The invention relates to a door hinge for a vehicle door, comprising a first and a second hinge half, each of which can alternatively be fastened to one of the door assembly parts door and door pillar; a hinge pin which connects the first and the second hinge halves pivotably to each other; a first guiding arrangement which is formed on one of the first and second hinge halves and is intended for securing at least one holding position for the door hinge; a first free end of a spring element secured on the other of the first and second hinge halves, which free end interacts with the first guiding arrangement; a second guiding arrangement which is formed on the one hinge half and is intended for securing at least one holding position for the door hinge; and a second free end of a spring element secured on the other hinge half, which end interacts with the second guiding arrangement.
DE-A-32 23 938 describes a door-securing means which is combined with a hinge and has a torsion bar spring secured on one hinge half, both ends of which spring are provided with running rollers which roll against two differently configured curved sections of the other hinge half, the curved sections defining different latching positions by means of latching depressions and cams. The known door-securing means has a series of deficiencies which have an adverse effect on its practical use. For example, in order for the door-securing means to function, a first cam plate on the one side of the pivot axis has to be acted upon while the other cam plate on the opposite side with regard to the hinge axis, acts upon a cam plate. This is necessary since the torsion bar spring would otherwise not be stressed. This causes moments to act on the hinge as a whole transversely to the pivot axis because of the prestressing of the torsion bar spring, said moments leading to increased wear of the hinge pin and to noisy running characteristics. Since the one end of the torsion bar spring bears on the rear side against the corresponding cam plate, the first hinge half has to be arranged near to one end side of the vehicle door so that the end with the running roller provided on it can reach behind the stop surface of the first hinge half. This leads at the same time to a nonuniform deformation of the two ends of the torsion bar spring, the ends being of different lengths as a result and causing different loads on the curved paths. A further disadvantage resides in the fact that the cam plates of the other hinge half are essentially arranged centrally, as a result of which a corresponding opening has to be provided in the first hinge half in order to allow them to pass through there. Finally, the necessary forces require a large lever between the mounting of the spring and its ends, and therefore cause larger hinge halves than necessary.
EP-B-0 338 348 describes a door hinge which connects a first hinge half and a second hinge half pivotably to each other via a hinge pin, the first hinge half having an opening in which the two ends of a torsion bar spring are fixed. The torsion bar spring has a design similar to a large B, there being arranged on the spring element, opposite the two free ends, a running roller which is intended to come to bear against an extension, which is connected in a rotationally fixed manner to the second hinge half, in order to act upon said extension in the region of a cam path. In this case, the spring element is held on that side of the first hinge half which faces the door assembly part, and extends with the latching roller a good distance beyond the region of the first hinge half in order to come into engagement with the guiding arrangement. The forces transmitted to the guiding arrangement are only small and have unfavorable lever ratios. In particular, the first hinge half has to be arranged close to one edge of the door assembly part, and has to be configured to be comparatively large in size. Also, the second hinge half has merely one single guiding arrangement which defines corresponding latching positions.
DE-A-12 30 328 describes a door-securing means for a door hinge, in which a spring element comprising a torsion bar is secured via a flat wire clamp on a strut of a first door assembly part where it takes on the function of a first hinge half whereas there is a curved path on a hinge reinforcement of the other door assembly part, said curved path defining a section of the torsion wire of the guiding arrangement, which section is configured in the manner of a spring fork. Moments occur transversely with respect to the hinge axis because the door-securing means is arranged outside the actual door hinge. The flat wire clamps are configured in such a manner that they secure a first section of the torsion wire parallel to the spring fork and secure a second section of the torsion wire essentially parallel to the legs of the U-shaped spring fork after said torsion wire has been bent around three corners.
DE-A-198 11 108 describes a door hinge which connects two hinge halves in an articulated manner via a hinge pin and secures latching positions of the hinge halves with respect to one another via an S-shaped spring element by the free spring end thereof gripping a profiled guiding arrangement of one of the spring halves. The disadvantage in the case of the known door hinge is its large space requirement since the guiding arrangement, which can have a contour defining a number of latching marks, is to be arranged at a certain distance from the hinge pin defining the pivot axis of the hinge, in order to ensure reliable transmission of the spring forces to the guiding arrangement. This distance, which is defined by the spring force to be set, defines the installation depth of the hinge, which depth in turn limits the dimensions of the beam to which the pillar-side hinge half is to be fastened. In addition, the one-sided load because of the spring element causes moments acting transversely with respect to the pivot axis of the door hinge, as a result of which the door hinge has a tendency to tilt and thus to become jammed.
It is an object of the invention to provide a door hinge which reliably permits, with a compact construction, the door hinge to be secured while avoiding moments acting transversely with respect to the pivot axis.
The present invention provides that the first force end and the second free end are arranged in each case in a mirror-inverted manner with respect to each other on the other hinge half.
The door hinge according to the invention has a first guiding arrangement and a second guiding arrangement, a free end of a spring element secured on the other hinge half interacting with each of the two guiding arrangements and making it possible for the door hinge to be guided and secured by latching during opening and during closing. Consequently, spring forces are doubly transmitted to one guiding arrangement in each case and therefore to the one hinge half, and hence the provision of two free ends of spring elements which transmit the forces means that the holding forces of said spring elements need to be designed to be less strong in each case and it is therefore possible to provide the guiding arrangements at a smaller distance from the hinge pin. The door hinge according to the invention can therefore be configured to be small in structure, and can be advantageously used even when there is restricted installation space available, in particular with regard to the installation width which is available. It is obvious that in principle the distance of the first or second guiding arrangement from the hinge pin may be selected differently, but expediently the same distance is selected. According to the invention, the two spring elements are arranged in an essentially mirror-inverted manner on the other hinge half, with the result that they generate the same forces because of their stress, and mutually neutralize any laterally acting forces, in particular moments transversely with respect to the pivot axis of the two hinge halves.
The first and the second guiding arrangements are preferably designed in a mirror-inverted manner with respect to each other, at least with regard to a feature concerning the securing of the door hinge. This makes it possible in a simple manner to uniformly select for both guiding arrangements the same latching angle for the door to be fastened to the door hinge, the same forces with regard to the opening or closing of the door hinge or else the distance of the contour of the guiding arrangements from the hinge pin.
Nevertheless, other features which are not important for the securing of the door hinge can be designed such that they differ and are not mirror-inverted. It is therefore possible, for example, that the flat sides which do not grip the free ends of the spring elements have different surface structures in the region of the guiding arrangement.
The first free end and the second free end preferably belong to the same spring element which, unlike known door hinges having a spring element for securing purposes, is not secured to a free end in the other hinge half, but approximately in its central region. By this means, it is ensured, by means of the single-piece design of the spring element and therefore the uniform selection of the material, that the prestresses acting on the two ends are essentially the same size. The two legs of the spring element which connect the two free ends to the central region are expediently designed to be of the same length.
Each free end of the spring element is expediently prestressed by a sleeve being arranged, for example, in the region of the leg in the other hinge half, which sleeve supports said leg and is arranged in a position which is raised with respect to the plane formed by the central region and the free end and therefore ensures prestressing of the free end. The prestress required for securing a motor vehicle door can advantageously be obtained thereby, in which case the two free ends remain on the same side of a hinge half.
The central region of the spring element is expediently held in a clamping manner in a clamping unit in the other hinge half and, in particular, is prevented from shifting in the direction of the holder of the legs in the sleeves. The central region, which is grasped in the clamping unit, and that section of the leg which is guided in the sleeve are expediently orientated essentially parallel to each other in order to secure rotational locking about the section of the leg in the sleeve, in which case it is furthermore preferably also for the free end of the spring element to again run parallel to the two abovementioned parts. However, it is not a problem if a deviation from the parallelism of a few degrees has to be taken into consideration because of the prestressing of the spring element and the fixing to the respective hinge halves. For the case in which the two free ends belong to two spring elements, it is possible to hold the respective other end thereof in a common clamping unit or adjacently in clamping units of the other hinge half. The clamping unit can then also be designed as a blind hole or the like. However, the advantage of the single-piece design of the spring element is that axial slipping is avoided by an expedient determination of the held or guided sections of the spring element and the bearing of the free ends against the guiding arrangement is ensured.
Preferably, the two legs of the spring element essentially have together the contour of three leaves of a three-leaf clover leaf, it being possible also to explain this contour as an implied, outlined T. The two free ends of the spring element, i.e. its end surfaces, face each other. The free ends are at a small distance from the hinge pin, and therefore enable a compact construction of the door hinge.
It is possible in principle for the first and the second guiding arrangements in each case to define different latching positions for the door hinge, with the result that each of the first and second guiding arrangements defines by itself one latching position in each case for the door hinge, in which case a relatively high latching force has to be overcome if both guiding arrangements define the same latching position and a relatively small latching force has to be overcome if only one of the two guiding arrangements defines a latching position. However, it is preferred for both guiding arrangements to select the same latching positions because the door hinge is uniformly loaded thereby and the tilting tendency is thereby reduced.
In addition to the latching positions which are preset by the guiding arrangements, the maximum opening angle can advantageously be defined by a stop on account of projections of the hinge halves which strike against each other when the preset, maximum opening angle is reached. It is likewise possible, for safety reasons, to likewise provide a mutual striking of the hinge halves for the closing position. The stops, which mutually lock the hinge halves mechanically, can advantageously be combined with one another by latching positions of the guiding arrangements close to the end position in such a manner that the door is held fixedly in its maximum opening angle of, for example, 70°.
According to a first preferred development of the door hinge according to the invention, at least one, and preferably both, of the first and second guiding arrangements is/are designed as a latching arrangement which has at least one latching roller which defines a latching holding position for that free end of the spring element which is assigned to the at least one guiding arrangement. The latching rollers are mounted about a rotational axis on the outwardly directed flat side which extends essentially parallel to the profile of the free end of the spring element and the circumference of which is, together with projections, non-circular in terms of circumference. Recesses are provided in the projections of the latching rollers, the radius of which recesses corresponds essentially to the circumferential radius of the free end of the spring element such that the latching rollers are entrained by the free end when it passes by. Each latching roller preferably defines a latching position, so that the number of the latching rollers essentially corresponds to the number of latching positions. The design of the guiding arrangement as the latching arrangement with latching rollers has the advantage that high forces to be overcome can thereby be set in a simple manner, and also the wear of the free end of the spring element is low on account of the entrained guide. Furthermore, it is particularly simple with latching rollers to hold the two spring elements in different latching positions.
According to a second preferred development of the door hinge according to the invention, at least one, and preferably both, of the first and second guiding arrangements has a profiled contour which has at least one depression which defines a latching position for that end of the spring element which is assigned to the at least one guiding arrangement. The contour which is formed in a narrow side of the one hinge half is therefore a guide for the free end of the assigned spring element. According to this preferred development, it is possible, in particular, only to form one of the two guiding arrangements in a profiled manner and to permit the latter, having the spring element assigned to it, to apply the holding forces, while the other guiding arrangement, having the spring element assigned to it, has a nonprofiled contour over which the free end can slide without changes in the prestress of the spring element. This variant is particularly preferred if, simultaneously with a latching position based on the first-mentioned, profiled contour, a change in the actuating force, which is required in order to move the door hinge, is to be set, for example by a progressive configuration of the contour not designed with depressions. Since the holding forces are composed in a first approach additively from the holding forces of the two spring elements, it is possible, by the combination of two different guiding arrangements or, preferably, by two identical guiding arrangements having an identical, profiled contour, for a resultant force to be set by which the hinge halves are mutually secured.
The free end of the spring element expediently has a running roller which is arranged rotatably on the free end and which can roll against the profiled contour, for example, and is prestressed against the guiding arrangement because of the prestress of the spring element. The running roller is, for example, a sintered material which can also be oil-impregnated in order to reduce the susceptibility to wear.
It is obvious that the combination of the two preferred developments of the door hinge according to the invention in a door hinge is, in principle, also possible.
According to a particularly preferred feature of the invention, the profiled contour of the guiding arrangement can be formed by an insert part which is inserted into the one hinge half. In this case, the insert part can be held fixedly in the one hinge half by bonding, welding, soldering or preferably by form-fitting clamping, any type of form-fitting or frictional connection being suitable in principle for the connection. The provision of an insert part to be fitted together with the hinge half advantageously opens up a way of hardening, for example by induction hardening, this contour, which is subject to particular stress because of the prestress of the spring element, irrespective of the hinge half which receives the insert part, the volumes and weights which are to be handled of the insert part being significantly smaller in comparison with the overall hinge half and therefore causing fewer costs. In addition to the profiling for the interaction with the free end of the spring element, the insert part preferably also has a further profiling which is designed such that it fits together with a corresponding mating profiling of the hinge half, with the result that the two parts mentioned can be plugged together or calked without using a great force in the manner of a plug and plug-in sleeve. It can be seen that not only is the machining process for the hardening of the contour thereby restricted only to the insert part, but that a standardized hinge half can be used the latching positions of which can be provided by an interchangeable contour in the insert part, depending on requirements in each case. The hinge half can therefore be realized, for example, as a sheet-metal part or as a part which is produced in an inexpensive mass production process, while the insert part is selected from a material of higher quality for the contact with the spring element and is profiled in accordance with the desired latching positions. For the configuration with two guiding arrangements, in particular, the provision of insert parts is also a significant advantage in terms of cost in comparison with the machining and induction hardening of the one hinge half itself. It is obvious that when an insert part is provided, surface hardening in the form of a coating, for example with TiN or TiC, is also possible, which coating would be extremely costly for the entire hinge half. Also, insert parts, which are relied on very particularly for the functioning of the door hinge, can be checked with regard to their quality substantially more easily. It is also possible, when the guiding arrangement is provided by means of the insert part, to further reduce the structural space required for the door hinge because minimum dimensions which are otherwise required for the machining of the hinge half do not have to be kept to and are not taken into consideration in an insert part inserted subsequently.
Each of the two hinge halves preferably has two end joints or gudgeons which are in each case connected in an articulated manner to one another by a hinge pin or alternatively by two hinge-pin stubs, the two joints of the one hinge half being arranged between those of the other hinge half, as a result of which symmetrical moments can be set again.
Further advantages and features emerge from the following description and from the dependent claims.
The invention will be explained in greater detail below using preferred exemplary embodiments of a door hinge according to the invention and by reference to the attached drawings.
The door hinge 1 shown in
The first hinge half 2 has fastening tabs 5a, 5b which are directed outward on both sides, in each case have a hole 6 passing through them and are intended for the fastening of the hinge half 2 to the door pillar of a motor vehicle body. The end-joint region in each case with a gudgeon of the first hinge half projects respectively at right angles from the two fastening tabs 5 and is adjoined in each case by a protruding extension 7, the two extensions being connected to each other via a crosspiece 8 which is bent off at right angles from them. The crosspiece 8 is, for example, welded together in its center from two bent-off sections of the extension 7. The first hinge half is of essentially mirror-symmetrical design, and for this reason individual identification in each case of the first and the second of the two mirror-symmetrical parts is omitted below.
The second hinge half 3 has a flat fastening part 9 for fastening to the door, which fastening part has two holes 10 passing through it. The fastening part 9 is bent over through approximately 200° at its end edge which faces away from the hinge pin 4 where it defines an (upwardly closed) clamping unit 11. At the two edges of the stop part 9 which are arranged perpendicularly with respect to the edge of the clamping unit 11, the edge is likewise bent over, but only by approximately 90°, the bent-over sections 12 having a passage in which a U-shaped sleeve 13 is inserted, the extension of the two bent-over sections 12 continuing as the end joints 14 of the second hinge half 3, which engage in each case around the outside of the end-joint surfaces of the first hinge half 2. A narrow bent-over section 15 which is formed on the edge lying opposite the clamping unit 11 has a smaller width than the distance of the two mutually facing surfaces of the extensions 7, and can in principle be pivoted through the latter.
A spring element which is designed as a torsion spring 16 is held in a clamping manner by its central region 17 in the clamping unit 11 of the second hinge half 3, the torsion spring 16, as can readily be seen in particular in
In the case of the door hinge 1, an insert part 20 is clamped in each case in the extension 7 of the first hinge half 2 by calking, the insert part 20 and the extension 7 essentially having the same thickness, with the result that the narrow side which faces the torsion spring 16 defines a first or a second guiding arrangement for one of the free ends 19 in each case of the torsion spring 16. In the present exemplary embodiment, in the case of the closed installation position which is illustrated in
During pivoting of the two hinge halves 2, 3 relative to each other the door hinge 1 is held in specified opening positions by the free ends 19 of the torsion spring 16 being latched in each case into the latching positions 21a, 21b, in which case it should be noted that the installation space taken up by the door hinge 1 is exceedingly small, since the distance of the fastening surface of the second hinge half 3 from the hinge pin 4 is small because of the compact design of the extension 7 with its profiling 21, which is realized here by an insert part 20. The provision of a torsion spring 16 with two free ends 19 which are in engagement with the profiling 21 enables the radius for obtaining a defined holding force to be selected to be correspondingly smaller and therefore closer to the hinge pin.
It is obvious that instead of an insert part 20 the extension 7 can also be designed with the profiling 21, in which case the insert part 20 is then superfluous and the extension 7 together with its profiling defines the first and the second guiding arrangement by itself.
The second door hinge 1′, which is illustrated in
The door hinge 1′ likewise comprises a first hinge half 2 and a second hinge half 3, which are basically configured in the same manner as in the previous exemplary embodiment, and which are likewise designed with a torsion spring 16.
The extensions 7 of the first hinge half 2 do not have any insert parts, but mountings for two latching rollers 30, 31 are in each case formed on their outwardly directed flat sides which are orientated essentially parallel to the free end 19, which does not have a running roller here, or to the hinge pin 4. It can be seen that the extension 7 also has a profiling 21, but this is not intended to come into engagement with the free end 19 of the torsion spring 16, but rather is defined on the basis of the position of the latching rollers 30, 31. During pivoting of the two hinge halves 2, 3 relative to each other for the purpose of opening a vehicle door, a region of the leg 18, which region is situated somewhat above the end side of the free end 19, comes to bear against an inwardly directed recess 30a in a projection of the latching roller 30, and during the further opening movement of the door hinge 1′ is guided by the rotational movement of the latching roller 30 about its own axis by the recess 30a, the radius of the recess 30a being matched to the radius of the leg 18 of the torsion spring 16. In the region 33, which defines a first latching position, the torsion spring 16 is transferred from the first latching roller 30 to the second latching roller 31 which likewise has a recess 31a of the above-described type in order in turn to be able to pass with further guidance into a second latching region 34 close to the end stop. During the closing movement of the motor vehicle door the same stations are passed through in the same sequence.
As can be seen in particular in
The invention has been described above referring to two preferred exemplary embodiments, in which the first and the second free ends 19 are both ends of the same spring element 16. However, it is possible to provide two torsion springs instead of a single torsion spring, each of which engages with a free end of the associated guiding arrangement 7, 20 or 7, 30, 31.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
199 49 647 | Oct 1999 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTDE00/03555 | 10/7/2000 | WO | 00 | 7/29/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0127424 | 4/19/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3065497 | Faber | Nov 1962 | A |
3370317 | Marchione | Feb 1968 | A |
3820192 | Nakano et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3911529 | Pringle | Oct 1975 | A |
3931664 | Nakano et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4266321 | Pelchat et al. | May 1981 | A |
4332055 | Rudnick et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4428096 | Kaspar | Jan 1984 | A |
4536918 | Brockhaus | Aug 1985 | A |
4738003 | Mori et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4807331 | Calucci | Feb 1989 | A |
4815164 | Rottinghaus | Mar 1989 | A |
4864687 | Calcaterra et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4932101 | Lualdi | Jun 1990 | A |
5018243 | Anspaugh et al. | May 1991 | A |
5074010 | Gignac et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5226202 | Griffins | Jul 1993 | A |
5235726 | Geier et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5524324 | Kunkel | Jun 1996 | A |
5575037 | Tolle et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5675869 | Lotz | Oct 1997 | A |
5791017 | Kluting | Aug 1998 | A |
5794309 | Lotz | Aug 1998 | A |
5850673 | Wood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6125508 | Formenti | Oct 2000 | A |
6549859 | Ward | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6568741 | Leung et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1230328 | Dec 1966 | DE |
2015147 | Oct 1970 | DE |
3223938 | Dec 1983 | DE |
68903867 | Oct 1989 | DE |
19811108 | Feb 1999 | DE |
0338348 | Oct 1989 | EP |
2155540 | Sep 1985 | GB |