The present invention relates to sheet feeding and, in particular, to the feeding of sheets, such as paper sheets, one-at-a-time from a stack and detecting double sheets.
It is known to feed sheets sequentially, i.e., one-at-a-time from a vertical stack, e.g., in sheet-printing and sheet-coating machines. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,125,014 and 7,207,558 disclose a sheet feeding apparatus employing suction belts which grip the upper surface of a top sheet in the stack and advance the sheet. The disclosures of those patents are incorporated by reference herein.
It is, of course, desirable to prevent the feeding of double sheets, defined herein as arising when a second sheet adheres itself to the underside of the sheet above it in the stack, e.g., due to static friction. Such double sheet feeding is undesirable, especially in the case where paper sheets are fed to a sheet-coating apparatuses in which the coatings are cured by passing the coated sheets beneath a lamp which emits heat. In the case of double sheets being fed, the extra bottom sheet can become dislodged from the top sheet and possibly immobilized beneath the lamp, whereupon overheating of the immobilized sheet can produce a fire.
Efforts to sense the feeding of double sheets are known, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,420,747 in which sheets are passed successively through the nip of a roller pair, one of the rollers being driven about a fixed axis, and the other of the rollers being movable. The passing of a sheet through the nip causes the movable roller to be displaced. That roller displacement is sensed by a transmitter which sends a signal to electric evaluator circuits. When double sheets pass through the nip, the greater thickness of the double sheets produces an increase in the roller displacement, which is sensed by the evaluator circuits, and an appropriate warning signal is produced. The disclosure of this patent is incorporated by reference herein.
Despite the precaution heretofore taken in the art to prevent the feeding of double sheets, room for improvement remains. For example, in the case of the roller pair disclosed in afore-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,420,747, it will be appreciated that expensive rollers of high-precision manufacture and positioning are required in order to be able to reliably detect the minute difference in sheet thickness between a single sheet and double sheets, especially when very thin paper sheets are being fed. The reason is that if rollers of imprecise positioning or shape, e.g., of eccentric or out-of-round shape, are used, displacements of the floating roller can occur just because of such imprecise positioning or shape. Since the difference in roller displacement between the feeding of single sheets versus double sheets is minute, the creation of such false displacements can produce unreliable results.
It would be desirable to provide a sheet feeding system which minimizes the chances for double sheets to be fed from a stack, and/or maximizes the chances for the feeding of double sheets to be detected along a feed path.
In the disclosed preferred embodiment, a feeder head includes a suction cup which can be lowered, together with straddling suction belts, against the top sheet of the stack. With the belts stationary and receiving no suction, suction is applied to the cup so the top sheet adheres to the cup at a location between the suction belts. The cup is then raised relative to the belts, causing the top sheet to assume a wavy or corrugated shape. As a result, if another sheet is adhered to the underside of the top sheet, it will tend to become dislodged and fall back onto the stack. Then, suction is applied to the belts and removed from the cup. The top sheet is now adhered only to the belts which are driven to feed the top sheet.
In another aspect, a sheet being fed is advanced across a brush. Bristles of the brush engage the underside of the sheet being fed. In the case of double sheets being fed, i.e., when a second sheet is adhered to the underside of the sheet being fed, movement of the second sheet will be retarded by contact with the bristles, thereby tending to dislodge the second sheet from the upper sheet.
In yet another aspect, a sheet being fed is advanced through a nip formed between a pair of rollers. A fixed roller is mounted with a fixed axis of rotation while a floating roller is mounted so that its axis of rotation can move relative to the fixed roller. When a sheet passes through the nip, the thickness of the sheet causes the floating roller to move away from the fixed roller. This causes a bracket on which the floating roller is mounted to engage a lever which transmits the movement to the reciprocable plunger of a transducer, causing the transducer to send a signal to an evaluator circuit. The signal strength is proportional to the extent of movement of the floating roller. Thus, when double sheets are fed, the added thickness of the extra sheet will result in a stronger signal being generated which can be evaluated to identify the presence of a double-sheet condition. The transmitter signals are detected very frequently, e.g., once per millisecond, and the detected signals are averaged over one or more complete revolutions of the rollers so that signal variations produced by irregularities in the shape or orientation of the rollers, etc., will cancel-out whereby the evaluator circuit will be able to recognize a signal change resulting from the presence of a double sheet condition.
Depicted schematically in
The feeder head 10 includes relatively movable suction mechanisms, e.g., a pair of side suction devices, preferably in the form of two perforated horizontal suction belts 12 which straddle an intermediate suction device in the form of a row of suction cups 14 (only one suction cup shown in
Each suction belt is mounted endlessly around a pair of rollers 19, 21, one of which 19 is driven, so that the horizontal lower flights of the belts can horizontally displace a sheet that is adhered thereto by suction.
In order for the topmost sheet to become gripped by the suction belts and suction cups, vertical movement of the suction belts 12 and the suction cups 14 is provided by a raising/lowering mechanism 20, 22, 23. The cups 14 are mounted on a common cup carrier 18 to which a downward force is applied periodically by means of a rotary driven cam wheel 20. As the cam wheel is rotated by a horizontal drive shaft 17 (
Mounted on the cup carrier for movement vertically with respect thereto is a belt carrier 24 which has a pair of sections 24A, 24B that straddle the row of suction cups 14 and carry respective suction belts 12. The belt carrier 24 is biased downwardly by compression springs 23. The cup carrier 18 includes shoulders 18A received in vertical slots 24A of the carrier 24 to form a lost motion connection 26 which enables the cup carrier to move vertically relative to the belt carrier by a limited distance as will be explained.
The suction lines for the suction cups 14 on the one hand, and for the suction belts 12 on the other hand, can be selectively and independently opened and closed relative to a suction source 31 by suitable valves 32, 34 under the control of a controller 36.
In operation, prior to the feeding of a top sheet of a stack S of sheets (e.g., paper sheets being fed to a paper coater), the feeder head is oriented as shown in
Now, the controller 36 opens valve 32 to communicate the cups 14 with suction, whereupon the cups grip the top sheet. Then, the cup-raising section of the cam begins to engage the cup carrier, enabling the tensioned springs 22 to begin raising the cup carrier, whereupon the cup 14 raises the center portion of the top relative to the sheet's side portions disposed beneath the belts. This causes those side portions to slide slightly relative to the belts, causing the sheet to assume a non-planar shape, e.g., a wavy or corrugated shape (
Then, the controller opens the valve 34 to communicate suction to the belts and closes the valve 32 to block suction to the cup. The top sheet is now attached by suction only to the belts 12 (
Once the belts have gripped the top sheet, the shoulders 18A of the still-rising cup carrier 18 raise the belt carrier 24. Power is then supplied to the drive rollers 19 of the belts to begin rotating the belts in unison to feed the top sheet in a feed direction F where it can be picked up by driven feed rollers (not shown).
After the sheet has been fed, the rotating cam 20 begins a new feeding operation by lowering the cup carrier, and the previously described sequence is repeated for the next sheet. As the stack is depleted, the table on which it is mounted is periodically raised by a conventional indexing mechanism to keep the top sheet at a prescribed elevation.
Located immediately downstream of the feeder head 10 is a sheet-contact brush 50 (
Disposed along the sheet travel path are sensors (not shown) which sense the presence of sheets. The controller 36 knows the timing when each fed sheet should reach each sensor. Thus, when an extra sheet is removed from the bottom of a fed sheet by the brush 50, that extra sheet will constitute a sheet not in the normal sequence (i.e., not recognized by the controller) so such sheet will eventually be sensed by a sensor at a location where no sheet is supposed to be at that time, thus resulting in an alarm signal being emitted, or even a shutdown of all or part of the feed system until the extra sheet has been removed.
Located in the sheet feed path downstream of the brush 50 is a double sheet detector mechanism 60 (
In an exemplary embodiment, the floating roller 66 is mounted on carrier in the form of a bracket 70 that is freely pivotable about a horizontal axis C, thus enabling the floating roller 66 to vertically float. The bracket 70 includes an upwardly projecting finger 72, an upper end of which is arranged to engage a contact projection 74 of a lever 76 that is freely rotatable about a vertical axis D. When a sheet passed through the nip formed by the rollers, the thickness of the sheet causes the floating roller 66 to move away from the fixed roller 64. This causes the finger 72 of the bracket 70 to engage the contact projection of the lever 76.
Arranged to contact the lever 76 at a location remote from the axis D is the horizontal plunger 80 of a conventional electric transducer 82. The plunger 80 is linearly reciprocable, and the transducer 82 is operable to generate an electrical signal commensurate with the extent of the plunger's linear displacement and send that signal to the controller 36. It can be appreciated that the signal strength is proportional to the extent of the movement of the floating roller 66 away from the fixed roller 64. The electrical signal is detected very frequently, e.g., once per millisecond, and the detected signals are averaged over a distance corresponding to a complete revolution, or an integer multiple thereof, of each of the rollers 64 and 66, so that signal variations produced by irregularities in the shape or orientations of the rollers will cancel out. For example, if one of the rollers has a circumference of 1 inch and the other roller has a circumference of 1.5 inches, the detected signals will be averaged over a distance corresponding to 3 inches, i.e., three revolutions of the 1 inch roller and two revolutions of the 1.5 inch roller. Of course, if both rollers have the same circumference, the detected signals can be averaged over one complete revolution of the rollers. In an exemplary embodiment, the drive system is controlled such that the roller or rollers are rotated or the sheet is fed at a known speed. When the speed is known, the time interval in which the rollers each rotate for one revolution or an integer multiple of one revolution can be determined, and the measurement of the signals to be averaged is taken during the determined time interval.
In the event double sheets are fed through the nip, the extra sheet thickness produced by the presence of the additional sheet will generate greater displacement of the transducer's plunger and a greater averaged output signal which can be recognized as a double sheet condition by the controller which compares the averaged output signal to a reference value. The controller can then emit a warning signal, or shut down the entire feed system, or only a part of the feed system, including the detector mechanism 60 and the mechanisms located upstream thereof (to allow sheets that have already passed the detector mechanism to continue being treated, e.g., coated).
It will be appreciated that the provision of a lever 76 to transmit displacement of the bracket 70 to the transducer's plunger 80 will amplify the amount of the plunger's displacement, because the distance between the lever's pivot axis D and the point of contact between the lever and the plunger 80 is greater than the distance between the axis D and the point of contact between the lever and the finger 72. Since displacements of the bracket 70 will be slight (due to the minute thickness of the sheets being fed), such amplification will make the plunger movement easier to measure.
It will also be appreciated that, in the absence of extremely precise manufacturing techniques, there will likely occur slight eccentricities in the shape of the nip rollers, or the rollers may be slightly out-of-round, or the axis of the rollers might not be perfectly horizontal. Any of these possibilities can cause distortions in the plunger displacement which are unrelated to the sheets. In other words, as the detector operates without sheets passing therethrough, the output of the transducer, which theoretically should be constant, will vary due to the afore-described irregularities. Thus, in the absence of highly expensive precision-made rollers, the signals generated by the transducer may be ineffective from the standpoint of being able to accurately detect the presence of double sheets. However, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment, signals from the transducer are detected very frequently, i.e., once each millisecond, and those signals are averaged in the manner discussed above, whereby the signal discrepancies due to the above-mentioned irregularities will cancel out. Thus, when double sheets are fed, the resulting increase in the averaged transducer signals will accurately reflect the increased sheet thickness and enable the double sheet condition to be recognized.
This will be understood from the following description of a preferred mode of operation. Before the beginning of a sheet feeding operation, the detector mechanism 60 is operated by driving the roller 64 against the roller 66. The resulting signals from the transducer 82 (representing displacements of the roller 66) are sent to a conventional signal averaging circuit 36A in the controller which averages the signals frequently, e.g., every millisecond (which is considerably less than the time for a sheet to pass through the nip). The averaging produces a reference value or “zero-point”. Then, single sheets are fed through the nip to produce, for each sheet, multiple transducer signals which are averaged to produce a first average (which will be higher than the zero point). Then, double sheets are fed through the nip to produce, for each sheet, multiple transducer outputs which are averaged to produce a second average. (which will be higher than the zero point and the first average). Each of these averaging operations occurs for signals taken during an interval of time corresponding to the time in which the first and second rollers each rotate a distance corresponding to a complete revolution or an integer multiple of a complete revolution. Therefore, during a normal sheet feeding operation, transducer outputs currently being obtained for each sheet will be averaged to produce a current average value for each sheet. The controller 36 will calculate the difference between such current average value and the zero point and determine therefrom whether single or double sheets are being fed, based on that difference. Thus, the present invention enables a nip/transducer type of double sheet detector to be accurately used with imprecisely manufactured (inexpensive) and imprecisely oriented nip rollers.
Alternative ways of performing this method do not require that the zero point be used as the reference value being compared with the current average displacement. Rather, the reference value could be the average displacement produced while feeding only single sheets or while feeding only double sheets, since a comparison of either of those values with the current average value can be used to indicate whether single sheets or double sheets are currently being fed.
In a preferred embodiment, the control system of the apparatus commands the speed of the drive systems which cause the rotation of the nipped rollers of this double sheet detection system. It is understood that the time interval between measurements is very small in comparison to the time of one rotation of the nipped roller with the movable axis of rotation. As a result, the control system can determine how many measurements will be made in the time required for one rotation of the nipped rollers. In one embodiment, the drive system is configured to operate with the required degree of accuracy so as to make it possible to know the time of one or more full or complete rotations of the rollers, and thus neither of the nipped rollers need have any type of sensed datum or “encoder” type device or sensor. The drive system in this embodiment thus operates as an open-loop system, i.e., a system in which positional feedback is not used to adjust the drive control. In a preferred embodiment of an open-loop system, the drive system is a stepper motor whose step rate and other specifications are known such the time of one or more rotations of one or both of the nipped rollers is known to the required degree of accuracy. Alternatively, a close-loop system, i.e., a system in which positional feedback is used to adjust the drive control, can be used.
Although the present invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additions, deletions, modifications, and substitutions not specifically described may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/206,321, filed Sep. 8, 2008, the entire contents of which is incorporated by reference herein, which in turns claims the benefit of the Sep. 7, 2007 filing date of U.S. Provisional Application no. 60/935,946.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4420747 | Kistner | Dec 1983 | A |
5988634 | Elrick et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6634598 | Susko | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6672587 | Möhringer et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6955348 | Koga | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7125014 | Dolz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7207558 | Edinger | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7926807 | Dahlgren | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20050280205 | Knierim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070018383 | Ohara et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20090057995 | Murakami et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110285079 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60935946 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12206321 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13088691 | US |