Dot peen mark image acquisition

Abstract

A mark reader apparatus has a lens and an autofocus system that manipulates the lens in accordance with control signals. An image acquisition system measures a distance from the lens to a dot peened mark. A processor is programmed to: calculate a focus position for the autofocus system that focuses the lens on the dot peened mark; apply an offset to the calculated focus position to produce an offset focus position; control the autofocus system by positioning the autofocus system to the offset focus position; and via the image acquisition system, acquire an image of the mark with the autofocus system set to the offset focus position.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to image acquisition and decoding of dot peened markings such as in direct part marking (DPM). While the present invention was developed for dot peen markings, it may have other applications to similar markings made up of an array of dots without limitation.

BACKGROUND

Direct Part Marking (DPM) technology is used to provide a machine readable code that is a permanent marking of the material of a part or component. This may be accomplished, for example, through dot-peen marking. In dot peen marking, a hard pin (e.g., carbide or diamond tip assembly) is caused to strike the surface of a part to form a pattern of dots that create a permanent mark. Dot peen marking machines can use an electromechanical or pneumatically driven marking pin to stamp (or peen) a series of dots to form the desired marking that may represent, for example, a bar code or quick response (QR) code, text, logos, or 2D Data Matrix codes.

Codes such as QR codes can be used to permanently mark a part or product, but conventional image acquisition and decoding systems designed to read higher resolution inked codes may have difficulty correctly reading the codes generated using dot peen technology. Therefore, a need exists for improvements in the technology for reading dot peened DPM.

SUMMARY

Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention embraces methods and apparatus for machine reading of a dot peened mark.

In an example embodiment, a method consistent with the present teachings involves: measuring a distance from a lens to a dot peened mark; calculating a focus position for an autofocus system that focuses the lens on the dot peened mark; applying an offset to the calculated focus position to produce an focus motor position; controlling the autofocus system by setting the autofocus system to the offset focus position; and acquiring an image of the mark with the autofocus system set to the offset focus position.

In accord with certain embodiments the offset is adequate to cause adjacent dots in the dot peened mark to appear merged in the acquired image. In accord with certain embodiments, the offset is determined prior to applying the offset. In accord with certain embodiments, determining the offset comprises determining an offset value by reference to stored values (e.g., a table or graph). In accord with certain embodiments, determining the offset comprises calculating the offset using one of the following equations:

$\mathrm{Offset}=\frac{\alpha \times \mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}}{\mathrm{distance}\mathrm{to}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}};$ $\mathrm{Offset}=\beta \times \mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}\times \left(\gamma +\mathrm{motor}\mathrm{position}\right);$ $\mathrm{and}$ $\mathrm{Offset}=\eta \times \mathrm{measured}\mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots};$

where the values of α, β and γ, and η are constants that depend on the autofocus mechanism and the lens.

In accord with certain embodiments, the process also involves determining whether or not the image to be acquired is that of a dot peened mark and if not, setting the offset to zero instead of the calculated offset. In accord with certain embodiments, the process also involves decoding the mark at a decoder by using the acquired image of the mark.

Another method involves: measuring a distance from a lens to a dot peened mark; calculating a focus position for an autofocus system that focuses the lens on the dot peened mark; determining an offset to the calculated focus position; applying the offset to the calculated focus position to produce an offset focus position; controlling the autofocus system by positioning the autofocus system to the offset focus position; acquiring an image of the mark with the autofocus system set to the offset focus position; and decoding the mark at a decoder by using the acquired image of the mark.

In certain embodiments, the offset is adequate to cause adjacent dots in the dot peened mark to appear merged in the acquired image. In certain embodiments, determining the offset comprises determining an offset value by reference to stored values (e.g., from a table or graph). In certain embodiments, determining the offset comprises calculating the offset using one of the following equations:

$\mathrm{Offset}=\frac{\alpha \times \mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}}{\mathrm{distance}\mathrm{to}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}};$ $\mathrm{Offset}=\beta \times \mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}\times \left(\gamma +\mathrm{motor}\mathrm{position}\right);$ $\mathrm{and}$ $\mathrm{Offset}=\eta \times \mathrm{measured}\mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots};$

where the values of α, β and γ, and η are constants that depend on the autofocus mechanism and the lens.

In certain embodiments, the process further involves determining whether or not the image to be acquired is that of a dot peened mark and if not, setting the offset to zero instead of the calculated offset.

In another example embodiment, a mark reader apparatus has a lens and an autofocus system that manipulates the lens in accordance with control signals. An image acquisition system measures a distance from the lens to a dot peened mark. A processor is programmed to: calculate a focus position for an autofocus system that focuses the lens on the dot peened mark; apply an offset to the calculated focus position to produce an offset focus position; control the autofocus position by positioning the autofocus system to the offset focus position; and via the image acquisition system, acquire an image of the mark with the autofocus system set to the offset focus position.

In certain embodiments, the offset is adequate to cause spaces between adjacent dots in the dot peened mark to appear merged in the acquired image. In certain embodiments, the processor is further programmed to determine the offset prior to applying the offset. In certain embodiments, determining the offset involves determining an offset value by reference to stored values (e.g., from a table or graph). In certain embodiments, a value of the offset is determined by calculating the offset using one of the following equations:

$\mathrm{Offset}=\frac{\alpha \times \mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}}{\mathrm{distance}\mathrm{to}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}};$ $\mathrm{Offset}=\beta \times \mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}\times \left(\gamma +\mathrm{motor}\mathrm{position}\right);$ $\mathrm{and}$ $\mathrm{Offset}=\eta \times \mathrm{measured}\mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots};$

where the values of α, β and γ, and η are constants that depend on the autofocus mechanism and the lens.

In certain embodiments, the processor is further programmed to determine whether or not the image to be acquired is that of a dot peened mark and if not, set the offset to zero instead of the calculated offset. In certain

embodiments, a decoder decodes the mark by using the acquired image of the mark. In certain embodiments, the autofocus system includes a motor, and the offset is an offset to the motor position.

The foregoing illustrative summary, as well as other exemplary objectives and/or advantages of the invention, and the manner in which the same are accomplished, are further explained within the following detailed description and its accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts an example block diagram of a barcode reader consistent with certain embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is an example of an acquired image of a dot peened QR code.

FIG. 3 is an example of an acquired image of a dot peened QR code with the autofocus system of the image acquisition system incorporating an autofocus motor offset in a manner consistent with certain embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is an example of a functional block diagram of a barcode reader system consistent with certain embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is an example of a block diagram of a barcode reader system consistent with certain embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an example process consistent with certain embodiments of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention embraces a method and apparatus for dot peen DPM decoding using autofocus apparatus.

In accord with certain example embodiments, the image acquisition system is altered in order to apply an offset to the motor position for an autofocus motor. The distance to the mark is measured and an offset is applied that causes the dots to merge and become easier for machine reading.

With reference to FIG. 1, a barcode reader can be viewed as having two main components: the decoder 10 that is used to decode barcodes and QR codes such as 14 within captured images, and an image acquisition system 20 that is used to

capture the images sent to the decoder 10. In an example of such a system, the image is captured through a lens 24 whose focus is adjusted by an autofocus motor.

When dot peen DPM marks are decoded using current technology, the decoder is specially adapted to reliably decode the dotted image as compared with more conventional markings. Such decoders are commonly processor based and the algorithms that run on the processor to decode such images can take significant processing time to execute. But, without such specialized algorithms, the marks are often difficult to reliably decode.

In accord with certain embodiments consistent with the present invention, the acquisition process including the autofocus process can be modified so that a more readily decodable image is acquired and sent to the decoder. In this manner, the decoder can decode the mark successfully without the use of dot peen specific decoding algorithms.

In accord with certain example embodiments, the acquisition system and more precisely the autofocus system is modified in order to apply an offset to an autofocus position that is normally calculated according to a measured distance to the mark. This offset results in an image of the mark to be acquired slightly out of focus so that the boundaries of the dots in the dot peened mark are removed or lessened so that the mark is readable by conventional (and faster) decoding algorithms.

In the examples given below, the autofocus system is a motor driven system in which the offset is applied to a motor position. However, generally speaking, the offset can be applied to any autofocus system so that the focus is offset in any suitable manner consistent with the particular autofocus system at hand. Hence, in the discussion that follows, application of an offset to an autofocus motor position is but one example of how a focus offset can be applied generally to any autofocus system.

Intuitively, one would generally feel that the sharpest possible image would yield the best detection. However, in the case of dot peened marks and conventional decoder operation, the representation of the image as an arrangement of dots turns out to be difficult to properly decode. However, when the image is slightly de-focused, conventional decoders interpret the slightly blurred dots which fill spaces between adjacent dots more accurately than if the focus is perfect.

The image shown in FIG. 2 is an example of a dot peened QR code that has been captured using a conventional autofocus process. This image has sharply defined dots that form a QR code, but such image requires specific algorithms on the decoder in order to be decoded. Conventional QR decoding algorithms are likely to produce errors.

When a small offset is applied to the autofocus motor (which depending on the measured distance to the mark), the dots appear to merge, and the image becomes easier for conventional decoding processes to capture.

The image of FIG. 3 is an image of the same QR code of FIG. 2 which has been captured using the offset discussed above. In this image the dots have largely merged together to make a QR code that is more readily readable using conventional decoder algorithms. Of course, this is not to suggest that optimization of the decoder cannot be carried out, but with the dots merged, conventional decoders become quite adept at reading dot peened marks without having to enable specific algorithms for dot peened marks.

Referring now to FIG. 4, a more detailed view of an example embodiment consistent with the present invention is depicted with decoder 10 and a portion of the image acquisition system 20. In this example, the autofocus system is a motor driven system, but the process can be generalized for any autofocus system without limitation by adjusting the focus in any suitable manner using an offset as taught herein. In order to acquire a suitable image in accord with the present teachings, the image acquisition process of system 20 first makes a distance measurement at 32 which is conventionally used by the autofocus system to assure a sharply focused image. Based on this distance, the system can calculate a motor position at 36 for a motor that drives a lens assembly so as to focus the lens on the mark.

In the present embodiment, the user can set the system into a mode that is adapted for reading dot peen marks and if this mode is enabled at 40, then the system calculates a small autofocus motor offset to be applied to the motor position at 44. This offset is added to the motor position calculation from 36 at 48 and the sum is used to actually position the autofocus motor using an autofocus motor position controller at 52. As a result, the autofocus system adjusts the image acquisition system's lens so that it is slightly out of focus when the image acquisition occurs at 56 so that the decoder 10 is provided with an image in which the spaces between the dots in the dot peened mark are lessened or removed. This permits the decoder 10 to rapidly decode the mark as represented by the image that has been acquired.

In certain example embodiments, the user can select between a dot peen mode in which the offset is applied and another mode in which no offset is applied. In one example, this can be accomplished when not in the dot peen mode at 40, the autofocus motor offset can simply be set to zero at 60 and the process proceeds to 44 with the effects of the offset calculation being overridden to an offset of zero.

In accord with certain example embodiments, a small offset is applied to the autofocus motor position as described above so as to create a slight de-focusing of the image being captured. This causes the spaces between the dots of the dot peened mark to largely disappear. The amount of offset can be established in any number of ways. For example, for varying distances of the reader to the mark, the amount of offset can be determined experimentally by incrementally adding an amount of offset until spaces between dots merge. If too much offset is added, the image may become too out of focus, so the amount of offset for a given distance is adjusted to achieve an image with merged dots and little more. In another example embodiment, the amount of offset can be gradually increased until the captured image is quickly and reliably decoded by the decoder.

For multiple focus distances, a table or graph of suitable offsets can be generated and the correct offset for a given distance can be looked up. In this case such a lookup is considered a “calculation” for purposes of this discussion.

In another example embodiment consistent with the present invention, the offset can be calculated as follows:

If the distance between the dots of the mark and the distance to the mark are known:

$\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{Offset}=\frac{\alpha \times \mathrm{distance}\mathrm{between}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{dots}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}}{\mathrm{distance}\mathrm{to}\mathrm{the}\mathrm{mark}}& \mathrm{Eqn}.1\end{array}$ where the value of α is an empirically determined constant that depends on the autofocus mechanism and the lens.

If the distance between the dots of the mark and the motor position are known:Offset=β×distance between the dots of the mark×(γ+motor position)   (2)where the values of β and γ are empirically determined constants that depend on the autofocus mechanism and the lens.

If the distance between the dots of the mark is measured in the image (in pixels):Offset=η×measured distance between the dots   (3)where the value of η is an empirically determined constant that depends on the autofocus mechanism and the lens.

As discussed above, in certain embodiments, the distance to the mark is measured and then, the motor position is set according to this distance. In other embodiments, a passive autofocus can be used where images taken at various motor positions are analyzed to find the best focus position. In this case, the real distance is not known, but the offset can still be computed using equations 2 and 3 above.

Referring now to FIG. 5, an example system for reading bar codes, QR codes, or other marks (which in this example, utilizes a motor driven autofocus system) is depicted in block diagram form. Operation of the system is controlled by a programmed processor 100 operating on instructions and data stored in non-volatile memory 104 or random access memory 108. Communication between the processor 100 and memories 104 and 108 as well as the other components of the system is carried out using one or more buses represented at 112.

In this example system, the decoder may be a hardware decoder module or may be software or firmware implemented or any combination thereof which in any case is represented by decoder 110.

In this example system, the image acquisition module 120 may also be hardware or software or firmware implemented or any combination thereof. Image acquisition module 120 operates in cooperation with a lens or lens system 124 through which light reflected from the mark is captured. The lens 124 is focused using an autofocus motor 128 that is responsive to an autofocus motor controller 132. Input from the user and output to the user is provided with a user interface 136 (Input/Output or I/O 136).

In operation, the image acquisition module 120 under control by the processor 100 provides a distance measurement to the mark which is to be imaged. The image acquisition module 120 then conveys through processor 100 instructions to the autofocus motor controller 132 that cause the autofocus motor controller 132 to position the motor 128 (and thus lens 124) at a distance that includes the calculated offset so as to provide for a merging of the peened dots. The image acquisition module 120 then captures an image of the mark and sends the image to memory where the image is accessed and decoded by decoder module 110. The input/output 132 can be used by the user in certain embodiments to control whether or not a dot peened image is to be acquired, and thus whether or not an offset is to be applied to the motor position.

An example process of operation of the system of FIG. 5 is depicted in flow chart form as FIG. 6 starting at 200. At 202, the image acquisition module measures a distance to the mark. At 206, the focus position (which in this example is a motor position) is calculated for the distance that has been measured so as to put the mark in focus.

At 210, the process determines whether or not the user has selected operation in the dot peen mode or not. If so, an offset is calculated at 214 and that offset is added to the focus position (motor position in this example) at 218. The autofocus system is then positioned at 222 to the offset focus position so as to cause the lens to be positioned with the offset thereby merging adjacent dots. The image is then acquired at 226 and the process is done at 230.

In the case where the system is not in the dot peen mode at 210, it is desired that no offset be applied. Hence, the offset value is set to zero at 234. This zero offset overrides any offset calculated at 214 and the motor position at 218 is the same as the motor position calculated at 206.

Those skilled in the art will also appreciate, upon considering the present teachings, that some auto focus systems do not use a motor (for example, a liquid lens autofocus system). However, the present teachings can also be applied to such a system by applying an offset to the focus position of any known autofocus system.

* * *

To supplement the present disclosure, this application incorporates entirely by reference the following commonly assigned patents, patent application publications, and patent applications:

• U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,832,725; 7,128,266; 7,159,783; 7,413,127; 7,726,575; 8,294,969; 8,317,105; 8,322,622; 8,366,005; 8,371,507; 8,376,233; 8,381,979; 8,390,909; 8,408,464; 8,408,468; 8,408,469; 8,424,768; 8,448,863; 8,457,013; 8,459,557; 8,469,272; 8,474,712; 8,479,992; 8,490,877; 8,517,271; 8,523,076; 8,528,818; 8,544,737; 8,548,242; 8,548,420; 8,550,335; 8,550,354; 8,550,357; 8,556,174; 8,556,176; 8,556,177; 8,559,767; 8,599,957; 8,561,895; 8,561,903; 8,561,905; 8,565,107; 8,571,307; 8,579,200; 8,583,924; 8,584,945; 8,587,595; 8,587,697; 8,588,869; 8,590,789; 8,596,539; 8,596,542; 8,596,543; 8,599,271; 8,599,957; 8,600,158; 8,600,167; 8,602,309; 8,608,053; 8,608,071; 8,611,309; 8,615,487; 8,616,454; 8,621,123; 8,622,303; 8,628,013; 8,628,015; 8,628,016; 8,629,926; 8,630,491; 8,635,309; 8,636,200; 8,636,212; 8,636,215; 8,636,224; 8,638,806; 8,640,958; 8,640,960; 8,643,717; 8,646,692; 8,646,694; 8,657,200; 8,659,397; 8,668,149; 8,678,285; 8,678,286; 8,682,077; 8,687,282; 8,692,927; 8,695,880; 8,698,949; 8,717,494; 8,717,494; 8,720,783; 8,723,804; 8,723,904; 8,727,223; D702,237; 8,740,082; 8,740,085; 8,746,563; 8,750,445; 8,752,766; 8,756,059; 8,757,495; 8,760,563; 8,763,909; 8,777,108; 8,777,109; 8,779,898; 8,781,520; 8,783,573; 8,789,757; 8,789,758; 8,789,759; 8,794,520; 8,794,522; 8,794,525; 8,794,526; 8,798,367; 8,807,431; 8,807,432; 8,820,630; 8,822,848; 8,824,692; 8,824,696; 8,842,849; 8,844,822; 8,844,823; 8,849,019; 8,851,383; 8,854,633; 8,866,963; 8,868,421; 8,868,519; 8,868,802; 8,868,803; 8,870,074; 8,879,639; 8,880,426; 8,881,983; 8,881,987; 8,903,172; 8,908,995; 8,910,870; 8,910,875; 8,914,290; 8,914,788; 8,915,439; 8,915,444; 8,916,789; 8,918,250; 8,918,564; 8,925,818; 8,939,374; 8,942,480; 8,944,313; 8,944,327; 8,944,332; 8,950,678; 8,967,468; 8,971,346; 8,976,030; 8,976,368; 8,978,981; 8,978,983; 8,978,984; 8,985,456; 8,985,457; 8,985,459; 8,985,461; 8,988,578; 8,988,590; 8,991,704; 8,996,194; 8,996,384; 9,002,641; 9,007,368; 9,010,641; 9,015,513; 9,016,576; 9,022,288; 9,030,964; 9,033,240; 9,033,242; 9,036,054; 9,037,344; 9,038,911; 9,038,915; 9,047,098; 9,047,359; 9,047,420; 9,047,525; 9,047,531; 9,053,055; 9,053,378; 9,053,380; 9,058,526; 9,064,165; 9,064,167; 9,064,168; 9,064,254; 9,066,032; 9,070,032;
• U.S. Design Pat. No. D716,285;
• U.S. Design Pat. No. D723,560;
• U.S. Design Pat. No. D730,357;
• U.S. Design Pat. No. D730,901;
• U.S. Design Pat. No. D730,902;
• U.S. Design Pat. No. D733,112;
• U.S. Design Pat. No. D734,339;
• International Publication No. 2013/163789;
• International Publication No. 2013/173985;
• International Publication No. 2014/019130;
• International Publication No. 2014/110495;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0185432;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0134221;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0177080;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0177076;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0177707;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0177749;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0265880;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0202554;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0111946;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0168511;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0168512;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0193423;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0203647;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0223141;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0228382;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0248188;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0043312;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0082104;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0175341;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0175343;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0257744;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0257759;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0270346;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0287258;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0292475;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0292477;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0293539;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0293540;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0306728;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0306731;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0307964;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0308625;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0313324;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0313325;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0342717;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0001267;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0008439;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0025584;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0034734;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0036848;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0039693;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0042814;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0049120;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0049635;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0061306;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0063289;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0066136;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0067692;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0070005;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0071840;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0074746;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0076974;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0078341;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0078345;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0097249;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0098792;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0100813;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0103115;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0104413;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0104414;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0104416;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0104451;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0106594;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0106725;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0108010;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0108402;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0110485;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0114530;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0124577;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0124579;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0125842;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0125853;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0125999;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0129378;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0131438;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0131441;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0131443;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0131444;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0131445;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0131448;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0133379;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0136208;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0140585;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0151453;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0152882;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0158770;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0159869;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0166755;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0166759;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0168787;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0175165;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0175172;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0191644;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0191913;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0197238;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0197239;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0197304;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0214631;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0217166;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0217180;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0231500;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0232930;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0247315;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0263493;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0263645;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0267609;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0270196;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0270229;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0278387;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0278391;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0282210;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0297058;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0299665;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0312121;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0319220;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0319221;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0326787;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0332590;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0344943;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0346233;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0351317;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0353373;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0361073;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0361082;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0362184;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0363015;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0369511;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0374483;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0374485;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0001301;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0001304;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0003673;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0009338;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0009610;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0014416;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0021397;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0028102;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0028103;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0028104;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0029002;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0032709;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0039309;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0039878;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0040378;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0048168;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0049347;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0051992;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0053766;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0053768;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0053769;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0060544;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0062366;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0063215;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0063676;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0069130;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0071819;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0083800;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0086114;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0088522;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0096872;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0099557;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0100196;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0102109;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0115035;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0127791;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0128116;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0129659;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0133047;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0134470;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0136851;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0136854;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0142492;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0144692;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0144698;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0144701;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0149946;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0161429;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0169925;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0169929;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0178523;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0178534;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0178535;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0178536;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0178537;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0181093;
• U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0181109;
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/367,978 for a Laser Scanning Module Employing an Elastomeric U-Hinge Based Laser Scanning Assembly, filed Feb. 7, 2012 (Feng et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/458,405 for an Electronic Device, filed Jun. 19, 2013 (Fitch et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/459,620 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (London et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/468,118 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Sep. 26, 2013 (Oberpriller et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/150,393 for Indicia-reader Having Unitary Construction Scanner, filed Jan. 8, 2014 (Colavito et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/200,405 for Indicia Reader for Size-Limited Applications filed Mar. 7, 2014 (Feng et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/231,898 for Hand-Mounted Indicia-Reading Device with Finger Motion Triggering filed Apr. 1, 2014 (Van Horn et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/486,759 for an Imaging Terminal, filed Apr. 2, 2014 (Oberpriller et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/257,364 for Docking System and Method Using Near Field Communication filed Apr. 21, 2014 (Showering);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/264,173 for Autofocus Lens System for Indicia Readers filed Apr. 29, 2014 (Ackley et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/277,337 for MULTIPURPOSE OPTICAL READER, filed May 14, 2014 (Jovanovski et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/283,282 for TERMINAL HAVING ILLUMINATION AND FOCUS CONTROL filed May 21, 2014 (Liu et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/327,827 for a MOBILE-PHONE ADAPTER FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS, filed Jul. 10, 2014 (Hejl);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/334,934 for a SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INDICIA VERIFICATION, filed Jul. 18, 2014 (Hejl);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/339,708 for LASER SCANNING CODE SYMBOL READING SYSTEM, filed Jul. 24, 2014 (Xian et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/340,627 for an AXIALLY REINFORCED FLEXIBLE SCAN ELEMENT, filed Jul. 25, 2014 (Rueblinger et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/446,391 for MULTIFUNCTION POINT OF SALE APPARATUS WITH OPTICAL SIGNATURE CAPTURE filed Jul. 30, 2014 (Good et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/452,697 for INTERACTIVE INDICIA READER, filed Aug. 6, 2014 (Todeschini);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/453,019 for DIMENSIONING SYSTEM WITH GUIDED ALIGNMENT, filed Aug. 6, 2014 (Li et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/462,801 for MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICE WITH DATA COGNITION SOFTWARE, filed on Aug. 19, 2014 (Todeschini et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/483,056 for VARIABLE DEPTH OF FIELD BARCODE SCANNER filed Sep. 10, 2014 (McCloskey et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/513,808 for IDENTIFYING INVENTORY ITEMS IN A STORAGE FACILITY filed Oct. 14, 2014 (Singel et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/519,195 for HANDHELD DIMENSIONING SYSTEM WITH FEEDBACK filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/519,179 for DIMENSIONING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPATH INTERFERENCE MITIGATION filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Thuries et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/519,211 for SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIMENSIONING filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/519,233 for HANDHELD DIMENSIONER WITH DATA-QUALITY INDICATION filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Laffargue et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/519,249 for HANDHELD DIMENSIONING SYSTEM WITH MEASUREMENT-CONFORMANCE FEEDBACK filed Oct. 21, 2014 (Ackley et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/527,191 for METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOGNIZING SPEECH USING WILDCARDS IN AN EXPECTED RESPONSE filed Oct. 29, 2014 (Braho et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/529,563 for ADAPTABLE INTERFACE FOR A MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICE filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Schoon et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/529,857 for BARCODE READER WITH SECURITY FEATURES filed Oct. 31, 2014 (Todeschini et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/398,542 for PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES HAVING A SEPARATE LOCATION TRIGGER UNIT FOR USE IN CONTROLLING AN APPLICATION UNIT filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Bian et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/531,154 for DIRECTING AN INSPECTOR THROUGH AN INSPECTION filed Nov. 3, 2014 (Miller et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/533,319 for BARCODE SCANNING SYSTEM USING WEARABLE DEVICE WITH EMBEDDED CAMERA filed Nov. 5, 2014 (Todeschini);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/535,764 for CONCATENATED EXPECTED RESPONSES FOR SPEECH RECOGNITION filed Nov. 7, 2014 (Braho et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/568,305 for AUTO-CONTRAST VIEWFINDER FOR AN INDICIA READER filed Dec. 12, 2014 (Todeschini);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/573,022 for DYNAMIC DIAGNOSTIC INDICATOR GENERATION filed Dec. 17, 2014 (Goldsmith);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/578,627 for SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD filed Dec. 22, 2014 (Ackley et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/580,262 for MEDIA GATE FOR THERMAL TRANSFER PRINTERS filed Dec. 23, 2014 (Bowles);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/590,024 for SHELVING AND PACKAGE LOCATING SYSTEMS FOR DELIVERY VEHICLES filed Jan. 6, 2015 (Payne);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/596,757 for SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING BARCODE PRINTING ERRORS filed Jan. 14, 2015 (Ackley);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/416,147 for OPTICAL READING APPARATUS HAVING VARIABLE SETTINGS filed Jan. 21, 2015 (Chen et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/614,706 for DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING AN ELECTRONIC TOOL ON A USER'S HAND filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/614,796 for CARGO APPORTIONMENT TECHNIQUES filed Feb. 5, 2015 (Morton et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/516,892 for TABLE COMPUTER filed Feb. 6, 2015 (Bidwell et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/619,093 for METHODS FOR TRAINING A SPEECH RECOGNITION SYSTEM filed Feb. 11, 2015 (Pecorari);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/628,708 for DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE STATUS OF CHECKOUT LANES filed Feb. 23, 2015 (Todeschini);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/630,841 for TERMINAL INCLUDING IMAGING ASSEMBLY filed Feb. 25, 2015 (Gomez et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/635,346 for SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RELIABLE STORE-AND-FORWARD DATA HANDLING BY ENCODED INFORMATION READING TERMINALS filed Mar. 2, 2015 (Sevier);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/519,017 for SCANNER filed Mar. 2, 2015 (Zhou et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/405,278 for DESIGN PATTERN FOR SECURE STORE filed Mar. 9, 2015 (Zhu et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/660,970 for DECODABLE INDICIA READING TERMINAL WITH COMBINED ILLUMINATION filed Mar. 18, 2015 (Kearney et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/661,013 for REPROGRAMMING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEVICES INCLUDING PROGRAMMING SYMBOL filed Mar. 18, 2015 (Soule et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/662,922 for MULTIFUNCTION POINT OF SALE SYSTEM filed Mar. 19, 2015 (Van Horn et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/663,638 for VEHICLE MOUNT COMPUTER WITH CONFIGURABLE IGNITION SWITCH BEHAVIOR filed Mar. 20, 2015 (Davis et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/664,063 for METHOD AND APPLICATION FOR SCANNING A BARCODE WITH A SMART DEVICE WHILE CONTINUOUSLY RUNNING AND DISPLAYING AN APPLICATION ON THE SMART DEVICE DISPLAY filed Mar. 20, 2015 (Todeschini);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/669,280 for TRANSFORMING COMPONENTS OF A WEB PAGE TO VOICE PROMPTS filed Mar. 26, 2015 (Funyak et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/674,329 for AIMER FOR BARCODE SCANNING filed Mar. 31, 2015 (Bidwell);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/676,109 for INDICIA READER filed Apr. 1, 2015 (Huck);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/676,327 for DEVICE MANAGEMENT PROXY FOR SECURE DEVICES filed Apr. 1, 2015 (Yeakley et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/676,898 for NAVIGATION SYSTEM CONFIGURED TO INTEGRATE MOTION SENSING DEVICE INPUTS filed Apr. 2, 2015 (Showering);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/679,275 for DIMENSIONING SYSTEM CALIBRATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS filed Apr. 6, 2015 (Laffargue et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/523,098 for HANDLE FOR A TABLET COMPUTER filed Apr. 7, 2015 (Bidwell et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/682,615 for SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR POWER MANAGEMENT OF MOBILE DEVICES filed Apr. 9, 2015 (Murawski et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/686,822 for MULTIPLE PLATFORM SUPPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD filed Apr. 15, 2015 (Qu et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/687,289 for SYSTEM FOR COMMUNICATION VIA A PERIPHERAL HUB filed Apr. 15, 2015 (Kohtz et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/524,186 for SCANNER filed Apr. 17, 2015 (Zhou et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/695,364 for MEDICATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Sewell et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/695,923 for SECURE UNATTENDED NETWORK AUTHENTICATION filed Apr. 24, 2015 (Kubler et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/525,068 for TABLET COMPUTER WITH REMOVABLE SCANNING DEVICE filed Apr. 27, 2015 (Schulte et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/699,436 for SYMBOL READING SYSTEM HAVING PREDICTIVE DIAGNOSTICS filed Apr. 29, 2015 (Nahill et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/702,110 for SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REGULATING BARCODE DATA INJECTION INTO A RUNNING APPLICATION ON A SMART DEVICE filed May 1, 2015 (Todeschini et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/702,979 for TRACKING BATTERY CONDITIONS filed May 4, 2015 (Young et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/704,050 for INTERMEDIATE LINEAR POSITIONING filed May 5, 2015 (Charpentier et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/705,012 for HANDS-FREE HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE RESPONSIVE TO A DRIVER OF A VEHICLE filed May 6, 2015 (Fitch et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/705,407 for METHOD AND SYSTEM TO PROTECT SOFTWARE-BASED NETWORK-CONNECTED DEVICES FROM ADVANCED PERSISTENT THREAT filed May 6, 2015 (Hussey et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/707,037 for SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISPLAY OF INFORMATION USING A VEHICLE-MOUNT COMPUTER filed May 8, 2015 (Chamberlin);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/707,123 for APPLICATION INDEPENDENT DEX/UCS INTERFACE filed May 8, 2015 (Pape);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/707,492 for METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR READING OPTICAL INDICIA USING A PLURALITY OF DATA SOURCES filed May 8, 2015 (Smith et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/710,666 for PRE-PAID USAGE SYSTEM FOR ENCODED INFORMATION READING TERMINALS filed May 13, 2015 (Smith);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/526,918 for CHARGING BASE filed May 14, 2015 (Fitch et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/715,672 for AUGUMENTED REALITY ENABLED HAZARD DISPLAY filed May 19, 2015 (Venkatesha et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/715,916 for EVALUATING IMAGE VALUES filed May 19, 2015 (Ackley);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/722,608 for INTERACTIVE USER INTERFACE FOR CAPTURING A DOCUMENT IN AN IMAGE SIGNAL filed May 27, 2015 (Showering et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/528,165 for IN-COUNTER BARCODE SCANNER filed May 27, 2015 (Oberpriller et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/724,134 for ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH WIRELESS PATH SELECTION CAPABILITY filed May 28, 2015 (Wang et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/724,849 for METHOD OF PROGRAMMING THE DEFAULT CABLE INTERFACE SOFTWARE IN AN INDICIA READING DEVICE filed May 29, 2015 (Barten);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/724,908 for IMAGING APPARATUS HAVING IMAGING ASSEMBLY filed May 29, 2015 (Barber et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/725,352 for APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING ONE OR MORE PORTABLE DATA TERMINALS (Caballero et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/528,590 for ELECTRONIC DEVICE filed May 29, 2015 (Fitch et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/528,890 for MOBILE COMPUTER HOUSING filed Jun. 2, 2015 (Fitch et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/728,397 for DEVICE MANAGEMENT USING VIRTUAL INTERFACES CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS filed Jun. 2, 2015 (Caballero);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/732,870 for DATA COLLECTION MODULE AND SYSTEM filed Jun. 8, 2015 (Powilleit);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/529,441 for INDICIA READING DEVICE filed Jun. 8, 2015 (Zhou et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/735,717 for INDICIA-READING SYSTEMS HAVING AN INTERFACE WITH A USER'S NERVOUS SYSTEM filed Jun. 10, 2015 (Todeschini);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/738,038 for METHOD OF AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING OBJECT WEIGHING INTERFERENCES filed Jun. 12, 2015 (Amundsen et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/740,320 for TACTILE SWITCH FOR A MOBILE ELECTRONIC DEVICE filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Bandringa);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/740,373 for CALIBRATING A VOLUME DIMENSIONER filed Jun. 16, 2015 (Ackley et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/742,818 for INDICIA READING SYSTEM EMPLOYING DIGITAL GAIN CONTROL filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Xian et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/743,257 for WIRELESS MESH POINT PORTABLE DATA TERMINAL filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Wang et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 29/530,600 for CYCLONE filed Jun. 18, 2015 (Vargo et al);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/744,633 for IMAGING APPARATUS COMPRISING IMAGE SENSOR ARRAY HAVING SHARED GLOBAL SHUTTER CIRCUITRY filed Jun. 19, 2015 (Wang);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/744,836 for CLOUD-BASED SYSTEM FOR READING OF DECODABLE INDICIA filed Jun. 19, 2015 (Todeschini et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/745,006 for SELECTIVE OUTPUT OF DECODED MESSAGE DATA filed Jun. 19, 2015 (Todeschini et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/747,197 for OPTICAL PATTERN PROJECTOR filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Thuries et al.);
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/747,490 for DUAL-PROJECTOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL SCANNER filed Jun. 23, 2015 (Jovanovski et al.); and
• U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/748,446 for CORDLESS INDICIA READER WITH A MULTIFUNCTION COIL FOR WIRELESS CHARGING AND EAS DEACTIVATION, filed Jun. 24, 2015 (Xie et al.).

* * *

In the specification and/or figures, certain embodiments of the invention have been disclosed. The present invention is not limited to such exemplary embodiments. The use of the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The figures are schematic representations and so are not necessarily drawn to scale. Unless otherwise noted, specific terms have been used in a generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.

Claims

1. A method, comprising: measuring a distance from a lens to a mark;calculating a focus position for an autofocus system that focuses the lens on the mark;determining whether the mark is a dot peen mark or not; andif the mark is a dot peen mark: applying an offset to the calculated focus position to produce an offset focus position;setting the autofocus system to the offset focus position;acquiring an image of the mark with the autofocus system set to the offset focus position; anddecoding the mark with a decoder using the acquired image of the mark.

2. The method according to claim 1, comprising selecting by a user between at least one of: dot peen mark reading mode and non-dot peen mark reading mode.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the decoding comprises utilizing a conventional decoder used to decode a non-dot peen mark.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the decoding comprises utilizing a specialized decoder optimized to read dot peen marks.

5. The method according to claim 1, comprising determining the offset prior to applying the offset.

6. The method according to claim 1, comprising determining the offset by adding offset values incrementally to the calculated focus position until space between dots in the image of the mark are merged in the acquired image.

7. The method according to claim 1, comprising determining the offset by reference to stored values.

8. The method according to claim 1, comprising determining the offset based on one or more of: a distance between dots of the mark, the distance from the lens to the mark, and a focus position.

9. A mark reader apparatus, comprising: a lens;an autofocus system that manipulates the lens in accordance with control signals;an image acquisition system that measures a distance from the lens to a mark; anda processor that is programmed to: calculate a focus position for an autofocus system that focuses the lens on the mark; andfunction in a dot peen decode mode and a non-dot peen decode mode;wherein in the dot peen decode mode, the processor is programmed to: apply an offset to the calculated focus position to produce an offset focus position;position the autofocus system to the offset focus position; andacquire an image of the mark with the autofocus system set to the offset focus position;wherein in the non-dot peen decode mode, the processor is programmed to: apply an offset setting of zero to the calculated focus position to produce an offset focus position;acquire an image of the mark with the autofocus system set to the offset setting of zero; anddecode the mark at a decoder by using the acquired image of the mark.

10. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the decoder used in the non-dot peen decode mode is the same as a decoder used in the dot peen decode mode.

11. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the processor is programmed to receive a selection by a user between at least one of: dot peen decode mode and non-dot peen decode mode.

12. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein decoding comprises utilizing a conventional decoder used to decode a non-dot peen mark.

13. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein decoding comprises utilizing a specialized decoder optimized to read dot peen marks.

14. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the processor is programmed to determine the offset prior to applying the offset.

15. The apparatus according to claim 9, comprising determining the offset by adding, by the processor, offset values incrementally to the calculated focus position until space between dots in the image of the mark are merged in the acquired image.

16. The apparatus according to claim 9, comprising determining the offset by reference to stored values.

17. The apparatus according to claim 9, comprising determining the offset by: calculating an empirical constant, wherein the empirical constant is dependent upon an autofocus mechanism and the lens; andcalculating the offset based on one or more of: a distance between dots of the mark, the distance from the lens to the mark, and a focus position.