The present invention relates to door/window magnetic sensor for sensing the opening and closing of a door or window
Prior art door/window magnetic sensing devices use a reed switch so only the open or closed state of the reed switch is known. A magnet must be positioned close to the switching point of a reed switch, which has a limited distance range for switching. The field applied by the magnet to the reed switch may also vary a small amount in a particular installation due to normal amount of play in the door latching mechanism and seal (weather strip). This limited change in position of the magnet relative to the reed switch may lead to a false alarm when a door moves even slightly, for instance, due to a wind storm or due to a barometric pressure change.
Another issue with the traditional reed switch and magnet door sensors is that a would-be thief can simply place a second magnet on the reed switch housing. The second magnet keeps the reed switch in its normal state even when the door is opened. The thief returns later to open the door and goes undetected.
Finally, in many instances mounting a magnet near a traditional reed switch can be difficult as there is uncertainty whether the magnet and reed switch are within an appropriate distance during installation.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a door/window magnetic sensing device comprising: a magnetic sensor configured to sense signal strength of a magnet and output a signal strength value, and a controller for receiving the signal strength value from the magnetic sensor. The controller is configured to determine an alarm state, a normal state, and a tamper state from the signal strength value.
In another embodiment, the magnetic sensor is a Hall effect sensor that provides an output voltage when no magnetic field is sensed thereby.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a door/window magnetic sensing device comprising: a housing, a magnetic sensor disposed in the housing and configured to sense signal strength of a magnet and output a signal strength value, and a controller for receiving the signal strength value from the magnetic sensor. The controller is configured to compare the signal strength value to an alarm threshold value and output one of a normal state signal and an alarm state signal.
In one embodiment the controller is configured to store the signal strength value provided by the magnetic sensor when a magnet is present corresponding to a closed door or closed window for at least a preselected number of occurrences. The controller processes the stored signal strength values to determine an average operational signal strength value.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a method for installing a door/window magnetic sensing device and a magnet assembly for a door sensing arrangement including mounting one of the magnet assembly and the door/window magnetic sensing device to a door or a door frame and mounting the other of the magnet assembly and the door/window magnetic sensing device to the other of the door or the door frame. The mounting includes providing an indication that the magnet assembly and the door/window magnetic sensing device are too far apart to perform door sensing and providing an indication that the magnet is being detected by a magnetic sensor of the door/window magnetic sensing device as one of the magnet assembly and the door/window magnetic sensing device approaches the other of the magnet assembly and the door/window magnetic sensing device. The method includes providing an indication that the door/window magnetic sensing device is approaching or moving away from the magnet assembly corresponding to an increase or decrease in a signal strength of the magnet sensed by the magnetic sensor; and indicating that the magnet and the magnetic sensor are moved to a position that corresponds to the door/window magnetic sensing device and the magnet assembly being in a closed or shut position and the signal strength of the magnet sensed by the magnetic sensor exceeds a signal strength margin. Then the approaching one of the magnet assembly and the door/window magnetic sensing device is secured to the other of the door and the door frame at the position wherein the magnetic sensor detects the signal strength of the magnet that exceeds the signal strength margin.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
In
The Hall effect sensor 82 shown in
Method of Installing the Door Arrangement
The LED indicator 80 is used to help a security system installer mount the magnet assembly 30 and door/window magnetic sensing device 40 in positions that have a sufficient signal strength margin to prevent false alarms. The indicator 80 illuminates continuously when the magnet 34 within the magnet assembly 30 is too far away from the door/window magnetic sensing device 40. As the magnet 34 approaches the door/window magnetic sensing device 40, the LED indicator 80 starts to flash slowly indicating that the presence of the magnet is detected but does not have the proper signal strength margin. As the magnet 34 is moved closer to the door/window magnetic sensing device 40, the LED indicator flash rate increases. In response to the detection of a proper signal strength margin, the LED indicator 80 stops flashing and is off, which notifies the installer that this is a proper location to mount the magnet assembly 30 or the door/window magnetic sensing device 40. In another embodiment, the LED indicator 80 starts to flash quickly, and as the magnet 34 approaches the door/window magnetic sensing device 40, the rate of flashing reduces and eventually the LED indicator stops when mounting is proper. Signal strength margin provides a margin beyond the signal strength whereat the magnetic sensing device 40 merely detects the presence of the magnet 34. Thus, when the signal strength of the magnet 34 measured by the door/window magnetic sensing device 40 exceeds the signal strength margin, the magnet assembly 30 and the door/window magnetic sensing device 40 can be affixed to the door or door frame, respectively. The signal strength margin prevents minor movements and changes in the orientation of the magnet 34, for example, from compromising the operation of the door sensing arrangement 10.
There are two different voltage arrangements for the installation and subsequent operation of the magnet assembly 30 and the door/window magnetic sensing device 40 as shown in
When the Hall effect sensor 82 senses an increase or decrease in voltage upon the approach of a magnet 34, the controller 70 immediately identifies whether a north pole of a magnet is approaching (Installation A in
When the Hall effect sensor 82 is not near a magnet 34, the voltage output thereby is about 1.0 volt. Installation A is shown to the left of the voltage (VOUT) line extending upwardly. Installation A represents the instance wherein the north pole of the magnet 34 of the magnet assembly 30 is oriented toward the Hall effect sensor 82. The orientation results in the voltage output by the Hall effect sensor 82 increasing with the magnetic field, which is also known as the magnetic flux density BMIN measurable in millitesla (mT) as the magnet 34 approaches the Hall effect sensor 82. Thus, the controller 70 controls the LED indicator 80 to illuminate steady when no magnet 34 is sensed by the Hall effect sensor 82 or is barely sensed as the magnet and Hall effect sensor are too far apart, until the voltage sensed thereby increases due to the nearing of the presence of the magnet 34 so that the controller causes the LED indicator 80 to start blinking. As shown toward the left in
Averaging Hall Effect Sensor Output Voltage (Door Closed)
As set forth above, during setup or installation, the controller 70 determines whether a north pole or a south pole of the magnet 34 is approaching the Hall effect sensor 82 and operates as set forth above. Thus, the controller 70 is configured to determine the orientation of a magnetic field sensed by the Hall effect sensor 82 from the signal strength value corresponding to the output voltage to select an alarm threshold value based on the orientation of the magnetic field.
The controller 70 also establishes and maintains a rolling average value of the signal strength from the output voltage of the Hall effect sensor 82 when the door is in the closed state.
Installations invariably result in the magnet 34 being closer or farther from the Hall effect sensor 82 than an optimal gap distance or spacing. Further, the orientation of the magnet 34 relative to the Hall effect sensor 82 changes the output voltage therefrom. Further each Hall effect sensor 82 has its own tolerance and sensitivity range. Thus, the output voltage from different Hall effect sensors 82 of different door/window magnetic sensing devices 40 varies significantly in the closed position. Further, the Hall effect sensor output voltage is dependent on several factors and cannot be entirely predicted. Therefore, the averaging of a number of output voltage values permits the determination of an average output voltage for assistance in establishing thresholds as discussed below. While the average output voltage is based on ten closings of the door in
When the alarm threshold value is exceeded, the controller 70 via the wireless transmitter circuit 86 provides an alarm state wireless signal indicating an alarm state. Of course, when the threshold is not exceeded and tampering is not occurring as discussed below, the controller is configured to control the wireless transmitter circuit 86 to provide a normal state wireless signal.
Second Magnet Tamper Alarm
The controller 70 is also configured to identify when a second magnet is placed near the door/window magnetic sensing device 40 in order to enable opening of a door without the sensing of a voltage beyond the alarm threshold value by the Hall effect sensor 82. Once the door closed “normal” average output voltage is established, an upper tamper state threshold Uth and a lower tamper state threshold Lth are provided just above and below the average output voltage of the Hall effect sensor 82 when the door is closed. As shown in
As shown in
If a second magnet with the opposite polarity is applied or placed near to the Hall effect sensor 82 and the output voltage from the Hall effect sensor 82 exceeds the upper tamper state threshold Uth for a predetermined time, in some instances, a tamper state wireless signal is output by the controller 70 via the wireless transmitter circuit 86 indicating a sabotage attempt. More specifically, so long as the sensor output voltage is greater than the upper tamper state threshold Uth and lower than the alarm threshold for a predetermined time, the controller 70 outputs a tamper state wireless signal. In the instance that the magnetic field of a second tampering magnet is greater than the alarm threshold Alarm Th, but less than the additional tamper threshold, Tamper Th, instead an alarm state wireless signal output by the controller 70 is transmitted by the wireless transmitter circuit 86. In such an instance, if a user cannot ascertain why an alarm state exists, a tamper state or condition will immediately be suspected. When the sensor output voltage exceeds the threshold Tamper Th for a predetermined time, the controller 70 provides a tamper state wireless signal. In one embodiment, three different tamper state wireless signals are provided for the specific tamper state.
The time delay reduces false tamper state wireless signals being output that are caused by a door not fully closing momentarily or when a door is slammed shut. In some embodiments, the upper tamper state threshold UTH or the lower tamper state threshold LTH must be crossed continuously for a preselected time period, such as from about 10 seconds to about 20 seconds, before a tamper state wireless signal is sent by the controller 70 via the wireless transmitter circuit 86.
An installation A embodiment is executed in a similar manner by the controller 70. In one embodiment, the average output voltage from the Hall effect sensor 82 that corresponds to average operational signal strength of a magnetic field in the door closed position is about 1.6 volts. The upper tamper state threshold UTH is greater than 1.6 volts and the lower tamper state threshold LTH is less than 1.6 volts. The alarm threshold value is less than the tamper state thresholds in this embodiment. Thus, the controller 70 is configured to control the wireless transmitter circuit 86 to output an alarm state wireless signal when the signal strength value is below an alarm threshold for installation A. Thus, as set forth above, the controller 70 chooses between either an above alarm threshold value (Installation B) or a below alarm threshold value (Installation A) depending on the orientation of a magnet 34 that is sensed by the Hall effect sensor 82.
Other Features
After the initial installation, the door frame 12 may settle or the door assembly may wear causing a misalignment of the magnet 34 and Hall effect sensor 82. In one embodiment, the controller 70 transmits the output voltage of the Hall effect sensor to a control panel via the wireless transmitter circuit 86. The output voltage value allows the health of the door sensing arrangement 10 and the installation to be checked remotely by the remote device 90 that determines if the output voltage value levels fall too low or too high for reliable operation. In another embodiment, the door/window magnetic sensing device 40 self-monitors the output voltage of the Hall effect sensor 82 and sends a trouble signal if the levels fall too low or too high for reliable operation. In one embodiment, the wireless transmitter circuit 86 uses the ZigBee RF protocol to communicate its alarm state or normal state to the alarm control panel of the remote device 90 via the wireless receiving circuit 104.
Besides state wireless signals, in one embodiment a low voltage trouble signal and an actual analog output voltage of the Hall effect sensor 82 are sent through a radio frequency interface. These signals and voltages allow the position of the magnet 34 to be corrected prior to generating a false alarm due to misalignment of the magnet 34 with respect to the Hall effect sensor 82. Thus, the magnetic field strength can be communicated through the door sensing arrangement to the installer via the remote device 90, or for display on a control panel of a central station, to help trouble shoot problems and verify proper operation and installation.
In some embodiments, the door is a metal door and/or the door frame is a metal door frame. Thus, the output of the Hall effect sensor 1.0 may vary in the open position. The controller 70 accounts for a slight variation and changes the alarm threshold value when the variation is more than a selected amount. Further, providing the Hall effect sensor 82 in the enclosure housing 42 away from a metal door or metal door frame when mounted reduces any magnetic effect of the metal door or metal door frame.
By using a Hall effect sensor 82, instead of other magnetic sensors, the magnet gap distance can be larger due to the increased sensitivity of the Hall effect sensor. This increased sensitivity and larger gap makes the door/window magnetic sensing device 40 easier to install and can accommodate difficult installations.
The door sensing arrangement 10 provides a signal strength indication to the installer. The indication tells the installer that there is significant signal strength margin for a reliable installation. The signal strength margin makes the installation more reliable and reduces false alarms. The make and break distance gap (Hysteresis) of the Hall effect sensor 82 and the magnet 34 is accurately controlled and reduces false alarms from normal door movements. In one embodiment, the make and break distance is automatically optimized by the door/window magnetic sensing device 40 to improve catch performance and reduce false alarms.
Millitesla (mT) is related to the magnetic flux density caused by the distance or gap, along with the orientation of the magnet 34.
While the above discussion is mainly directed to providing the sensing arrangement with a door and door frame, use with various types of window arrangements is also contemplated.
The controller 70 is a processor, microprocessor, ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) or other device for processing instructions and storing information in a memory. In one embodiment, the controller 70 executes algorithms or other programs to perform an alarm state, normal state and tamper state.
In some embodiments an alarm state signal, a normal state signal and a tamper state signal are not wireless signals.
Thus, the invention provides, among other things, a door/window magnetic sensing device 40 including a magnetic sensor configured to sense signal strength of a magnet and output a signal strength value, and a controller for receiving a signal strength value from the magnetic sensor, the controller configured to determine an alarm state, a normal state, and a tamper state from the signal strength value. Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional application 62/274,000, filed Dec. 31, 2015, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/069227 | 12/29/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/117397 | 7/6/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4866426 | Evans | Sep 1989 | A |
5668533 | Jackson, Jr. | Sep 1997 | A |
8269627 | Gore et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20060250297 | Prakah-Asante | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070139195 | Jin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090102649 | Diener et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100102907 | Schebel et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100218569 | Hunt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120112910 | Meyers | May 2012 | A1 |
20150348385 | Lamb et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160298950 | Modi | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2163713 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2711905 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2008288030 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2010129010 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2014138776 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Intl. Appl. No. PCT/US2016/069227 (dated Jul. 27, 2017). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2016/069227 dated Jul. 12, 2018 (13 pages). |
Examination Report No. 1 from the Intellectual Property Office of Australia for Application No. 2016380353 dated Sep. 11, 2018 (3 pages). |
Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China for Application No. 20168007714.3 dated Jul. 15, 2019 (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180365943 A1 | Dec 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62274000 | Dec 2015 | US |