1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to apparatus for downhole placement in a wellbore, to control fluid flow through the wellbore. With further specificity, this invention relates to a type of flow control apparatus, particularly suitable for placement in injection wells (that is, wells in which the primary mode of operation is injecting of fluids into a downhole formation), and which can be cycled through different operating modes by application and release of annulus pressure at the surface of the well.
2. Related Art
Subterranean boreholes, referred to in this application as “wells,” have long been drilled for the production of oil and gas. Wells typically comprise a relatively large diameter tubular string, called casing, which is cemented in a borehole drilled into the earth, into which is run a relatively small diameter tubular string, called tubing, through which fluids either flow from the well, or are injected into the well. As a matter of terminology herein, the term “tubing” refers to the tubular string through which fluid flow (whether production or injection) occurs.
Wells are also used for injection purposes; that is, instead of flowing fluids (oil, gas, and formation water) out of a subsurface formation and up through the tubing to the surface, injection wells are used to inject fluids from the surface down the tubing into a subsurface formation. Fluid injection may be used as a means of disposing of produced water (which, in some cases, cannot be discharged into a surface environment, due to regulatory requirements), and/or as a means of oil and gas production enhancement, by providing a means of formation pressure support.
A fundamental requirement for injection wells is that some form of flow control apparatus be in place to prevent fluid flow from the formation upward into the tubing, when such flow is not desired. It is important to understand that such flow, known as “backflow” to distinguish it from injection, is at times necessary. For example, although fluids being injected (typically, produced water) is processed so as to reduce solids content, often some small amount of solids remain in the fluid stream. At very high injection rates (thousands of oil field barrels per day), such solids can cause problems by partially blocking the formation into which the fluids are being injected. This is noted by increases in required injection pressures. To reverse this undesired condition, the injection well may be permitted to backflow, so that fluids flowing out of the formation will carry with them the objectionable solids, thereby cleaning the injection path.
While fluid flow can be controlled from the surface of the well, problems arise. A wellbore many thousands of feet deep correspondingly has a fluid column many thousands of feet long. When fluid backflow is ongoing, stopping the fluid column at the surface (that is, near the end of its path of travel) can give rise to what is commonly known as the “water hammer” effect. For this and other reasons, particularly (although not exclusively) in injection wells, especially in a flowback condition, fluid flow is preferably controlled by a flow control apparatus near the source of the flow—that is, one located in the tubing downhole, near the bottom of the well.
Various devices for certain types of subsurface fluid flow control are well known in the art, commonly referred to as Surface Controlled Sub Surface Control Valves, or SCSSVs. Such valves are primarily for safety purposes, to provide a means of shutting in producing oil and gas wells if surface controls fail. SCSSVs are typically run in the tubing relatively near the surface of the well, on the order of 1000 feet deep or less, and are controlled by a hydraulic control line run in the tubing/casing annulus, from the valve to the surface. The known art SCSSV design cannot be selectively placed into operating modes which are either sensitive to fluid flow, or insensitive to fluid flow.
There is, therefore, a need for a fluid flow control apparatus adapted to incorporated into a tubing string and placed downhole in a well, if desired many thousands of feet from the surface, and which can be controlled by the surface application of and removal of pressure, whether on the annulus (that is, the annulus between the tubing and casing) of the well or pressure applied via a control line run from the surface downhole to the apparatus. Application and removal of pressure from the surface of the well permits the apparatus to be placed into one of two modes: a sensitive-to-flow mode, in which the apparatus opens in response to fluids being injected, thereby permitting fluid injection, but closes to prevent fluid backflow; and an insensitive-to-flow mode, in which the apparatus is open and permits fluid injection and backflow. The present invention therefore lends itself to operation either by annulus pressure or control line pressure.
With reference to the drawings, some of the presently preferred embodiments of the present invention can now be described. It is to be understood that various changes can be made to the invention, without departing from the scope thereof. It is to be further understood that the scope of the invention covers use thereof in any sort of well, e.g. whether production wells or injection wells.
Broadly speaking, the apparatus may be best understood by considering it as having two broad elements: (1) a valve, comprising a flow tube and flapper; and (2) a lock, comprising a piston responsive to downhole pressure differential (selectively caused by annulus pressure controlled from the surface of the well), and an indexer operatively linked to the piston. The indexer shoulders against the flow tube, so that when the indexer is in a downward position, the flow tube is positively held in said downward position (and as a result, the flapper is blocked open).
It is to be understood that references to “upward” mean toward the surface of the well, and “downward” mean toward the bottom of the well. It is to be further understood that in a typical application the apparatus is made up into a tubing string, and run downhole to a desired subsurface position, typically thousands of feet from the surface of the well. Consequently, there is fluid both within the tubing and interior of the apparatus, and also fluid in the annulus between the tubing and the casing and the apparatus and the casing. It is to be understood that in order for the tool to be operated, it is important to have the same fluid type (e.g. hydrostatic column) in both the annulus and tubing.
Valve Element
Overall, the flow control apparatus 10 comprises an elongated outer housing 20 with a bore 30 therethrough. Threaded connections 11 and 12 are provided at either end of the apparatus, so that it can be made up into a string of tubing. The valve element comprises a longitudinally movable flow tube 40 mounted in bore 30, which is biased by flow tube spring 50 in an upward direction. A flapper 60 is hinge mounted below flow tube 40, so that it can rotate between two positions: a first or open position, where flapper 60 is rotated out of the path of bore 30; and a second or closed position (flapper 60 tends to be rotated to the second position by a flapper spring 70), where flapper 60 blocks the path of bore 30, and prevents fluid flow back up the tubing. Flapper 60, in a presently preferred embodiment, is of the type known as a “curved flapper,” rather than a flat flapper, as can be seen in the figures, especially
Lock Element
The lock element comprises a longitudinally reciprocable piston 80 disposed in a chamber 85, which is positioned eccentric to bore 30 within outer housing 20.
Indexer groove 110 comprises several distinct groove segments 110A-110D, as can be readily seen in
Operating Modes of the Apparatus: Sensitive-to-Flow and Insensitive-to-Flow
In a first operating mode, or sensitive-to-flow mode, the valve element operates substantially free from influence from the lock element (in this mode, piston 80, and consequently indexer 100, is in an upward position, as described in detail below), and will open and close with the presence or absence of fluid flow in a downward direction. As fluid is pumped downhole, flapper 60 will first be urged open by fluid pressure. Flow tube 40 contains a section of reduced inner diameter 45. Fluid flow through flow tube 40 in a downward direction, due to the “choke effect” from the section of reduced inner diameter 45, creates a downward force on flow tube 40, which overcomes the force from flow tube spring 50, forces flow tube 40 downward, and in turn contacts and rotates flapper 60 out of the path of bore 30, to its first or open position. Increased fluid flow continues to force flow tube 40 downward, forcing flapper 60 to rotate to its fully open position. However, should fluid flow in a downward direction cease, the resulting force on flow tube 40 ceases, flow tube 40 is moved upward by flow tube spring 50 and out of engagement with flapper 60, and flapper spring 70 will rotate flapper 60 to its closed position. Fluid flow in an upward direction is then prevented. As can be seen, in this operating mode whether the valve is open or closed depends upon whether fluid is flowing therethrough, hence the term “sensitive-to-flow.”
In a second operating mode, or insensitive-to-flow mode, flow tube 40 is positively held in its downward position (as opposed to being held in the downward position only by fluid flow forces), and as a result flapper 60 is rotated out of the path of bore 30 and the valve is “locked open,” regardless of presence or absence of fluid flow or direction of same. In this mode, the valve element is not independent of the lock element, but instead is controlled by it. Piston 80 is forced downward by piston spring 90, and consequently indexer 100 is also forced to a downward position. A shoulder 130 on the inner surface of indexer 100 engages a shoulder 46 on the outer surface of flow tube 40, forcing flow tube 40 to its downward position, thereby holding flapper 60 open as described above.
It is therefore the position of indexer 100 which fundamentally determines whether the apparatus is in the sensitive-to-flow or insensitive-to-flow mode.
A description of the movement and position of the various parts of the apparatus as it is cycled between its two operating modes brings operation of the apparatus into focus. It is to be understood that the apparatus may be cycled between its two operating modes by the application and release of annulus pressure from the surface of the well, and may be so cycled a substantially unlimited number of times.
While Running into the Wellbore (Insensitive-to-Flow Mode)
During this phase, the valve element must be open so that fluid may flow freely into the tubing. The apparatus must therefore be in the insensitive-to-flow mode, as described above, and as shown in
During Normal Injection Operations (Sensitive-to-Flow Mode)
Once the apparatus is in the desired downhole location (i.e. set at the proper depth), it may be placed in the sensitive-to-flow mode.
Then, the annulus pressure at the surface of the well is released. Piston spring 90 forces piston 80, and indexer 100, downward. As constrained by pin 120, indexer 100 moves downward without rotation, a relatively short distance, until pin 120 is pushed past the next stairstep into groove segment three 110C. As can be seen from the figure, the uppermost end of groove segment three 110C rests against pin 120, and indexer 100 is constrained from further downward movement. As such, indexer 100 is held upward, out of engagement with flow tube 40, and the apparatus is therefore in the sensitive-to-flow mode described above. This is the position that the apparatus will typically be in, while injection operations are being conducted in the well.
Cycling Back into the Insensitive-to-Flow Mode
When desired to return the apparatus to the insensitive-to-flow mode, application of annulus pressure at the surface is again used. Applying the predetermined amount of annulus pressure at the surface of the well again creates a differential pressure downhole, which (as described above) overcomes the force of piston spring 90, and forces piston 80 upward. Indexer 100 consequently is forced upward, and at the same time rotates due to pin 120 tracking in groove segment three 110C, until pin 120 is pushed down the next stairstep into groove segment four 110D, at which point indexer 100 is constrained from further upward movement (since the lowermost end of groove segment four 110D cannot move past pin 120).
Next, the annulus pressure is removed, and piston spring 90 is again able to force piston 80, and indexer 100, downward. Indexer 100 moves downward with pin 120 in groove segment four 110D, along the path shown until indexer 100 is moved to the starting position described above, when pin 120 is pushed down the next stairstep to once again fall into groove segment one 110A, in the starting position A as described above. The apparatus is now once again in the position described above, and as shown in
It is to be understood that the above described sequence of operation can be repeated as many times as desired, requiring only placing and releasing annulus pressure at the surface of the well.
It is important to note that piston spring 80 (although stronger than flow tube spring 50) is of insufficient strength to overcome a significant pressure differential across flapper 60 (i.e., pressure below the flapper greater than pressure above the flapper). As a result, in the event of a relatively high differential pressure across flapper 60, flow tube 40 will simply be unable to push it (flapper 60) out of the way, but cannot exert enough force on the flapper to shear the pin on which flapper 60 rotates.
It is to be understood that the apparatus, particularly the outer housing, may be made up from several segments for ease in assembly of the overall apparatus. In one presently preferred embodiment, the segments of the outer housing are joined by pinned joints (joined by a plurality of pins 140), see
With regard to materials, the various components of the apparatus are preferably made of high grade metal alloys (typ. 120 KSI yield strength), as are well known in the relevant art. Seals and the like are made of suitable materials known in the art.
With regard to dimensions, the apparatus (and the components thereof can be sized so as to permit use in different size wellbores, and with different size tubing strings.
While the preceding description contains many specificities, it is to be understood that same are presented only to describe some of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and not by way of limitation. Changes can be made to various aspects of the invention, without departing from the scope thereof. For example, dimensions and materials may be varied; the strengths of the springs may be set so as to operate at desired pressures; etc.
Therefore, the scope of the invention is not to be measured by the specific examples given, but by the scope of the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This regular patent application claims priority to provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/673,500, filed Apr. 22, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3986554 | Nutter | Oct 1976 | A |
4467867 | Baker | Aug 1984 | A |
4926945 | Pringle et al. | May 1990 | A |
4991624 | Fowler et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5861562 | Pringle et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5996687 | Pringle et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6070608 | Pringle | Jun 2000 | A |
6237683 | Pringle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241015 | Pringle et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6450541 | Bakke | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6732803 | Garcia et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7246668 | Smith | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7270191 | Drummond et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20030079880 | Deaton et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040007365 | Hill et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20060157255 | Smith | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070137869 | MacDougall et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070215352 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070227738 | Dennistoun et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070187107 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60673500 | Apr 2005 | US |