Patent Application
20120017510
The present invention relates to the improved stability of downdraft gasifiers. Disclosed are techniques to level biomass at the top of the bed, to inject oxidant uniformly throughout the cross section of the bed, and to withdraw ash and char uniformly through the grate. These techniques can be used individually, or preferably, all in combination to provide a greatly improved gasifier stability and controllability.
Downdraft gasifiers are well known and have been used for over 100 years. In the arrangement the biomass and oxidant both flow in a downward direction. The use of a downdraft gasifier results in a gas which is very low in tar concentration as the syngas passes through a char zone towards the lower section of the bed where significant tar destruction occurs. As the produced syngas requires minimal further clean up this type of gasifier has been found useful as an onboard gasifier for vehicle use during times of fuel shortages.
The downdraft gasifier also has a number of disadvantages. As the bed is supported on a grate it is possible for the biomass to plug the grate or bed, resulting in a non-even distribution (a maldistribution) of air through the bed, excessive pressure drop across the depth of the bed, and even the need to shut down the gasifier to clear the grate and the bed.
The biomass may also form bridges or channels, thereby forming low pressure drop “short-cuts” for the oxidant, which result in lower bed combustion, weak gas production and possibly increased rates of tar production.
Another problem is that the flame front can be difficult to stabilize. Depending on operating conditions, the flaming pyrolysis front may migrate to the top of the bed, resulting in unstable operation and/or upper combustion, again resulting in the need to shut down the system. One downdraft gasifier, namely, the Imbert design, overcomes this last problem through radial injection of oxidant only towards the lower bed. The flame front is thus naturally stabilized there—it cannot travel upwards due to a lack of oxidant above the point of injection. However, this technique lacks the ability to be scaled to higher throughputs due to a limitation in how far into the bed the radially directed jets can cause oxidant penetration. In effect, the upper sizing is dictated by how far the oxidant can penetrate into the bed.
Downdraft gasifiers and a special grate for downdraft gasifiers are disclosed.
One downdraft gasifier has a body, an air intake toward the top of the body to allow air into the body, a fuel feed inlet toward the top of the body to allow the controlled introduction of fuel into the gasifier, a grate located inside the body and below the fuel feed inlet to support a bed of the fuel, an in-bed air distribution system comprising a plurality of pipes with nozzles therein, located inside the body and above the grate, to inject air within the bed, a rotating paddle, located inside the body and above the grate, to stir the bed, a gas exit port located below the grate, and an ash removal port toward the bottom of the body.
Another downdraft gasifier has a body, an air intake toward the top of the body to allow air into the body, a fuel feed inlet located toward the top of the body to allow the introduction of fuel into the gasifier, an air inlet located toward the top of the body to allow the introduction of air into the gasifier, and a special grate located inside the body and below the fuel feed inlet and the air inlet to support a bed of the fuel, a motor to move a specified part of the grate in a specified manner, a rotating paddle, located inside the body and above the grate, to stir the bed, a gas exit port located below the grate, and an ash removal port toward the bottom of the body.
The special grate has: (1) a plurality of substantially parallel elongate plate sections, each plate section having an elongate dimension and comprising a horizontal component and a vertical component, the vertical component being substantially centered on the horizontal component, the horizontal components being separated from each other by a first predetermined distance, the vertical components being separated from each other by a second predetermined distance, and the elongate dimension of the plate sections being oriented in a first predetermined direction, (2) a spacer to surround the plate sections, and joined to the plate sections, to form a plate structure, (3) a plurality of substantially parallel elongate canopy sections, each canopy section having an elongate dimension and having a predetermined shape, the canopy sections being separated from each other by a third predetermined distance at the top of the predetermined shape and being separated from each other by a fourth predetermined distance at the bottom of the predetermined shape, the elongate dimension of the canopy sections also being oriented in said first predetermined direction, and (4) a plurality of bars joined to the canopy sections to form a canopy structure. The canopy structure being directly above the plate structure. A motor moves the predetermined one of said canopy structure or said plate structure in a direction substantially perpendicular to said first predetermined direction, the other structure of said canopy structure or said plate structure is fixed in place.
The stability of a downdraft gasifier is thus dramatically improved and the gasifier systems have substantially higher energy output rates than those of traditional gasifier designs. A more even bed and air flow are produced, and the gasification process occurs in a similar manner throughout the full cross sectional area of the gasifier bed.
The upper paddle evenly distributes biomass across the entire cross sectional area of the gasifier bed, an in-bed oxidant distributor with a plurality of oxidant injection nozzles supplies oxidant throughout the entire cross sectional area of the bed, and an active grate mechanism allows a metered withdrawal of the lower level ash char mixture from the bed.
The various improvements disclosed herein can be used individually or in combination.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become apparent and be better understood by reference to the following description of several embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The examples set out herein illustrate several embodiments of the invention but should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
An upper paddle evenly distributes biomass across the entire cross sectional area of the gasifier bed, an in-bed oxidant distributor with a plurality of oxidant injection nozzles supplies oxidant throughout the entire cross sectional area of the bed, and an active grate mechanism allows a metered withdrawal of the lower level ash char mixture from the bed.
A more even bed and air flow are thus produced, and the gasification process occurs in a similar manner throughout the full cross sectional area of the gasifier bed. As a result, the stability of a downdraft gasifier is dramatically improved, and the gasifier has a substantially higher energy output rate than those of traditional design.
In a downdraft gasifier both the oxidant and biomass travel in a downward direction. Often the biomass is supported on a porous grate which supports the biomass bed whilst allowing smaller particles of char and ash as well as the produced syngas to pass from the gasification chamber into a lower chamber. The technique produces a syngas with lower tar concentrations than other updraft, sidedraft or fluidized bed arrangements. This is due to a hot char reduction zone being present towards the lower section of the bed and wherein significant tar destruction reactions occur.
For a downdraft gasifier to operate with optimum or near optimum performance and with improved stability the gasifier bed must be operating with similar heat and mass transfer and kinetic characteristics throughout the entire cross section of the bed. This occurs when:
(i) The pressure drop from the top of the bed to the bottom of the bed is the same throughout the entire cross section of the bed;
(ii) The height of the bed is the same everywhere;
(iii) The flame is stabilized within the bed;
(iv) The air is distributed in such a way that each cross sectional area of the bed receives the same volumetric flow rate of oxidant; and
(v) Any baffling or outlet piping below the grate does not promote preferential flow within the bed.
As previously mentioned, one cause of instability and non-optimum gasifier performance can result from a maldistribution of airflow through the gasifier bed. This is particularly important when airflow enters the gasification unit above the bed. The Ergun equation can be used to predict pressure drop across a packed bed. In the equation it can be seen that the pressure drop is directly proportional to the bed height, where the bed height is defined as the height from the grate level to the top of the biomass. If part of the bed is slightly lower than the surrounding bed air flow will preferentially be through the bed at the low spot. The localized increased air flow will promote faster kinetics in that region, thus increasing the rate of biomass consumption in the cross sectional area where the low point exists. This will then result in the bed falling more rapidly there, causing the low point to become even lower. This results in a positive feedback cycle and is the initiation point of the formation of channels within the bed. Maldistribution of air can result in higher carbon dioxide production rates and higher localized temperatures within the cross sectional area containing the channel.
A 50″ inner diameter (ID) stratified gasifier with off center 12″ twin flap valves for biomass addition and a 6″ central air oxidant inlet was used to gasify ¼″ outer diameter (OD) wood pellets. A tangential laser system (10B) was used to indicate bed height and set to maintain the bed height at 24″ from the top of the grate (9) to the top of the bed. A laser system is not preferred because dust created when new material is added may temporarily give an erroneous height indication. Preferably, an infrared or microwave sensor would be used. Even more preferably, a rotary paddle switch (10A) would be used. An exemplary rotary paddle switch is a K-TEK Model KP Rotating Paddle Switch. Other rotary paddle switches may also be used. The signal from the laser was fed into a PLC system (28) which fed an auger system (not shown) to load the hopper (20) above the flap valves (2) and then initiate the flap valve sequence. A blower (21) was used to create a vacuum on the gasifier outlet to promote an air flow through the central air inlet (3). The gasifier was initially brought up to temperature using charcoal as a fuel. Other fuels and techniques may also be used to bring the gasifier up to the desired operating temperature. Once the gasifier was up to the desired operating temperature (e.g., 600 to 1200° C.) the wood pellets were introduced into the system. The blower was set to withdraw 300 SCFM (standard cubic feet per minute) of syngas from the system. Initially, the gasifier operated in a stable manner, with temperatures and syngas composition in the normal range. After 50 minutes of operation localized “hot spots” began to form within the bed. The syngas quality began to reduce whilst the carbon dioxide production rate increased. The blower was turned off and the system was allowed to cool. After the system had cooled, the bed was examined and localized low spots in the bed were identified. The grate under these low spots was found to have sustained thermal damage due to localized combustion occurring there.
The same test as described above was conducted utilizing wood chips as the fuel source. The system was found to be more unstable than the test described in Example 1. After the test a large peak was found under the biomass feed point. Again damage had occurred to the grate under low points in the bed.
A rotating paddle arrangement (5) was installed in the 50″ ID gasifier described above. The system was externally driven using an electrical motor (22) and gearbox (23) arrangement. The motor was powered from a variable frequency drive (VFD) (not shown, but could be part of PLC (28)) to allow the effect of rotational speed to be investigated. The paddle (5) consisted of a solid 1″ 304 stainless steel square bar which was connected via a yoke arrangement (not shown) to the drive shaft (not separately numbered). The paddle was arranged such that the top of the paddle was 1″ below the level of the bed indicator laser (10). The paddle was set to rotate at approximately 1 RPM. The test described in Example 1 was repeated. The system was found to operate in a stable manner with consistent radial temperature profiles. A strong syngas was produced which showed little variation over the entire period (50 minutes) of the test. The system was operated for four hours after which time the flame front was found to have migrated to the top of the bed. The system had then become top stabilized, after which point the gas composition became oscillatory and related to feed addition times.
A second cause of instability inherent to stratified downdraft gasifiers results from the tendency of the flame front to migrate within the bed. If the flame front migrates toward the top of the bed the oxidant to biomass ratio there allows for combustion of the biomass products there. The carbon dioxide and water can be reduced in the lower sections to produce syngas. When the system becomes “top stabilized” a large amount of “fines” (fine particular matter or ash) can be rapidly accumulated towards the top of the bed. These fines can result in a rapid increase in the pressure drop across the bed. For processes fed in a semi-batch method, large oscillations in gas chemistry, composition and tar loadings were seen to be synchronized to biomass addition times.
In a preferred embodiment the distributor consists of 5 to 7 concentric rings (33) fed from four diametrically opposed feed addition points (32). 220 5/16″ OD holes (31) are drilled into the rings. At a flow rate of 1000 SCFM the pressure drop through the distributor is less than 0.3 pounds per square inch. The nozzles can be orientated to direct the gas directly downwards or the nozzle can be inclined to direct the gas at a slight angle from directly downward. A mixture of orientations can also be used.
In the schematic of
A third inherent cause of instability in downdraft gasifiers is related to unstable flow of ash and char on and through the grate (9). If material does not flow through the grate in an even manner the particle size distribution across the cross sectional area at a height just above the grate will become very broad. Cross sectional areas with low rates of biomass passage through the grate will tend to accumulate a large amount of fines. Areas in the cross-sections which exhibit smaller than median particle sizes will have a reduced flow of oxidant there due to an increase in pressure drop through the fine material. The loss of oxidant flow will reduce the rate of biomass consumption in these regions. The result of the reduced cross sectional area for flow results in an increase in pressure drop across the system and can eventually result in the need to shut down the system down due to a plugged bed.
Preferably, the canopy sections (12) have a triangular shape and the plate sections (14) are generally in the shape of an inverted “T”. Variations from these shapes are acceptable provided they meet the functional requirements discussed above.
An advantage of this arrangement is that the grate can be actively controlled to move a desired volume of ash material evenly from throughout the cross section of the bed. The actuation frequency can be controlled by temperature or pressure drop measurements from sensors (25) or related to the frequency of feed addition sequences. The grate also allows the gasifier to be operated in a char production mode. Here char is purposely withdrawn from the bed at a more rapid frequency than that forced by the process. This is a desirable mode when a source of activated carbon is required or when carbon is to be added to land or a landfill as a means of sequestering carbon. In this case the whole process can operate with a negative carbon footprint.
A 50″ ID stratified gasifier with off center 12′ twin flap valves for biomass addition and a 6″ central air oxidant inlet was used to gasify ¼″ OD wood pellets. A tangential laser system (10) was used to indicate bed height and set to maintain the bed height at 24″ from the top of the grate to the top of the bed. The signal from the laser was fed into a PLC system (28) which fed an auger system (not shown) to load the hopper ((20) in
In an alternative embodiment, the canopy section is fixed and the motor moves the plate sections.
The stability of a downdraft gasifier can thus be dramatically improved using one or more of the techniques disclosed herein. The techniques can also be used to produce gasifier systems with substantially higher energy output rates than those of traditional design. When all of the improvements are implemented a more even bed and air flow is produced, resulting in even gasification which occurs in a similar manner across the full cross sectional area of the gasifier bed.
The present invention enhances the quality of the environment by reducing the quantity of material going to landfills or that might otherwise simply be burned, reduces green house gas emission by more efficiently using materials to produce syngas, and conserves energy resources by providing a useful product, syngas, from materials that might otherwise be simply burned or tossed into a landfill to dispose of them.
The techniques or parts of the techniques can be applied to a number of different gasifier designs and therefore the examples set out herein illustrate several embodiments but should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Although various embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail herein, other variations may occur to those reading this disclosure without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is to be limited only by the claims.
This patent application claims the priority of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/296,155 entitled “Downdraft Gasifier With Improved Stability”, filed Jan. 19, 2010, by Dr. Philip D. Leveson.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61296155 | Jan 2010 | US |
