The invention relates to a door beam for vehicles with attachment ends to the vehicle and a double hat profile between the attachment ends, comprising two outer side walls with lateral flanges, two inner side walls, two apexes defined between the outer and inner side walls and directed outwards from the vehicle, and an apex defined between the inner side walls and directed inwards towards the vehicle.
Door beams with a double hat profile are known, for example from U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,762 B2.
The object of the invention is to give the door beam a favourable deformation progression in the event of a lateral collision and thereby increase its energy take-up in relation to its weight and to the maximum profile height.
The object of the invention is achieved when the height of the outer side walls decreases from a central part of the beam towards the attachment ends, so that the ratio in height between the outer and the inner side walls decreases towards the attachment ends. The invention is defined by the claims.
The door beam shown in the figures consists of thin, high-strength steel plate. It can be formed and hardened using press hardening technology, i.e. thermoformed and hardened in the same operation in cooled forming dies. It has two attachment ends 12, 13 and between the attachment ends it has the double hat profile with two outer side walls 14, 15 with lateral flanges 16, 17 and two inner side walls 18, 19. Between the outer and inner side walls two apexes 20, 21 are formed, directed outwards from the vehicle. Between the inner side walls an apex 22 is formed that is directed inwards towards the vehicle.
On a central part 25 of the beam, the profile is constant, and from this central part the height of the outer side walls 14, 15 decreases at least in one direction over a length of at least ¼ of the length of the beam, or as shown in both directions. In the example it is shown that the height of the side walls decreases symmetrically in both directions in continuous curves, but symmetry is not necessary. The height of the outer side walls 14, 15 decreases towards the attachment ends 12, 13 so that the ratio in height between the outer and inner side walls diminishes towards each attachment end over a length of at least ¼ of the length of the beam. The height of the inner side walls 18, 19 can remain constant as shown. A central part with a constant profile is not necessary.
The attachment ends 12, 13 can have a different appearance. In the example, the attachment end 12 is shown completely flat, while the attachment end 13 has a profile. It can have a low single hat profile or a low double hat profile, for example.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1200732 | Nov 2012 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2013/000172 | 11/15/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/084768 | 6/5/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4090734 | Inami | May 1978 | A |
4948196 | Baba | Aug 1990 | A |
5600931 | Jonsson | Feb 1997 | A |
5743588 | Ufrecht | Apr 1998 | A |
5877938 | Hobbs | Mar 1999 | A |
5922922 | Harris | Jul 1999 | A |
6416114 | Topker | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6641207 | Passone | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6679540 | Graber | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7086686 | Bullmann | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7819462 | Owens | Oct 2010 | B1 |
20020195836 | Gehringhoff | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040036316 | Bodin | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040150249 | Gehringhoff | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20070145770 | Katou | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090322117 | Arvidsson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120285098 | Rakei | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140246879 | Ishigame | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140319869 | Baskar | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011 225190 | Nov 2011 | JP |
WO02060712 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO2008033066 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO2011063950 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150291011 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |