Automatic door operators are used on public buildings and residences to allow for access by the physically disabled or where manual operation of the door may be inconvenient to users. The purpose of a door operator is to open and possibly close a door. A variety of electro-mechanical automatic door operators are known. A typical door operator includes an electric motor and a linkage assembly for operatively coupling the drive shaft of the motor to a door so that the door will be opened and closed when the drive shaft rotates. Activation of the door operator is initiated by means of an electric signal generated in a variety of ways such as, for example, a pressure switch, an ultrasonic or photoelectric presence sensor, motion sensors, radio transmitters, wall switches, and the like. The door may then be closed by the operator motor or with a door closer. Many door closers are mechanically actuated and have a plurality of valves and springs for controlling the varying amounts of force applied to close the door as a function of door angle.
Some door operator systems are provided with clutch mechanisms between the motor and the linkage assembly that enable the door to be moved freely under manual power. Door operators with clutch mechanisms may provide some level of safety when objects are in the door's pathway of movement. Various clutch mechanisms decouple powered opening systems during the closing cycle, which is particularly necessary in the event of an interruption of power supply or when an obstacle is encountered.
When a door operator with a clutch mechanism is used with a mechanical door closer, the features of both a door operator and a full-featured door closer can be available to users of the door. As an example, the automatic opening available with a door operator is available, but in addition, varying amounts of force can be applied to the door by the door closer. Many door closers are designed to apply varying forces to a door as a function of the door angle (i.e., the angle at which the door is open). In this regard, when the door is first opened under manual operation, the door closer is designed to generate a relatively small force, which tends to push the door closed, so that the door closer does not generate significant resistance to the user's efforts to open the door. Many door closers are designed to provide a significant resistive force when the door is pushed open beyond a specific angle, for example, 60 to 70 degrees. This high-force region of operation of the door is often referred to as the “back check” region, and the high force is intended to prevent the back of the door from hitting a wall or stop, possibly causing damage.
Embodiments of the present invention are realized by a motorized door operator that electrically creates a back check for an opening door. The door operator according to embodiments of the present invention simulates the back check normally created by hydraulic means in a conventional door closer, but without the use of pistons, springs or hydraulic fluid. The back check force in embodiments of the invention is created by electrical control of the motor.
A door operator according to example embodiments of the invention includes a motor disposed to operatively connect to a door so that the door will open when the motor moves, and a position sensor to determine a position of the door. A memory and a processor are also included, wherein the processor is operatively connected to the motor, the position sensor and the memory. The processor is programmed, for example, by information stored in the memory, to carry out a method of operating the door operator including determining that the door to which the door operator is attached is opening through a back check region, and electronically controlling the electric motor to exert a closing force on the door. In some embodiments, the closing force is maintained until the door comes to a stop. This “back check” force is created by electrical signals sent to the motor.
In some embodiments, the processor can also determine if a door is being pushed open and prevent the electric motor from opening the door, either before, or concurrently with exerting the closing force on the door in the back check region. In some embodiments, the closing force is exerted by injecting a voltage into the electric motor of the door operator. In some embodiments, this voltage is of the same polarity as the voltage used to close the door where the door operator is also operative to close the door. In some embodiments, the level of the voltage is controlled by a potentiometer operatively connected to the controller. Such a potentiometer, as well as other components such as switches, can provide the means to adjust various operating parameters of the door operator.
In some embodiments, the processor determines the position of a door by sensing the proximity of a magnet. In some embodiments, this position sensing is accomplished by a position sensor such as a Hall effect device or Hall effect sensor. In some embodiments, the door operator includes a wall switch by which a user can selectively operate the door operator. The position sensor and switch are connected to a control unit which includes the processor. The control unit together with any sensors, input devices and the like form a control system for the door operator and provide the means to control the motor, and the door operator in general.
In some embodiments, the drive shaft of the motor is operatively connected to an output shaft. A clutch assembly can be mounted to the output shaft and conditionally, operatively engage a rotatable operator arm that can be operatively connected to the door. The clutch assembly in part enables the motor to be disengaged if a user manually opens the door, and if the user manually closes the door in an embodiment where the door operator motor is enabled to both open and close the door. The motor and any components necessary to operatively couple the motor to the door can form the means of opening the door.
The following detailed description of embodiments refers to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate specific embodiments of the invention. Other embodiments having different structures and operation do not depart from the scope of the present invention.
Certain terminology is used herein for convenience only and is not to be taken as a limitation on the embodiments described. For example, words such as “top”, “bottom”, “upper,” “lower,” “left,” “right,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “upward,” and “downward” merely describe the configuration shown in the figures. Indeed, the referenced components may be oriented in any direction and the terminology, therefore, should be understood as encompassing such variations unless specified otherwise.
As used herein, the term “open position” for a door means a door position other than a fully closed position, including any position between the fully closed position and a fully open position as limited only by structure around the door frame, which can be up to 180° from the closed position.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding or similar elements throughout the several views, an embodiment of a door operator is shown in
Continuing with
The back plate 30 in
Still referring to
Referring now to
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the electric motor may be selected and sized according to the dimensions and weight of the hinged door 22, and may include a gear train 54 disposed within a casing and include a gear train input shaft (not shown) coupled to the drive shaft of the motor. An intermediate shaft that is the output of the gear train 54 is coupled to the gear train input shaft. The gear train 54 may provide a proper reduction in output drive of the motor necessary to move the hinged door 22 at an appropriate speed. The control unit 34 regulates the operation of the motor and thus regulates the opening and closing of the door 22. The control unit 34 is in communication with the motor, which is adapted to receive signals from the control unit 34. The control unit 34 will be further described below with reference to
The control unit 34 is part of an overall control system which may include an input device in electrical communication with the control unit 34 for allowing a user to selectively control the delivery of electrical energy to the motor. The input device is operable to generate a door movement signal to the control unit 34 which, in turn, is responsive to receiving the door movement signal to control operation of the motor so as to selectively cause the motor to rotate the drive shaft and thereby affect powered opening of the door 22. The input device may be of any known or desired type. For example, the input device may consist of a manual push pad wall switch for being mounted on the wall, or a post, adjacent to the door 22. This arrangement is such that a user, such as, for example, a handicapped person wanting to pass through the door opening need only to press the push pad for sending a signal to the control unit 34 to open the door 22. Various other input devices are also suitable for use, including any type of switch, sensors and actuators, such as pressure pads as in a switch type floor mat and other mechanical switching devices, infrared motion sensors, radio frequency sensors, photoelectric cells, ultrasonic presence sensor switches, and the like. As a result of implementing some of these input devices, an automatically operable door may be caused to open by mere proximity of a person to the door. Such proximity may cause the door to operate by virtue of the interruption of a light beam, distortion of an electrical field, or by actual physical closing of the switch by contact with the person or in response to the weight of the person approaching the door. Consequently, the particular manner for generating a door movement signal to the control unit 34 for energizing the motor can be accomplished through any of various means.
It should be noted that when the term “input device” is used herein, the term is generally intended to refer to the device used to operate the door by a user on a day-to-day basis. The control unit of embodiments of the invention may receive other “input” from switches, potentiometers, and the like, where this input is designed to enable an installer, maintenance person, or the like to adjust the door operator. This input may include the setting of such parameters as hold-open torque, hold-open time, delay, etc.
Still referring to
In the embodiment shown, the bottom brace 96 also holds a door position sensor 120. As best seen in
When the control unit senses the “open” magnet approaching, the control unit creates a back check condition by quickly ramping the speed of the door down using voltage injection to the motor. For example, in some embodiments the control unit ramps the speed of the door down within about 50 milliseconds. The control unit then switches to the “hold-open” condition for the door operator. If the “hold-open torque” were adjusted to be very low, the door would feel like it is coasting beyond the open magnet. If the “hold-open torque” were adjusted to be very high it would be very hard to move the door at this point.
The operator arm assembly 204 includes an operator arm 208, a track 82, a roller 86, a magnet holder 210, a washer 212, and a nut 214. The operator arm 208 has an arm hub 216 defining an opening through which the motor shaft and magnet holder 210 extend, and is similar to the operator arm 82 of
A door position sensor 240 is mounted to the back plate 30 with a bracket 242. The sensor 240 design and operation is similar to the sensor 120 of the door operator 20 of
In the example embodiments described herein, the control system includes components 580 to provide setup parameters to the controller. These components include potentiometers and dip switches. In one example, potentiometers are provided for hold-open torque, hold open time, closing force, obstruction sensitivity, motor delay, and the force by which the door is held closed against a doorframe. A dipswitch is provided to set the door operator for either left hand or right hand operation. Another dipswitch is provided in this example to activate or deactivate push-to-open mode. The hold-open torque is the amount of force by which the door resists movement in the open position. The hold-open time is the amount of time the door will stay open, and the obstruction sensitivity determines how hard the door will push on an obstruction when opening before stopping. In some embodiments, these input components are monitored continuously to determine the operating parameters of the door operator. However, it is possible to design an embodiment where these settings are stored in memory 554. In such an embodiment, the input components are read at start-up. It is also possible to design an embodiment where these parameters are put in memory 554 through programming interface 504 rather than input via connected components such as potentiometers or switches.
The power module of
Controller 502 in this example embodiment includes a central processing unit (CPU) 552 and memory 554. Many different types of processing devices could be used to implement an embodiment of the invention, including a processor, digital signal processor, or so-called, “embedded controller.” Any of these devices could include memory along with a processing core such as a CPU, or could use external memory or a combination of internal and external memory. In the illustrated embodiment the memory stores firmware or computer program code for executing a process or method on the CPU or other processor to carry out an embodiment of the invention. Such firmware or computer program code can be loaded into the control unit from an external computer system via programming interface 504. The process or method of an embodiment of the invention could also be carried out by logic circuitry, a custom semiconductor device, or a combination of such a device or circuitry with firmware or software. As previously mentioned, in some embodiments the memory could also be used to store operating parameters.
An embodiment of the invention take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, or an embodiment that uses software (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.). Furthermore, an embodiment of the invention may take the form of a computer program product on a tangible computer-usable storage medium having computer-usable program code embodied in the medium. A memory device or memory portion of a processor as shown in
Still referring to
If the current drawn by the motor is greater than the normal operating current at block 612 of
Process 620 of
The voltage injection in the embodiment pictured is accomplished by applying a continuous DC voltage to the motor. The level of this voltage is adjusted using the hold-open torque potentiometer. The voltage level is fixed relative to the position of the door in the pictured embodiment; however, an embodiment could be developed in which the voltage changed depending on the exact position of the door if a position sensor were included. A design could also be developed in which a pulsed voltage is used to create the electrical back check.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. Additionally, comparative, quantitative terms such as “less” OR “greater” are intended to encompass the concept of equality, thus, “less” can mean not only “less” in the strictest mathematical sense, but also, “less than or equal to.”
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, those of ordinary skill in the art appreciate that any arrangement which is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and that the invention has other applications in other environments. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the present invention. The following claims are in no way intended to limit the scope of the invention to the specific embodiments described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
581972 | Wright | May 1897 | A |
618053 | Brown | Jan 1899 | A |
2138521 | Ellis | Nov 1938 | A |
2639142 | Morgan et al. | May 1953 | A |
2758835 | Wikkerink | Aug 1956 | A |
2843376 | Osuch et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
2924449 | Leimer et al. | Feb 1960 | A |
3059485 | Bohlman et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3114541 | Coffey | Dec 1963 | A |
3195879 | Bond et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
3268944 | Sanchez | Aug 1966 | A |
3284950 | Gute | Nov 1966 | A |
3449789 | Russell et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3470653 | Kalog | Oct 1969 | A |
3560950 | Peters | Feb 1971 | A |
3609390 | Feldman | Sep 1971 | A |
3719005 | Carli | Mar 1973 | A |
3777423 | Coulter et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3874117 | Boehm | Apr 1975 | A |
3886425 | Weiss | May 1975 | A |
3955661 | Popper et al. | May 1976 | A |
4045914 | Catlett | Sep 1977 | A |
4161183 | Berry | Jul 1979 | A |
4220051 | Catlett | Sep 1980 | A |
4222147 | Burnett, Jr. | Sep 1980 | A |
4267619 | Suska | May 1981 | A |
4285094 | Levings, Jr. | Aug 1981 | A |
4289995 | Sorber et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4330958 | Richmond | May 1982 | A |
4333270 | Catlett | Jun 1982 | A |
4334161 | Carli | Jun 1982 | A |
4342354 | Leivenzon et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348835 | Jones et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4429490 | Zunkel | Feb 1984 | A |
4472910 | Iha | Sep 1984 | A |
4498033 | Aihara et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4501090 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4553656 | Lense | Nov 1985 | A |
4563625 | Kornbrekke et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4573238 | Phillips | Mar 1986 | A |
4644693 | Wang | Feb 1987 | A |
4658545 | Ingham et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4660324 | Nyenbrink | Apr 1987 | A |
4669218 | Kornbrekke et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4727679 | Kornbrekke et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4836345 | Anderson | Jun 1989 | A |
4852706 | Pietrzak et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4945678 | Berner et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4952080 | Boiucaner et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4966266 | Yamada et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4972629 | Merendino et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4995194 | Schultze et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4999551 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5018304 | Longoria | May 1991 | A |
5024124 | Popov et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5040331 | Merendino et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5095654 | Eccleston | Mar 1992 | A |
5218282 | Duhame | Jun 1993 | A |
5221239 | Catlett | Jun 1993 | A |
5222327 | Fellows et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5278480 | Murray | Jan 1994 | A |
5375374 | Rohroff, Sr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5502874 | Lucas | Apr 1996 | A |
5507120 | Current | Apr 1996 | A |
5513467 | Current et al. | May 1996 | A |
5634296 | Hebda | Jun 1997 | A |
5634298 | Slopack | Jun 1997 | A |
5687507 | Beran | Nov 1997 | A |
5698073 | Vincenzi | Dec 1997 | A |
5752344 | Richmond | May 1998 | A |
5770934 | Theile | Jun 1998 | A |
5808654 | Loos | Sep 1998 | A |
5828302 | Tsutsumi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5878530 | Eccleston et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881497 | Borgardt | Mar 1999 | A |
5910075 | Arnell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913763 | Beran et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930954 | Hebda | Aug 1999 | A |
5956249 | Beran et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963000 | Tsutsumi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987818 | Dabideen | Nov 1999 | A |
6002217 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006475 | Schwantes et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6067753 | Hebda | May 2000 | A |
6108975 | Bailey | Aug 2000 | A |
6185773 | Goedde | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6223469 | Moll | May 2001 | B1 |
6316892 | Valencia | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318196 | Chang | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343437 | Hoffmann et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347485 | Hebda | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357805 | Hebda | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6430871 | Hebda | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6481160 | Kowalczyk | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493904 | Chiang | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6553717 | St. John et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6588153 | Kowalczyk | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6634140 | Sellman | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640494 | Hormann | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6678999 | Zeungguang et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6751909 | Ranaudo | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6883275 | Hellinga et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891479 | Eccleston | May 2005 | B1 |
7068179 | Snell et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7170248 | Tsui et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7234201 | Brown et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7296380 | Backman | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316096 | Houser et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324894 | Urman et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7418800 | Sellman | Sep 2008 | B1 |
20020092237 | Hebda | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030057905 | Fitzgibbon | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030204935 | Kim | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040035057 | Backman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040251868 | Sato et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050073425 | Snell et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091928 | Okulov et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060021189 | Johnson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060090400 | Los et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060191204 | Herwig et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197481 | Hotto et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242908 | McKinney | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060244271 | Hass | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080115543 | Lanigan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090265992 | Hass et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300988 | Bem | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100115853 | Gebhart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
690370 | Aug 2000 | CH |
20218327 | May 2004 | DE |
1296399 | Nov 1989 | JP |
4131488 | May 1992 | JP |
6033994 | Feb 1994 | JP |
11324483 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2009270278 | Nov 2009 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Yale Security, Inc., International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/023398, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Aug. 20, 2007. |
Yale Security, Inc., International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/023398, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Sep. 20, 2007. |
Sky Link, Add Remote Control to any Swinging Door, www.smarthome.com/73105/Swing-Door-Opener-w-Electric-Strike-Automatic-Door-Security/p.aspx, 3 pages, visited May 13, 2010. |
JPM Security Systems, Wheelchair Accessible Door/Window Access Systems for Disabled or Elderly People, www.jpmsecurity.ie/index.php?page=disabled-door-access, 2 pages, visited May 13, 2010. |
Nabco,Ltd., Nabco Entrances Swing Doors, www.floridadoorcontrol.com/nabco—swing—doors.htm, 3 pages, visited on Oct. 7, 2009. |
The Stanley Works, Swing Door Systems, www.stanleyaccesstechnologies.com/products/lit/Swing%20Door%20Series%20AT9706.pdf, 4 pages, visited on or about Oct. 7, 2009. |
Product Review, Home & Garden, Garage Door Operators, Boss BS1, www.productreview.com.au, 1 page, visited on or about Jun. 17, 2009. |
Christy Commercial Hardware, Jackson Closers, www.christyhardware.com, 1 page, visited on or about Jun. 17, 2009. |
Houser, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,871, filed Oct. 22, 2009. |
Yale Security Inc., International Application No. PCT/US2011/045721, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Nov. 7, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120029701 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |