The present invention relates generally to ground opener units for an agricultural implement and, more particularly, to an assembly for automatically and continually adjusting the down pressure applied to a disc in response to changes in soil conditions to maintain the disc at a relatively constant penetration depth so that the disc cuts an elongated trench in the soil at a substantially constant depth.
A planter generally consists of a toolbar that may be hitched to a tractor and a number of disc opener units mounted to the toolbar. The disc opener units have a disc or coulter that cuts a furrow into a field and a seed tube that deposits seed into the furrow. Some disc opener units are equipped with an additional tube for depositing fertilizer into the furrow. The depth at which the disc penetrates into the field and cuts the furrow is controlled by a gauge wheel. The position of the gauge wheel is typically set by rotating a lever or control area to one of a series of depth setting positions. While the gauge wheel sets the penetration depth for the disc, a down pressure system, which typically includes a hydraulic cylinder and or spring, applies a down force on the disc to ensure that the disc penetrates into the ground. For most planters, the amount of down force can be adjusted by the operator to accommodate different soil conditions.
Notwithstanding the ability to vary the down force to changing soil conditions, many operators are unsure as to the appropriate down pressure setting for a given soil condition. As a result, many such operators will set the down pressure setting such that an excessive amount of down force is applied and leave the setting unchanged. Thus, unless extreme ground conditions are present, there will always be sufficient down force applied to the disc for the disc to penetrate to the desired cutting depth.
Constantly operating the planter with the down pressure system set to the maximal down pressure setting however can have detrimental effects. More specifically, since the excess down force is transmitted through the gauge wheel assembly, the gauge wheel, control lever, and/or gauge wheel hearings may fail premature if the down pressure system is always set to apply an excessive amount of down pressure.
Thus, there is a need for a down pressure control system that places less stress on the gauge wheel assembly while also applying a down force on the disc that accommodates a varying range of soil conditions.
The present invention is directed to a down pressure control system that varies the amount of down force that is applied on a disc by a down pressure cylinder in substantially real-time as soil conditions change. As soil conditions change, the strain placed on gauge wheel assembly will also change. This change is measured by a load sensor and is used to reactively change the amount of down force that is applied by the down pressure cylinder. The load sensor, which may be a strain gauge for example, senses the strain placed on the gauge wheel assembly during a change in soil conditions. If the soil conditions soften, the down force applied by the down pressure cylinder will initially stress the gauge wheel assembly as the gauge wheel counters the down force applied. In such an instance, the load center detects the increased strain and provides the information to a controller that provides appropriate control signals to a valve that controls the flow and/or pressure of hydraulic fluid to the down pressure cylinder so that the amount of down force applied to the disc is reduced. On the other hand if the soil conditions harden, the down pressure will be insufficient to drive the disc to the desired penetration depth and a corresponding strain will be measured by the load center. Appropriate control signals will then be communicated to the valve to change the flow of hydraulic fluid so as to increase the amount of down force applied.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a down pressure control system that responds automatically to changes in soil conditions to change the amount of down force or pressure that is applied to a disc.
It is another object of the invention to provide a cutting depth monitoring system for a disc opener unit that determines a real-time cutting depth of the disc opener unit and adjusts the amount of down force being applied to the disc opener unit to maintain the cutting depth at a preset level.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a down pressure control system that does not require an operator to set a desired amount of down force to be applied to a disc opener unit.
It is another object of the invention to provide a down pressure control system that optimizes the amount of down force applied on a disc opener unit.
Other objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the present invention, are given by way of illustration and not of limitation. Many changes and modifications may be made within the scope of the present invention without departing from the spirit thereof, and the invention includes all such modifications.
Preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals represent like parts throughout.
In the drawings:
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
The parallel linkage 28 is also coupled to a toolbar mount 48 that is operative to couple the seeding unit 20 to a toolbar 50 of the seeder 16. A hydraulic cylinder 52 is pivotal coupled to the toolbar mount 48 and the mount arm 32 by a bracket 54. The cylinder 52 is operative to apply a downward pressure on the disc 22 to force the disc 22 to penetrate the seeding surface. The depth at which the disc 22 cuts into the planting surface is variably set by a gauge wheel 56 and a cooperating gauge wheel arm 58 having a handle 60. The arm 58 is coupled to a crankshaft 62 that extends through the center of the disc 22. The gauge wheel arm 58 is held in place by teeth (not shown) that interface with a mating fan shaped member 64, which includes a series of notches 66 that individually define a different depth the disc 22 can be set via positioning of the gauge wheel arm 58.
In addition to setting the depth at which the disc 22 cuts into the planting surface, the gauge wheel 56 keeps the outer surface of the disc 22 generally clear of mud and debris. A scraper blade 63 is mounted opposite the depth gauge wheel 56 is designed to remove dirt, mud, and other debris from the inner surface of the disc 22.
The seeding unit 20 shown in
The cutting member 74 cuts into the sidewall of the furrow such that the ledge is offset horizontally and vertically from the fertilizer trench, i.e., bottom of the furrow. In this regard, the seed is deposited at a position that is spaced horizontally and vertically from the fertilizer that is dropped into the fertilizer trench. As noted above, it is generally preferred to place seed and fertilizer into a furrow with stratification between the fertilizer and the seed.
In one preferred embodiment, the cutting member 74 is angled to lift the soil as the cutting member 74 is urged through the sidewall of the furrow. Thus, as the disc 22 and the cutting member 74 cut through the planting surface, the soil is temporarily displaced and lifted to form trenches for the deposition of fertilizer or seed. However, when disc 22 and the cutting member 74 pass, the soil will tend to fall back onto itself and effectively fill-in the furrow and thus the fertilizer and seed trenches. The press wheel 36, which trails the seed boot 26, then packs the fertilizer and the seed. Alternately, the cutting member 74 may be angled downward to force the soil down onto the fertilizer before the seed is deposited onto the seed bed.
In one preferred embodiment, a deflector tab 76 extends from the backside of the seed tube 72. The deflector tab 76 generally provides two separate functions. First, the deflector tab 76 is angled as is the lower ends of the seed tube 72 and the cutting member 74. With this angled orientation, the deflector tab 76 is operative to encourage seed toward the seed trench, Second, because of its proximity to the seed tube 72, the deflector tab 76 reduces the ingress of soil and debris into the seed tube 72 during roll back of the planting unit 20.
As noted above, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 52 sets the amount of down pressure that is applied on the disc 22. In a preferred method of operation, a user rotates the gauge wheel arm 58 to a desired depth setting at which the disc 22 is to cut a furrow in the planting surface. The down pressure applied by the cylinder 52, together with the weight of the planting unit 20, forces the disc 22 into the planting surface so that the furrow is cut at the user selected depth. As described above, conventionally, many users, independent of the gauge wheel setting, have a maximum down force applied on the disc. Users will often do this because they are not sure how much down pressure is needed. However, continued excessive down pressure can cause premature failure of the gauge wheel, the depth setting mechanisms, and/or gauge wheel bearings.
As such, in accordance with a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a planter unit 20 having a strain gauge or load cell 78 mounted to the gauge wheel arm 58. The information gathered from the strain gauge 78 is used control the flow of hydraulic fluid to or from the hydraulic cylinder 52 and thus the amount of down force applied on the disc 22. In this regard, the amount of down force applied by the hydraulic cylinder can be controlled substantially in real-time to maintain a desired seed depth without overstressing the gauge wheel and its related components.
Referring now to
As referenced above, the present invention is applicable with different types of agricultural implements, such as seeders, planters, and the like.
In operation, an operator sets the gauge wheel 56 to a desired seed depth and sets the down pressure to a desired value based on experience and field conditions. As the seeder 16 is initially lowered into the field engaging position and the planter units 20, 102 begin to cut furrows into the planting surface, the stain gauge 78 provides feedback to the CPU 88 corresponding to the deformation of the gauge wheel arm 58. Generally, if the amount of down pressure applied by the cylinder 52 (or 106) is excessive, the down pressure will try to force the disc 22 farther into the planting surface resulting in deformation, e.g., slight bending, of the gauge wheel arm 58, which will be detected by the strain gauge 78. On the other hand, if the down pressure applied by the cylinder 52 (or 106) is insufficient to hold the disc 22 at the desired furrow cutting depth, a reverse bending of the gauge wheel arm 58 will occur and be detected by the strain gauge 78. If the amount of down pressure is appropriate, a minimum threshold of deformation of the strain gauge arm 58 will occur. In this regard, as the disc 22 is pulled through the planting surface, strain measurements are taken and provided to the CPU, which in turn compares the measured strain values to a range of “no-action” values. That is, if the amount of strain falls within that range, the CPU will not effectuate any changes to the amount of pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 52 (or 106). This would be for events such as when the gauge wheel rolls over an obstacle such as a rock. However, if the stain measurements are outside the range of “no-action” values, the CPU will cause an increase or decrease in pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 52 (or 106) to vary the amount of down pressure the cylinder 52 (or 106) applies on disc 22. The range of “no action” values preferably has a width that avoids constant changing of the hydraulic pressure, but avoids undesirable over-force or under-force on the disc 22.
In another preferred implementation, by default, the hydraulic cylinder 52 (or 106) is set to provide a maximum down pressure on the disc 22. Strain measurements are then taken as the disc 22 is pulled through the planting surface and hydraulic pressure is reduced from the maximum level as appropriate based on feedback provided by the strain gauge. It is believed that initially setting the down pressure to a maximal level and then reducing the down pressure as needed provides two advantages. First, it ensures that there is initially enough down pressure for the disc 22 to cut through the planting surface to the desired cutting depth. Second, reducing the down pressure can be done relatively quickly to provide a quickened response time to achieve an optimized down pressure setting for a given soil condition.
Many changes and modifications could be made to the invention without departing from the spirit thereof. The scope of these changes will become apparent from the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3233680 | Arzoian et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3394474 | Rockwell | Jul 1968 | A |
4176721 | Poggemiller et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4355688 | Hamm et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4760806 | Bigbee et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4909331 | Defranco | Mar 1990 | A |
5081942 | Clark et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5234060 | Carter | Aug 1993 | A |
5499683 | Bassett | Mar 1996 | A |
5562165 | Janelle et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5709271 | Bassett | Jan 1998 | A |
5727638 | Woodrich et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5887664 | Whalen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6032593 | Wendling et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6119786 | Creger et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6386127 | Prarie et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389999 | Duello | May 2002 | B1 |
6644223 | Prarie et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6701857 | Jensen et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6827029 | Wendte | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7191715 | Wendte et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7360495 | Martin | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7481278 | Pomedlie et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7540333 | Bettin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7814847 | Schilling et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8036797 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8275525 | Kowalchuk et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20100010667 | Sauder et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100180808 | Liu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2549371 | Nov 2007 | CA |
4121218 | Mar 1992 | DE |
19945853 | Mar 2001 | DE |
0153102 | Aug 1985 | EP |
0159948 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0314640 | May 1989 | EP |
0372901 | Jun 1990 | EP |
2351354 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2015185 | Aug 1990 | ES |
1393243 | Mar 1965 | FR |
2681213 | Mar 1993 | FR |
WO2009042238 | Apr 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ahokas, Jukka, “The Effect of Ground Profile and Plough Gauge Wheel on Ploughing Work with a Mounted Plough,” Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Vakola Study Report 69, 1994, 92 pages. |
Choi, C. H., et al. “Automatic Depth Control System for Tractor Implement,” 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190327882 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15908947 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16508613 | US | |
Parent | 12820759 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 15908947 | US |