This application relates to box-type ammunition magazines, particularly to detachable multiple column (double stack) magazines for rimmed cartridges.
Typically, ammunition magazines for firearms fall into two broad categories: fixed and detachable. Box magazines may fall into either of these categories.
Rimmed cartridges present certain challenges for designing and manufacturing reliable ammunition feeding devices, particularly for higher capacity box magazines, not encountered with rimless cartridges. The most popular types of rimmed ammunition include shotgun shells and rimfire cartridges, the latter being used in rifles and pistols.
Unlike rifle and pistol ammunition which has a very consistent standardization in length of a live cartridge from most manufacturers and/or loads, shotgun ammunition typically has significant variations in live cartridge length from one manufacturer and/or load to the next. The spectrum of length variation for rifle and pistol ammunition can typically be measured in the hundredths of an inch (0.0X0″) if not the thousands of an inch (0.00X″). The spectrum of shotgun ammunition can in some cases be measured at over an inch (X.00″) of length difference from one manufacture to the next. And more typical in the tenths of an inch (0.X00″).
Manufacturers typically call out shotgun ammunition in ¼ inch (0.25″) or ½ inch (0.5″) increments, for example, 2¾″, 3″, and 3½″. Typically, if a rifle or pistol cartridge has this much difference in length, it becomes a totally different round. For example; 9 mm Luger vs. .380 Auto, .45 Auto vs. .45 GAP, .22 Magnum vs. .22 Long Rifle vs. .22 Short, 8 mm Mauser (7.92×57) vs. 7.92×33 Kurz. Different shotgun models can typically fire everything it is chambered to (in a particular gauge) and all cartridges of shorter length. For example, the typical 12 ga shotgun that is chambered in 3″ can fire both 3″ and 2¾″ cartridges. The typical rifle or pistol model cannot do this safely and/or reliably, the few exceptions not being relevant to this discussion.
Although shotgun cartridges are typically called out in nominal ¼ inch length increments, they still greatly vary from one manufacturer and/or load to the next. Typically, the length call out is the length of the empty casing or hull. Typically, when it is loaded it loses length from crimping or rolling the casing/hull. Depending on the manufacturer and/or load, a live 2¾″ cartridge can measure less than 2.25″ in length or it can measure more than 2.55″ in length.
Another difference is that the typical shotgun ammunition is a rimmed cartridge. Most pistol and rifle ammunition has evolved into a rimless cartridge, the exceptions, again, not being relevant to this discussion. The feeding of a double stack of rimless rifle or pistol cartridges in a box magazine does not typically encounter the problem of misaligned rims.
Box magazines achieve reliability by repeatability. A typical box magazine fed weapon uses an ammunition cartridge that is very consistent in length. This prevents front to back movement and misalignment of the cartridges in the magazine under forceful movement or recoil of firing the weapon. Magazine fed weapons have an optimal position of the next cartridge to load from the top of the magazine. For example, if the cartridge is not contained or restrained to prevent longitudinal (forward and aft) movement, the round can be positioned too far forward in the magazine as it is presented for chambering, causing misalignment, or can prematurely extract from the magazine. This results in a high probability of jamming during chambering of the cartridge. For typical shotgun cartridges, it can also allow the rim of a cartridge below the top cartridge to bind the rim of the top cartridge and cause a jam (failure to feed).
A box magazine for a shotgun presents a greater challenge because of the rim and shotgun cartridges' wide range of loaded length. For this reason, there are very few box magazine fed shotguns. In the past, box magazines for shotguns have addressed this issue in only two ways, both of which include an upwardly angled stack provided by the follower. Either the cartridge was contained by holding the cartridge by its rim for the length of the magazine, preventing longitudinal movement (particularly forward movement of lower cartridges) and misalignment of cartridges and their rims. Or, it has restrained longitudinal movement (and resulting misalignment) by walls that bear against the head and forward end of the cartridge. This latter solution eliminates the use of all cartridges other than a very small portion of the spectrum of cartridge lengths. This includes many cartridges of the same nominal (call out) length. For example, not all 2¾″ cartridges would fit and/or feed reliably with this method. This is not very feasible considering the wide range of lengths of shotgun cartridges. Moreover, the shooter who is very accustomed to the versatility in the typical shotgun model to except these different lengths of cartridges does not find this acceptable.
Putting two columns of rimmed shotgun cartridges side by side makes it impossible to contain the cartridges by holding their rims in alignment. The side of the rim toward the transverse center width of the magazine (inboard side) meets the column of cartridges beside it and cannot be contained. Therefore, longitudinal movement (particularly forward movement of a lower cartridge) and misalignment and binding of rims are possible—and likely.
The present invention provides a new and better way of addressing this problem. A double stack box magazine may taper to a single stack feed at the top. In the double-stack portion, the rounds are allowed to shift forward and rearward without regard to head or rim position. Once single stack geometry is met, an angled surface on the inside of the magazine body catches both sides of the rim of the cartridge and pulls it back to the rear of the magazine, allowing proper alignment and preventing the rims from binding during feed.
This allows a very large variation of cartridge lengths, both within or beyond the same nominal length, to be fed reliably from the same magazine. That is, not only can cartridges of varying actual lengths within the same nominal size (such as 2¾″) due to variation in manufacturer and/or load be mixed in the same magazine, cartridges of different nominal length (length call out, such as 3″) can be mixed in the same magazine (such as 2¾″ and 3″, up to the maximum chamber length of the shotgun) without loss of feed reliability. Because only one side of a cartridge rim at a time can engage a slot or groove on the inside surface of the magazine body when the shells are in alternating columns, if the front-to-rear dimension of the magazine body is sized to accept shells of varying lengths, the rims cannot reliably be held in alignment against the recoil forces of firing the shotgun or other vibration, sudden movement, or impact. The interior angled surface guides the rim of the uppermost cartridges to the rear, no matter how the shell has become situated during its travel up the magazine body, and places the rim of upper cartridges in front of the rim of the next cartridge below it.
Alternatively, an insert can be used to take up the excess opening in the front of the magazine. This is less desirable because many different thicknesses of inserts would be needed to meet the same length capabilities as the primary. The followers would have to be switched out along with the inserts to account for the front to back shortening and lengthening of the magazines' interior. This would also sacrifice the ability to load 2¾″ and 3″ shotgun shells in the same magazine and would be less convenient or likely would not be well accepted by the shooter to have to swap out parts in the magazine.
Another feature of the present design is a follower that is guided in front and rear (rather than lateral) tracks. This allows for a short, one-piece follower that maintains a consistent location as well as consistent force. A one-piece side tilting follower design, like used in many double stack pistol magazines, is possible, but does not offer the same consistency. Any inconsistencies can make jamming more likely. A side tilting design would have to tilt to the side as the follower transitioned between the single and double stack portions of the magazine, while at the same time maintaining the location and angle of the shells resting against the changing angles of the follower.
Like reference numerals are used to indicate like parts throughout the various figures of the drawing, wherein:
Referring to the various figures of the drawing and first to
A coil spring 20 is inserted through the bottom opening 26 behind or along with the follower 18. The spring 20 may have a rectangular shape (as shown), may be a cylindrical coil (not shown), or a combination of both, and its width or diameter may be tapered in cross-section along its length. In the present invention, it has been found useful to have a floor plate guide 22 with protrusions 30 or other means for holding the spring 20 in a properly centered position at the lower end. The floor plate guide 22 is inserted into the bottom opening 26 behind or along with the spring 20 and then the floor plate 24 is slid into a closed position by engaging the lateral grooves 32 on lateral rails 34, which are adjacent the bottom opening 26 of the magazine body 12.
For purposes of illustration only, the magazine 10 shown and described herein is adapted to fit a Kalashnikov-pattern Saiga 12 semi-automatic shotgun, manufactured in Russia by Izhmash. Accordingly, the upper end 36 of the magazine body 12 is configured to properly engage a detachable coupling with a magazine well in such a shotgun (not shown). Accordingly, the illustrated embodiment includes a attached metallic member 14 that snaps in place adjacent the upper end 36 of the magazine body 12 to provide durable feed lips 16 in accordance with the existing designs found in a single-stack, smaller capacity box magazine for such a shotgun. Alternatively, feed lips may be provided integrally with the magazine body 12 either from the same material or by encapsulating/over-molding a metallic member.
Referring now to
As discussed in the background section above, reliably feeding shotgun shells in a box magazine presents challenges not found in handling rifle and pistol cartridges. Generally, a shotgun is expected to be able to handle and fire shells of the specified chamber length or shorter. Moreover, shells of any standard nominal length may vary considerably in actual length. Prior art box magazines rely on the length of each cartridge being substantially identical, within a very small acceptable tolerance and/or use of a significantly angled follower. Also as described above, prior single-stack box magazines for shotgun shells address this challenge by engaging the rim of each cartridge on both sides within a narrow track or groove that maintained rims of subsequent cartridges in an “ordered” position and use a significantly angled follower to prevent binding caused by frontward/rearward shift to provide reliable feeding into a position to be stripped away by the shotgun's reciprocating bolt.
Referring now to
Adjacent the rear edge of the magazine body 12 is a relatively wide rim clearance channel 48. A rear edge 50 of the channel 48 is defined along the rearward interior surface of the magazine body 12. A forward edge 52 of the channel 48 is defined by the lateral interior surface 46. In preferred form, however, the forward edge 52 is positioned to accommodate even the shortest nominal or actual length shotgun shells 44 without confronting the rim.
The overall front-to-rear interior dimension 56 should be configured to accept the longest expected overall length of a shotgun cartridge 44 to be used in the magazine 10 and its associated shotgun (not shown). The front-to-rear dimension 58 of the rim guide channel 48 optimally may be selected such that the rim of a shotgun shell of the shortest expected overall length will remain between rear and forward edges 50, 52 of the clearance channel 48 when a shell is shifted forward to the point of being against or near the forward interior surface 60 of the magazine body 12.
It can be appreciated by comparison of the views in
The follower 18 has forward and rearward guide rails 62, 64, which engage forward and rearward follower guide channels 66, 68 on interior front and rear surfaces 60, 50 of the magazine body 12. The follower guide rails 62, 64 have sufficient vertical length to prevent lateral tipping of the follower 18 as it travels along the length of the magazine body 12. The forward follower guide rail 62 is shorter in vertical dimension than the rear follower guide rail 64 in the illustrated design to accommodate the curvature of the magazine body 12 and the position of a front magazine catch at the upper end 36 of the magazine 10.
As best illustrated in
As cartridges 44 are stripped away from the upper end 36 of the magazine 10, cartridges 44 situated lower in the magazine 10 are moved from the double-stacked portion 42 into the transition portion 40, where their relative vertical position increases as their relative lateral position decreases. This is best illustrated in
As cartridges 44 continue to be moved upwardly, through the transition portion 40, they enter the upper or neck portion 38 of the magazine 10, in which the cartridges 44 become vertically aligned in a single column with opposing edges of their rims both engaged in both opposing rim clearance channels 48. In a preferred form, the vertical length of the neck portion 38 is kept to the minimum length necessary to engage the magazine well (not shown) of the selected shotgun, so that the combined transition portion 40 and double-stacked portion 42 of the magazine 10 may be maximized, thereby maximizing the capacity of the magazine 10.
Referring now in particular to
As cartridges 44 are stripped from the upper end 36 of the magazine 10, cartridges at a lower position, such as that shown as 44c, migrate upwardly. As the rim 80 is engaged on both lateral sides, it is drawn rearwardly by the angled transition edge 76 to a position generally represented by cartridge 44b. At this point, even if the rims 80 of the cartridges 44 are “misaligned” as shown by 44b and 44c in
As used herein, “forward” or “front” refers to the muzzle or discharge end or direction of a firearm, distal from the user. “Rearward” or “rear” refers to end of the firearm proximal to the user and opposite the direction of a projectile discharge. “Up” or “upward” can, but does not necessarily, mean a vertically upward direction. Instead, these terms are meant to describe the direction of or movement toward the mouth or feed end of the magazine, even if a particular firearm utilizes a top or side loading magazine configuration or if the firearm may be mounted in different orientations.
The illustrated embodiment was chosen and described to provide the best disclosure of the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by any allowed claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally and equitably entitled. The drawings and preferred embodiments do not and are not intended to limit the ordinary meaning of the claims and their fair and broad interpretation in any way.
This application claims priority to my U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/383,848 filed Sep. 17, 2010 entitled Double Stack Box Magazine for Shotgun Cartridges.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
465339 | Browning | Dec 1891 | A |
3345771 | Silsby | Oct 1967 | A |
4589218 | Teppa | May 1986 | A |
4672760 | Chesnut et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4777752 | Howard | Oct 1988 | A |
4790094 | Chesnut et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4805333 | Doria et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4862620 | Chesnut et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4864758 | Crossman | Sep 1989 | A |
5014456 | Kurtz et al. | May 1991 | A |
5056252 | Velezis | Oct 1991 | A |
5099595 | Chesnut et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127178 | Sinclair | Jul 1992 | A |
5235769 | Stead et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5367810 | Stead et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375359 | Chesnut et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5755052 | Keeney | May 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2446007 | Jul 2008 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120066950 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61383848 | Sep 2010 | US |