The present version of this invention relates generally to the field of improving security in doors.
This invention relates to improvements in security for doors, and more particularly to a device that helps prevent unwanted persons from entering a home or business. This device helps prevent unwanted persons from gaining access by improving the security of the standard door by using the door hinge and a dead bolt.
Burglary and forced entry unfortunately occur more often then we would care to think about. Many times criminals will kick in a door forcing the door knob from the frame of the door to gain access to the home or other building. It should be pointed out that when a door is forced open, many times the only thing keeping the door locked is the knob that sticks into the frame. It is relatively easy to break in a door in that only has a door knob locking it.
Some persons have used different devices to prevent unwanted access to homes and buildings. Some have used dead bolts which are typically mounted above or below the door knob. Dead bolts on the same side of the door as the door knob suffer from the same problem as the door knob itself. The framing that the door knob and the standard deadbolt engage is too thin to defer a seasoned attack by a persistent unwanted guest.
Some persons, then use multiple deadbolts or other means to discourage access. Multiple deadbolts require that the user thus have as many keys as deadbolts unless they are all keyed alike. Multiple deadbolts could mean multiple keys which are bulky, difficult to carry, and can be easily misplaced. If all the deadbolts are keyed the same, the intruder needs to only obtain one key to open the door and this defeats the purpose of multiple deadbolts.
Many other devices exist in the prior art to prevent unwanted access. Many of these are complicated, expensive, require time consuming retrofits, special skills to install, may be impracticable to the point that users don't use them and some just don't look very aesthetically appealing.
For the foregoing reasons, there is a need for a device that the average consumer could retro-fit to an existing door with commonly available tools or a manufacturer could easily include at the manufacturing level to enhance the security of the existing doors.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages inherent in the field of door security there is a need for a new type of device that can be relatively easily installed by the average consumer with common tools, does not look unattractive, is not overly complicated and enhances the security of the door.
A first object of this embodiment of the invention is to provide a device that enhances the security of a door.
Another object of this embodiment of the invention is to provide a device that can be relatively easily installed on existing doors.
It is another object of this embodiment of the invention is to have a device that can be installed by the average consumer with common tools.
It is yet another object of this embodiment of the invention to provide a device that looks relatively attractive and corresponds with the look that consumers are used to seeing on doors.
It is a still further object of this embodiment of the invention to provide a device that discourages the unwanted entrance through a door.
Another object of this embodiment of the invention is to provide a device that can be installed on newly manufactured doors.
These together with other objects of this invention, along with various features of novelty which characterize this invention, are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of this invention, its operating advantages and the specific objects attained by its uses, reference should be had to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which there is illustrated a preferred embodiment of this version of the invention.
The following patents disclose various embodiments of dead bolt locks. These dead bolt locks and actuation structure were well known in the background art at the time of this application filing. These patents are hereby incorporated by reference into this application since the relevant structure of this background art is presumed to be part of the knowledge of one having ordinary skill in the art. U.S. Pat. No. 1,846,364 Schlage, U.S. Pat. No. 2,042,021 Schlage, U.S. Pat. No. 3,606,422 Hennessy, U.S. Pat. No. 3,699,788 Gerlach et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,272,974 Hennessy, U.S. Pat. No. 4,593,542 Rotondi et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,656,849 Rotondi et al, U.S. Pat. No. 5,765,412 Koskela et al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,523,375 Beatty.
Referring to the drawings in detail wherein like elements are indicated by like numerals, there is shown in
Once the receiver 20 is seated in the hole, fasteners f1 can be used to secure the receiver in the frame F and stud S.
Likewise,
In this embodiment, a chamfer 42 is cut at the first end 19 so that when the first end is pounded into the stud S, the chamfer 42 cuts into the stud S which fills the receiver 20 substantially as shown.
Likewise door plate 24 could also have a receiver sleeve (not shown) similar to receiver 20 to strengthen the lock 11. The receiver sleeve would extend from the door plate 24 to near the cross member 15,
It should be noted that any of the first end 19 embodiments shown could be used with any combination of the receiver 20, either the two piece embodiments as shown in
The frame plate 22 could be the standard hinge that had been installed on a pre-existing door. If this were the case, the user would need to drill a hole through both the frame plate 22 and the door plate 24 at a specific location. Preferably, a new hinge would be provided with pre-drilled frame and door holes 32, 30 through both the frame plate 22 and the door plate 24. The user could then remove the existing hinge and replace it with the new hinge 18. A replacement hinge 18 would aid in alignment and installation with the other components of the lock 11.
As the key is turned in the key way 34 of the dead bolt 14, the rod 16 moves from within the door D or first position 36 through the door plate 24, the frame plate 22 and into the receiver 20 to a second position 38. In the second position 38, the rod 16 is contained partly within the door D and through the door plate 24, frame plate 22 and partly within the receiver 20, best shown in
Once the maximum distance is reached, the user removes the key from the dead bolt 14, the rod is housed in the receiver 20 and the lock 11 severely discourages the door D from opening unless one has a key or someone is inside to open the lock 11.
If some unwanted person was to try to open the door D with the rod 16 housed in the receiver 20, they would have to break the rod 16 and receiver 20 through the frame and the stud S. Alternatively, with respect to
If a person is on the inside of the door, the handle 28 can be turned and the rod 16 is removed from the receiver 20 (or second position 38), then the frame plate 22, and the door plate 24 to reside within the door D (First position 36). The door D can then be opened and closed as a normal door is; provided no other security devices are being utilized. Other handles or even a keyed handle 28 could be used on the interior of the door also.
A person could also gain entry of a locked door D with a lock 11 installed by inserting the key into the dead bolt 14 and turning the dead bolt to remove the rod 16 from the receiver 20 or second position 38, frame plate 22, and door plate 24 to be housed within the door D, first position 36. The door would then operate as a normal door provided the user has installed no other security devices.
As an alternative, the dead bolt 14 could have a handle (not shown) and combination lock (not shown) installed replacing the key way 34 of the dead bolt 14, or a magnetic card and slot (neither shown) and many other devices for restricting access to specific persons that are known in the art.
It will now be apparent to those skilled in the art that other embodiments, improvements, details and uses can be made consistent with the letter and spirit of the foregoing disclosure and within the scope of this patent, which is limited only by the following claims, construed in accordance with the patent law, including the doctrine of equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/377,807 filed on May 6, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1340398 | O'Brien | May 1920 | A |
1846364 | Schlage | Feb 1932 | A |
1965723 | Rupp | Jul 1934 | A |
2042021 | Schlage | May 1936 | A |
2584088 | Floyd | Jan 1952 | A |
3336769 | Russell et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3606422 | Hennessy | Sep 1971 | A |
3699788 | Aerlachetal | Oct 1972 | A |
3811150 | Chalmers | May 1974 | A |
3899905 | Walters | Aug 1975 | A |
4272974 | Hennessy | Jun 1981 | A |
4288944 | Donovan | Sep 1981 | A |
4593542 | Rotondi et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4656849 | Rotondi et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4823510 | Amos | Apr 1989 | A |
5154461 | Prescott et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5427422 | Madlener et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5765412 | Koskela et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769473 | Sovis | Jun 1998 | A |
6431621 | De Groot | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6523375 | Beatty | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60377807 | May 2002 | US |