The present invention generally relates to an audio system that comprises an electro-acoustic transducer connected to a first and a second driver circuit, which electro-acoustic transducer comprises a first coil concentrically stacked on a second coil mechanically linked to a membrane, with the coils oscillatingly suspended in the magnetic field of a permanent magnet focused by a pole plate.
Such audio systems are for instance used in mobile applications like mobile phones or cars. Document EP 0 471 990 B1 discloses such an audio system that comprises an electro-acoustic transducer or speaker with a banked winding consisting of a first coil and a second coil. A first driver circuit is connected to the first coil and a second driver circuit is connected to the second coil to independently feed audio signals to the first and the second coil. In one embodiment disclosed in the document, a stereo audio signal is fed to the speaker, wherein the left audio signal is fed by the first driver circuit to the first coil and the right audio signal is fed by the second driver circuit to the second coil of the speaker. In another embodiment disclosed in the document, the speaker is used in a car, wherein the audio signal from the radio is fed to the first coil and the audio signal from the telephone is fed to the second coil. In both of these disclosed embodiments, audio signals are fed independently to the first and the second coil to achieve an overlaid acoustic signal.
Electro-acoustic transducers are in general hampered by mechanical and electrical nonlinearities that lead to all kind of different acoustic distortions. There are prior art speakers that use the coil of the speaker in a sensor operating mode to sense an electrical signal induced and to process the sensor signal based on a mathematical model of the speaker. A drawback for these solutions is the need for correct static loudspeaker parameters and the restriction of velocity measurement of the system.
It is an object of the invention to provide an audio system with two coils to reduce or eliminate such acoustic distortions without the need to create a mathematical model of the speaker.
This object is achieved with an audio system wherein the first coil and the second coil are mechanically arranged symmetrical to the pole plate in a rest position.
This mechanical set-up of a speaker allows for a more general sensing as well as a direct method to control offset-, stiffness- or tumbling-induced distortions in realtime without a long way round including a mathematical model of the speaker. It is furthermore advantageous to combine this mechanical set-up with an electrical set-up of the speaker where the first coil and the second coil are arranged in series with one of their electrical connections as common contact to the first and the second driver circuit.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter. The person skilled in the art will understand that various embodiments may be combined.
The mechanical set-up of the speaker 2 is arranged in such a way that the first coil 5 and the second coil 6 are mechanically arranged symmetrically to a midline 16 of the pole plate 13 in a rest position of the membrane 8. The rest position of the membrane 8 is the position the membrane 8 is in when it is not moving and the driver circuits 3 and 4 do not drive coils 5 and 6 with an electrical signal. With this mechanical set-up the maximum magnetic flux field is at the rest position of the membrane to enable a strong force Fdc caused by an electrical signal in the coils 5 and 6 to move the membrane out of it's rest position.
The electrical set-up of the speaker 2 is arranged in such a way that the two coils 5 and 6 are arranged in series with one of their electrical connections 17 as common contact to the first driver circuit 3 and the second driver circuit 4. This setup is advantageous for it only needs three contacts for the interface. An electrical separation of the coils requires an electrical interface with four connections, which is costly but in some cases could be beneficial for the signal processing by addressing crosstalk issues. In
In an initial phase to measure and test the audio system 1 the first driver circuit 3 is arranged to apply an audio signal to the first coil 5 and the second driver circuit 4 is arranged to sense an induced sensor signal in the second coil 6. During normal use of the audio system 1 both driver circuits 3 and 4 apply driver signals to the coils 5 and 6. In the following description there will be explained several different ways to use the above explained electrical and mechanical set-up of the speaker 2 to compensate mechanical and electrical nonlinearities that would lead to all kind of different acoustic distortions.
Offset-detection and Offset-compensation
The actual movement of the membrane 8 results from a sum of several forces, with all of them being dependent in a nonlinear way from the position of the coils 5 and 6. For instance, the driving force factor of the speaker 2 is calculated as B*L , where B denotes the magnetic flux at the position of the coils 5 and 6 and L denotes the length of wire in the magnetic field. In an embodiment, the driving force factor is greatest when the magnetic flux is at its greatest, i.e., at the rest position when the coils are arranged symmetrically to the midline 16 of the pole plate 13. The force factor decreases with increasing excursion of the coils 5 and 6. At the same time, the stiffness of the membrane 8 increases. Both of these nonlinearities further suffer from non-symmetry and other artifacts.
An imbalance in these forces can cause the membrane 8 to be offset from the rest position, resulting in further distortion. This can be minimized, however, if the offset can be adjusted. For a small speaker 2 used in mobile phones, where the peak to peak displacement can be up to 1 mm, an offset of the coils 5 and 6 from the midline 16, and thus an offset in the membrane 8, can be only a few microns.
Detection of the offset can be achieved by conducting an online measurement of the current and voltage in the coils 5 and 6. Both coils 5 and 6 face the same magnetic flux B and have the save velocity while moving. Therefore, the same voltage, the “back induced voltage” or EMF, is being induced in both coils 5 and 6. In
If an offset is detected, a DC voltage udc applied to one of the coils 5 or 6 shifts the operation point from the rest position to the desired position. This provides the advantage that even if there is a mechanical displacement of the rest position of the particular speaker 2, it is possible to measure this offset and to shift the displaced rest position to the desired position. In the desired position again the maximum magnetic flux field is available symmetrically to both coils. During normal use of the audio system 1 the first driver circuit 3 and the second driver circuit 4 measure the voltage at the electrical connections 17, 18 and 19 of the coils 5 and 6 and measure the current in the coils 5 and 6 to compare the impedance with the impedance detected in the initial phase. The initial phase means normal use of the speaker 2, but without an audio signal applied to the coils. Based on differences detected, one of the drivers is arranged to apply an offset compensation signal udc to the attached coil in order to compensate for the offset of the membrane 8.
Resonance Control
In mobile applications it is desired to extend the frequency range of speaker 2 to lower frequencies. Extending the frequency range to lower frequencies is limited by excursions that are maximal near the resonance frequency of the whole system. Whereas the mass is predominantly defined by the moved membrane 8 and coils 5 and 6 with the bobbin 7 and the stiffness of the resonant system results from the membrane stiffness and the backvolume stiffness.
Today's miniaturization results in a small backvolume with a high impact on the resulting (higher) resonance frequency when compared with the speaker 2 itself. There are several ways to lower the resulting resonance frequency, such as:
The simplest way is to add an adaptive filter to lower the excursion of the membrane 8 near the resonance frequency and to boost the excursion of the membrane 8 for low frequencies what will only work for simple sine sweeps, but fail for real world audio signals. For the instantaneous membrane position it is a complex function of nonlinear elements influenced by speed, acceleration and stiffness.
Another way to lower the resonance frequency of the audio system 1 is by applying a position dependent force (high force for high excursions) comparable to a softer spring.
When a DC voltage udc is applied to only one of the coils 5 and 6, the result is an offset as explained above for the offset compensation feature. According to this embodiment, for resonance control the DC voltage udc is supplied to both coils 5 and 6, but with swapped signs. As can be seen in
The resulting shape of the additional force Fdc for different DC voltages udc can be seen in
Note that the range in which this resonance control feature works is limited to the “linear” part of force Fdc which fortunately matches the allowed excursion for speaker 2 when used in a mobile device, which is in the range of 1.3 to 2.3 mm from the pot 14 and peak to peak excursions of about 0.3 mm.
An example of a simplified linearized calculation shows, that a speaker with 70 mg mass and a resonance frequency at 500 Hz shows audio system resonance with 1.8 cm3 backvolume at about 800 Hz. To shift that audio system resonance to 730 Hz needs either a 3 cm3 backvolume or a DC current of ˜200 mA (300 mW).
This means that the first driver circuit 3 is arranged to add the DC resonance control signal udc to the audio signal applied to the first coil 5 and that the second driver circuit 4 is arranged to subtract the DC resonance control signal udc from the driver signal applied to the second coil 6 in the optimization mode to increase the stiffness of the speaker 2. It is particular advantageous that the first driver circuit 3 and the second driver circuit 4 are arranged to add/subtract the DC resonance control signal udc for high excursions of the membrane 8, i.e., above a predetermined threshold, only to save energy.
Position Detection
It is not possible to use the nonlinear shape as a position detector for a single coil system, as it is only possible to track the induced voltage which is a function of magnetic flux field B times velocity. First of all we need a representation of the back induced voltage (EMF). If we measure the induced current and induced voltage simultaneously to measure the actual impedance Zdc of the coils 5 and 6 (where Z denotes the complex valued impedance R+jωL) we can derive the induced voltage by the formula:
e.m.fcoil5=uc5=Ucoil5−Zdc,coil5*Icoil5 (1)
e.m.fcoil6=uc6=Ucoil6−Zdc,coil6*Icoil6 (2)
For a single coil system this value equals the product of B*L and v (velocity) which can be integrated to gain the position, but lacks the constant during integration. The double coil system offers a way to distinguish between the B field and velocity v and therefore finds a stable estimate of the position at any time.
Since both coils move with the same velocity we need to make use of a formula, in which the induced voltages of both coils are set into relation to each other. The derived formulas are:
sumdiff=abs[(uc5+uc6)/(uc5−uc6)] (3)
distinct=abs[uc5/uc6] (4)
Note: sumdiff and distinct are rid of velocity!
Bvspos=sumdiff*(−sign(distinct)) (5)
Bvspos_shifted=(1−sign(distinct))*min(Bvspos) (6)
BL1BL2rel(x)=Bvpos+Bvpos_shifted (7)
BL1BL2rel(x) is a signal being distinct, but nonlinearly dependent on the position of the coils 5 and 6 and can be derived from measurement of Ucoilx, Icoilx and Zdc,coilx. Based on above formulas, therefore, it is possible to detect the actual position of the membrane 8 of the audio system 1 given the shape of BL(x).
Tumble Detection
Although the resulting force in a dynamic loudspeaker like the speaker 2 produces movements (direction 11) perpendicular to the surface of membrane 8, small orthogonal force components are unavoidable. These components result in tumbling of the membrane 8, which means that for such a movement the acoustic flow is zero even though the membrane 8 is moving in a rotational manner.
To optimize the performance of speaker 2 mandatorily leads to maximizing force by minimizing the airgap between pot 14 and the coils 5 and 6. The tumbling movement contradicts a small airgap, which means that tumbling in a narrow airgap causes a periodic touching of the coils 5 and 6 with the pot 14 what leads to a bad acoustic of the speaker 2 (e.g. rubb and buzz).
A simple way to overcome tumbling is to damp the whole audio system what influences other parameters as well as efficiency.
Since for a single coil the rotational center is found within the center of gravity, any induced voltage due to the tumbling movement is being cancelled out. It is not a simple task to find a reliable electrical footprint in the impedance curve of a single coil system.
For the double coil system like the audio system 1, the center of gravity is found at the interface between the coils 5 and 6. A rotational movement therefore induces a voltage, which is not cancelled completely as can be seen from
Note that tumbling in real life occurs as an additional rotational movement to the major linear up and down movement. Nevertheless there is a way to distinguish the induced voltage whether originated by tumbling or linear movement.
Once the critical tumble frequencies are detected a certain number of adaptive notch filters can damp very selective these frequencies in the electric domain of the amplifier.
This means that for tumble detection the audio system 1 comprises phase delay detection means to detect a phase delay between the voltages induced in the first coil 5 and the second coil 6 of the audio system 1. Filter means damp the frequencies of the audio signal that comprise a phase delay in the sensor signals.
Speaker Parameters Storage
Standard flash memory components require at least 3 pins. The audio system 1 offers a simple way to use the three connections 17, 18 and 19 as a flash memory interface, which can be addressed by a certain electrical pattern. In order not to destroy the speaker 2 during programming and reading by overstressing the membrane 8 with DC, a low voltage flash has to be used (1.5V).
Compatibility and Efficiency
The double coil audio system 1 requires two driver circuits 3 and 4 with two amplifiers, both of them connected to one of the coils 5 and 6. If the double coil speaker 2 shows a nominal impedance of 8Ω, each of the coils 5 and 6 contribute with 4Ω. Power performance for mobile devices is obviously restricted to the voltage of the battery found within the device.
If we compare a single voice coil system to the double voice coil audio system 1 with a battery voltage of e.g. 3.7 Volts and neglecting all losses, we find a max. power available for an 8Ω speaker of
This means that a higher power can be achieved at a given battery voltage or the same power with less battery voltage. As seen from this example compatibility to state of the art speakers is given by simply connecting the double coil speaker 2 at those coil interfaces which are not common for both coils.
Advantage of the Proposed Solution
State of the art speaker amplifier combinations sense several parameters as well, but lack the robustness of direct corrective actions for they have to go a long way round a mathematical speaker model. This mathematical speaker model is dependent on correct static speaker parameters in order to predict correct output of the speaker and therefore to find inverse filter parameters to cancel unwanted effects out.
The concept of a double coil audio system 1 offers the above explained features to improve speakers' performance, robustness and lifetime more directly as well as the position.
The double coils 5 and 6 allow for sensing several parameters, but offers immediate actions to directly correct for offset deviations, stiffness deviations or tumbling via the electric interface. No static speaker parameters except BL(x) are required, all parameters are measured online and referred to a calibration measurement. All features outlined above relate to real life situations which can decrease the speaker performance or even destruct a speaker 2 completely due to overstress.
The speaker in above disclosed embodiments of the invention comprises an electrical set-up where the first coil and the second coil are arranged in series with one of their electrical connections 17 as common contact to the first driver circuit 3 and the second driver circuit 4. In another embodiment of the invention the first coil and the second coil are electrically separated from each other and therefore comprise four electrical contacts. This enables the ability to drive the coils with separated signals, as might be advantageous for some applications of use of the speaker.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007749 | Anderson | Jul 1935 | A |
3665124 | Sotome | May 1972 | A |
3766334 | Burke | Oct 1973 | A |
4598178 | Rollins | Jul 1986 | A |
4783824 | Kobayashi | Nov 1988 | A |
4897877 | Tetzlaff | Jan 1990 | A |
5197104 | Padi | Mar 1993 | A |
5828767 | Button | Oct 1998 | A |
6148088 | Suzuki | Nov 2000 | A |
7676053 | Nagaoka | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8199920 | Valenti, III | Jun 2012 | B2 |
9173035 | Button | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9301072 | Reining | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20040156527 | Stiles | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050031138 | Browning | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031139 | Browning | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060104451 | Browning | May 2006 | A1 |
20070183620 | Stiles | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080025551 | Wehner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090028371 | Bailey | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100189284 | Kuze | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120294450 | Ozcan | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130202122 | Citerin | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140056466 | Jenq | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150030167 | Pan | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2265654 | Oct 1997 | CN |
2324741 | Jun 1999 | CN |
2448040 | Sep 2001 | CN |
1450833 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1812651 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1812656 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1812657 | Aug 2006 | CN |
200959657 | Oct 2007 | CN |
102006052063 | May 2008 | DE |
102008057673 | Jul 2009 | DE |
0471990 | Apr 1995 | EP |
2323424 | May 2011 | EP |
2400784 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2472905 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2089171 | Jun 1982 | GB |
10276495 | Oct 1998 | JP |
9416536 | Jul 1994 | WO |
2009064833 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT/MY2014/000071, dated Sep. 8, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140321690 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |