1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to apparatus used to in connection with the servicing of wellbores (namely, those of oil and gas wells), including the treatment of fluids in the wellbore, including but not limited to “clear” (that is, non-solids bearing) completion fluids in the wellbores, solids-bearing drilling muds, or any other fluids. More specifically, this invention relates to an apparatus run downhole on a workstring, which catches solids (including not only solids from drilling muds, debris such as cement, milled up downhole tools, but solids remaining from drilling mud, etc.) entrained in the fluids and permits removal of the solids from the wellbore.
2. Related Art
In the drilling and completion of oil and gas wells, a number of situations arise in which solids are present in the wellbore fluid, and removal of the solids is necessary. As an example, during the drilling and/or completion of a well, with drilling mud (that is, solids-bearing drilling mud), solids such as cement particles, pieces of downhole equipment which have been drilled and/or milled, junk lost in the hole, etc. may become present in the mud. Some way to remove such solids is necessary, or at a minimum desired.
In other situations, certain types of oil and gas well completions depend on the use of a solids-free (or as nearly solids free as possible) completion fluid. Such completion fluids, sometimes referred to as completion brines, for example calcium bromide, have densities higher than that of fresh water, due to the salts dissolved therein. Gravel pack completions are an example of a well completion procedure which requires the use of clear completion fluids. In the typical sequence of drilling and completing a well, the drilling of the well generally utilizes drilling mud, which is solids laden. Once the drilling is complete and completion casing is run, the drilling mud is displaced from the wellbore, and a clear completion fluid placed in the wellbore. Some solids from the drilling mud invariably end up in the completion fluid, e.g. from a layer of mud on the interior of the casing string, from surface tanks, etc. It is important to remove as many of such solids as possible, because the completion efficiency of the well can be seriously and adversely impacted if solids remain in the completion fluid. For example, a gravel pack completion can be partially, if not completely, plugged by solids entrained in the completion fluid. As a result, there exists an incentive to clean completion fluids to the greatest extent possible, by removing as many solids as possible.
Therefore, regardless of the type of fluid in a wellbore, it may become desirous to remove solids entrained therein. Various apparatus and methods have been developed in the past to do so, however the prior art apparatus and methods known to applicants have various limitations. The present invention seeks to address such limitations and provide an effective means to trap and remove solids from wellbore fluids.
The present invention comprises a downhole filter tool, to be run into a wellbore (whether run on a tubular string, coiled tubing, wireline, or by any other means), the wellbore being filled with a fluid (whether same be a solids laden fluid such as a drilling mud, or a relatively solids free fluid such as a clear completion fluid), to provide the following non-exclusive functions:
It is to be understood that the preferred embodiment will be described with the tool in its typical orientation in a wellbore, as noted in
With reference to the drawings, one presently preferred embodiment will now be described. As can be seen in
A filter sleeve 30 is slidably mounted on mandrel 20. Filter sleeve 30 comprises fluid filtering openings therein, for fluid flow through filter sleeve 30, and can take various forms, but in the preferred embodiment is a slotted sleeve. Filter sleeve 30 provides a robust filtering device, in the preferred embodiment the fluid filtering openings comprise slots 32, which may be sized as desired depending upon the particular application, to allow fluid flow through filter sleeve 30 while filtering and retaining larger solids within chamber 80 (described below). Alternatively, the fluid filtering openings in filter sleeve 30 may comprise gaps, ports or the like to permit fluid flow through filter sleeve 30 and provide a means for filtering out solids in the fluids. In the preferred embodiment, filter sleeve 30 is free to rotate with respect to the mandrel and can be constructed of various material such as stainless steel, high carbon steel, aluminum, synthetics or the like. In practice, filter sleeve 30 slides over mandrel 20, and is supported internally by radial stabilizer ribs integral to the mandrel. As mentioned previously, the fluid filter openings (slots 32) in filter sleeve 30 may be slots, holes, or other shaped openings, and may be sized so as to provide optimum filtering for a given situation (i.e. expected solids size). Slots 32 in filter sleeve 30 may also be oriented at right angles to the longitude of the filter sleeve.
A diverter 40, which is a generally cylindrical member, is disposed around and movable on mandrel 20, its movement generally limited in an uphole direction by outer assembly, namely stabilizer 22, and in a downhole direction by contact either with an upper end of filter sleeve 30 or a shoulder 24 on mandrel 20. As such, diverter 40 is movable between an upper position (bearing against outer assembly) and a lower position (bearing against upper end of filter sleeve 30, and/or against a shoulder 24 on mandrel 20). Further, in the preferred embodiment, diverter 40 may rotate around mandrel 20, so that diverter 40 may remain rotationally stationary while a drill string is rotated within it. As is shown in the drawings, diverter 40 is positioned above filter sleeve 30. In most operating situations, filter sleeve 30 remains longitudinally fixed with respect to mandrel 20 (except in the bypass situation described later herein).
A wiper 50 is mounted on the outer circumference of diverter 40. It is to be understood that wiper 50 may take various forms. For example, wiper 50 may be of a resilient synthetic material, so as to press relatively tightly against the interior wall of a casing string (even though wiper 50 may not provide a fluid seal therebetween). Alternatively, wiper 50 may comprise a brush, of steel or synthetic bristles, which may serve a function as a brush or scraper against the casing wall, in addition to generating some drag force. A brush embodiment may permit diverter to pass through restricted diameters yet still contact the casing wall. Generally, wiper 50 provides some resistance to fluid flow, so as to tend to redirect fluid through diverter 40, and also to provide a means to move diverter 40 upward or downward. The relatively large cross section area presented by wiper 50 means that even small fluid flow rates will provide sufficient pressure differential across wiper 50 to move diverter 40 upward and downward.
It is to be understood that a relatively close fit between wiper 50 and the casing inner diameter also provides a drag force (wiper 50 tending to remain in one place unless pushed or pulled by movement of filter tool 10), needed for proper operation of the tool. Movement of diverter 40 to its lower position generally occurs when filter tool 10 is being pulled in an uphole direction through the fluid column within the wellbore, or when reverse circulating (it being understood that movement of diverter 40 in an upward direction occurs in the opposite situation). As stated above, the movement of diverter 40 on mandrel 20 is limited in a downward (with respect to mandrel 20) direction by a shoulder 24 on mandrel 20, and in an upward (with respect to mandrel 20) direction by outer assembly, namely stabilizer 22. As can be readily seen in the drawings, diverter 40 comprises a plurality of fluid passages 41, of relatively large flow area, disposed above wiper 50.
As is common in the relevant industry, in one presently preferred embodiment mandrel 20 has threads 60 on either end, in order that it can be made up into a tubular string (for example, a tubing work string, or drillpipe string) and run downhole into a wellbore. However, it is to be understood that filter tool 10 may alternatively be run into and out of a wellbore on coil tubing, wireline, or by any other means known in the art.
A filter sleeve seat 70 controls the downward movement of filter sleeve 30 with respect to mandrel 20. Seat 70 can be seen in
Operation of the Filter Tool
A description of operation of a preferred embodiment of filter tool 10, in its two exemplary and primary operating modes, will serve to further explain the various above-described components and how said components integrate with one another.
Mode 1: Non-Filtering (e.g., Running into a Wellbore or Forward Circulating)
With particular reference to
Mode 2: Filtering (e.g., Pulling Out of Wellbore or Reverse Circulating)
With particular reference to
Diverter 40 is moved to its lower position by fluid movement downwardly relative to filter tool 10, and/or by drag forces on wiper 50 and diverter 40 (the wiper dragging on the casing inner diameter) as filter tool 10 is moved uphole. Diverter 40 moves downward so as to seal against the upper end of filter sleeve 30. Wiper 50 seals the annulus between diverter 40 and the inner wall of the tubular within which the apparatus is run. Therefore, as filter tool 10 moves uphole through the wellbore fluid, the fluid cannot pass by wiper 50. Instead, fluid moving downwardly with respect to the tool is therefore forced through fluid passages 41 in diverter 40, through the annulus between mandrel 20 and diverter 40, into chamber 80 between mandrel 20 and filter sleeve 30, through slots 32 in fiber sleeve 30, and finally back into The annulus between filter sleeve 30 and the casing string. As is readily appreciated, as the fluid passes through slots 32 in filter sleeve 30, any entrained solids are filtered out and remain in chamber 80. By this function, with the tool at an initial downhole position, pulling filter tool 10 uphole through the fluid column forces the entirety of the fluid volume (that is, from the initial tool position uphole) through slots 32 in filter sleeve 30, thereby filtering out substantially the entire fluid column volume.
Depending upon the volume of fluid so filtered, and upon the volume of entrained solids being filtered out, the possibility arises of collection chamber 80 becoming completely full of solids, and in fact blocking fluid flow through slots 32. That situation gives rise to the possibility of a “swabbing” or fluid lock situation taking piece, since all of the fluid is being pushed to pass through the slots, yet the slots are blocked. This situation is akin to attempting to remove the plunger of a syringe from the barrel, when the volume of fluid within the syringe barrel is being held constant.
The present invention comprises a feature which obviates that problem. As mentioned above) filter sleeve 30 rests on seat 70, which is normally spring biased toward an upward position as in
Secondary Fluid Bypass System
In the presently preferred embodiment, filter tool 10 comprises a secondary fluid bypass system, described below. In certain circumstances, wherein filter sleeve 30 would otherwise move downwardly with respect to mandrel 20 (as in the above-described situation, with forces on filter sleeve 30 sufficient to move seat 70 downward, thereby opening a by-pass gap 200 between diverter 40 and filter sleeve 30), filter sleeve 30 becomes jammed and cannot move longitudinally with respect to mandrel 20. This situation may occur for various reasons, for example when chamber 80 accumulates a large volume of solids, or due to damage to filter sleeve 30, etc. Regardless of cause, in this situation the piston effect above described may occur, to the detriment of the operation and possibly further damaging the apparatus.
The secondary bypass, in that situation, permits fluids (and generally the contents of chamber 80) to flow out of chamber 80, thereby by-passing the filtering aspect of the tool. Secondary by-pass system comprises a plurality of ports 300, preferably spaced around the periphery of filter sleeve 30 proximal its lower end.
However, when filter sleeve 30 cannot move downward with respect to mandrel 20, yet downward fluid forces exist (which, as described above, may tend to damage filter tool 10 or other equipment), then said fluid forces act on seat 70, and move seat 70 to the position in
Materials
As is known to those having ordinary skill in the relevant art, various materials may be used to make the present invention. Typically, high strength steels and alloys thereof are used for many parts. Certain parts, such as wiper 50, as described above may be made of a resilient material, such as rubber, elastomers, etc., or may be steel or synthetic bristles It is understood that the present invention encompasses the apparatus made of any suitable materials.
While the preceding description contains many specificities, it is to be understood that same are presented only to describe some of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and not by way of limitation. Changes can be made to various aspects of the invention, without departing from the scope thereof. For example, dimensions can be altered to suit particular applications. In lieu of slots 32 in filter sleeve 30, other openings such as holes, etc. can be used. The size of slots 32, or other fluid openings, may be varied to suit different applications. Different materials may be used for the various components.
Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be determined not by the illustrative examples set forth above, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/163,359, filed Jun. 17, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/669,128, filed Jun. 17, 2010, now abandoned, which is a 371 of PCT/US09/43527, filed May 12, 2009, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/052,373, filed May 12, 2008, for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2927644 | Caldwell | Mar 1960 | A |
4515212 | Krugh | May 1985 | A |
5330003 | Bullick | Jul 1994 | A |
5944100 | Hipp | Aug 1999 | A |
6227291 | Carmichael et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6343648 | Carmichael et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6655462 | Carmichael et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7096950 | Howlett et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20020134554 | Schrenkel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020162655 | Lynde et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050121233 | Frith | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2327445 | Jan 1991 | GB |
2335687 | Sep 1999 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Mi Swaco, 2008 Catalog Specialized Tools, 2008, pp. 1-59, MI LLC, Houston, Texas. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/43527 issued Nov. 13, 2009 (references were previously cited on IDS filed Jan. 14, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/669,128). |
M-I, LLC v. Chad Lee Stelly, et al., In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, C.A. No. 4:09-Cv-01552, Order of Dismissal with Prejudice, Jun. 28, 2012. |
M-I, LLC v. Chad Lee Stelly, et al., In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, C.A. No. 4:09-CV-01552, Third Amended Complaint (Exhibits A-G were designated Attorney Eyes Only at time of filing and have been removed), Sep. 7, 2010. |
M-I, LLC v. Chad Lee Stelly, et al., In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, C.A. No. 4:09-CV-01552, Answer and Counterclaims to Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint, Jan. 28, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130032329 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61052373 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13350551 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 13648175 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13163359 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13350551 | US | |
Parent | 12669128 | US | |
Child | 13163359 | US |