The present invention relates to a system for packaging articles, particularly loaves of bread and, more particularly, “high end” or premium breads which heretofore have been first wrapped by an automatic wrapping machine and thereafter bagged by an automatic bagging machine.
Automatic wrapping machines for bread have been known for a long time. An example is a wrapping machine of the general type described in Jensen et al. U.S. Pat. No. 2,691,856, assigned to American Machine & Foundry Co. (“AMF”) and the patents referred to therein and other patents of AMF. In such a machine, an individual loaf to be wrapped is moved transversely of its length against a draped or depending leading or free end of a continuous wrapper web as the loaf travels from an infeed conveyor. The web is fed from a roll. In early machines, the wrapping material web consisted of waxed paper, whereas later machines were converted to use cellophane and, still later, polypropylene. The wrapping sequence is essentially the same regardless of the wrap material used. Typically, the wrapper web material is drawn over the top of the loaf and down along the rear side under a desired amount of tension. The loaf and wrapper web are manipulated to form a lap joint on the underside. The web then is cut and the loaf delivered to a heated platen for heat sealing the lap joint. The ends of the wrap are tucked or folded and sealed to complete the wrap.
As compared to the older wrapping equipment, more modern automatic bagging machines use stacks of preformed bags stored on wickets. An individual bag is opened to receive a loaf fed lengthwise into the bag, and the bag can be closed by a twist tie or clip.
The more modern bagging machines are of less complicated construction and more reliable than the older wrapping machines. Also, there is less likelihood that the bag will come open during shipping and handling, i.e., before taken home by the customer. The bagging machines also are adaptable to different articles. Consequently, automatic bagging machines continue to be sold and improved, whereas new wrapping machines have not been sold for quite some time.
For “high end” or “premium” breads, it has become common to use the older wrapping machines to form an inner wrap for a tighter, neater and more consistently shaped package which then is bagged by an automatic bagging machine. Still, the older wrapping machines have the undesirable characteristics of being complicated and less reliable, and parts have become scarce and expensive. Further, the inner wrap may loosen so that a customer opening the outer bag may suspect tampering or an inadequate inner wrap.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a system for a double package for high end or premium bread, including pre-sliced loaves, having a tight, neat inner package and an outer bag. The inner package preferably is formed by a bagging operation using modern bagging equipment, as compared to the known inner wrapped package. In the present invention, this can be achieved by initially bagging the bread in a preformed bag which then has its open end gathered and heat sealed. Thereafter the sealed bag is heat shrunk, but only to the degree necessary to create a reasonably tight, neat package. Preferably the closed end of the heat shrinkable bag is gusseted for an attractive appearance. Thereafter, the bagged product is fed to an automatic bagging machine to apply a looser outer bag and, from there, to an automatic bag closer such as a twist tie or clip applying machine.
In another aspect of the present invention, the closed end of the inner bag has perforations for easy opening by the customer and also to provide a tamper evident package.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present invention can be practiced using largely conventional components to achieve a novel and unobvious result. In general, the preferred embodiment of the invention pertains to automatic packaging of loaves of bread, particularly “high end” or “premium” breads. An example of a layout of the components is shown in FIG. 1.
First, loaves of bread to be packaged are fed to a slicing machine 12. An example of such a slicing machine is the model 9075 slicer available from United Bakery Equipment (UBE) of Compton, Calif. At this stage, the sliced bread loaf L can be diagrammatically illustrated as shown in
The sliced loaf is transported by an exit conveyor 14 to the transfer mechanism 16 of an automatic bagging machine 18, such as a model JV60 or GT4 horizontal bagger available from Formost Packaging Machines, Inc., of Woodinville, Wash. Such a horizontal bagger has a stack of preformed, wicketed bags 20 which are filled consecutively in conjunction with the automatic bag opening and product inserting mechanism.
At this stage, the product can be represented as illustrated in FIG. 2B. The loaf L is contained within a preformed bag 20 having a closed end 22 and an open end 24. Returning to
In a representative embodiment, the bag sealing head includes mechanism for gathering the open end of the bag, and to seal and trim the newly closed end of the bag. A representative sealing head is the model HCBS available from All Packaging Machinery (APM) of Ronkonkona, N.Y. At this stage, the bagged product can be represented as shown in
Next, the loosely bagged product is conveyed through a shrink tunnel 32, such as the model 7141 available from Weldotron Company of Piscotaway, N.J., or the model T-62 available from Shaklin Company of Ayer, Mass. As described in more detail below, heat shrinks the bag to a fairly tight condition as represented in FIG. 2D. The relative sizes of the bread loaf L, bag 20, and the characteristics of the inner bag material are selected to achieve the desired fit. At this stage the preformed closed end 22 of the bag will retain a neater appearance than the gathered and sealed end of the bag 24.
From the shrink tunnel 32, the loaf is fed to a 180° turn conveyor 34 onto another infeed conveyor 36 which can, for example, be a driven free roller conveyor. Turning the bagged product results in the newly-formed end being presented first to a second automatic bagging machine 38 such as a Model JV60 or GT4 Formost horizontal bagger. Such horizontal bagger has a stack of preformed bags 40 which are filled consecutively by the incoming inner bagged loaves, i.e., bagger 38 runs on demand. The heat shrunk inner bag and enclosed loaf are inserted through the open end of the outer bag, by movement of the loaf or the outer bag, depending on the particular bagger used. At the exit end of the bagger 38, the now double-bagged product can be represented as shown in
Finally, an exit conveyor 44 conveys the double-bagged product to automatic closing equipment 46 for the outer bag, such as a twist tier (such as a model 2000 or 2100 available from Burford Company of Maysville, Okla.), or clip applying machine (such as the model 872B available from Kwik Lok Company of Yakima, Wash.), or other conventional bag closing apparatus, resulting in the double bagged condition of FIG. 2F.
As emphasized above, a neat appearing inner bag is considered to be important.
In addition, the closed end 22 of each bag 20 can be formed with a horizontal row of perforations 60 which will be in the end of the inner bag presented to the consumer when the outer bag is opened. Such perforations can be formed in a continuous row along the gusseted portion of the bag web material as illustrated in FIG. 3. Alternatively, a shorter row of perforations can be provided, spaced uniformly along the length of the bag web so as to be approximately centered in the gusseted end of each finished bag.
More specifically, the bag end 22 can appear as shown in FIG. 4A and
Conventional materials deliberately designed for heat shrinking may stretch unduly, or be too weak for achieving the tight, neat package desired, or shrink too tightly and deform some or all of the loaves. In the currently preferred embodiment, the preferred material for the inner bag is a low density polyethylene (PE) with or without ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) additive, but another possibility is a polyolefin bag. The material and characteristics of the shrink tunnel must be selected with the intended use in mind. For example, typically the sliced bread would be delivered at a temperature between about 95° and 115° F. and it is preferred that additional heat supplied during the inner bagging and bag shrinking operation not be excessive. In the currently preferred embodiment, the PE inner bag is shrunk in a shrink tunnel approximately 93 inches long at a temperature of about 400° F. for a period of about 3 to 4 seconds, but even these characteristics are dependent on the looseness of the fit of the loaf in the unshrunk bags 20. For example, in the currently preferred embodiment the circumference of the bag exceeds the circumference of the loaf by about 1 inch to 2 inches prior to shrinkage, which has been found to accommodate expected variations in the incoming bread loaf size and still achieve a reasonably tight, neat fit for the inner bag. After shrinkage of the inner bag it is preferred that the circumference of the bag exceed the circumference of the loaf by no more than about one-quarter inch to one-half inch. A looser fit initially will mandate a greater degree of shrinkage to achieve an equivalent inner package.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2132144 | Blum | Oct 1938 | A |
2304048 | Jensen | Dec 1942 | A |
2320362 | Jensen | Jun 1943 | A |
2366888 | Werden et al. | Jan 1945 | A |
2367160 | Werden et al. | Jan 1945 | A |
2385706 | Jensen | Sep 1945 | A |
2391316 | Jensen | Dec 1945 | A |
2676445 | Kottmann | Apr 1954 | A |
2676692 | Bauer | Apr 1954 | A |
2691856 | Jensen et al. | Oct 1954 | A |
2697474 | McGinley | Dec 1954 | A |
2736421 | Bell | Feb 1956 | A |
2747349 | Kottmann | May 1956 | A |
2817933 | Bell et al. | Dec 1957 | A |
2844242 | Panuline | Jul 1958 | A |
2848224 | Jensen | Aug 1958 | A |
2860469 | Bell | Nov 1958 | A |
2887212 | Waite | May 1959 | A |
2926472 | Waite | Mar 1960 | A |
3092502 | Smith | Jun 1963 | A |
3132028 | Austin et al. | May 1964 | A |
3428240 | Morris | Feb 1969 | A |
3504784 | Noyes | Apr 1970 | A |
3508379 | Noyes et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3527337 | Formo | Sep 1970 | A |
3590553 | Formo | Jul 1971 | A |
3868807 | Noyes et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3914917 | Young | Oct 1975 | A |
3930352 | Carnes | Jan 1976 | A |
5741075 | Collins et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9344229 | Feb 1994 | AU |
9642135 | Aug 1996 | AU |
1152281 | May 1969 | GB |
2331059 | May 1999 | GB |
2350103 | Nov 2000 | GB |
243745 | Aug 1996 | NZ |
270385 | Aug 1998 | NZ |