This is a national stage application filed under 35 USC 371 based on International Application No. PCT/FI2008/050173 filed Apr. 9, 2008, and claims priority under 35 USC 119 of Finnish Patent Application No. FI 20075296, filed Apr. 27, 2007.
This invention relates to a door lock with a dual-action bolt, the dual-action bolt comprising a body part fitted with a shaft in the longitudinal direction of the front plate of the door lock, as well as two bolt pieces that are pivotably supported on the body part around its shaft.
In many applications, a door lock must allow the door to be opened by pushing it in either direction when the deadbolting means of the door lock are in the passive state. Deadbolting means refer to means within the lock that can be used to lock the bolt in the deadbolting position. In the deadbolting position, the bolt is in a position protruding out from the lock body.
In this and other applications, the door lock comprises a dual-action bolt with two bolt pieces. Both bolt pieces are so-called bevelled bolts; that is, they have a bevelled surface that contacts a striker plate when the door is closed, making the bevelled bolt go into the lock body. The bolt pieces are pivotably fitted to the body of the dual-action body so that the bolt pieces always form a bevelled surface that contacts the striker plate when the door is turned shut, regardless of the direction in which the door is turned.
Both bolt pieces also have a projection 8 in the longitudinal direction of the shaft 4 directed away from the bolt body part 3. The projections have a counter surface 9 that is arranged to cooperate with the inner surface of the front plate of the door lock. When the dual-action bolt protrudes out from the lock body to the protruding position, the counter surface 9 of the projection in either bolt piece contacts the inner surface of the front plate (in
The problem with a door lock having a dual-action bolt is that in operation, the bolt pieces 2 tend to turn away from each other in the vertical direction. Turning of the bolt pieces causes uneven wear in the shaft 4, both in the shaft journal and the shaft bore. This expands the gap 11 between the bolt pieces, and the end edges 10 of the bolt pieces chafe against the edges of the bolt opening in the front plate. Chafing of the end edges against the edges of the bolt openings hampers the operation of the lock and may even cause a malfunction as the bolt no longer moves properly in and out of the lock body. Furthermore, when opening/closing the door, the force is initially imposed primarily on one of the bolt pieces, due to which the body of the bolt tends to turn within the lock body. This turning must be taken into account in the other structures of the lock in order to ensure flawless operation.
The objective of the invention is to reduce the turning of the bolt pieces of a dual-action bolt away from each other. The objective will be achieved as described in the independent claim. The dependent claims describe various embodiments of the invention.
The inventive idea is that unwanted turning of the bolt pieces can be reduced or even completely prevented if the bolt pieces also have another projection that is arranged to cooperate with the inner surface of the front plate. In relation to the support of the bolt piece on the shaft, the second projection is arranged on the opposite side in the axial direction compared to said away-facing projection. The second projection has a second counter surface that is arranged to cooperate with the inner surface of the front plate.
In the following, the invention is described in more detail by reference to the enclosed drawings, where
The door lock further comprises deadbolting means 17 that can be moved to a deadbolting position in which they prevent the dual-action bolt from being moved from the protruding position to the withdrawn position in the lock body 14. The deadbolting means in the example of
The door lock also usually comprises control means for controlling the deadbolting means. The lock may have an electrically controlled solenoid 20, an auxiliary bolt 19 and/or control spindle means 18. The auxiliary bolt prevents the bolt from moving to deadbolting position when the door is open but allows it when the door is closed. The control spindle means 18 comprises, for example, a cylinder body, a handle and/or a knob. The connection from the control spindle means and auxiliary bolt to the roller 17A within the deadbolting means is simply marked with dashed lines. The solenoid 20 is linked to the roller 17A through the solenoid spindle.
FIGS. 4 and 5A-5D illustrate the dual-action bolt of the door lock according to the invention.
The bolt pieces comprise a projection 24 facing away from the body part 22 in the longitudinal direction of the shaft 29, said projection having a counter surface 25 arranged to cooperate with the inner surface 30 of the front plate. Both bolt pieces also comprise a second projection 26 which, in relation to the support 27, 28 of the bolt piece on the shaft, is arranged on the opposite side in the direction of the shaft 29 compared to said away-facing projection 24. The second projection has a second counter surface 31 that is arranged to cooperate with the inner surface 30 of the front plate.
Because the dual-action bolt is spring-loaded towards the protruding position, the counter surfaces 25, 31 turn the bolt pieces to crosswise positions (
At least one of the corners of the outward-facing projections 24 and the second projections 26 of the bolt pieces 23 is rounded. Rounding of the corner or corners aims to reduce wear and tear due to operation.
The figures show that both bolt parts have a bore 32 for the body shaft 29 (
It is clear that a door lock according to the invention can also be implemented with types of dual-action bolts other than those illustrated in the figures. For example, the side of the body part 22 facing the locking means 17 can be shaped differently. Therefore any inventive embodiment can be implemented within the scope of the inventive idea.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20075296 | Apr 2007 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2008/050173 | 4/9/2008 | WO | 00 | 10/26/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/132273 | 11/6/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2209551 | Anderson | Jul 1940 | A |
3361464 | Foster | Jan 1968 | A |
4902053 | Hakkarainen et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5113676 | Panossian | May 1992 | A |
5249831 | Maniaci | Oct 1993 | A |
5311168 | Pease et al. | May 1994 | A |
5498037 | Fan Lai | Mar 1996 | A |
6349982 | Fayngersh et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6393878 | Fayngersh et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6578888 | Fayngersh et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6619705 | Dalsing | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6926315 | Kondratuk | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7007985 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1291479 | Mar 2003 | EP |
871601 | Oct 1988 | FI |
2726026 | Apr 1996 | FR |
2203794 | Oct 1988 | GB |
3293491 | Dec 1991 | JP |
2176715 | Dec 2001 | RU |
2181423 | Apr 2002 | RU |
1448020 | Dec 1988 | SU |
Entry |
---|
Marko Keranen, Office action and search report for FI 20075296, Feb. 21, 2008, Finland. |
Roeland Henkes, International Search Report and written opinion for PCT/FI2008/050173, Sep. 29, 2008, Netherlands. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100148522 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |