Various types of frames for doors, windows, and the like for houses and other buildings have been developed. A known type of door and window frame construction utilizes conventional species of wood such as pine or poplar. The wood may be made up of smaller pieces of wood that have been finger jointed together. In general, frame members that are made from finger jointed wood are lower cost than if a one-piece member were utilized to make the individual frame members. Such frames are generally primed and painted, and the finger joints are therefore not visible, and do not detract from the appearance of the finished product.
Window and door frames are normally exposed to moisture and other environmental factors, and the resulting decay, rotting, insect damage, and other deterioration of the wood has been a problem. Various frame constructions have been developed in an attempt to solve the problems associated with decay and deterioration of window and door frames. In general, known pressure-treated wood is not suitable for window and door frames because the compounds utilized to treat the wood interfere with paint that is applied to the treated wood, thereby making it difficult or impossible to provide a painted surface having the desired appearance.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,873,209; 5,661,943; 6,122,882; and 6,446,410 disclose door frames and other products having upper wood portions and lower portions made of an extruded wood-based product such as Strandex®, ERT®, Trex® or the like that are finger jointed to the wood upper portions. Although this arrangement does provide a degree of environmental resistance, the dissimilarity of the materials used in the upper and lower portions of the frames may cause difficulty in terms of applying coatings such as primer and/or paint.
Hence, a frame for doors, windows, and the like alleviating the disadvantages of known frames would be advantageous.
One aspect of the present invention is a construction component such as a frame for doors, windows, and the like having a plurality of frame members that are joined together to form a door or window frame. The frame includes an upper portion made of a conventional wood species such as red pine or the like. Lower portions of the frame are made from a highly weather, decay and rot resistant wood such as Alaskan yellow cypress, or other wood from the cypress family having the desired degree of decay resistance. Because the upper and lower portions of the frame are both made of wood, primers, paints, and other coatings adhere to both portions of the frame, and provide a finished product that is durable with respect to both the wood frame itself, and the coatings on the frame. The red pine or other conventional wood utilized in the upper portions of the frame is relatively inexpensive, thereby reducing the overall cost of the frame. The Alaskan yellow cypress or other such weather-resistant wood is preferably only used in the lower portions of the frame which are more heavily exposed to moisture and the like that would otherwise lead to decay of the wood frame. In addition to door and window frames, other components such as doors, siding, exterior trim, and the like may also be constructed using a combination of conventional wood and weather-resistant wood.
These and other features, advantages, and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and appended drawings.
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in
A door frame 1 (
In addition to the upper pieces of wood 5, the upright side frames 2 and 3 also include a decay-resistant lower piece of wood 10 that is connected to an adjacent upper piece of wood 5 by a finger joint 9. The decay-resistant lower pieces of wood 10 are preferably made of an Alaskan yellow cypress wood (chamaecyparis nootkatensis) that is highly resistant to decay, rot, insect damage and other degradation due to moisture and/or other weather or environmental conditions. As discussed in more detail below, molding or trim pieces 20, 21, and 22 made of two dissimilar species of wood may be secured to the door frame 1 when installed to a building structure.
The finger joint 9 interconnecting the upper wood pieces 5 with the decay-resistant lower wood pieces 10 may be a conventional finger joint that utilizes known waterproof or weather/moisture-resistant glue of a type previously used for finger joints. A conventional finger joint 9 is preferred because the tooling and techniques for forming such a joint are known, and such joints have proven to be suitable for many applications. Nevertheless, virtually any suitable joint configuration could be utilized to interconnect the upper pieces of wood 5 to the decay-resistant lower pieces of wood 10. For example, dovetails, dowels, mechanical connectors, or virtually any other connection arrangement may also be utilized.
A preferred wood for the decay-resistant lower wood pieces 10 is an Alaskan yellow cypress. This wood is extremely resistant to decay due to the naturally-occurring compounds in the wood. The Alaskan yellow cypress wood utilized to make the decay-resistant lower pieces of wood 10 is grown under conditions causing the tree to have a very slow growth rate, leading to relatively small growth rings and a high concentration of the naturally-occurring compounds that provide the weather and decay resistance of the wood. Although Alaskan yellow cypress is the preferred wood, other decay-resistant woods are also suitable for the decay-resistant lower pieces of wood 10. For example, the Wood Handbook-Wood as an Engineering Material, Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory lists various species as “resistant or very resistant” in Table 3 (page 3-18). In general, any wood having the required degree of decay resistance may be used for the decay-resistant lower pieces of wood 10. In general, the decay resistance of a particular piece of wood depends not only upon the species of wood, but the conditions under which the tree was grown. Accordingly, the species of wood and growth conditions are factors affecting the decay resistance of the wood.
As discussed above, the upper pieces of wood 5 may be made of a wood that has lower weather and decay resistance. Although red pine is presently a preferred wood, other woods such as radiator pine, eastern white pine, ponderosa pine, elliotis pine, or other pines, poplars, or other species are also suitable. It will be understood that the upper pieces of wood 5 are not limited to these species, and these species are merely examples of wood species that are suitable for making the upper pieces of wood 5.
Although the size of the decay-resistant lower wood pieces 10 may vary according to the requirements of a particular application, the overall height “H1” (
With further reference to
The surfaces 11-16 of the frame members 2, 3, and 4 are preferably coated with a primer having moisture and weather-resistant properties. A preferred primer is a latex acrylic primer available from Sherwin-Williams. It will be understood that other suitable primers may be utilized, and this primer is simply an example of a suitable primer. The frame members 2, 3, and 4 may then be painted as required to provide a finished appearance that is appropriate for the house or other building structure in which the door frame 1 is installed. In general, door frame 1 is painted after it is installed in a building, but it could be pre-painted prior to installation. The upper pieces of wood 5 and lower pieces of wood 10 preferably have substantially similar properties with respect to absorption/adherence of primer and paint, such that the primer and/or paint form a durable, substantially uniform coating over the entire door frame 1. This provides a substantially uniform appearance without requiring special treatment of wood pieces 5 and/or 10. Also, because the wood pieces 5 and 10 have the same or similar properties with respect to absorption and/or adhesion of the primer and/or paint coating, the wood pieces 5 and 10 tend to retain a substantially similar appearance over time.
Referring again to
Moldings 20, 21, and 22 (
With reference to
The vertical mold pieces 20 and 22 preferably include a first wood species such as pine, or the like for the upper pieces 24, and the lower pieces 25 are preferably made of Alaskan yellow cedar (chamaecyparis nootkatensis) or other suitable wood having rot and decay resistance. In the illustrated example, the door frame 1 and the molding pieces 20-22 are both made of two different species of wood. However, it will be understood that the mold pieces 20 and 22 may be utilized with conventional door frames that do not include two different wood species. Also, the door frame 1 may be utilized with moldings made of palmer, or the like. Furthermore, although the moldings 20 and 22 are shown in connection with a door frame 1, it will be understood that the moldings 20 and 22 may be utilized to trim windows, or other structural features as required. Furthermore, if utilized for a window the like having a lower trim member (not shown), the lower trim member may be made entirely of Alaskan yellow cedar or the like. In this configuration, the uppermost trim member may be made of pine or the like, the vertical side trim members may be made of two different wood species joined together, and the lowermost trim member may be made entirely of a decay/rot resistance wood such as Alaskan yellow cedar.
The door frame and/or moldings or other components of the present invention are both cost-effective and weather resistant. The use of weather-resistant wood in the lower portions of the frame or other component (or other portions of the frame exposed to moisture, weather, and the like) alleviates the problems associated with the use of dissimilar frame materials. A wood frame or other building component constructed according to the present invention can be primed and painted in substantially the same manner as existing all wood frames, made of a single wood species. The frame and other components of the present invention are highly durable, yet very cost-effective due to the limited use of the more costly weather-resistant wood.
In the foregoing description, it will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the concepts disclosed herein. Such modifications are to be considered as included in the following claims, unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/887,256, filed on Jan. 30, 2007, entitled DOOR FRAME HAVING DURABLE WOOD PORTIONS, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2281864 | Toothacre | May 1940 | A |
2292301 | Smith | Aug 1942 | A |
2292806 | Toothcare | Aug 1942 | A |
2781559 | Savoie | Feb 1957 | A |
2854843 | Lamb | Oct 1958 | A |
2898642 | Etling | Aug 1959 | A |
3690082 | Byland | Sep 1972 | A |
3769773 | Mochizuki | Nov 1973 | A |
3808759 | Carmichael | May 1974 | A |
3812621 | Ragland | May 1974 | A |
3911548 | Perry | Oct 1975 | A |
4068433 | Glover | Jan 1978 | A |
4306821 | Moore | Dec 1981 | A |
4492496 | Arnold | Jan 1985 | A |
4509294 | Boilard | Apr 1985 | A |
4516365 | Chapman | May 1985 | A |
4543764 | Kozikowski | Oct 1985 | A |
4633616 | Giguere | Jan 1987 | A |
4644722 | Phillips | Feb 1987 | A |
4702057 | Phillips | Oct 1987 | A |
4779389 | Landers | Oct 1988 | A |
4823529 | Canfield et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4866901 | Sanchez | Sep 1989 | A |
4892601 | Norwood | Jan 1990 | A |
5022134 | George | Jun 1991 | A |
5074092 | Norlander | Dec 1991 | A |
5175973 | Owen et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5337469 | Richey | Aug 1994 | A |
5365708 | Winston | Nov 1994 | A |
5380131 | Crawford | Jan 1995 | A |
5426894 | Headrick | Jun 1995 | A |
5437130 | Raynak | Aug 1995 | A |
5501054 | Soltis et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5516236 | Williams et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524408 | Richey | Jun 1996 | A |
5546715 | Edstrom | Aug 1996 | A |
RE35322 | Owen et al. | Sep 1996 | E |
5553438 | Hsu | Sep 1996 | A |
5573354 | Koch | Nov 1996 | A |
5586796 | Fraser | Dec 1996 | A |
5588266 | Headrick | Dec 1996 | A |
5611173 | Headrick et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5649397 | Sander | Jul 1997 | A |
5661943 | Hagel | Sep 1997 | A |
5775041 | Tull et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5813800 | Doleshal | Sep 1998 | A |
5829920 | Christenson | Nov 1998 | A |
5873209 | Hagel | Feb 1999 | A |
5950391 | Hagel | Sep 1999 | A |
6098351 | Mills | Aug 2000 | A |
6122882 | Hagel | Sep 2000 | A |
6231931 | Blazey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6425222 | Hagel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6446410 | Hagel | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6694696 | Hagel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701984 | Lamontagne et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6837018 | Hagel et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6860071 | Weaber et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7100339 | Hagel | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7222587 | Hagel | May 2007 | B2 |
20020076275 | Hernandez et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020117272 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030005652 | Hagel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040206033 | Hagel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221523 | Hagel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050066608 | Stollenwerk et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
808 280 | Jul 1951 | DE |
1 121 309 | Jan 1962 | DE |
4002830 | Sep 1990 | DE |
0 466 292 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 550 089 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0 586 212 | Mar 1994 | EP |
1 007 816 | Jun 2000 | EP |
2 617 081 | Dec 1988 | FR |
2 652 298 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2 652 298 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2 112 437 | Jul 1983 | GB |
50-132102 | Oct 1975 | JP |
52-108270 | Aug 1977 | JP |
61-90978 | Jun 1986 | JP |
4-174186 | Jun 1992 | JP |
5-237921 | Sep 1993 | JP |
06088418 | Mar 1994 | JP |
7-91142 | Apr 1995 | JP |
8802254 | Sep 1988 | NL |
9102135 | Jul 1993 | NL |
1002780 | Jun 1997 | NL |
8900224 | Aug 1999 | NL |
WO 9811464 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 0049242 | Aug 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Chamaecyparis nootkatensis” Griffith, Randy Scott, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service published Jan. 1, 1992. |
Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, Gent. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin., Mar. 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080178553 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60887256 | Jan 2007 | US |