Prior-art systems use RF tags that can be subjected to any Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) risk to hearing aid wearers, pacemakers, or IDC patients and had problems with Electromagnetic Compatibility worldwide.
Prior-art systems always had bandwidth as an issue. Prior-art systems also had high cost, low client count, short battery life and can only function in mild environment (away from steel and water). Many cost-sensitive, power “limited” applications exist (e.g., most industrial visibility networks) that may not require bandwidth, yet do require real-time, peer-to-peer networking with extended battery life.
The purpose for the below-described preferred embodiment to address above-listed problems within a long-wavelength network.
The Visibility Network is designed to provide real-time web enabled asset visibility. The RuBee IV protocol was designed to work reliably in a local visibility network and provide real-time visibility for assets, people, and livestock, pedigree and provide chain of possession events.
RuBee works over a controlled-range, wide area (1′×1′ to 100′×100′) in harsh environments (that is, near metals, liquids and through earth), with an extended battery life (10-15 years), and a high safety standard. The network's design goal was to create a low cost two-way radio tag that is safe for use in hospital patient-based settings, hospital operating rooms, airports and other public facilities. RuBee could not accept any Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) risk to hearing aid wearers, pacemaker, or IDC patients and has no known or Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) issues worldwide. Yet, RuBee provides range and the reliability needed to produce a real-time visibility network. Every radio tag attached to an asset appears to be a mini-web asset server within the Visibility Network. The Long Wavelength ID (LWID) tag has an antenna operable at a low radio frequency not exceeding 1 megahertz The tag also has a radiating transceiver operatively connected to said antenna, the transceiver operates to transmit and receive data at low radio frequency. The tag also has a programmed data processor to process data received from the transceiver. The data processor usually is a low cost 4-bit processor capable of encrypting and decrypting and complex functions associated with managing IP addresses. The tag associated with a first IP address. The tag has a volatile memory that stores said IP address. The transceiver emits an identification signal based upon said IP address stored in the volatile memory. The tag also has an energy source used for activating the transceiver and the data processor. Any RuBee IV tag if enabled properly may be searched and discovered on Google or the VAI “Dot-Tag” network.
The local network of tags talks to a RuBee Router (Sidewinder). The Sidewinder manages the local tag net in real time in much the same way any WiFi router manages a TCP/IP network. The Sidewinder communicates by a VPN to a data server which manages a PostgresSQL database of virtual tags (the Dot-Tag Visibility Data Server).
Long wavelength, produces little, if any energy dissipated in the form of an electrical field (E). Long wavelength transmissions radiate energy (99.99%) in the form of a magnetic field (H). The RuBee radio tags are inductive tags and typically need a minimum signal of 0.1 milligauss to a maximum of about 300 milligauss for reliable communication. The strongest field near or on top of a base station antenna can be about 1200 milligauss, however most standard antennas are in the 100-300 milligauss range. To help provide some context for these values, the earth's magnetic field is 300-600 milligauss.
The systems are installed in several major retailers as in-store inventory visible systems, in hospitals to provide medical device visibility, other healthcare applications providing real time inventory visibility on high valued products throughout distribution, in agricultural applications providing visibility and age verification for cattle, and in other industries providing identity systems and visibility systems for patients, physicians, policemen, firemen, correctional officers and corporate employees.
The advantage of this system low cost to clients, low cost base stations and routers, long battery life tags, high client/tag counts within a single network, and work in harsh environments (near steel and water).
The VTDB 305 is shared by many Sidewinders 302 within a Visibility Network 100 but effectively produces a PostgresSQL database that represents the tag, its data and reads over last human legible, comma separated, date time-stamped record of every tag transaction. It provides a total RuBee network history of critical evens including signal, errors, rereads, CRC checks and can be used for audits or for network statistics. Sidewinders 302 spool approximately 24 hours of tag data in a local database, providing protection and backup if any Network outages occur over the VPN 303.
Current RuBee Networks 301 use a protocol known as RuBee IV, and consume only a few microamps in standby and less than 1 milliamp in active mode. RuBee tag 301a may be fully programmable using low cost 4-bit processors 403 capable of encryption and decryption and complex functions associated with managing IP addresses (DCHP, ARP). RuBee tag 301a is remotely driven form the standby mode to active mode the sidewinder 302.
RuBee Networks 301, offer the advantage of low cost tags and low cost base stations (<$100). Moreover, because RuBee tag 301a have the power source 408, they may optionally be equipped with sensors 401, sRAM 404, displays 409, LEDs 402 and may also be low in cost (<$2 per tag). Some Rubee protocol designs also eliminate the battery and cost about 15 cents with a reduced range. Networks of thousands of peer-to-peer RuBee tags work reliably as a visibility network. RuBee tags are not affected by liquids, can be used underwater or as an implantable device, and are minimally affected by steel.
The base station apparatus employed may be that disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/462,981 filed Aug. 7, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. The tags employed can be those described in US 2007/0115132, published May 24, 2007, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. The RF technology can be that described in US 2007/0063895, published Mar. 22, 2007, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. The tag technology can be that described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,049,963, issued May 23, 2006, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. The transceiver communicating with the tags can be that described in US 2007/0120649, published May 31, 2007, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
RuBee industrial visibility networks may be used to provide visibility on or near steel shelves and in harsh environments such as operating theaters (rooms), oil and chemical plants, warehouses and retail stores. Long wavelength, low bandwidth visibility systems and sensor networks are currently in use at industrial installations.
The tools 501 produce a data log consistent with Part11 logs and represent the supreme check on network and tag integrity.
Part11 data 602 may be encrypted using Tools Data Desk 601 and emailed to a subscriber every hour day or week, and will identify and diagnose tag, antenna or network problems before they happen. Statistics of reads and read errors for individual tags or millions of tags may be routinely viewed in a few seconds shown in Tables 604, 605 and 606. This data is written with an independently verified date time stamp to a WORM optical disk drive 603 to create an audit trail that meets 21CFRPart11 for all tag transactions. The Part11 audit trails also meet SEC Rule 17a-4, HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), and DoD 5015.2 standards.
SOX data 701 may be encrypted using Tools Data Desk 601 and emailed to a subscriber day, week, or month and will identify and diagnose product inventory delivery problems before they happen. Statistics of product movement for individual items or millions of items may be routinely viewed in a few seconds. This data is written with an independently verified date time stamp to a WORM optical disk drive 603 to create an audit trail that meets SEC rules for all product transactions.
The Air Traffic Control (ATC) ATC plug 805 is used to control functions within a RuBee network 301. For example to turn on a LED 402 on a tag the tag is accessed using a simple instruction with flash time etc through the ATC plug 805. The read times for tags, router start stop times, and antenna tune checks etc. are all controlled through the ATC plug 805. The SQL plug 804 is used to support a data requests. Real-time visibility reports are shown in Table 808.
The user ERP's 806 are also responsible for exports to a customer system 809. For example business rules linked to a billing event and all information tied to that are exported in Layer 6. The layer 6 includes a User Event Export Tools 807 that covert a real-time visibility reports into report that fits a specific event like billing. Examples of User Event Export Tools 807 are Excel, CSV, HL7 and XML-RDF.
RuBee Network 301 activated smart shelves 1001 has been placed as a network in Hospitals. Orthopedic implants have tags placed on outside of box. Note these devices are steel and are packaged with heavy aluminum sealed packages and stacked on steel shelves. The Part11 data 602 and tools shows 24 hours of reads (26,391 per day) and shows that 99.765% or 26,329 reads are 100% on first attempt. 0.129 were successful on second attempt and so on for 100% reads up to five attempts. Local noise, and individual moving or searching for a box etc. May lead to re-reads as shown in the Table 1102.
Tables 1301 and 1302 are examples of a real time access to the inventory of the shelf 1001. It also provided point of use data, usage statistics, and needs predictions.
It will thus be appreciated that the above discussion enables one to provide a system comprising:
The server can be a user web-based ERP, the server providing real-time visibility reports. 8. The user web-based ERP may be selected from the set consisting of Eclipse, Pentaho, Ruby on Rails, Google tools, Java, .Net and Weblogic.
At least one of the long-wavelength tags can include a sensor or a Light Emitting Diode (LED).
The server can create and preserve a Part11 human-legible record of tag transactions. The Part11 human legible records can include tag signal strength, tag field boundaries, CRC confidence checks, statistics on said tag, failed reads, packet relays, noise levels, and the tag data.
The server can create and preserve a Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) archive, said SOX archive providing a human-legible total asset network history of critical events including time off shelf, when removed, physical inventory, date sold, reorder thresholds, and billing information.
The system can further comprise a tool for data export from the server, said tool selected from the set consisting of Excel, CSV, HL7 and XML-RDF.
The IP address of a tag may be stored within the tag, for example in a nonvolatile memory. In such a case, the router learns the IP address by interrogating the tag.
On the other hand, the tag may simply have a unique hardware address, and the assignment of an IP address to the tag can take place in the router (the sidewinder). In such a case, router maintains within the router a correspondence between the assigned IP address and the hardware address of the tag.
The router may power the tag by bathing the tag in an RF energy field.
It should be noted that the matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings should be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limited sense. The following claims are intended to cover all generic and specific features described herein, as well as all statements of the scope of the present method and system, which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall there between.
This application claims is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/764,360, filed Jun. 18, 2007, now abandoned, which claims priority from U.S. application No. 60/805,020 filed Jun. 16, 2006, which application is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6681198 | Buote et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6901304 | Swan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7414571 | Schantz et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20030155415 | Markham et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040064382 | Negron | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040199543 | Braud et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040222889 | Hoshina et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050199716 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060020499 | Aitipamula et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047787 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100322168 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60805020 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11764360 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12705115 | US |