The present disclosure is directed at a dosing method and apparatus for treatment of reductant urea solutions with water soluble organometallic catalyst precursors which convert to active catalyst compounds in diesel exhaust gas systems. The active catalysts then promote hydrolysis of isocyanic acid into ammonia and/or decomposition of relatively high molecular weight deposits which deposits may otherwise reduce selective catalytic reduction efficiency.
Internal combustion engines such as those found in cars and trucks may produce combustion byproducts and/or products of incomplete combustion which may exist in the engine exhaust and emit into the environment. Per emissions regulations, the exhaust may be treated to reduce the concentration of such products and, therefore, reduce pollution. Although spark ignition (i.e., gasoline) engines may use three-way catalytic converters to satisfy emissions regulations, compression ignition (i.e., diesel) engines typically employ two-way catalytic converters which may not efficiently reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx). Accordingly, diesel engines may include selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems in order to seek reduction in nitrogen oxide concentrations. Improving performance of such systems remains an ongoing area of research and development.
The present invention is directed to a method of reducing oxides of nitrogen in a diesel engine producing diesel exhaust. One provides a first reservoir of diesel emission fluid containing an aqueous based urea solution and a second reservoir of a catalyst precursor containing an organometallic compound dissolved in water. The diesel emission fluid and the water soluble organometallic compound are mixed and introduced into the diesel exhaust wherein the urea converts to ammonia and isocyanic acid and the catalyst precursor converts to a catalyst which converts the isocyanic acid to ammonia wherein the ammonia is provided to a selective catalytic reduction system and reacts with the oxides of nitrogen and provides nitrogen and water.
The present invention is also directed to a method of reducing oxides of nitrogen in a diesel engine producing diesel exhaust comprising providing a first reservoir of diesel emission fluid containing an aqueous based urea solution and providing a second reservoir of a catalyst precursor containing an organo-titanium compound dissolved in water and mixing said diesel emissions fluid and said organo-titanium compound dissolved in water. The urea converts to ammonia and isocyanic acid and the organo-titanium compound converts to titanium dioxide catalyst. The titanium dioxide catalyst then converts the isocyanic acid to ammonia. In addition the selective catalyst reduction system contains one or more compounds of biuret, triuret, cyanuric acid, ammelide, ammeline or melamine and the titanium dioxide catalyst promotes thermal decomposition and removal of said one or more compounds from the selective catalytic reduction system.
In apparatus form, the present invention is directed at an exhaust after-treatment system comprising a first reservoir of diesel emission fluid containing an aqueous based urea solution, a second reservoir of a catalyst precursor containing an organometallic compound dissolved in water, a selective catalyst reduction system configured to convert urea to ammonia and reduce NOx to nitrogen and water, and a dosing unit comprising a liquid injector that combines and mixes the diesel emission fluid from the first reservoir and the catalyst precursor from the second reservoir wherein the dosing unit is configured to inject the mixture into the selective catalyst reduction system.
The various aspects and advantages of the present disclosure may be better understood by reference to the following detailed description, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Urea is used as a convenient source of ammonia (NH3) reductant in SCR systems for decreasing NOx emissions from diesel engines. Urea (H2NCONH2) is therefore a component of what is termed a diesel emission fluid (DEF) that is preferably introduced as a spray into the exhaust gases upstream of the SCR catalyst. The DEF vaporizes and the urea thermally decomposes into NH3 and HNCO (isocyanic acid), with subsequent hydrolysis of the HNCO into additional amounts of NH3 along with CO2:
The ammonia as formed above may then be utilized as the reductant in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) to reduce NOx to nitrogen and water. Such reactions include the following:
4NH3+4NO+O2→4N2+6H2O
2NH3+NO+NO2→2N2+3H2O
8NH3+6NO2→7N2+12H2O
However, urea is observed to deposit on the walls of the exhaust system and/or the SCR catalyst as solid urea or as a deposit mixture of urea and isocyanic acid. Over time, in the presence of relatively hot exhaust gases, secondary reactions can occur in which such deposits (urea and isocyanic acid) convert to a range of relatively higher molecular weight compounds. Such higher molecular weight compound deposits may include one or more of the following:
The deposits, once formed, then serve to reduce the efficiency of the exhaust gas treatment by either reducing exhaust gas flow and/or reducing efficiency of the SCR catalyst from efficient reaction with ammonia to reduce NOx gas concentration. In addition, although heating to elevated temperature such as in the range of 193° C. to 700° C. can serve to decompose the above identified relatively high molecular weight deposits, as well as polymeric type deposits, it can be appreciated that this adds a level of complexity to the system and potential for other associated problems.
Attention is directed to
It is therefore useful to note that with respect to the above, one avoids the need to combine the aqueous catalyst precursor into the diesel emissions fluid or aqueous based urea solution. In that regard, it is noted that the freshly prepared urea water solution has a neutral pH, whereas urea water solutions that have been stored for relatively longer periods of time may have a pH value of 10.5 (alkaline). Such variation in pH may therefore have an impact on the stability and/or solubility of the aqueous catalyst precursors herein if incorporated directly into the urea water solution. Accordingly, as illustrated in
In addition, as also can be appreciated from
Stated another way, the present invention allows one to introduce different levels of catalyst precursor solution to the SCR system as a function of the temperature of the SCR system 20. This can be achieved by dosing unit 22 which includes a processor that monitors the temperature of the SCR system 20 and determines the wt. % of catalyst precursor to introduce into the SCR system based on temperature measurements and stored data regarding the levels of catalyst precursor suitable for use at a selected temperature. It will be further appreciated that since the temperature of the SCR system is influenced by the exhaust temperature, the present invention also includes the ability to introduce different levels of catalyst precursor solution to the SCR system as a function of exhaust temperature.
The catalyst precursor herein is preferably one that has a requisite amount of solubility in aqueous solution within the reservoir 24 and which is capable of decomposition at temperatures similar to those that are relied upon to convert urea into ammonia. Preferably, the temperature range for decomposition of the catalyst precursor is 45° C. to 180° C., more preferably in the range of 75° C. to 125° C. Such catalyst precursors, upon decomposition at such temperatures in the exhaust gas after-treatment system will then operate to provide a target catalyst which serves to achieve one or more of the following: (1) hydrolyze the isocyanic acid to form ammonia to assist in SCR; (2) reduce and/or eliminate the build-up of relatively higher molecular weight deposits that would otherwise be formed from the isocyanic acid; and (3) decompose the relatively higher molecular weight deposit compounds found in the exhaust gas after treatment system, such as within the SCR system 20 (e.g., biuret, triuret, cyanuric acid, ammelide, ammeline, and/or melamine). This decomposition is contemplated to occur at temperatures that are lower than the temperatures that are typically relied upon for their thermal decomposition (e.g. pyrolysis) and removal.
The catalyst precursors herein preferably include water soluble organometallic compounds that will upon decomposition provide the catalytic activity noted above. Preferably, such organometallic compounds include titanium acetates such as titanium(IV) acetate (C8H12O8Ti) which is water soluble and has a boiling point of 117° C. and which is therefore suitable for use as part of the diesel emission fluid. Upon heating (exposure to elevated temperature exhaust gases) the titanium(IV) acetate will decomposes to provide catalytic titanium oxide which may proceed according to the following general reaction:
C8H12O8Ti+8O2→TiO2+8CO2+6H2O
Accordingly, the titanium oxide (TiO2) as the target catalyst will now conveniently serve to improve the exhaust gas treatment by hydrolyzing the isocyanic acid present to ammonia in order to reduce and/or eliminate the build-up of relatively higher molecular weight deposits. In addition, as noted, the TiO2 will allow for decomposition of any relatively high molecular weight deposits that may be present, and provide for such decomposition at relatively lower temperatures than ordinarily used for thermal (pyrolytic) decomposition.
Other water soluble organometallics that may be combined with the DEF are contemplated to include titanium(IV) bis(ammonium lactato)dihydroxide (C6H18N2O8Ti), which is another water soluble titanium complex and is available as a 50 wt. % in water solution (Sigma-Aldrich) with a flash point of 27° C. Accordingly, upon exposure to elevated temperatures in the exhaust gases, the following accounts for the formation of the target titanium dioxide catalyst:
[CH3CH(O−)CO2NH4]2Ti(OH)2+6O2→TiO2+6CO2+6H2O+2NH3
Another candidate catalyst precursor is contemplated to include titanium(III)oxalate decahydrate (Ti2(C2O4)3-10H2O). It may therefore be appreciated the preferably, the catalyst precursor may therefore comprise one or more of titanium(IV) acetate, Ti(IV)bis(ammonium lactato)dihydroxide or titanium(III)oxalate. Accordingly, mixtures of such water soluble organometallic catalyst precursors may be employed.
Other preferred catalyst precursors are contemplated to include ammonium titanyl oxalate (ATO), C4O9N2H8Ti, having the following structure:
A still further preferred precursor includes titanium oxyacetylacetonate, C10H14O5Ti having the following structure:
A still further preferred precursor includes Zr4+ compounds such as zirconia dioxide (ZrO2). Similar to TiO2 disclosed above, it is contemplated that ZrO2 can similarly serve to improve the exhaust gas treatment by hydrolyzing the isocyanic acid present to ammonia:
It is therefore contemplated herein that with respect to a given urea-water solution containing a catalyst precursor comprising a water soluble organometallic compound, such as an organometallic compound as noted above that decomposes to form TiO2, one may include a Zr4+ type compound, such as ZrO2. As may now be appreciated, in the event that isocyanic acid deposits are formed on the walls of the exhaust system or SCR catalyst, the ZrO2 can additionally serve to reduce such deposits and improve SCR performance.
Therefore, in the broad context of the present disclosure, the organometallic compounds are preferably selected from organo-titanium compounds, which as noted have solubility in water, wherein the solubility is preferably at a level sufficient to allow the organo-titanium compound, as the catalyst precursor, to decompose in the exhaust gases and provide a sufficient amount of catalyst (TiO2) to then hydrolyze the isocyanic acid present to ammonia. Such water solubility of the organometallic compound catalyst precursor in water is contemplated to be at a level of 0.1 wt. % to 50.0 wt. %, more preferably in the range of 10.0 wt. % to 50.0 wt. %, as well as 25.0 wt. % to 50.0 wt. %. The solubility is such that it is contemplated to be maintained at a temperature range between −11° C. (the freezing point of a 32.5% urea water solution) and 50° C.
It is further contemplated the amount of catalyst, derived from the water soluble organometallic precursor, is then preferably formed in the exhaust after-treatment system 12 at a level of 0.01 wt. % to 2.0 wt. % within the DEF comprising the aqueous urea solution. Accordingly, one may preferably employ an amount of, e.g. titanium(IV) acetate (C8H12O8Ti) precursor, such that upon delivery and decomposition to titanium oxide in the exhaust gas after-treatment system, the level of titanium oxide in the injected DEF is in the range of 0.01 wt. % to 2.0 wt. %.
Moreover, as alluded to above, one may optionally include ZrO2 in the aqueous catalyst precursor solution reservoir 24 to augment the ability to reduce isocyanic acid deposits. Therefore, it is contemplated that the level of ZrO2 in the aqueous catalyst precursor solution, either on its own or in combination with an organometallic precursor catalyst, is similarly in the range of 0.01 wt % to 1.0 wt. %.
Attention is next directed to
Accordingly, by introduction of the catalyst precursor herein into the DEF as discussed above, and as shown in
In addition, the catalyst precursors herein can serve to facilitate a relatively lower temperature degradation of the relatively high molecular weight compounds forming the deposits comprising biuret, cyanuric acid, ammelide, ammeline and melamine, and such degradation may now occur in the temperature range of 130° C. to 300° C.
Reference is next made to
Reference is next made to
CO(NH2)2+H2O→2NH3+CO2
An addition testing evaluation was run to further confirm the use of the catalyst precursors herein to reduce deposits. Two conditions were considered. Condition 1 consisted of a moderate duty cycle injection at relatively low temperature. More specifically, a DEF injector duty cycle of 13.1%, a target gas temperature of 215° C., engine speed of 1375 rpm, exhaust flow of 670 kg/hr for a time of 1.0 hour. Condition 2 consisted of a high duty cycle injection at high temperature. In both cases after 1.0 hour the exhaust pipe was disassembled and deposits were collected and weighed.
For Condition 1, and utilizing a DEF, namely a urea water solution, after 1.0 hour of operation 0.4 g of deposits were recovered from the mixer region and 4.2 g were recovered from the elbow region, with a total amount of deposits of 4.6 g. By contrast, when using 0.2 mol. % ATO in the same urea water solution, only 0.2 g of deposits were recovered from the mixer region and only 0.7 g of deposits were recovered from the elbow region for a total mass of recovered deposits of 0.9 g. As may therefore be appreciated, in the absence of the ATO catalyst precursor the deposit mass increased 411% (0.9 g versus 4.6 g). For Condition 2, and again utilizing a urea water solution, after 1.0 hour of operation, 6.4 g of deposits were recovered from the mixer region. By contrast, when using 0.2 mol. % ATO in the same urea water solution, only 3.5 g of deposits were recovered from the mixer region. As may therefore be appreciated, in the absence of the ATO catalyst precursor the deposit mass increased 45% (6.4 g versus 3.5 g).
Accordingly, some of the remarkable benefits of the aforementioned use of the catalyst precursors herein therefore includes the ability to now improve emissions by allowing for DEF injection at relatively lower exhaust temperatures (e.g. 185° C. to 250° C.) to then reduce deposit formation that otherwise compromises the efficiency of the SCR system. In other words, the catalyst precursors herein will provide for reduced cold start emissions on vehicles equipped with a SCR catalyst. In addition, the reduction in deposit formation as described herein is such that it is contemplated to reduce system backpressure. System backpressure in turn results in an increase in fuel consumption. By reducing deposits there will therefore be a reduction in fuel consumption in the vehicle. In addition, by reducing deposits, the requirement for a high temperature regeneration period to breakdown and remove the deposits can be reduced or avoided. Furthermore, the identified high molecular weight deposits herein are such that they tend to have corrosive effects when in contact with the metals utilized in exhaust piping. Reduction or removal of such deposits therefore is contemplated to extend the lifetime of the metallic exhaust system and reduce or eliminate loss of its structural integrity.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5087431 | Gardner-Chavis et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5171558 | Gardner-Chavis et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5342599 | Slone | Aug 1994 | A |
5827490 | Jones | Oct 1998 | A |
6024774 | Nakagawa et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6203770 | Peter-Hoblyn et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6361754 | Peter-Hoblyn et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
7572318 | Jadhav et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7708806 | Wright et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7744845 | Stephenson | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7909911 | Lackner et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7938893 | Doong et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8083836 | Wright et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088197 | Wright et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8163065 | Lackner et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8176731 | Doring | May 2012 | B2 |
8337589 | Wright et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8454732 | Huang et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20040040288 | Jacob | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20090101008 | Lackner et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090269265 | Ando | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110268636 | Lackner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130064724 | Huang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140369910 | Ayyappan et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160051931 | Ito | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160074809 | Goffe | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 894 523 | Feb 1999 | EP |
304 4564 | Jun 2017 | FR |
2013541662 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2012104205 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Synthesis of Superfine Titania via High-Temperature Hydrolysis . . . ” D. A. Matolygina et al., vol. 441, Part 2, pp. 361-364, Doklady Chemistry, ISSN 0012-5008, Pleiades Publishing Ltd., Dec. 2011. (Year: 2011). |
Bernhard, et al; Catalytic Urea Hydrolysis in the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx: Catalyst Screening and Kinetics on Anatase TiO2 and ZrO2; The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013, Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 3, pp. 942-951. |
Bernhard, et al; “Hydrolysis and Thermolysis of Urea and its Decomposition Byproducts Biuret, Cyanuric Acid and Melamine Over Anatase TiO2”; Applied Catalysis B: Environmental vol. 115-116, (2012) pp. 129-137. |
Engine and Aftertreatment Technologies—Lubrizol <<https://www.lubrizol.com/Lubricant-and-Fuel-Additives/Engine-Oil>> accessed Mar. 7, 2018. |
Hauck, et al; “Surface Chemistry and Kinetics of the Hydrolysis of Isocyanic Acid on Anatase”; ScienceDirect; Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 70, 2007, pp. 91-99. |
Ida, et al., “Mechanism of High-Temperature CO2 Sorption on Lithium Zirconate,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003, 37(9), pp. 1999-2004. |
Johnson, T.V.; “Diesel Emissions in Review”; SAE International, 2011-01-0304; Published Apr. 12, 2011 (15 pgs). |
Kleemann, M., et al; “Hydrolysis of Isocyanic Acid on SCR Catalysts”;—Ind. Eng. Chem Res. 2000, vol. 39, pp. 4120-4126. |
Majewski; “Selective Catalytic Reduction”; DieselNet Technology Guide, Diesel Catalysts; <<https://www.dieselnet.com/tech/cat_scr.php>> (accessed Aug. 30, 2016). |
Matolygina, et al; “Synthesis Of Superfine Titania via High-Temperature Hydolysis of Titanium (IV) Bis(ammonium lactato) Dihydroxide”; Doklady Chemistry: vol. 441 Part 2, pp. 361-364, Nov. 2011. |
Nair, et al., “Lithium Based Ceramic Materials and Membranes for High Temperature CO2 Separation,” Progress in Materials Science 54 (2009) 511-541. |
Piazzesi, G., PhD; Thesis: “The Catalytic Hydrolysis of Isocyanic Acid (HNCO) in the Urea-SCR Process”; dissertation submited to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH No. 16693, Zurich, 2006 (164 pgs). |
Strots, et al; “Deposit Formation in Urea-SCR Systems”; SAE International, 2009, Journal of Fuels and Lubricants., vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 283-289. |
Zahn, et al; “Catalytic Hydrolysis of S-Triazine Compounds Over A12O3”; Catalysis Today, vol. 27 (1996), pp. 167-173. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/843,401 (13 pgs). |