The present application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(b) of German Application No. DE 202014007282.5, filed Sep. 12, 2014, entitled “Dosing Apparatus.”
The present invention relates to a dosing apparatus for dosing a good, in particular a good to be dried such as a fermentation substrate or dung, comprising a conveyor for conveying a good to be dried in a conveying direction, wherein the good to be dried may be fed onto the conveyor by a feeding system and wherein the conveyor may deliver the good to be dried to a downstream unit such as a drying apparatus, and a control unit designed to control a conveying speed of the conveyor.
The present invention further relates to a method for dosing a good, in particular a good to be dried, such as a fermentation substrate or dung, comprising conveying a good to be dried, which has been fed onto a conveyor, in a conveying direction and controlling a conveying speed of the conveyor.
Dosing apparatuses and methods of the above type are known, for example, from DE 198 51 793 and DE 20 2008 003 498 U1 and are used, in particular, for drying fresh dung from layer houses or fermentation substrates from biogas plants. The drying of such goods is a prerequisite for storing and marketing such goods. Drying tunnels are preferably used for such drying, into which air such as the warm exhaust air from a layer house is fed through fans in a pressure corridor. Several layers of perforated drying belts are arranged above and next to the pressure corridor to allow the exhaust air to flow into the drying tunnel through lateral openings and through the perforations, thus dehydrating and drying the good. Drying can take place within a closed area if the air released by the drying tunnel is to be filtered. This allows for making the drying process largely odorless. A prerequisite for ideal drying is that the belts are loaded as evenly as possible with the good to be dried. To load the drying belts, the good to be dried is normally conveyed via infeed belts to a dosing apparatus which is mostly located at the top level of the drying tunnel. The good is released from the dosing apparatus onto the top drying belt and is then conveyed via the lower levels of the drying tunnel to show an as high as possible dry matter content once it leaves the drying tunnel. The dried good can then be transported further and stored without causing odor problems or, at the least, heavy odor problems.
To load, for example, a drying belt of a drying apparatus, the dosing apparatuses known from prior art have sections that in the presence of a specific mass value of the material located on the section stop the feeding or discharge of the good to thus allow for an even loading of the drying belt. Such dosing apparatuses and methods allow for adapting the dosing to various requirements and realizing a control that will preserve the drives of the conveyor belts. However, there is a need for further improved dosing apparatuses and methods.
One object of the present invention is, thus, to provide a dosing apparatus and method for dosing a good, in particular a good to be dried such as a fermentation substrate or dung, that will allow for improved and/or easier dosing. One particular object of the present invention is to provide a dosing apparatus and method for dosing a good, in particular a good to be dried such as a fermentation substrate or dung, that will allow for particularly even and/or exact dosing.
The present invention solves this problem by providing a dosing apparatus for dosing a good, in particular a good to be dried such as a fermentation substrate or dung, comprising a conveyor for conveying a good to be dried in a conveying direction, wherein the good to be dried may be fed onto the conveyor by a feeding system and wherein the conveyor may deliver the good to be dried to a downstream unit, such as a drying apparatus, and a control unit designed to control a conveying speed of the conveyor, wherein the conveyor is pivotally arranged about a vertical swivel axis, characterized in that the control unit is arranged and designed to control an oscillating movement, preferably a speed, in particular an angular speed, and/or a frequency of the oscillating movement, of the conveyor about the swivel axis.
The present invention is based, inter alia, on the finding that in order to achieve an as even as possible distribution of the good which is to be dried on a unit that is arranged down-stream of the dosing apparatus, such as a drying apparatus, it is advantageous to control not only the speed of the conveyor with a control unit but also a pivoting or oscillating movement of the conveyor about a vertical swivel axis.
The conveyor of the dosing apparatus may be designed, for example, as a belt conveyor having an endless conveyor belt, with the good to be dried being fed onto its upper run by a feeding system where the good to be dried can be delivered from the upper run to a down-stream unit, such as a conveyor belt of a drying apparatus, via one end located downstream of the conveying direction (also referred to as discharge end) by the movement of the upper run in the conveying direction.
Preferably, the conveyor has one or more drives allowing for the good that is to be dried to be conveyed in a conveying direction. If the conveying direction is designed as a conveyor belt having an endless conveyor belt, such drive may be, for example, a belt drive arranged, for example, in the shape of a deflection sheave at one end of the endless conveyor.
The control unit controls the conveying speed of the conveyor, i.e., the speed at which the good to be dried is moved in the conveying direction. The conveying speed of the conveyor can, thus, be used to indirectly control the amount of the good to be dried that is delivered onto the downstream unit.
According to the invention, the conveyor is pivotally arranged about a vertical swivel axis. It is preferred, in particular, for the discharge end of the conveyor via which the good to be dried may be delivered to the downstream unit to be pivotable about a vertical swivel axis that is preferably arranged in a section of the conveyor arranged at or close to the opposite end of the conveyor. Preferably, the vertical swivel axis is aligned orthogonally to a longitudinal axis of the conveyor in the conveying direction, preferably intersecting the longitudinal axis. It is particularly preferred for the vertical swivel axis to be arranged in such half, in particular, such third or fourth of the conveyor that is located at one end of the conveyor opposite to the discharge end of the conveyor.
The conveyor is pivotable about the vertical swivel axis preferably in a segment of about 90 degrees, preferably, and in particular, per about 45 degrees to either side based on a longitudinal axis of the conveyor in the conveying direction.
It is particularly preferred for a speed, in particular, an angular speed, and/or an oscillating frequency of the conveyor to be controlled when it oscillates about the swivel axis. An as even as possible distribution of the good, which is to be dried, on a unit that is located downstream of the dosing apparatus also depends, in particular, on the frequency and speed at which the conveyor performs its oscillating movement. A corresponding control may be thus applied in an advantageous manner to achieve an as exact and even as possible dosing.
One preferred embodiment provides for the control unit to be designed to control the oscillating movement, preferably a speed, in particular, an angular speed, and/or a frequency of the oscillating movement, of the conveyor about the swivel axis based on the conveying speed. Here, the control unit preferably links the control of the oscillating movement of the conveyor with the control of the conveying speed of the conveyor. Such linking can help further improve the dosing of the good to be dried that is delivered by the conveyor. It is particularly preferred for the speed, in particular, the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor about the swivel axis to be controlled based on the conveying speed at which the conveyor conveys the good to be dried.
Alternatively, a control unit can be provided designed to control the oscillating movement, preferably a speed, in particular, an angular speed, and/or a frequency of the oscillating movement, of the conveyor about the swivel axis based on the feed speed of a feeding system.
Preferably, a control unit is provided and designed such as to change the speed, in particular, the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor about the swivel axis along a path of motion of the conveyor. If the speed, in particular, the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor along its path of motion is not steady but varies, this may be used to achieve a particularly even distribution of the good which is to be dried on a unit located downstream of the dosing apparatus. Therefore, the control unit is preferably designed to increase, maintain, or reduce the speed, in particular, the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor about the swivel axis along the path of motion depending on the position of the conveyor.
According to another aspect of the invention, the above-mentioned object is solved by a dosing apparatus pursuant to the preamble of claim 1 or one of the previously described dosing apparatuses where the control unit is designed to control the conveying speed of the conveyor based on the oscillating movement, preferably the speed, in particular, the angular speed, and/or the frequency of the oscillating movement, of the conveyor about the swivel axis and/or to change the conveying speed of the conveyor along a path of motion of the conveyor.
This aspect is based, inter alia, on the finding that an as even as possible distribution of the good which is to be dried on a unit that is arranged downstream of the dosing apparatus, such as a drying apparatus, can be achieved also by controlling the conveying speed of the conveyor in a specific manner. Such specific controlling may consist of controlling the conveying speed of the conveyor based on the oscillating movement, in particular, based on the speed, in particular, the angular speed, and/or the frequency of the oscillating movement, of the conveyor about the swivel axis. However, such specific controlling may also consist of changing the conveying speed of the conveyor along a path of motion of the conveyor. If the conveying speed of the conveyor along its path of motion is not steady but varies, this may be used to achieve a particularly even distribution of the good which is to be dried on a unit located downstream of the dosing apparatus. Therefore, the control unit is preferably designed to increase, maintain, or reduce the conveying speed of the conveyor along the path of motion depending on the position of the conveyor.
What is particularly preferred is for the control unit to be designed to control the speed, in particular, the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor such that the speed, in particular the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor is greater in the area of the reversal points of a path of motion of the oscillating movement, preferably greater by a multiple, than between the reversal points, in particular, at one point halfway of the path of motion between the reversal points.
The reversal points are preferably the endpoints of the path of motion of the oscillating movement, i.e., the points where the conveyor changes its moving direction, i.e., where it comes to a brief halt after passing through a circular arc section and before starting to move again in the opposite direction. The path of motion is preferably arranged such that the point at halfway is the point on the longitudinal axis that extends in the conveying direction. Since the movement of the conveyor changes its direction at the reversal point of the oscillating movement, the speed of the conveyor must briefly drop to zero at the very reversal point, i.e., when the moving direction changes. Therefore, a greater speed in the area of the reversal points is to be understood to mean that the speed of the conveyor along the path of motion in the vicinity of the reversal points, i.e., shortly before or after the reversal points, is increased. Such area of the reversal points means, in particular, an area of approximately 10%, approximately 15%, approximately 20%, approximately 25%, or approximately 30% of the entire path of motion between the reversal points, with such area of approximately 10%, approximately 15%, approximately 20%, approximately 25%, or approximately 30% connecting to the reversal points directly at the ends of the path of motion.
The conveyor can be decelerated and/or the direction of the oscillating movement reversed, for example, by a mechanical stop at the reversal points. To this end, the dosing apparatus may, for example, show a sensor such as a roller sensor or roller lever on each side in the area of the discharge end, which will detect that the reversal point has been reached and which is preferably designed to then change the drive direction of a drive of the conveyor to achieve the oscillating movement, for example, via a reversing contactor control. Once the stop has been reached and the direction of the oscillating movement reversed, the conveyor's oscillating movement is again accelerated to target speed. When driving the conveyor to reach the oscillating movement by means of an electric motor, the time required to accelerate to target speed may depend on the ramp of the frequency converter and is preferably not more than 1 second and, in particular, not more than 0.5 seconds.
Here, an increased or target (angular) speed in the area of the reversal points is understood to mean, in particular, the (angular) speed which the conveyor has in its oscillating movement shortly before deceleration and/or after (re-)acceleration following the change in direction at the reversal point.
Such increase in speed, in particular, in angular speed, in the area of the reversal points prevents more good which is to be dried to accumulate at the sides of a downstream unit, in particular of a downstream conveyor belt, than between such sides. By decelerating the angular speed, the conveyor may deliver more good to be dried in the area of the path of motion at reduced speed, meaning that in the area between the two border areas of a downstream conveyor belt preferably the same amount of good to be dried may be delivered as in the border areas.
Furthermore, a particularly preferred embodiment of the dosing apparatus follows when designing the control unit such as to determine, especially through interpolation, the speed, in particular the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor for the remaining path of motion based on speeds, in particular angular speeds, that have been indicated for specific points of the path of motion.
The preferred speeds, in particular angular speeds, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor at certain points of the path of motion or in certain areas of the path of motion, such as in the area of the reversal points and/or at a point half way of the path of motion between the reversal points, can be determined particularly well based on tests, i.e., empirically. Such speeds determined based on tests can be provided in the control unit preferably as default speeds in these areas or points of the path of motion. For example, for various goods to be dried or goods to be dried having different properties one might also provide several such—preferably empirically determined—default speeds. In that case, the control unit is preferably designed to determine the speed also for the other sections of the path of motion, and thus preferably the speeds or speed curve over the entire path of motion, based on such default speeds, preferably by applying the method of interpolation. What is further preferred in this case is for the control unit to control the oscillating movement of the conveyor over the entire path of motion based on the default and the determined speeds or determined speed curve.
Another embodiment of the dosing apparatus provides for the latter to comprise a weighing apparatus arranged and designed to determine the weight of the good to be dried that is located on the conveyor. The determination of the weight of the good to be dried that is located on the conveyor is an important parameter that allows for exactly controlling the dosing.
What is moreover preferred is for the conveyor to have a plurality of load cells. It is particularly preferred for the conveyor to have four load cells, wherein preferably two load cells each are arranged crosswise to the conveying direction spaced apart at a first and at a second end of the conveyor. An arrangement of a plurality of load cells, in particular, of four load cells, in the above-described arrangement is preferred in order to be able to determine as precisely as possible the weight of the good to be dried that is located on the conveyor. Having the conveyor mounted on four load cells that are preferably arranged in the area of the conveyor's four corners has the advantage that this way one can determine the weight of the good located on the conveyor irrespective of how it is distributed over the length of the conveyor. This way, one can, for example, reduce or even eliminate the impact that a shift in the center of mass of the good on the conveyor or the impact that uneven feeding by a feeder has on weight determination. For example, deferred feeding of the good to be dried onto the conveyor may result in an uneven distribution of the good to be dried. Also, the center of mass of the good located on the conveyor will moreover change as a result of conveying the good along the conveyor. Preferably, the weighing apparatus, in particular, the plurality of load cells, is thus arranged such as to minimize the impact that the position of the good on the conveyor has on the weighing result.
What is moreover preferably provided is for the control unit to be designed such as to control the conveying speed and/or the oscillating movement, preferably a speed, in particular, an angular speed, and/or a frequency of the oscillating movement, of the conveyor about the swivel axis based on the amount and/or weight of the good that is to be dried and that is located on the conveyor and/or based on the amount fed by a feeding system per time unit and/or based on the weight fed by a feeding system per time unit. Another aspect that may be preferred is a control based on a feeding speed such as a conveying speed of an inlet belt conveyor.
What is moreover particularly preferred is for the control unit to be designed such as to provide the default speeds with a weight-dependent offset based on the weight of the good that is to be dried and that is located on the conveyor and to consider such offset when determining the speed, in particular the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor for the remaining path of motion. This way one can make weight-dependent changes to the oscillating movement of the conveyor to ensure an as even as possible dosing or discharge of the good even if the good to be dried is distributed unequally or unevenly on the conveyor.
What is furthermore preferred is an embodiment where the control unit is arranged and designed to receive one or more signals, preferably with information on one or more downstream units, such as on their conveying speed(s), and to control the conveying speed and/or the oscillating movement, preferably a speed, in particular, an angular speed, and/or a frequency of the oscillating movement, of the conveyor about the swivel axis based on the signal or signals received.
This embodiment provides for the control unit to be able to control the conveying speed and/or oscillating movement also based on one or more downstream units. With drying apparatuses for drying good such as fermentation substrate or dung, adjusting the conveying speeds of various drying apparatuses or drying belts to the amount and speed at which such good to be dried is fed into the drying apparatus is decisive for a good drying result. Therefore, it is advantageous if the dosing apparatus can also consider information, in particular, on process parameters such as the conveying speed of conveyor belts, of downstream units in order to be able to control the dosing apparatus such that the conveyor delivers such amount of good that is adjusted to the downstream units.
It is furthermore preferred for the control unit to be arranged and designed such as to generate one or more signals, preferably with information on the good to be delivered by the dosing apparatus, such as its amount, weight, the conveying speed at which the good is delivered, or other properties of the good, and to preferably send such signal(s) to one or more downstream units. This way, the dosing apparatus also allows for the control units of downstream units to control such downstream units based on one or more of the signals received by the control unit of the dosing apparatus and to, for example, adjust the conveying speeds of drying belts of drying apparatuses that are located downstream of the dosing apparatus to the type, amount, and speed of the good delivered by the dosing apparatus.
Another preferred embodiment of the dosing apparatus provides for the dosing apparatus to have two side walls that substantially extend parallel to the conveying direction and that are preferably and substantially aligned vertically, at least in sections, or that are tilted by less than 30 degrees, in particular by less than 10 degrees, to the vertical.
Providing two side walls has the advantage that the good located on the conveyor of the dosing apparatus can be held in place by the side walls, which prevents the good from falling off the sides of the conveyor in an uncontrolled manner. This way, it is delivered only at the intended location, preferably at the discharge end of the conveyor.
The design of the two side walls that are substantially vertical, at least in sections, or tilted by less than 30 degrees, in particular, by less than 10 degrees, to the vertical has the advantage that it allows for more precise weight determination.
What is moreover preferably provided is for the two side walls that substantially extend parallel to the conveying direction to each open by less than 5 degrees in conveying direction, in particular by 1 degree each. The good to be dried that is located on the conveyor is preferably delivered at the conveyor's discharge end located downstream in the conveying direction. It is, thus, advantageous for the two side walls to slightly open in the conveying direction, i.e., toward the conveyor's discharge end. This way, one can reduce or even prevent the good to be dried from accumulating at the conveyor's discharge end in conveying direction.
It is furthermore preferred for the dosing apparatus to have a control flap arranged substantially crosswise to the conveying direction, which is preferably affixed to the two side walls. The control flap is moreover preferably arranged in the area of the conveyor's end portion that is located downstream in the conveying direction, i.e., in the area of the conveyor's discharge end. Preferably, the control flap is detachably and/or movably affixed to the side walls.
It is furthermore preferred for the control flap to be pivotable about a horizontal adjusting axis and preferably fixable in various swivel positions. The control flap can be fixed in one or more different swivel positions by using, for example, a snap-on connection, a pin, or similar means.
What is moreover preferably provided is for the adjusting axis to be arranged such that a lower end of the control flap is pivotable about the adjusting axis so that the adjusting axis can assume one or more swivel positions in which the control flap is tilted from an upper end to a lower end in the conveying direction. Preferably, the tilt of the control flap from an upper end to a lower end in the conveying direction is approximately 30 to 60 degrees to the horizontal, for example, approximately 45 degrees to the horizontal.
It is furthermore preferred for the control flap to be designed and arranged such that a minimum distance between the control flap and the conveyor is not undercut and/or a maximum distance between the control flap and the conveyor is not exceeded.
The control flap and its possible embodiments have the advantage that a certain pressure can be applied on the good to be dried when or before being delivered by the dosing apparatus. At the same time, the tilted design of the control flap, in particular, has the advantage that it reduces or even prevents the good to be dried from banking up or jamming behind the control flap. This also promotes a continuous flow of the good.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, the object mentioned in the beginning is solved by a method for dosing a good, in particular a good to be dried such as fermentation substrate or dung, comprising conveying a good to be dried that is conveyed on a conveyor in a conveying direction, controlling a conveying speed of the conveyor, and controlling an oscillating movement, preferably a speed, in particular, an angular speed, and/or an oscillating frequency of the oscillating movement, of the conveyor about a vertical swivel axis of the conveyor.
The method according to the invention and its possible further developments show features and/or method steps that make them particularly suitable for use in a dosing apparatus according to the invention and its further developments.
As regards the advantages, embodiment variants, and embodiment details of the method according to the invention and its possible further developments, reference is made to the above description of the respective apparatus features.
Preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are described based on the enclosed Figures.
For purposes of description herein, the terms “upper,” “lower,” “right,” “left,” “rear,” “front,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as oriented in
The dosing apparatus shown in
The shown exemplary dosing apparatus 1 for dosing a good G, in particular a good to be dried such as a fermentation substrate or dung, has a conveyor 100 for conveying the good G to be dried in a conveying direction R. As can be seen in particular from
Conveyor 100 is designed as a conveyor belt with an endless belt that is located on several rolls 111 and deflected via two deflection sheaves 120, with preferably at least one of the deflection sheaves 120 being designed as a driven roll or belt drive to drive the upper run 110, on which the good is conveyed, in conveying direction R. The system is preferably driven by an electric motor. The conveying speed of the conveyor 100 can be controlled with a control unit (not shown), in particular by changing the drive speed of the belt drive.
The dosing apparatus 1 has two side walls 140 that substantially extend parallel to the conveying direction R. As can be seen in particular from
To determine the weight of the good G to be dried that is located in the conveying direction 100, the dosing apparatus 1 is equipped with a weighing apparatus in form of four load cells 160, with two load cells 160 each arranged at the discharge end 101 of the conveyor 100 and disposed crosswise to the conveying direction R and two further load cells 160 arranged at an end of the conveyor 100 opposite to the discharge end 101 and also disposed crosswise to the conveying direction R.
This arrangement of several load cells 160 has the advantage that the weight of the good G to be dried that is located in the conveying direction 100 can be determined in a reliable manner even if the good G is distributed unevenly and/or varyingly on the conveyor 100, as shown, for example, in
The conveyor 100 is pivotally arranged about a vertical swivel axis X. The vertical swivel axis X is aligned orthogonally to the longitudinal axis Y of the conveyor 100 and intersects the longitudinal axis. The vertical swivel axis X is furthermore arranged in such area of the conveyor 100 that approximately corresponds to one fourth of the extension of the conveyor 100 in the conveying direction R based on an end that lies opposite to the discharge end 101. This way, the oscillating movement of the conveyor 100 facilitates, in particular, an oscillating movement of the discharge end 101 of the conveyor 100 along a path of motion, which corresponds to a 90 degree circular arc section—as can be seen, in particular, in
The pivotable mounting about the swivel axis X is realized by means of a corresponding mounting device 131. The oscillating movement of the discharge end 101 is supported by a roll 132 that is preferably driven by an electric motor 133.
The control unit is arranged and designed to control the oscillating movement of the conveyor 100, wherein, for example, the drive 133 for driving the wheel 132 can be used for control purposes. Preferably, the control unit is designed, in particular, such as to change the speed, in particular the angular speed, and/or the oscillating frequency of the oscillating movement of the conveyor 100 about the swivel axis X, for example based on the conveying speed of the conveyor 100, based on information, such as conveying speeds, of one or more downstream units, such as drying apparatuses, and/or based on the weight of the good G located on the conveyor 100. The frequency of the oscillating movement can also be controlled by the control unit.
Here, the control unit is designed, in particular, such as to control the speed, in particular the angular speed, of the oscillating movements of the conveyor 100 such that the speed, in particular, the angular speed, of the oscillating movement of the conveyor 100 is greater in the area of the reversal points P1 and P5, in particular, greater by a multiple, than between the reversal points P1 and P5, in particular, at a point P3 half way of the path of motion between the reversal points P1 and P5, as can be seen, in particular, in
In
When the direction changes, the angular speed of the conveyor will briefly drop to zero at reversal points P1 and P5 (not shown in
Here in
However, controlling can be preferably also performed by providing target (angular) speeds at the reversal points, which the control unit will then use as target (angular) speeds in the area of the reversal points, i.e., shortly before deceleration and after (re)acceleration following the change in direction.
For example, if the oscillating frequency is to be changed due to the weight present on the dosing apparatus 1, the speed curve may be adjusted accordingly, for example, by providing the default speeds at the points P1-P5 with a specific offset and by having the control unit calculate a new speed curve based on such changed default values.
This way, one can achieve a particularly precise dosing with a particularly even distribution of the good to be dried on the downstream units.
Furthermore, the dosing apparatus 1 has a control flap 150 with a control flap wall 151 that is attached to the two side walls 140 at its upper end 1510 and whose lower end 151u shows a spacing from the upper run 110 of the conveying direction 100 and thus defines a discharge opening through which good G can be discharged by the conveyor 100.
The control flap wall 151 is tilted to the horizontal between the upper end 1510 and the lower end 151u in the conveying direction R. The control flap 150 is pivotable about a horizontal adjusting axis at the upper end 1510, which also allows for changing the spacing of the lower end 151u of the control flap 150 from the upper run 110 of the conveyor 100. The handling and fixing section 152 of the control flap 150 serves, inter alia, to move the control flap 150 and, in particular, the control flap wall 151 in different swivel positions and fix them there.
As can be seen in
The control flap 150 applies pressure on the good G, as shown by the arrow marked with 2 in
It is also important to note that the construction and arrangement of the elements of the invention as shown in the exemplary embodiments is illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments of the present innovations have been described in detail in this disclosure, those skilled in the art who review this disclosure will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible, e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc. without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter recited. For example, elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements shown in multiple parts may be integrally formed, the operation of the interfaces may be reversed or otherwise varied, the length or width of the structures and/or members or connector or other elements of the system may be varied, the nature or number of adjustment positions provided between the elements may be varied. It should be noted that the elements and/or assemblies of the system may be constructed from any of the wide variety of materials that provide sufficient strength or durability, in any of the wide variety of colors, textures, and combinations. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present innovations. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the desired and other exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present innovations.
It will be understood that any described processes or steps within described processes may be combined with other disclosed processes or steps to form structures within the scope of the present invention. The exemplary structures and processes disclosed herein are for illustrative purposes and are not to be construed as limiting.
It is to be understood that variations and modifications can be made on the aforementioned structure and method without departing from the concepts of the present invention, and further it is to be understood that such concepts are intended to be covered by the following claims unless these claims by their language expressly state otherwise.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2014 007 282 U | Sep 2014 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
503664 | Jones | Aug 1893 | A |
2074383 | Funk | Mar 1937 | A |
2149686 | Rivenburgh | Mar 1939 | A |
2808029 | Geerlings | Oct 1957 | A |
2842096 | Bradfield | Jul 1958 | A |
2884899 | Jackes et al. | May 1959 | A |
2969867 | McClelland | Jan 1961 | A |
3102511 | Atcheson | Sep 1963 | A |
3139065 | Willauer, Jr. | Jun 1964 | A |
3145793 | Ray | Aug 1964 | A |
3215252 | Wilkes | Nov 1965 | A |
3388690 | Hostetler | Jun 1968 | A |
3427929 | Dawson | Feb 1969 | A |
3511215 | Myers | May 1970 | A |
3696584 | Rickard | Oct 1972 | A |
3722743 | Atchley | Mar 1973 | A |
3738077 | Leach | Jun 1973 | A |
3759368 | Rose et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3770107 | Michelbach | Nov 1973 | A |
3811412 | Murto et al. | May 1974 | A |
3898435 | Pritchard et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3911868 | Brembeck | Oct 1975 | A |
3966049 | van den Berg | Jun 1976 | A |
3968904 | Neville | Jul 1976 | A |
3997388 | Simon | Dec 1976 | A |
4070990 | Swartzendruber | Jan 1978 | A |
4086998 | van der Schoot | May 1978 | A |
RE29944 | Hyer et al. | Mar 1979 | E |
4159696 | Martin | Jul 1979 | A |
4199051 | Kimberley | Apr 1980 | A |
4216742 | Kirchhofer | Aug 1980 | A |
4226211 | Barrentine | Oct 1980 | A |
4253120 | Levine | Feb 1981 | A |
4345682 | White et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348988 | Lawson | Sep 1982 | A |
4401057 | Van Gilst | Aug 1983 | A |
4416218 | Holz | Nov 1983 | A |
4418773 | Finet et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4476811 | Swartzendruber | Oct 1984 | A |
4527513 | Hart et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4542808 | Lloyd, Jr. et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4552095 | Segalla | Nov 1985 | A |
4575993 | Meyn | Mar 1986 | A |
4603657 | Peckskamp | Aug 1986 | A |
4675520 | Harrsen et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4676197 | Hoover | Jun 1987 | A |
4846337 | Kuhlmann | Jul 1989 | A |
4863009 | Winkel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868901 | Kniskern et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4959040 | Gardner | Sep 1990 | A |
4995343 | Cole et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007380 | Badia et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5046570 | Emme et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5092274 | Cole et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5097797 | Van Zee et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101765 | Manfrin | Apr 1992 | A |
5101766 | Runion | Apr 1992 | A |
5113797 | van Daele | May 1992 | A |
5119893 | Jost | Jun 1992 | A |
5165514 | Faulkner | Nov 1992 | A |
5222589 | Gordon | Jun 1993 | A |
5232080 | van Essen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5275131 | Brake et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5304745 | Rusk et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311839 | Pollock et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311977 | Dean et al. | May 1994 | A |
5365717 | McKinlay | Nov 1994 | A |
5406907 | Hart | Apr 1995 | A |
5435267 | Patterson | Jul 1995 | A |
5462017 | Pollock et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5490591 | Faulkner | Feb 1996 | A |
5497730 | van Daele et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5551822 | Pippin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5603285 | Kleinsasser | Feb 1997 | A |
5642688 | Bannier et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5718187 | Pollock et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5736682 | Heitmann et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5762021 | Horwood et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765503 | van Daele | Jun 1998 | A |
5778821 | Horwood et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794562 | Hart | Aug 1998 | A |
5875733 | Chen | Mar 1999 | A |
5884581 | Vandaele | Mar 1999 | A |
5927232 | Pollock | Jul 1999 | A |
5941193 | Cole | Aug 1999 | A |
5957083 | Cheng | Sep 1999 | A |
5964185 | DeBonne et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967083 | Kleinsasser | Oct 1999 | A |
6050220 | Kimmel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056109 | Hidai | May 2000 | A |
6066809 | Campbell et al. | May 2000 | A |
6152078 | Romeu Guardia | Nov 2000 | A |
6173676 | Cole | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6211470 | Beran et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223552 | Zimmerbauer | May 2001 | B1 |
6317656 | Kira | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6382404 | Guldenfels | May 2002 | B1 |
6383068 | Tollett et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394031 | Moller | May 2002 | B1 |
6401936 | Isaacs et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407523 | Allan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412439 | Otto-Lubker | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6470826 | Thuline | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6484886 | Isaacs et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6539893 | Otto-Lubker | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6625960 | Nambu | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6655317 | Steudler, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6732851 | Wienken | May 2004 | B2 |
6779488 | Corti et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7191895 | Zeitler | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7228817 | Busse | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7279645 | Inglin | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7552697 | Busse | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7573567 | Hershtik | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7878391 | Kalkhoff | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8127916 | Mix | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8168897 | Sudkamp | May 2012 | B2 |
8360230 | Rompe | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8590695 | Moreno Rueda | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20020152965 | Turner et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030192774 | Cotter et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040112713 | Haan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050063513 | Hsieh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050150747 | Menendez | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050217967 | Scott | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060039583 | Bickert et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20080251357 | Kawakami | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090020395 | Accettura | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090045029 | Deur | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100294624 | Warner | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110062000 | Yamamoto | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120160637 | Itoh et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120181150 | Damm | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130014704 | Kuking | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130092512 | Buschmann et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130206549 | Clevers et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130299317 | Moller | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1715083 | Aug 1982 | AU |
485 202 | Jan 1970 | CH |
201834531 | May 2011 | CN |
5 25 996 | Jun 1931 | DE |
1 820 785 | Aug 1960 | DE |
1 124 872 | Mar 1962 | DE |
1 406 150 | Mar 1969 | DE |
7 102 326 | Sep 1971 | DE |
2 155 120 | May 1972 | DE |
2 157 774 | May 1974 | DE |
2 313 663 | Oct 1974 | DE |
2 350 555 | Apr 1975 | DE |
118 839 | Mar 1976 | DE |
2 612 594 | Sep 1977 | DE |
2 802 542 | Jul 1979 | DE |
3 138 748 | Apr 1983 | DE |
3 326 706 | Feb 1984 | DE |
3 332 240 | Mar 1985 | DE |
34 19 883 | Nov 1985 | DE |
3 445 429 | Jun 1986 | DE |
3 525 460 | Feb 1987 | DE |
3 607 858 | Sep 1987 | DE |
4 036 112 | Apr 1994 | DE |
43 13 456 | May 1994 | DE |
43 05 559 | Aug 1994 | DE |
4 411 776 | Oct 1995 | DE |
195 46 626 | Jun 1997 | DE |
196 07 258 | Aug 1997 | DE |
197 07 155 | Aug 1997 | DE |
198 51 793 | Nov 1998 | DE |
198 07 231 | Sep 1999 | DE |
299 12 821 | Nov 1999 | DE |
199 06 916 | Aug 2000 | DE |
101 06 206 | Aug 2002 | DE |
101 64 100 | Apr 2003 | DE |
101 64 122 | May 2003 | DE |
203 15 118 | Feb 2004 | DE |
102 48 875 | Apr 2004 | DE |
102 55 072 | Jun 2004 | DE |
699 24 866 | Mar 2006 | DE |
2006 003 445 | Aug 2007 | DE |
2006 004 894 | Aug 2007 | DE |
20 2007 008 362 | Sep 2007 | DE |
20 2007 009 477 | Sep 2007 | DE |
20 2006 007 875 | Oct 2007 | DE |
20 2008 003 498 | Oct 2008 | DE |
10 2009 055 952 | Jun 2011 | DE |
20 2010 016 688 | May 2012 | DE |
20 2012 004 330 | Jul 2012 | DE |
20 2012 004 008 | Aug 2012 | DE |
10 2012 003987 | Aug 2013 | DE |
20 2012 010 170 | Mar 2014 | DE |
20 2012 010 693 | Mar 2014 | DE |
20 2012 010 694 | Mar 2014 | DE |
20 2013 001 238 | Jul 2014 | DE |
20 2013 010 980 | Apr 2015 | DE |
20 2015 102 303 | Jul 2015 | DE |
2010 70867 | Feb 2011 | EA |
0 287 874 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0 105 571 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0 387 242 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0 414 487 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 421 553 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0 718 218 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 891 704 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0 892 254 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1 077 026 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 145 631 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 306 326 | May 2003 | EP |
0 892 254 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 570 732 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1 856 971 | May 2007 | EP |
2 134 164 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1 671 901 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2 003 412 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2 045 198 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2 377 787 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2 850 927 | Mar 2015 | EP |
2449667 | Mar 2014 | ES |
1129736 | Jan 1957 | FR |
2030824 | Nov 1970 | FR |
2322809 | Apr 1977 | FR |
2483652 | Dec 1981 | FR |
2780247 | Dec 1999 | FR |
856296 | Dec 1960 | GB |
1 021 571 | Mar 1966 | GB |
1 022 509 | Mar 1966 | GB |
1 237 284 | Aug 1967 | GB |
1 406 164 | Apr 1973 | GB |
2 047 649 | Dec 1980 | GB |
2 080 663 | Feb 1982 | GB |
2 086 593 | May 1982 | GB |
2 125 756 | Aug 1982 | GB |
2 226 130 | Jun 1990 | GB |
S 5889508 | May 1983 | JP |
11079345 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11139526 | May 1999 | JP |
2000-235005 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-27612 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-287710 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2003-346124 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2007-175027 | Dec 2007 | JP |
8002232 | Nov 1981 | NL |
9400025 | Aug 1995 | NL |
1037320 | Sep 2009 | NL |
2129303 | Apr 1999 | RU |
1483470 | May 1989 | SU |
9743733 | Nov 1997 | WO |
2004004319 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2005 109111 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2009 092130 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2011136644 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012045622 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160075520 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |