The present invention pertains to a “Double cap system for the handling and transfer of hazardous materials” between two vessels, for radioactive or toxic materials, or for materials containing pathogenic microorganisms. This system comprises a particular metal-metal contact sealing between a cap and a flange of a first vessel or a water-tight compartment, and a cap and flanges of a second vessel, the latter being a 200-liter standardized vessel or barrel.
The aim of the double cap systems is to prevent, during the transfer of some hazardous materials between two vessels, any leakage to the atmosphere or the environment surrounding such vessels. For that reason, the caps of both vessels are coupled, leaving external surfaces facing each other and making up the “double cap” as used herein. Subsequently, said double cap or coupled caps are opened by means of an opening/closing electropneumatic mechanism, located within one of the vessels, which places the double cap apart from the hazardous materials transfer opening.
Once the double cap is removed, the vessels remain connected through their openings and the transfer between vessels can be carried out in the direction needed. Once said hazardous material is transferred between vessels, the opening/closing electropneumatic mechanism places the double cap back to where it was removed from, and the two caps thereof are then uncoupled so that each cap is placed in its respective vessel.
As shown herein, when this procedure is carried out, the external surfaces of the caps, or surfaces in contact with the environment, do not get polluted thanks to their mutual hermetic coupling, in spite of having remained in one of the vessels.
In addition, there will not be any leakage in the coupling of the vessels either, that is to say, in the loading and unloading opening of the material to be transferred.
These double cap systems are preferably applied to the transfer of material from a waste container or barrel to a water-tight compartment, such as a glove box or a waste treatment cell, or vice versa.
To ensure total security in the procedure, certain operations must be performed in the correct order, for example, the door to the water-tight compartment or cell must not be opened until the second vessel has been coupled, or until both caps have been coupled to each other.
With reference to the prior art of the present invention, double cap systems are known, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,857,308 (AEA TECHNOLOGY PLC) dated Jan. 12, 1999, GB 2,330,549 (KARLSRUHE FORSCHZENT) dated Apr. 28, 1999, DE 1954811.8 (KARLSRUHE FORSCHZENT-DE) Jun. 26, 1997, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,580,694 (KERNFORSCHUNGSZ KARLSRUHE-DE) dated Apr. 8, 1986. The disadvantage of these systems over the present invention lies in the use of a sealing method consisting solely of a rubber joint with no metal-metal contact, which means that, in case the joint gets damaged by aging, chemical reaction with a material or fire, stagnation is lost and the material contained is released to the atmosphere or environment.
The double cap of the invention has a sealing by metal—metal contact with rubber gaskets. It utilizes two square gaskets of equal sections and dimensions, of microalveolar or closed cell rubber, arranged in such a way that they touch only in their edges of one of its apices.
Consequently, it presents the advantage of a simple cross section of the gaskets, the sealing is achieved by compression since microalveolar rubber is utilized, and it allows the absorption of disalignments between the flanges, without loosing hermeticism, and with less quality requirements in the mechanization. The location of the gaskets in the flanges and doors are built with two retention wings in order to fix the gaskets in their_position without the need to use adhesives and therefore allowing an easy maintenance or replacement of the gaskets without the necessity of removing or opening the doors.
Neither of the patents above mentioned provide a solution to the problem of sealing in a simple and safe way, which is achieved in the present invention through a metal-metal contact which is coupled with two gaskets of square sections and they are placed face to face by the edges of one of its apices of the section, minimizing in that way the possible polluted area.
Another characteristic of the double cap of the invention is the doors lock, which consists of a minimum of three bolts which allows to play the double function of unlocking the drum cap and, at the same time, of coupling both caps hermetically. Consequently, in general this system is simpler than the systems mentioned in the prior art.
Another disadvantage of the previous art systems is that a special vessel or barrel must be used, as well as complex, specifically designed rubber gaskets, so no other container can be used. Moreover, the simple manufacture square-section gasket used herein results in lower system production costs.
Furthermore, in the systems of the prior art, the rubber gasket is stressed by weight, unlike the system of the present invention wherein the gasket is only stressed by weight when the caps are coupled.
The double cap of the present invention overcomes the problems and/or drawbacks of the systems of the prior art by means of a particular structure of the water-tight compartment, vessel or barrel caps and flanges thereof, which enables the formation of metal-metal seals which are complemented with microalveolar or closed cell rubber gaskets with simple shape and with lineal contact between them, preventing leakages to the outside, even when the rubber gaskets are subject to poor use conditions.
The two gaskets of square sections of microalveolar rubber confronted by one of their edges, minimize the possible pollution area. This is possible thanks to its capacity to present differences regarding flatness and because of its design and disposition.
The placements of the gaskets in the flanges and door cap are designed with two retention wings that fix the gaskets in their position, avoiding the use of other fixing methods like adhesives. This method allows to make the maintenance or replacement of the gaskets easier without the need to retire or open the caps.
The use of flanges applied to the vessel or barrel enables the use of other types of barrels and only the flange that adapts to each type needs to be changed.
There is also electro pneumatic activation with a pneumatic piston for the opening and closing of the double cap which is monitored by sensors associated to electronic logic, so as to ensure the correct operation sequence of the pneumatic actuators, preventing the compartment cap from opening when the container is uncoupled and thus from polluting the environment.
One of the main objectives of the present invention is to ensure water-tight sealing during the handling and transfer of hazardous materials and to ensure long-lasting elements, preventing its watertight nature from being damaged by aging.
The second objective of the present invention is to achieve the water-tight sealing of each one of the caps once they are placed in the corresponding containers.
The third objective of the double cap system is to facilitate the use of any container suitable for the handling and transfer of hazardous materials by means of the coupling of flanges, which shall be compatible with the water-tight compartment cap the material transfer is performed with.
A particular application of the present invention is the handling and transfer of hazardous materials such as radioactive or toxic materials or pathogenic microorganisms.
To achieve a better understanding of the present invention and its advantages, below is a detailed description of a preferred example of the formulation of the double cap presented herein, based on the attached drawings, wherein:
In the figures listed above, equal or equivalent components of the example of the invention execution correspond to equal reference numbers.
As shown in
In addition, there shall be a metal-metal sealing between the lower surface (22) of flange 3, and the upper outer surface (22′) of flange 1a of the container or barrel “a”; and between the container or barrel cap (23′) and the upper inner surface (23) of flange 1a.
It is also observed in
Also,
The barrel flange 1a and the cell or water-tight compartment cap 4 have microalveolar rubber gaskets housing 5 and 6, preferably square section, in order to achieve a hermetic seal among cap 4, water-tight compartment flange 3 and cap 2, and among barrel flange 1a, water-tight compartment flange 3 and container or barrel cap 2.
As shown in
The designs known in the prior art use rubber gaskets placed directly over the specially designed barrel, which consequently has the same diameter, and cannot be used with other containers. The container or barrel flange structures presented herein enable a safe transfer of hazardous materials without the need of special containers, so that standardized 200-liter barrels can be used for storing radioactive or dangerous waste.
The operation sequence of the double cap system is as follows:
Elevation of barrel “a” comprising flanges 1a and 1b, under the set of gate or cap 4 of the water-tight compartment or waste cell “b” comprising flange “3”;
Positioning of barrel “a” in flange 3 of the water-tight compartment or waste cell so that the lower part of rubber seal 5 placed on cap 4 of the compartment lies properly on the corresponding wedge of cap 2 of container or barrel “a”.
Coupling, by means of internal mechanisms of the water-tight compartment, of cap 4 to cap 2 of container or barrel “a” (segments 14 of cap mechanism 4 lock to wheels 15. When such segments are moved towards the center, cap 2 is opened and coupled to cap 4).
Elevation, with the subsequent opening of the double cap and free access to the inside of the barrel, for loading or unloading.
In the preferred embodiment, cap 2 of barrel “a” locks onto the barrel by means of six bolts (7) with springs (8) which, at the time of closing cap 2, are inserted in a notch existing on flange 1a of barrel “a”.
Bolts 7 are tightened onto cap 2 by means of a thread in the locking die (9). Three retainers (10) are used to seal the bolt outlet hole.
Once cap 2 of the barrel and barrel “a” itself have been coupled to flange 3 of the water-tight compartment, cap 2 of the barrel must be unlocked to be coupled to cap 4 of the water-tight compartment, and thus enable the caps to be elevated and removed from the opening of the compartment to freely communicate the container or barrel and the water-tight compartment.
This mechanism is made up of a central axis (11) with a disk (12) united to the latter. Twelve piston rods (13) are attached to the disk (12) by means of bolts (18) and each to a segment (14). Two pneumatic pistons (24), see
Thus, cap 2 is unlocked from container or barrel “a” and coupled to cap 4 of the water-tight compartment between the segments (14) and the tapered wheels (15).
Once caps 2 and 4 are coupled, they are raised by means of a pneumatic piston. As shown in
Cap 4 of the water-tight compartment comprises six bolts (30) placed equidistantly, as shown in
To ensure the correct order of operations, the air cylinders have sensors to indicate the position of the embolus. In addition, the system has sensors to indicate if the barrel is coupled to the flange of the water-tight compartment and if both caps are coupled to each other. All sensors are associated to an electronic logic, for example a PLC, to ensure that no step of the operation sequence is performed until the previous step is completed. Electronic logic prevents the cap from opening if the barrel is not coupled to the water-tight compartment, the water-tight compartment cap from opening if it is not coupled to the barrel cap, the barrel cap from uncoupling while the water-tight compartment cap is open, and the barrel from being removed while the double cap is open or when the barrel cap has not been locked to the flange thereof.
Any system operation can also be performed manually, for which purpose they have special pieces that enable this operation by means of telemanipulators.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
P060101652 | Apr 2006 | AR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1229912 | Doncaster | Jun 1917 | A |
1929761 | Thwaits | Oct 1933 | A |
1939139 | Schott | Dec 1933 | A |
2112465 | Maish | Mar 1938 | A |
4043482 | Brown | Aug 1977 | A |
4570816 | Ferris et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4580694 | Hempelmann et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4809873 | Fossey | Mar 1989 | A |
5105966 | Fort et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5660295 | Hroma et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5857308 | Dismore et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5931330 | Starr | Aug 1999 | A |
6095365 | Yielding | Aug 2000 | A |
6276552 | Vervisch | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296135 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
20080257888 | Lee | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1954811 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19548118 | Jun 1997 | DE |
2330549 | Apr 1999 | GB |
2330549 | Apr 1999 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070284016 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |