The entire disclosure of the inventor's corresponding Japanese patent application, Serial No. JP PA 2013-183469, filed Sep. 4, 2013, is hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a door control device in which a door drive portion is constituted by an electric motor and a door is controlled to be opened and closed by driving force of the door drive portion.
2. Description of the Background Art
As shown in
The train door driven by the door drive portion built in the door control device 2 is characterized by the existence of a lock mechanism 5 shown in
As shown in
Event (E5a) “Obstruction Detected” shown in a center lower portion of
JP-A-2003-020858 discloses a method for opening/closing a motor-operated switch. That is, JP-A-2003-020858 describes the method which includes: a first step of setting a timer in accordance with a movement distance toward a close direction or an open direction and starting an electric motor in the close direction or the open direction when a close switch or an open switch is turned ON in open/close control in a power window in a car etc.; and a second step of stopping the electric motor when pulses from a pulse generation unit are counted and reach a predetermined count value after the first step or when the time counted by the timer is up before the pulses reach the predetermined count value. Thus, abnormality of the motor-operated switch can be detected in an early stage and the overload state of the electric motor can be avoided. In addition, in the above description, the electric motor is rotated reversely when the time counted by the timer is up during operation of the electric motor.
It is believed that even the background-art door open/close sequence shown in
In addition, in the aforementioned method for the open/close control of the power window in JP-A-2003-020858, the motor-operated switch is suspended based on the time limit set by the timer as a safety measure during trouble of the sensor. Therefore, when this method is applied to a train door, the train may run with the door open. Accordingly, there is a problem that the method cannot be used for taking a sufficient safety measure.
Therefore, an object of the invention is to provide a door control device which can perform a safe operation even when obstruction or abnormality occurs in a door close detection switch, a lock mechanism, etc.
In order to achieve the object, according to a first configuration of the invention, there is provided a door control device for making control to open/close a door through a door drive portion, wherein: the door control device at least includes:
a door open/close control portion which has an open command portion giving an open command to the door drive portion, a close command portion giving a close command to the door drive portion, a reclose command portion giving a reclose command to the door drive portion, and a recycle open and close command portion giving a recycle open and close command to the door drive portion;
a door close control portion which drives the door drive portion in response to the close command or the reclose command;
an open and close operation recycle control portion which drives the door drive portion recyclically in response to the recycle open and close command;
a door open control portion which drives the door drive portion in response to the open command;
a door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion which detects a full close state of the door based on ON/OFF of a switch; and
a lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion which detects operation/non-operation of a lock mechanism locking the door in a close position; and
in response to OFF of the switch detected by the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion and/or non-operation of the lock mechanism detected by the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion after full close of the door has been detected based on ON of the switch detected by the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion, a close operation of the door is continuously performed by the door close control portion until ON of the switch is detected by the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion.
In addition, according to a second configuration of the invention, there is provided a door control device according to the first configuration, wherein:
when the fact that the close operation of the door has been performed by the door close control portion a plurality of times recyclically within a predetermined time is detected, an obstruction signal of the lock mechanism is outputted.
In addition, according to a third configuration of the invention, there is provided a door control device according to the first configuration, wherein:
when ON of the switch is not detected by the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion in spite of the close operation of the door performed continuously for a predetermined time by the door close control portion, an obstruction signal of the door close detection switch is outputted.
In addition, according to a fourth configuration of the invention, there is provided a door control device according to any one of the first through third configurations, wherein:
an open command operation is made valid when the close operation of the door is continuously performed by the door close control portion due to OFF of the switch detected by the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion and/or non-operation of the lock mechanism detected by the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion after full close of the door has been detected based on ON of the switch detected by the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion.
According to the invention, it is possible to achieve a safe train door apparatus which does not affect a door open/close operation at normal time but can prevent an unsafe door open operation at obstruction time of the lock mechanism, the door close detection switch etc.
In addition, the invention can be achieved only by improvement of software in the door control device. Accordingly, function improvement can be attained without causing any increase of the cost spent for members, assembling, etc., in comparison with the case where the door control device is constituted by hardware.
Embodiments of the invention will be described below in detail.
In
The door open/close control portion 12 imports, as inputs to itself, signals from the aforementioned door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18, the aforementioned lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion 19 and the aforementioned door close obstacle detection/non-detection portion 20, an open request command/close request command from a not-shown operating system and signals from the aforementioned open operation monitoring portion 14 and the aforementioned close operation monitoring portion 16. At the same time, the door open/close control portion 12 outputs, from itself, an open command to the door open control portion 13 through an open command portion 121, a close command and a reclose command to the door close control portion 15 through a close command portion 122 and a reclose command portion 123, and a recycle open and close command to the open and close operation recycle control portion 17 through a recycle open and close command portion 124, respectively.
Here, when, for example, a foreign substance is caught in a door, Event (E5a) “Obstruction Detected” detects a state in which the door cannot be closed. In this case, the open and close operation recycle control portion 17 performs operation of “Recycle Open & Close” in Status (S5) to open the door once up to a full open state and then resume a close operation after a lapse of a predetermined time in order to remove the caught substance.
Incidentally, a control process performed by the door open/close control portion 12 in the door control device 11 can be implemented by a computer executing a program which is described with commands for executing the control process.
In the door open/close sequence shown in
Incidentally, in the operation of “Full Close” in Status (S1), it is determined that the door has been operated up to a full close position, based on operation signals (Dcsm=ON) of the door close detection switches 4 in Event (E4a). That is, after a close command is given to the door close control portion 15 from the close command portion 122 of the door open/close control portion 12 shown in
In the case where the door cannot be kept at the full close position due to obstruction of the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18 (also including obstruction of the door close detection switches 4 per se) or obstruction of the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion 19 (also including obstruction of the lock mechanism per se), the operation of “ReClose” in Status (S6) continuously gives a close command to the door close control portion 15 to shift the door to the “Full Close” state. Thus, safety can be secured even when unexpected obstruction occurs.
Even in the case where the operation of “ReClose” in Status (S6) is continued due to the obstruction of the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18 or the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion 19, the operation of Event (E1) “Open Request Command” is made valid in the same manner as in the background-art door open/close sequence shown in
Thus, according to the door open/close sequence according to the embodiment, it is possible to improve the situation of occurrence of such an extremely unexpected operation that Event (E4b) “Dcsm=OFF” falls into Event (E5a) “Obstruction Detected” in the background-art door open/close sequence shown in
Accordingly, due to the improvement in the door open/close sequence shown in
According to the aforementioned Embodiment 1, it is possible to improve the situation of occurrence of such an extremely unexpected operation that Event (E4b) “Dcsm=OFF” falls into Event (E5a) “Obstruction Detected” in the background-art door open/close sequence shown in
Even in the case where the quick door open and close recycle phenomenon occurs in this manner, the door is kept in a state close to “Full Close” in Status (S1). Accordingly, there is no special obstacle on the safety. Under normal circumstances, however, in view of the safety of the entire train operating system, whether to permit running or not, including whether to depart or whether to stop urgently, is determined after Event (E6b) “Dcsm=ON” in all doors has been confirmed.
Incidentally, as to the Dcsm signal, that is, the ON/OFF of the door close detection switch during the quick door open and close recycle operation, ON/OFF is recycled quickly in the same manner as the door open/close operation under normal circumstances. The determination time of “Dcsm=OFF” for determining whether the door is open or not during running depends on the entire train operating system, but is often set to be as long as about two seconds in consideration of false detection. Also taking into consideration the fact that the Dcsm signal is made OFF only for a short time (not longer than one second) during the aforementioned recycle operation, opening of the door cannot be detected during running under the setting. When the obstruction of the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection 19 cannot be detected, there is a risk that the train may keep on running as it is in spite of the obstruction.
Accordingly, a door control device according to Embodiment 2 of the invention is designed to further enhance the safety in order to prevent such a quick door open and close recycle operation from occurring.
In
The door open/close control portion 12 imports, as inputs to itself, signals from the aforementioned door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18, the aforementioned lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion 19 and the aforementioned door close obstacle detection/non-detection portion 20, an open request command/close request command from a not-shown operating system and signals from the aforementioned open operation monitoring portion 14 and the aforementioned close operation monitoring portion 16. At the same time, the door open/close control portion 12 outputs, from itself, an open command to the door open control portion 13 through an open command portion 121, a close command and a reclose command to the door close control portion 15 through a close command portion 122 and a reclose command portion 123, a recycle open and close command to the open and close operation recycle control portion 17 through a recycle open and close command portion 124, and further an obstruction close position maintenance command to the obstruction close position maintenance control portion 21 through an obstruction close position maintenance command portion 125, respectively.
In
Incidentally, in the obstruction detection event expressed as Event (E7) “Error Detected”, two kinds of obstruction detection methods which will be described later are effective. That is:
(Detection Method 1)
The fact that the quick door open and close recycle operation has been performed a plurality of times within a predetermined time is detected. Thus, the fact that the state of the operation of “Full Close” in Status (S1) cannot be kept due to the non-operation of the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion 19 or the obstruction of the lock mechanism per se is detected. Determination is made as obstruction of the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion 19 (also including obstruction of the lock mechanism 5 per se). An obstruction signal is outputted.
Specifically, the fact that the close operation of the door has been performed by the door close control portion 13 recyclically a plurality of times within a predetermined time is detected due to the recycle of ON/OFF of the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18. Thus, determination is made that the aforementioned quick door open and close recycle phenomenon has occurred. An obstruction signal of the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion 19 is outputted. The door is maintained in the close position, which is the position where the obstruction was detected, by the obstruction close position maintenance control portion 21.
(Detection Method 2)
The fact that the operation of “Full Close” in Status (S1) cannot be restored even if the operation of “ReClose” in Status (S6) is continued for a predetermined time is detected. Thus, determination is made as OFF obstruction of the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18 (also including obstruction of the door close detection switches 4 per se). An obstruction signal is outputted.
Specifically, in the case where ON cannot be detected by the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18 even when the close operation of the door performed by the door close control portion 13 is continued for a predetermined time, determination is made as obstruction of the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18. An obstruction signal of the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18 is outputted. The door is maintained at the close position, which is the position where the obstruction was detected, by the obstruction close position maintenance control portion 21.
Incidentally, predetermined values may be set in advance for the predetermined time for determination and the number of recycle times within the predetermined time in the aforementioned detection method 1 or 2.
When obstruction occurs in the door close detection switch ON/OFF detection portion 18 and/or obstruction occurs in the lock mechanism operation/non-operation detection portion 19, a recycle of operations in Statuses (S1)→(S6)→(S1)→(S6) . . . is performed in the aforementioned door apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of the invention. According to the door control device according to Embodiment 2 of the invention, however, such a recycle of operations can be prevented from occurring.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the disclosed method and apparatus. Other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosed method and apparatus. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2013-183469 | Sep 2013 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3745705 | Reddy | Jul 1973 | A |
3916567 | Daugirdas | Nov 1975 | A |
4035956 | Newson | Jul 1977 | A |
4051336 | Miller | Sep 1977 | A |
4133365 | Schleicher | Jan 1979 | A |
4142326 | Schmitz | Mar 1979 | A |
4413568 | Huon de Kermadec | Nov 1983 | A |
4476678 | Hall | Oct 1984 | A |
4490941 | Mamach | Jan 1985 | A |
4491917 | Higgins et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4621452 | Deeg | Nov 1986 | A |
4750591 | Coste et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4831509 | Jones et al. | May 1989 | A |
4882876 | Daugirdas | Nov 1989 | A |
4901474 | Bayard et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4981084 | Templeton et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5119739 | Templeton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5280754 | Flanagan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5341598 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5838126 | Llerena | Nov 1998 | A |
5841083 | Schonauer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5996281 | Takano et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6134838 | Reddy | Oct 2000 | A |
6525659 | Jaffe et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6626268 | Masuda et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631788 | Shikai et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6962239 | Shikai et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7603813 | Hackl | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8205387 | Ranaudo et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020144467 | Teich | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20100050526 | Ozaki | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20130125468 | El Fassi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130340346 | Ueda et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003-020858 | Jan 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150059247 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |