Downhole phase separation in deviated wells

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11994016
  • Patent Number
    11,994,016
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 9, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 28, 2024
    11 months ago
Abstract
A packer, disposed in a deviated portion of a well, seals with an inner wall of the well. A first tubular, extending through the packer, receives a wellbore fluid via first inlet. A first outlet of the first tubular discharges the wellbore fluid into an annulus within the well, uphole of the packer. A second tubular, coupled to the first tubular, receives at least a liquid portion of the wellbore fluid via a second inlet. The second tubular directs the liquid portion of the wellbore fluid to a downhole artificial lift system. A sump, defined by a region of an annulus between the inner wall of the well and the first tubular, receives at least a portion of solid material carried by the wellbore fluid.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to downhole phase separation in subterranean formations, and in particular, in deviated wells.


BACKGROUND

Gas reservoirs that have naturally low reservoir pressures can be susceptible to liquid loading at some point in the production life of a well due to the reservoir's inability to provide sufficient pressure to carry wellbore liquids to the surface. As liquids accumulate, slug flow of gas and liquid phases can be encountered, especially in deviated wells. As a deviated well turns vertically at a heel, gas can segregate and migrate upward in comparison to liquid due to the effects of gravity and collect to form gas slugs. Slug flows are unstable and can bring solids issues and pumping interferences, which can result in an increase in operating expenses, excessive workover costs, and insufficient pressure drawdown.


SUMMARY

This disclosure describes technologies relating to downhole phase separation in subterranean formations, and in particular, in deviated wells. Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a system. The system includes a packer, a first tubular, a second tubular, and a connector. The packer is configured to be disposed in a deviated portion of a well formed in a subterranean formation. The packer is configured to form a seal with an inner wall of the well. The first tubular extends through the packer and has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than a cross-sectional flow area of the well. The first tubular includes a first inlet and a first outlet portion. The first inlet is configured to receive a wellbore fluid. The first outlet portion is configured to induce separation of a gaseous portion of the wellbore fluid from a remainder of the wellbore fluid, such that the gaseous portion flows uphole through an annulus between the inner wall of the well and the first tubular. The second tubular includes a second inlet and a second outlet. The second inlet is configured to receive at least a liquid portion of the remainder of the wellbore fluid. The second outlet is configured to discharge the liquid portion of the remainder of the wellbore fluid. The connector is coupled to the first tubular and the second tubular. The connector is coupled to the first outlet portion of the first tubular, such that the connector is configured to prevent flow of the wellbore fluid from the first tubular through the connector. The connector is configured to fluidically connect the second tubular to a downhole artificial lift system disposed within the well, uphole of the connector. A sump for accumulation of solid material from the wellbore fluid is defined by a region of the annulus between the inner wall of the well and the first tubular, downhole of the second inlet of the second tubular and uphole of the packer.


This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features. The deviated portion of the well in which the packer is disposed can have a deviation angle in a range of from 70 degrees (°) to 90° (horizontal). The first tubular can include a first portion near the first inlet. The first portion can have a first deviation angle. The first outlet portion can have a second deviation angle that is less than the first deviation angle. The first outlet portion of the first tubular can define perforations. The perforations can be configured to induce separation of the gaseous portion of the wellbore fluid from the remainder of the wellbore fluid as the wellbore fluid flows through the perforations. The second tubular can have a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than the cross-sectional flow area of the first tubular. The first tubular can extend past the packer. The first inlet can be positioned downhole in comparison to the packer.


Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a system. The system includes a packer, a first tubular, and a second tubular. The packer is configured to be disposed in a deviated portion of a well formed in a subterranean formation. The packer is configured to form a seal with an inner wall of the well. The first tubular extends through the packer. The first tubular has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than a cross-sectional flow area of the well. The first tubular includes a first inlet and a first outlet. The first inlet is configured to receive a wellbore fluid. The first outlet is configured to discharge the wellbore fluid into an annulus within the well, uphole of the packer. The second tubular is coupled to the first tubular. The second tubular includes a second inlet and a second outlet. The second inlet is configured to receive at least a liquid portion of the wellbore fluid. The second outlet is configured to discharge the liquid portion of the wellbore fluid to a downhole artificial lift system disposed within the well. The first tubular and the second tubular share a common wall that defines a divided section. The first outlet of the first tubular is disposed at an uphole end of the divided section. The second inlet of the second tubular is disposed at a downhole end of the divided section. A sump for accumulation of solid material from the wellbore fluid is defined by a region of an annulus between the inner wall of the well and the first tubular, downhole of the second inlet of the second tubular and uphole of the packer.


This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features. The deviated portion of the well in which the packer is disposed can have a deviation angle in a range of from 70 degrees (°) to 90° (horizontal). The first tubular can include a first portion near the first inlet. The first portion can have a first deviation angle. The first tubular can include a second portion near the first outlet. The second portion can have a second deviation angle less than the first deviation angle. The second tubular can have a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than the cross-sectional flow area of the first tubular. The first tubular can extend past the packer. The first inlet can be positioned downhole in comparison to the packer.


Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a method. A packer is disposed in a deviated portion of a well formed in a subterranean formation. The packer seals with an inner wall of the well. A first tubular extends through the packer. The first tubular has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than a cross-sectional flow area of the well. The first tubular includes a first inlet and a first outlet. The first tubular receives a wellbore fluid via the first inlet. The first outlet discharges the wellbore fluid into an annulus within the well, uphole of the packer. A second tubular is coupled to the first tubular. The second tubular includes a second inlet. The second tubular receives at least a liquid portion of the wellbore fluid via the second inlet. The second tubular directs the liquid portion of the wellbore fluid to a downhole artificial lift system disposed within the well. A sump is defined by a region of an annulus between the inner wall of the well and the first tubular, downhole of the second inlet of the second tubular and uphole of the packer. The sump receives at least a portion of solid material carried by the wellbore fluid.


This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features. The deviated portion of the well in which the packer is disposed can have a deviation angle in a range of from 70 degrees (°) to 90° (horizontal). The first tubular can include a first portion near the first inlet. The first portion can have a first deviation angle. The first tubular can include a second portion near the first outlet. The second portion can have a second deviation angle that is less than the first deviation angle. The second tubular can have a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than the cross-sectional flow area of the first tubular. The first tubular can extend past the packer. The first inlet can be positioned downhole in comparison to the packer. The first tubular and the second tubular can share a common wall that defines a divided section. The first outlet of the first tubular can be disposed at an uphole end of the divided section. The second inlet of the second tubular can be disposed at a downhole end of the divided section. Fluid flowing from the first tubular to the second tubular can flow into the annulus before entering the second tubular. The first tubular and the second tubular can be coupled by a connector. The connector can prevent the wellbore fluid from flowing from the first tubular and through the connector. The connector can fluidically connect the second tubular to the downhole artificial lift system. The first tubular can include multiple outlets. The first outlet can be one of the outlets. The multiple outlets of the first tubular can induce separation of a gaseous portion of the wellbore fluid from a remainder of the wellbore fluid as the wellbore fluid flows out of the first tubular through the multiple outlets.


The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter of this disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an example phase separator implemented in a well.



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an example phase separator implemented in a well.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart of an example method for separating phases in a well.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A phase separation system includes a seal that seals against a wall of a wellbore. A first tubular extends through the seal. The first tubular includes an inlet downhole of the packer that receives a wellbore fluid. The first tubular includes an outlet uphole of the packer that discharges the wellbore fluid into an annulus between the first tubular and the wall of the wellbore, uphole of the packer. A gaseous portion of the wellbore fluid separates from a remainder of the wellbore fluid and flows uphole through the annulus to the surface. The first tubular is coupled to a second tubular. The second tubular includes an inlet downhole of the outlet of the first tubular and uphole of the packer. The inlet of the second tubular receives at least a liquid portion of the wellbore fluid discharged by the first tubular. The second tubular includes an outlet uphole of the inlet of the second tubular that discharges the liquid portion of the wellbore fluid. The liquid portion of the wellbore fluid discharged by the second tubular flows to a downhole artificial lift system to be produced to the surface. A sump is defined by a region of the annulus downhole of the inlet of the second tubular and uphole of the packer. The sump can accumulate solid material carried by the wellbore fluid.


The subject matter described in this disclosure can be implemented in particular implementations, so as to realize one or more of the following advantages. The phase separation systems described herein can effectively mitigate and/or eliminate downhole slugging issues in wells, and in particular, in deviated wells. The phase separation systems described herein can mitigate and/or eliminate liquid loading issues in wells, and in particular, in deviated wells. The phase separation systems described herein can reduce a cross-sectional flow area of multi-phase wellbore fluids in comparison to a cross-sectional flow area of an annulus of a well for gas flow, which can facilitate downhole gas-liquid separation and also mitigate and/or eliminate gas carry-under and liquid carry-over in wells, and in particular, in deviated wells. The phase separation systems described herein can reduce costs associated with well completion operations.



FIG. 1 depicts an example well 100 constructed in accordance with the concepts herein. The well 100 extends from the surface through the Earth 108 to one more subterranean zones of interest. The well 100 enables access to the subterranean zones of interest to allow recovery (that is, production) of fluids to the surface and, in some implementations, additionally or alternatively allows fluids to be placed in the Earth 108. In some implementations, the subterranean zone is a formation within the Earth 108 defining a reservoir, but in other instances, the zone can be multiple formations or a portion of a formation. The subterranean zone can include, for example, a formation, a portion of a formation, or multiple formations in a hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir from which recovery operations can be practiced to recover trapped hydrocarbons. In some implementations, the subterranean zone includes an underground formation of naturally fractured or porous rock containing hydrocarbons (for example, oil, gas, or both). In some implementations, the well can intersect other types of formations, including reservoirs that are not naturally fractured. The well 100 can be a deviated well with a wellbore deviated from vertical (for example, horizontal or slanted), the well 100 can include multiple bores forming a multilateral well (that is, a well having multiple lateral wells branching off another well or wells), or both.


In some implementations, the well 100 is a gas well that is used in producing hydrocarbon gas (such as natural gas) from the subterranean zones of interest to the surface. While termed a “gas well,” the well need not produce only dry gas, and may incidentally or in much smaller quantities, produce liquid including oil, water, or both. In some implementations, the well 100 is an oil well that is used in producing hydrocarbon liquid (such as crude oil) from the subterranean zones of interest to the surface. While termed an “oil well,” the well not need produce only hydrocarbon liquid, and may incidentally or in much smaller quantities, produce gas, water, or both. The production from the well 100 can be multiphase in any ratio. In some implementations, the production from the well 100 can produce mostly or entirely liquid at certain times and mostly or entirely gas at other times. For example, in certain types of wells it is common to produce water for a period of time to gain access to the gas in the subterranean zone.


The wellbore of the well 100 is typically, although not necessarily, cylindrical. All or a portion of the wellbore is lined with a tubing, such as casing 112. The casing 112 connects with a wellhead at the surface and extends downhole into the wellbore. The casing 112 operates to isolate the bore of the well 100, defined in the cased portion of the well 100 by the inner bore of the casing 112, from the surrounding Earth 108. The casing 112 can be formed of a single continuous tubing or multiple lengths of tubing joined (for example, threadedly) end-to-end. The casing 112 can be perforated in the subterranean zone of interest to allow fluid communication between the subterranean zone of interest and the bore of the casing 112. In some implementations, the casing 112 is omitted or ceases in the region of the subterranean zone of interest. This portion of the well 100 without casing is often referred to as “open hole.”


The wellhead defines an attachment point for other equipment to be attached to the well 100. For example, the well 100 can be produced with a Christmas tree attached to the wellhead. The Christmas tree can include valves used to regulate flow into or out of the well 100. The well 100 includes a downhole artificial lift system 150 residing in the wellbore, for example, at a depth that is nearer to subterranean zone than the surface. The artificial lift system 150, being of a type configured in size and robust construction for installation within a well 100, can include any type of rotating equipment that can assist production of fluids to the surface and out of the well 100 by creating an additional pressure differential within the well 100. For example, the artificial lift system 150 can include a pump, compressor, blower, or multi-phase fluid flow aid.


In particular, casing 112 is commercially produced in a number of common sizes specified by the American Petroleum Institute (the “API”), including 4½, 5, 5½, 6, 6⅝, 7, 7⅝, 7¾, 8⅝, 8¾, 9⅝, 9¾, 9⅞, 10¾, 11¾, 11⅞, 13⅜, 13½, 13⅝, 16, 18⅝, and 20 inches, and the API specifies internal diameters for each casing size. The artificial lift system 150 can be configured to fit in, and (as discussed in more detail below) in certain instances, seal to the inner diameter of one of the specified API casing sizes. Of course, the artificial lift system 150 can be made to fit in and, in certain instances, seal to other sizes of casing or tubing or otherwise seal to a wall of the well 100.


Additionally, the construction of the components of the artificial lift system 150 are configured to withstand the impacts, scraping, and other physical challenges the artificial lift system 150 will encounter while being passed hundreds of feet/meters or even multiple miles/kilometers into and out of the well 100. For example, the artificial lift system 150 can be disposed in the well 100 at a depth of up to 10,000 feet (3,048 meters). Beyond just a rugged exterior, this encompasses having certain portions of any electronics being ruggedized to be shock resistant and remain fluid tight during such physical challenges and during operation. Additionally, the artificial lift system 150 is configured to withstand and operate for extended periods of time (for example, multiple weeks, months or years) at the pressures and temperatures experienced in the well 100, which temperatures can exceed 400 degrees Fahrenheit (° F.)/205 degrees Celsius (° C.) and pressures over 2,000 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), and while submerged in the well fluids (gas, water, or oil as examples). Finally, the artificial lift system 150 can be configured to interface with one or more of the common deployment systems, such as jointed tubing (that is, lengths of tubing joined end-to-end), a sucker rod, coiled tubing (that is, not-jointed tubing, but rather a continuous, unbroken and flexible tubing formed as a single piece of material), or wireline with an electrical conductor (that is, a monofilament or multifilament wire rope with one or more electrical conductors, sometimes called e-line) and thus have a corresponding connector (for example, a jointed tubing connector, coiled tubing connector, or wireline connector).



FIG. 1 shows the artificial lift system 150 positioned in the open volume of the bore of the casing 112, and connected to a production string of tubing (also referred as production tubing 128) in the well 100. The wall of the well 100 includes the interior wall of the casing 112 in portions of the wellbore having the casing 112, and includes the open hole wellbore wall in uncased portions of the well 100.


In some implementations, the artificial lift system 150 can be implemented to alter characteristics of a wellbore by a mechanical intervention at the source. Alternatively, or in addition to any of the other implementations described in this specification, the artificial lift system 150 can be implemented as a high flow, low pressure rotary device for gas flow. Alternatively, or in addition to any of the other implementations described in this specification, the artificial lift system 150 can be implemented in a direct well-casing deployment for production through the wellbore. Other implementations of the artificial lift system 150 as a pump, compressor, or multiphase combination of these can be utilized in the well bore to effect increased well production.


The artificial lift system 150 locally alters the pressure, temperature, flow rate conditions, or a combination of these of the fluid in the well 100 proximate the artificial lift system 150. In certain instances, the alteration performed by the artificial lift system 150 can optimize or help in optimizing fluid flow through the well 100. As described previously, the artificial lift system 150 creates a pressure differential within the well 100, for example, particularly within the locale in which the artificial lift system 150 resides. In some instances, a pressure at the base of the well 100 is a low pressure, so unassisted fluid flow in the wellbore can be slow or stagnant. In these and other instances, the artificial lift system 150 introduced to the well 100 adjacent the perforations can reduce the pressure in the well 100 near the perforations to induce greater fluid flow from the subterranean zone, increase a temperature of the fluid entering the artificial lift system 150 to reduce condensation from limiting production, increase a pressure in the well 100 uphole of the artificial lift system 150 to increase fluid flow to the surface, or a combination of these.


The artificial lift system 150 moves the fluid at a first pressure downhole of the artificial lift system 150 to a second, higher pressure uphole of the artificial lift system 150. The artificial lift system 150 can operate at and maintain a pressure ratio across the artificial lift system 150 between the second, higher uphole pressure and the first, downhole pressure in the wellbore. The pressure ratio of the second pressure to the first pressure can also vary, for example, based on an operating speed of the artificial lift system 150. The artificial lift system 150 can operate in a variety of downhole conditions of the well 100. For example, the initial pressure within the well 100 can vary based on the type of well, depth of the well 100, and production flow from the perforations into the well 100.


The well 100 includes a phase separation system 160. The phase separation system 160 includes a seal 161 integrated or provided separately with a downhole system, as shown with the artificial lift system 150. The seal 161 divides the well 100 into an uphole zone 130 above the seal 161 and a downhole zone 132 below the seal 161. The seal 161 is configured to seal against the wall of the wellbore, for example, against the interior wall of the casing 112 in the cased portions of the well 100 or against the interior wall of the wellbore in the uncased, open hole portions of the well 100. In certain instances, the seal 161 can form a gas- and liquid-tight seal at the pressure differential the artificial lift system 150 creates in the well 100. For example, the seal 161 can be configured to at least partially seal against an interior wall of the wellbore to separate (completely or substantially) a pressure in the well 100 downhole of the seal 161 from a pressure in the well 100 uphole of the seal 161. Although not shown in FIG. 1, additional components, such as a surface compressor, can be used in conjunction with the artificial lift system 150 to boost pressure in the well 100. The seal 161 can be, for example, a packer. The seal 161 is configured to be disposed in a deviated portion of the well 100. In some implementations, the deviated portion of the well 100 in which the seal 161 is disposed has a deviation angle in a range of from 70 degrees (°) to 90° (horizontal).


The phase separation system 160 includes a first tubular 163, a second tubular 165, and a connector 167. The first tubular 163 extends through the seal 161. The first tubular 163 includes an inlet 163a configured to receive a wellbore fluid 190. The first tubular 163 has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than a cross-sectional flow area of the well 100 (for example, the wellbore). The wellbore fluid 190 entering the first tubular 163 via the inlet 163a accelerates due to the decreased cross-sectional flow area. The first tubular 163 includes an outlet portion 163b that is configured to induce separation of a gaseous portion 190a of the wellbore fluid 190 from a remainder of the wellbore fluid 190 (for example, a liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid and solid material 190c carried by the wellbore fluid). In some implementations, the outlet portion 163b defines perforations 163c, and the perforations 163c are configured to induce separation of the gaseous portion 190a of the wellbore fluid 190 from the remainder of the wellbore fluid 190 as the wellbore fluid 190 flows through the perforations 163c. For example, the perforations 163c can induce a “bubbling” effect that enhances separation of the gaseous portion 190a of the wellbore fluid 190 from the remainder of the wellbore fluid 190. In some implementations, the first tubular 163 includes a swirl device (not shown), such as helical vanes disposed within the outlet portion 163b of the first tubular 163, which can induce rotation in the wellbore fluid 190 flowing through the first tubular 163. The rotation of the wellbore fluid 190 induced by the swirl device can enhance phase separation via centrifugal force.


The gaseous portion 190a of the wellbore fluid 190 can then flow uphole through an annulus 130a of the uphole zone 130 between the inner wall of the well 100 (for example, the casing 112) and the first tubular 163. In some implementations, as shown in FIG. 1, the outlet portion 163b has a deviation angle that is less than a deviation angle of an inlet portion of the first tubular 163 near the inlet 163a. In some implementations, the inlet portion of the first tubular 163 near the inlet 163a has a deviation angle in a range of from 70° to 90° (horizontal). In some implementations, the inlet portion of the first tubular 163 near the inlet 163a has a deviation angle that is the same as the deviation angle of the deviated portion of the well 100 in which the seal 161 is disposed. In some implementations, the outlet portion 163b of the first tubular 163 has a deviation angle in a range of from 0° (vertical) to 30°. In some implementations, as shown in FIG. 1, the first tubular 163 extends past the seal 161, such that the inlet 163a of the first tubular 163 is positioned downhole in comparison to the seal 161.


The second tubular 165 includes an inlet 165a configured to receive at least a liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid 190. The second tubular 165 includes an outlet 165b configured to discharge the liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid 190. The liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid 190 discharged by the outlet 165b of the second tubular 165 flows to the artificial lift system 150 to be produced to the surface. In some implementations, the second tubular 165 has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than the cross-sectional flow area of the first tubular 163. Decreasing the cross-sectional flow areas of the first tubular 163 and the second tubular 165 directly increases the cross-sectional flow area of the annulus 130a of the uphole zone 130, which can facilitate the separation of phases (gas from liquid and solid from liquid) of the wellbore fluid 190. In some implementations, the inlet 165a of the second tubular 165 includes a screen (not shown) that is configured to prevent solid material of a certain size from flowing through the screen and into the second tubular 165 via the inlet 165a. The screen can be sized to prevent sand or other particulate matter that is expected to be produced with the production fluid (for example, identified from production data obtained for the well 100) from flowing through the screen and into the second tubular 165 via the inlet 165a.


The connector 167 is coupled to the first tubular 163 and the second tubular 165. The connector 167 is coupled to the outlet portion 163b of the first tubular 163, such that the connector 167 is configured to prevent flow of the wellbore fluid 190 from the first tubular 163 through the connector 167. That is, any fluid that flows into the first tubular 163 via the inlet 163a flows out of the first tubular 163 through the perforations 163c of the outlet portion 163b instead of flowing through the connector 167. The connector 167 is configured to fluidically connect the second tubular 165 to the artificial lift system 150, which is disposed uphole of the connector 167.


A sump 169 of the phase separation system 160 is defined by a region of the annulus 130a of the uphole zone 130 between the inner wall of the well 100 (for example, the casing 112) and the first tubular 163, downhole of the inlet 165a of the second tubular 165 and uphole of the seal 161. The sump 169 can accumulate the solid material 190c carried by the wellbore fluid 190. For example, the solid material 190c carried by the wellbore fluid 190 can flow into the first tubular 163 via the inlet 163a, out of the first tubular 163 via the outlet portion 163b, and settle in the sump 169 due to gravity. The perforations 163c of the outlet portion 163b of the first tubular 163 can be sized, such that the solid material 190c can pass through the perforations 163c without getting lodged/stuck in the perforations 163c. The perforations 163c can be sized to allow sand or other particulate matter (for example, identified from production data obtained for the well 100) to pass through the perforations 163c without getting lodged/stuck in the perforations 163c, so that the sand or other particulate matter can be discharged to the annulus 130a of the uphole zone 130 between the inner wall of the well 100 (for example, the casing 112) and the first tubular 163 and subsequently settle in the sump 169. The perforations 163c of the outlet portion 163b of the first tubular 163 can have any shape, for example, circular or any other geometric shape.



FIG. 2 depicts an example phase separation system 260 implemented in the well 100. The phase separation system 260 can be substantially similar to the phase separation system 160 shown in FIG. 1. For example, the phase separation system 260 includes a seal 261, and the seal 261 can be substantially the same as the seal 161 of the phase separation system 160 shown in FIG. 1. The seal 261 can be, for example, a packer. The seal 261 is configured to be disposed in a deviated portion of the well 100. In some implementations, the deviated portion of the well 100 in which the seal 261 is disposed has a deviation angle in a range of from 70° to 90° (horizontal).


The phase separation system 260 includes a first tubular 263 and a second tubular 265. The first tubular 263 can be substantially similar to the first tubular 163 of the phase separation system 160 shown in FIG. 1. The first tubular 263 extends through the seal 261. The first tubular 263 includes an inlet 263a configured to receive a wellbore fluid 190. The first tubular 263 has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than a cross-sectional flow area of the well 100 (for example, the wellbore). The wellbore fluid 190 entering the first tubular 263 via the inlet 263a accelerates due to the decreased cross-sectional flow area. The first tubular 263 includes an outlet 263b that is configured to discharge the wellbore fluid 190 into the annulus 230a of the uphole zone 230 within the well 100. In some implementations, the first tubular 263 defines perforations (similar to the outlet portion 163b of the first tubular 163), and the perforations are configured to induce separation of the gaseous portion 190a of the wellbore fluid 190 from the remainder of the wellbore fluid 190 as the wellbore fluid 190 flows through the perforations. In some implementations, the first tubular 263 includes a swirl device (not shown), such as helical vanes disposed within the first tubular 263, which can induce rotation in the wellbore fluid 190 flowing through the first tubular 263. The rotation of the wellbore fluid 190 induced by the swirl device can enhance phase separation via centrifugal force.


The gaseous portion 190a of the wellbore fluid 190 can then flow uphole through the annulus 230a of the uphole zone 230 between the inner wall of the well 100 (for example, the casing 112) and the first tubular 263. In some implementations, as shown in FIG. 2, an outlet portion of the first tubular 263 near the outlet 263b has a deviation angle that is less than a deviation angle of an inlet portion of the first tubular 263 near the inlet 263a. In some implementations, the inlet portion of the first tubular 263 near the inlet 263a has a deviation angle in a range of from 70° to 90° (horizontal). In some implementations, the inlet portion of the first tubular 263 near the inlet 263a has a deviation angle that is the same as the deviation angle of the deviated portion of the well 100 in which the seal 261 is disposed. In some implementations, the outlet portion of the first tubular 263 has a deviation angle in a range of from 0° (vertical) to 30°. In some implementations, as shown in FIG. 2, the first tubular 263 extends past the seal 261, such that the inlet 263a of the first tubular 263 is positioned downhole in comparison to the seal 261.


The second tubular 265 can be substantially similar to the second tubular 165 of the phase separation system 160 shown in FIG. 1. The second tubular 265 includes an inlet 265a configured to receive at least a liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid 190. The second tubular 265 includes an outlet 265b configured to discharge the liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid 190. The liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid 190 discharged by the outlet 265b of the second tubular 265 flows to the artificial lift system 150 to be produced to the surface. In some implementations, the second tubular 265 has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than the cross-sectional flow area of the first tubular 263. Decreasing the cross-sectional flow areas of the first tubular 263 and the second tubular 265 directly increases the cross-sectional flow area of the annulus 230a of the uphole zone 230, which can facilitate the separation of phases (gas from liquid and solid from liquid) of the wellbore fluid 190. In some implementations, the inlet 265a of the second tubular 265 includes a screen (not shown) that is configured to prevent solid material of a certain size from flowing through the screen and into the second tubular 265 via the inlet 265a. The screen can be sized to prevent sand or other particulate matter that is expected to be produced with the production fluid (for example, identified from production data obtained for the well 100) from flowing through the screen and into the second tubular 265 via the inlet 265a.


The second tubular 265 is coupled to the first tubular 263. The first tubular 263 and the second tubular 265 share a common wall 267 that defines a divided section 268. The outlet 263b of the first tubular 263 is disposed at an uphole end of the divided section 268. The inlet 265a of the second tubular 265 is disposed at a downhole end of the divided section 268. Thus, the divided section 268 ensures that fluid flowing from the first tubular 263 to the second tubular 265 (for example, the liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid 190) flows out of the first tubular 263 via the outlet 263b and into the annulus 230a before entering the second tubular 265 via the inlet 265a.


A sump 269 of the phase separation system 260 is defined by a region of the annulus 230a of the uphole zone 230 between the inner wall of the well 100 (for example, the casing 112) and the first tubular 263, downhole of the inlet 265a of the second tubular 265 and uphole of the seal 261. The sump 269 can be substantially similar to the sump 169 of the phase separation system 160 shown in FIG. 1. The sump 269 can accumulate the solid material 190c carried by the wellbore fluid 190. For example, the solid material 190c carried by the wellbore fluid 190 can flow into the first tubular 263 via the inlet 263a, out of the first tubular 263 via the outlet 263b, and settle in the sump 269 due to gravity. In implementations where the first tubular 263 defines perforations, the perforations can be sized, such that the solid material 190c can pass through the perforations without getting lodged/stuck in the perforations.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart of an example method 300 for downhole phase separation in a well, such as the well 100. Either of the phase separation systems 160 or 260 can implement the method 300. At block 302, an inner wall of the well 100 (for example, the casing 112) is sealed by a seal (such as the seal 161 or 261) that is disposed in a deviated portion of the well 100.


At block 304, a wellbore fluid (such as the wellbore fluid 190) is received by a first tubular (such as the first tubular 163 or 263) via an inlet (such as the inlet 163a or 263a, respectively) of the first tubular 163, 263.


At block 306, the wellbore fluid 190 is discharged by an outlet (such as the outlet portion 163b or outlet 263b) of the first tubular 163, 263 into an annulus (such as the annulus 130a or 230a) within the well 100, uphole of the seal 161, 261. When the method 300 is implemented by the phase separation system 160, the connector 167 prevents the wellbore fluid 190 from flowing from the first tubular 163 and through the connector 167. Instead, any fluid that flows into the first tubular 163 via the inlet 163a flows out of the first tubular 163, for example, through the perforations 163c of the outlet portion 163b. The perforations 163c induce separation of the gaseous portion (such as the gaseous portion 190a) of the wellbore fluid 190 from a remainder of the wellbore fluid 190 (for example, the liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid and the solid material 190c carried by the wellbore fluid), as the wellbore fluid 190 flows out of the first tubular 163 through the perforations 163c.


At block 308, at least a liquid portion (such as the liquid portion 190b) of the wellbore fluid 190 is received by a second tubular (such as the second tubular 165 or 265) via an inlet (such as the inlet 165a or 265a, respectively) of the second tubular 165, 265. In some implementations, the inlet 165a, 265a can prevent solid material of a certain size from flowing into the second tubular 165, 265, for example, using a screen. For example, the screen can prevent sand or other particulate matter that is expected to be produced with the production fluid (for example, identified from production data obtained for the well 100) from flowing through the screen and into the second tubular 165, 265 via the inlet 165a, 265a.


At block 310, the liquid portion 190b of the wellbore fluid 190 is directed by the second tubular 165, 265 to a downhole artificial lift system (such as the artificial lift system 150) disposed within the well 100. When the method 300 is implemented by the phase separation system 160, the connector 167 fluidically connects the second tubular 165 to the artificial lift system 150.


At block 312, at least a portion of solid material carried by the wellbore fluid 190 (such as the solid material 190c) is received by a sump (such as the sump 169 or 269).


While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular implementations. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented, in combination, in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations, separately, or in any sub-combination. Moreover, although previously described features may be described as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.


As used in this disclosure, the terms “a,” “an,” or “the” are used to include one or more than one unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive “or” unless otherwise indicated. The statement “at least one of A and B” has the same meaning as “A, B, or A and B.” In addition, it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed in this disclosure, and not otherwise defined, is for the purpose of description only and not of limitation. Any use of section headings is intended to aid reading of the document and is not to be interpreted as limiting; information that is relevant to a section heading may occur within or outside of that particular section.


As used in this disclosure, the term “about” or “approximately” can allow for a degree of variability in a value or range, for example, within 10%, within 5%, or within 1% of a stated value or of a stated limit of a range.


As used in this disclosure, the term “substantially” refers to a majority of, or mostly, as in at least about 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, 99.99%, or at least about 99.999% or more.


As used in this disclosure, the term “deviation angle” is the angle at which a longitudinal axis of a wellbore (or portion of a wellbore that is of interest) diverges from vertical. A deviation angle of 0° or 180° means that the longitudinal axis of the wellbore (or portion of the wellbore that is of interest) is vertical. A deviation angle of 90° means that the longitudinal axis of the wellbore (or portion of the wellbore that is of interest) is horizontal.


Values expressed in a range format should be interpreted in a flexible manner to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. For example, a range of “0.1% to about 5%” or “0.1% to 5%” should be interpreted to include about 0.1% to about 5%, as well as the individual values (for example, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) and the sub-ranges (for example, 0.1% to 0.5%, 1.1% to 2.2%, 3.3% to 4.4%) within the indicated range. The statement “X to Y” has the same meaning as “about X to about Y,” unless indicated otherwise. Likewise, the statement “X, Y, or Z” has the same meaning as “about X, about Y, or about Z,” unless indicated otherwise.


Particular implementations of the subject matter have been described. Other implementations, alterations, and permutations of the described implementations are within the scope of the following claims as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. While operations are depicted in the drawings or claims in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed (some operations may be considered optional), to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking or parallel processing (or a combination of multitasking and parallel processing) may be advantageous and performed as deemed appropriate.


Moreover, the separation or integration of various system modules and components in the previously described implementations should not be understood as requiring such separation or integration in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described components and systems can generally be integrated together or packaged into multiple products.


Accordingly, the previously described example implementations do not define or constrain the present disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A system comprising: a packer configured to be disposed in a deviated portion of a well formed in a subterranean formation, the packer configured to form a seal with an inner wall of the well;a first tubular extending through the packer and having a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than a cross-sectional flow area of the well, the first tubular comprising: a first inlet configured to receive a wellbore fluid; anda first outlet portion comprising a first outlet and perforations formed on a side wall of the first tubular adjacent the first outlet, the perforations configured to induce separation of a gaseous portion of the wellbore fluid from a remainder of the wellbore fluid, such that the gaseous portion flows uphole through an annulus between the inner wall of the well and the first tubular;a second tubular comprising: a second inlet configured to receive at least a liquid portion of the remainder of the wellbore fluid; anda second outlet configured to discharge the liquid portion of the remainder of the wellbore fluid; anda connector coupled to the first tubular and the second tubular, wherein: the connector is coupled to the first outlet portion of the first tubular, such that the connector is configured to prevent flow of the wellbore fluid from the first tubular through the connector and such that any fluid that flows into the first tubular via the first inlet flows out of the first tubular through the perforations of the outlet portion,the connector is configured to fluidically connect the second tubular to a downhole artificial lift system disposed within the well, uphole of the connector, anda sump for accumulation of solid material from the wellbore fluid is defined by a region of the annulus between the inner wall of the well and the first tubular, downhole of the second inlet of the second tubular and uphole of the packer.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, comprising the well, wherein the packer is disposed in the deviated portion of the well that has a deviation angle in a range of from 70 degrees)(° to 90° (horizontal).
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the first tubular comprises: a first portion near the first inlet, the first portion having a first deviation angle; andthe first outlet portion has a second deviation angle less than the first deviation angle.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the second tubular has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than the cross-sectional flow area of the first tubular.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the first tubular extends past the packer, and the first inlet is positioned downhole in comparison to the packer.
  • 6. A method comprising: sealing, by a packer disposed in a deviated portion of a well formed in a subterranean formation, with an inner wall of the well;receiving, by a first tubular extending through the packer and having a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than a cross-sectional flow area of the well, a wellbore fluid via a first inlet of the first tubular, the first tubular comprising an outlet portion comprising a first outlet and perforations formed on a side wall of the first tubular adjacent the first outlet, the wellbore fluid comprising a gaseous portion and a liquid portion;enhancing, by the perforations, a separation of the gaseous portion from the liquid portion of the wellbore fluid;discharging, by the first tubular and through the perforations, the separated gaseous portion and liquid portion of the wellbore fluid into an annulus within the well, uphole of the packer, wherein the separated gaseous portion rises through the annulus in an uphole direction and the liquid portion falls in the annulus in the downhole direction;preventing, by a connector coupled to the first outlet of the first tubular, flow of the wellbore fluid through the first outlet;receiving, by a second tubular coupled to the first tubular, the liquid portion of the wellbore fluid via a second inlet of the second tubular, the second tubular fluidically connected to the connector;directing, by the second tubular, the liquid portion of the wellbore fluid to a downhole artificial lift system disposed within the well; andreceiving, by a sump defined by a region of an annulus between the inner wall of the well and the first tubular, downhole of the second inlet of the second tubular and uphole of the packer, at least a portion of solid material carried by the wellbore fluid.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the deviated portion of the well in which the packer is disposed has a deviation angle in a range of from 70 degrees)(° to 90° (horizontal).
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the first tubular comprises: a first portion near the first inlet, the first portion having a first deviation angle; anda second portion near the first outlet, the second portion having a second deviation angle less than the first deviation angle.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the second tubular has a cross-sectional flow area that is smaller than the cross-sectional flow area of the first tubular.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the first tubular extends past the packer, and the first inlet is positioned downhole in comparison to the packer.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein: the first tubular and the second tubular share a common wall that defines a divided section;the first outlet of the first tubular is disposed at an uphole end of the divided section; andthe second inlet of the second tubular is disposed at a downhole end of the divided section, such that fluid flowing from the first tubular to the second tubular flows into the annulus before entering the second tubular.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, comprising fluidically connecting, by the connector, the second tubular to the downhole artificial lift system.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein: the first tubular comprises a plurality of outlets;the first outlet is one of the plurality of outlets; andthe method comprises inducing, by the plurality of outlets, separation of a gaseous portion of the wellbore fluid from a remainder of the wellbore fluid as the wellbore fluid flows out of the first tubular through the plurality of outlets.
US Referenced Citations (586)
Number Name Date Kind
335164 Vitalis Feb 1886 A
646887 Stowe et al. Apr 1900 A
1485504 Hollander Mar 1924 A
1559155 Bullock Oct 1925 A
1674815 Barnhart Jun 1928 A
1912452 Hollander Jun 1933 A
1941442 Moran et al. Dec 1933 A
1978277 Noble Oct 1934 A
2204857 Aladar Jun 1940 A
2216315 Aladar Oct 1940 A
2287027 Cummins Jun 1942 A
2407987 Landberg Sep 1946 A
2556435 Moehrl Jun 1951 A
2625110 Haentjens et al. Jan 1953 A
2641191 Alfred Jun 1953 A
2643723 Lynes Jun 1953 A
2782720 Dochterman Feb 1957 A
2845869 Herbenar Aug 1958 A
2866417 Otto Dec 1958 A
2931384 Clark Apr 1960 A
3007418 Brundage et al. Nov 1961 A
3022739 Herrick et al. Feb 1962 A
3034484 Stefancin May 1962 A
3038698 Troyer Jun 1962 A
3075743 Sheets Jan 1963 A
3123010 Witt et al. Mar 1964 A
3126755 Luck Mar 1964 A
3129875 Cirillo Apr 1964 A
3132595 Bower May 1964 A
3139835 Wilkinson Jul 1964 A
3171355 Harris et al. Mar 1965 A
3175403 Nelson Mar 1965 A
3175618 Lang et al. Mar 1965 A
3213797 McMahan Oct 1965 A
3229642 Lobanoff Jan 1966 A
3251226 Cushing May 1966 A
3272130 Mosbacher Sep 1966 A
3413925 Campolong Dec 1968 A
3433163 Brancart Mar 1969 A
3448305 Raynal et al. Jun 1969 A
3462082 Everett Aug 1969 A
3516765 Boyadjieff Jun 1970 A
3558936 Horan Jan 1971 A
3638732 Huntsinger et al. Feb 1972 A
3663845 Apstein May 1972 A
3680989 Brundage Aug 1972 A
3724503 Cooke Apr 1973 A
3771910 Laing Nov 1973 A
3795145 Miller Mar 1974 A
3839914 Modisette et al. Oct 1974 A
3874812 Hanagarth Apr 1975 A
3906792 Miller Sep 1975 A
3918520 Hutchison Nov 1975 A
3961758 Morgan Jun 1976 A
3970877 Russell et al. Jul 1976 A
3975117 Carter Aug 1976 A
3981626 Onal Sep 1976 A
4025244 Sato May 1977 A
4096211 Rameau Jun 1978 A
4127364 Eiermann Nov 1978 A
4139330 Neal Feb 1979 A
4154302 Cugini May 1979 A
4181175 McGee et al. Jan 1980 A
4226275 Frosch Oct 1980 A
4266607 Halstead May 1981 A
4289199 McGee Sep 1981 A
4336415 Walling Jun 1982 A
4374530 Walling Feb 1983 A
4387318 Kolm et al. Jun 1983 A
4387685 Abbey Jun 1983 A
4417474 Elderton Nov 1983 A
4425965 Bayh, III et al. Jan 1984 A
4440221 Taylor et al. Apr 1984 A
4476923 Walling Oct 1984 A
4491176 Reed Jan 1985 A
4497185 Shaw Feb 1985 A
4536674 Schmidt Aug 1985 A
4576043 Nguyen Mar 1986 A
4580634 Cruise Apr 1986 A
4582131 Plummer et al. Apr 1986 A
4586854 Newman et al. May 1986 A
4619323 Gidley Oct 1986 A
4627489 Reed Dec 1986 A
4632187 Bayh, III et al. Dec 1986 A
4658583 Shropshire Apr 1987 A
4662437 Renfro May 1987 A
4665981 Hayatdavoudi May 1987 A
4676308 Chow Jun 1987 A
4685523 Paschal, Jr. et al. Aug 1987 A
4741668 Bearden et al. May 1988 A
4757709 Czernichow Jul 1988 A
RE32866 Cruise Feb 1989 E
4838758 Sheth Jun 1989 A
4850812 Voight Jul 1989 A
4856344 Hunt Aug 1989 A
4867633 Gravelle Sep 1989 A
4969364 Masuda Nov 1990 A
4986739 Child Jan 1991 A
5033937 Wilson Jul 1991 A
5094294 Bayh, III et al. Mar 1992 A
5113379 Scherbatskoy May 1992 A
5150619 Turner Sep 1992 A
5158440 Cooper et al. Oct 1992 A
5169286 Yamada Dec 1992 A
5180014 Cox Jan 1993 A
5195882 Freeman Mar 1993 A
5201848 Powers Apr 1993 A
5209650 Lemieux May 1993 A
5224182 Murphy et al. Jun 1993 A
5240073 Bustamante Aug 1993 A
5246336 Furukawa Sep 1993 A
5261796 Niemiec et al. Nov 1993 A
5269377 Martin Dec 1993 A
5285008 Sas-Jaworsky et al. Feb 1994 A
5301760 Graham Apr 1994 A
5317223 Kiesewetter et al. May 1994 A
5319272 Raad Jun 1994 A
5323661 Cheng Jun 1994 A
5334801 Mohn Aug 1994 A
5335542 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 1994 A
5337603 McFarland et al. Aug 1994 A
5358378 Holscher Oct 1994 A
5375622 Houston Dec 1994 A
5482117 Kolpak Jan 1996 A
5494413 Campen et al. Feb 1996 A
5591922 Segeral et al. Jan 1997 A
5605193 Bearden et al. Feb 1997 A
5613311 Burtch Mar 1997 A
5613555 Sorem et al. Mar 1997 A
5620048 Beauquin Apr 1997 A
5641915 Ortiz Jun 1997 A
5649811 Krol, Jr. et al. Jul 1997 A
5653585 Fresco et al. Aug 1997 A
5693891 Brown Dec 1997 A
5708500 Anderson Jan 1998 A
5736650 Hiron et al. Apr 1998 A
5755288 Bearden et al. May 1998 A
5834659 Ortiz Nov 1998 A
5845709 Mack et al. Dec 1998 A
5848642 Sola Dec 1998 A
5880378 Behring Mar 1999 A
5886267 Ortiz et al. Mar 1999 A
5892860 Maron et al. Apr 1999 A
5905208 Ortiz et al. May 1999 A
5908049 Williams et al. Jun 1999 A
5921285 Quigley et al. Jul 1999 A
5939813 Schob Aug 1999 A
5954305 Calabro Sep 1999 A
5965964 Skinner et al. Oct 1999 A
5975205 Carisella Nov 1999 A
6044906 Saltel Apr 2000 A
6068015 Pringle May 2000 A
6082455 Pringle et al. Jul 2000 A
6113675 Branstetter Sep 2000 A
6129507 Ganelin Oct 2000 A
6148866 Quigley et al. Nov 2000 A
6155102 Toma Dec 2000 A
6164308 Butler Dec 2000 A
6167965 Bearden et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176323 Weirich Jan 2001 B1
6179269 Kobylinski et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192983 Neuroth et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193079 Weimer Feb 2001 B1
6209652 Portman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6257332 Vidrine et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264440 Klein et al. Jul 2001 B1
6286558 Quigley et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289990 Dillon et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298917 Kobylinski et al. Oct 2001 B1
6325143 Scarsdale Dec 2001 B1
6357485 Quigley et al. Mar 2002 B2
6357530 Kennedy Mar 2002 B1
6361272 Bassett Mar 2002 B1
6413065 Dass Jul 2002 B1
6414239 Gasque, Jr. Jul 2002 B1
6427778 Beall et al. Aug 2002 B1
6454010 Thomas et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463810 Liu Oct 2002 B1
6504258 Schultz et al. Jan 2003 B2
6530211 Holtzapple et al. Mar 2003 B2
6544013 Kato et al. Apr 2003 B2
6546812 Lewis Apr 2003 B2
6547519 deBlanc et al. Apr 2003 B2
6550327 Van Berk Apr 2003 B1
6557642 Head May 2003 B2
6578638 Guillory et al. Jun 2003 B2
6588266 Tubel et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601460 Materna Aug 2003 B1
6601651 Grant Aug 2003 B2
6604550 Quigley et al. Aug 2003 B2
6629564 Ramakrishnan et al. Oct 2003 B1
6679692 Feuling et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681894 Fanguy Jan 2004 B1
6726449 James et al. Apr 2004 B2
6728165 Roscigno et al. Apr 2004 B1
6733249 Maier et al. May 2004 B2
6741000 Newcomb May 2004 B2
6755609 Preinfalk Jun 2004 B2
6768214 Schultz et al. Jul 2004 B2
6776054 Stephenson Aug 2004 B1
6779601 Wilson Aug 2004 B2
6807857 Storm, Jr. Oct 2004 B2
6808371 Niwatsukino et al. Oct 2004 B2
6811382 Buchanan et al. Nov 2004 B2
6848539 Lee et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856132 Appel et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857452 Quigley et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857920 Marathe et al. Feb 2005 B2
6863137 Terry et al. Mar 2005 B2
6913079 Tubel Jul 2005 B2
6920085 Finke et al. Jul 2005 B2
6932160 Murray et al. Aug 2005 B2
6935189 Richards Aug 2005 B2
6973972 Aronstam Dec 2005 B2
6993979 Segeral Feb 2006 B2
7017681 Ivannikov et al. Mar 2006 B2
7021905 Torrey et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032662 Malone et al. Apr 2006 B2
7086294 DeLong Aug 2006 B2
7093665 Dass Aug 2006 B2
7104321 Carruth Sep 2006 B2
7107860 Jones Sep 2006 B2
7199480 Fripp et al. Apr 2007 B2
7224077 Allen May 2007 B2
7226279 Andoskin et al. Jun 2007 B2
7242103 Tips Jul 2007 B2
7249805 Cap Jul 2007 B2
7259688 Hirsch et al. Aug 2007 B2
7262532 Seidler et al. Aug 2007 B2
7275592 Davis Oct 2007 B2
7275711 Flanigan Oct 2007 B1
7338262 Gozdawa Mar 2008 B2
7345372 Roberts et al. Mar 2008 B2
7377312 Davis May 2008 B2
7410003 Ravensbergen et al. Aug 2008 B2
7647948 Quigley et al. Jan 2010 B2
7668411 Davies et al. Feb 2010 B2
7670122 Phillips et al. Mar 2010 B2
7670451 Head Mar 2010 B2
7699099 Bolding et al. Apr 2010 B2
7730937 Head Jun 2010 B2
7762715 Gordon et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770650 Young et al. Aug 2010 B2
7775763 Johnson et al. Aug 2010 B1
7819640 Kalavsky et al. Oct 2010 B2
7841395 Gay et al. Nov 2010 B2
7841826 Phillips Nov 2010 B1
7847421 Gardner et al. Dec 2010 B2
7849928 Collie Dec 2010 B2
7905295 Mack Mar 2011 B2
7906861 Guerrero et al. Mar 2011 B2
7946341 Hartog et al. May 2011 B2
8013660 Fitzi Sep 2011 B2
8016545 Oklejas et al. Sep 2011 B2
8047232 Bernitsas Nov 2011 B2
8066033 Quigley et al. Nov 2011 B2
8067865 Savant Nov 2011 B2
8141625 Reid Mar 2012 B2
8197602 Baron Jun 2012 B2
8235126 Bradley Aug 2012 B2
8258644 Kaplan Sep 2012 B2
8261841 Bailey et al. Sep 2012 B2
8302736 Olivier Nov 2012 B1
8337142 Eslinger et al. Dec 2012 B2
8408064 Hartog et al. Apr 2013 B2
8419398 Kothnur et al. Apr 2013 B2
8421251 Pabon et al. Apr 2013 B2
8426988 Hay Apr 2013 B2
8493556 Li et al. Jul 2013 B2
8506257 Bottome Aug 2013 B2
8564179 Ochoa et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568081 Song et al. Oct 2013 B2
8579617 Ono et al. Nov 2013 B2
8604634 Pabon et al. Dec 2013 B2
8638002 Lu Jan 2014 B2
8648480 Liu et al. Feb 2014 B1
8771499 McCutchen et al. Jul 2014 B2
8786113 Tinnen et al. Jul 2014 B2
8821138 Holtzapple et al. Sep 2014 B2
8905728 Blankemeier et al. Dec 2014 B2
8916983 Marya et al. Dec 2014 B2
8925649 Wiebe et al. Jan 2015 B1
8936430 Bassett Jan 2015 B2
8948550 Li et al. Feb 2015 B2
8950476 Head Feb 2015 B2
8960309 Davis Feb 2015 B2
8973433 Mulford Mar 2015 B2
9022106 McCoy May 2015 B1
9080336 Yantis Jul 2015 B1
9091144 Swanson et al. Jul 2015 B2
9106159 Wiebe et al. Aug 2015 B1
9109429 Xu et al. Aug 2015 B2
9130161 Nair et al. Sep 2015 B2
9133709 Huh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9140815 Lopez et al. Sep 2015 B2
9157297 Williamson, Jr. Oct 2015 B2
9170149 Hartog et al. Oct 2015 B2
9200932 Sittler Dec 2015 B2
9203277 Kori et al. Dec 2015 B2
9234529 Meuter Jan 2016 B2
9239043 Zeas Jan 2016 B1
9321222 Childers et al. Apr 2016 B2
9322389 Tosi Apr 2016 B2
9353614 Roth et al. May 2016 B2
9383476 Trehan Jul 2016 B2
9499460 Kawamura et al. Nov 2016 B2
9500073 Alan et al. Nov 2016 B2
9518458 Ellithorp Dec 2016 B2
9540908 Olivier Jan 2017 B1
9574438 Flores Feb 2017 B2
9581489 Skinner Feb 2017 B2
9587456 Roth Mar 2017 B2
9593561 Xiao et al. Mar 2017 B2
9599460 Wang et al. Mar 2017 B2
9599505 Lagakos et al. Mar 2017 B2
9617847 Jaaskelainen et al. Apr 2017 B2
9631482 Roth et al. Apr 2017 B2
9677560 Davis et al. Jun 2017 B1
9757796 Sherman et al. Sep 2017 B2
9759025 Vavik Sep 2017 B2
9759041 Osborne Sep 2017 B2
9784077 Gorrara Oct 2017 B2
9880096 Bond et al. Jan 2018 B2
9903010 Doud et al. Feb 2018 B2
9915134 Xiao et al. Mar 2018 B2
9932806 Stewart Apr 2018 B2
9951598 Roth et al. Apr 2018 B2
9964533 Ahmad May 2018 B2
9976381 Martin et al. May 2018 B2
9982519 Melo May 2018 B2
10100596 Roth et al. Oct 2018 B2
10115942 Qiao et al. Oct 2018 B2
10138885 Ejim et al. Nov 2018 B2
10151194 Roth et al. Dec 2018 B2
10209383 Barfoot et al. Feb 2019 B2
10253610 Roth et al. Apr 2019 B2
10273399 Cox et al. Apr 2019 B2
10280727 Saponja May 2019 B2
10287853 Ejim et al. May 2019 B2
10308865 Cox et al. Jun 2019 B2
10323644 Shakirov et al. Jun 2019 B1
10337302 Roth et al. Jul 2019 B2
10337312 Xiao et al. Jul 2019 B2
10352125 Frazier Jul 2019 B2
10367434 Ahmad Jul 2019 B2
10378322 Ejim et al. Aug 2019 B2
10465477 Abdelaziz et al. Nov 2019 B2
10465484 Turner et al. Nov 2019 B2
10487259 Cox et al. Nov 2019 B2
10501682 Cox et al. Dec 2019 B2
10533558 Melo et al. Jan 2020 B2
10578111 Xiao et al. Mar 2020 B2
10584702 Melo Mar 2020 B2
10590751 Saponja et al. Mar 2020 B2
10677031 Xiao Jun 2020 B2
10731441 Xiao Aug 2020 B2
10844701 Xiao et al. Nov 2020 B2
10851596 Roth et al. Dec 2020 B2
10900315 Xiao Jan 2021 B2
10941778 Xiao et al. Mar 2021 B2
11028682 Zhang Jun 2021 B1
11095191 Wrighton Aug 2021 B2
11162340 Xiao Nov 2021 B2
11162493 Melo et al. Nov 2021 B2
11220890 Xiao Jan 2022 B2
20010036334 Choa Nov 2001 A1
20020043404 Trueman et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020074742 Quoiani Jun 2002 A1
20020079100 Simpson Jun 2002 A1
20020109080 Tubel et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020121376 Rivas Sep 2002 A1
20020153141 Hartman Oct 2002 A1
20030079880 Deaton et al. May 2003 A1
20030141071 Hosie Jul 2003 A1
20030161739 Chu et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030185676 James Oct 2003 A1
20030226395 Storm et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040013547 Allen Jan 2004 A1
20040060705 Kelley Apr 2004 A1
20050047779 Jaynes et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050098349 Krueger et al. May 2005 A1
20050166961 Means Aug 2005 A1
20050200210 Kotsonis et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050217859 Hartman Oct 2005 A1
20050254943 Fukuchi et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060066169 Daugherty et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060076956 Sjolie et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060086498 Wetzel et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060096760 Ohmer May 2006 A1
20070012437 Clingman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070181304 Rankin et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070193749 Folk Aug 2007 A1
20070212238 Jacobsen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220987 Clifton et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080048455 Carney Feb 2008 A1
20080093084 Knight Apr 2008 A1
20080100828 Cyr et al. May 2008 A1
20080187434 Neiszer Aug 2008 A1
20080236842 Bhavsar et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262737 Thigpen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080264182 Jones Oct 2008 A1
20080277941 Bowles Nov 2008 A1
20080290876 Ameen Nov 2008 A1
20080292454 Brunner Nov 2008 A1
20090001304 Hansen et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090016899 Davis Jan 2009 A1
20090090513 Bissonnette Apr 2009 A1
20090110579 Amburgey Apr 2009 A1
20090151928 Lawson Jun 2009 A1
20090151953 Brown Jun 2009 A1
20090166045 Wetzel et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090255669 Ayan et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090304322 Davies et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090289627 Johansen et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090293634 Ong Dec 2009 A1
20100040492 Eslinger et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100122818 Rooks May 2010 A1
20100164231 Tsou Jul 2010 A1
20100186439 Ogata et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100206577 Martinez Aug 2010 A1
20100236794 Duan Sep 2010 A1
20100244404 Bradley Sep 2010 A1
20100258306 Camilleri Oct 2010 A1
20100288493 Fielder et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100300413 Ulrey et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100308592 Frayne Dec 2010 A1
20110017459 Dinkins Jan 2011 A1
20110024107 Sunyovszky et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110024231 Wurth et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110036568 Barbosa Feb 2011 A1
20110036662 Smith Feb 2011 A1
20110049901 Tinnen Mar 2011 A1
20110088462 Samson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110155390 Lannom et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110162832 Reid Jul 2011 A1
20110169353 Endo Jul 2011 A1
20110185805 Roux et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110203848 Krueger et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110273032 Lu Nov 2011 A1
20110278094 Gute Nov 2011 A1
20110296911 Moore Dec 2011 A1
20110300008 Fielder et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120012327 Plunkett et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120018143 Lembcke Jan 2012 A1
20120018148 Bryant et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120211245 Fuhst et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120282119 Floyd Nov 2012 A1
20120292915 Moon Nov 2012 A1
20130019673 Sroka Jan 2013 A1
20130300833 Perkins Jan 2013 A1
20130048302 Gokdag et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130051977 Song Feb 2013 A1
20130066139 Wiessler Mar 2013 A1
20130068454 Armistead Mar 2013 A1
20130068481 Zhou Mar 2013 A1
20130073208 Dorovsky Mar 2013 A1
20130081460 Xiao et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130091942 Samson et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130119669 Murphree May 2013 A1
20130119830 Hautz May 2013 A1
20130136639 Simpson May 2013 A1
20130167628 Hull et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130175030 Ige Jul 2013 A1
20130189123 Stokley Jul 2013 A1
20130200628 Kane Aug 2013 A1
20130213663 Lau et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130227940 Greenblatt Sep 2013 A1
20130248429 Dahule Sep 2013 A1
20130255370 Roux et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130259721 Noui-Mehidi Oct 2013 A1
20140012507 Trehan Jan 2014 A1
20140014331 Crocker Jan 2014 A1
20140027546 Kean et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140037422 Gilarranz Feb 2014 A1
20140041862 Ersoz Feb 2014 A1
20140116720 He et al. May 2014 A1
20140144706 Bailey et al. May 2014 A1
20140167418 Hiejima Jun 2014 A1
20140175800 Thorp Jun 2014 A1
20140208855 Skinner Jul 2014 A1
20140209291 Watson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140265337 Harding et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140265654 Satterfield Sep 2014 A1
20140284937 Dudley et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140311737 Bedouet et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140341714 Casa Nov 2014 A1
20140343857 Pfutzner Nov 2014 A1
20140369879 Friedman Dec 2014 A1
20140377080 Xiao et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150034580 Nakao et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150068769 Xiao et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150071795 Vazquez et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150075772 Saponja Mar 2015 A1
20150114127 Barfoot et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150192141 Nowitzki et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150204336 McManus et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150233228 Roth Aug 2015 A1
20150308245 Stewart et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150308444 Trottman Oct 2015 A1
20150318920 Johnston Nov 2015 A1
20150330194 June et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150354308 June et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150354590 Kao Dec 2015 A1
20150376907 Nguyen Dec 2015 A1
20160010451 Melo Jan 2016 A1
20160016834 Dahule Jan 2016 A1
20160024849 Kocis et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160164377 Gauthier Jun 2016 A1
20160168957 Tubel Jun 2016 A1
20160169231 Michelassi et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160177659 Voll et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160273947 Mu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160305447 Dreiss et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160332856 Steedley Nov 2016 A1
20170012491 Schob et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170033713 Petroni Feb 2017 A1
20170038246 Coates et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170058664 Xiao et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170074082 Palmer Mar 2017 A1
20170075029 Cuny et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170122046 Vavik May 2017 A1
20170138189 Ahmad et al. May 2017 A1
20170159668 Nowitzki et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170167498 Chang Jun 2017 A1
20170175752 Hofer et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170183942 Veland Jun 2017 A1
20170184097 Reeves Jun 2017 A1
20170194831 Marvel Jul 2017 A1
20170235006 Ellmauthaler et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170241421 Markovitch Aug 2017 A1
20170260846 Jin et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170292533 Zia Oct 2017 A1
20170321695 Head Nov 2017 A1
20170321711 Collins et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170328151 Dillard Nov 2017 A1
20170343006 Ehrsann Nov 2017 A1
20170346371 Gruetzner Nov 2017 A1
20170350399 Eslinger et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180045543 Farhadiroushan et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180052041 Yaman et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180058157 Melo et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180066671 Murugan Mar 2018 A1
20180128661 Munro May 2018 A1
20180134036 Galtarossa et al. May 2018 A1
20180155991 Arsalan et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180171763 Malbrel et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180171767 Huynh et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180172020 Ejim Jun 2018 A1
20180202843 Artuso et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180223642 Zahran Aug 2018 A1
20180223854 Brunvold et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180226174 Rose Aug 2018 A1
20180238152 Melo Aug 2018 A1
20180274311 Zsolt Sep 2018 A1
20180283155 Saponja Oct 2018 A1
20180284304 Barfoot et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180306019 Saponja Oct 2018 A1
20180306199 Reed Oct 2018 A1
20180320059 Cox et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180340389 Wang Nov 2018 A1
20180351480 Ahmad Dec 2018 A1
20180363660 Klahn Dec 2018 A1
20190025095 Steel Jan 2019 A1
20190032667 Ifrim et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190040863 Davis et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190049054 Gunnarsson Feb 2019 A1
20190128113 Ross et al. May 2019 A1
20190253003 Ahmad Aug 2019 A1
20190253004 Ahmad Aug 2019 A1
20190253005 Ahmad Aug 2019 A1
20190253006 Ahmad Aug 2019 A1
20190271217 Radov et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190368291 Xiao et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190376371 Arsalan Dec 2019 A1
20190376378 Saponja Dec 2019 A1
20200018317 Landi et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200032637 Saponja Jan 2020 A1
20200056462 Xiao et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200056615 Xiao et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200220431 Wrighton Jul 2020 A1
20200248538 Xiao et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200248695 Xiao et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200355184 Xiao et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210002985 Xiao Jan 2021 A1
20210040826 Xiao et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210372244 Riachentsev et al. Dec 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (120)
Number Date Country
1226325 Sep 1987 CA
2629578 Oct 2009 CA
2168104 Jun 1994 CN
1507531 Jun 2004 CN
101328769 Dec 2008 CN
101328796 Dec 2008 CN
101592475 Dec 2009 CN
201496028 Jun 2010 CN
101842547 Sep 2010 CN
102471701 May 2012 CN
101488805 Aug 2012 CN
202851445 Apr 2013 CN
103185025 Jul 2013 CN
203420906 Feb 2014 CN
103913186 Jul 2014 CN
104100231 Oct 2014 CN
104141633 Nov 2014 CN
104533797 Apr 2015 CN
105043586 Nov 2015 CN
103835988 Jan 2016 CN
105239963 Jan 2016 CN
105422047 Mar 2016 CN
103717901 Jun 2016 CN
106133326 Nov 2016 CN
107144339 Sep 2017 CN
206496768 Sep 2017 CN
105371943 Jun 2018 CN
107664541 Jun 2018 CN
108534910 Sep 2018 CN
104236644 Dec 2018 CN
2260678 Jun 1974 DE
3022241 Dec 1981 DE
3444859 Jun 1985 DE
3520884 Jan 1986 DE
19654092 Jul 1998 DE
10307887 Oct 2004 DE
102007005426 May 2008 DE
102008001607 Nov 2009 DE
102008054766 Jun 2010 DE
202012103729 Oct 2012 DE
102012215023 Jan 2014 DE
102012022453 May 2014 DE
102013200450 Jul 2014 DE
102012205757 Aug 2014 DE
0380148 Aug 1990 EP
579981 Jan 1994 EP
0579981 Jan 1994 EP
0637675 Feb 1995 EP
1101024 May 2001 EP
1143104 Oct 2001 EP
1270900 Jan 2003 EP
1369588 Dec 2003 EP
2072971 Jun 2009 EP
2801696 Dec 2014 EP
2893301 May 2018 EP
3527830 Aug 2019 EP
670206 Apr 1952 GB
2166472 May 1986 GB
2173034 Oct 1986 GB
2218721 Nov 1989 GB
2226776 Jul 1990 GB
2283035 Apr 1995 GB
2348674 Oct 2000 GB
2477909 Aug 2011 GB
2504104 Jan 2014 GB
S 57146891 Sep 1982 JP
4019375 Jan 1992 JP
2003502155 Jan 2003 JP
2005076486 Mar 2005 JP
2006510484 Mar 2006 JP
2010156172 Jul 2010 JP
2013110910 Jun 2013 JP
2014047422 Mar 2014 JP
98500 Oct 2010 RU
122531 Nov 2012 RU
178531 Apr 2018 RU
WO 1993006331 Apr 1993 WO
WO 1995004869 Feb 1995 WO
WO 1998046857 Oct 1998 WO
WO 1999027256 Jun 1999 WO
WO 2002072998 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2005066502 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2006117935 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2009046709 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009113894 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009129607 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2011066050 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2011101296 Aug 2011 WO
WO 2011133620 Oct 2011 WO
WO 2011135541 Nov 2011 WO
WO 2012058290 May 2012 WO
WO 2012166638 Dec 2012 WO
WO 2013005091 Jan 2013 WO
WO 2013089746 Jun 2013 WO
WO 2013171053 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2014116458 Jul 2014 WO
WO 2014127035 Aug 2014 WO
WO 2014147645 Sep 2014 WO
WO 2015034482 Mar 2015 WO
WO 2015041655 Mar 2015 WO
WO 2015073018 May 2015 WO
WO 2015084926 Jun 2015 WO
WO 2015123236 Aug 2015 WO
WO 2016003662 Jan 2016 WO
WO 2016012245 Jan 2016 WO
WO 2016050301 Apr 2016 WO
WO 2016081389 May 2016 WO
WO 2016089526 Jun 2016 WO
WO 2016111849 Jul 2016 WO
WO 2016130620 Aug 2016 WO
WO 2016160016 Oct 2016 WO
WO 2016195643 Dec 2016 WO
WO 2017021553 Feb 2017 WO
WO 2017146593 Aug 2017 WO
WO 2018022198 Feb 2018 WO
WO 2018096345 May 2018 WO
WO 2018125071 Jul 2018 WO
WO 2018145215 Aug 2018 WO
WO 2019243789 Dec 2019 WO
WO 2020165046 Aug 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (72)
Entry
“Echo Dissolvable Fracturing Plug,” EchoSeries, Dissolvable Fracturing Plugs, Gryphon Oilfield Solutions, Aug. 2018, 1 page.
“TervAlloy Degradable Magnesium Alloys,” Terves Engineered Response, Engineered for Enhanced Completion Efficiency, Feb. 2018, 8 pages.
“Ocean Exploration and Resource Development Technology”, Editorial Board of Science and Technology Prospering the Sea Series, Ocean Press, Oct. 31, 2001, pp. 79, 14 pages, English Abstract only.
Abelsson et al., “Development and Testing of a Hybrid Boosting Pump,” OTC 21516, Offshore Technology Conference, presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, May 2-5, 2011, 9 pages.
Alhanati et al., “ESP Failures: Can we talk the same language?” SPE paper, SPE ESP Workshop held in Houston, Apr. 25-27, 2001, 11 page.
Alhasan et al., “Extending mature field production life using a multiphase twin screw pump,” BHR Group Multiphase 15, 2011, 11 pages.
Baker Hughes, “Multiphase Pump: Increases Efficiency and Production in Wells with High Gast Content,” Brochure overview, retrieved from URL <https://assets.www.bakerhughes.com/system/69/00d970d9dd11e3a411ddf3c1325ea6/28592.MVP_Overview.pdf>, 2014, 2 pages.
Bao et al., “Recent development in the distributed fiber optic acoustic and ultrasonic detection,” Journal of Lightwave Technology 35:16, Aug. 15, 2017, 12 pages.
Blunt, “Effects of heterogeneity and wetting on relative permeability using pore level modeling,” SPE 36762, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE Journal 2:01 (70-87), Mar. 1997, 19 pages.
Bryant and Blunt, “Prediction of relative permeability in simple porous media,” Physical Review A 46:4, Aug. 1992, 8 pages.
Bybee et al., “Through-Tubing Completions Maximize Production,” SPE-0206-0057, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Drilling and Cementing Technology, JPT, Feb. 2006, 2 pages.
Champion et al., “The application of high-power sound waves for wellbore cleaning,” SPE 82197, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, May 13-14, 2003, 10 pages.
Chappell and Lancaster, “Comparison of methodological uncertainties within permeability measurements,” Wiley InterScience, Hydrological Processes 21:18 (2504-2514), Jan. 2007, 11 pages.
Chen et al., “Distributed acoustic sensor based on two-mode fiber,” Optics Express, 26:19, Sep. 17, 2018, 9 pages.
Corona et al., “Novel Washpipe-Free ICD Completion With Dissolvable Material,” OTC-28863-MS, Offshore Technology Conference (OTC), presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, April 30-May 3, 2018, 10 pages.
Cox et al., “Realistic Assessment of Proppant Pack Conductivity for Material Section,” SPE-84306-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 5-8, 2003, 12 pages.
Cramer et al., “Development and Application of a Downhole Chemical Injection Pump for Use in ESP Applications,” SPE 14403, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 66th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 22-25, 1985, 6 page.
Danfoss, “Facts Worth Knowing about Frequency Converters,” Handbook VLT Frequency Converters, Danfoss Engineering Tomorrow, 180 pages.
DiCarlo et al., “Three-phase relative permeability of water-wet, oil-wet, and mixed-wet sandpacks,” SPE 60767, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1998 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 27-30, 1998, SPE Journal 5:01 (82-91), Mar. 2000, 10 pages.
Dixit et al., “A pore-level investigation of relative permeability hysteresis in water-wet systems,” SPE 37233, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1997 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Feb. 18-21, 1997, SPE Journal 3:02 (115-123), Jun. 1998, 9 pages.
Drozdov et al., “The Use of Umbilicals as a New Technology of Artificial-Lift Operation of Oil and Gas Wells without Well Killing when Workover,” SPE 160689, Society of Petroleum Engineers, presented at the SPE Russian Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Technical Conference and Exhibition in Moscow, Russia, Oct. 16-18, 2012, 8 pages.
ejprescott.com [online], “Water, Sewer and Drain Fittings B-22, Flange Adaptors,” retrieved from URL <https://www.ejprescott.com/media/reference/FlangeAdaptorsB-22.pdf> retrieved on Jun. 15, 2020, available on or before Nov. 2010 via wayback machine URL <http://web.archive.org/web/20101128181255/https://www.ejprescott.com/media/reference/FlangeAdaptorsB-22.pdf>, 5 pages.
Fatt, “The network model of porous media,” SPE 574-G, I. Capillary Pressure Characteristics, AIME Petroleum Transactions 207: 144-181, Dec. 1956, 38 pages.
Fornarelli et al., “Flow patterns and heat transfer around six in-line circular cylinders at low Reynolds number,” JP Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Pushpa Publishing House, Allahabad, India, Feb. 2015, 11:1 (1-28), 28 pages.
Geary et al., “Downhole Pressure Boosting in Natural Gas Wells: Results from Prototype Testing,” SPE 11406, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 20-22, 2008, 13 pages.
Gillard et al., “A New Approach to Generating Fracture Conductivity,” SPE-135034-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 20-22, 2010, 14 pages.
Godbole et al., “Axial Thrust in Centrifugal Pumps—Experimental Analysis,” Paper Ref: 2977, presented at the 15th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, ICEM15, Jul. 22-27, 2012, 14 pages.
Gomaa et al., “Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied To Investigate Development and Optimization of Highly Conductive Channels within the Fracture Geometry,” SPE-179143-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE Production & Operations, 32:04, Nov. 2017, 12 pages.
Gomaa et al., “Improving Fracture Conductivity by Developing and Optimizing a Channels Within the Fracture Geometry: CFD Study,” SPE-178982-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Feb. 24-26, 2016, 25 pages.
Govardhan et al., “Critical mass in vortex-induced vibration of a cylinder,” European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids, Jan.-Feb. 2004, 23:1 (17-27), 11 pages.
Heiba et al., “Percolation theory of two-phase relative permeability,” SPE Reservoir Engineering 7:01 (123-132), Feb. 1992, 11 pages.
Hua et al., “Comparison of Multiphase Pumping Techniques for Subsea and Downhole Applications,” SPE 146784, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2011, Oil and Gas Facilities, Feb. 2012, 11 pages.
Hui and Blunt, “Effects of wettability on three-phase flow in porous media” American Chemical Society (ACS), J. Phys. Chem. 104 :16 (3833-3845), Feb. 2000, 13 pages.
Juarez and Taylor, “Field test of a distributed fiber-optic intrusion sensor system for long perimeters,” Applied Optics 46:11, Apr. 10, 2007, 4 pages.
Keiser, “Optical fiber communications,” 26-57, McGraw Hill, 2008, 16 pages.
Kern et al., “Propping Fractures With Aluminum Particles,” SPE-1573-G-PA, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Journal of Per. Technology, 13:6 (583-589), Jun. 1961, 7 pages.
Krag et al., “Preventing Scale Deposition Downhole Using High Frequency Electromagnetic AC Signals from Surface Enhance Production Offshore Denmark,” SPE-170898-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 27-29, 2014, 10 pages.
laserfocusworld.com [online], “High-Power Lasers: Fiber lasers drill for oil,” Dec. 5, 2012, retrieved on May 31, 2018, retrieved from URL: <https://www.laserfocusworld.com/articles/print/volume-48/issue-12/world-news/high-power-lasers-fiber-lasers-drill-for-oil.html>, 4 pages.
Li et al., “In Situ Estimation of Relative Permeability from Resistivity Measurements,” EAGE/The Geological Society of London, Petroleum Geoscience 20: 143-151, 2014, 10 pages.
machinedesign.com [online], Frances Richards, “Motors for efficiency: Permanent-magnet, reluctance, and induction motors compared,” Apr. 2013, retrieved on Nov. 11, 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.machinedesign.com/motors-drives/article/21832406/motors-for-efficiency-permanentmagnet-reluctance-and-induction-motors-compared>.
Mahmud et al., “Effect of network topology on two-phase imbibition relative permeability,” Transport in Porous Media 66:3 (481-493), Feb. 2007, 14 pages.
Meyer et al., “Theoretical Foundation and Design Formulae for Channel and Pillar Type Propped Fractures—A Method to Increase Fracture Conductivity,” SPE-170781-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 27-29, 2014, 25 pages.
Mirza, “The Next Generation of Progressive Cavity Multiphase Pumps use a Novel Design Concept for Superior Performance and Wet Gas Compression,” Flow Loop Testing, BHR Group, 2007, 9 pages.
Mirza, “Three Generations of Multiphase Progressive Cavity Pumping,” Cahaba Media Group, Upstream Pumping Solutions, Winter 2012, 6 pages.
Muswar et al., “Physical Water Treatment in the Oil Field Results from Indonesia,” SPE 113526, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 18-20, 2010, 11 pages.
Nagy et al., “Comparison of permeability testing methods,” Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 399-402, 2013, 4 pages.
Palisch et al., “Determining Realistic Fracture Conductivity and Understanding its Impact on Well Performance—Theory and Field Examples,” SPE-106301-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2007 SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, Jan. 29-31, 2007, 13 pages.
Parker, “About Gerotors,” Parker Haffinfin Corp, 2008, 2 pages.
Poollen et al., “Hydraulic Fracturing—FractureFlow Capacity vs Well Productivity,” SPE-890-G, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at 32nd Annual Fall Meeting of Society of Petroleum Engineers, Oct. 6-9, 1957, published as Petroleum Transactions AIME 213, 1958, 5 pages.
Poollen, “Productivity vs Permeability Damage in Hydraulically Produced Fractures,” Paper 906-2-G, American Petroleum Institute, presented at Drilling and Production Practice, Jan. 1, 1957, 8 pages.
Purcell, “Capillary pressures—their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefrom,” Petroleum Transactions, AIME, presented at the Branch Fall Meeting, Oct. 4-6, 1948, Journal of Petroleum Technology 1:02 (39-48), Feb. 1949, 10 pages.
Qin et al., “Signal-to-Noise Ratio Enhancement Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition in Phase-Sensitive Optical Time Domain Reflectometry Systems,” Sensors, MDPI, 17:1870, Aug. 14, 2017, 10 pages.
Qin Guozhi et al., “Anti-corrosion Coating Technology and Equipment Application Manual”, Sinopec Press, Jun. 30, 2004, pp. 257, 19 pages, English Abstract only.
Rzeznik et al., “Two Year Results of a Breakthrough Physical Water Treating System for the Control of Scale in Oilfield Applications,” SPE114072, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the 2008 SPE International Oilfield Scale Conference, May 28-29, 2008, 11 pages.
Schlumberger, “AGH: Advanced Gas-Handling Device,” Product Sheet, retrieved from URL: <http://www.slb.com/˜/media/Files/artificial_lift/product_sheets/ESPs/advanced_gas_handling_ps.pdf>, Jan. 2014, 2 pages.
Schöneberg, “Wet Gas Compression with Twin Screw Pumps,” Bornemann Pumps, Calgary Pump Symposium 2005, 50 pages.
Simpson et al., “A Touch, Truly Multiphase Downhole Pump for Unconventional Wells,” SPE-185152-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Electric Submersible Pump Symposium, the Woodlands, Texas, Apr. 24-28, 2017, 20 pages.
Sulzer Technical Review, “Pushing the Boundaries of Centrifugal Pump Design,” Oil and Gas, Jan. 2014, 2 pages.
Takahashi et al., “Degradation Study on Materials for Dissolvable Frac Plugs,” URTEC-2901283-MS, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTC), presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Jul. 23-25, 2018, 9 pages.
Tinsley and Williams, “A new method for providing increased fracture conductivity and improving stimulation results,” SPE-4676-PA, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Journal of Petroleum Technology, 27:11, Nov. 1975, 7 pages.
tm4.com [online], “Outer rotor for greater performance,” available on or before Dec. 5, 2017, via internet archive: Wayback Machine URL <https://web.archive.org/web/20171205163856/https://www.tm4.com/technology/electric-motors/external-rotor-motor-technology/>, retrieved on May 17, 2017, retrieved from URL <https://www.tm4.com/technology/electric-motors/external-rotor-motor-technology/>, 2 pages.
Vincent, “Examining Our Assumptions—Have Oversimplifications Jeopardized our Ability To Design Optimal Fracture Treatments,” SPE-119143-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2009 SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, Jan. 19-21, 2009, 51 pages.
Vincent, “Five Things You Didn't Want to Know about Hydraulic Fractures,” ISRM-ICHF-2013-045, presented at the International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing: An ISRM specialized Conference, May 20-22, 2013, 14 pages.
Vysloukh, “Chapter 8: Stimulated Raman Scattering,” 298-302, in Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 1990, 5 pages.
Walker et al., “Proppants, We Don't Need No Proppants—A Perspective of Several Operators,” SPE-38611-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 1997 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 5-8, 1997, 8 pages.
Wang Bing et al., “Wellbore Scaling and Descaling Research,” Oil Field Equipment, Nov. 2007, 36(11): 17-21, English Abstract.
Wang et al., “Rayleigh scattering in few-mode optical fibers,” Scientific reports, 6:35844, Oct. 2016, 8 pages.
Wylde et al., “Deep Downhole Chemical Injection on BP-Operated Miller: Experience and Learning,” SPE 92832, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2005 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, May 11-12, 2005, SPE Production & Operations, May 2006, 6 pages.
Xiao et al., “Induction Versus Permanent Magnet Motors for ESP Applications,” SPE-192177-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Apr. 23-26, 2018, 15 pages.
Yamate et al., “Optical Sensors for the Exploration of Oil and Gas,” Journal of Lightwave Technology 35:16, Aug. 15, 2017, 8 pages.
Yu et al., “Borehole seismic survey using multimode optical fibers in a hybrid wireline,” Measurement, Sep. 2018, 125:694-703, 10 pages.
Zhan et al., “Characterization of Reservoir Heterogeneity Through Fluid Movement Monitoring with Deep Electromagnetic and Pressure Measurements,” SPE 116328, Society of Petroleum Engineers International (SPE), presented at the 2008 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 21-24, 2008, 16 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230184077 A1 Jun 2023 US