Wellbores are generally drilled into the ground or ocean bed to recover natural deposits of oil and gas, as well as other desirable materials that are trapped in geological formations in the Earth's crust.
In various oil and gas exploration operations, it may be beneficial to have information about the subsurface formations that are penetrated by a wellbore. For example, certain formation evaluation schemes include measurement and analysis of the formation pressure and permeability. These measurements may be useful in predicting the production capacity and production lifetime of the subsurface formation. Evaluating and/or measuring properties of encountered formations, formation fluids, and/or formation gasses may also be beneficial. An example property is the phase-change pressure of a formation fluid, which may be a bubble point pressure, a dew point pressure and/or an asphaltene onset pressure depending on the type of fluid. In some cases, a drillstring is removed and a wireline tool deployed into the wellbore to test, evaluate, and/or sample the formation(s), formation gas(es), and/or formation fluid(s).
Until a couple of decades ago, most of the wells drilled were vertical. Gravity and weight bars in the tool strings helped convey wireline (WL) tools rather easily in these wells. Today, the search for hydrocarbons has undergone a quantum leap in terms of the profile of the wells. Multi-laterals and horizontal wells are being drilled to boost oil recovery from the same reservoir. The technology required to convey tools in such wells has had to catch up to meet the growing needs of the industry. Tractors, Coil Tubings, High Strength Cables and TLC (Tough Logging Conditions) are now used to convey tools in such ultra-deep and extended reach wells. But these challenging environments posed even bigger challenges for conveyance operations. The cables saw increased torque, not just while tractoring in horizontal wells, but also in ultra-deep vertical wells. Previously, tension and compression in the cables were the only two parameters monitored in real time. But one other parameter, cable torque, is often not measured or monitored during the entire operation.
A better understanding of the various disclosed system and method embodiments can be obtained when the following detailed description is considered in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
The following discussion is directed to various embodiments of the presented subject matter. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale. Certain features of the embodiments may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form and some details of conventional elements may not be shown in the interest of clarity and conciseness. Although one or more of these embodiments may be preferred, the embodiments disclosed should not be interpreted, or otherwise used, as limiting the scope of the disclosure, including the claims. It is to be fully recognized that the different teachings of the embodiments discussed below may be employed separately or in any suitable combination to produce desired results. In addition, one skilled in the art will understand that the following description has broad application, and the discussion of any embodiment is meant only to be exemplary of that embodiment, and not intended to intimate that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to that embodiment.
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular features or components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, different persons may refer to the same feature or component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components or features that differ in name but not function. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale. Certain features and components herein may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form and some details of conventional elements may not be shown in interest of clarity and conciseness.
In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . .” Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection, or through an indirect connection via other devices, components, and connections. In addition, as used herein, the terms “axial” and “axially” generally mean along or parallel to a central axis (e.g., central axis of a body or a port), while the terms “radial” and “radially” generally mean perpendicular to the central axis. For instance, an axial distance refers to a distance measured along or parallel to the central axis, and a radial distance means a distance measured perpendicular to the central axis.
To further assist the reader's understanding of the disclosed systems and methods, environments for their use and operation are described. Accordingly, an illustrative cable conveyance environment is shown in
The sensor or load cell 206 may be any suitable sensor for measuring torque. For example, the sensor 206 may include a strain gauge with a Wheatstone bridge arrangement arranged so as to measure relative torque between the cable 204 and the downhole tool 202. The bridge is arranged along the length of the tool 202. With no load on the load cell 206, the diagonally opposite nodes in the Wheatstone bridge show the same resistance. The bridge is said to be completely balanced under this condition. As the torque on the cable increases or decreases, the load cell receives and/or detects torque. This results in a change in resistance across the opposite nodes of the bridge. This change in resistance is then later correlated to load in pounds by a processor in the sensor 206 or the downhole tool 202. For example, the processor may include a digital telemetry cartridge (not shown).
As an example configuration, the downhole tool 202 can include an intermediate housing 203 and a lower housing 201, where the sensor 206 is keyed into the lower housing 201 and held fixed into the intermediate housing 203 via screws 207. The lower housing 201 of the downhole tool 202 is free to twist about the z-axis relative to the intermediate housing 203. This will cause a twisting motion to be exerted on the sensor 206 that can be measured to determine torque.
In this embodiment, the sensor 206 is arranged to measure torque in the cable 204. For example, the sensor 206 may include a Wheatstone bridge rotated by 45 degrees to measure torque. As an example, the sensor 206 may be housed in, or integral with, the downhole tool 202, where the cable 204 experiences the maximum amount of torque. Alternatively, the sensor 206 may be located in a cable head used for attaching the downhole tool 202 to the cable 204. Further, the downhole tool 202 and/or the sensor 206 may include the capability of measuring cable torque and downhole temperature. The measured temperature may be used to calibrate the torque measurements from the sensor 206. In other embodiments, the sensor 206 includes the capability of measuring cable torque, tension, compression, and downhole temperature all in real-time.
Monitoring torque seen by the cable 204 will assist an operator in reducing field maintenance cost of cables. Over a period of time, enough data about the exposure of the cable to different torque values for different time period will be obtained. This data may be used to map future cable servicing and replacement intervals. Monitoring cable torque in real-time with the sensor 206 will also help an operator in reducing the need for excessive cable de-torquing trips downhole, and reduce the risk of cable damage. The sensor 206 will allow an operator to monitor the torque level constantly over time. Some embodiments can include an alarm mechanism to alert the operator when the torque in the cable 204 reaches a certain level or threshold. For instance, during operation, the operator can be notified by an alarm via logging facility 144 when the torque sensor 206 measures torque at a certain threshold that could possibly lead to cable failure. Alternatively, the operator can be notified visually via computing facility 150. Once notified, the operator is allowed time to slow down or cease conveyance.
The apparatus may also include a telemetry system to communicate measured data from the downhole tool 202 to the computing facility 150 or a display device at the surface. For example, the downhole tool 202 may include a telemetry subsystem (not shown) that allows the tool 202 to communicate with a surface computing facility 150 that is located at the earth surface from which the wellbore extends. The telemetry system may also include the use of an Enhanced Digital Telemetry Cartridge (EDTC). The EDTC correlates the change in resistance across opposite nodes of the bridge to loads in pounds. This is how the load cell measures tension and compression in the cable. The telemetry system transfers this data to the surface.
Although only a few example embodiments have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the example embodiments without materially departing from the presented subject matter. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the following claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures. Thus, although a nail and a screw may not be structural equivalents in that a nail employs a cylindrical surface to secure wooden parts together, whereas a screw employs a helical surface, in the environment of fastening wooden parts, a nail and a screw may be equivalent structures. It is the express intention of the applicant not to invoke 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 for any limitations of any of the claims herein, except for those in which the claim expressly uses the words “means for” together with an associated function.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2604526 | Basham et al. | Jul 1952 | A |
2925251 | Arps | Feb 1960 | A |
3402601 | Heineman | Sep 1968 | A |
3761863 | Straus | Sep 1973 | A |
3917230 | Barron | Nov 1975 | A |
3942373 | Rogers | Mar 1976 | A |
4265110 | Moulin | May 1981 | A |
4269063 | Escaron | May 1981 | A |
4928764 | Roessler | May 1990 | A |
5062048 | Coulter et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5351531 | Kerr | Oct 1994 | A |
5375476 | Gray | Dec 1994 | A |
5559294 | Hoium et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
6233746 | Skinner | May 2001 | B1 |
6553825 | Boyd | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6598859 | Kureck et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6662645 | Brewer | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6796191 | Boyd | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7793712 | Yamate et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7894297 | Nutt | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8024957 | McKee | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8631882 | Keast | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8939039 | Ratcliffe et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20020124640 | Brewer | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050096846 | Koithan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050194185 | Gleitman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080216554 | McKee | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090090555 | Boone et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090194275 | Bissonnette et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100006279 | Martinez et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110214477 | Gray et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110253447 | Gleitman | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110292384 | Ramos et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120279322 | Ratcliffe et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304758 | Kumar | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130081803 | Tao et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130160995 | Ocalan et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130213129 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140041865 | Paulk et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140166266 | Read | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174725 | Dalvi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140260592 | Mason et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140326510 | Wessel | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150027736 | Smaardyk | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report & Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2013/073278 on Mar. 18, 2014; 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140174725 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |