Not Applicable
Not Applicable
1. Field of the Invention
This apparatus relates to the reinforcement of doorways to prevent damage to and forced entry through the doorway by anchoring the apparatus to the framing studs of the wall, which are structural part of the building in which the door resides and define the location of the door, with the use of threaded fasteners, while facilitating the manual movement of the closure. The apparatus is inserted in the doorway door jamb by attachment to the framing studs and possesses the means particularly adapted for cooperation with opening or closing movement of a door latching mechanism. The nature of the apparatus allows for the latching and locking mechanisms of the door to pass through the apparatus. The apparatus assists in restraining the latching and locking mechanisms by increasing the overall strength of the door jamb through the addition of the apparatus which is anchored all the way through the door jamb to the framing studs with the use of threaded fasteners. This increases the amount of material that would need to be strained before the door jamb would give way in the event that the bolt is forced back by extraneous means. In addition, the apparatus prevents damage to the closure. The apparatus can also be used to repair damaged door jambs by holding the damaged parts together while strengthening the damaged region.
The apparatus specifically addresses deficiencies of prior art in the area by offering an alternative means to reinforce the door, while facilitating the latching mechanism of the door, allowing for easy installation, and does not require disassembly of the decorative molding or destruction of existing wallboard.
2. Background of the Invention
The apparatus was developed to counteract the growing threat of break-ins which are made easier by the abundant use of pre-hung entry doors with wooden jambs. Many of the jambs are built from forger jointed wood which is not sturdy enough to withstand a forced entry blow, especially to the area in and around the latching and locking mechanisms.
Several attempts have been made to develop a reinforcing mechanism for door jambs but all involve either reinforcement of the door by extending a plate around the edge of the door jamb from the locking and latching mechanisms receiving edge, the attachment of multiple pieces to the door jamb, the interference with the easy operation of the door's latching and locking mechanisms, or the disassembly and reassembly of the decorative molding and/or wallboard for proper installation.
In U.S. Pat. App. 20030159361, Yeremian discloses a reinforced door jamb where two plates are used to reinforce the door. Installation of the plates involves cutting open the wallboard to expose the interior side of the door jamb. The decorative molding and wallboard must be removed in order to attach the plates for reinforcing the door latch and bolt.
In U.S. Pat. App. 20030062731, Richmond et al. discloses an L-shaped elongated piece of steel which is secured to the door jamb area by removing the decorative molding and attaching tabs which comprise one part of the L-shaped elongated piece to the wall. The other portion of the L-shaped elongated piece protects the door jamb area that receives the latching and locking bolts.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,070,650, Anderson discloses two elongated metal plates, the first to be mounted to the door jamb latch and lock bolt receiving portion, while the second plate overlays the first plate and forms an “L” shape so that it is fitted beneath the decorative molding. Anderson's apparatus reinforces the door frame because of the “L” shape which requires the removal of the wallboard from around the door frame, as well as the door jamb, in order to achieve a forced entry. Anderson does not teach that the screws used to attach the plates in place add any structural integrity to the apparatus and may require the decorative molding be detached in order to facilitate installation.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,566,509, Long discloses an elongated L-shaped piece of steel which is attached to the door jamb latch and lock bolt receiving portion of the door jamb, where the L-shaped portion is bent around the edge of the door jamb toward but not underneath the decorative molding. With this disclosure, and other L-shaped disclosures, the door is prevented from closing properly because the latching mechanism is not fed into the latch receiving portion of the door jamb as the door approaches the door jamb but instead rams against the L-shaped portion. In addition, given that the distance between the edge of the door jamb and the decorative molding may not be consistent, in order for Long's description to be accurate, the short leg portion may need to be modified in order not to interfere with the decorative molding.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,085,465, Olberding discloses a striker plate that includes a projection from the plate that extends from the plate against the outside edge of the door jamb along the wall thus increasing the strength of the door jamb by requiring the force to open the door to exceed the strength of the material around the receiving hole, the edge of the door jamb and that portion of the wall beneath the projection. The reinforcement over the projection adds additional resistance against the force by increasing the area along the outside wall that must also be removed before the door may be forced open. To install this system, the decorative molding and wallboard must be removed from the existing door frames, then a reinforcement plate is installed over the framing studs, with wallboard and decorative molding being reinstalled after the system's installation. Olberding does not teach that the screws used to attach the system to the door jamb penetrate through to the framing studs or that the screws provide any added reinforcement to the system.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,085,465, Olberding et al. in view of U.S. Pat. No. 5,070,650, Anderson, a single metal plate with a front face, back face, formed portion and angled portion is disclosed wherein the apparatus may be anchored to the framing studs. However, Olberding in view of Anderson requires that the angled portion be present to supply the actual resistant force from the forced entry of the doorway. In the present invention as claimed, the angled portion is not necessary to supply the additional resistant force, thus distinguishing the present invention as claimed from Olberding in view of Anderson.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,858,384 Blankenship discloses and “L” shaped reinforcement plate that overlaps the inside of a door jamb and the front of a door jamb. Blankenship teaches only to anchoring to the door jamb and not to the framing studs.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,635,399 Gehrke discloses a door jamb support includes an L-shaped reinforcing plate with adjustment features to enable the reinforcing support plate to accommodate variances in the design of and in the position of door handle latches in doors. Gehrke does not teach to anchoring the reinforcing plate to the framing studs.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,176,527 Bench discloses a locking mechanism and a receiver to the bolt from the locking mechanism. The receiver is a tube that extends into the masonry surrounding the door frame. The increased resistance to forced entry is derived from the receiver penetrating into the surrounding masonry. Bench does not teach to reinforcing the door frame itself and only teaches to masonry structures.
An apparatus for reinforcing door jambs to prevent forced entry through the doorway by strengthening the composite materials of the door jamb. The composite materials are strengthened through the addition of the apparatus as well as the anchoring of the apparatus through the door jamb and into the framing studs with the use of threaded fasteners. The preferred embodiment of the apparatus is made of 14 gauge ASTM, A-36, Mild Steel with rectangular holes through which the latching and locking mechanisms of the door may pass, as well as smaller beveled fastening holes into which threaded fasteners attach the apparatus to the door jamb by passing through the door jamb into the framing studs. Installation of the apparatus does not require the removal of or interfere with the decorative molding or wallboard surrounding the doorway. Further, the apparatus is also formed so as to facilitate door latching mechanism closure. This apparatus can also be used to assist in the repair of damaged door jambs by securing the damaged portions once they are placed back in position.
An apparatus A to prevent forced entry consisting of: a single piece of resistant material, front face, back face, a formed edge that bends in from the plane of the rest of the front face, fastening holes to allow the attachment of the apparatus to the door jamb by passing through the door jamb into the framing studs, which are a structural part of the building in which the door resides and define the location of the door, and rectangular holes through the apparatus to allow the latching and locking mechanisms to pass through. The preferred embodiment of the apparatus, as detailed in
The apparatus is made by form pressing a piece of 14-gauge ASTM, A-36, Mild Steel 4 of the appropriate length to shape it and create rectangular holes 6 and 7 and fastening holes 8 as detailed in the preferred embodiment. Then, the apparatus is either coated with a desired color using powder-based paint or left uncoated.
The apparatus is attached to a door jamb 14 along the latching or locking mechanism receiving side of the door jamb 14, abutting the door jamb stop 16, using threaded fasteners, typically 3 inch #8 beveled flathead screws (See
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/803,301 filed May 14, 2007 now abandoned. The benefit of the earlier filing date of the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/803,301 is hereby claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4635399 | Gehrke et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4858384 | Blankenship | Aug 1989 | A |
5070650 | Anderson | Dec 1991 | A |
5566509 | Long | Oct 1996 | A |
6085465 | Olberding et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6176527 | Bench | Jan 2001 | B1 |
20030062731 | Richmond et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030159361 | Yeremian | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100282138 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11803301 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 12802808 | US |