The present invention relates to strike mechanisms for electrically locking a door in a frame; more particularly, to such strike mechanisms wherein a door latch and dead latch are electrically retained or released by the strike; and most particularly, to an electrically-controlled strike having a pivotable keeper, pivotable kicker, and adjustably positionable pivotable dead latch release platform that all pivot together in synchronized motion to release a door latch from the strike.
As is known in the art of door latching, typically an electrically-controlled strike is mounted in a frame portion of a door and engages a mortise-type lockset disposed on or in an edge portion of the door. Typically, the mortise-type lockset includes a spring latch and a dead latch that is linearly spaced-apart from the spring latch along the edge portion of the door. The spring latch is reciprocally moveable between an engaged position so that it can engage the strike, thereby to retain the door in a fastened state, and a release position, wherein the door is released from the fastened state and is free to open. The dead latch is reciprocally moveable between an enabled position (extended) that permits movement of the spring latch from the engaged position to the release position and a disabled position (depressed) that prohibits movement of the spring latch from the engaged position to the release position. The spring latch is resiliently biased into an engaged position and the dead latch is resiliently biased into the enabled position.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,581,991 B2, the relevant disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses an electrically-controlled strike comprising a housing adapted to be mounted in a frame portion of a door and having a cavity with a forwardly disposed opening that is sized and adapted to receive a spring latch and a dead latch when the door is in the fastened state; a spring latch mounted for linear reciprocal movement in a longitudinal throw direction in the housing between an extended position and a retracted position; a dead latch mounted for linear reciprocal movement in the longitudinal throw direction in the housing between an advanced position and a withdrawn position; a head portion supported on the spring latch plunger and being selectively positionable at a selected head location in the opening of the cavity, the head portion being operative to engage spring latch bolt when the door is in the fastened state thereby to accommodate different locations of the spring latch on the edge portion of the door; a striker assembly supported on the dead latch plunger and including an ensemble of strike elements operative to define a strike surface for the dead latch and providing a portal for the spring latch at a selected portal location, the strike elements being selectively arrangeable into different configurations thereby to vary the selected portal location to accommodate different spring latch and dead latch arrangements (as found over a variety of mortise locksets); and a drive operative to reciprocally drive the dead latch from the advanced position to the withdrawn position and to advance the spring latch from the retracted position to the extended position. The invention provides a single electrically actuated door latch structure that can be customized to a variety of spring latch and dead latch arrangements.
The disclosed mechanism is complex, comprising a large number of components including an electric motor gear train, and worm gear drive; a multiple-component attack head subassembly for enabling and disabling the door spring latch; and a multiple-component strike element subassembly for enabling and disabling the dead latch. The attack head subassembly and the strike element subassembly are driven reciprocally in coordination by the electric motor gear train during operation of the mechanism.
What is needed in the art is a simplified electrically-controlled strike that can be customized to a variety of spring latch and dead latch arrangements and that has relatively few components operated simply by an electric solenoid.
What is further needed is a kicker disposed in the strike and cooperative with the keeper and spring latch to facilitate movement of the spring latch toward its released position.
It is a principal object of the present invention to reduce the cost and complexity of an electrically-controlled strike for a mortise door lockset and to improve spring latch release operation.
Briefly described, an electrically-controlled strike in accordance with the present invention comprises a rectangular housing disposable within the frame of a door pivotably mounted in the frame. The housing includes an elongate opening defining an entry chamber for a spring latch and a dead latch of a lockset in the door. An entrance ramp for the spring latch and dead latch extends from an edge of the housing. A keeper is pivotably mounted within the chamber to engage and retain the spring latch. A kicker is also pivotably mounted within the chamber and is interlocked with the keeper and engageable by the spring latch. A dead latch release platform is also pivotably mounted within the chamber and is supported at an opposite end by the keeper when the door latch is secured within the strike. When a release command is received, the keeper is released by means of a solenoid and rotates into a position from which the spring latch may be ramped out of the strike opening. The keeper rotation allows the dead latch release platform to pivot into the cavity, releasing the dead latch to be extended into the cavity which allows the spring latch to be ramped into the door. The pivot action of the keeper causes the kicker to engage the nose of the spring latch and urge the spring latch onto an exit ramp formed on a face of the keeper. The spring latch climbs the ramps and exits the strike over the entrance ramp as the door opens in the frame. The dead latch release platform can be installed in any of a plurality of different vertical locations in the housing opening to accommodate any of a plurality of different lockset arrangements.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrates currently preferred embodiments of the invention, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
The present invention is broadly directed to an automated door latch release system that is adapted to be installed in a door jam or frame so that it can operate with a mortise-type lock with dead latch assembly such as those found in typical commercial and industrial applications. The present invention also encompasses a method for automated door release. The present invention is particularly adapted for use with security doors in industrial and commercial applications wherein the security system can be electronically activated to release the door so that it may be moved from a secured first door position wherein it is secured within the door jam to an open position. The automated door lock release, also referred to herein as an “electrically-controlled strike,” is primarily adapted for use with a mortise-type dead latch assembly mounted in the door. Here, the mortise-type dead latch assembly includes a spring latch and a dead latch that are spaced-apart from one another along the edge of the door. Moreover, the present invention is specifically adapted to be mounted in the dimensions of a typical door jam, requiring no further modifications, other than the location of the dead latch platform, to interface with a variety of different styles of mortise-type dead locks.
An automated door lock release or strike in accordance with the present invention is an improvement over the prior art automated door latch release disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,581,991 B2 and is intended to function as a direct replacement thereof.
Referring to
A typical door 24 is shown in
Door latch actuator 10 is constructed to interface with a mortise-type lockset assembly 30 according to the prior art, exemplarily shown in
Dead latch 34 similarly is reciprocally moveable between an extended or “enabling position” and a depressed or “disabling position”. As is known in the prior art, when the dead latch is held in its disabling position, it prevents (“disables”) movement of the spring latch bolt from moving from the engaged position to the release position. However, when the dead latch extends into the enabling position, the spring latch bolt may reciprocate between the engaged position and the release position. In
With reference now to
Referring now to
A dead latch release subassembly 152 (best shown in
A first embodiment of the dead latch release subassembly 152 (
A keeper 166 is pivotably mounted longitudinally of housing 116 and in the locked position (
A kicker 170 is also pivotably mounted longitudinally of housing 116 and rests against a leg 172 of keeper 166. A return spring 173 is mounted on kicker 170 and constrained by body 116. Return spring 173 may be but is not limited to, a leaf, compression or torsion spring. As described in detail below, a solenoid is linearly operative against keeper 166 to selectively permit rotation of the keeper as described below when an unlocked mode for mechanism 110 is desired.
Referring to
In
In
Referring to
Referring to
It should be noted that, by re-aligning inhibitor 182 relative to mating teeth 186 on keeper 166 as shown in
While the invention has been described by reference to various specific embodiments, it should be understood that numerous changes may be made within the spirit and scope of the inventive concepts described. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but will have full scope defined by the language of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/179,011, filed Feb. 12, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,476,227, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/851,848, filed Aug. 6, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,783,744, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/232,497, filed Aug. 10, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1059530 | Dupuis | Apr 1913 | A |
1555830 | Carroll | Oct 1925 | A |
3638984 | Davidson | Feb 1972 | A |
3774422 | Hogan et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
4211443 | Butts et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4626000 | O'Leary | Dec 1986 | A |
4626010 | Hanchett, Jr. et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4867496 | Thomas | Sep 1989 | A |
5118150 | Jarrett | Jun 1992 | A |
5118151 | Nicholas, Jr. | Jun 1992 | A |
5195792 | Stendal | Mar 1993 | A |
5257841 | Geringer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5474342 | Smith et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484180 | Helmar | Jan 1996 | A |
5595409 | Fier et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5735559 | Frolov | Apr 1998 | A |
5757269 | Roth et al. | May 1998 | A |
5934720 | Karalius | Aug 1999 | A |
5990579 | Ricci | Nov 1999 | A |
6022056 | Cope et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6082791 | Frolov et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6581991 | Galindo | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6588155 | Theune et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6634685 | Herron et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6874830 | Bashford | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6913299 | Stendal | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6935663 | Schildwachter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6966585 | Egi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7010947 | Milo | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7144053 | Bashford | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7185928 | Liao | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7273241 | Milo | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7722097 | Schnarr et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8132833 | Schnekenburger | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8146966 | Webb et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8157302 | Webb et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8783744 | Scheffler et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9121198 | Gresser | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9476227 | Scheffler et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
20030127869 | Herron et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040061343 | Bashford | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050184539 | Milo | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060192397 | Schnarr et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060226663 | Liao | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070085354 | Hirschoff | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070132250 | Schnekenburger | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080191499 | Stein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224481 | Geringer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090072555 | Holzer | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090188289 | Orbeta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100038920 | Tsai | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078944 | Hirschoff | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100096864 | Webb et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100116006 | Huang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127518 | Huang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100289279 | Toma | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110031768 | Scheffler et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130088023 | Singh | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10116299 | Oct 2002 | DE |
20 2004 007910 | Jul 2004 | DE |
10310403 | Sep 2004 | DE |
102004012112 | Aug 2005 | DE |
10 2005 015248 | Oct 2006 | DE |
102005048693 | Apr 2007 | DE |
102007014324.0 | Oct 2008 | DE |
0851077 | Nov 2001 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Ahmad, Faria, “Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,517, filed Aug. 26, 2013, dated May 6, 2016, Alexandria, VA. |
Ahmad, Faria, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,517, filed Aug. 26, 2013, dated Jan. 12, 2017, Alexandria, VA. |
Ahmad, Faria, “Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,517, filed Aug. 26, 2013, dated Jul. 27, 2017, Alexandria, VA. |
Baxter, M.A.Sc., Iain, “Office Action,” issued for C.A. App. No. 2,712,769 filed on Aug. 10, 2010, dated Feb. 29, 2016, Gatineau, QC. |
Baxter, M.A.Sc., Iain; “Office Action,” issued for C.A. App. No. 2,712,769 filed on Aug. 10, 2010, dated Mar. 1, 2017, Gatineau, QC. |
Van Beurden, Jason, “PCT International Search Report,” dated Jul. 17, 2014 for application No. PCT/US2011/065198, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, NL 2280. |
Van Beurden, Jason, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” dated Jul. 17, 2014 for application No. PCT/US2011/065198, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, NL 2280. |
Hanchett Entry Sytems, Inc. “Price List for 900 Series Electric Strike,” 2 pages, Jan. 1986. |
Locksmith Ledger Magazine, pp. 113-114, Feb. 1986. |
The National Locksmith Magazine, cover, Apr. 1986. |
Locksmith Ledger Magazine, p. 52, Dec. 1986. |
Hanchett Entry Systems, Inc., “Installation Instructions for the 900 Series Strike,” 4 pages, Feb. 1986. |
Merlino, Alyson Marie, “Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/851,848, filed Aug. 6, 2010, dated Mar. 20, 2014, Alexandria, VA. |
Merlino, Alyson Marie, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/851,848, filed Aug. 6, 2010, dated May 31, 2013, Alexandria, VA. |
Merlino, Alyson Marie, “Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/851,848, filed Aug. 6, 2010, dated Mar. 13, 2013, Alexandria, VA. |
Merlino, Alyson Marie, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 12/851,848, filed Aug. 6, 2010, dated Aug. 15, 2012, Alexandria VA. |
Ahmad, Faria F., “Non-Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 13/919,517, filed Aug. 26, 2013, dated Oct. 6, 2015, Alexandria, VA. |
Merlino, Alyson Marie, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,011, filed Feb. 12, 2014, dated Jan. 14, 2016, Alexandria, VA. |
Merlino, Alyson Marie, “Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,011, filed Feb. 12, 2014, dated Jul. 25, 2016, Alexandria, VA. |
Merlino, Alyson Marie, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,011, filed Feb. 12, 2014, dated Jul. 10, 2015, Alexandria, VA. |
Munns, Ben, “Patents Act 1977: Search Report Under Section 17,” for Application No. GB1013446.8, Intellectual Property Office of Great Britain. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170037657 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61232497 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14179011 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 15332578 | US | |
Parent | 12851848 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 14179011 | US |