BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 depicts the rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 1-6 in 0.01 M hydrochloric acid.
FIG. 2 depicts the rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 1-6 in 20% aqueous ethanol.
FIG. 3 depicts the rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 7-9 of hydrocodone in 0.01 N hydrochloric acid.
FIG. 4 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 7-9 of acetaminophen (APAP; also known as paracetamol) in 0.01 N hydrochloric acid.
FIG. 5 depicts the rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 7-9 of hydrocodone in 40% aqueous ethanol.
FIG. 6 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 7-9 of acetaminophen (APAP) in 40% aqueous ethanol.
FIG. 7 depicts a force transducer and an exemplary tablet holder having a tablet used for measuring breaking strength of tablets.
FIG. 8 depicts a cylinder with a wedge-shaped tip having certain exemplary dimensions useful for conducting “Pharma Test PTB 501” for measuring hardness of a tablet.
FIG. 9 (A) depicts the chemical structure for acetaminophen (APAP), (B) depicts half-life, Cmax, Tmax and AUC for some embodiments of the inventive formulation (30) following oral dose administration of this formulation (30) in male minipigs Goettingen) (C) depicts mean (±SEM) plasma concentrations of acetaminophen following oral dose administration of an embodiment of the inventive formulation (30) in male minipigs (Goettingen).
FIG. 10 (A) depicts half-life, Cmax, Tmax and AUC for certain embodiments of the inventive formulation (Forms 26, 27, 28, 29, 30), Control 1 and Control 2 in male minipigs (Goettingen) and Control 1 formulation in human (B) depicts mean (±SEM) plasma concentrations of acetaminophen following oral dose administration of certain embodiments of the inventive formulation (Forms 26, 27, 28, 29, 30), control 1 and control 2 in male minipigs (Goettingen) and Control 1 formulation in human.
FIG. 11 depicts mean (±SEM) plasma concentrations of acetaminophen following oral dose administration of certain embodiments of the inventive formulation (Forms 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30), Control 1 and Control 2 in male minipigs (Goettingen) and Control 1 formulation in human.
FIG. 12 (A) depicts half-life, Cmax, Tmax and AUC for certain embodiments of the inventive formulation (Forms 26, 27, 28 & 29), Control 1 and Control 2 in male minipigs (Goettingen) and Control 1 formulation; (B) depicts mean (±SEM) plasma concentrations of acetaminophen following oral dose administration of certain embodiments of the inventive formulation (Forms 26, 27, 28 & 29), Control 1 and Control 2 in male minipigs (Goettingen) and Control 1 formulation.
FIG. 13 (A) depicts chemical structure for hydrocodone; (B) depicts half-life, Cmax, Tmax and AUC following oral dose administration of certain embodiments of the inventive formulation (Forms 26, 27, 28 & 29), Control 1 and Control 2 in male minipigs (Goettingen) and Control 1 formulation; (C) depicts mean (±SEM) plasma concentrations of hydrocodone following oral dose administration of certain embodiments of the inventive formulation (Forms 26, 27, 28 & 29), Control 1 and Control 2 in male minipigs (Goettingen) and Control 1 formulation.
FIG. 14 depicts the rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 32-37 with respect to hydrocodone in 20% aqueous ethanol.
FIG. 15 depicts the rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 32-37 with respect to hydrocodone in 0.01 N hydrochloric acid.
FIG. 16 depicts the rate of dissolution of drug dosage form 31 with respect to hydrocodone in 0.01 N hydrochloric acid directly after manufacturing and after storage for 1 month at 25° C./60% relative humidity, at 40° C./75% relative humidity, and at 60° C. dry, respectively.
FIG. 17 depicts rate of dissolution of drug dosage form 31 with respect to acetaminophen (APAP) in 0.01 N hydrochloric acid directly after manufacturing and after storage for 1 month at 25° C./60% relative humidity, at 40° C./75% relative humidity, and at 60° C. dry, respectively.
FIG. 18 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 32, 34, and 36 with respect to acetaminophen (APAP) in 0.01 N hydrochloric acid+5% NaCl.
FIG. 19 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 32, 34, and 36 with respect to acetaminophen (APAP) in 0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 6.78.
FIG. 20 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 32, 34, and 36 with respect to acetaminophen (APAP) in 0.01 N HCl and 0.09% NaCl.
FIG. 21 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 32, 34, and 36 with respect to acetaminophen (APAP) in 0.01 N HCl.
FIG. 22 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 38-40 with respect to hydrocodone in 0.01 N HCl.
FIG. 23 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 38-40 with respect to acetaminophen (APAP) in 0.01 N HCl.
FIG. 24 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 38-40 with respect to hydrocodone in 40% aqueous ethanol.
FIG. 25 depicts rate of dissolution of various drug dosage forms 38-40 with respect to acetaminophen (APAP) in 40% aqueous ethanol.
FIG. 27 depicts mean acetaminophen concentration-time profiles for Form 45 and Control 1.
FIGS. 28 A and B depicts hydrocodone concentration-time profile for individual subject for Form 45 and Control 1, respectively.
FIGS. 29 A and B depicts acetaminophen concentration-time profile for individual subject for Form 45 and Control 1, respectively.
FIGS. 30 A and B depicts mean hydrocodone concentration-time profile for period 1 and 2, respectively for Form 45 and Control 1.
FIGS. 31 A and B depicts mean acetaminophen concentration-time profile by periods 1 and 2, respectively for Form 45 and Control 1.
FIGS. 32 A and B depicts mean hydrocodone and acetaminophen concentrations for in vitro Form 45, in vitro Control 1, in vivo Control 1 concentration and in vitro-in vivo concentration predictions for Form 45.
FIGS. 33 A and B depicts mean hydrocodone and acetaminophen in vitro dissolution profiles for Form 45 and Control 1