Downhole optical radiometry tool

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9091151
  • Patent Number
    9,091,151
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 18, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 28, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
Various methods and tools optically analyze downhole fluid properties in situ. Some disclosed downhole optical radiometry tools include a tool body having a sample cell for fluid flow. A light beam passes through the sample cell and a spectral operation unit (SOU) such as a prism, filter, interferometer, or multivariate optical element (MOE). The resulting light provides a signal indicative of one or more properties of the fluid. A sensor configuration using electrically balanced thermopiles offers a high sensitivity over a wide temperature range. Further sensitivity is achieved by modulating the light beam and/or by providing a reference light beam that does not interact with the fluid flow. To provide a wide spectral range, some embodiments include multiple filaments in the light source, each filament having a different emission spectrum. Moreover, some embodiments include a second light source, sample cell, SOU, and detector to provide increased range, flexibility, and reliability.
Description
BACKGROUND

Spectroscopic analysis is popular method for determining compositions of fluids and other materials in a laboratory environment. However, implementing spectroscopic analysis in a downhole tool is a difficult task due to a number of obstacles, not the least of which is the great range of operating temperatures in which the tool must operate. If such obstacles were adequately addressed, a downhole optical radiometry tool could be used to analyze and monitor different properties of various fluids in situ.


For example, when formation fluid sampling tools draw fluid samples there is always a question of how much contamination (e.g., from drilling fluid in the borehole) exists in the sample stream and how much pumping must be done before the contamination level drops to an acceptable level. A downhole optical radiometry tool can measure various indicators of contamination, identify trends, and determine a completion time for the sampling process. Further, the downhole optical radiometry tool could be used to characterize the fluid composition to measure, e.g., water, light hydrocarbons, a distribution of hydrocarbon types (e.g., the so-called SARA measurement of saturated oils, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes), H2S concentrations, and CO2 concentrations. Moreover, PVT properties can be predicted, e.g., by measurements of Gas-Oil Ratios. The fluid compositions can be compared to those of fluids from other wells to measure reservoir connectivity. Such measurements can be the basis for formulating multi-billion dollar production strategies and recovery assessments, so accuracy and reliability are key concerns.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following detailed description should be considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 shows an illustrative logging while drilling (LWD) environment;



FIG. 2 shows an illustrative wireline environment;



FIG. 3 shows an illustrative downhole optical radiometry wireline tool;



FIGS. 4
a and 4b show a second illustrative downhole optical radiometry wireline tool embodiment;



FIG. 5
a shows a first illustrative LWD tool embodiment;



FIGS. 5
b and 5c show a second illustrative LWD tool embodiment;



FIG. 6 shows a first illustrative optical radiometry tool configuration;



FIG. 7 shows a second illustrative optical radiometry tool configuration;



FIG. 8 shows a third illustrative optical radiometry tool configuration;



FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of an illustrative downhole optical radiometry tool; and



FIG. 10 is a flowchart of an illustrative downhole optical analysis method.





It is noted that the drawings and detailed description are directed to specific illustrative embodiments of the invention. It should be understood, however, that the illustrated and described embodiments are not intended to limit the disclosure, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Accordingly, disclosed herein are various embodiments for a method and tool to optically analyze downhole fluid properties in situ. In at least some embodiments, a disclosed downhole optical radiometry tool includes a tool body having a downhole sample cell for fluid flow. A light source transmits a light beam through the fluid flow and a spectral operation unit (SOU) such as a prism, filter, interferometer, or multivariate optical element (MOE). The resulting light strikes at least one of multiple electrically balanced thermopiles, producing a signal indicative of one or more properties of the fluid. The balanced thermopiles enable a high degree of sensitivity over a wide temperature range. Further sensitivity can be provided by maintaining the thermopile substrates at a constant temperature, modulating the light downstream of the sample cell, and/or by providing a reference light beam that does not interact with the fluid flow. To provide a wide spectral range, some tool embodiments include multiple filaments in the light source, each filament having a different emission spectrum. The light from such wideband light sources can be better collimated using mirrors and apertures instead of lenses. Moreover, some tool embodiments include a second light source, sample cell, SOU, and detector to provide increased range, flexibility, and reliability. The tool can be a wireline tool, a tubing-conveyed tool, or a logging while drilling (LWD) tool.


In at least some embodiments, a disclosed downhole fluid analysis method includes: passing a sample of fluid through a downhole sample cell where a light beam interacts with said sample fluid; and receiving the light beam with a light detector after the light beam passes through a spectral operation unit (SOU). The light detector can include two electrically balanced thermopiles with at least one thermopile shielded from the light beam. Some method and tool embodiments employ a wheel having multiple SOUs that can be sequentially moved into the light path to provide measurements of different fluid properties. In some configurations, the wheel can in some cases surround a central flow passage through the tool.


These and other aspects of the disclosed tools and methods are best understood in the context of the larger systems in which they operate. Accordingly, an illustrative logging while drilling (LWD) environment is shown in FIG. 1. A drilling platform 102 is equipped with a derrick 104 that supports a hoist 106 for raising and lowering a drill string 108. The hoist 106 suspends a top drive 110 that is used to rotate the drill string 108 and to lower the drill string through the well head 112. Sections of the drill string 108 are connected by threaded connectors 107. Connected to the lower end of the drill string 108 is a drill bit 114. As bit 114 rotates, it creates a borehole 120 that passes through various formations 121. A pump 116 circulates drilling fluid through a supply pipe 118 to top drive 110, downhole through the interior of drill string 108, through orifices in drill bit 114, back to the surface via the annulus around drill string 108, and into a retention pit 124. The drilling fluid transports cuttings from the borehole into the pit 124 and aids in maintaining the integrity of the borehole 120.


Some wells can employ acoustic telemetry for LWD. Downhole sensors (including downhole optical radiometry tool 126) are coupled to a telemetry module 128 including an acoustic telemetry transmitter that transmits telemetry signals in the form of acoustic vibrations in the tubing wall of drill string 108. An acoustic telemetry receiver array 130 may be coupled to tubing below the top drive 110 to receive transmitted telemetry signals. One or more repeater modules 132 may be optionally provided along the drill string to receive and retransmit the telemetry signals. Other telemetry techniques that can be employed include mud pulse telemetry, electromagnetic telemetry, and wired drill pipe telemetry.


At various times during the drilling process, the drill string 108 is removed from the borehole as shown in FIG. 2. Once the drill string has been removed, logging operations can be conducted using a wireline logging tool 134, i.e., a sensing instrument sonde suspended by a cable 142 having conductors for transporting power to the tool and telemetry from the tool to the surface. An optical radiometry portion of the logging tool 134 may have extendable arms 136 that provide sealing contact with the borehole wall and enable the tool to withdraw samples of fluid from the formation and selectable positions along the borehole. A logging facility 144 collects measurements from the logging tool 134, and includes computing facilities for processing and storing the measurements gathered by the logging tool.



FIG. 3 shows an illustrative wireline tool 302 for formation fluid sampling and analysis using a downhole optical radiometry tool. Tool 302 includes rams 304 and 306 that move laterally to press the tool towards the opposite borehole wall, thereby enabling probes 308A and 308B to make contact with that wall. The probes each have an opening 309A, 309B surrounded by a respective cup-shaped sealing pad 310A, 310B. A piston pump 312 draws fluid into flow line 314 from the formation via either of the probes. Flow line 314 includes various valves 316 that work cooperatively with pump 312 to direct the fluid from flow line 314 to a desired branch. In this manner, pump 312 can exhaust the fluid from tool 302 or direct the fluid along flow line 314 to downhole optical radiometry tool 318. A second downhole optical radiometry tool 320 is shown in series with tool 318, but in alternative embodiments it is selectably coupled in a parallel arrangement. The flow line 314 continues to a multi-chamber sample collection module 322 that enables the tool 302 to collect multiple samples for retrieval to the surface. Further branches in flow line 314 can connect to other modules and/or secondary exhaust ports.


As explained in greater detail below, the optical radiometry tools 318, 320 in tool 302 enable downhole measurement of various fluid properties including contamination level, gas concentration, and composition. Such measurements can be employed in deciding whether and when to take or keep a fluid sample for transport to the surface, and can even assist in determining repositioning of the tool for additional sampling operations. The inclusion of two tools offers an increased range of flexibility in the measurements that can be performed by the tool and/or increased reliability or resolution through the use of redundant components. Moreover, the use of two tools at different points on the flow line enables monitoring of fluid flow dynamics including flow velocities of different fluid phases.



FIGS. 4A and 4B show an alternative wireline tool embodiment in partially disassembled and cutaway views that offer greater detail. Tool 402 includes an extensible probe 404 with a sealing face surrounding an aperture that connects to a flow line 406. Flow line 406 conducts fluid to two downhole optical radiometry tools 408, 410. Each radiometry tool includes a corresponding piston pump 412 that can draw fluid from flow line 406 into a sample cell and then direct it to a subsequent module or to an exhaust port 414.



FIG. 4B shows a cross-sectional side view of optical radiometry tool 410. This view demonstrates the connection of flow path 406 to a sample cell 417 having a flow passage 418 between two windows 419 and onward to pump 412. A light source 416 shines light on a parabolic collimating mirror that directs the light along a primary light path 430. The primary light path passes through fluid in the sample cell 417 via windows 419 before being directed by mirrors 432, 434 to a detector 422. Just before striking the detector, the light path passes through one of multiple spectral operation units 421 in a circular wheel 420. Some tool embodiments include a light collector to concentrate light from the spectral operation unit onto the detector. While a lens could serve this function, a parabolic reflector may be preferred.


A secondary light path 440 is formed by a light guide 422 that intercepts a non-collimated portion of the light from light source 416 and directs it to a beam splitter 436, which in this case operates to combine the primary and secondary light paths on the last segment through the circular wheel 420 to the detector 422. Suitable materials for the beam splitter include zinc sulfide and zinc selenide. Shutters 434 and 444 can selectively gate light from the primary and secondary light paths. Since light from both paths can be alternately directed onto the detector, the tool can compensate for aging, temperature, and other effects on the various system components including variation of the light source intensity and spectrum.


In an alternative embodiment, a movable mirror place of the beam splitter 436 can eliminate the need for shutters 434 and 444. In addition to selecting one of the light paths, the shutters or movable mirror can be used to modulate the light signal before it strikes the detector, an operation which may offer increased measurement sensitivity. Alternatively, modulation could be provided using a chopper wheel (a rotating disk having spokes to alternately block and pass light traveling along the optical axis).


A motor 450 turns the wheel 420 via a gearing arrangement that includes a position resolver 452. The resolver 452 enables the tool electronics to track the position of the wheel 420 and thereby determine which (if any) SOU is on the optical axis. In some embodiments, the wheel 420 includes an open aperture 415 (see FIG. 4A) to enable calibration of the light detector 422.


In at least some embodiments, the light source 416 takes the form of an electrically heated tungsten filament (e.g., in a tungsten halogen bulb) that produces a broad spectrum of electromagnetic emissions including visible and infrared wavelengths. The emission spectrum mimics a blackbody radiation curve. The filament is trapped in a small insulated volume to improve the heating efficiency. The volume is windowed by a transparent material (such as quartz, sapphire, ZnS) to help trap heat, while enabling light to escape. The filament may also be altered in composition to improve performance. Other materials may include tungsten alloys or carbon with carbon nanostructures being the most probable candidates. Potentially, the light source's bulb may include photonic crystals or blackbody radiators to convert some of the visible radiation into IR radiation, thereby enhancing the source's intensity in the IR band.


A series of reflectors collimates light from the light source and directs it along the primary light path (sometimes referred to herein as the optical axis). The reflectors can be designed to provide relatively uniform intensity across a region of investigation in the sample cell, or in some cases they can be designed to concentrate the light to a line or sharp point focus to promote an interaction with the fluid. For example, a line focus can be provided using an elongated parabolic trough. The light incident on the SOUs can similarly be given a relatively uniform intensity distribution or brought to a line or sharp point focus. Strong collimation is not crucial to the tool's operation. Some contemplated tool embodiments provide only a moderate degree of collimation (with a divergence half angle of up to 30°) and use a short waveguide as an integrating rod to contain and homogenize the emitted light.


A portion of the emitted light can be diverted and routed along a separate optical path to the detector to act as a reference beam. In addition or as an alternative to reflectors, optical light pipes (e.g., waveguides or optical fibers) can be used to guide the primary and/or secondary light beams along portions of their routes. Such an optical light pipe 442 is shown in FIG. 4B. Where feasible, air is evacuated from the light paths, though in some contemplated embodiments the tool cavity is pressurized with argon or nitrogen. Among the contemplated optical fiber types are fluoride fiber, sapphire fiber, chalcogenide fiber, silver halide fiber, low OH fibers, photonic crystal fibers (a.k.a. “holey fibers”), and hollow wave guide fiber. Solid rods of calcium fluoride and sapphire, with and without metalized surfaces (e.g., a gold coating), are also contemplated, and they may provide an additional benefit of increased light beam homogenization. Specifically contemplated fibers include MIR FluoroZirconate Fibers, IR chalcogenide fibers, IR Silver halide fibers, and IR Sapphire fibers from Sedi Fibres Optique of Courcouronnes, France; IR fibers from Le Verre Fluore of Brittany, France; Hollow Silica Waveguide (HSW) from Polymicro Technologies of Phoenix, Ariz.; IRphotonics materials (including UVIR™ fluoride glass) from iGuide of Hamden Conn.; and sapphire fibers from Photran of Poway, Calif. Of course other suitable materials and methods for directing light along desired paths through the tool exist and can be used.


In FIG. 4B, sample cell 417 takes the form of a windowed flow passage. The collimated light impinges a sample cell formed by a set of windows within a pressure housing to contain a fluid flow. Suitable materials for the windows include sapphire material, ZnS material, diamond material, zirconium material or carbide material. Sapphire material in particular offers desirable innate optical properties (such as low reflection loss), strength, and chemical inertness. Other materials listed present other attractive optical properties as well. A combination of materials may be used to maximize desired performance characteristics. Some tool embodiments provide the window surfaces in contact with the sample fluid with a coating of material such as Sulfinert™ to reduce chemical activity of the fluid while maintaining desired optical properties. The windows can be coated for anti-reflection properties. Some contemplated tool embodiments shape the receiving face of the window nearest the light source as a lens to improve optical characteristics of the spot. The faces of the sample cell windows abutting the fluid flow may be planar to maximize flow uniformity. Similarly the departure face of the window furthest from the light source can be shaped to improve the collimation of the light beam.


In at least some embodiments, the desired spot size (measured perpendicular to the optical axis in the center of the sample cell) is greater than ⅜ inch and less than ½ inch. The desired collimation is less than 7.5 RMS angular distribution within the spot with less than 3 RMS being more desirable. A homogenization of better than 10% RSD is most desirable within the spot with better than 5% being more desirable. An efficiency of better than 50% collimated power within the spot size (total emission—filament absorption) is desirable with better than 60% being more desirable and greater than 70% being most desirable.


The optical windows in sample cell 417 are sealed into an Inconel pressure vessel with brazing of sapphire to Inconell envisioned as the current method. Alternative methods include gasket seals on a front window etched for positive pressure, or compressive o-ring seals which may include compressive spacers and/or gaskets. The envisioned transmission gap is seen as 1 mm with 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm being the contemplated range of possibly suitable gaps. In some embodiments, the inner window surfaces provide a variable gap distance to enable detection of fluids of wide optical densities. The optical densities are expected to vary from 0.1 to 10 optical density normally with up to 60 optical density units at times. The variable path length may be achieved by varying the shape of the second receiving window surface in contact with the fluid.


The spectral operation units (SOUs) 421 are shown interacting with the light after it has passed through the sample cell. (This configuration is not required, as it would be possible to have the light pass through the SOU before entering the sample cell.) As the light interacts with the fluid, the light spectrum becomes imprinted with the optical characteristics of the fluid. The interaction of the light with the fluid is a transformation of the optical properties of the light. The SOU provides further processing of the light spectrum to enable one or more light intensity sensors to collect measurements from which properties of the fluid can be ascertained.


The tool embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4 are wireline tool embodiments. FIG. 5A shows an illustrative logging while drilling tool embodiment 502 having a flow passage 504 for drilling fluid. Also shown is a cavity for a downhole optical radiometry tool 506, which can be used for analyzing formation fluid samples, borehole fluids, and/or fluids passing through the flow passage 504. In tool 502, the flow passage 504 deviates from the central axis of the tool body. Such deviation enables downhole radiometry tool to employ a larger circular wheel 508 of SOUs. The wheel 508 has an axis oriented perpendicular to the axis of the tool body, and the allowable diameter for the wheel is maximized when the wheel is near the axis of the cylindrical tool body.


However, it may in some cases be undesirable to have the flow passage deviate from the central axis of the tool body. Accordingly, FIG. 5b illustrates an alternative logging while drilling tool embodiment 510 having a flow passage 512 along the central axis. A downhole optical radiometry tool in this situation could employ a circular wheel 514 of SOUs that surrounds the central flow passage. As illustrated in FIG. 5C, the wheel assumes the form of an annular ring. A drive gear 516 can rotate the annular ring from the inner or outer rim. In either case, the number of SOUs that can be fit into the wheel is increased to enable a greater range of fluid property measurements.



FIGS. 6-8 show illustrative configurations for downhole optical radiometry tools that can be employed in the wireline and LWD tools described above. FIG. 6 shows a configuration in which a wheel of SOUs is employed to provide multiple optical measurements. A light source 614 transmits light along a light path 602 that passes through a sample cell 606 having a fluid flowing between two windows 607A, 607B. The light passes through window 607A, interacts with the fluid, and passes through window 607B before impinging on an SOU 611 passing across the optical axis. The light from the SOU then strikes optical sensor 610, which is coupled to an analog-to-digital converter that enables a processor to capture measurement values. As the SOU wheel 612 rotates, the processor is able to determine which SOU is on the optical axis and to interpret the measurement values accordingly. In some embodiments the optical sensor measures light that is transmitted through the SOU, while in other embodiments the optical sensor measures light that is reflected from the SOU. In still other embodiments, one or more optical sensors are used to measure both transmitted and reflected light.


The wheel can include SOUs in the form of optical filters that selectively pass or block certain wavelengths of light, thereby enabling the processor to collect measurements of spectral intensity at specific wavelengths. Alternatively or in addition, the wheel can include SOUs in the form of multivariate optical elements (MOEs). MOEs offer a way to process the entire spectrum of the incident light to measure how well it matches to a given spectral template. In this manner, different MOEs can provide measurements of different fluid properties. In some system embodiments, the MOEs measure spectral character across the range from 350 nm to 6000 nm. Some contemplated downhole optical radiometry tools include MOEs that operate on light across the spectral range from 200 nm to 14,000 nm. To cover this range, some tool embodiments employ multiple light sources or a light source with multiple filaments or otherwise enhanced emission ranges.


Multiple MOEs are included in some downhole optical radiometry tools to provide a range of measurements such as, e.g., concentrations of water, H2S, CO2, light hydrocarbons (Methane, Ethane, Propane, Butanes, Pentanes, Hexanes and Heptanes), diesel, saturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, resins, asphaltenes, olefins, and/or esters. Collective measurements of gases and oils can also be obtained by MOEs and processed by the processor to measure Gas-Oil Ratio or other properties such as equation of state, bubble point, precipitation point or other Pressure-Volume-Temperature properties, viscosity, contamination, and other fluid properties. Moreover, by monitoring the manner in which measurements change over time, the processor can detect and identify different fluid phases and the various rates at which those phases pass through the analysis region.


In at least some tool embodiments, the wheel includes multiple rows of angularly-aligned filters at corresponding radii. For example, one embodiment includes two rows, with the inner and outer SOUs at each given angular position being matched to provide detector normalization (e.g., the sole difference might be the coating on the outer SOU). In another two-row embodiment, the inner and outer SOUs are complementary filters or MOEs. The light from both paths alternately strikes the same detector, thereby enabling cancellation of temperature, aging, and other environmental effects. (Note that the complementary SOUs could have fully complementary spectra or just different pass bands. Either case allows for differential measurements that provide cancellation of common mode noise.)


The light sensor 610 receives the light that has been influenced by both the sample cell 606 and the SOU 611. Various forms of light sensors are contemplated including quantum-effect photodetectors (such as photodiodes, photoresistors, phototransistors, photovoltaic cells, and photomultiplier tubes) and thermal-effect photodectors (such as pyroelectric detectors, Golay cells, thermocouples, thermopiles, and thermistors). Most quantum-effect photodetectors are semiconductor based, e.g., silicon, InGaAs, PbS, and PbSe. In tools operating in only the visible and/or near infrared, both quantum-effect photodetectors and thermal-effect photodetectors are suitable. In tools operating across wider spectral ranges, thermal-effect photodetectors are preferred. One contemplated tool embodiment employs a combined detector made up of a silicon photodiode stacked above an InGaAs photodiode.


Some contemplated downhole optical radiometry tool embodiments employ two electrically balanced thermopiles as a photodetector. One thermopile is exposed to light traveling along the optical axis, while the other thermopile is shielded from such light and is used as a baseline reference when detecting the first thermopile's response to the light. Such a configuration offers an effective cancellation of environmental factors such as temperature, thereby providing enhanced sensitivity over a wide range of environmental conditions. Sensitivity can be further enhanced by heating the photodetector substrates and maintaining them at a constant temperature near or above the expected environmental temperature, or at least to a temperature where the effects of any further temperature increases are negligible. One contemplated environmental temperature range is from 40° to 400° F., with the detector temperature being maintained above 200° F.


The sensitivity may be further enhanced with the use of a secondary correction circuit, possibly in the form of an adaptive compensation circuit that adjusts a transducer bias current or voltage prior to signal amplification. The adjustments would be performed using standard adaptation techniques for compensating systematic sensing errors.


A shutter or chopper wheel can be used to modulation the light beam before it strikes the photodetector. Such modulation provides a way to measure the photodector signal in alternating light and dark states, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of the tool electronics to that portion of the signal attributable to the incident light. If the electrical signal is proportional to the light intensity, it provides a direct measure of the fluid property that the filter or MOE is designed to provide (assuming that the processor is calibrated to properly compensate for light source variations). The processor samples, processes, and combines the electronic output of the light sensor 610 to obtain the fluid properties of interest. As previously mentioned, these properties can include not only formation fluid composition, but also levels of contamination from drilling fluid (measurable by detecting such components as esters, olefins, diesel, and water), time-based trends in contamination, and reservoir compartmentalization or connectivity information based on composition or photometric signature.


As illustrated in FIG. 7, downhole optical radiometry tools are not limited to SOU wheel configurations, but can alternatively employ a spectral dispersion element 702 such as a prism, diffraction grating, or holographic element. The dispersed spectral components can be measured by a light sensing array 704 of multiple light sensors or, in some cases, a single light sensor that sweeps across the various spectral components. As before, light sensor(s) can take multiple forms, with an integrated array of sensors being preferred for optimized performance. A charge-coupled device (CCD) array is one example of an integrated sensor array which could be used in this configuration.



FIG. 8 shows yet another downhole optical radiometry tool configuration which is similar to the embodiments of FIGS. 6-7, except that it employs a Michelson-type interferometer 802 to transform the light beam into an interferogram, i.e., a signal in which the various spectral components exhibit a time domain oscillation at a rate defined by their wavelength and the speed with which the interferometer's path length changes. The interferometer includes a beam splitter 804 that divides the incident light into two beams. One beam reflects off a fixed mirror 806 and the other off a mirror that moves at a velocity ν. The light beams then recombine at the beam splitter to form the interferogram which is then directed to the light sensor 610. As the path length difference rate of change is 2ν, the spectral component of the light beam having wavelength λ oscillates at a frequency of f=2ν/λ. (Note that the velocity ν varies as the mirror moves back and forth, so such variation should be taken into account.) If a Fourier transform is applied to the time domain signal provided by the light sensor, the result is the optical spectrum of the light from the sample cell. A processor can then analyze the spectral characteristics digitally to identify the various fluid properties discussed previously.



FIG. 9 illustrates an enhanced measurement configuration for a downhole optical radiometry tool. A light source 902 emits light that is collimated by a parabolic reflector 904 and directed along a light path to a beam splitter 906. The beam splitter directs a portion of the light to a light sensor 908 having an electrically balanced thermopile configuration. A processor 910 digitizes and processes the signal from sensor 908 to monitor fluctuations in the brightness of the light source.


Beam splitter 906 passes the main portion of the light beam to an optical guide 912 such as, e.g., a calcium fluoride rod. The optical guide 912 communicates the light to sample cell 914, where the light passes through fluid between two transparent windows. Light exiting the sample cell passes along a second optical guide 916 to a second beam splitter 918 that directs a portion of the light to a second light sensor 920. Processor 910 digitizes and processes the signal from sensor 920 to monitor optical density of the fluid and calibrate the brightness of the light incident on the SOU.


Beam splitter 918 passes the bulk of the light beam to wheel 922 where it interacts with a SOU such as a filter or MOE before passing through a shutter to reach light sensor 926. The shutter 924 modulates the light beam to increase the sensitivity of light sensor 926. Processor 920 digitizes and processes the signal from sensor 926 in combination with the measurements of sensors 920 and 908 to determine one or more fluid property measurements. As the wheel 922 turns, other SOUs are brought into the light path to increase the number of measurement types that are collected and processed by processor 910. Each of the sensors can employ the electrically balanced thermopiles to improve the tool's performance across a wide temperature range.



FIG. 10 shows an illustrative downhole fluid analysis method to determine various fluid properties. In block 1002, a downhole optical radiometry tool pumps fluid through a downhole sample cell. In block 1004, the tool energizes a downhole light source such as an electrical filament. In block 1006, the tool takes a measurement of the light source intensity and either adjusts the bulb temperature, determines a compensation value for the measurement, or both. In block 1008, the light emitted from the light source is provided with collimation and directed along an optical path through the tool. In block 1010, the tool transmits light through two windows in the sample cell and the fluid that is present in the gap between the two windows. The light exiting the sample cell is directed to at least one spectral operation unit such as, e.g., a filter or multivariate optical element. In block 1012, the tool senses light from the SOU with a light sensor. The light intensity signal from the sensor is conditioned, sampled, and digitized by the processor. In block 1014, the tool processes the measurements to ascertain one or more properties of the fluid in the sample cell. The processor can record the measurements in internal memory and/or transmit the data to the surface via wireline or LWD telemetry.


Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.

Claims
  • 1. A downhole optical radiometry tool that comprises: a tool body that includes a downhole sample cell for fluid flow;a light source inside said tool body;a spectral operation unit (SOU); anda light detector, which includes at least two electrically balanced thermopiles, where at least one thermopile is arranged to receive a light beam emitted from said light source after said light beam has encountered said sample cell and said SOU, wherein at least one thermopile is shielded from the light beam, and wherein said light detector combines outputs from the electrically balanced thermopiles to provide an electric signal proportional to a property of said fluid.
  • 2. The tool of claim 1, wherein said light source has two or more filaments with different emission spectra.
  • 3. The tool of claim 1, wherein said SOU comprises multiple MOEs to measure different fluid properties.
  • 4. The tool of claim 1, wherein SOU comprises a filter array or spectral dispersion device.
  • 5. The tool of claim 1, further comprising a shutter to gate said light beam between said sample cell and said light detector.
  • 6. The tool of claim 1, further comprising a parabolic mirror that collimates light from said light source into said light beam.
  • 7. The tool of claim 1, wherein the tool body is suspended by a wireline in a borehole.
  • 8. The tool of claim 1, wherein the tool body is incorporated into a drill string.
  • 9. The tool of claim 1, further comprising a second sample cell that receives said fluid flow in series with said downhole sample cell to measure at least one dynamic property of said fluid flow.
  • 10. A downhole fluid analysis method that comprises: passing a sample of fluid through a downhole sample cell where a light beam interacts with said sample fluid; andreceiving said light beam with a light detector after the light beam passes through a spectral operation unit (SOU), wherein the light detector includes at least two electrically balanced thermopiles with at least one thermopile shielded from the light beam; andcombining outputs from the electrically balanced thermopiles to provide an electric signal proportional to a property of said sample fluid.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, further comprising: generating said light beam using a light source having two or more filaments with different emission spectra.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, further comprising: modulating said light beam after it has left the sample cell.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, further comprising: collimating light from said light source into said light beam using a parabolic mirror.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, further comprising: determining hydrocarbon types and a measure of contamination based on the intensity of said light beam.
  • 15. A downhole optical radiometry tool that comprises: a tool body that includes a downhole sample cell for fluid flow;a light source inside said tool body;a multivariate optical element (MOE); anda light detector, arranged to receive a light beam emitted from said light source after said light beam passes through said sample cell and said MOE device, wherein said MOE is mounted in a circular wheel with other MOEs that measure other fluid properties, and wherein the circular wheel has a central flow passage.
  • 16. The tool of claim 15, wherein said MOE provides a measure of hydrocarbon type.
  • 17. The tool of claim 15, wherein said MOE provides a measure of contamination.
  • 18. The tool of claim 15, wherein said wheel includes an open aperture for use as a reference.
  • 19. The tool of claim 15, wherein said tool body includes a shutter to modulate said light beam between said sample cell and said light detector.
  • 20. The tool of claim 15, wherein said light detector includes at least two electrically balanced thermopiles, at least one of which is arranged to receive said light beam emitted from said light source after said light beam is influenced by said sample cell and said MOE device.
  • 21. A downhole fluid analysis method that comprises: passing a sample of fluid through a downhole sample cell where a light beam interacts with said sample fluid;detecting an intensity of said light beam after it has passed through said sample cell and a downhole multivariate optical element (MOE); andturning a circular wheel having an array of MOEs including said downhole MOE, wherein the circular wheel has a central flow passage.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, further comprising forming said light beam by collimating light from a downhole light source using a parabolic mirror.
  • 23. The method of claim 21, wherein the downhole MOE provides a measure of a fluid property in the group consisting of: contamination, H2S concentration, CO2 concentration, hydrocarbon type, and water concentration.
  • 24. A downhole optical radiometry tool that comprises: a tool body that includes a downhole sample cell for fluid flow;a light source inside said tool body;a multivariate optical element (MOE) mounted in a circular wheel with other MOEs, wherein the circular wheel has a central flow passage; anda light detector inside said tool body, wherein the light detector senses light from said light source that has interacted with said fluid flow and at least one of said MOEs.
  • 25. The tool of claim 24, wherein said light detector includes at least two electrically balanced thermopiles, at least one of which is arranged to receive said light from said light source.
  • 26. The tool of claim 24, wherein said MOEs provide measurements of different fluid properties, and wherein said wheel includes an open aperture for use as a reference.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/262,895, filed Nov. 19, 2009, by Inventors Christopher M. Jones, Stephen A. Zannoni, Michael T. Pelletier, Raj Pai, Wei Zhang, Marian L. Morys, and Robert Atkinson. The foregoing application is hereby incorporated by reference.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2010/057172 11/18/2010 WO 00 4/19/2012
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2011/063086 5/26/2011 WO A
US Referenced Citations (197)
Number Name Date Kind
223898 Edison Jan 1880 A
2757300 Laidig Jul 1956 A
2972251 Harper Feb 1961 A
3371574 Dwyer Mar 1968 A
3449546 Dhoble Jun 1969 A
3734629 Griffiths et al. May 1973 A
4103174 McClatchie et al. Jul 1978 A
4160929 Thorington et al. Jul 1979 A
4370886 Smith, Jr. et al. Feb 1983 A
4375164 Dodge et al. Mar 1983 A
4499955 Campbell et al. Feb 1985 A
4606636 Monin et al. Aug 1986 A
4635735 Crownover Jan 1987 A
4696903 Owen Sep 1987 A
4722612 Junkert et al. Feb 1988 A
4774396 Salit et al. Sep 1988 A
4791310 Honig et al. Dec 1988 A
4800279 Hieftje et al. Jan 1989 A
4802761 Bowen et al. Feb 1989 A
4839516 Freeman et al. Jun 1989 A
4994671 Safinya et al. Feb 1991 A
4996421 Rai et al. Feb 1991 A
5126570 Boos Jun 1992 A
5161409 Hughes et al. Nov 1992 A
5166747 Schroeder et al. Nov 1992 A
RE34153 Benner et al. Dec 1992 E
5167149 Mullins et al. Dec 1992 A
5201220 Mullins et al. Apr 1993 A
5258620 Sueyasu et al. Nov 1993 A
5284054 Loebach Feb 1994 A
5304492 Klinkhammer Apr 1994 A
5306909 Jones et al. Apr 1994 A
5331156 Hines et al. Jul 1994 A
5331399 Tank et al. Jul 1994 A
5341207 Tank et al. Aug 1994 A
5360738 Jones et al. Nov 1994 A
5368669 Maine et al. Nov 1994 A
5457259 Elgarhy et al. Oct 1995 A
5517024 Mullins et al. May 1996 A
5557103 Hughes et al. Sep 1996 A
5621523 Oobayashi et al. Apr 1997 A
5729013 Bergren, III Mar 1998 A
5790432 Morys Aug 1998 A
5859430 Mullins et al. Jan 1999 A
5912459 Mullins et al. Jun 1999 A
5939717 Mullins Aug 1999 A
5946641 Morys Aug 1999 A
6006844 Van Puymbroeck et al. Dec 1999 A
6023340 Wu et al. Feb 2000 A
6040191 Grow Mar 2000 A
6075611 Dussan et al. Jun 2000 A
6140637 Mullins et al. Oct 2000 A
6162766 Muir et al. Dec 2000 A
6176323 Weirich et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178815 Felling et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181427 Yarussi et al. Jan 2001 B1
6218662 Tchakarov et al. Apr 2001 B1
6220371 Sharma et al. Apr 2001 B1
6268726 Prammer et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268911 Tubel et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274865 Schroer et al. Aug 2001 B1
6350986 Mullins et al. Feb 2002 B1
6355928 Skinner et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362619 Prammer et al. Mar 2002 B2
6388251 Papanyan May 2002 B1
6401529 Robison et al. Jun 2002 B1
6403949 Davis et al. Jun 2002 B1
6437326 Yamate et al. Aug 2002 B1
6465775 Mullins et al. Oct 2002 B2
6474152 Mullins et al. Nov 2002 B1
6476384 Mullins et al. Nov 2002 B1
6501072 Mullins et al. Dec 2002 B2
6507401 Turner et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518756 Morys et al. Feb 2003 B1
6583621 Prammer et al. Jun 2003 B2
6627873 Tchakarov et al. Sep 2003 B2
6678050 Pope et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683681 DiFoggio et al. Jan 2004 B2
6704109 Wu et al. Mar 2004 B2
6707556 Turner et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714872 DiFoggio et al. Mar 2004 B2
6729400 Mullins et al. May 2004 B2
6765384 Morys Jul 2004 B2
6768105 Mullins et al. Jul 2004 B2
6788066 Wisler et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794652 Walkow Sep 2004 B2
6798518 DiFoggio et al. Sep 2004 B2
6825659 Prammer et al. Nov 2004 B2
6853452 Laufer Feb 2005 B1
6888127 Jones et al. May 2005 B2
6927846 Smith et al. Aug 2005 B2
6956204 Dong et al. Oct 2005 B2
6967322 Jones et al. Nov 2005 B2
6967722 Manning Nov 2005 B2
6975112 Morys et al. Dec 2005 B2
6988547 Goodwin et al. Jan 2006 B2
6992768 Dong et al. Jan 2006 B2
6995360 Jones et al. Feb 2006 B2
6997055 DiFoggio Feb 2006 B2
7002142 Mullins et al. Feb 2006 B2
7016026 DiFoggio et al. Mar 2006 B2
7061168 Schmidt Jun 2006 B2
7081615 Betancourt et al. Jul 2006 B2
7084392 DiFoggio et al. Aug 2006 B2
7095012 Fujisawa et al. Aug 2006 B2
7105849 Prelewitz Sep 2006 B2
7142306 Wu et al. Nov 2006 B2
7173239 DiFoggio Feb 2007 B2
7195731 Jones Mar 2007 B2
7196786 DiFoggio Mar 2007 B2
7210343 Shammai et al. May 2007 B2
7214933 DiFoggio et al. May 2007 B2
7243536 Bolze et al. Jul 2007 B2
7245382 Ronnekleiv Jul 2007 B2
7248370 Jones Jul 2007 B2
7251037 Jones Jul 2007 B2
7279678 Andrews et al. Oct 2007 B2
7280214 DiFoggio et al. Oct 2007 B2
7293613 Goldberg et al. Nov 2007 B2
7299136 DiFoggio et al. Nov 2007 B2
7305306 Venkataramanan et al. Dec 2007 B2
7315377 Holland et al. Jan 2008 B2
7336356 Vannuffelen et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337660 Ibrahim et al. Mar 2008 B2
7347267 Morys et al. Mar 2008 B2
7362422 DiFoggio et al. Apr 2008 B2
7372264 Akkurt et al. May 2008 B2
7377217 Swanson May 2008 B2
7387021 DiFoggio Jun 2008 B2
7395704 DiFoggio Jul 2008 B2
7398159 Venkataramanan et al. Jul 2008 B2
7408645 DiFoggio Aug 2008 B2
7423258 DiFoggio et al. Sep 2008 B2
7440098 Christian et al. Oct 2008 B2
7461547 Terabayashi et al. Dec 2008 B2
7475593 Odom Jan 2009 B2
7482811 Freedman et al. Jan 2009 B2
7484563 Zazovsky et al. Feb 2009 B2
7490428 Morys Feb 2009 B2
7490664 Skinner et al. Feb 2009 B2
7498567 Brady Mar 2009 B2
7508506 Christian et al. Mar 2009 B2
7511813 Vannuffelen et al. Mar 2009 B2
7511819 DiFoggio Mar 2009 B2
7511823 Schultz et al. Mar 2009 B2
7520158 DiFoggio Apr 2009 B2
7526953 Goodwin et al. May 2009 B2
7530265 DiFoggio May 2009 B2
7532129 Radzinski May 2009 B2
7542142 Wu et al. Jun 2009 B2
7571644 Ibrahim et al. Aug 2009 B2
7576856 DiFoggio Aug 2009 B2
7579841 San Martin et al. Aug 2009 B2
7595876 DiFoggio Sep 2009 B2
7601950 Kischkat et al. Oct 2009 B2
7609380 Vannuffelen et al. Oct 2009 B2
7696756 Morys et al. Apr 2010 B2
7697141 Jones et al. Apr 2010 B2
7762131 Ibrahim et al. Jul 2010 B2
7784350 Pelletier Aug 2010 B2
7800513 Morys Sep 2010 B2
7938175 Skinner et al. May 2011 B2
7976780 Elrod et al. Jul 2011 B2
20030048441 Manning Mar 2003 A1
20040023407 Casal et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040069942 Fujisawa et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040152028 Singh et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040159002 Carlucci et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050007583 DiFoggio Jan 2005 A1
20050019955 Dahl et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050052105 Schmidt Mar 2005 A1
20050099618 DiFoggio et al. May 2005 A1
20050213313 Baumberg et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060052963 Shkarlet Mar 2006 A1
20060142955 Jones et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070035736 Vannuffelen et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070103162 Morys et al. May 2007 A1
20080106176 Andorfer et al. May 2008 A1
20080125335 Bhavsar May 2008 A1
20080297808 Riza et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090095529 Rezgui et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090107667 Mullins et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090120637 Kirkwood et al. May 2009 A1
20090151939 Bailey et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090199630 DiFoggio et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090288820 Barron et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100148787 Morys et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100153048 Myrick et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100231225 Morys et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100265094 Zannoni et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110023594 Pelletier et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110181870 Penney et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110251794 Bittar et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120018152 Zuilekom et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120150451 Skinner et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120211650 Jones et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130087723 Pelletier et al. Apr 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
2009356978 Jun 2011 AU
177816 Mar 1922 GB
310895 Oct 1930 GB
1088268 Oct 1967 GB
2064217 Jun 1981 GB
2441069 Feb 2008 GB
H0227686 Jan 1990 JP
2003157807 May 2003 JP
WO-2004003984 Jan 2004 WO
WO-2011063086 May 2011 WO
WO-2011078869 Jun 2011 WO
WO-2011153190 Dec 2011 WO
WO-2011159289 Dec 2011 WO
WO-2012161693 Nov 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (19)
Entry
Faklaris, Orestis et al., “Comparison of the Photoluminescence Properties of Semiconductor Quantum Dots and Non-Blinking Diamond Nanoparticles. Observation of the Diffusion of Diamond Nanoparticlesin Living Cells”, J. European Optical Society, v4, 2009, 8 pgs.
Myrick, M. L., et al., “Application of Multivariate Optical Computing to Simple Near-Infrared Point Measurements”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4574, (2002), pp. 208-215.
Zhang, Wei et al., “Downhole Optical Fluid Analyzer Having Intermittently Driven Filter Wheel”, PCT Appl No. US11/37662, filed May 24, 2011, 11 pgs.
Zhang, Wei et al., “Method to Increase the Number of Filters per Optical Path in a Downhole Spectrometer”, PCT Appl No. PCT/US11/03655, filed May 24, 2011, 12 pgs.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 3, 2013, Appl No. PCT/US10/038747, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 7 pgs.
First CN Office Action, dated Feb. 5, 2013, Appl No. 200980157701.3, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 13 pgs.
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 18 pgs.
Canadian Examiner Letter, dated Oct. 24, 2012, Appl No. 2,756,285, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 2 pgs.
US Final Office Action, dated May 31, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 18 pgs.
AU First Examination Report, dated Jun. 24, 2013, Appl No. 2010355321, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 6, 2010, 3 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jul. 2, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/510,231, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed May 16, 2012, 38 pgs.
Supplementary European Search Report, dated Sep. 2, 2013, Appl No. 10853352.2, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emissions”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 13 pgs.
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 24, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 22 pgs.
CA Examiner'S Letter, dated Jul. 31, 2013, Appl No. 2,781,331, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed May 16, 2012, 6 pgs.
European Search Report, dated Dec. 12, 2013, Appl No. 09852686.6, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 7 pgs.
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 4, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool,” filed Aug. 2, 2014, 25 pgs.
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 17, 2014, Appl No. 2013/510,231Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission, filed May 16, 2012, 18 pgs.
CN Notice of First Office Action, dated Sep. 12, 2014, Appl No. 201080065565.8, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission,” Filed Jun. 16, 2010, 21 pgs.
AU Examination Report No. 1, dated Nov. 11, 2014, Appl No. 2014200604, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission,” Filed Jun. 16, 2010, 2 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120211650 A1 Aug 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61262895 Nov 2009 US