The present invention relates to door beam assemblies used in modern passenger vehicles to provide side impact resistance during a vehicle crash.
Many door beam assemblies exist for providing side impact strength in passenger vehicles. However, improvements are desired to reduce cost, reduce weight, increase impact strength, maintain consistency and repeatability of energy absorption during an impact (i.e. the beam's force-deflection curve), improve manufacturability including reducing secondary manufacturing operations, and improve assemble-ability. This is not easily accomplished given many conflicting requirements, including the need to stay within a desired package space and to provide mounting brackets on ends of the beam and along sides the beam for both right-side and left-side vehicle components.
In one aspect of the present invention, a door beam assembly for a passenger vehicle comprises a tubular beam having a constant cross section, the constant cross section having top, inside, outside, and bottom walls generally defining a non-circulate tubular shape, at least one of the inside and outside walls having an integral rib formed therein that adds stiffness to the one wall, and including mounting brackets on ends of the tubular beam for attaching the tubular beam to a door assembly.
In another aspect of the present invention, a door beam assembly for a passenger vehicle comprises a tubular beam having a constant cross section, the constant cross section having top, inside, outside, and bottom walls; and mounting brackets attached to ends of the tubular beam, the mounting brackets having opposing walls welded to the top and bottom walls and having a transverse wall connecting the opposing walls that is spaced from the inside wall.
In another aspect of the present invention, a door beam assembly for a passenger vehicle comprises a tubular beam having a constant cross section and longitudinal curve, the constant cross section having top, inside, outside, and bottom walls; and mounting brackets on ends of the tubular beam, the mounting brackets having opposing walls welded to and supporting the top and bottom walls.
In another aspect of the present invention, a set of door beam assemblies for a passenger vehicle comprises right and left door beam assemblies, each including a beam having a continuous cross section, front and rear mounting brackets attached to each end, and a center bracket; at least one of the beam, the front and rear mounting brackets and the center bracket being identical on each of the right and left door beam assemblies.
Methods related to the above also form a part of the present invention.
These and other aspects, objects, and features of the present invention will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art upon studying the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
A door beam assembly 20 (
The illustrated beam 21 is roll formed of a high strength steel material, such as a tensile strength of about 450-550 MPa (80-100 ksi) and a thickness of 1.6-3 mm thickness. However, it is contemplated that other materials of higher or lower strength and/or higher or lower thicknesses can be used, depending on functional requirements. For example, an ultra high strength steel material could be used having a tensile strength of 1500 MPa (270+ksi) and thickness of less than 1 mm (such as 0.8 mm) for an extra high strength and low weight. A rectangular cross sectional shape defined by the walls 22-25 of the beam 21 allows it to be roll formed using a process not unlike that shown in Sturrus U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,092,512 and 5,454,504, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein for their teachings. The longitudinal curvature (i.e. “sweep”) in the illustrated beam 21 is relatively small, but it is contemplated that beams can be made less curved or more curved, depending on a vehicle's design.
A shape of the beam 21 as used in a door beam is believed to be novel, unobvious, and patentable. Specifically, the rectangular cross sectional shape of the beam 21 is believed to be unusual for door beams, in that it is about 45 mm deep (in a cross car direction) and about 31 mm high (in a vertical direction), and it includes an inboard/inside wall 25-27 formed by three curves. The three curves include the channel rib 25 in a center location and two protruding radiused sections 26, 27 on each side of the channel rib 25. The illustrated protruding sections 26, 27 define a radius of about 5-7 mm, and the illustrated channel rib 25 has a radius of slightly less than 5 mm and slightly less than 180 degrees. However, it is contemplated that the protruding sections and channel rib may have alternative shapes and sizes, depending on functional requirements of a particular door beam assembly. Testing has shown that the channel rib 25 stiffens and stabilizes the inside wall 26, 27 and generally stabilizes the beam 21, resulting in improved impact strength and energy-absorbing characteristics, particularly with the ultra-high strength materials and thin materials used in the illustrated beam 21.
The illustrated beam assembly 20 is for a left driver-side vehicle door, but persons skilled in the art will recognize that a right passenger-side vehicle door can be constructed using parts to form a mirror image. Artisans will also recognize that the right vehicle door can use an identical beam 21 and an identical center bracket 24 if desired.
The brackets 22-24 are formed from a stampable steel material, such as a steel sheet having tensile strengths much lower than that used for beam 21. The illustrated brackets 22, 23 each have a U-shaped portion that engages the beam 21, and a Z-shaped attachment flange extending from the U-shaped portion with bolt-receiving apertures for attachment to a door frame on the vehicle door. The U-shaped portion includes opposing walls 28, 29 and transverse wall 30. The walls 28 and 29 lie adjacent the top and bottom walls 23, 24 of the beam 21 and are welded to them. The transverse wall 30 is spaced from the adjacent inside wall 22 of the beam 21, such as to define a gap of about 4 mm. This facilitates secondary assembly, and adds to the overall impact strength and consistency of impact strength and energy-absorbing capability of the present door beam assembly 20. The attachment flange is configured to matingly engage mating material on the door frame and can include weld pad areas or apertures for fastener attachment as required.
A modified door beam assembly 20A (
C-shaped mounting brackets 22A, 23A are attached to beam ends, with opposing walls 28A, 29A on bracket 22A being welded to and supporting top and bottom walls 31A, 31AA, 32A, 32AA of the beam 21A, and with a transverse wall 30A being spaced from the adjacent inside wall 33A of the beam 21A, and with opposing walls 35A, 36A on bracket 23A being welded to and supporting top and bottom walls 31A, 31AA, 32A, 32AA of the beam 21A, and with a transverse wall 37A being spaced from the adjacent inside wall 33A of the beam 21A. A center bracket(s) 24A is welded to one of the walls, such as the bottom wall 32A. In one aspect, right and left door beam assemblies (20A) include identical beams 21A and an identical center bracket 24A, and different front and rear mounting brackets 22A, 23A attached to beam ends.
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure without departing from the concepts of the present invention and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
This application claims benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of provisional application Ser. No. 61/529,391, filed Aug. 31, 2011, entitled DOOR BEAM ASSEMBLY WITH ROLL FORMED BEAM the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2827315 | Nock et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
4090734 | Inami et al. | May 1978 | A |
4599843 | Ingvarsson | Jul 1986 | A |
4708390 | Palentyn et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5080427 | Sturrus et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5092512 | Sturrus et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5123694 | DePierre et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5232261 | Kuroda et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5370437 | Alberda | Dec 1994 | A |
5404690 | Hanf | Apr 1995 | A |
5454504 | Sturrus | Oct 1995 | A |
5544930 | Stedman | Aug 1996 | A |
5573298 | Walker et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580120 | Nees et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5800007 | Cho | Sep 1998 | A |
5813719 | Kowalski | Sep 1998 | A |
5868456 | Kowalski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6020039 | Cline et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6050049 | Kowalski et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053565 | Cho | Apr 2000 | A |
6082811 | Yoshida | Jul 2000 | A |
6135541 | Geise et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6382707 | Dunneback | May 2002 | B1 |
6390534 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6454884 | McNulty et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6557318 | Graber | May 2003 | B2 |
6575525 | Traister et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591577 | Goto et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6622450 | Nees et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6817652 | Graber et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824198 | Sakuma et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846033 | Chu et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6908141 | Doi et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918224 | Tjoelker et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6957844 | Chu et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7014249 | Karuppaswamy et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7316446 | Wikstrom | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325862 | Rieder et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347486 | Uchida et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7401847 | Kidachi et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7497504 | Peters et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7631925 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637555 | Kameoka | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648191 | Sakamoto et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20090026795 | Tate | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100090495 | Suzuki | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100230997 | Buschsieweke et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242284 | Danaj et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100301630 | Ohta et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2692848 | Dec 1993 | FR |
06072152 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06106978 | Apr 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130049397 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61529391 | Aug 2011 | US |