stiffness and are more likely to fail during handling and in the operational state. Any warp (i.e., out of plane distortion) of the substrate will amplify the dynamic response of the platter during operation and increase the risk of read/write errors due to misregistration of the read/write head relative to the track within which information is being written/read. In a worst case scenario, the head may “crash” into the disk resulting in catastrophic failure of the HDD. One of the dominant factors to increase the areal density is to reduce the track width so that more tracks can be written in the same disk radius. As track width decreases, the sensitivity of the drive to out of plane distortion of the platters increases. Therefore, it is expected that read and write errors will increase with increasing areal density and thinner platters without a tight restriction on the disk flatness.
Conventional glass hard disk substrates are manufactured by a multistep process involving the following basic steps: (1) press-molding a glass puck, (2) shaping the puck into a disk “blank” using core drilling and edge scribing/grinding, (3) lapping the surface of the blank to reduce its thickness to near the final desired thickness, (4) chamfering and edge polishing the blank, (5) lapping the blank in one or more steps to further reduce the thickness of the blanks and eliminate surface damage from the previous steps, and (6) polishing the blank to achieve a surface roughness that is sufficiently low to enable the deposition of smooth magnetic films. The press molded puck thickness is typically greater than 1 mm which requires several lapping steps to reduce the thickness to a target thickness of less than 0.7 mm, so it is difficult to produce substrates economically by this method. Precise control of the blank shape is also difficult to achieve by press molding or to maintain during such significant material removal.
Thus, there is a need in the art to provide a high performance glass disk for HDDs and to provide an improved process to achieve such high performance glass disks.
Some embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a glass sheet. The glass sheet includes a first major surface, a second major surface opposite to the first major surface, and an edge surface extending between the first major surface and the second major surface. The glass sheet includes a thickness between 0.3 mm and 2 mm. The glass sheet includes a dome or bowl shape.
Yet other embodiments of the present disclosure relate to an annular glass substrate. The annular glass substrate includes a first major surface, a second major surface opposite to the first major surface, and an edge surface extending between the first major surface and the second major surface. The annular glass substrate includes a thickness between 0.3 mm and 2 mm. The annular glass substrate includes a dome or bowl shape.
Yet other embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a method for processing glass. The method includes forming a ribbon of molten glass in a draw direction. The method includes controlling temperature gradients in a setting zone of the ribbon in the draw direction and transverse to the draw direction to shape the ribbon into a dome or bowl shape. The method includes cutting the ribbon to form a glass sheet comprising the dome or bowl shape.
Embodiments described herein provide an exemplary substrate disk shape to minimize the out of plane distortion of a platter during operation of a HDD. Embodiments described herein also provide an exemplary full sheet shape from which such disks can be cut efficiently. Additional embodiments also provide a fusion forming process by which such full sheets can be obtained. Such embodiments can enable low cost manufacturing of HDD substrates with performance advantages for designs employing thin platters or HAMR technology. It should be noted that typical fusion processes do not produce a sheet with the desired intrinsic shape. Rather, typical fusion processes may require that the full sheet warp and edge/corner gradients be controlled, so warp on the length scales required for HDD applications is generally ignored.
Embodiments described herein and claimed can enable the maximization of areal density of a disk by reducing out of plane distortion of the disk during operation which in turn allows minimization of the head/disk spacing. As HDD manufacturers drive to thinner platters the need to minimize out of plane distortion due to substrate shape increases.
A glass sheet from which glass substrates possessing the exemplary shape can be cut is advantageous because it enables lower cost manufacturing. Fusion sheet processing as described herein is advantaged versus conventional press/mold processing because fusion sheets can be made with a thickness that is closer to the target thickness and the fusion surface has low roughness and is free of defects induced by contact with rollers, molds, tin bath, or the like.
Additional features and advantages will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the embodiments described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description describe various embodiments and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the claimed subject matter. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the various embodiments, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate various embodiments described herein, and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operations of the claimed subject matter.
Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of the present disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Whenever possible, the same reference numerals will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. However, this disclosure may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein.
Ranges can be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
Directional terms as used herein—for example up, down, right, left, front, back, top, bottom, vertical, horizontal—are made only with reference to the figures as drawn and are not intended to imply absolute orientation.
Unless otherwise expressly stated, it is in no way intended that any method set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps be performed in a specific order, nor that with any apparatus, specific orientations be required. Accordingly, where a method claim does not actually recite an order to be followed by its steps, or that any apparatus claim does not actually recite an order or orientation to individual components, or it is not otherwise specifically stated in the claims or description that the steps are to be limited to a specific order, or that a specific order or orientation to components of an apparatus is not recited, it is in no way intended that an order or orientation be inferred, in any respect. This holds for any possible non-express basis for interpretation, including: matters of logic with respect to arrangement of steps, operational flow, order of components, or orientation of components; plain meaning derived from grammatical organization or punctuation, and; the number or type of embodiments described in the specification.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a” component includes aspects having two or more such components, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
As used herein, “molten glass” shall be construed to mean a molten material which, upon cooling, can enter a glassy state. The term molten glass is used synonymously with the term “melt”. The molten glass may form, for example, a majority silicate glass, although the present disclosure is not so limited.
Referring now to
An exemplary optimal disk shape for HDD operation produced from a fusion forming process has been determined. The Young's modulus for the disk has been determined to be between about 80 GPa and 86 GPa (e.g., 83 GPa). The Poisson's ratio for the disk has been determined to be between about 0.20 and 0.26 (e.g., 0.23). The density of the disk has been determined to be between about 2500 kg/m3 and 2700 kg/m3 (e.g., 2590 kg/m3). The disk has a thickness between about 0.3 mm and 2 mm (e.g., 0.7 mm) or between about 0.3 mm and 0.7 mm, an inner diameter between about 20 mm and 30 mm (e.g., 25 mm), and an outer diameter between about 60 mm and 100 mm (e.g., 67 mm, 95 mm). Under an operational state, disk 108 is spinning at various speeds clamped between spacers 106.
To determine an optimal target disk shape, the disk shape can be characterized by a second order polynomial function of x- and y-Cartesian coordinates of the circular disk. Taking into consideration a fusion forming process and simplifying the optimization process, the second order terms can be kept as shown in Equation 1 below. The coefficients A and B are defined as design variables and are fine tuned in this disclosure.
Z=Ax
2
+By
2 1
The deformed shapes under gravity and clamping force (e.g., due to spacers) corresponding to the four shapes of
Results from a free vibration analysis indicated that warp has a negligible effect on the natural frequencies and vibration modes. These dynamic quantities are directly related to the out-of-plane disk vibration response. Thus, it was determined that the optimal solution found in Equation 2 was indeed optimal under both operational state and disk vibration induced by air turbulence.
Cutting fusion formed glass sheets into smaller parts allows some relief of the in-plane stress generated by the thermal history that a glass ribbon experiences. As this in-plane stress is relieved to very small magnitudes, the “intrinsic” shape captured in the glass begins to dominate the resultant shape of small glass pieces through the local curvature. In this manner, the intrinsic shape is set into the glass inside the “setting zone,” which is bounded by the temperatures at which the instantaneous coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) is changing at a much lower rate. To produce a glass sheet from a fusion forming process, the glass sheet should have a similar curvature as the optimal disks that will be cut out.
With reference to these figures it can be observed that as the shape of the glass ribbon inside the setting zone (
In some embodiments, melting furnace 212 may be incorporated as a component of a glass manufacturing apparatus configured to fabricate a glass article, for example a glass ribbon of an indeterminate length, although in further embodiments, the glass manufacturing apparatus may be configured to form other glass articles without limitation, such as glass rods, glass tubes, glass envelopes (for example, glass envelopes for lighting devices, e.g., light bulbs) and glass lenses, although many other glass articles are contemplated. In some examples, the melting furnace may be incorporated as a component of a glass manufacturing apparatus comprising a slot draw apparatus, a float bath apparatus, a down draw apparatus (e.g., a fusion down draw apparatus), an up draw apparatus, a pressing apparatus, a rolling apparatus, a tube drawing apparatus or any other glass manufacturing apparatus that would benefit from the present disclosure. By way of example,
Glass manufacturing apparatus 210 (e.g., fusion down draw apparatus 210) can optionally include an upstream glass manufacturing apparatus 216 positioned upstream relative to glass melting vessel 214. In some examples, a portion of, or the entire upstream glass manufacturing apparatus 216, may be incorporated as part of the glass melting furnace 212. As shown in the embodiment illustrated in
Glass manufacturing apparatus 210 can also optionally include a downstream glass manufacturing apparatus 230 positioned downstream of glass melting furnace 212 relative to a flow direction of the molten glass 228. In some examples, a portion of downstream glass manufacturing apparatus 230 may be incorporated as part of glass melting furnace 212. However, in some instances, first connecting conduit 232 discussed below, or other portions of the downstream glass manufacturing apparatus 230, may be incorporated as part of the glass melting furnace 212.
Downstream glass manufacturing apparatus 230 can include a first conditioning (i.e. processing) vessel, such as fining vessel 234, located downstream from melting vessel 214 and coupled to melting vessel 214 by way of the above-referenced first connecting conduit 232. In some examples, molten glass 228 may be gravity fed from melting vessel 214 to fining vessel 234 by way of first connecting conduit 232. For instance, gravity may drive molten glass 228 through an interior pathway of first connecting conduit 232 from melting vessel 214 to fining vessel 234. It should be understood, however, that other conditioning vessels may be positioned downstream of melting vessel 214, for example between melting vessel 214 and fining vessel 234. In some embodiments, a conditioning vessel may be employed between the melting vessel and the fining vessel wherein molten glass from a primary melting vessel is further heated in a secondary vessel to continue the melting process, or cooled to a temperature lower than the temperature of the molten glass in the primary melting vessel before entering the fining vessel.
The downstream glass manufacturing apparatus 230 can further include another conditioning vessel, such as a mixing apparatus 236, for example a stirring vessel, for mixing the molten glass that flows downstream from fining vessel 234. Mixing apparatus 236 can be used to provide a homogenous glass melt composition, thereby reducing chemical or thermal inhomogeneities that may otherwise exist within the fined molten glass exiting the fining vessel. As shown, fining vessel 234 may be coupled to mixing apparatus 236 by way of a second connecting conduit 238. In some embodiments, molten glass 228 may be gravity fed from the fining vessel 234 to mixing apparatus 236 by way of second connecting conduit 238. For instance, gravity may drive molten glass 228 through an interior pathway of second connecting conduit 238 from fining vessel 234 to mixing apparatus 236. Typically, the molten glass within the mixing apparatus includes a free surface, with a free volume extending between the free surface and a top of the mixing apparatus. It should be noted that while mixing apparatus 236 is shown downstream of fining vessel 234 relative to a flow direction of the molten glass, mixing apparatus 236 may be positioned upstream from fining vessel 234 in other embodiments. In some embodiments, downstream glass manufacturing apparatus 230 may include multiple mixing apparatus, for example a mixing apparatus upstream from fining vessel 234 and a mixing apparatus downstream from fining vessel 234. These multiple mixing apparatus may be of the same design, or they may be of a different design from one another. In some embodiments, one or more of the vessels and/or conduits may include static mixing vanes positioned therein to promote mixing and subsequent homogenization of the molten material.
Downstream glass manufacturing apparatus 230 can further include another conditioning vessel such as delivery vessel 240 that may be located downstream from mixing apparatus 236. Delivery vessel 240 may condition molten glass 228 to be fed into a downstream forming device. For instance, delivery vessel 240 can act as an accumulator and/or flow controller to adjust and provide a consistent flow of molten glass 228 to forming body 242 by way of exit conduit 244. The molten glass within delivery vessel 240 can, in some embodiments, include a free surface, wherein a free volume extends upward from the free surface to a top of the delivery vessel. As shown, mixing apparatus 236 may be coupled to delivery vessel 240 by way of third connecting conduit 246. In some examples, molten glass 228 may be gravity fed from mixing apparatus 236 to delivery vessel 240 by way of third connecting conduit 246. For instance, gravity may drive molten glass 228 through an interior pathway of third connecting conduit 246 from mixing apparatus 236 to delivery vessel 240.
Downstream glass manufacturing apparatus 230 can further include forming apparatus 248 comprising the above-referenced forming body 242, including inlet conduit 250. Exit conduit 244 can be positioned to deliver molten glass 228 from delivery vessel 240 to inlet conduit 250 of forming apparatus 248. Forming body 242 in a fusion down draw glass making apparatus can comprise a trough 252 positioned in an upper surface of the forming body and converging forming surfaces 254 (only one surface shown) that converge in a draw direction along a bottom edge (root) 256 of the forming body. Molten glass delivered to the forming body trough via delivery vessel 240, exit conduit 244 and inlet conduit 250 overflows the walls of the trough and descends along the converging forming surfaces 254 as separate flows of molten glass. It should be noted that the molten glass within the forming body trough comprises a free surface, and a free volume extends from the free surface of the molten glass to the top of an enclosure within which the forming body is positioned. The flow of molten glass down at least a portion of the converging forming surfaces is intercepted and directed by a dam and edge directors. The separate flows of molten glass join below and along the root to produce a single ribbon of molten glass 258 that is drawn in a draw direction 260 from root 256 by applying a downward tension to the glass ribbon, such as by gravity and/or pulling roll pairs, to control the dimensions of the glass ribbon as the molten glass cools and a viscosity of the material increases. Therefore, draw path 260 extends transverse to a width of the glass ribbon 258. Glass ribbon 258 goes through a visco-elastic transition in a setting zone 268 and acquires mechanical properties that give glass ribbon 258 stable dimensional characteristics.
Forming apparatus 248 may further include two upper pulling roll pairs 270, two lower pulling roll pairs 274, and thermal control units 266. Each pulling roll pair 270 and 274 is controlled by a controller (
Thermal control units 266 may be controlled by controller 280 through a signal path 286. While thermal control units 266 are illustrated in
Within the setting zone indicated for example at 268, the temperature dependent coefficient of thermal expansion may be non-linear. Since the shape of glass ribbon 258 determines the out of plane deformation or warp of the glass substrates produced therefrom, the shape of glass ribbon 258 may be controlled by using a combination of pulling roll pairs 270 and 274 and controlled thermal gradients provided by thermal control units 266. Thermal control units 266 may add energy to (i.e., heat) and/or extract energy from (i.e., cool) glass ribbon 258 in a controlled manner. The specific method in which thermal control units 266 and pulling roll pairs 270 and 274 are used to influence the shape of glass ribbon 258 may be dependent upon the glass composition and other factors, such as, for example, the glass flow density, the methods of thermal control, and the size of glass ribbon 258.
Thermal control units 266 influence the temperature gradients and cooling rates both in the vertical direction (i.e., draw direction 216) and in the horizontal direction (i.e., transverse to the draw direction 216). These temperature gradients work in concert with pulling roll pairs 270 and 274. Pulling roll pairs 270 and 274 may include out of plane offsets to control the position of glass ribbon 258 as well as variable torque control, tilt position, and pinch (i.e., normal) force that control the amount of mechanical tension that is acted upon glass ribbon 258. The temperature gradients also control the tension acting upon glass ribbon 258 due to thermal impact, which is based on the glass material properties.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to embodiments of the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Thus it is intended that the present disclosure cover such modifications and variations provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/629338 filed on Feb. 12, 2018 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/463198 filed on Feb. 24, 2017, the contents of each of which are relied upon and incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/019411 | 2/23/2018 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62629338 | Feb 2018 | US | |
62463198 | Feb 2017 | US |