Mechanism to synchronize the opening and closing of two leaves or two pivoting parts configured with a central opening.
Dual synchronized closing doors are not widespread because of the complexity, bulk and high cost of synchronization mechanisms. They are usually equipped with two motorized and communicating actuators (e.g. EP2551434A2, EP2551435A2). The same drawbacks apply to non-motorized synchronization systems, which are based either on the principle of the pivoting rudder (e.g. FR2568929B3, EP0819815A1) or on that of the transmission shaft (e.g. CN202325037U). The pivoting rudder only offers a limited opening angle and requires the addition of two tie rods at the ends of the door leaves, which implies a broader framework and a specific installation. Regarding the transmission shaft, it requires bevel gears at both ends which fit into those of two vertical pivots. A variant of the application DE3546242A1 includes an opening arm with two pivots, but the mechanism requires an arrangement of chains, strings, connecting rods, spindles, pins and a cross-like articulation, hidden under the floor. These mechanisms are heavy, expensive and poorly compatible with hinges to be located inside or outside the doors.
So being, existing synchronization mechanisms are restricted to specific applications, such as telephone booths, gates, transports and public places. Yet, it is well known that a central opening door reduces clutter while opening, when compared to a single-leaf door with the same opening.
This mechanism aims to make it more accessible synchronizing double leaves or two pivoting parts configured with a central opening. According to my research, it does not exist to date, any simple and lightweight mechanism for the mechanical synchronization of double leaves, be it those of a walk-through door, a cabinet door, the door of a piece of furniture, of a vehicle, of a household appliance such as a refrigerator or the two leaves of a casement window.
The double-pivot synchronization is characterized in that each leaf (2 or 3) is connected to the end of an opening arm (6) by an opening pivot (5). The other end of the opening arm (6) is connected to a second pivot (8 or 12). This second pivot adds a degree of freedom to the components that are connected to it and thereby, frees them from the constraints imposed by the rotation of the leaves on the hinges (4). These components can thus be synchronized more easily.
The mechanism comprises an arrangement of rigid elements, connected between them and attached to the frame. Said arrangement is configured such that all elements can be located on the frame side, allowing both leaves to close completely along a line linking their axis of rotation. The mechanism can thus be hidden beneath the frame, if desired. The movement of each mobile element occurs in a plane orthogonal to the axis of rotation of the leaves, limiting the thickness of the mechanism.
Here are three non-limitative embodiments of the double-pivot synchronization mechanism:
A first non-limitative embodiment (
The distance between the opening pivots (6) and outer ends of the leaves constitutes a second parameter. The combination of these two adjustments gives room to adapt the mechanism to different leaves' widths and to control the maximum opening angle. This embodiment is economical and particularly suitable for manufacturers of furniture and cabinets that use custom-made components.
A second non-limitative embodiment (
As the path of the carriage (7) is reduced, this embodiment is more adapted to a shallow frame (1) and makes it easier to adjust to the width of the leaves. It mainly targets the synchronization of existing double-door cabinets or furniture units.
For common applications (
A third non-limitative embodiment (
To make the installation easier, the front pivots (13) and the toothed ends (14) can be pre-installed in a gear housing (15) whose both sides are opened to allow the forearms (10) to pivot freely. For safety reasons, the toothed ends (14) must be covered either by a gear housing (15) or by other means. This third embodiment is robust and versatile. It allows, among other things, to replace the single leaf of a walk-through door with two narrower leaves. By adjusting the dimension and the shape of components, the mechanism can be hidden under the lintel. This embodiment is also suitable for recessed synchronization mechanisms, as in vehicles or household appliances.
Compared to a single-leaf door with the same opening, this mechanism reduces the frequency and severity of injuries associated with a sudden opening of the door from a person on the other side. The width of the door leaves (2 and 3) and their opening speed are halved and the central opening allows two individuals to see each other quickly to prevent an accident.
The space required for the opening of the door being reduced, new architectures or arrangements are possible. The two leaves (2 and 3) can be of different width.
This mechanism allows the use of conventional hinges (4), either located inside or outside the door. If necessary, hinges (4) can be gotten around by the opening arms (6), by curving them outward. If self-closing is required, tension should be lessened to reduce torsion and traction force. This can be achieved by removing self-closing from some hinges or by other means.
When required, the right leaf (2) is distinguished from the left leaf (3). Inner edges of the leaves then have an oblique rabbet (
When the synchronization mechanism is recessed, as in the case of the door of a refrigerator, it can be installed either at the leaves' top, bottom or both. To reduce the size of a vertical door, leaves can be arranged horizontally, as in the case of an oven door. The mechanism can then be installed at the left of the leaves, at the right or on both sides.
For common use, the total thickness of the mechanism is about one or two centimeters. To maximize clearance on both sides, some arms can be crank-shaped. This mechanism can thus be used to synchronize the two leaves of a cabinet door, of a piece of furniture, a vehicle, a household appliance or a window.
The synchronization of double leaves meets a practical need. Often, both leaves of the double door of a cabinet must be opened to access the desired object, which requires two hands to perform these operations simultaneously. To put inside an object of significant size, a single hand is available, since one hand is already being used to hold this object. Conversely, to remove the object from the cabinet, only one hand is left to close the two leaves. The time savings resulting from the synchronization of the leaves may seem small, but while accumulating over the lifetime of a frequently used door, the results are significant. The risk of dropping an object by attempting to open or close a door leaf with a hand full is also reduced.
The synchronization of the rear-door leaves of a vehicle, allows for opening, locking in the open position and closing the door by manipulating a single leaf. For an emergency vehicle such as an ambulance, the time saved can be invaluable.
The first embodiment is economical and particularly suitable for manufacturers of furniture and cabinets that use custom-made components. The second embodiment mainly targets the synchronization of existing double doors of cabinets or furniture units. The third embodiment is robust and versatile; it can replace the single leaf of a walk-through door by two narrower leaves. By adjusting the dimension and the shape of components, the mechanism can be hidden under the lintel. This third embodiment is also suitable for recessed synchronization mechanisms, as in vehicles or household appliances.
This mechanism can be used to synchronize the two leaves of:
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2014/059691 | 3/12/2014 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61779112 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61779151 | Mar 2013 | US |