The invention pertains to a door with a leaf, which can be moved between an open position and a closed position; with a guide element, which is fastened to the leaf and which cooperates with a guide rail to guide the movement of the leaf; and with a locking device, which can be shifted between a release position, in which it allows the movement of the leaf, and a blocking position, in which it opposes the movement of the leaf, the locking device being equipped with a locking element, which, when the device is moved into the locking position, comes to rest against a contact surface of the guide rail, and to a locking device for these types of doors.
Doors of the type just described are realized in the form of, for example, so-called sectional doors, in which the door leaf consists of a plurality of panels, which are arranged next to each other in the direction in which the leaf travels, and which are hinged to each other so that they can pivot around axes which are perpendicular to the direction in which the leaf travels. In these sectional doors, the leaf of the door is usually in a vertical plane when the door is closed and in an overhead horizontal plane when the door is open. Guide rails are usually provided at each edge of the leaf to guide the movement of the leaf; these rails have a first, more-or-less vertical section, which is parallel to the lateral edge of the leaf when the door is closed; a second section, which extends in the horizontal direction and which is more-or-less parallel to the lateral edge of the leaf when the door is open; and an arc-shaped connecting section. Guide elements, especially guide rollers, are mounted on the leaf to cooperate with these guide rails; the guide rollers engage in the guide rails to enable the leaf to move smoothly.
To make it easier to open the door, i.e., to move the leaf from the closed position to the open position, counterbalancing systems are usually provided, which can be realized in the form of sets of tension springs or torsion springs. These springs are connected at the other end to the leaf by way of tensioning means attached to the lower edge of the door leaf. The springs are tensioned when the door is closed, i.e., moved from the open position to the closed position, and the energy stored in the springs is thus available to support the next opening movement. At the same time, these counterbalancing devices also prevent the door leaf from dropping down abruptly during the course of the closing movement.
To prevent damage to the door leaf and especially to prevent injury to the person using the door, it is also necessary to prevent the door from dropping uncontrollably even after the tensioning means and/or the springs used as the counterbalancing device have broken. For this reason, conventional doors of the type described above are usually equipped with locking devices, which prevent the door leaf from moving after the tensioning means and/or the springs forming the counterbalancing device have broken.
A door with this type of locking device is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 1,936,269. The door described in this document has a locking device with a locking element realized in the form of a catch, which, after the tensioning means have broken, engages in an opening provided in the guide rail and thus prevents the door leaf from dropping down in an uncontrolled manner. Nevertheless, the presence of openings in the guide rail has the effect of weakening the rail. For this reason, the guide rail of the door described in this document is provided with an especially sturdy design, which includes a support plate and a total of four angle sections welded to this support plate.
In a door described in DE 37 30 363 C1, the locking device has a catch slide attached to the door leaf. A clamping jaw which surrounds a rod separate from the guide rail is held movably in this slide. The design of this locking device is especially complicated, because it requires not only the catch slide and the clamping jaw held inside it but also a separate rod to serve as a guide for the catch slide. During the use of doors equipped with safety devices of this type, furthermore, it has been discovered that it cannot be ensured that the descent of the door leaf will be braked reliably after the tensioning means or the counterbalancing device has broken.
The same problems with respect to operating reliability also occur in the case of the door described in DE 38 14 275 C2, the locking device of which has a brake shoe 6, which can be pressed by a spring against the outside surface of the guide rail. A significant improvement in operating reliability is not achieved with the locking devices described in DE 38 00 404 A1 either, in which a locking element 7 is held in the guide rail. After the tensioning means have broken and/or the counterbalancing device has been damaged, this locking element is pushed by a tension spring against an internal boundary surface of the guide rail, so that the locking teeth 9 of the locking element 7 can come into contact with this boundary surface.
In view of the problems of the state of the art explained above, the invention is based on the task of providing a door of the type described above, the leaf of which is reliably prevented from dropping uncontrollably and which nevertheless has a simple mechanical design with only a few individual parts.
This task is accomplished by an elaboration of the known doors, which is characterized essentially in that, when the locking element is in the locking position, it is pushed toward the contact surface of the guide rail by a thrust element, especially by the guide element, which is attached to the leaf.
This solution is based on the realization that the force of the spring acting on the locking element of the . . . in DE 38 00 404 A1 in the direction toward the locking position is not enough to produce a sufficient braking action, and that the weight of the door leaf, which acts only indirectly on this locking element, is not sufficient either to ensure the desired braking action even when locking teeth are provided on the locking element. The reason for this is that, when the locking device is in the release position, the locking element, like the roller for ensuring the smooth movement of the door leaf, has a certain amount of play in the guide rail, which means that it can escape inside the guide rail in a direction perpendicular to the contact surface.
In the door according to the invention, this escape movement is prevented in that the thrust element, which can be, for example, the guide element, presses the locking element toward the contact surface, thus reliably allowing the locking element to exert the desired blocking effect. This high degree of operating reliability can be achieved without any additional components, because, in comparison to the known locking devices, the locking element must be shifted only to a point at which it can be pressed by the guide element against the contact surface. In addition, the inventive locking device can be used even when the guide rails are not extra sturdy, because the danger of damage to the rails is reduced simply by the fact that the guide element makes two-dimensional contact with the guide rail instead of the more concentrated contact by the outward-projecting locking teeth of DE 38 00 404 A1, for example. For this reason, there is hardly any danger that the locking element could damage the guide rail. Obtaining a reliable locking effect by means of two-dimensional contact is made possible, furthermore, by the inventive positioning of the locking element at a point at which it can be pressed by the guide element against the contact surface. The contact surface of the guide element coming to rest against the contact surface of the guide rail can be in the form of a hard, roughened wedge-shaped surface.
Within the scope of the invention, the intention is also to design a locking device in which the locking element is pressed only indirectly, i.e., by the intermediate action of one or more force-transmitting elements, against the contact surface. For the sake of an especially simple design, however, it has been found to be especially favorable for it to be possible for the locking element to make direct contact with the guide element when the locking device is shifted into the locking position. In this case, the desired blocking of the movement of the door leaf can be achieved in an especially reliable fashion by providing the locking element with a first, preferably essentially flat contact surface, which comes to rest, when the device is in the locking position, against the guide rail, and with a second contact surface, which, when the device is in the locking position, comes to rest against the guide element, where the first contact surface and the second contact surface are at an acute angle to each other of preferably less than 30°, especially of about 20°.
When the tensioning means breaks, the locking element can be shifted into the locking position in an especially reliable manner by a pretensioning device, which pushes the locking element into the locking position. In this case, the locking device can be connected to a drive device and/or to a counterbalancing device realized in the form of, for example, a tension or torsion spring arrangement via a tensioning means in such a way that the drive device and/or the counterbalancing device can exert a force on it which opposes the pretensioning force of the pretensioning device and thus acts to push the locking device into the release position. When the tensioning means and counterbalancing devices or drive devices are operating properly, therefore, it is possible to ensure the trouble-free operation of the door. The locking device can be connected to the tensioning means and/or to the counterbalancing device very easily by providing the locking device with a lever, which is mounted so that it can pivot around a pivot axis extending transversely, especially more-or-less perpendicularly, to the longitudinal direction of the guide rail. The lever itself can be connected on one side of the pivot axis to the tensioning means and on the other side of the pivot axis to the locking element. In this case, the pivoting of the lever has the effect of pushing the locking element against the contact surface of the guide rail. An especially reliable way of ensuring that, in the course of this movement, the first contact surface of the locking element will arrive in two-dimensional contact with the contact surface of the guide rail is to mount the locking element on the lever in such a way that it can tilt around a tilt axis which is more-or-less perpendicular to the pivot axis. In the design of the locking device just mentioned, the pretensioning device can be realized very easily in the form of a torsion spring, which acts at one end on the lever and is supported at the other end at least indirectly on the door leaf.
As explained above, the danger of damage to the guide rail by the action of the locking element is reduced simply by the fact that the locking element makes two-dimensional contact with the contact surface of the guide rail. A further reduction in the risk of damage can be achieved without any significant extra effort by providing the locking device with a support element, which is located on the side of the guide rail opposite the contact surface of the guide rail. A support element of this type prevents the guide rail from bulging outward under the force of the locking element acting on the contact surface, because the corresponding part of the guide rail will come to rest against the support element, which prevents the outward bulging.
The locking element, like the support element, is advisably attached to the door leaf, so that it will move together with the leaf along the guide rail. Because the guide rail usually also has a curved guide rail section, it is preferable, as a way of ensuring the trouble-free movement of the door leaf, for the support element to be supported so that it, too, can pivot around the pivot axis. As a result, the support element can change position to conform to the shape of the arc-shaped guide rail section.
The guide element attached to the door leaf of an inventive door advisably has a support shaft, which is more-or-less perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the guide rail and parallel to the plane of the door leaf; this shaft holds the guide element on the door leaf. In this case, a very simple design for mounting the lever carrying the locking element and/or the support element so that they are free to pivot is to allow the support shaft to pass through the lever and/or the support element. In this design, an especially compact assembly can be realized by also allowing the guide rail to pass through the torsion spring which pushes the locking device toward the locking position. As already discussed above, the locking device of the inventive door is advisably fastened to the door leaf. A very simple but also very strong method of realizing this attachment is to use a bracket element with a U-shaped profile. The bracket element has a connecting sidepiece, which is attached to a boundary surface of the door leaf, and two outer sidepieces, which are preferably more-or-less parallel to each other and through which the support shaft passes.
So that the door leaf can move with very little friction, it has been found advisable for the guide element to have a guide roller, which is supported so that it can rotate around the longitudinal axis of the support shaft, even though, within the scope of the invention, it is also possible to use simple guide elements in the form of guide pins, which move along the guide rail. If a guide element with a guide roller is used, the profile of the guide rail will advisably have the form of “C” or a “J” in the cross-sectional plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and thus be suitable for accepting the guide roller. A profile of this type has one sidepiece which is more-or-less perpendicular to the pivot axis of the lever and to the plane of the door leaf, at least one sidepiece which is more-or-less parallel to the plane of the door leaf, and a rounded sidepiece, which serves as a contact surface for the guide roller. So that defined contact can be established between the locking element and the guide rail, the contact surface is advisably formed by the sidepiece which is more-or-less parallel to the plane of the door leaf. AS already explained above, the invention is used to particular advantage in sectional doors, in which the door leaf is made up of a plurality of panels, which are arranged next to each other in the direction in which the door leaf travels and which are hinged to each other around pivot axes which are perpendicular to the direction in which the door leaf travels.
Within the scope of the invention, it is the intention not only to produce complete doors including the safety device but also to retrofit already existing doors with the device. An inventive safety device suitable for this purpose comprises a locking element, which, when moving into the locking position, arrives between the guide element and the guide rail. This locking element can be mounted on a pivotably supported lever, which for its own part has an opening, through which the support shaft of the guide element passes. The locking element can in this case be mounted on the lever so that it can tilt around a tilt axis which is parallel to the pivot axis. In addition, the locking element can be provided with a support element, which can also have an opening, through which the support shaft of the guide element can pass, where this support element can include a sidepiece which grips the guide rail from behind, this sidepiece being located on the side of the guide rail opposite the contact surface.
The invention is explained in greater detail below on the basis of the drawing, to which reference is explicitly made for all of the details which are essential to the invention but which are not mentioned specifically in the description:
The sectional door shown in the drawing comprises:
The bracket element 30 has the form of a U-shaped profile in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the guide rail 20, this profile consisting of a connecting sidepiece 32, which rests against the interior surface 12 of the panel 10, and two outer sidepieces 34 and 36, which are more-or-less perpendicular to the connecting sidepiece.
So that the bracket element 30 can be fixed in place, the connecting sidepiece 32 has a total of four holes, through which fastening screws 38 are passed and introduced into the panel 10. The outer sidepieces 34 and 36 of the bracket element 30 have holes 35 and 37, respectively, which are designed to accept the support shaft 42 of the guide element 40. The holes 35 and 37 are arranged so that the guide element 40 can rotate around an axis of rotation 43, which is perpendicular to the guide rail 20 and parallel to the interior surface 12 of the panel 10. At the end facing the guide rail 20, the support shaft 42 is equipped with a guide roller 44, which, in the assembled state, is held inside the guide rail 20. In the cross-sectional plane perpendicular to its longitudinal direction, the guide rail 20 has a profile in the shape of a “J” with a sidepiece 22 more-or-less perpendicular to the axis of rotation 43 of the guide element 40, a sidepiece 24 forming a clean right angle, and a rounded sidepiece 26, where the rounded sidepiece 26 forms a contact surface for the guide roller 44 and simultaneously prevents the roller 44 from being removed from the guide rail 20 in a direction parallel to the axis of rotation 43.
The locking device, designated overall by the reference number 50, comprises a lever 60; a wedge-shaped locking element 70, which can be mounted on the lever in such a way that that it can tilt; a support element 80; and a pretensioning device, designed as a torsion spring 90. The lever 60 and the support element 80 have through-holes 62, 84, respectively, which are designed to accept the support shaft 42 of the guide element 40. In this way, the lever 60 and the support element 80 can be held on the support shaft 42 and thus also on the panel 10 in such a way that they can pivot around the axis of rotation 43 of the guide element 40. On one side of the through-hole 62, the lever 60 has a projection 64 at its lower edge, through which a hole 65 passes; this projection can be introduced into a slot 72 in the wedge-shaped locking element 70. A hole 74 also passes through a lateral boundary surface of the locking element 70; when the projection 64 is introduced into the slot 72, this through-hole can be brought into alignment with the hole 65, so that the locking element 70 can be attached to the lower edge of the lever 60 so that it can tilt around a tilt axis which is parallel to the axis of rotation 43 of the guide element 40, the attachment being accomplished by inserting a fastening pin (not shown) through the holes 74 and 65. A bolt 66 with a radially expanded head is attached to the lever 60 near the upper edge. In the assembled state, a loop 102 of a tensioning means passes around this bolt. The other end of the tensioning means is attached to a counterbalancing device (not shown) and/or to a drive device (not shown). In the assembled state, the bolt 66 is located in the line of action of force leading to the axis of rotation 43.
The support element 80 comprises a sidepiece 86, which is perpendicular to the support shaft 42 and through which the shaft passes, and a sidepiece 82, which, in the exemplary embodiment shown here, proceeds at a clean right angle from this sidepiece 86. In the assembled state, this sidepiece 82 grips the sidepiece 24 of the guide rail 20 from behind.
One end 94 of the torsion spring 90 grips an abutment 68 of the lever 60, which is bent out at a right angle, while the other end 92 is supported by way of the bracket element 30 against the panel 10. In the assembled state, the lever 60 and the support element 70 are located between the sidepiece 36 of the bracket element 30 and the guide roller 44 of the guide element 40. The lever 66 is pushed by the torsion spring 90 in the direction indicated by the arrow P in
If the tensioning means 100 becomes broken and/or the counterbalancing device or the drive device is damaged, the force exerted on the lever 60 via the tensioning means 100 disappears. As a result, the lever 60 will be pushed by the torsion spring 90 in the direction indicated by the arrow P in
In the embodiment of the invention shown in the drawing, this blocking effect of the locking element is enhanced by designing the contact surfaces 76 and 78 so that they form an acute angle of approximately 20° with each other. To support the blocking action of the locking element 70, the contact surface 76 acting on the contact surface 25 is made of a hard, roughened material. In the locking device according to the invention, the fact that the locking element 70 arrives in a state of two-dimensional contact with the contact surface 25 eliminates most of the danger that the sidepiece 24 of the guide rail 20 forming the contact surface 25 could, after the locking element 70 has arrived in the blocking position shown in
Because, in the embodiment of the invention shown in the drawing, the locking element acts on the cleanly bent sidepiece 24 of the guide rail 20 and not on the rounded sidepiece 26, which forms the contact surface for the guide roller during normal operation, the functionality of the door is not impaired after the locking element has returned from the blocking position to the release position.
The invention is not limited to the exemplary embodiment explained on the basis of the drawing. On the contrary, it is also intended that the inventive locking devices can be used in conjunction with conventional tilting doors. The guide element can also be designed in the form of a simple guide pin instead of a guide roller. The locking element, furthermore, can also act on a different part of the guide rail.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP02/04160 | 4/15/2002 | WO | 00 | 8/1/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/087506 | 10/23/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2274552 | Kingsland | Feb 1942 | A |
3188698 | Zoll et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3579910 | Wetter | May 1971 | A |
4385471 | Gabry et al. | May 1983 | A |
4520591 | Calvagno | Jun 1985 | A |
4604828 | Baarse | Aug 1986 | A |
5291686 | Sears et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5337520 | Uribe | Aug 1994 | A |
6189266 | Mihalcheon | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6279268 | Beaudoin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6401793 | Martin | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6553716 | Bruns | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6640496 | Mullet | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6715236 | Mullet | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6834464 | Shoemaker | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7000354 | Beaudoin et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7089990 | Hormann et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097003 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20020069585 | Schiks | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030041520 | Mullet | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051408 | Mullet | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051409 | Bruns | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050098275 | Hormann et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050133170 | Hormann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050224194 | Hormann et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3730363 | Dec 1988 | DE |
3800404 | Jul 1989 | DE |
3814275 | Feb 1993 | DE |
2394660 | Jan 1979 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060053694 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |