Spectroscopic analysis is popular method for determining compositions of fluids and other materials in a laboratory environment. However, implementing spectroscopic analysis in a downhole tool is a difficult task due to a number of obstacles, not the least of which is the great range of operating temperatures in which the tool must operate. If such obstacles were adequately addressed, a downhole optical radiometry tool could be used to analyze and monitor different properties of various fluids in situ.
For example, when formation fluid sampling tools draw fluid samples there is always a question of how much contamination (e.g., from drilling fluid in the borehole) exists in the sample stream and how much pumping must be done before the contamination level drops to an acceptable level. A downhole optical radiometry tool can measure various indicators of contamination, identify trends, and determine a completion time for the sampling process. Further, the downhole optical radiometry tool could be used to characterize the fluid composition to measure, e.g., water, light hydrocarbons, a distribution of hydrocarbon types (e.g., the so-called SARA measurement of saturated oils, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes), H2S concentrations, and CO2 concentrations. Moreover, PVT properties can be predicted, e.g., by measurements of Gas-Oil Ratios. The fluid compositions can be compared to those of fluids from other wells to measure reservoir connectivity. Such measurements can be the basis for formulating multi-billion dollar production strategies and recovery assessments, so accuracy and reliability are key concerns.
The following detailed description should be considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a and 4b show a second illustrative downhole optical radiometry wireline tool embodiment;
a shows a first illustrative LWD tool embodiment;
b and 5c show a second illustrative LWD tool embodiment;
It is noted that the drawings and detailed description are directed to specific illustrative embodiments of the invention. It should be understood, however, that the illustrated and described embodiments are not intended to limit the disclosure, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Accordingly, disclosed herein are various embodiments for a method and tool to optically analyze downhole fluid properties in situ. In at least some embodiments, a disclosed downhole optical radiometry tool includes a tool body having a downhole sample cell for fluid flow. A light source transmits a light beam through the fluid flow and a spectral operation unit (SOU) such as a prism, filter, interferometer, or multivariate optical element (MOE). The resulting light strikes at least one of multiple electrically balanced thermopiles, producing a signal indicative of one or more properties of the fluid. The balanced thermopiles enable a high degree of sensitivity over a wide temperature range. Further sensitivity can be provided by maintaining the thermopile substrates at a constant temperature, modulating the light downstream of the sample cell, and/or by providing a reference light beam that does not interact with the fluid flow. To provide a wide spectral range, some tool embodiments include multiple filaments in the light source, each filament having a different emission spectrum. The light from such wideband light sources can be better collimated using mirrors and apertures instead of lenses. Moreover, some tool embodiments include a second light source, sample cell, SOU, and detector to provide increased range, flexibility, and reliability. The tool can be a wireline tool, a tubing-conveyed tool, or a logging while drilling (LWD) tool.
In at least some embodiments, a disclosed downhole fluid analysis method includes: passing a sample of fluid through a downhole sample cell where a light beam interacts with said sample fluid; and receiving the light beam with a light detector after the light beam passes through a spectral operation unit (SOU). The light detector can include two electrically balanced thermopiles with at least one thermopile shielded from the light beam. Some method and tool embodiments employ a wheel having multiple SOUs that can be sequentially moved into the light path to provide measurements of different fluid properties. In some configurations, the wheel can in some cases surround a central flow passage through the tool.
These and other aspects of the disclosed tools and methods are best understood in the context of the larger systems in which they operate. Accordingly, an illustrative logging while drilling (LWD) environment is shown in
Some wells can employ acoustic telemetry for LWD. Downhole sensors (including downhole optical radiometry tool 126) are coupled to a telemetry module 128 including an acoustic telemetry transmitter that transmits telemetry signals in the form of acoustic vibrations in the tubing wall of drill string 108. An acoustic telemetry receiver array 130 may be coupled to tubing below the top drive 110 to receive transmitted telemetry signals. One or more repeater modules 132 may be optionally provided along the drill string to receive and retransmit the telemetry signals. Other telemetry techniques that can be employed include mud pulse telemetry, electromagnetic telemetry, and wired drill pipe telemetry.
At various times during the drilling process, the drill string 108 is removed from the borehole as shown in
As explained in greater detail below, the optical radiometry tools 318, 320 in tool 302 enable downhole measurement of various fluid properties including contamination level, gas concentration, and composition. Such measurements can be employed in deciding whether and when to take or keep a fluid sample for transport to the surface, and can even assist in determining repositioning of the tool for additional sampling operations. The inclusion of two tools offers an increased range of flexibility in the measurements that can be performed by the tool and/or increased reliability or resolution through the use of redundant components. Moreover, the use of two tools at different points on the flow line enables monitoring of fluid flow dynamics including flow velocities of different fluid phases.
A secondary light path 440 is formed by a light guide 422 that intercepts a non-collimated portion of the light from light source 416 and directs it to a beam splitter 436, which in this case operates to combine the primary and secondary light paths on the last segment through the circular wheel 420 to the detector 422. Suitable materials for the beam splitter include zinc sulfide and zinc selenide. Shutters 434 and 444 can selectively gate light from the primary and secondary light paths. Since light from both paths can be alternately directed onto the detector, the tool can compensate for aging, temperature, and other effects on the various system components including variation of the light source intensity and spectrum.
In an alternative embodiment, a movable mirror place of the beam splitter 436 can eliminate the need for shutters 434 and 444. In addition to selecting one of the light paths, the shutters or movable mirror can be used to modulate the light signal before it strikes the detector, an operation which may offer increased measurement sensitivity. Alternatively, modulation could be provided using a chopper wheel (a rotating disk having spokes to alternately block and pass light traveling along the optical axis).
A motor 450 turns the wheel 420 via a gearing arrangement that includes a position resolver 452. The resolver 452 enables the tool electronics to track the position of the wheel 420 and thereby determine which (if any) SOU is on the optical axis. In some embodiments, the wheel 420 includes an open aperture 415 (see
In at least some embodiments, the light source 416 takes the form of an electrically heated tungsten filament (e.g., in a tungsten halogen bulb) that produces a broad spectrum of electromagnetic emissions including visible and infrared wavelengths. The emission spectrum mimics a blackbody radiation curve. The filament is trapped in a small insulated volume to improve the heating efficiency. The volume is windowed by a transparent material (such as quartz, sapphire, ZnS) to help trap heat, while enabling light to escape. The filament may also be altered in composition to improve performance. Other materials may include tungsten alloys or carbon with carbon nanostructures being the most probable candidates. Potentially, the light source's bulb may include photonic crystals or blackbody radiators to convert some of the visible radiation into IR radiation, thereby enhancing the source's intensity in the IR band.
A series of reflectors collimates light from the light source and directs it along the primary light path (sometimes referred to herein as the optical axis). The reflectors can be designed to provide relatively uniform intensity across a region of investigation in the sample cell, or in some cases they can be designed to concentrate the light to a line or sharp point focus to promote an interaction with the fluid. For example, a line focus can be provided using an elongated parabolic trough. The light incident on the SOUs can similarly be given a relatively uniform intensity distribution or brought to a line or sharp point focus. Strong collimation is not crucial to the tool's operation. Some contemplated tool embodiments provide only a moderate degree of collimation (with a divergence half angle of up to 30°) and use a short waveguide as an integrating rod to contain and homogenize the emitted light.
A portion of the emitted light can be diverted and routed along a separate optical path to the detector to act as a reference beam. In addition or as an alternative to reflectors, optical light pipes (e.g., waveguides or optical fibers) can be used to guide the primary and/or secondary light beams along portions of their routes. Such an optical light pipe 442 is shown in
In
In at least some embodiments, the desired spot size (measured perpendicular to the optical axis in the center of the sample cell) is greater than ⅜ inch and less than ½ inch. The desired collimation is less than 7.5 RMS angular distribution within the spot with less than 3 RMS being more desirable. A homogenization of better than 10% RSD is most desirable within the spot with better than 5% being more desirable. An efficiency of better than 50% collimated power within the spot size (total emission—filament absorption) is desirable with better than 60% being more desirable and greater than 70% being most desirable.
The optical windows in sample cell 417 are sealed into an Inconel pressure vessel with brazing of sapphire to Inconell envisioned as the current method. Alternative methods include gasket seals on a front window etched for positive pressure, or compressive o-ring seals which may include compressive spacers and/or gaskets. The envisioned transmission gap is seen as 1 mm with 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm being the contemplated range of possibly suitable gaps. In some embodiments, the inner window surfaces provide a variable gap distance to enable detection of fluids of wide optical densities. The optical densities are expected to vary from 0.1 to 10 optical density normally with up to 60 optical density units at times. The variable path length may be achieved by varying the shape of the second receiving window surface in contact with the fluid.
The spectral operation units (SOUs) 421 are shown interacting with the light after it has passed through the sample cell. (This configuration is not required, as it would be possible to have the light pass through the SOU before entering the sample cell.) As the light interacts with the fluid, the light spectrum becomes imprinted with the optical characteristics of the fluid. The interaction of the light with the fluid is a transformation of the optical properties of the light. The SOU provides further processing of the light spectrum to enable one or more light intensity sensors to collect measurements from which properties of the fluid can be ascertained.
The tool embodiments illustrated in
However, it may in some cases be undesirable to have the flow passage deviate from the central axis of the tool body. Accordingly,
The wheel can include SOUs in the form of optical filters that selectively pass or block certain wavelengths of light, thereby enabling the processor to collect measurements of spectral intensity at specific wavelengths. Alternatively or in addition, the wheel can include SOUs in the form of multivariate optical elements (MOEs). MOEs offer a way to process the entire spectrum of the incident light to measure how well it matches to a given spectral template. In this manner, different MOEs can provide measurements of different fluid properties. In some system embodiments, the MOEs measure spectral character across the range from 350 nm to 6000 nm. Some contemplated downhole optical radiometry tools include MOEs that operate on light across the spectral range from 200 nm to 14,000 nm. To cover this range, some tool embodiments employ multiple light sources or a light source with multiple filaments or otherwise enhanced emission ranges.
Multiple MOEs are included in some downhole optical radiometry tools to provide a range of measurements such as, e.g., concentrations of water, H2S, CO2, light hydrocarbons (Methane, Ethane, Propane, Butanes, Pentanes, Hexanes and Heptanes), diesel, saturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, resins, asphaltenes, olefins, and/or esters. Collective measurements of gases and oils can also be obtained by MOEs and processed by the processor to measure Gas-Oil Ratio or other properties such as equation of state, bubble point, precipitation point or other Pressure-Volume-Temperature properties, viscosity, contamination, and other fluid properties. Moreover, by monitoring the manner in which measurements change over time, the processor can detect and identify different fluid phases and the various rates at which those phases pass through the analysis region.
In at least some tool embodiments, the wheel includes multiple rows of angularly-aligned filters at corresponding radii. For example, one embodiment includes two rows, with the inner and outer SOUs at each given angular position being matched to provide detector normalization (e.g., the sole difference might be the coating on the outer SOU). In another two-row embodiment, the inner and outer SOUs are complementary filters or MOEs. The light from both paths alternately strikes the same detector, thereby enabling cancellation of temperature, aging, and other environmental effects. (Note that the complementary SOUs could have fully complementary spectra or just different pass bands. Either case allows for differential measurements that provide cancellation of common mode noise.)
The light sensor 610 receives the light that has been influenced by both the sample cell 606 and the SOU 611. Various forms of light sensors are contemplated including quantum-effect photodetectors (such as photodiodes, photoresistors, phototransistors, photovoltaic cells, and photomultiplier tubes) and thermal-effect photodectors (such as pyroelectric detectors, Golay cells, thermocouples, thermopiles, and thermistors). Most quantum-effect photodetectors are semiconductor based, e.g., silicon, InGaAs, PbS, and PbSe. In tools operating in only the visible and/or near infrared, both quantum-effect photodetectors and thermal-effect photodetectors are suitable. In tools operating across wider spectral ranges, thermal-effect photodetectors are preferred. One contemplated tool embodiment employs a combined detector made up of a silicon photodiode stacked above an InGaAs photodiode.
Some contemplated downhole optical radiometry tool embodiments employ two electrically balanced thermopiles as a photodetector. One thermopile is exposed to light traveling along the optical axis, while the other thermopile is shielded from such light and is used as a baseline reference when detecting the first thermopile's response to the light. Such a configuration offers an effective cancellation of environmental factors such as temperature, thereby providing enhanced sensitivity over a wide range of environmental conditions. Sensitivity can be further enhanced by heating the photodetector substrates and maintaining them at a constant temperature near or above the expected environmental temperature, or at least to a temperature where the effects of any further temperature increases are negligible. One contemplated environmental temperature range is from 40° to 400° F., with the detector temperature being maintained above 200° F.
The sensitivity may be further enhanced with the use of a secondary correction circuit, possibly in the form of an adaptive compensation circuit that adjusts a transducer bias current or voltage prior to signal amplification. The adjustments would be performed using standard adaptation techniques for compensating systematic sensing errors.
A shutter or chopper wheel can be used to modulation the light beam before it strikes the photodetector. Such modulation provides a way to measure the photodector signal in alternating light and dark states, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of the tool electronics to that portion of the signal attributable to the incident light. If the electrical signal is proportional to the light intensity, it provides a direct measure of the fluid property that the filter or MOE is designed to provide (assuming that the processor is calibrated to properly compensate for light source variations). The processor samples, processes, and combines the electronic output of the light sensor 610 to obtain the fluid properties of interest. As previously mentioned, these properties can include not only formation fluid composition, but also levels of contamination from drilling fluid (measurable by detecting such components as esters, olefins, diesel, and water), time-based trends in contamination, and reservoir compartmentalization or connectivity information based on composition or photometric signature.
As illustrated in
Beam splitter 906 passes the main portion of the light beam to an optical guide 912 such as, e.g., a calcium fluoride rod. The optical guide 912 communicates the light to sample cell 914, where the light passes through fluid between two transparent windows. Light exiting the sample cell passes along a second optical guide 916 to a second beam splitter 918 that directs a portion of the light to a second light sensor 920. Processor 910 digitizes and processes the signal from sensor 920 to monitor optical density of the fluid and calibrate the brightness of the light incident on the SOU.
Beam splitter 918 passes the bulk of the light beam to wheel 922 where it interacts with a SOU such as a filter or MOE before passing through a shutter to reach light sensor 926. The shutter 924 modulates the light beam to increase the sensitivity of light sensor 926. Processor 920 digitizes and processes the signal from sensor 926 in combination with the measurements of sensors 920 and 908 to determine one or more fluid property measurements. As the wheel 922 turns, other SOUs are brought into the light path to increase the number of measurement types that are collected and processed by processor 910. Each of the sensors can employ the electrically balanced thermopiles to improve the tool's performance across a wide temperature range.
Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/262,895, filed Nov. 19, 2009, by Inventors Christopher M. Jones, Stephen A. Zannoni, Michael T. Pelletier, Raj Pai, Wei Zhang, Marian L. Morys, and Robert Atkinson. The foregoing application is hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/057172 | 11/18/2010 | WO | 00 | 4/19/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/063086 | 5/26/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
223898 | Edison | Jan 1880 | A |
2757300 | Laidig | Jul 1956 | A |
2972251 | Harper | Feb 1961 | A |
3371574 | Dwyer | Mar 1968 | A |
3449546 | Dhoble | Jun 1969 | A |
3734629 | Griffiths et al. | May 1973 | A |
4103174 | McClatchie et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4160929 | Thorington et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4370886 | Smith, Jr. et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4375164 | Dodge et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4499955 | Campbell et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4606636 | Monin et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4635735 | Crownover | Jan 1987 | A |
4696903 | Owen | Sep 1987 | A |
4722612 | Junkert et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4774396 | Salit et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4791310 | Honig et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800279 | Hieftje et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802761 | Bowen et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4839516 | Freeman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4994671 | Safinya et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4996421 | Rai et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5126570 | Boos | Jun 1992 | A |
5161409 | Hughes et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5166747 | Schroeder et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
RE34153 | Benner et al. | Dec 1992 | E |
5167149 | Mullins et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5201220 | Mullins et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5258620 | Sueyasu et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5284054 | Loebach | Feb 1994 | A |
5304492 | Klinkhammer | Apr 1994 | A |
5306909 | Jones et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5331156 | Hines et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5331399 | Tank et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341207 | Tank et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5360738 | Jones et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368669 | Maine et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5457259 | Elgarhy et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5517024 | Mullins et al. | May 1996 | A |
5557103 | Hughes et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5621523 | Oobayashi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5729013 | Bergren, III | Mar 1998 | A |
5790432 | Morys | Aug 1998 | A |
5859430 | Mullins et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5912459 | Mullins et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5939717 | Mullins | Aug 1999 | A |
5946641 | Morys | Aug 1999 | A |
6006844 | Van Puymbroeck et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023340 | Wu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040191 | Grow | Mar 2000 | A |
6075611 | Dussan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6140637 | Mullins et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6162766 | Muir et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176323 | Weirich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178815 | Felling et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181427 | Yarussi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6218662 | Tchakarov et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220371 | Sharma et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6268726 | Prammer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268911 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274865 | Schroer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6350986 | Mullins et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355928 | Skinner et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362619 | Prammer et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6388251 | Papanyan | May 2002 | B1 |
6401529 | Robison et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403949 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437326 | Yamate et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6465775 | Mullins et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6474152 | Mullins et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476384 | Mullins et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501072 | Mullins et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6507401 | Turner et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518756 | Morys et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6583621 | Prammer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6627873 | Tchakarov et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6678050 | Pope et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683681 | DiFoggio et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6704109 | Wu et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707556 | Turner et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714872 | DiFoggio et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6729400 | Mullins et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6765384 | Morys | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768105 | Mullins et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6788066 | Wisler et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6794652 | Walkow | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798518 | DiFoggio et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6825659 | Prammer et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6853452 | Laufer | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6888127 | Jones et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927846 | Smith et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956204 | Dong et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967322 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967722 | Manning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975112 | Morys et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988547 | Goodwin et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992768 | Dong et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995360 | Jones et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997055 | DiFoggio | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002142 | Mullins et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016026 | DiFoggio et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7061168 | Schmidt | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7081615 | Betancourt et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7084392 | DiFoggio et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095012 | Fujisawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105849 | Prelewitz | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7142306 | Wu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7173239 | DiFoggio | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195731 | Jones | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196786 | DiFoggio | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7210343 | Shammai et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7214933 | DiFoggio et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7243536 | Bolze et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245382 | Ronnekleiv | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248370 | Jones | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251037 | Jones | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7279678 | Andrews et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7280214 | DiFoggio et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293613 | Goldberg et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299136 | DiFoggio et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305306 | Venkataramanan et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315377 | Holland et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7336356 | Vannuffelen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337660 | Ibrahim et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347267 | Morys et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362422 | DiFoggio et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372264 | Akkurt et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377217 | Swanson | May 2008 | B2 |
7387021 | DiFoggio | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395704 | DiFoggio | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7398159 | Venkataramanan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408645 | DiFoggio | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7423258 | DiFoggio et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440098 | Christian et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7461547 | Terabayashi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475593 | Odom | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482811 | Freedman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7484563 | Zazovsky et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7490428 | Morys | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7490664 | Skinner et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498567 | Brady | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508506 | Christian et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511813 | Vannuffelen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511819 | DiFoggio | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511823 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7520158 | DiFoggio | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526953 | Goodwin et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7530265 | DiFoggio | May 2009 | B2 |
7532129 | Radzinski | May 2009 | B2 |
7542142 | Wu et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571644 | Ibrahim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7576856 | DiFoggio | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579841 | San Martin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7595876 | DiFoggio | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601950 | Kischkat et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609380 | Vannuffelen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7696756 | Morys et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697141 | Jones et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7762131 | Ibrahim et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7784350 | Pelletier | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800513 | Morys | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7938175 | Skinner et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7976780 | Elrod et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20030048441 | Manning | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040023407 | Casal et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040069942 | Fujisawa et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040152028 | Singh et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040159002 | Carlucci et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050007583 | DiFoggio | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019955 | Dahl et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050052105 | Schmidt | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050099618 | DiFoggio et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050213313 | Baumberg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060052963 | Shkarlet | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060142955 | Jones et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070035736 | Vannuffelen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070103162 | Morys et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080106176 | Andorfer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125335 | Bhavsar | May 2008 | A1 |
20080297808 | Riza et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090095529 | Rezgui et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090107667 | Mullins et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120637 | Kirkwood et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151939 | Bailey et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199630 | DiFoggio et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090288820 | Barron et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100148787 | Morys et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153048 | Myrick et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100231225 | Morys et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265094 | Zannoni et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110023594 | Pelletier et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110181870 | Penney et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110251794 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120018152 | Zuilekom et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120150451 | Skinner et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120211650 | Jones et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130087723 | Pelletier et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009356978 | Jun 2011 | AU |
177816 | Mar 1922 | GB |
310895 | Oct 1930 | GB |
1088268 | Oct 1967 | GB |
2064217 | Jun 1981 | GB |
2441069 | Feb 2008 | GB |
H0227686 | Jan 1990 | JP |
2003157807 | May 2003 | JP |
WO-2004003984 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2011063086 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011078869 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO-2011153190 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2011159289 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012161693 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Faklaris, Orestis et al., “Comparison of the Photoluminescence Properties of Semiconductor Quantum Dots and Non-Blinking Diamond Nanoparticles. Observation of the Diffusion of Diamond Nanoparticlesin Living Cells”, J. European Optical Society, v4, 2009, 8 pgs. |
Myrick, M. L., et al., “Application of Multivariate Optical Computing to Simple Near-Infrared Point Measurements”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4574, (2002), pp. 208-215. |
Zhang, Wei et al., “Downhole Optical Fluid Analyzer Having Intermittently Driven Filter Wheel”, PCT Appl No. US11/37662, filed May 24, 2011, 11 pgs. |
Zhang, Wei et al., “Method to Increase the Number of Filters per Optical Path in a Downhole Spectrometer”, PCT Appl No. PCT/US11/03655, filed May 24, 2011, 12 pgs. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 3, 2013, Appl No. PCT/US10/038747, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 7 pgs. |
First CN Office Action, dated Feb. 5, 2013, Appl No. 200980157701.3, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 13 pgs. |
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Mar. 26, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 18 pgs. |
Canadian Examiner Letter, dated Oct. 24, 2012, Appl No. 2,756,285, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 2 pgs. |
US Final Office Action, dated May 31, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 18 pgs. |
AU First Examination Report, dated Jun. 24, 2013, Appl No. 2010355321, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed Jun. 6, 2010, 3 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action, dated Jul. 2, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/510,231, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed May 16, 2012, 38 pgs. |
Supplementary European Search Report, dated Sep. 2, 2013, Appl No. 10853352.2, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emissions”, filed Jun. 16, 2010, 13 pgs. |
US Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 24, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 22 pgs. |
CA Examiner'S Letter, dated Jul. 31, 2013, Appl No. 2,781,331, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission”, filed May 16, 2012, 6 pgs. |
European Search Report, dated Dec. 12, 2013, Appl No. 09852686.6, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool”, filed Dec. 23, 2009, 7 pgs. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 4, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/147,478, “Interferometry-Based Downhole Analysis Tool,” filed Aug. 2, 2014, 25 pgs. |
US Final Office Action, dated Apr. 17, 2014, Appl No. 2013/510,231Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission, filed May 16, 2012, 18 pgs. |
CN Notice of First Office Action, dated Sep. 12, 2014, Appl No. 201080065565.8, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission,” Filed Jun. 16, 2010, 21 pgs. |
AU Examination Report No. 1, dated Nov. 11, 2014, Appl No. 2014200604, “Downhole Sources Having Enhanced IR Emission,” Filed Jun. 16, 2010, 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120211650 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61262895 | Nov 2009 | US |