Downhole activation system that assigns and retrieves identifiers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6283227
  • Patent Number
    6,283,227
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 27, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 4, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A tool activating system includes multiple control units coupled to activate devices in a tool string positioned in a well. A processor is capable of communicating with the control units to send commands to the control units as well as to retrieve information (such as unique identifiers and status) of the control units. Selective activation of the control units may be performed based on the retrieved information. Further, defective control units or devices may be bypassed or skipped over.
Description




BACKGROUND




The invention relates to addressable downhole activation systems.




To complete a well, one or more sets of perforations may be created downhole using perforating guns. Such perforations allow fluid from producing zones to flow into the wellbore for production to the surface. To create perforations in multiple reservoirs or in multiple sections of a reservoir, multi-gun strings are typically used. A multi-gun string may be lowered to a first position to fire a first gun or bank of guns, then moved to a second position to fire a second gun or bank of guns, and so forth.




Selectable switches are used to control the firing sequence of the guns in the string. Simple devices include dual diode switches for two-gun systems and concussion actuated mechanical switches or contacts for multi-gun systems. A concussion actuated mechanical switch is activated by the force from a detonation. Guns are sequentially armed starting from the lowest gun using the force of the detonation to set a switch to complete the circuit to the gun above and to break connection to the gun below. The switches are used to step through the guns or charges from the bottom up to select which gun or charge to fire. However, if a switch in the string is defective, then the remaining guns above the defective gun become unusable. In the worst case situation, a defective switch at the bottom of the multi-string gun would render the entire string unusable.




Other conventional perforating systems do not allow for the confirmation of the identity of which gun in the string has been selected. The identity of the selected gun is inferred from the number of cycles in the counting process. As a result, it is possible to fire the wrong gun unless precautions are followed, including a taking physical measurement, such as a voltage drop or amount of current to determine which gun has been selected before firing. This, however, adds complexity to the firing sequence. Furthermore, such precautionary measures are typically not reliable.




SUMMARY




In general, according to one embodiment, the invention features a system to activate devices in a tool string. The system includes control units that are adapted to communicate with a central controller. Switches are controllable by corresponding control units to enable activation of the devices.




Other features will become apparent from the following description and from the claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a diagram of a tool string incorporating an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram of a control unit according to an embodiment used in the tool string of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a flow diagram of software executed in a system to control activation of devices according to one embodiment.





FIG. 4

is a block diagram of a control system according to another embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 5

is a flow diagram of software executed in a system to control activation of devices according to the other embodiment.





FIG. 6

is a schematic diagram of a control unit in the control system according to the other embodiment.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a perforating system


10


according to an embodiment of the invention for use in a well


12


is illustrated. The perforating system


10


in the illustrated embodiment includes a multi-gun string having a control system that may include multiple control units


14


A-


14


C that control activation of guns or charges in the string. Each control unit


14


may be coupled to switches


16


and


18


(illustrated as


16


A-


16


C and


18


A-


18


C). The cable switches


18


A-


18


C are controllable by the control units


14


A-


14


C, respectively, between on and off positions to enable or disable current flow through one or more electrical cables


20


(which may be located in a wireline or coiled tubing, for example) to successive control units. The switches


16


A-


16


C are each coupled to a detonating device


22


(illustrated as


22


A-


22


C) that may be found in a perforating gun for example. The detonating device may be a standard detonator, a capacitor discharge unit (CDU), or other initiator coupled to initiate a detonating cord to fire shaped charges or other explosive devices in the perforating gun. If activated to an on position, a switch


16


allows electrical current to flow to a coupled detonating device


22


.




In the illustrated embodiment, the switch


18


A controls current flow to the control unit


14


B, and the switch


18


B controls current flow to the control unit


14


C. For added safety, a dummy detonator


24


may optionally be coupled at the top of the string. The dummy detonator


24


is first energized and set up before the guns or charges below may be detonated. The dummy detonator


24


includes a cable switch


26


that controls current flow to the first control unit


14


A. The dummy detonator


24


also includes a control unit


31


as well as a dummy switch


28


, which is not coupled to a detonator.




The one or more electrical cables


20


extend through a wireline, coiled tubing, or other carrier to surface equipment (generally indicated as


30


), which may include a surface system


32


, which may be a general-purpose or special-purpose computer, any other microprocessor- or microcontroller-based system, or any control device. The surface system


32


is configurable by tool activation software to issue commands to the downhole tool (e.g., perforating system


10


) to set up and to selectively activate one or more of the control units


14


.




Bi-directional electrical communication (by digital signals or series of tones, for example) between the surface system


32


and control units


14


downhole may occur over one or more of the electrical cables


20


. The electrical communication according to one embodiment may be bi-directional so that information of the control units


14


may be monitored by the tool activation software in the surface system


32


. The information, which may include the control units's identifiers, status, and auxiliary data or measurements, for example, is received by the system


32


to verify correct selection and status information. This may be particularly advantageous where an operator at the wellsite desires to confirm which of the devices downhole has been selected before actual activation (or detonation in the case of a perforating gun or explosive).




In other embodiments, a system such as a computer or other control device may be lowered downhole with the tool string. This system may be an interface through which a user may issue commands (e.g., by speech recognition or keyboard entries).




In one embodiment of the invention, each control unit


14


may be assigned an address by the tool activation software in the surface system


32


during system initialization. One advantage provided by the soft-addressing scheme is that the control units


14


do not need to be hard-coded with predetermined addresses. This reduces manufacturing complexity in that a generic control unit can be made. Another advantage of soft-addressing is that the control units may be assigned addresses on the fly to manipulate the order in which devices downhole are activated. In other embodiments, the control units


14


may be hard coded with pre-assigned addresses or precoded during assembly. Additional information may be coded into the control units, including the type of device, order number, run number, and other information.




The tool activation system according to embodiments of the invention also allows defective devices in the string to be bypassed or “skipped over.” Thus, a defective device in a multi-device string (such as a gun string) would not render the remaining parts of the string inoperable.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, a control unit


14


and switches


16


and


18


according to an embodiment are shown. A microcontroller


100


(which may by way of example be an


8051


microcontroller made by any one of several manufacturers) forms the processing core of the control unit


14


, which communicates with other equipment (located downhole or at the surface) through an input/output (I/O) circuit


102


and the electrical cable


20


. The components of the control unit


14


may be powered by a power supply


110


. Other types of control devices may be substituted for the microcontroller


100


, including microprocessors, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable gate arrays (PGAs), discrete devices, and the like. Although the description of some embodiments refer to microcontrollers, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to such embodiments. In this application, the term control device may refer to a single integrated device or a plurality of devices. In addition, the control device may include firmware or software executable on the control device.




In one embodiment, the microcontroller


100


may control the switches


16


and


18


through high side drivers (HSDs)


104


and


106


, respectively. HSDs are included in the embodiment of

FIG. 2

since positive polarity voltages (typically in the hundreds of volts, for example) may be transmitted down the electrical cable


20


. The microcontroller


100


in the illustrated embodiment may be biased between a voltage provided by the power supply


110


and ground voltage. The outputs of the microcontroller


100


may be at TTL levels. To activate the switches


16


and


18


, the HSDs


104


and


106


, respectively, convert TTL-level signals to high voltage signals (e.g., one or two threshold voltages above the electrical cable voltage) to turn on field effect transistors (FETs)


112


and


114


. In further embodiments, HSDs may not be needed if negative polarity signals are transmitted down the electrical cable


20


. Other types of switches may be used, including, for example, switches implemented with bipolar transistors and mechanical-type switches.




The microcontroller


100


is adapted to receive commands from the tool activation program in the surface system


32


so that it may selectively activate FETs


112


and


114


as indicated in the commands. When turned on, the transistor


114


couples two sections


120


and


122


of the electrical cable


20


. Likewise, the transistor


112


couples the signal or signals in the upper section


120


of the cable


20


to the detonating device


22


. In addition, each microcontroller


100


may be configured according to commands issued by the tool activation program Referring to

FIG. 3

, a flow diagram is shown of the tool activation program executable in the surface system


32


. Before any unit in the string is activated, a sequence of set up and verification tasks are performed. The tool activation program first sends a wake event (at


202


) down the electrical cable


20


to a control unit


14


downhole. In one embodiment, the top control unit is the first to receive this wake event. This process is iteratively performed until all control units


14


in the multi-tool string have been initialized and set up.




The wake event is first transmitted to a control unit I, where I is initially set to the value


1


to represent the top control unit. The program next interrogates (at


204


) the control unit I to determine its address and status (including whether it has been assigned an address or not), positions of switches


16


and


18


, and the status of the microcontroller


100


. If the control unit I has not yet been assigned an address, the program assigns (at


206


) a predetermined address to the control unit I. For example, the bottom unit may be assigned the lowest address while the top unit is assigned the highest address. Thus, if activation is performed by sequentially incrementing the address, the bottom unit is activated first followed by units coupled above.




Next, the program requests verification of the assigned address (at


208


). Next, the program confirms the assigned address (at


210


). If an incorrect address is transmitted back by the control unit I, then the process at


202


-


210


is repeated until a correct address assignment is performed. If after several tries the address assignment remains unsuccessful, the control unit I may be marked defective. If the address is confirmed, then a command is sent by the tool activation program down the electrical cable


20


to close the cable switch


18


associated with the control unit I. This couples the electrical cable


20


to the next control unit I+


1


(if any). The program may next interrogate (at


214


) control units


1


−I (all units that have been so far configured) to determine their status. This may serve as a double-check to ensure proper initialization and set up of the control units.




The program then determines if the end of the multi-tool string has been reached (at


216


). If not, the value of I is incremented (at


218


), and the next control unit I is set up (


202


-


216


).




If the end of the multi-tool string has been reached (as determined at


216


), then all tools in the string have been configured and activation power may be applied (at


220


) to the next functional control unit in the activation sequence, which the first time through may be the bottom control unit in one example. The activation power is transmitted down the cable


20


and through the switch


16


to initiate the detonating device


22


to fire the attached perforating gun.




The process is repeated to activate the other tools in the string. For example, if a control unit N has been activated to fire perforating gun N, then the control unit N−


1


is classified as the last unit in the string. Power is removed from the electrical cable


20


and the tasks performed in

FIG. 3

are then applied to the remaining control units (control units


1


to N-


1


, with control unit N-


1


being considered the last control unit in the string). After sequencing through the tasks to set up the control units


1


to N-


1


, activation power may next be applied to control unit N-


1


. This process may be repeated for all tools in the string until the very top tool has been activated. In addition, if at any time interrogation by the program indicates that a control unit or tool is defective, that particular control unit and tool may be bypassed to activate the remaining control units. As a result, a defective tool does not render the entire multi-tool string inoperable.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, a tool activation system according to another embodiment of the invention is illustrated. The system includes a series of addressable control units


300


A-


300


C each coupled to corresponding tools


302


A-


302


C (which in the illustrated embodiment are detonating devices forming parts of perforating guns). Commands are transmitted by the surface system


32


to select one of the control units


300


A-


300


C. The command signals may be in the form of digital signals, a series of tones, or other types of communication, for example. The addressable control units


300


A-


300


C prevent power from reaching the detonating devices


302


A-


302


C prior to receipt of a specific command to arm the detonating devices. When addressed, each control unit responds with a specific identification and its status. The identification may include a manufacturer's serial number, an address, or some detailed information about the tool. Each control unit in the illustrated embodiment of

FIG. 4

may include a microcontroller


304


(or another device or devices such as microprocessors, ASICs, PGAs, discrete devices, and the like) and switches


306


,


308


,


310


and


312


. The electrical cable


20


essentially feeds into a series of three switches


312


,


310


and


308


, all controllable by the microcontroller


304


. The switch


306


is a cable or cable switch that couples the electrical cable


20


above to the next control unit


300


. The arming sequence of the control unit is as follows: first the microcontroller


304


activates a PREARM signal to enable the switch


312


; next, the microcontroller


304


asserts a signal ARM


1


to activate the switch


310


; and finally, the microcontroller


304


activates a second arming signal ARM


2


to activate the third switch


308


. Only when all three signals are activated is shooting power provided to the detonating device


302


through the switches


306


-


310


. Further, as added precaution, the three signals need to be activated above certain threshold levels.




Once the detonating device


302


is initiated and the attached perforating gun fired, the cable switch


306


may be closed by the microcontroller


304


in response to a surface command to allow selection of the next control unit


300


. The cable switch


306


also can be used to bypass a defective control unit (such as a control unit that does not respond to a command).




Referring to

FIG. 5

, the tool activation control sequence according to this other embodiment of the invention is illustrated. First, a low amount of power is provided by the surface system


32


to the tool string (at


402


) to activate the control units in the tool string. The amount of current supplied is sufficiently low to ensure that the coupled detonating devices


302


do not detonate in the event of an electrical connection failure. When the initial current is received by the first control unit (


300


A), the microcontroller


304


starts an initialization sequence that maintains the PREARM and ARM signals deasserted. In addition, the microcontroller


304


sends data up the electrical cable to the surface system


32


that includes the microcontroller's address and a status of disarmed. Other information may also be included in the data transmitted to the surface.




The tool activation program in the surface system next determines if a response has been received (at


404


) from a tool down below. If so, the received data may be stored and displayed to a user (at


406


). Next, the program sends a command to couple to the next control unit in the sequence by closing the cable switch


306


. In response, the microcontroller


304


activates the control signal to the cable switch


306


to close it. In one embodiment, the microcontroller


304


may be coupled to a timing device. If the microcontroller


304


does not respond to the bypass switch close command, the timing device would expire to activate the closing of the switch


306


.




Next, the program waits for a time-out condition (at


410


), which indicates the end of string has been reached. Control units are adapted to respond within a certain time period-if no response is received within the time period, then the surface system assumes that either no more devices or a defective device is coupled downstream. The process at


404


-


410


is repeated until the end of string is reached.




The surface system program next creates (at


411


) a list of all detected devices downhole. As an added precaution, the user may compare this list with an expected list to determine if the string has been properly configured. The list of detected devices can also identify device timings as well as devices that are defective. Thus, the user may be made aware of such defective devices downhole, which are bypassed in the activation sequence.




To activate a particular tool downhole, the user would issue a command to the surface system. When the tool activation program receives this user command (at


412


), it transmits an activate command or series of commands (which includes an address of the selected control unit) down to the tool string (at


414


). At this point, because of the initialization process, all the cable switches


306


in all the control units are closed. Thus, each of the microcontrollers


304


is able to receive and decode the activate command. However, only the microcontroller


304


with a matching address will respond to the activate command. When the surface system program receives a confirmation from the selected device downhole (at


416


), it checks the information transmitted with the confirmation to verify that the proper device has been selected. If so, the surface system program enables the supplying of activation power to the selected device (at


418


). The tool activation program then waits for the next activation command.




The addresses of the control units may be preset during manufacture. Alternatively, jumpers or switches may be set in these control units to set their addresses. Another method includes the use of nonvolatile memory in the control units that may be programmed with the control unit's address any time after manufacture and before use.




Referring to

FIG. 6

, some of the circuits of a control unit according to the alternative embodiment are illustrated in more detail. The illustrated embodiment is merely one example of how the control unit may be implemented—other implementations are possible. The electrical cable


20


is coupled from above through a diode


502


to a node N


1


in the control unit


300


. An over-voltage protection circuit


504


couples the internal node N


1


to ground to protect circuitry from an over-voltage condition. The microcontroller


304


includes a receive input (RCV) to receive data over the cable


20


and a transmit output (XMIT) to transmit data to the cable


20


. The RCV input is coupled to an output of an inverter


506


, whose input is coupled to a resistor and capacitor network including resistors


508


,


510


and a capacitor


512


all coupled between node N


1


and the ground node. A signal coming down the cable


20


is received by the input of the inverter


506


and provided to the RCV input of the microcontroller


304


. The XMIT output drives the cathode of a diode


514


. A zener diode


516


is coupled between the anode of the diode


514


and node N


1


. On the other side, a resistor


518


is coupled between the anode of the diode


514


and ground.




A clock generator


520


provides the clock input to the microcontroller


304


. The other outputs of the microcontroller


304


include signals PREARM, ARM


1


, and ARM


2


. Logically, as shown in

FIG. 4

, the signals PREARM, ARM


1


, and ARM


2


control switches


312


,


310


and


308


, respectively, in each control unit. These switches


312


,


310


and


308


may be implemented using serially coupled transistors


522


and


524


, which couple the node NI to the detonating device


302


through a diode


526


. The gate of the transistor


522


is coupled through a resistor


528


and a diode


530


to the signal PREARM of the microcontroller


304


. The gate of the transistor


522


is also driven by the output of an inverter


532


through a resistor


534


. The input of the inverter


532


is coupled to the signal ARM


2


controlled by the microcontroller


304


. The gate of the transistor


524


is driven by the output ARM


1


from the microcontroller


304


. Thus, the sequence for activating the detonating device


302


is as follows: the signal PREARM is driven high, the signal ARM


1


is driven high, and the signal ARM


2


is driven low. This turns both transistors


522


and


524


on to couple power from the electrical cable


20


through node N


1


to the detonating device


302


.




The cable switch


306


in one embodiment may be implemented with a transistor


536


, which couples the internal node N


1


of the control unit to the cable down below. The gate of the transistor


536


is coupled to a node BYPG that is the output of an RC network formed by a resistor


538


and a capacitor


539


. The other side of the resistor


538


is coupled to a bypass output (BYP) of the microcontroller


304


. In the illustrated embodiment, the timing device to bypass a defective microcontroller is formed by the resistor


538


and the capacitor


539


. Thus, if the microcontroller


304


is not functioning for some reason, a pull-up resistor (not shown but coupled to the output pin BYP either internally or externally to the microcontroller) pulls the node BYPG to a “high” voltage after an amount of time determined by the RC constant defined by the resistor


538


and the capacitor


539


. The node BYPG is coupled to the gate of a FET


536


, which is part of the cable switch


306


. When the node BYPG is pulled high after the time delay, the FET


536


is turned on, which allows communication to downstream devices on the electrical cable. This allows a defective microcontroller to be bypassed.




In the illustrated embodiment of

FIG. 6

, negative polarity signals are transmitted down the electrical cable


20


. The microcontroller is biased between the voltage at node N


1


and a high voltage provided by a power supply (not shown). To turn off the transistors


522


,


524


, and


536


, the gates of those transistors are driven to the voltage of N


1


. To activate the transistors, their gates are driven to the power supply high voltage.




Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. For example, although the drawings illustrate a perforating system that may include multiple guns or explosives, other multi-device tool strings may incorporate the selective activation system described. For example, such tool strings may include coring tools.




While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A system to activate devices in a tool string for use in a wellbore, comprising:a central controller; a cable extending into the wellbore; control units adapted to communicate bi-directionally with the central controller over the cable; switches controllable by corresponding control units to enable activation of the devices, the controller adapted to assign an identifier to each control unit and verify the assigned identifier prior to activation; circuitry adapted to bypass a defective control unit or device during an activation sequence, wherein the circuitry includes a timing device operatively coupled to the control unit, the cable coupling the control units; and cable switches controllable by the central controller to isolate control units from the cable in an open state and to electrically couple control units to the cable in a closed state.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the devices include perforating units.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the central controller is adapted to transmit commands to selectively activate one or more of the control units.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the central controller is adapted to transmit commands to configure each of the control units.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the configuration includes assigning the corresponding identifier to each control unit.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein a status of each control unit is communicated to the central controller.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the central controller is adapted to create a list of devices in the tool string and the status of each device.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the status may indicate a device is defective.
  • 9. An activation system for use with a tool string having multiple devices for use in a wellbore, comprising:a processor; control units coupled to control activation of the devices, each control unit assigned a unique identifier by the processor for selectivity of activation; a link for extending into the wellbore to enable communication between the processor and the control units; and switches coupled to the link, each switch when open isolating portions of the link and when closed enabling communications between the portions.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the identifier includes an address.
  • 11. The system of claim 9, wherein each control unit is adapted to communicate the assigned identifier to the processor for identification.
  • 12. The system of claim 9, wherein each control unit includes a microcontroller.
  • 13. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor is adapted to bypass a defective perforating device or control unit.
  • 14. Apparatus for activation of devices in a tool string in a well, comprising:a processor; controllers to control activation of the tool string devices; a communications link between the processor and the controllers, the processor adapted to assign identifiers to the controllers and to verify the assigned identifiers by retrieving the assigned identifiers from the controllers; timing devices operatively coupled to the controllers; and bypass switches coupled between successive controllers, each timing device timing out after a predetermined time period to activate a corresponding bypass switch if a corresponding controller is defective.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the communications link includes an electrical cable coupling the controllers to the processor.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the processor is adapted to selectively activate one of the devices.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the selective activation is based on a unique identifier assigned to each controller.
US Referenced Citations (50)
Number Name Date Kind
2655619 Neal Oct 1953
3181463 Morgan et al. May 1965
3327791 Harrigan, Jr. Jun 1967
3366055 Hollander, Jr. Jan 1968
3517758 Schuster Jun 1970
3640224 Petrick et al. Feb 1972
3640225 Carlson et al. Feb 1972
3978791 Lemley et al. Sep 1976
4137850 Donner Feb 1979
4208966 Hart Jun 1980
4307663 Stonestrom Dec 1981
4393779 Brede et al. Jul 1983
4421030 DeKoker Dec 1983
4422381 Barrett Dec 1983
4441427 Barrett Apr 1984
4471697 McCormick et al. Sep 1984
4496010 Chapman, III Jan 1985
4517497 Malone May 1985
4527636 Bordon Jul 1985
4592280 Shores Jun 1986
4602565 MacDonald et al. Jul 1986
4632034 Colle, Jr. Dec 1986
4638712 Chawla et al. Jan 1987
4662281 Wilhelm et al. May 1987
4674047 Tyler et al. Jun 1987
4700629 Benson et al. Oct 1987
4708060 Bickes, Jr. et al. Nov 1987
4729315 Proffit et al. Mar 1988
4735145 Johnson et al. Apr 1988
4762067 Barker et al. Aug 1988
4777878 Johnson et al. Oct 1988
4788913 Stroud et al. Dec 1988
4831933 Nerheim et al. May 1989
4843964 Bickes, Jr. et al. Jul 1989
4884506 Guerreri Dec 1989
4886126 Yates, Jr. Dec 1989
4944225 Barker Jul 1990
5014622 Jullian May 1991
5088413 Huber et al. Feb 1992
5094166 Hendley, Jr. Mar 1992
5094167 Hendley, Jr. Mar 1992
5172717 Boyle et al. Dec 1992
5295438 Hill et al. Mar 1994
5347929 Lerche et al. Sep 1994
5413045 Miszewski May 1995
5505134 Brooks et al. Apr 1996
5520114 Guimard et al. May 1996
5539636 Marsh et al. Jul 1996
5706892 Jones et al. Jan 1998
5756926 Bonbrake et al. May 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
0 029 671 Sep 1983 EP
0 601 880 A2 Jun 1994 EP
0604694 Jul 1994 EP
677824 Aug 1952 GB
693164 Jun 1953 GB
2118282 A Oct 1983 GB
2100395 B Aug 1984 GB
2190730 A Nov 1987 GB
2226872 A Jul 1990 GB
2265209 A Sep 1993 GB
2290855 A Jan 1996 GB
0 386 860 B1 Sep 1990 WO
WO9623195 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9838470 Sep 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
“Performance Criteria for Small Slapper Detonators” Controller, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London 1984.
“New Developments in the Field of Firing Techniques” by K. Ziegler Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 12, 115-120 (1987).
“Application of Slapper Detonator Technology to the Design of Special Detonation Systems,” by W. H. Meyers Proc. 12th Symposium on Explosives and Pyrotechnics, San Diego, California, Mar. 13-15, 1984, Detonation Systems Development, Los Alamos National Laboratory, pp. 4-5 through 4-19.
“CP DDT Detonators: II. Output Characterization,” by M. L. Lieberman Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 83-1893, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pp. 3-105 through 3-112, undated.
“A Fast, Low Resistance Switch for Small Slapper Detonators,” by D. D. Richardson and D. A. Jones Department of Defense Materials Research Laboratories Report MRL-R-1030, Victoria, Australia, undated.
“The Effect of Switch Resistance on the Ringdown of a Slapper Detonator Fireset,” by D. D. Richardson Department of Defense Materials Research Laboratories Report MRL-R-1004, Victoria, Australia, undated.
“Flyer Plate Motion and Its Deformation During Flight,” by H. S. Yadav and N. K. Gupta Int. J. Impact Engng, vol. 7, No. 1, 1988, pp. 71-83.
“Mossbauer Study of Shock-Induced Effects in the Ordered Alloy Fe50Ni50 In Meteorites,” By R. B. Scorzelli, I. S. Azevedo, J. Danon and Marc A. Meyers J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 17 (1987), pp. 1993-1997.
“Effect of Shock-Stres Duration on the Residual Structure and Hardness of Nickel, Chromel, and Inconel,” by L. E. Murr and Jong-Yuh Huang Materials Science and Engineering, 19 (1975), pp. 115-122.
Critical Energy Criterion for the Shock Initiation of Explosives by Projectile Impact, by H. R. James Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 13, (1988), pp. 35-41.
“High-Temperature-Stable Detonators,” by R. H. Dinegar Proc. 12th Symposium on Explosives and Pyrotechnics, San Diego, California, Mar. 13-15, 1984, Los Alamos National Laboratory, pp. 4-1 through 4-4.
“Shock Initiation of PETN,” by J. C. Cheng Monsanto Research Corporation, Miamisburg, Ohio, pp. 1-31 through 1-35, undated.
“Exploding Metallic Foils for Slapper, Fuse, and Hot Plasma Applications: Computational Predictions, Experimental Observations,” by I. R. Lindemuth, J. H. Brownell, A. E. Greene, G. H. Nickel, T. A. Oliphant and D. L. Weiss, Thermonuclear Applications Group, Applied Theoretical Physics Division, and W. F. Hemsing and I. A. Garcia, Detonation Systems Group, Dynamic Testing Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, pp. 299-305, undated.
“A New Kind of Detonator—The Slapper,” by J. R. Stroud Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, University of California, Livermore, California, pp. 22-1 through 22-6, undated.
“Pyrotechnic Ignition in Minislapper Devices,” by D. Grief and D. Powell Awre, Aldermaston, Reading RG7 4PR, Berkshire, England, Controller, HMSO, London, 1981, pp. 43-1 through 43-10.
“Exploding Foils—The Production of Plane Shock Waves and the Acceleration of Thin Plates,” by D. V. Keller & J. R. Penning, Jr. The Boeing Company, Seattle, Washington, pp. 263-277, undated.
“Acceleration of Thin Plates by Exploding Foil Techniques,” by A. H. Guenther, D. C. Wunsch and T. D. Soapes Pulse Power Laboratory, Physics Division, Research Directorate Air Force Special Weapons Center, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, pp. 279-298, undated.
“A Low-Energy Flying Plate Detonator,” by A. K. Jacobson Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND 81-0487C, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1981, pp. 49-1 through 49-20.
“Sequential Perforations in Boreholes,” by H. Lechen ANTARES Datensysteme GmbH, Jan. 1998.
“A Simple Method for Estimating Well Productivity,” by J. E. Brooks. SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, Jun. 2-3, 1997.
“Unique Features of SCBs,” by P. D. Wilcox and “SCB Explosive Studies” by R. W. Bickes, Jr. Initiating and Pyrotechnic Components Division 2515, undated.