The field of the invention is downhole devices that separate cuttings from fluid that was previously pumped through the device to a mill or tool below and return the cuttings-laden fluid up an annular space to pass through the tool again for debris removal.
Milling downhole components generates debris that needs to be removed from circulating fluid. Fluid circulation systems featuring flow in different directions have been tried. One design involves reverse circulation where the clean fluid comes down a surrounding annulus to a mill and goes through rather large ports in the mill to take the developed cuttings into the mill to a cuttings separator such as the VACS tool sold by Baker Oil Tools. Tools like the VACS cannot be used above a mud motor that drives the mill and can only be used below a mud motor when using a rotary shoe. Apart from these limitations the mill design that requires large debris return passages that are centrally located forces the cutting structure to be mainly at the outer periphery and limits the application of such a system to specific applications.
The more common system involves pumping fluid through a mandrel in the cuttings catcher so that it can go down to the mill and return up the surrounding annular space to a discrete passage in the debris catcher. Usually there is an exterior diverter that directs the debris laden flow into the removal tool. These designs typically had valves of various types to keep the debris in the tool if circulation were stopped. These valves were problem areas because captured debris passing through would at times cling to the valve member either holding it open or closed. The designs incorporated a screen to remove fine cuttings but the screen was placed on the exterior of the tool putting it in harms way during handling at the surface or while running it into position downhole. These designs focused on making the mandrel the main structural member in the device which resulted in limiting the cross-sectional area and the volume available to catch and store debris. This feature made these devices more prone to fill before the milling was finished. In the prior designs, despite the existence of a screen in the flow stream through the tool, some fines would get through and collect in the surrounding annulus. The fixed debris barriers could get stuck when the tool was being removed. In some designs the solution was to removably mount the debris barrier to the tool housing or to let the debris barrier shift to open a bypass. In the prior designs that used cup seals looking uphole for example, if the screen in the tool plugged as the tool was removed the well could experience a vacuum or swabbing if a bypass around the cup seal were not to open.
Typical of the latter type of designs is U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,387. It accepts debris in FIG. 3 at 11 and all the debris has to clear the ball 12 that acts as a one way valve to retain debris if the circulation is stopped. Debris plugs this valve. The screen 6 is on the tool exterior and is subject to damage in handling at the surface or running it into the well. That screen filters fluid entering at 7 as the tool is removed. It has an emergency bypass 20 if the screen 6 clogs during removal operations. It relies on a large mandrel having a passage 3 which limits the volume available for capturing debris. By design, the cup 5 is always extended.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,188,675 again has a large mandrel passage 305 and takes debris laden fluid in at 301 at the bottom of FIG. 4. It uses internal pivoting valve members 203 shown closed in FIG. 5a and open in FIG. 5b. These valves can foul with debris. It has an exterior screen 303 than can be damaged during handling or running in. Its diverter 330 is fixed.
Finally U.S. Pat. No. 6,776,231 has externally exposed screen material 4 and a debris valve 20 shown in FIG. 3 that can clog with debris. It does show a retractable barrier 9 that requires a support for a part of the tool 7 in the wellbore and setting down weight. However, this barrier when in contact with casing has passages to try to pass debris laden flow and these passages can clog.
Well cleanup tools with barriers that function when movement is in one direction and separate when the tool is moved in the opposite direction are shown in Palmer US Application 2008/0029263. Other articulated barriers are illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,607,031 using set down weight and U.S. Pat. No. 7,322,408 using an inflatable and a pressure actuated shifting sleeve that uncovers a compressed ring to let it expand and become a diverter.
The present invention features one or more of an internal screen, an outer housing for structural support to allow a smaller mandrel and more volume for debris collection, top entry of the debris into the collection volume to eliminate valves that can clog with debris and articulated diverters or diverter to direct debris laden fluid into the tool at the bottom and/or at the top to keep debris from falling into an annular space around the exterior of the tool that may have gotten through the screen or was for some other reason in the wellbore. These and other features of the present invention will be more apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the various embodiments and the associated drawings with the understanding that the full scope of the invention is given by the claims.
A debris removal device features structural support from an exterior housing that allows more space for debris collection. The debris enters the collection volume from the top to eliminate debris from having to go through a valve. The screen in the device is disposed internally to protect it during handling and running. A variety of external flow diverters are used to direct debris laden fluid into the tool and to keep debris out of an annular space around the tool that could interfere with its removal. The diverters can be actuated by relative movement in the tool or applied pressure to a piston which can inflate a sleeve or orient or misalign paths through brushes for selective bypassing of fluid exterior to the tool.
A top sub 10 is connected to a string (not shown) that extends from the surface. A bottom sub 12 is connected to more string and perhaps a downhole motor to a mill at the bottom (all not shown) as the focus of the present invention is the debris removal tool T that is connected to the string and subs 10 and 12. A flow tube 14 is sealed at seal 16 to bottom sub 12 and is sealed at seals 18 to top sub 10. Passage 20 that extends through the flow tube 14 allows fluid from the surface to go through the tool T and down to the mill at the bottom to cool the mill and to remove cuttings and bring them back uphole to inlets 22.
Housing 24 is secured at opposed ends to top sub 10 and bottom sub 12. The hanging weight of the string (not shown) that is attached to bottom sub 12 is transferred through the housing 24 to top sub 10 and the balance of the string (not shown) that is located above top sub 10. Notice that there is no tension in the flow tube 14 from string weight by design. Instead, the flow tube 14 is simply a spacer sealed at opposed ends with seals 16 and 18. Since the flow tube 14 is not structural, it can be made fairly small and its size is determined by the surface pumping equipment, the needed circulation rates for the mill and the length of the string. However, using a small diameter flow tube leaves more room around it to use to catch debris without filling the debris retention volume, as will be later explained. This design feature is one of the aspects of the present invention.
The debris laden fluid enters annular passage 26 through inlets 24 and then flows through diverter tube(s) 28 as indicated by arrows 30 in
Referring back to
As seen in
One of the features to be noted at this point is the placement of the screen 54 inside of housing 24 so as to protect the screen 54 from impacts during surface handling or while tripping into and out of the well. The prior designs that used screens located them on the outside of the tool making the screen in those tools more prone to such damage.
In another aspect of the present invention, the external flow diverter or diverters that span the surrounding annulus 68 are articulated as opposed to the fixed deflectors used in the designs of the past. A fixed external flow deflector can cause formation damage either going into the well or coming out of the well. For example, a fixed cup seal looking downhole can build pressure on the formation when running in while if the cup seal is looking uphole it can reduce the formation pressure when the tool is pulled out of the hole to the point where the well actually comes in at the wrong time. While some past designs have incorporated bypasses for such diverters if flow through the tool is blocked when pulling the tool out, for example, there still remains a risk of adversely affecting the formation if such backup features do not fully perform. An articulated diverter as is proposed for the preferred embodiment eliminates this risk when moving in both directions as it can be placed in external bypass mode for running in and for coming out of the well and can also be energized for milling. The various embodiments of the diverter on the outside of the tool will now be described in conjunction with also describing an alternative embodiment for the internals of the tool.
Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that some of the benefits of the present invention of the
Referring to
While the present invention can be used in a string for milling it can also be used with other downhole tools that for example jet sand away from the top of a packer and remove it in tool T of the present invention.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1741497 | Boltz | Dec 1929 | A |
2675879 | Middleton et al. | Apr 1954 | A |
3198256 | Kirby, II | Aug 1965 | A |
5176208 | Lalande et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
6176311 | Ryan | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6250387 | Carmichael et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6607031 | Lynde et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6776231 | Allen | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6951251 | Penisson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7188675 | Reynolds | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7322408 | Howlett | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7562703 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20080029263 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090126933 | Telfer | May 2009 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
P. Connell, et al., Removal of Debris From Deepwater Wellbores Using Vectored Annulus Cleaning System Reduces Problems and Saves Rig Time; SPE 96440; Oct. 2005; 1-6. |
S.H. Fowler; A Reeled-Tubing Dowhnole Jet Cleaning System; SPE 21676; Apr. 1991; 411-416. |
Lance Portman, et al.; Bit and Mill Selection and Design for Coiled Tubing Applications; SPE 60754; Apr. 2000; 1-8. |
D.B. Haughton, et al.; Reliable and Effective Downhole Cleaning System for Debris and Junk Removal; SPE 101727; Sep. 2006; 1-9. |
D.B. Haughton, et al.; Method to Reduce Milling and Trip Times During the Recovery Operations of Permanent Production Packers; IADC/SPE 99138; Feb. 2006; 1-4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090283330 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |