1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the lock systems of the doors, specifically, designed for the external safety doors of the apartments or buildings.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The known door locking systems include the mechanism for the control of engaging the door handle and the door lock latch In the door locked state, the door handle and the lock latch are disengaged and, therefore, the door can not be unlocked with the door handle. To unlock the door, user engages the door handle and the lock latch by means of an engagement mechanism and unlocks the door by the door handle. As a rule, the engagement mechanism is actuated by the detail movement directed perpendicular to the door plane and designed to pull the members of the door handle and the lock latch together or to introduce an engagement member between the members of the door handle and the lock latch. The disadvantage of this engagement mechanism is its complexity caused with the necessity of transposing the relatively large details or assembles and returning them to their original positions. Introducing the mentioned members into engagement demands applying of substantial force and is connected with the detail wear and the possibility of member jamming. As a result, the durability and reliability of the door lock system is decreased. Besides, providing the detail drive in the direction perpendicular to the door plane is awkward as the door size in this direction is limited.
Patent EP1152106 can be considered as an example of the existing engagement mechanisms. The mechanism includes a grip collar with a lower necked section rotatably mounted in the door plate and a bush rotatably mounted on the mentioned necked section and having a locking ball assembly. There is also a poligonal actuating bar for introducing into the central bore in the necked section in the direction perpendicular to the door plane in order to displace four balls to the notches in the necked section and thereby to engage the necked section and the bush. The above noted disadvantages, such as the design complexity, decreased reliability and durability and the other fully relate to this patent because it comprises the polygonal actuating bar to be transposed in the direction perpendicular to the door plane. Furthermore, central disposition of the actuating bar in this design creates the problems for the central disposition of the rotatable door handle, as well as for the control of the door locking system by two means, for instance by a constantly used electrical drive and an alternate mechanical drive.
The objective of the present invention is the simplification of the engagement mechanism of the door lock system and the reduction of its cost.
Another objective is heightening the durability and the reliability of the door locking system.
Another objective is providing the suitability of the door locking system for the control by two, main and alternate means.
The above noted objectives are accomplished with a door locking system including a door handle, a lock latch and a controlled engagement mechanism. The latter comprises coaxially rotatable inner and intermediate members, as well as an immovable outer base member. The inner member is connected with the door handle and slidably housed inside the intermediate member with the possibility of its rotation relative to the intermediate member. The intermediate member is connected with the lock latch and slidably housed inside the outer member with the possibility of its rotation relative to the outer base member. The engagement mechanism also comprises an engagement member movably housed in a radial through opening in the intermediate member and, in the door locked state, entering a notch of the inner member by its one side and constantly contacting with a pusher by its opposite side. The dimension of the engagement member measured in the axial direction of the radial through opening of the intermediate member is substantially equal to the sum of the wall thickness of the intermediate member and the depth of the notch of the inner member. This allows the inner and intermediate members, engaged with the engagement member, the free rotation inside the outer base member. The pusher is movably located in the outer base member, constantly forced by a spring against the engagement member in the door locked state, and provided with a blocking means for fixing the pusher in its blocking position. In this position, the pusher prevents the engagement member from the displacement beyond the limits of the intermediate and inner members thereby engaging these members and allowing the rotation of the intermediate member by the door handle. This rotation leads to displacing the lock latch and unlocking the door. The blocking means includes two lateral recesses on the pusher disposed oppositely relative to each other and two blocking bars disposed strictly against the pusher lateral recesses. One of the blocking bars is driven by a solenoid and controlled by means of a digital device and the other blocking bar has mechanical drive controlled by a door key. To unlock the door, user dials a digital code on the digital device and solenoid introduces the blocking bar into the pusher lateral recess thereby fixing the pusher in its blocking position. This allows unlocking the door by rotating the door handle. The blocking bar with mechanical drive serves as an alternate means for use if the malfunctions of the electrical drive occur.
As distinct from the prior art, the proposed engagement mechanism has three, inner, intermediate and outer base members rotatable relative to each other and only one engagement member disposed in the radial through opening of the intermediate member and partially displaced into the inner or outer base members. This enables the arrangement of the pusher and the blocking bars laterally relative to the inner and intermediate members. As a result, practically all the engagement mechanism is disposed in the door plane that simplifies the installation of the door handle and facilitates the use of the dual control of the door locking system. The use of only one engagement member also substantially simplifies the design. The engagement member practically is immovable relative to the intermediate and inner members in locked, unlocked and transitional door states, reducing to a minimum the friction, wear and jamming in the engagement mechanism. Besides, there are no any transpositions of the engagement member or the inner and intermediate members directed to the engagement of the door handle and the lock latch. Instead, there is only insignificant displacement of one blocking bar in the door plane that is substantially less than the needed transpositions in the prior art. As a result, the design of the engagement mechanism is sufficiently simple, reliable, durable and suitable for applying the double control means.
Referring first to
The rotation of door handle 11 and connected with it inner member 13 without blocking pusher 19 (see
Thus, the design of engagement mechanism 10 includes three, inner, intermediate and outer base members 13, 14, 15 rotatable relative to each other, as well as only one engagement member 17 disposed between inner member 13 and outer member 15. This allows arranging pusher 19, blocking bars 24, 25 and practically engagement mechanism 10 as a whole in the door plane, thereby simplifying it and facilitating the application of the dual control of the door locking system. The use of only one engagement member 17 also substantially simplifies the engagement mechanism design. The member position, shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
154193 | Jan 2003 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL04/00095 | 2/1/2004 | WO | 7/27/2005 |