The present invention relates generally to the field of fluid transport, and more particularly to methods and devices for operating, monitoring and controlling pumps at a below ground location in a wellhole, such as an oil or gas producing wellhole.
Produced water is underground formation water that is brought to the surface along with oil or gas. It is by far the largest (in volume) by-product or waste stream associated with oil and gas production. According to the American Petroleum Institute (API), about 18 billion barrels (bbl) of produced water were generated by U.S. onshore operations in 1995 (API 2000). Additional large volumes of produced water are generated at U.S. offshore wells and at thousands of wells in other countries, and it has been estimated that in 1999 there was an average of 210 million bbl of water produced each day worldwide. This volume represented about 77 billion bbl of produced water for the entire year. Given that worldwide oil production from conventional sources is nearly 80 million barrels per day (bbl/d, or bpd), one may conclude that 3 bbl of water are produced for each 1 bbl of oil worldwide, and that for the United States, one of the most mature petroleum provinces in the world, the ratio is closer to 6 or 7 bbl of water per 1 bbl of oil. One estimate, in 2004, calculated that more than 14 billion bbl of produced water was derived directly from state oil and gas agencies, with this estimate not including produced water from coal-bed methane (CBM) wells or from offshore U.S. production.
Management of produced water presents challenges and costs to operators. The cost of managing produced water after it is already lifted to the surface and separated from the oil or gas product can range from less than $0.01 to more than several dollars per barrel. If the entire process of lifting, treating, and reinjecting can be avoided, costs are likely to be reduced. With this idea in mind, during the 1990s, oil and gas industry engineers developed various technologies to separate oil or gas from water inside the well. The oil- or gas-rich stream is thereafter carried to the surface, while the water-rich stream is injected to an underground formation without ever being lifted to the surface. These devices are known as downhole oil/water separators (DOWS) and downhole gas/water separators (DGWS).
A number of downhole separation systems have been developed, tested and in some cases implemented, but these have been hampered by several problems implicit in the current systems. These problems include, for example, the fact that downhole equipment is more complicated and expensive that traditional equipment, the installation of the downhole equipment is more complex, and the downhole equipment has to be removed for maintenance at intervals using conventional and expensive equipment.
In addition, a number of authorities require metering of the water injected even if it is not brought to surface, meaning that the downhole equipment is further complicated. The pumps, and possibly meters, have to be powered and the data brought to surface. This requires installing cables into the well further complicating installation and removal, with these power and data cables themselves being sources of failure because they are exposed in installation and easily damaged. Finally, the application of downhole separation is usually most desirable in high water/low producing hydrocarbon wells which cannot stand the additional cost of the current technology.
The present invention includes methods and systems for operating, monitoring, and controlling fluid control systems at a below ground, or downhole, location in a wellhole.
In one aspect, the invention includes a system for operating, monitoring and controlling pumps at a below ground location in a wellhole. The system includes a downhole fluid control system comprising at least one pump, a spoolable composite pipe comprising a fluid channel and at least one energy conductor, and a distal connection device. The distal connection device is adapted to couple a distal end of the fluid channel to the at least one pump and couple a distal end of the at least one energy conductor to the downhole fluid control system.
In one embodiment, the energy conductor includes at least one of a power conductor and a data conductor. The power conductor may include at least one of an electrical power conductor and a hydraulic power conductor. The data conductor may include at least one of a fiber-optic cable and an electrically conductive cable. In one embodiment, the electrically conductive cable includes copper.
The spoolable composite pipe may include a plurality of layers, including, for example, a substantially fluid impervious inner layer, a composite layer enclosing the inner layer and comprising high strength fibers, and an outer protective layer enclosing the composite layer and inner liner. The substantially fluid impervious inner layer may define the fluid channel. In one embodiment, the at least one energy conductor is embedded within at least one layer of the spoolable composite pipe. The at least one energy conductor may be helically wound around at least one inner layer of the spoolable composite pipe, or may extend substantially parallel with an elongate axis of the spoolable composite pipe.
In one embodiment, the spoolable composite pipe includes at least one reinforcing element. The pipe may be designed so that the total elongation of the pipe under maximum load conditions is always less than the elongation to failure of any integrated conductor. The spoolable composite pipe may include a bonding element. In one embodiment, the bonding element is adapted to provide load transfer between the at least one energy conductor and at least one layer of the spoolable composite pipe.
In one embodiment, the downhole fluid control system includes a measurement device. The measurement device may include at least one of a flow meter, a pressure meter, a temperature meter, a stress meter, a strain gauge, and a chemical composition measuring device.
In one embodiment, the system further includes a proximal connection device adapted to connect a proximal end of the spoolable composite pipe to external pipework above a wellhead. The proximal connection device may be adapted to be seated within the wellhead. The system may further include a sealed wireway adapted to allow breakout of a proximal end of the at least one energy conductor from a wellhead.
In one embodiment, the system may include at least one power element coupled to the proximal end of the energy conductor. In one embodiment, the system may include at least one of a communication device and a control device coupled to the proximal end of the energy conductor. In one embodiment, the system may include a spooling system adapted to at least one of deploy and remove the spoolable composite pipe. In one embodiment, the distal connection device is adapted to at least one of provide fluid pressure integrity and transfer tensile loads.
The downhole fluid control system may further include at least one fluid separation device. The fluid separation device may be adapted to separate a fluid mixture passing through the downhole fluid control system into at least one first fluid and at least one second fluid. The at least one first fluid may be directed into the fluid channel of the spoolable composite pipe. The at least one second fluid may be directed into an underground formation.
Another aspect of the invention includes a method of providing a fluid separation system at a below ground location in a wellhole. The method includes providing a spoolable composite pipe comprising a fluid channel and at least one energy conductor, providing a downhole fluid control system comprising at least one pump, coupling a distal end of the fluid channel to at least one of the pump and the water separation device, coupling a distal end of the at least one energy conductor to the downhole fluid control system, and unspooling the spoolable composite pipe from a reel to deploy the downhole fluid control system down a wellhole.
In one embodiment, the method further includes connecting a proximal end of the spoolable composite pipe to external pipework above a wellhead. In one embodiment, the method further includes coupling at least one power element to the proximal end of the energy conductor. In one embodiment, the method further includes coupling at least one of a communication device and a control device to the proximal end of the energy conductor. In one embodiment, the downhole fluid control system includes at least one fluid separation device, wherein the fluid separation device is adapted to separate a fluid mixture passing through the downhole fluid control system into at least one first fluid and at least one second fluid.
Another aspect of the invention includes a method of separating fluids at a below ground location in a wellhole. The method includes positioning a fluid control system comprising at least one pump and at least one fluid separation device at a below ground location in a wellhole, connecting the fluid control system to an above-ground location through a spoolable composite pipe comprising a fluid channel and at least one energy conductor, providing at least one of a power supply or a control signal to the fluid control system through the at least one energy conductor, passing a fluid mixture through the fluid control system, separating the fluid mixture into at least one first fluid and at least one second fluid, pumping the first fluid to the surface through the fluid channel, and releasing the second fluid to an underground formation.
The first fluid may include at least one of oil-rich fluid and a gas-rich fluid. The second fluid may include a water-rich fluid. The fluid control system may be connected to the spoolable composite pipe prior to positioning the fluid control system at the below ground location in the wellhole. In one embodiment, the energy conductor comprises at least one of a power conductor and a data conductor. The power supply provided to the fluid control system may include at least one of an electrical power conductor and a hydraulic power conductor.
In one embodiment, the data conductor includes at least one of a fiber-optic cable and an electrically conductive cable. The electrically conductive cable may include copper. In one embodiment, both power supply and control signals are provided to the fluid control system through separate energy conductors. The method may further include connecting a proximal end of the spoolable composite pipe to external pipework above a wellhead.
In one embodiment, the spoolable composite pipe includes a plurality of layers including, for example, a substantially fluid impervious inner layer, a composite layer enclosing the inner layer and comprising high strength fibers, and an outer protective layer enclosing the composite layer and inner liner. The substantially fluid impervious inner layer may define the fluid channel.
In one embodiment, the at least one energy conductor is embedded within at least one layer of the spoolable composite pipe. The at least one energy conductor may be helically wound around the at least one inner layer of the spoolable composite pipe, or extend substantially parallel with an elongate axis of the spoolable composite pipe.
In one embodiment, the method further includes measuring at least one property of the fluid mixture passing through the fluid control system. The measuring step may include measuring at least one property of the fluid with at least one of a flow meter, a pressure meter, a temperature meter, a stress meter, a strain gauge, and a chemical composition measuring device.
These and other objects, along with advantages and features of the present invention, will become apparent through reference to the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the claims. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the features of the various embodiments described herein are not mutually exclusive and may exist in various combinations and permutations.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the following description, various embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, in which:
To provide an overall understanding, certain illustrative embodiments will now be described; however, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the systems and methods described herein can be adapted and modified to provide systems and methods for other suitable applications and that other additions and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the systems and methods described herein.
Unless otherwise specified, the illustrated embodiments can be understood as providing exemplary features of varying detail of certain embodiments, and therefore, unless otherwise specified, features, components, modules, and/or aspects of the illustrations can be otherwise combined, separated, interchanged, and/or rearranged without departing from the disclosed systems or methods. Additionally, the shapes and sizes of components are also exemplary and unless otherwise specified, can be altered without affecting the scope of the disclosed and exemplary systems or methods of the present disclosure.
One embodiment of the invention includes a spoolable pipe that provides a path for conducting fluids (i.e., liquids and gases) along the length of the spoolable pipe. For example, the spoolable pipe can transmit fluids down a well hole for operations upon the interior surfaces of the well hole, the spoolable pipe can transmit fluids or gases to hydraulic or pneumatic machines operably coupled to the spoolable pipe, and/or the spoolable pipe can be used to transmit fluids on surface from well holes to transmission or distribution pipelines. Accordingly, the spoolable pipe can provide a conduit for powering and controlling hydraulic and/or pneumatic machines, and/or act as a conduit for fluids, for example gases or liquids.
The internal pressure barrier 12, otherwise referred to as a liner, can serve as a pressure containment member to resist leakage of internal fluids from within the spoolable pipe 10. In some embodiments, the internal pressure barrier 12 can include a polymer, a thermoset plastic, a thermoplastic, an elastomer, a rubber, a co-polymer, and/or a composite. The composite can include a filled polymer and a nano-composite, a polymer/metallic composite, and/or a metal (e.g., steel, copper, and/or stainless steel). Accordingly, an internal pressure barrier 12 can include one or more of a high density polyethylene (HDPE), a cross-linked polyethylene (PEX), a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), a polyamide, polyethylene terphthalate, polyphenylene sulfide and/or a polypropylene. In one embodiment, the internal pressure barrier 12 includes a modulus of elasticity greater than about approximately 50,000 psi, and/or a strength greater than about approximately 1,000 psi. In some embodiments, the internal pressure barrier 12 can carry at least fifteen percent of the axial load along the longitudinal axis, at least twenty-five percent of the axial load along the longitudinal axis, or at least thirty percent of the axial load along the longitudinal axis at a termination, while in some embodiments, the internal pressure barrier 12 can carry at least fifty percent of the axial load along the longitudinal axis at a termination. Axial load may be determined at the ends of a pipe. For example, at the ends, or a termination, of a pipe, there may be a tensile (e.g. axial) load equal to the internal pressure multiplied by the area of the pipe.
Referring back to
Exemplary fibers include but are not limited to graphite, KEVLAR, fiberglass, boron, polyester fibers, polymer fibers, mineral based fibers such as basalt fibers, and aramid. For example, fibers can include glass fibers that comprise e-cr glass, Advantex®, s-glass, d-glass, or a corrosion resistant glass.
The reinforcing layer(s) 14 can be formed of a number of plies of fibers, each ply including fibers. In one embodiment, the reinforcing layer(s) 14 can include two plies, which can optionally be counterwound unidirectional plies. The reinforcing layer(s) can include two plies, which can optionally be wound in about equal but opposite helical directions. The reinforcing layer(s) 14 can include four, eight, or more plies of fibers, each ply independently wound in a helical orientation relative to the longitudinal axis. Plies may have a different helical orientation with respect to another ply, or may have the same helical orientation. The reinforcing layer(s) 14 may include plies and/or fibers that have a partially and/or a substantially axial orientation. The reinforcing layer may include plies of fibers with an abrasion resistant material disposed between each ply, or optionally disposed between only certain plies. In some embodiments, an abrasion resistant layer is disposed between plies that have a different helical orientation.
The fibers can include structural fibers and flexible yarn components. The structural fibers can be formed of carbon, aramid, thermoplastic, and/or glass. The flexible yarn components, or braiding fibers, can be formed of either polyamide, polyester, aramid, thermoplastic, glass and/or ceramic. The fibers included in the reinforcing layer(s) 14 can be woven, braided, knitted, stitched, circumferentially (axially) wound, helically wound, and/or other textile form to provide an orientation as provided herein (e.g., in the exemplary embodiment, with an orientation between substantially about thirty degrees and substantially about seventy degrees relative to the longitudinal axis 17). The fibers can be biaxially or triaxially braided.
In one embodiment, the reinforcing layer(s) 14 includes fibers having a modulus of elasticity of greater than about 5,000,000 psi, and/or a strength greater than about 100,000 psi. In some embodiments, an adhesive can be used to bond the reinforcing layer(s) 14 to internal pressure barrier 12. In other embodiments, one or more reinforcing layers are substantially not bonded to one or more of other layers, such as the inner liner, internal pressure barriers, or external outer protective layer(s).
The fibers in each of the reinforcing layers 14A-C can be selected from the same or different material. For example, the first reinforcing layer 14A can comprise helically oriented glass fibers; second reinforcing layer 14B can comprise a ply having helically oriented glass fiber at the same angle, but at an opposite orientation of the first reinforcing layer 14A; and third reinforcing layer 14C can comprise plies of fibers having a clockwise and counter-clockwise helically oriented glass fibers. Further, the different reinforcing layers 14A-C can include different angles of helical orientation. For example, in one embodiment, the different layers can have angles of orientation between substantially about thirty degrees and substantially about seventy degrees, relative to the axis 17. Alternatively, the different layers can have angles of orientation between substantially about forty-six degrees and substantially about fifty-two degrees, relative to the axis 17. In some embodiments, the different layers 14A-C can have more than one fiber within a layer, such as carbon and glass, and/or carbon and aramid, and/or glass and aramid. Further, the different layers 14A-C may each comprise multiple plies, each independent ply having a different, or substantially the same, helical orientation with respect to other plies within a layer.
The fibers in each of plies 114A, B can be selected from the same or different material. For example, the ply 114A can comprise at least partially helically oriented glass fibers; second ply 114B can comprise a ply having at least partially helically oriented glass fiber at the same angle, but at an opposite orientation of the first ply 114A. Further, the plies 114A, B can include different angles of helical orientation. For example, in one embodiment, the different plies can have angles of orientation between substantially about thirty degrees and substantially about seventy degrees, relative to the axis 17. Alternatively, the different plies can have angles of orientation between substantially about forty-six degrees and substantially about fifty-two degrees, relative to the axis 17. For example, one ply 114A may comprise fibers with helical orientation of about ±40°, ±45°, ±50°, ±55°, and/or ±60°, and a second ply 114B may comprise fibers with about an equal but opposite orientation. One or more plies, or one or more fibers within a ply may be substantially axially oriented. Further, the plies 114A, B can include about the same angle of helical orientation. In some embodiments, the different plies 114A, B can have more than one fiber within a ply, such as carbon and glass, and/or carbon and aramid, and/or glass and aramid.
In some embodiments, the abrasion resistant layer 120 may include a polymer. Such abrasion resistant layers can include a tape or coating or other abrasion resistant material, such as a polymer. Polymers may include polyethylene such as, for example, high-density polyethylene and cross-linked polyethylene, polyvinylidene fluoride, polyamide, polypropylene, terphthalates such as polyethylene therphthalate, and polyphenylene sulfide. For example, the abrasion resistant layer may include a polymeric tape that includes one or more polymers such as a polyester, a polyethylene, cross-linked polyethylene, polypropylene, polyethylene terphthalate, high-density polypropylene, polyamide, polyvinylidene fluoride, polyamide, and a elastomer. An exemplary pipe as in
The external layer(s) 56 can provide wear resistance and impact resistance. For example, the external layer 56 can provide abrasion resistance and wear resistance by forming an outer surface to the spoolable pipe that has a low coefficient of friction thereby reducing the wear on the reinforcing layers from external abrasion. Further, the external layer 56 can provide a seamless layer, to, for example, hold the inner layers 12, 14 of the coiled spoolable pipe 10 together. The external layer 56 can be formed of a filled or unfilled polymeric layer. Alternatively, the external layer 56 can be formed of a fiber, such as aramid or glass, with or without a matrix. Accordingly, the external layer 56 can be a polymer, thermoset plastic, a thermoplastic, an elastomer, a rubber, a co-polymer, and/or a composite, where the composite includes a filled polymer and a nano-composite, a polymer/metallic composite, and/or a metal. In some embodiments, the external layer(s) 56 can include one or more of high density polyethylene (HDPE), a cross-linked polyethylene (PEX), a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), a polyamide, polyethylene terphthalate, polyphenylene sulfide and/or a polypropylene. The external layer 56 can include a modulus of elasticity greater than about approximately 50,000 psi, and/or a strength greater than about approximately 1,000 psi. In an embodiment, the external layer 56 can carry at least ten percent, twenty percent, twenty-five percent, thirty percent or even at least fifty percent of an axial load in the longitudinal direction at a termination. A seamless external layer can comprise, for example, a perforated thermoplastic.
In some embodiments, the external layer 56 can be formed by extruding, while the layer 56 can be formed using one or more materials applied at least partially helically and/or at least partially axially along the longitudinal axis 17. The material can include, for example, one or more polymeric tapes. In an example embodiment, the external layer 56 can include and/or otherwise have a coefficient of friction less than a coefficient of friction of a reinforcing layer 14.
Particles can be added to the external layer 56 to increase the wear resistance of the external layer 56. The particles used can include one or more of ceramics, metallics, polymerics, silicas, or fluorinated polymers. For example, adding TEFLON (MP 1300) particles and an aramid powder (PD-T polymer) to the external layer 56 can reduce friction and enhance wear resistance.
It can be understood that pressure from fluids transported by the spoolable pipes 10 disclosed herein may not be properly released from the reinforcing layer(s) 14, and/or from the inner pressure barrier liner and/or from within the external layer, without, for example, an external layer having a permeability to provide such pressure release. Such accumulation of pressure can cause deterioration of the spoolable pipe 10, for example, external layer rupture or inner pressure barrier collapse. Accordingly, in some embodiments, to allow for pressure release along the length of the spoolable pipe 10, the external layer(s) 56 can include and/or have a permeability at least five, or at least ten times greater than the permeability of the internal pressure barrier 12. For example, external layer(s) 56 include perforations or holes spaced along the length of pipe. Such perforations can, for example, be spaced apart about every 10 ft, about every 20 ft, about every 30 ft, and even about or greater than about every 40 ft. In one embodiment, the external layer 56 can be perforated to achieve a desired permeability, while additionally and optionally, an external layer 56 can include one or more polymeric tapes, and/or may be discontinuous.
One example spoolable pipe 10 can also include one or more couplings or fittings. For example, such couplings may engage with, be attached to, or in contact with one or more of the internal and external layers of a pipe, and may act as a mechanical load transfer device. Couplings may engage one or both of the inner liner, the external wear layer or the reinforcing layer. Couplings or fittings may be comprised, for example, of metal or a polymer, or both. In some embodiments, such couplings may allow pipes to be coupled with other metal components. In addition, or alternatively, such couplings or fittings may provide a pressure seal or venting mechanism within or external to the pipe. One or more couplings may each independently be in fluid communication with the inner layer and/or in fluid communication with one or more reinforcing layers and/or plies of fibers or abrasion resistant layers, and/or in fluid communication with an external layer. Such couplings may provide venting, to the atmosphere, of any gasses or fluids that may be present in any of the layers between the external layer and the inner layer, inclusive.
With reference to
The disclosed energy conductors 62 can be oriented in at least a partially helical direction relative to a longitudinal 17 axis of the spoolable pipe 10, and/or in an axial direction relative to the longitudinal axis 17 of the spoolable pipe 10.
A hydraulic control line embodiment of the energy conductor 62 can be either formed of a metal, composite, and/or a polymeric material.
In one embodiment, several energy conductors 62 can power and/or control a machine operably coupled to the coiled spoolable pipe 10. For instance, a spoolable pipe 10 can include three electrical energy conductors that provide a primary line 62, a secondary line 62, and a tertiary line 62 for electrically powering a machine using a three-phase power system. As provided previously herein, the spoolable pipe 10 can also include internal pressure barriers 12 for transmitting fluids along the length of the pipe 10. Possible machines include, but are not limited to, pumps, fluid separation systems, measurement devices, flow control devices, and/or drilling devices.
In one embodiment of the invention, an energy conductor may be coupled to one or more sensors mounted with the pipe, attached to the pipe, or located at an end of the pipe. In one embodiment, the sensor is a structure that senses either the absolute value or a change in value of a physical quantity. Exemplary sensors for identifying physical characteristics include acoustic sensors, optical sensors, mechanical sensors, electrical sensors, fluidic sensors, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, strain sensors, and chemical sensors.
Optical sensors include intensity sensors that measure changes in the intensity of one or more light beams and interferometric sensors that measure phase changes in light beams caused by interference between beams of light. Optical intensity sensors can rely on light scattering, spectral transmission changes, microbending or radiative losses, reflectance changes, and changes in the modal properties of optical fiber to detect measurable changes. One embodiment of the invention may include an optical chemical sensor to perform remote spectroscopy (either absorption or fluorescence) of a substance.
Optical temperature sensors include those sensors that: remotely monitor blackbody radiation; identify optical path-length changes, via an interferometer, in a material having a known thermal expansion coefficient and refractive index as a function of temperature; monitor absorption characteristics to determine temperature; and monitor fluorescence emission decay times from doped compositions to determine temperature. For instance, optical fibers having a Bragg Grating etched therein can be used to sense temperature with an interferometer technique.
In one embodiment, Bragg Gratings can also be used to measure strain. Particularly, a refractive index grating can be created on a single-mode optical fiber and the reflected and transmitted wavelength of light from the grating can be monitored. The reflected wavelength of light varies as a function of strain induced elongation of the Bragg Grating. Other optical sensors measure strain by stimulated Brillouin scattering and through polarimetry in birefringent materials.
Hybrid sensors including optical fibers can also be fashioned to detect electrical and magnetic fields. Typically, the optical fiber monitors changes in some other material, such as a piezo crystal, that changes as a function of electrical or magnetic fields. For example, the optical fiber can determine dimensional changes of a piezoelectric or piezomagnetic material subjected to electric or magnetic fields, respectively. Bragg Gratings in an optical fiber can also be used to measure high magnetic fields. In particular, the Naval Research Laboratory has identified that the reflectance of a Bragg Grating as a function of wavelength differed for right and left circularly polarized light. The Naval Research Laboratory observed that magnetic fields can be detected by interferometrically reading the phase difference due to the Bragg Grating wavelength shifts.
Fiber optic sensors for measuring current also exist. Hoya Glass and Tokyo Electric Power Co. identified that a single-mode optical fiber made of flint glass (high in lead) can be used to sense current. Current is measured by observing the rotation of polarized light in the optical fiber.
In one embodiment, optical pressure sensors that rely on movable diaphragms, Fabry-Perot interferometers, or microbending, may be utilized. The movable diaphragm typically senses changes in pressure applied across the diaphragm using piezoresistors mounted on the diaphragm. The resistance of the piezoresistors varies as the diaphragm flexes in response to various pressure levels. The Fabry-Perot interferometers can include one two parallel reflecting surfaces wherein one of the surfaces moves in response to pressure changes. The interferometers then detect the movement of the surface by comparing the interference patterns formed by light reflecting of the moving surface. Microbending sensors can be formed of two opposing serrated plates that bend the fiber in response to the pressure level. The signal loss in the fiber resulting from the movement of the opposing serrated plates can be measured, thereby sensing displacement and pressure change.
Various optical sensors exist for measuring displacement and position. Simple optical sensors measure the change in retroreflectance of light passing through an optical fiber. The change in retroflectance occurs as a result of movement of a proximal mirror surface.
Additionally, optical sensors can be employed to measure acoustics and vibration. For example, an optical fiber can be wrapped around a compliant cylinder. Changes in acoustic waves or vibrations flex the cylinder and in turn stress the coil of optical fiber. The stress on the optical fiber can be measured interferometrically and is representative of the acoustic waves or vibrations impacting the cylinder.
Mechanical sensors suitable for deployment in the composite tubular member 10 include piezoelectric sensors, vibration sensors, position sensors, velocity sensors, strain gauges, and acceleration sensors. The sensor can also be selected from those electrical sensors, such as current sensors, voltage sensors, resistivity sensors, electric field sensors, and magnetic field sensors. Fluidic sensors appropriate for selection as the sensor include flow rate sensors, fluidic intensity sensors, and fluidic density sensors. Additionally, the sensor can be selected to be a pressure sensor, such as an absolute pressure sensor or a differential pressure sensor. For example, the sensor can be a semiconductor pressure sensor having a moveable diaphragm with piezoresistors mounted thereon.
The sensor can be also selected to be a temperature sensor. Temperature sensors include thermocouples, resistance thermometers, and optical pyrometers. A thermocouple makes use of the fact that junctions between dissimilar metals or alloys in an electrical circuit give rise to a voltage if they are at different temperatures. The resistance thermometer consists of a coil of fine wire. Copper wires lead from the fine wire to a resistance measuring device. As the temperature varies the resistance in the coil of fine wire changes.
One embodiment of the invention may utilize a spoolable composite pipe including one or more energy conductors, as described herein, to connect to and at least one of power, operate, monitor, and control a downhole fluid control system at a below ground location in a wellhole. These downhole fluid control systems may, for example, include one or more pumps and/or one or more fluid separation devices for using in downhole well systems. The fluid separation devices may, for example, include downhole oil/water separators (DOWS) and/or downhole gas/water separators (DGWS).
In one example embodiment, a spoolable composite pipe including one or more energy conductors may be connected to a DOWS system. DOWS technology reduces the quantity of produced water that is handled at the surface by separating it from the oil downhole and simultaneously injecting it underground. A DOWS system may include, for example, an oil/water separation system and at least one pump to lift oil to the surface and inject the water. Two basic types of DOWS systems have been developed, one that uses hydrocyclones to mechanically separate oil and water, and the other relies on gravity separation that takes place in the well bore.
Hydrocyclones use centrifugal force to separate fluids of different specific gravity. They operate without any moving parts. A mixture of oil and water enters the hydrocyclone at a high velocity from the side of a conical chamber. The subsequent swirling action causes the heavier water to move to the outside of the chamber and exit through one end, while the lighter oil remains in the interior of the chamber and exits through a second opening. The water fraction, containing a low concentration of oil (typically less than 500 mg/L), can then be injected, and the oil fraction along with some water is pumped to the surface. The Hydrocyclone-type DOWS may be coupled with pumps, such as electric submersible pumps (ESPs), progressing cavity pumps, gas lift pumps, and rod pumps.
Gravity separator-type DOWS are designed to allow the oil droplets that enter a well bore through perforations to rise and form a discrete oil layer in the well. Most gravity separator tools are vertically oriented and have two intakes, one in the oil layer and the other in the water layer. This type of DOWS may use rod pumps, although other types of pump, including, but not limited to as electric submersible pumps (ESPs), progressing cavity pumps, gas lift pumps, may also be used. As the sucker rods move up and down, the oil is lifted to the surface and the water is injected. In an alternative embodiment, a gravity-separation DOWS that works by allowing gravity separation to occur in the horizontal section of an extended reach well may also be used. The downhole conditions allow for rapid separation of oil and water. Oil is lifted to the surface, while water is injected by a hydraulic submersible pump.
In another example embodiment, a spoolable composite pipe including one or more energy conductors may be connected to a DGWS system. Since the difference in specific gravity between natural gas and water is large, allowing separation to occur more easily in the well, the purpose of the DGWS is not so much one of separation of the fluid streams but of disposing the water downhole while allowing gas production. This technology is somewhat different than DOWS technology, for which the fluid separation component is very important.
DGWS technologies can be classified into four main categories: bypass tools, modified plunger rod pumps, ESPs, and progressive cavity pumps. The particular DGWS system most appropriate for a particular application may depend on factors including, but not limited to, the depth involved, the specific application, produced water rates, and well depth.
Bypass tools are installed at the bottom of a rod pump. On the upward pump stroke, water is drawn from the casing-piping annulus into the pump chamber through a set of valves. On the next downward stroke, these valves close and another set of valves opens, allowing the water to flow into the piping. Water accumulates in the piping until it reaches a sufficient hydrostatic head so that it can flow by gravity to a disposal formation. The pump provides no pressure for water injection; water flows solely by gravity. Bypass tools may be appropriate, for example, for water volumes from 25 to 250 bbl/d and for depths up to approximately 8,000 ft.
Modified plunger rod pump systems incorporate a rod pump, which has its plunger modified to act as a solid assembly, and an extra section of pipe with several sets of valves located below the pump. On the upward pump stroke, the plunger creates a vacuum and draws water into the pump barrel. On the downward stroke, the plunger forces water out of the pump barrel to a disposal zone. This type of DGWS can generate higher pressure than the bypass tool, which is useful for injecting into a wide range of injection zones. Modified plunger rod pump systems may, in one embodiment, be well suited for moderate to high water volumes (250 to 800 bbl/d) and depths from 2,000 to 8,000 ft.
ESPs may, in one embodiment, be used in the petroleum industry to lift fluids to the surface. In a DGWS application, they can be configured to discharge downward to a lower injection zone. A packer is used to isolate the producing and injection zones. ESPs can, in one embodiment, handle flow rates greater than 800 bbl/d, and can operate at great depths (more than 6,000 ft).
The fourth type of DGWS uses progressive cavity pumps (also referred to as progressing cavity pumps). This type of pump has been used throughout the petroleum industry. For DGWS applications, the pump is configured to discharge downward to an injection zone, or the pump rotor can be designed to turn in a reversed direction. In an alternate configuration, the progressive cavity pump can be used with a bypass tool. Then the pump would push water into the piping, and the water would flow by gravity to the injection formation. Progressive cavity pumps can, in one embodiment, handle solids (e.g., sand grains or scale) more readily than rod pumps or ESPs.
One embodiment of the invention provides an integrated and spoolable pipe incorporating at least one of a fluid channel and one or more energy conductors (such as, but not limited to, one or more power conductors and/or one or more data conductors) for incorporation into a downhole fluid control system. The spoolable pipe may include any of the elements described hereinabove, and may be used with any of the DOWS and/or DGWS described herein, or for any other appropriate downhole fluid control system including elements such as, but not limited to, pumps, measurement devices, fluid separation devices, fluid control devices, and/or drilling devices.
Using such spoolable composite pipes including both a fluid channel and at least one integrated energy conductor provides significant advantages over prior downhole fluid control systems. These advantages may include, but are not limited to, easier installation, easier operation, easier removal, and/or improved reliability of downhole separation systems, and/or significantly reduced costs related with the installation, use, maintenance, and removal of such systems. These lower costs not only increase the viability of downhole separation in existing wells, but also promote viability of wells which cannot be cost-effectively drilled or completed by any other method. More particularly, a downhole fluid control system coupled to a spoolable pipe with integrated energy conductor(s) may enable the commercial viability of downhole separation in even marginal wells by providing, for example, a simpler and lower cost installation and removal system, protection of the energy conductor(s) during installation and removal for better reliability, simple downhole metering with incorporated power and data channels to the surface to meet regulatory requirements, and/or improved control of downhole equipment for better reliability and longer well life.
One example embodiment of the invention may include, for example, a system for operating and controlling a downhole fluid control system including one or more downhole pumps, one or more metering devices, one or more fluid separation devices, a spoolable composite pipe fluid channel and integrated energy conductor(s). The system may further include a connection device on the bottom of the pipe to couple the fluid channel to the downhole device(s) and/or to couple the energy conductor(s) from the pipe to the downhole devices. The system may further include a connection device placed on the top of the pipe to connect the pipe to the external pipework above the well head and to seat in the wellhead, and/or to connect the energy conductor(s) to a sealed wireway to allow breakout of the energy conductor(s) from the wellhead. One embodiment of the invention may further include equipment to control spooling of the system into and/or out of the well when required.
In one embodiment, the integrated energy conductor(s) may include any combination of power conductors, data conductors (such as, but not limited to, electrical conductors and/or fiber optics). These integrated energy conductor(s) can be positioned along an elongate axis of the pipe or helically wound around a pipe as described above.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a composite spoolable pipe, such as any one of the spoolable pipes described herein, which incorporates copper conductors and/or fiber optics which are used to transmit electrical power and data signals. This integrated spoolable pipe is connected directly to downhole fluid control system elements, such as, but not limited to, downhole pumps and/or flow separators, by connectors which provide fluid pressure integrity and transfer tensile loads.
In one embodiment, the spoolable pipe may be transported on a reel and connected to the downhole systems and devices. The complete system may be installed by spooling equipment which lowers the assembly into the well in a single operation. Similarly the complete assembly can be removed by spooling when required for maintenance or repair. Alternatively, the spoolable pipe may be deployed down a wellhole to be coupled to a pre-deployed downhole fluid control system.
An example spoolable pipe 200 for coupling to a downhole fluid control system is shown in
The pipe 200 includes a plurality of energy conductors 208 embedded within the outer protective barrier layer 206. The energy conductors 208 are embedded within the outer protective barrier layer 206 substantially parallel with the elongate axis of the pipe 200. In an alternative embodiment, the energy conductors 208 are embedded substantially helically about the elongate axis of the pipe 200 within the outer protective barrier layer 206. In an alternative embodiment, one or more of the energy conductors 208 may be embedded within a different layer of the pipe 200, and/or be embedded between two layers of the pipe 200.
In one embodiment of the invention, each of the plurality of energy conductors may provide a different function for the downhole fluid control system. These functions may include, but are not limited to, providing power to a pump, fluid separation device, measurement device, and/or other downhole fluid control system element, provide a control signal to a pump, fluid separation device, measurement device, and/or other downhole fluid control system element, and/or provide a data conductor to transport a data signal from a pump, fluid separation device, measurement device, and/or other downhole fluid control system element to the top of the wellhole. The power conductor(s) may include an electrical power conductor and/or a hydraulic power conductor. In one embodiment, an electrical power conductor may be manufactured from copper.
The energy conductors 208 may, in one embodiment, include a cover 209. This cover 209 may provide protection for the energy conductors 208. In one embodiment, the covers 209 are color coded, or otherwise marked, to assist in the correct connection of each energy conductor 208 to its appropriate element.
In alternative embodiments of the invention, multiple energy conductors 208 may be adapted to provide the same function, thereby providing additional backup energy paths for one element of the downhole fluid control system. In one embodiment, one or more energy conductors 208 may be adapted to provide multiple functions, such as, but not limited to, providing a path for both a control signal to a downhole fluid control system element and providing a path for a data signal from the downhole fluid control system element back to the surface. In an alternative embodiment, a greater or lesser number of energy conductors 208 may be used. In further alternative embodiments, any appropriate combination of energy conductors may be integrated into the spoolable pipe 200.
The connection device 210 includes a second connection end 214 adapted to allow the connection device 210 to be coupled to another element such as, but not limited to, another spoolable pipe 200, a pump, a fluid separation device, or any other appropriate element. The second connection end 214 may include a threaded portion, a knurled portion, or any other appropriate mating element allowing the connection device 210 to be releasably connected.
The connection device 210 is configured to provide a fluid connection for the interior fluid channel 203, while allowing the energy conductors 208 to extend around the outside of the connection device 210. In an alternative embodiment, the connection device may include additional paths for extension of the energy conductors 208 therethrough.
In use, the mounting 220 provides a means for coupling a distal end of the spoolable pipe 200 to a downhole fluid control system, such as, but not limited to, a pump, a DOWS and/or a DGWS. The mounting 220 also provides an example means of coupling a proximal end of the spoolable pipe 200 to a fluid control system, power system, and/or measurement system at the wellhead (i.e. at or near the surface of the wellhole). The mounting 220 may be adapted to be mounted to a structural support at the wellhead, thereby providing a stable anchor for the downhole fluid control system.
The water-based fluid is then transported, by a gravity and/or pump based mechanism to a discharge zone at a distal end 236 of the downhole fluid separation system 230. A pump 234, located near the distal end of the downhole fluid separation system 230, is then used to pump the water-based fluid through a pump intake 242 out of the distal end 236 of the downhole fluid separation system 230 into a disposal zone of the surrounding rock formation. A barrier seal manifold (BSM tool) 244 is located at the pump intake 242.
The gas, after being separated from the water-based fluid, passes upwards towards a proximal end 238 of the downhole fluid separation system 230 past a downhole stuffing box (DSB Tool) 240 and into a spoolable pipe 200 for transport to the surface. The downhole stuffing box 240 is used, for example to provide an axial seal around a rod string driving a downhole pump.
An isolation packer 246 may be located near the distal end 236 of the downhole fluid separation system 230 to prevent the water-based fluid being discharged into the disposal zone 248 of the rock formation from flowing back up the wellhole.
In one embodiment, a metering device 258 may be placed at the distal end 236 of the downhole fluid separation system 230 to measure the volume of water-based fluid being injected into the disposal zone 248. As discussed above, this metering device 258 may be coupled to one or more energy conductors 208 of the spoolable pipe 200, thereby allowing the metering device 258 to communicate with a recording device at the surface, and/or be powered by a powering device at the surface.
In one embodiment of the invention, a second isolation packer 252 may be located at the proximal end 238 of the downhole fluid separation system 230 to prevent fluid flow up the wellhole in the annulus between the spoolable pipe 200 and the casing 254 of the wellhole, and thereby forcing the produced gas into the fluid channel 203 of the spoolable pipe 200 through the inlets ports 256 in a zonal isolation seal/cross-over at the proximal end 238 of the downhole fluid separation system 230 and through the coupling connector 210. This may be advantageous, for example, in embodiments where the produced gas is corrosive and would damage steel casing (outer most tubular). Corrosive materials may include, but are not limited to, gas with CO2, H2S, brines, moisture rich material, or other materials corrosive to metal used as standard in casing. In one embodiment, an area above the fluid producing zone, between the production piping and casing, may be filled with a fluid to protect the casing, e.g. a steel casing, from corrosion. In addition, since there may be corrosive fluids below the fluid producing zone, a liner may be used to protect the casing in that zone. In one embodiment, water, or another fluid, may be held within a discrete section of the wellhole above the gas producing zone by using additional isolation packers and/or cross-over devices. For example, in one embodiment a third isolation may be positioned above the second isolation packer 252, with a cross-over device providing fluid access thereto, such that water may be injected into a discrete section of the wellhole bounded by the second isolation packer 252 and third isolation packer. This may be of use, for example, in embodiments where the water-based fluid disposal zone is above the gas producing zone.
In an alternative embodiment, where it is acceptable for produced gas to flow up the annulus between the casing 254 and the spoolable pipe 200 (e.g. when the produced gas is non-corrosive), no upper isolation packer 252, or cross-over device, is required. In this embodiment, the gas may be allowed to flow up within the annulus between the casing 254 and the spoolable pipe 200 to the surface.
In one embodiment, the downhole fluid separation system may include additional elements, such as, but not limited to, sensors, valves, and/or power/date conduits. As described above, these sensors, valves, and/or power/date conduits may be control and/or powered by an energy signal transported to the element along one or more of the energy conductors integrated within the spoolable pipe and described herein. In one example embodiment, a fluid flow metering device is integrated into the downhole fluid separation system 230 to measure the quantity of fluid passing through the system 230. This metering device may be powered by, and communicate with, a surface device through one or more energy conductors 208.
In the embodiment of
One embodiment of the invention may include a downhole fluid separation system coupled to a spoolable pipe with integrated energy conductors that may be used for deep wells (i.e. wells extending up to, or more than, 10,000 ft from the surface. Such deep well configurations may include spoolable pipe that incorporates selective reinforcement of the pipe structure to maintain the integrity of the pipe over extended distances, and to allow the pipe to support its own weight, the weight of the fluid passing therein, and possible even the weight of the downhole fluid separation system to which it is coupled.
For example, in one embodiment selectively applied reinforcement may be incorporated into the composite pipe to carry the additional tensile load provided by the weight of the conductors in a vertical application. This selective reinforcement may include, but is not limited to, strengthening elements (such as, but not limited to, ribs, wires, filaments, fibers, or other appropriate elongate strengthening elements) of the same, or different, materials to that of the pipe layers that may extend along an inner and/or outer surface of the pipe, and/or between different layers of the pipe. The reinforcement may extend substantially parallel with an elongate axis of the pipe, and/or be helically wound around the pipe.
The materials for these selective reinforcement elements may include, but are not limited to metal (such as, but not limited to, steel), composite materials, Kevlar™, graphite, boron, or any other appropriate material described herein. This selective reinforcement may be added along the entire length of the spoolable pipe, or along only a portion thereof.
In one embodiment, the spoolable pipe may incorporate lighter materials along its length, or a portion of its length (e.g. a distal end section of the length of the spoolable pipe) to minimize the weight of the pipe, thereby reducing the load on the pipe as it is deployed downhole. Example materials include, but are not limited to, carbon fiber. These lighter materials may be utilized along with, or in place of, reinforcement elements to provide a spoolable pipe with energy conductors that have sufficient strength and structural integrity to be used in deep hole applications.
In one embodiment, appropriate bonding methods may be utilized to ensure sufficient load transfer between the energy conductor(s) and the pipe to allow the pipe to sufficient support the energy conductor(s), thereby preventing damage to the energy conductor(s) during deployment and use. For example, in one embodiment, the selective reinforcement may be adapted to closely match the stress/strain curve of the energy conductor(s) to ensure that there is no relative movement between the pipe and the power cables which could lead to failure or damage of either component.
All publications and patents mentioned herein, including those items listed below, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each individual publication or patent was specifically and individually incorporated by reference. In case of conflict, the present application, including any definitions herein, will control.
This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,016,845, U.S. Pat. No. 6,148,866, U.S. Pat. No. 6,286,558, U.S. Pat. No. 6,357,485, U.S. Pat. No. 6,604,550, U.S. Pat. No. 6,857,452, U.S. Pat. No. 5,921,285, U.S. Pat. No. 5,176,180, U.S. Pat. No. 6,004,639, U.S. Pat. No. 6,361,299, U.S. Pat. No. 6,706,348, U.S. Pat. No. 6,663,453, U.S. Pat. No. 6,764,365, U.S. Pat. No. 7,029,356, U.S. Pat. No. 7,234,410, U.S. Pat. No. 7,285,333, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,498,509. This application is also related to US Patent Publication Nos. US2005/0189029, US2007/0125439, US2008/0720029, US2008/0949091, US2008/0721135, and US2009/0278348. All publications and patents mentioned herein, including those items listed above, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if each individual publication or patent was specifically and individually incorporated by reference. In case of conflict, the present application, including any definitions herein, will control.
While specific embodiments of the subject invention have been discussed, the above specification is illustrative and not restrictive. Many variations of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of this specification. The full scope of the invention should be determined by reference to the claims, along with their full scope of equivalents, and the specification, along with such variations.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in this specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention.
The terms “a” and “an” and “the” used in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein is merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range. Unless otherwise indicated herein, each individual value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g. “such as”) provided herein is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element essential to the practice of the invention.
Having described certain embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating the concepts disclosed herein may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as only illustrative and not restrictive.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/146,785, filed Jan. 23, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
87993 | Watson | Mar 1869 | A |
142388 | Goble | Sep 1873 | A |
396176 | Simpson | Jan 1889 | A |
418906 | Bosworth | Jan 1890 | A |
482181 | Kellom | Sep 1892 | A |
646887 | Stowe et al. | Apr 1900 | A |
749633 | Seeley | Jan 1904 | A |
1234812 | Simmons | Jul 1917 | A |
1793455 | Buchanan | Feb 1931 | A |
1890290 | Hargreaves | Dec 1932 | A |
1930285 | Robinson | Oct 1933 | A |
2099407 | Raymond | Nov 1937 | A |
2178931 | Crites | Nov 1939 | A |
2464416 | Raybould | Mar 1949 | A |
2467520 | Brubaker | Apr 1949 | A |
2481001 | Burckle | Sep 1949 | A |
2624366 | Pugh | Jan 1953 | A |
2648720 | Alexander | Aug 1953 | A |
2690769 | Brown | Oct 1954 | A |
2725713 | Blanchard | Dec 1955 | A |
2742931 | De Ganahl | Apr 1956 | A |
2750569 | Moon | Jun 1956 | A |
2810424 | Swartswelter at al. | Oct 1957 | A |
2969812 | De Ganahl | Jan 1961 | A |
2973975 | Ramberg et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
2991093 | Guarnaschelli | Jul 1961 | A |
3086369 | Brown | Apr 1963 | A |
3116760 | Matthews | Jan 1964 | A |
3167125 | Bryan | Jan 1965 | A |
3170137 | Brandt | Feb 1965 | A |
3212528 | Haas | Oct 1965 | A |
3277231 | Downey at al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3306637 | Press at al. | Feb 1967 | A |
3334663 | Peterson | Aug 1967 | A |
3354292 | Kahn | Nov 1967 | A |
3379220 | Kiuchi at al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3383223 | Rose | May 1968 | A |
3390704 | Woodell | Jul 1968 | A |
3413169 | Krings | Nov 1968 | A |
3459229 | Croft | Aug 1969 | A |
3477474 | Mesler | Nov 1969 | A |
3507412 | Carter | Apr 1970 | A |
3522413 | Chrow | Aug 1970 | A |
3526086 | Morgan | Sep 1970 | A |
3554284 | Nystrom | Jan 1971 | A |
3563825 | Segura | Feb 1971 | A |
3579402 | Goldsworthy et al. | May 1971 | A |
3589135 | Ede | Jun 1971 | A |
3589752 | Spencer et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3604461 | Matthews | Sep 1971 | A |
3606396 | Prosdocimo at al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3606402 | Medney | Sep 1971 | A |
3612580 | Jones | Oct 1971 | A |
3654967 | Atwell et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3677978 | Dowbenko et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3685860 | Schmidt | Aug 1972 | A |
3692601 | Goldsworthy et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3696332 | Dickson, Jr. et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3700519 | Carter | Oct 1972 | A |
3701489 | Goldsworthy et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3728187 | Martin | Apr 1973 | A |
3730229 | D'Onofrio | May 1973 | A |
3734421 | Karlson et al. | May 1973 | A |
3738637 | Goldsworthy et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3740285 | Goldsworthy et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3744016 | Davis | Jul 1973 | A |
3769127 | Goldsworthy et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3773090 | Ghersa et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3776805 | Hansen | Dec 1973 | A |
3783060 | Goldsworthy et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3790438 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3814138 | Courtot | Jun 1974 | A |
3817288 | Ball | Jun 1974 | A |
3828112 | Johansen et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3856052 | Feucht | Dec 1974 | A |
3858616 | Thiery et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3860040 | Sullivan | Jan 1975 | A |
3860742 | Medney | Jan 1975 | A |
3866633 | Taylor | Feb 1975 | A |
3901281 | Morrisey | Aug 1975 | A |
3907335 | Burge et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3913624 | Ball | Oct 1975 | A |
3932559 | Cantor et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3933180 | Carter | Jan 1976 | A |
3955601 | Plummer, III | May 1976 | A |
3956051 | Carter | May 1976 | A |
3957410 | Goldsworthy et al. | May 1976 | A |
3960629 | Goldsworthy | Jun 1976 | A |
3963377 | Elliott et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3974862 | Fuhrmann et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3980325 | Robertson | Sep 1976 | A |
RE29112 | Carter | Jan 1977 | E |
4001442 | Stahlberger et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4007070 | Busdiecker | Feb 1977 | A |
4013101 | Logan et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4032177 | Anderson | Jun 1977 | A |
4048807 | Ellers et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4053343 | Carter | Oct 1977 | A |
4057610 | Goettler et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4067916 | Jaeger et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4095865 | Denison et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4104095 | Shaw | Aug 1978 | A |
4108701 | Stanley | Aug 1978 | A |
4111237 | Mutzner et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4111469 | Kavick | Sep 1978 | A |
4114393 | Engle, Jr. et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4119122 | de Putter | Oct 1978 | A |
4125423 | Goldsworthy | Nov 1978 | A |
4133972 | Andersson et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4137949 | Linko, III et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4138178 | Miller et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4139025 | Carlstrom et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4148963 | Bourrain et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4190088 | Lalikos et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4196307 | Moore et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4200126 | Fish | Apr 1980 | A |
4220381 | van der Graaf et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4226446 | Burrington | Oct 1980 | A |
4229613 | Braun | Oct 1980 | A |
4241763 | Antal et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4241787 | Price | Dec 1980 | A |
4248062 | McLain et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4261390 | Belofsky | Apr 1981 | A |
4273160 | Lowles | Jun 1981 | A |
4303263 | Legris | Dec 1981 | A |
4303457 | Johansen et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4306591 | Arterburn | Dec 1981 | A |
4307756 | Voigt et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4308999 | Carter | Jan 1982 | A |
4330017 | Satoh et al. | May 1982 | A |
4336415 | Walling | Jun 1982 | A |
4345784 | Walling | Aug 1982 | A |
4351364 | Cocks et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4380252 | Gray et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4385644 | Kaempen | May 1983 | A |
4402346 | Cheetham et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4417603 | Argy | Nov 1983 | A |
4421806 | Marks et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4422801 | Hale et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4434816 | Di Giovanni et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4445734 | Cunningham | May 1984 | A |
4446892 | Maxwell et al. | May 1984 | A |
4447378 | Gray et al. | May 1984 | A |
4463779 | Wink et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4469729 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4476923 | Walling | Oct 1984 | A |
4488577 | Shilad et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4507019 | Thompson | Mar 1985 | A |
4515737 | Karino et al. | May 1985 | A |
4522058 | Ewing | Jun 1985 | A |
4522235 | Kluss et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4530379 | Policelli | Jul 1985 | A |
4556340 | Morton | Dec 1985 | A |
4567916 | Antal et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4578675 | MacLeod | Mar 1986 | A |
4606378 | Meyer et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4627472 | Goettler et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4652475 | Haney et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4657795 | Foret et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4676563 | Curlett et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4681169 | Brookbank, III | Jul 1987 | A |
4700751 | Fedrick | Oct 1987 | A |
4706711 | Czvikovszky et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4712813 | Passerell et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4728224 | Salama et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4729106 | Rush et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4741795 | Grace et al. | May 1988 | A |
4758455 | Campbell et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4789007 | Cretel et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4842024 | Palinchak | Jun 1989 | A |
4844516 | Baker | Jul 1989 | A |
4849668 | Crawley et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4854349 | Foreman | Aug 1989 | A |
4859024 | Rahman | Aug 1989 | A |
4869293 | Botsolas | Sep 1989 | A |
4903735 | Delacour et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4913657 | Naito et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4936618 | Sampa et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941774 | Harmstorf et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4942903 | Jacobsen et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4972880 | Strand | Nov 1990 | A |
4992787 | Helm | Feb 1991 | A |
4995761 | Barton | Feb 1991 | A |
5024252 | Ochsner | Jun 1991 | A |
5048572 | Levine | Sep 1991 | A |
5072622 | Roach et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077107 | Kaneda et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080560 | LeRoy et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5090741 | Yokomatsu et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5097870 | Williams | Mar 1992 | A |
5123453 | Robbins | Jun 1992 | A |
5156206 | Cox | Oct 1992 | A |
5170011 | Martucci | Dec 1992 | A |
5172765 | Sas-Jaworsky et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176180 | Williams et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5182779 | D'Agostino et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184682 | Delacour et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188872 | Quigley | Feb 1993 | A |
5209136 | Williams | May 1993 | A |
5222769 | Kaempen | Jun 1993 | A |
5257663 | Pringle et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261462 | Wolfe et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265648 | Lyon | Nov 1993 | A |
5285008 | Sas-Jaworsky et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5285204 | Sas-Jaworsky | Feb 1994 | A |
5330807 | Williams | Jul 1994 | A |
5332269 | Homm | Jul 1994 | A |
5334801 | Mohn et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343738 | Skaggs | Sep 1994 | A |
5346658 | Gargiulo | Sep 1994 | A |
5348088 | Laflin et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348096 | Williams | Sep 1994 | A |
5351752 | Wood et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
RE34780 | Trenconsky et al. | Nov 1994 | E |
5364130 | Thalmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5373870 | Derroire et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394488 | Fernald et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5395913 | Bottcher et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5398729 | Spurgat | Mar 1995 | A |
5400602 | Chang et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5416724 | Savic | May 1995 | A |
5423353 | Sorensen | Jun 1995 | A |
5426297 | Dunphy et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428706 | Lequeux et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5435867 | Wolfe et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437311 | Reynolds | Aug 1995 | A |
5437899 | Quigley | Aug 1995 | A |
5443099 | Chaussepied et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452923 | Smith | Sep 1995 | A |
5460416 | Freidrich et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
RE35081 | Quigley | Nov 1995 | E |
5469916 | Sas-Jaworsky et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472764 | Kehr et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5494374 | Youngs et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499661 | Odru et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5507320 | Plumley | Apr 1996 | A |
5524937 | Sides, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5525698 | Bottcher et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5538513 | Okajima et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5551484 | Charboneau | Sep 1996 | A |
5558375 | Newman | Sep 1996 | A |
5622211 | Martin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5641956 | Vengsarkar et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5671811 | Head et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5679425 | Plumley | Oct 1997 | A |
5683204 | Lawther et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692545 | Rodrigue | Dec 1997 | A |
5718956 | Gladfelter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730188 | Kalman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5755266 | Aanonsen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758990 | Davies et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778938 | Chick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785091 | Barker, II | Jul 1998 | A |
5795102 | Corbishley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797702 | Drost et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798155 | Yanagawa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804268 | Mukawa et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826623 | Akiyoshi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828003 | Thomeer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5865216 | Youngs | Feb 1999 | A |
5868169 | Catallo | Feb 1999 | A |
5875792 | Campbell, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902958 | Haxton | May 1999 | A |
5908049 | Williams et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913337 | Williams et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913357 | Hanazaki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921285 | Quigley et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933945 | Thomeer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950651 | Kenworthy et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951812 | Gilchrist, Jr. | Sep 1999 | A |
5979506 | Aarseth | Nov 1999 | A |
5984581 | McGill et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988702 | Sas-Jaworsky | Nov 1999 | A |
6004639 | Quigley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016845 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032699 | Cochran et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065540 | Thomeer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066377 | Tonyali et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076561 | Akedo et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093752 | Park et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6109306 | Kleinert | Aug 2000 | A |
6123110 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6136216 | Fidler et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148866 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
RE37109 | Ganelin | Mar 2001 | E |
6209587 | Hsich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220079 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264244 | Isennock et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286558 | Quigley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315002 | Antal et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328075 | Furuta et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334466 | Jani et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357485 | Quigley et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6357966 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361299 | Quigley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372861 | Schillgalies et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390140 | Niki et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6397895 | Lively | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402430 | Guesnon et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422269 | Johansson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6461079 | Beaujean et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470915 | Enders et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6532994 | Enders et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538198 | Wooters | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557485 | Sauter et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6557905 | Mack et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561278 | Restarick et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6585049 | Leniek, Sr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604550 | Quigley et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620475 | Reynolds, Jr. et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631743 | Enders et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6634387 | Glejbøl et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634388 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6634675 | Parkes | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6663453 | Quigley et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6691781 | Grant et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6706348 | Quigley et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706398 | Revis | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6746737 | Debalme et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764365 | Quigley et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773774 | Crook et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6787207 | Lindstrom et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803082 | Nichols et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807988 | Powell et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807989 | Enders et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6857452 | Quigley et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6868906 | Vail et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6889716 | Lundberg et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902205 | Bouey et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6935376 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6978804 | Quigley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983766 | Baron et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000644 | Ichimura et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7021339 | Hagiwara et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025580 | Heagy et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029356 | Quigley et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7069956 | Mosier | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080667 | McIntyre et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7152632 | Quigley et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7234410 | Quigley et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243716 | Denniel et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7285333 | Wideman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7306006 | Cornell | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7328725 | Henry et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7498509 | Brotzell et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7523765 | Quigley et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7600537 | Bhatnagar et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647948 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
8187687 | Wideman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20010006712 | Hibino et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010013669 | Cundiff et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010025664 | Quigley et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020040910 | Pahl | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020081083 | Griffioen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094400 | Lindstrom et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020119271 | Quigley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020185188 | Quigley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030008577 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030087052 | Wideman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040014440 | Makela et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025951 | Baron et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052997 | Santo | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040074551 | McIntyre | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094299 | Jones | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096614 | Quigley et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040134662 | Chitwood et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040226719 | Morgan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040265524 | Wideman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050087336 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050189029 | Quigley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060000515 | Huffman | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060054235 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060249508 | Teufl et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070125439 | Quigley et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154269 | Quigley et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070187103 | Crichlow | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070246459 | Loveless et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080006337 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080006338 | Wideman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014812 | Quigley et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080164036 | Bullen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185042 | Feechan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210329 | Quigley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090090460 | Wideman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090107558 | Quigley et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090173406 | Quigley et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194293 | Stephenson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090278348 | Brotzell et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100101676 | Quigley et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
559688 | Aug 1957 | BE |
2282358 | Aug 1998 | CA |
461199 | Aug 1968 | CH |
1959738 | Jun 1971 | DE |
3603597 | Aug 1987 | DE |
4040400 | Aug 1992 | DE |
4214383 | Sep 1993 | DE |
19905448 | Aug 2000 | DE |
0024512 | Mar 1981 | EP |
0203887 | Dec 1986 | EP |
352148 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0427306 | May 1991 | EP |
0477704 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0503737 | Sep 1992 | EP |
505815 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0536844 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0681085 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0854029 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0953724 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0970980 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0981992 | Mar 2000 | EP |
989204 | Sep 1951 | FR |
553110 | May 1943 | GB |
809097 | Feb 1959 | GB |
909187 | Oct 1962 | GB |
956500 | Apr 1964 | GB |
1297250 | Nov 1972 | GB |
2103744 | Feb 1983 | GB |
2159901 | Dec 1985 | GB |
2193006 | Jan 1988 | GB |
2255994 | Nov 1992 | GB |
2270099 | Mar 1994 | GB |
2365096 | Feb 2002 | GB |
163 592 | Jun 1990 | JP |
WO-8704768 | Aug 1987 | WO |
WO-9113925 | Sep 1991 | WO |
WO-9221908 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO-9307073 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO-9319927 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO-9502782 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO-9712115 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9712166 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9748932 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO-9919653 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-9961833 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0009928 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0031458 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0073695 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-2006003208 | Jan 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report mailed on Jan. 22, 2001. |
International Search Report mailed on Mar. 5, 2001. |
International Search Report mailed on Nov. 8, 2005. |
Austigard E. and R. Tomter; “Composites Subsea: Cost Effective Products; an Industry Challenge ”, Subsea 94 International Conference, the 1994 Report on Subsea Engineering: The Continuing Challenges. |
Connell Mike et al.; “Coiled Tubing: Application for Today's Challenges”, Petroleum Engineer International, pp. 18-21 (Jul. 1999). |
Feechan Mike et al.; “Spoolable Composites Show Promise”, The American Oil & Gas Reporter, pp. 44-50 (Sep. 1999). |
Fowler Hampton et al.; “Development Update and Applications of an Advanced Composite Spoolable Tubing”, Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston Texas from 4th to 7th of May 1998, pp. 157-162. |
Fowler Hampton; “Advanced Composite Tubing Usable”, The American Oil & Gas Reporter, pp. 76-81 (Sep. 1997). |
Hahn H. Thomas and Williams G. Jerry; “Compression Failure Mechanisms in Unidirectional Composites”. NASA Technical Memorandum pp. 1-42 (Aug. 1984). |
Hansen et al.; “Qualification and Verification of Spoolable High Pressure Composite Service Lines for the Asgard Field Development Project”, paper presented at the 1997 Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston Texas from May 5-8, 1997, pp. 45-54. |
Hartman, D.R., et al., “High Strength Glass Fibers,” Owens Coming Technical Paper (Jul. 1996). |
Haug et al.; “Dynamic Umbilical with Composite Tube (DUCT)”, Paper presented at the 1998 Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston Texas from 4th to 7th, 1998; pp. 699-712. |
Lundberg et al.; “Spin-off Technologies from Development of Continuous Composite Tubing Manufacturing Process”, Paper presented at the 1998 Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas from May 4-7, 1998 pp. 149-155. |
Marker et al.; “Anaconda: Joint Development Project Leads to Digitally Controlled Composite Coiled Tubing Drilling System”, Paper presented at the SPEI/COTA, Coiled Tubing Roundtable held in Houston, Texas from Apr. 5-6, 2000, pp. 1-9. |
Measures et al.; “Fiber Optic Sensors for Smart Structures”, Optics and Lasers Engineering 16: 127-152 (1992). |
Measures R. M.; “Smart Structures with Nerves of Glass”. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 26(4): 289-351 (1989). |
Moe Wood T. et al.; “Spoolable, Composite Piping for Chemical and Water Injection and Hydraulic Valve Operation”, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-I 992-, vol. III, Part A—Materials Engineering, pp. 199-207 (1992). |
Poper Peter; “Braiding”, International Encyclopedia of Composites, Published by VGH, Publishers, Inc., 220 East 23rd Street, Suite 909, New York, NY 10010. |
Quigley et al.; “Development and Application of a Novel Coiled Tubing String for Concentric Workover Services”, Paper presented at the 1997 Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas from May 5-8, 1997, pp. 189-202. |
Rispler K. et al.; “Composite Coiled Tubing in Harsh Completion/Workover Environments”, Paper presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium and Exhibition held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, on Mar. 15-18, 1998, pp. 405-410. |
Sas-Jaworsky II Alex.; “Developments Position CT for Future Prominence”, The American Oil & Gas Reporter, pp. 87-92 (Mar. 1996). |
Sas-Jaworsky II and Bell Steve “Innovative Applications Stimulate Coiled Tubing Development”, World Oil, 217(6): 61 (Jun. 1996). |
Sas-Jaworsky II and Mark Elliot Teel; “Coiled Tubing 1995 Update: Production Applications”, World Oil, 216 (6): 97 (Jun. 1995 ). |
Sas-Jaworsky, A. and J.G. Williams, “Advanced composites enhance coiled tubing capabilities”, World Oil, pp. 57-69 (Apr. 1994). |
Sas-Jaworsky, A. and J.G. Williams, “Development of a composite coiled tubing for oilfield services”, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 26536, pp. 1-11 (1993). |
Sas-Jaworsky, A. and J.G. Williams, “Enabling capabilities and potential applications of composite coiled tubing”, Proceedings of World Oil's 2nd International Conference on Coiled Tubing Technology, pp. 2-9 (1994). |
Shuart J. M. et al.; “Compression Behavior of ≠45o-Dominated Laminates with a Circular Hole or Impact Damage”, AIAA Journal 24(1):115-122 (Jan. 1986). |
Silverman A. Seth; “Spoolable Composite Pipe for Offshore Applications”, Materials Selection & Design pp. 48-50 (Jan. 1997). |
Williams G. J. et al.; “Composite Spoolable Pipe Development, Advancements, and Limitations”, Paper presented at the 2000 Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston Texas from May 1-4, 2000, pp. 1-16. |
Williams, J.G., “Oil Industry Experiences with Fiberglass Components,” Offshore Technology Conference, 1987, pp. 211-220. |
Dalmolen “The Properties, Qualification, and System Design of, and Field Experiences with Reinforced Thermoplastic Pipe for Oil and Gas Applications” NACE International, 2003 West Conference (Feb. 2003). |
Fiberspar Tech Notes, “Horizontal well deliquification just got easier—with Fiberspar Spoolable Production Systems,” TN21-R1UN1-HybridLift, 2010, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/060582 mailed on Feb. 16, 2011 (10 pages). |
Mesch, K.A., “Heat Stabilizers,” Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 2000 pp. 1-20. |
Sperling, L.H., “Introduction to Physical Polymer Science 3rd Edition,” Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 2001, p. 100. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100218944 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61146785 | Jan 2009 | US |