This disclosure related to well logging, and more particularly, to gamma-gamma density logging using a short-lived radioisotopic source created in a downhole tool.
For more than 50 years, accurate measurements of the formation density have been performed using gamma ray scattering in the formation. The traditional gamma-gamma measurement uses a radioisotopic source, typically 137Cs, inserted in the logging tool that emits gamma rays into the formation. The returning gamma rays are measured by one or more gamma ray detectors and an accurate density is determined from the observed count rates. Density logging is one of the most used measurements made in borehole logging. Density information of the formation surrounding a borehole is crucial for an accurate determination of formation porosity and therefore an essential part in the computation of reserves.
Typical gamma ray logging sources have activities of 10 to 100 GBq and their use, transportation, handling and storage have significant implications for safety, tracking and security. It is therefore advantageous to replace the logging source by a radiation emitter that can be controlled and turned off.
Work on x-ray generators for downhole use has been ongoing for decades. Examples of this effort can be found in US Patents for DC x-ray-based and pulsed x-ray sources such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,122,662, 7,638,957, 7,564,948 assigned to Schlumberger. At present, there is no commercially available electronic source of gamma-rays or x-rays that can replace the 137Cs radioisotopic source used for density logging.
There have been proposals to use charged particle reactions such as X(p,p′) X, AX(p,n)A−1X, AXZ(d,n)A+1XZ+1, etc., where X designates an irradiated isotope with mass number A. Most of these charged particle reactions have small cross sections at particle energies <1 MeV, which may be achievable in a downhole tool, and generate gamma rays of energies of several MeV, which are less suited for density measurements because of the drop in the Compton scattering cross section and the increased contribution from electron-positron pair creation.
There is therefore a need to find alternative approaches to generate mono-energetic gamma rays for density logging.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
A first application is directed towards a method of generating gamma rays in a downhole tool through activation of a material surrounding a switchable neutron source. A neutron source is used to generate a radioactive gamma ray emitter in proximity to the neutron emitter through the transmutation of nuclei in the material through neutron reactions. An example is a reaction, in which an energetic incoming neutron interacts with a target nucleus by knocking out a neutron, thus lowering the mass number and the neutron number of the nucleus by one.
A second application is directed towards using the gamma ray source generated through activation as the source of gamma rays for a gamma-gamma density measurement, thus eliminating the need for a long-lived radioisotopic source.
In a third embodiment, the gamma ray density measurement is equipped with additional detectors to allow accurate compensation for activation in the borehole and the formation.
In a forth embodiment, the gamma ray density measurement is combined with neutron measurements using the neutrons from the neutron source for neutron induced nuclear measurements.
In a further embodiment, activated gamma ray source is combined with a gamma ray detector on the opposite side of the mud channel in a logging-while-drilling (LWD) tool, to measure the density of the mud in the mud channel.
The present description is made with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which example embodiments are shown. However, many different embodiments may be used, and thus the description should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers separated by century refer to like elements throughout.
The invention shows ways to overcome the limitations in the generation of gamma-rays using charged particle reactions such as AX(p,p′) AX at charged particle energies <1 MeV that may be achievable in a downhole accelerator. The low cross sections for most charged particle reactions are largely due to the fact that in order to react with the target nucleus the incoming particle needs to overcome the Coulomb barrier, i.e. the repulsive force exerted by the positively charged nucleus on the positively charged incoming particle.
If the incoming particle is a neutron, this issue does not present itself. Generally neutron cross sections for a multitude of neutron interactions are much higher than those found for low energy charged particle interactions. It is therefore advantageous to consider a two-step interaction, in which neutrons are generated by a neutron generator and the neutron beam interacts with a selected target material to generate gamma rays.
It has been proposed in the past that the neutrons generated in such a way could directly generate inelastic or capture gamma rays in a logging tool, which could, in turn, be used for a gamma-gamma density measurement (U.S. Pat. No. 8,440,961). This approach is handicapped by the fact that only a small fraction of the total number of gamma rays is generated in the target in the tool by inelastic or capture reactions. A large part of gamma rays will be generated in other parts of the tool, the surrounding borehole and formation. Therefore, a non-negligible fraction of the gamma rays detected in a detector located in the tool may be caused by a neutron interaction in the tool, borehole, formation or the detector itself.
The above mentioned shortcomings are overcome with the present invention, which uses neutron activation to generate a source of gamma rays in the tool and only a minimal activation signal in the formation. Optimized timing can be used to eliminate any contributions from inelastic and capture gamma rays and to minimize the contribution from activation in the surrounding formation. While the use of activation has been proposed previously (US Patent application 2012/0318968). This invention assumes that generation of activation happens in the 56Fe of the drill collar.
If a d-T generator is used as the source of the activating neutrons, the highest cross sections for activation can be found in AX(n,2n)A−1X reactions. In this reaction, a fast neutron interacts with a nucleus of an isotope with mass number A of an element X in the material surrounding the neutron-emitting target and transforms it into an isotope of the same element with one less neutron and therefore a mass number A−1. For the purpose of this application it is desirable to have a target isotope that has a large abundance, i.e a large isotopic number density (Number of atoms of a given isotope per cm3) and a large activation cross section. The half-life of the activated material should be as short as possible in order to obtain full activation in as short a time as possible. Plot 200 in
where c is a constant, Nn is the number of high energy neutrons emitted by the source and T1/2 the half-life of the isotope generated in the interaction. It takes about 3.3 half-lives to reach 90% of the asymptotic value of the activation 202.
A list of isotopes with large (n,2n) cross sections for 14 MeV (d-T generated) neutrons is provided in table 1. As mentioned above, suitable isotopes are those with a large activation cross section, large isotopic abundance, high gamma ray yield and a high (number) density. The table summarizes the principal gamma ray emissions and their yield, i.e. the % of decays resulting in the emission of gamma rays. The macroscopic cross section represents the cross section in the element (solid state, room temperature density) for a thickness of 1 cm. In order to obtain the relative gamma ray yield, one multiplies the macroscopic cross section by the gamma ray yield. Based on the cross section alone, Pr would be the preferred element. If one takes into account the gamma ray yield, then Cu is equally good if not better. The last rows of the table provide a comparison with the expected activation yield for a different kind of neutron reaction such as the 28Si(n,p)28Al reaction. Obviously, other reactions such as (n,)-reactions like 27Al(n,)24Na may be considered as well.
63Cu(n,2n)62Cu
65Cu(n,2n)64Cu
69Ga(n,2n)68Ga
75As(n,2n)74As
79Br(n,2n)78Br
85Rb(n,2n)84Rb
87Rb (n,2n)86Rb
121Sb (n,2n)120Sb
123Sb (n,2n)122Sb
127I(n,2n)126I
133Cs(n,2n)132Cs
138Ba (n,2n)137Ba
140Ce (n,2n)139mCe
141Pr (n,2n)140Pr
208Pb (n,2n)207Pb
28Si(n,p)28Al
56Fe(n,p)56Mn
141Pr looks like a very good candidate for this type of electronic gamma-ray source. The (n,2n) cross-section is the largest of all listed and the isotopic abundance of 141Pr is 100% and there are 1.02 511-keV gamma rays/decay (The +-decay results in the emission of two 511-keV gamma rays from annihilation, but only 51% of the decays of 140Pr are +-decays). In addition, the 140Pr radioisotope produced by the (n,2n) reaction has a very short half-life of 3.4 minutes. The short half-life means that the activated isotope will reach saturation or maximum gamma-ray emission in a few minutes after the start of the neutron generation and, when the 14 MeV neutron generator is turned off, the 140Pr will rapidly decay away in about 30 minutes. In 10 half-lives (34 minutes), the radioactivity will be reduced by a factor of 1/1024.
A closer look at Table 1 shows that the gamma ray emission probability is about the same for the activation of Cu as for Pr. In the case of 62Cu, almost 100% of the decay is + and therefore there are almost 2 gamma rays per decay. If one multiplies the macroscopic cross section with the gamma ray emission probability, one finds that Cu will emit more 511-keV gamma rays than Pr for the same thickness of material and the same activating neutron flux.
Pr has the advantage of a shorter half-life but it also has a several disadvantages. The material is more expensive and it is a poor conductor of heat. This may be a significant issue, since the bombardment of the target in the generator may lead to significant heat dissipation of 1 Os of watts. In order to avoid excessive target temperatures the heat may be evacuated. Another consideration is the fact that it may be desirable for gamma rays to exit the material without being scattered. This limits the thickness of the target material that can be used. For 511 keV gamma rays, the probability of scattering when traversing 1 cm of the material, is about 50% for both Cu and Pr, so in this respect Cu and Pr are equivalent.
The last two rows in Table 1 show the (n,p) reactions, which lead to activation of 28Si and 56Fe. The cross section is significantly smaller than for the activation of Cu or Pr through the (n,2n) reaction. However, the gamma ray energy is higher and, in the case of silicon, the density of the material is lower, so absorption is lower. The probability of scattering in 1 cm of material for the 1780-keV gamma rays from the decay of 28Al is 12%. This allows the use of thicker material and therefore for comparable gamma ray emission. In addition, the 28Si(n,p)28Al cross section is almost constant for neutron energies between 7 and 16 MeV, while the 63Cu(n,2n)62Cu cross section drops rapidly with decreasing neutron energy.
The generator tube 101 may be surrounded by material 115 that may be activated. Fast neutrons 107 traversing the material may interact with a nucleus 116 and may be converted to an activated isotope. Two neutrons 108 may be emitted in the case of an (n,2n) reaction with the target nucleus. The converted isotope may eventually decay by the direct or indirect (positron annihilation) emission of gamma rays. The number and energy of emitted gamma rays is a function of the activated isotopes and may be as high as 2 or more per decay, while in other cases only a fraction of a gamma ray may be emitted during the decay of an activated nucleus.
In some radiation generator tubes the target support 111 is made of copper in order to provide an electrical connection to the high voltage supply (not shown) and often more importantly to evacuate the heat generated by the particle beam impinging on the target. Therefore, the target may be shaped in such a way as to enhance the production and emission of activation gamma rays. Two embodiments are shown in
The device 450 in
In some cases, where it may be desirable to have gamma ray emission in a preferred direction, the target may not be surrounded symmetrically by activating material. Rather, the activating material may be placed preferably on the side from which gamma ray emission is desired. To enhance gamma ray emission further, the side away from the gamma emission may be equipped with a neutron reflecting material such as beryllium to direct some of the neutrons back towards the activator. This may be particularly useful if the activating material has a low activation energy threshold and reflected neutrons have a high probability of causing activation.
In yet another embodiment, the activation material may be partially or entirely surrounded by a reflector to return some of the neutrons that have traversed the activation material back to it. Beryllium or Aluminum may be particularly suited as they have low gamma ray scattering cross sections and the reflector has only a small impact on the intensity of the emitted gamma rays.
In yet another embodiment, better directionality of the gamma ray emission may be obtained by providing an opening or collimator in the activating material in the direction of interest. A possible layout is shown in
In order to determine the activating flux of neutrons, a neutron monitor may be used to estimate the activation in the absence of or in conjunction with a gamma-ray monitor. In addition, a neutron monitor may be used to obtain a better estimate of formation activation, due to the knowledge of the activating flux.
In order for the apparatus to work and to allow a clear distinction between gamma rays from activation and gamma rays from inelastic scattering of neutrons or neutron capture, special timing of the neutron pulses may be adopted to allow for sufficient time between neutron pulses for capture gamma rays to completely die away before the measurement starts. Diagram 700 in
The density measurement may take place during the time 793, following the die-away of inelastic and capture gamma rays 794 and 796. Additional measurements such as inelastic and capture gamma ray spectroscopy and the measurement of the macroscopic thermal neutron capture cross section may be made during the burst 792 and during the time interval 797 following the burst, during which capture gamma rays may be present. It should be understood that the burst 792 may be subdivided into a series of microbursts to allow additional measurements. As an example, the burst 792 could be divided in 1000 bursts of 20 s length separated by an 80-s pause. This would result in a 0.1-s long macroburst, which may be followed by a 2-ms decay time and a 0.2-s measurement time. Thus providing a duty cycle, i.e. fraction of available time, of about 67% for an activation-based measurement and 33% for other neutron measurements.
Many other pulse sequences are possible, as long as they allow for enough time for the activation based measurement. The pulse sequence or the time gates for the measurements may be adjusted based on the decay of the capture counts. In particular, in high salinity environments, the capture events decline in a time much shorter than 2 ms and the additional available time may be used for a density measurement or another activation based measurement. The limits for the time gates may be based on the die-away of the capture gamma rays and on the macroscopic thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation, commonly known as sigma, or the borehole derived from the die-away. In addition, the pulsing scheme may be adapted based on measurements such as sigma.
Additional detectors suited for other measurements may be added to the tool. Such detectors may be neutron detectors (fast neutron, thermal or epithermal as an example) or gamma ray detectors or a combination thereof for the determination of formation lithology, fluid determination, sigma, neutron porosity to name a few.
Since the neutrons may not only activate the material directly surrounding the target but also other materials in the tool, the surrounding borehole and the formation, there may be a need to correct for counts from such activation. Also, the tool layout can be optimized to reduce this effect through added shielding and selection of materials with low activation cross section for example. Also it may be advantageous for the detectors associated with the activation based measurement to be leading the neutron source with respect to the tool motion in order to minimize the impact of formation and borehole mud activation.
The main activation products in the borehole and the formation that may be seen by the detectors are 16N (activated oxygen) with a half-life of 7 s and 28Al from the activation of 28Si and 27Al (half-life 2.3 min). If the activation gamma ray source in the tool emits 511-keV gamma rays the correction for formation and borehole activation may be based on the detection of high energy gamma rays (Oxygen 6.13 MeV, Silicon 1780 keV). If Si were the activated element in the tool it may still be possible to apply a similar correction since the gamma rays scattered back to the detectors may have energies, which are much lower than those of gamma rays originating in the formation or borehole, which may have traveled to the detectors without scattering.
As indicated in
In order to determine the contribution to the gamma ray signal from activation of the borehole and the formation, one or more detectors not facing in the direction of the principal gamma ray emission may be used to obtain a more accurate estimate of the activation.
In addition, to the detectors 827 and 829 for the gamma-gamma density measurement, at least one additional detector 860 may be placed at the opposite side of the tool or at least at an azimuth, where it may not be affected by the gamma rays emitted by the activation source 815, since the shielding 812 and possible additional shielding (not shown) between the back detector 860 and the activation source may prevent gamma rays from the activation source 815 from reaching the detector 860, which may preferably be placed at the same axial distance from the source 815 as the short spaced detector 827. The detector 860 may be used to measure the activation induced in the formation so that, with proper scaling, it can be subtracted from the signal registered in the short spaced detector 827 and the long spaced detector 829. The results may be further enhanced by positioning additional detectors (not shown) preferably at the same azimuth as detector 860 at the same axial distance from the source 815 as the long spaced detector 829.
In order to enhance the precision, more than one detector 827 and 829 may be placed at closely spaced azimuths at the short spaced and the long spaced position. Shielding may be added between multiple detectors 827 or 829 azimuthally to minimize double counting gamma rays that may get detected in more than one of the adjacent detectors. Alternatively, electronic anticoincidence circuitry may be used to achieve the same goal.
A tool using an activation density measurement may be enhanced by complementing it with a full set of neutron measurements as outlined in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,073,378 and 7,334,465. This is outlined in
In yet another embodiment (not shown), the neutron measurements may be located in the stabilizer 1059 of
In yet another embodiment, in an LWD tool shown in
Alternatively, to the concept shown in
While the mud density measurement above has been described in terms of a measurement in a logging while drilling tool, a borehole mud density measurement could be made in other tools provided they have at least one opening that allows mud to enter in a cavity in the tool, allowing the passage of gamma rays. In a mandrel configuration tool, the activation target may be mounted in the mandrel and the one or more detectors may be mounted in the collar surrounding the mud channel and the mandrel. A gamma ray monitor may be mounted inside the mandrel next to the activation target or outside the mandrel in the collar, wherein the gap formed by the mud channel may be filled by a solid gamma ray transparent material such as polyether ether ketone (PEEK) between the activation target and the activation monitor over a limited axial length and azimuthal opening in order not to impede the mud flow. The transparent material may be part of the shock mounting of the mandrel in the LWD tool.
While the gamma ray generation has been described mainly in terms of an (n,2n)-reaction other suitable reactions such as 28Si(n,p)28Al can be used as well. Also, several activation materials can be mixed or placed strategically at different positions depending on the desired gamma ray spectrum or considerations regarding the energy dependence of the activation cross section. Materials, the activation cross section of which decreases less with decreasing neutron energy could favorably be put at a farther distance and the intervening room filled with a material with a larger cross section, which drops off more quickly as the neutron energy decreases.
While the examples indicate a wireline tool and an LWD tool, the invention can be used with any mode of conveyance of a downhole tool, such as wireline, drill pipe, slick line, through-drill-pipe to name a few.
The data processing may be done entirely by a processor in the downhole tool using a microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP) or a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or a combination thereof for an example. Some or all of the data may be transmitted to a computer or processor at the surface, which may further process the data. The data transmission to the surface may be done through mud telemetry, wired drill pipe, electromagnetic transmission, wireline or fiber optic to name a few. The data at the surface may further be transmitted to other processors such as computers at a computing center, a client office etc. by wired or wireless data transmission. Further data processing and analysis may be performed there on a single computer or multiple processors.
Data may be stored in the downhole tool, in particular if all the data cannot be transmitted to the surface in real time. The data may be stored in storage media such as flash memory, DRAM or SRAM. When the tool returns to surface the data may be transferred to a surface computer connected to one or more storage devices such as a magnetic hard drive, a solid state drive, DVD or CD etc. The storage device may be attached to the surface computer or may be remote.
The data stored in the tool may be read out at surface or downhole and transferred to a processor for processing and analysis. Surface read out may be through a wired connection or wireless. Downhole read out may be obtained by coupling the downhole tool memory to a readout tool present in the hole, where such coupling may be wireless, wired or acoustic for example.
Many modifications and other embodiments will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that various modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.