Certain data storage systems have recording heads that write information to recording media. In at least some data storage systems, a recording medium may store information in adjacent tracks that go from the center of the recording medium to the outer perimeter of the recording medium.
Occasionally, when a recording head is writing information to one particular track of a recording medium, the recording head has an undesirable effect on another track. For instance, one issue is known as side track erasure. In one particular example of side track erasure, a recording head is writing to a track, and it generates undesirable magnetic flux that alters information stored in one or more adjacent tracks or bits.
In one embodiment, an apparatus includes a return pole (RP) and a shield. The RP has a first RP magnetic layer, a second RP magnetic layer, and a RP non-magnetic layer. The RP non-magnetic layer separates and magnetically decouples the RP first and second magnetic layers. The shield has a first shield magnetic layer, a second shield magnetic layer, and a shield non-magnetic layer. The shield non-magnetic layer separates and magnetically decouples the shield first and second magnetic layers.
In another embodiment, a recording head includes an outer magnetic shell, a write pole, and an inner magnetic shell. The inner magnetic shield is between the outer magnetic shell and the write pole. The non-magnetic layer magnetically decouples the inner and the outer magnetic shells.
In yet another embodiment, a method includes generating magnetic flux from a recording head magnetization coil and from a recording head yoke. The recording head magnetization coil flux and the recording head yoke flux are collected through an inner magnetic shell placed at least partially around the recording head magnetization coil and the recording head yoke.
These and various other features and advantages that characterize the claimed embodiments will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reviewing the associated drawings.
Embodiments of the present disclosure include recording heads that illustratively reduce or eliminate undesirable magnetic flux from reaching a recording medium. In an embodiment, this is accomplished by placing a double shell around the recording head writer. Double shells illustratively include two magnetic layers that are separated by a non-magnetic layer. The magnetic layer closest to the recording medium can be viewed as the outer shell, and the magnetic layer further away from the recording medium can be viewed as the inner shell. The inner shell and the non-magnetic layer capture and isolate some of the magnetic flux generated by the writer, preventing it from reaching the outer shell. As will be described in greater detail below, reducing the amount of or density of magnetic flux in the outer shell illustratively reduces the likelihood that undesirable magnetic flux will reach the recording medium. Accordingly, at least certain embodiments of the present disclosure help to prevent harmful effects of undesirable magnetic flux such as side track erasure.
In an embodiment, shield outer shell 141 and return pole outer shell 121 form one continuous or approximately continuous piece of magnetic material. Shield inner shell 143 and return pole inner shield 123 form one continuous or approximately continuous piece of magnetic material, and shield non-magnetic layer 142 and return pole non-magnetic layer 122 form one continuous or approximately continuous piece of non-magnetic material. The continuous or approximately continuous layers included within embodiments are optionally formed simultaneously (e.g. at one electrochemical plating step). The continuous or approximately continuous layers could however be separately formed structures that contact each other or are otherwise magnetically coupled to each other.
The inner shell components described above (i.e. 123 and 143) can be viewed as the inner shell for head 100. The outer shell components (i.e. 121 and 141) can be viewed as the outer shell for head 100, and the non-magnetic layers (i.e. 122 and 142) can be viewed as a non-magnetic layer separating and magnetically decoupling the magnetic inner and outer shells.
In an embodiment, leading shield outer shell 331 and first return pole outer shell 311 form one continuous or approximately continuous piece of magnetic material. Leading shell non-magnetic layer 332 and first return pole non-magnetic layer 312 form one continuous or approximately continuous piece of non-magnetic material, and leading shield inner shell 333 and first return pole inner shell 313 for one continuous or approximately continuous piece of magnetic material. The continuous or approximately continuous layers included within embodiments are optionally formed simultaneously (e.g. at one electrochemical plating step). The continuous or approximately continuous layers could however be separately formed structures that contact each other or are otherwise magnetically coupled to each other.
Similarly, first trailing shield 350, second trailing shield outer shell 341, and second return pole outer shell 321 illustratively form one continuous or approximately continuous piece of magnetic material. Second trailing shield non-magnetic layer 342 and second return pole non-magnetic layer 322 form one continuous or approximately continuous piece of non-magnetic material, and second trailing shield inner shield 343 and second return pole inner shield 323 form one continuous or approximately continuous piece of magnetic material.
The inner shell components described above (i.e. 313, 323, 333, and 343) can be viewed as the inner shell for head 300. The outer shell components (i.e. 311, 321, 331, 341, and 350) can be viewed as the outer shell for head 300, and the non-magnetic layers (i.e. 312, 322, 332, and 342) can be viewed as the non-magnetic layer separating and magnetically decoupling the magnetic inner and outer shells.
Recording heads having two magnetic shells separated by a non-magnetic layer illustratively provide several advantages. One advantage is that they may reduce unwanted magnetic flux from being emitted from the recording head (e.g. flux that may cause side track erasures).
As was described previously, one possible cause of erasing flux, such as flux 415 in
Another benefit of double shell writers is that they may be able to provide a stronger writing field. For instance, the strength of the writing field generally increases when either the distance between the yoke and the write pole tip, or the distance between the coils and the write pole tip decreases. One factor that has limited how short these distances can be has been erasure flux. Decreasing either the yoke-to-write pole tip distance or the coils-to-write pole tip distance also decreases the distances between the yoke and/or coils to the shields. These decreased distances to the shields have generally resulted in increased erasure flux. However, with double shells, both coils and/or yokes individually or in combination can be brought closer to the shields and hence closer to the write pole tip without resulting in increased erasure flux. The potential erasure flux associated with shorter distances is taken away and isolated by the inner shell and the non-magnetic layer. Additionally, in a somewhat related fashion, another advantage of double shell writers is that it permits a greater variety of positioning of coils and/or yokes. This may be beneficial from a design perspective or from a manufacturing perspective. For instance, it could allow for different positioning of components within a recording head or allow for less stringent alignment requirements in manufacturing (e.g. looser layer-to-layer registration requirements).
Yet another advantage of double shell writers is that the magnetic/non-magnetic/magnetic tri-layer structure reduces the self-demagnetization field at the edges of the first leading shield and the second trailing shield. The demagnetization field at the edges is one of the main causes for magnetic domain formation. Therefore, double shell writers reduce the occurrence of magnetic domains and thus further reduce the side track erasure risk due to that magnetic flux redirects toward media at domain walls.
The cross-sections shown in
As has been described above, embodiments of the present disclosure include recording head writers that have double shells. The double shells are made from tri-layers of two magnetic layers separated by a non-magnetic layer. The inner magnetic layer captures stray magnetic flux such as flux emitted by the coils and/or yoke. The non-magnetic layer magnetically decouples the inner and outer magnetic layers, thus decreasing the amount of flux in the outer shell. For example, the outer layer illustratively only carries the flux that is returned from writing to the recording media. This reduces the amount of flux in the outer shield which may reduce the likelihood of generating erasure flux. Additionally, in at least certain embodiments of double shell writers, the non-magnetic layers are covered by the outer magnetic layers such that no portions of the non-magnetic layers are exposed at the air-bearing surface side. This also illustratively reduces the likelihood of erasure flux by keeping the flux contained within the double shell.
Finally, it is to be understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of various embodiments have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of various embodiments, this detailed description is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of structure and arrangements of parts within the principles of the present disclosure to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed. In addition, although the embodiments described herein are directed to hard disc drives, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the teachings of the disclosure can be applied to other types of data storage systems, without departing from the scope and spirit of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4122347 | Kovalsky et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4516180 | Narishige et al. | May 1985 | A |
4799118 | Yamada et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5311387 | Mallary | May 1994 | A |
6233116 | Chen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6842313 | Mallary | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6954340 | Shukh et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7057853 | Okada et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7233457 | Johnston et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7289295 | Guan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7369360 | Vas'ko et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7542233 | Hirata et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20020071208 | Batra et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030002227 | Jarratt | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030210494 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040004786 | Shukh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027716 | Chen et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066576 | Lee et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040252415 | Shukh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050128637 | Johnston et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050259357 | Kameda | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060119982 | Honjo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070097546 | Li et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070139819 | Yazawa et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080165452 | Bozeman et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090168260 | Allen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100188775 | Macken et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110249360 | Nunokawa et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120147503 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |