The problem of erosive damage to seals and metal components in downhole flow devices has been a challenge in the industry for quite some time. In a wellbore, for example, sliding sleeves are used in applications where high velocity flow can create a very hostile environment. The high velocity flow, especially when it contains solids, can induce flow erosion even in the hardest materials available. Additionally, when a pressure differential is unloaded across a conventional seal, severe damage can occur that renders the seal inoperable.
In the prior art, techniques that address unloading of a pressure differential across seals have used thin equalizing slots and diffuser type seals. The arrangement is intended to prevent damage to two sets of seals, or packing units, that create a barrier between the annulus and tubing pressure. Examples of this prior art technique are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,316,084 and 5,156,220. Prior designs such as these may not prevent damage to seals caused by abrasive flow because the seals may never be adequately protected from an initial surge of pressure during the opening sequence.
Although prior art sealing techniques may be effective, operators are continually striving for improvements to reduce the effects of erosion or pressure differential on seals used downhole. Accordingly, the subject matter of the present disclosure is directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of, one or more of the problems set forth above.
A downhole flow device has a sliding sleeve and a ported sleeve. The sliding sleeve moves hydraulically along an axis of the ported sleeve to reveal successive ports defined along the axis of the ported sleeve. Fluid pressure applied to an open control line enters a sealed chamber between the sliding sleeve and the housing and moves the sliding sleeve along the ported sleeve.
To limit movement of the sliding sleeve, a catch has a dog that engages in a slot in the sliding sleeve. As the sliding sleeve moves, the dog moves the catch with the sliding sleeve. At a pinnacle position of the catch, the sliding sleeve can no longer be moved by the hydraulic fluid due to the catch engaging a stop. When moving the catch to its stop, the sliding sleeve reveals one of the ports in the ported sleeve, allowing flow to pass through the device.
To reset the catch so the sliding sleeve can be advanced to reveal the next port, a trigger between the sliding sleeve and housing can also move by the hydraulic pressure applied. This trigger moves on the sliding sleeve until it reaches another stop that limits its movement. When hydraulic pressure is released, the trigger moves by the bias of a spring to a reset position on the sliding sleeve. As it moves, the trigger dislodges the catch's dog from the sleeve's slot. This allows a spring to move the catch to a next lower position where the dog can then engage in a next slot on the sliding sleeve. Once completed, the mechanism is reset so that reapplication of hydraulic pressure can move the sliding sleeve to its next position. Applying hydraulic pressure to another port can move the sliding sleeve all the way back to its closed condition.
A seal is provided between the sliding sleeve and the ported sleeve. The seal has a first seal component disposed on the sliding sleeve and has a second seal component disposed on the ported sleeve. These seal components engage one another to seal flow, and they move apart to allow fluid flow through the ports in the ported sleeve. Operation of the device and the seal reduce both erosion and damage caused by high velocity flow, abrasive flow, and differential pressures. In other words, the device and seal prevent damage to the seal when unloading a differential pressure across it, and the seal is designed in such a way that abrasive flow does not have the opportunity to impinge on the sealing surface to cause erosion.
The foregoing summary is not intended to summarize each potential embodiment or every aspect of the present disclosure.
In
For example, the tool 100 can be run as part of a completion tubing string in the well. Once deployed, operators can operate the tool 100 to variably choke back the production from the well's annulus into the tool 100. This may be done to reduce the rate of water produced from the well or to balance the rate of production (and the rate of pressure drop) of one producing zone against another. In some cases, each production zone could have a corresponding tool 100 that can be varied. As opposed to production, the tool 100 may also be used for varied injection of fluids from the tubing string into the annulus of the well.
The ported sleeve 170 has a plurality of ports 174a-g disposed on an axis of the sleeve 170. Exposure of more or less of the ports 174a-g increases or decreases the flow through the tool 100. Although shown having several separate ports 174a-g, the ported sleeve 170 can have one or more ports disposed along the axis of the sleeve 174 so that more or less exposure of the one or more ports can increase or decrease flow through the tool 100. For example, the ported sleeve 170 can having one port that increases in size along the axis of the ported sleeve 170 and can have any desirable shape.
To choke the flow into or out of the tool 100 completely, the sliding sleeve 120 fits all the way onto the ported sleeve 170 as shown in
When the sliding sleeve 120 is moved, for example, the seal 200 separates, and the sliding sleeve 120 opens relative to the ports 174 to allow fluid to flow from a surrounding annulus through windows 106 in the tool's housing 110 (i.e., portion 110e) and into the ported sleeve's bore 172 (or vice versa). As best shown in
In the current arrangement, the tool 100 can operate at eight discrete positions to control the amount of flow area through the tool 100. These positions are defined in percentages of the flow area of the tubing string (specifically the diameter of the ported sleeve's bore 172). For example, the tool's positions can be defined as follows: 0% closed, 1% open, 3% open, 5% open, 7% open, 9% open, 15% open, and 100% open. Therefore, with the tool 100 set at the 5% position, the ports 174a-c are exposed, and the flow area through the tool 100 is 5% of the flow area through comparably sized tubing. As will be appreciated, these values are illustrative. The actual size and number of ports 174a-g for an implementation depends on the overall size of the tool 100 and the desired or expected flow characteristics as well as other implementation specific details. In other examples, the tool 100 may have more or less ports, and some or all of the ports may have the same diameters.
As best shown in
Details of the seal 200 are shown in
The shelves 212/252 define a first flow passage 202, the first ledges 214/254 define a second flow passage 204, and the second shelves 216/256 define a third flow passage 206 through which fluid can flow through the seal 200. The flow passages 202, 204, and 206 create seal points between the metal-to-metal seal produced between the components 210/250. Engagement between the first ledges 214/254 produces the primary sealing function when the components 210/250 are closed against one another.
With an understanding of the seal 200 and its components 210/250, discussion now turns to how the seal 200 achieves pressure assisted and erosion resistant sealing on the tool 100.
1. Pressure Assisted Sealing
The seal 200 is assisted closed in metal-to-metal engagement by either internal pressure acting inside the tool 100 or by external pressure acting outside the tool 100. In
As noted previously, the primary sealing function of the closed seal 200 is provided by engagement of ledges 214/254. As constructed, the engagement 214/254 are set at a circumference that matches a centerline circumference of the lower packing seal 178 on the tool 100. As described below, the arrangement of the ledges 214/254, centerline, the packing seal 178, and other features give pressure assistance to the seal 200 regardless of whether the tool 100 is exposed to internal or external pressure differentials.
In
In
2. Erosion Resistant Sealing
As noted previously, the tool 100 can encounter problems caused by erosive damage to seals and metal components when varying flow therethrough. The seal 200 of the present disclosure is intended to control the velocities of abrasive flow and isolates portion of the seal 200 from the flow as much as possible to mitigate erosive damage.
Returning to
At the instant the seal components 210/250 start to separate and break the seal between the ledges 214/254, the first flow passage 202 allows fluid to flow through the seal 200, but the small gap between the shelves 212/252 defines the smallest available flow area through the seal 200. This secondary choke from the sealing ledges 214/254 also limits the detrimental flow when the seal components 210/250 are first separated.
The limited flow area through the first flow passage 202 means that any sudden erosive flow from fluids flowing from the annulus into the tool (or vice versa) mainly interacts with the shelves 212/252. Accordingly, the shelves 212/252 take the brunt of the erosive flow rather than the sealing ledges 214/254 themselves, which are susceptible to detrimental erosion. In this way, the seal 200 can be self-protecting by making erosion occur away from the sealing ledges 214/254 at initial opening of the seal 200.
As the sliding sleeve 120 is moved on the ported sleeve 170, the area of the flow through passages 202, 204, 206 changes. Details of how the flow area changes are shown in
In one implementation, the sliding sleeve (120) travels approximately 0.5-in. open from the ported sleeve (170) to expose the first port (174a) and allow 1% of flow through the tool 100. In this way, the shelves 212/252 act to choke the flow and take the brunt of any erosive flow until the valve is 1% open. Even after that point, the first inner ledge 214 is already moved clear of the first port (174a) so the ledge 214 can avoid erosive flow, as detailed below.
In a first open condition shown in
As the sliding sleeve 120 continues to open, it reaches a first equalizing condition shown in
The first flow passage 202 from the first shelves 212/252 is extended in comparison to the others so that these shelves 212/252 can define a sacrificial component during initial unloading of pressure. As the two sealing components 210/250 continue to separate, the external extension from the first flow passage 202 maintains a tight clearance and creates an orifice effect of any flow therethrough. As the sealing shelves 212/252 move further apart, the volume and area increases between the two seal components 210/250, thus causing a low pressure area and a drop in flow to develop.
The choke effect from the shelves 212/252 continues until the moving component 210 has moved until its distal ledge 211 reaches the end of the first outer shelf 252 as shown in
At a subsequent opened conditions after
With further movement of the sliding sleeve 120, more of the ports 174 in the ported sleeve 170 can be revealed. Again, as note previously, the tool has eight discrete positions in which the sliding sleeve 120 can reveal ports 174 on the ported sleeve 170 to control flow between 0%, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, 15%, and 100%. Details on how the sliding sleeve 120 is moved relative to the ported sleeve 170 are discussed below.
As noted previously, the sliding sleeve 120 is moved relative to the ported sleeve 170. In general, the sliding sleeve 120 can be moved by any of the techniques conventionally used in the art for a flow device. For example, the sliding sleeve 120 can be moved manually using an appropriate pulling tool, hydraulically by a piston arrangement, or other suitable mechanism. In the current implementation, the disclose tool 100 uses a hydraulically actuated ratcheting motion to move the sliding sleeve 120 relative to the ported sleeve 170. Details of how the tool 100 operates hydraulically are provided in
In
In the opening procedure, for example, pressure from the open control line 130a enters an open port 135 in the housing 110 (i.e., portion 110b) and travels to an outlet at a first chamber 132 between the sliding sleeve 120 and the housing portion 110b. The first chamber 132 is formed by upper and lower seals 123a-b between the sliding sleeve 120 and housing portions 110a-b. Fluid pressure fills this first chamber 132 and acts against a shoulder at upper seal 123b to force the sliding sleeve 120 upward in the housing 110 (i.e., the sleeve 120 moves to the left in
At the same time, fluid pressure from the open port 135 fills a second chamber 134 at another of the port's outlets. Fluid pressure fills this second chamber 134 and acts against a trigger or unlocking sleeve 140 disposed on the sliding sleeve 120. This unlocking sleeve 140 having a shape of a sleeve seals against the housing portions 110b-c with upper and lower seals 143a-b. The fluid pressure moves the unlocking sleeve 140 upward in the housing 110 along the sliding sleeve 120 (i.e., to the left in
The results of this movement are shown in
A catch 150 having dogs 155 is also disposed on the sleeve 120. This catch 150 has the shape of a sleeve and has windows for the dogs 155. As the fluid pressure moves the sliding sleeve 120, the catch 150 remains in position relative to the housing 110 due to the bias of another spring 126. Eventually, the sliding sleeve 120 moves a certain distance so that the dogs 155 in the catch 150 engage a shoulder of the first slot 125a in the sliding sleeve 120, as shown in
Continued pressure at the open control lines 103a moves the sleeve 120 further in the housing 110. The catch 150 engaged by dogs 155 in the first groove 125a also moves upward as shown in
At this point, the sliding sleeve 120 has opened to its first position (i.e., 1% open) to expose the first ports (174a) on the ported sleeve (170) (See
Although fluid pressure at the open control line 130a is released, the sliding sleeve 120 does not move back downward in the housing 110. As noted previously and as shown in
Returning to
Further opening of the sliding sleeve 120 can then be achieved through the same process outlined above. Pressure can again be applied to the open control line 103a, and the sliding sleeve 120 can be ratcheted upward in the housing to the next slotted position by the repeated actions. Release of pressure at the open control line 103a can then reset the hydraulic components for the next movement. Operated in this manner, the tool 100 can be set to any open condition to vary and control the flow from 1% to 100% at the discrete positions in the present example.
In any of the open conditions, the sliding sleeve 120 can be fully closed on the ported sleeve (170) to stop flow. As best shown in
In the current implementation, applying pressure to the close line 103b closes the tool 100 all the way no matter what current position the sliding sleeve 120 has. In some implementations, closing at discrete positions may be desired. To do this, an entire reverse assembly of a catch, trigger, dogs, chambers, and slots can be provided on the tool 100 opposite to those already shown. When hydraulic pressure is applied to the close line 103b, these reverse components can operate in the same manner described above, but only in the reverse direction. In this way, the sliding sleeve 120 can ratchet closed in discrete positions. To operate, the reverse (downward) components must accommodate the upward movement of the sliding sleeve 120 from the (upward) components (i.e., catch, trigger, dogs, etc. described previously) and vice versa.
The foregoing description of preferred and other embodiments is not intended to limit or restrict the scope or applicability of the inventive concepts conceived of by the Applicants. In exchange for disclosing the inventive concepts contained herein, the Applicants desire all patent rights afforded by the appended claims. Therefore, it is intended that the appended claims include all modifications and alterations to the full extent that they come within the scope of the following claims or the equivalents thereof.