For the past several decades, engineers have worked to develop apparatus and methods to effectively obtain information about downhole formations, especially during the process of drilling and following this process using wireline methods or pushed tool methods for use in horizontal wells. These methods may be collectively referred to as logging. During the drilling process and, with time afterward, drilling fluids begin to flush and intermingle with the natural fluids in the formation forming an invasion zone near the drilled borehole. This fluid exchange increases with time and the formation wall can degrade or become damaged with further drilling operations which can mask or alter information about the formation that is of interest. Logging-while-drilling (LWD) refers to a set of processes commonly used by the industry to obtain information about a formation during the drilling process. In some cases the acquired data from components located downhole on oil and gas drilling strings are transmitted to the ground's surface. Measurement-while-drilling (MWD) and LWD methods are also used in smart drilling systems to aid and/or direct the drilling operations and in some cases to maintain the drill in a specific zone of interest. The terms MWD and LWD are often used interchangeably in the industry and LWD will be used here to refer to both methods with the understanding that the LWD encompasses systems that collect formation, angular rotation rate and depth information and store this information for later retrieval and/or transmission of this information to the surface while drilling.
A common sensor used in logging systems is for the measurement of resistivity or the complement conductivity. The resistivity of the formation is quite often measured at different depths into the formation to determine the amount of fluid invasion and aid in the calculation of true formation resistivity. The formation resistivity is generally used with other sensors in an analysis to determine many other formation parameters. There are various types of resistivity sensors including direct current (DC), and alternating current (AC) focused resistivity which utilizes one or more electrodes devices, AC scanned resistivity which measures in a specific circumferential or angular pattern around the borehole and a fourth type called induction or propagation resistivity which also utilizes AC methods. Induction resistivity sensors generally use lower frequencies below 100 KHz while propagation sensors use higher frequencies. The terms induction sensor or induction tool will be used interchangeably here and will refer to both induction and propagation resistivity methods.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,677,756 to Fanini et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,359,438 to Bittar; U.S. Pat. No. 6,538,447 to Bittar; U.S. Pat. No. 6,218,842 to Bittar et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,163,155 to Bittar; U.S. Pat. No. 6,476,609 to Bittar; U.S. Pat. No. 6,577,129 to Thompson et al; U.S. Pat. No. 7,141,981 to Folberth et al; U.S. Pat. No. 5,045,795 to Gianzero, et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,606,260 to Giordano et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,100,696 to Sinclair, each of which is herein incorporated by reference for all that it contains, disclose embodiments of downhole sensors that may be consistent with the present invention.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/676,494, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,265,649 to Hall et al.; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/687,891, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,301.429 to Hall et al.; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/041,754, now published U.S. Patent Publication No. 2008/0265892 to Snyder et al., each of which is herein incorporated by reference for all that it contains, disclose embodiments of induction resistivity tools.
In one aspect of the invention, a downhole sensor system comprises at least one downhole sensor disposed on or within a downhole component of a tool string. In some embodiments, the system is a closed-loop system. The downhole sensor is adapted to detect at least one characteristic of a downhole formation adjacent the downhole component. The downhole sensor has a variable sampling rate controlled by a processing element. The processing element is in electrical communication with a tool string rate-of-penetration sensor and/or a tool string rotational speed sensor. The processing element is adapted to vary the sampling rate in response to the rate-of-penetration and/or rotational speed of the tool string. In some embodiments, the sampling rate may be varied in response to drilling dynamics, distributed measurements, weight-on-bit, torque, acceleration, or combinations thereof. The downhole sensor may be mounted in at least one radial recess in an outer wall of the downhole component or within the wall itself. In some embodiments, the sensor may be incorporated in a drill bit such as the bits disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0114062, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,398,837 to Hall et al., which is herein incorporated by reference for all that it discloses. The sensors may also be distributed along the drill string such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,139,218 to Hall et al., which is also herein incorporated by reference for all that it discloses.
The downhole sensor may be adapted to sense natural gamma rays, acoustics, salinity, neutrons, a nuclear radiation, pressure, formation porosity, formation density, formation electrical conductivity, formation hardness, or combinations thereof. The downhole sensor may communicate with the processing element over a downhole network integrated into the downhole tool string. The system may be incorporated into a drilling string, a tool string, a pushed coil tubing string, a wireline system, a cable system, a geosteering system, or combinations thereof.
The system may comprise a plurality of sensors disposed discretely along an outer diameter of the downhole component. Each sensor may be adapted to detect the same formation characteristic as each of the other sensors. In some embodiments at least one of the plurality of sensors is adapted to detect a different formation characteristic than at least one other sensor.
The downhole sensor may comprise a sensor transmitter adapted to project a sensor signal into the formation and a sensor receiver adapted to detect the projected sensor signal after the signal has entered the formation. The detected sensor signal may comprise an altered signal characteristic compared to the projected signal.
The downhole sensor may comprise a plurality of adjacent sensor segments disposed continuously around at least 25% of an outer diameter of the downhole component. At least two adjacent sensor segments may be adapted to switch back and forth between a series and parallel electrical connection to one another. A location of at least one of the plurality of sensor segments may project a sensor signal into a selected portion of a formation. The sensor segments may be selectively activated to sample a selected portion of the formation. Adjacent sensor segments may be serially activated to continuously sample a selected portion of the formation. The sensor segments that are selected to be activated may be selected by the processing element in response to the rate-of-penetration and/or rotational speed of the tool string.
The downhole sensor may be a lateralog resistivity tool or an inductive resistivity tool. The downhole sensor may be adapted to project an induction signal outward from an outer diameter of the downhole component when the downhole sensor is carrying an electrical current. The downhole sensor may comprise at least one induction receiver assembly comprising at least one receiver coil wound about at least one core. In some embodiments of the invention at least part of the downhole sensor may be disposed on an outer extendable pad that extends away from an outer wall of the downhole component and toward the formation and is connected to the outer wall by an arm assembly. In some embodiments, the sampling rate is increases as the tool string as the rotational speed slows down or speeds up. The processing element may be adapted to activate a plurality of sensors to sample the formation in an axial direction. This may be accomplished when the tool string is rotating or is rotationally stationary.
Referring now to
The tool string 31 or surface equipment 33 may comprise an energy source or multiple energy sources. The energy source may transmit electrical current to one or more downhole components 36 on the bottom hole assembly 37 or along the tool string 31. At least one downhole sensor 107 is disposed on or within one or more downhole components 36 of the tool string 31. The sensor is adapted to detect at least one characteristic of a downhole formation adjacent the downhole component or a downhole drilling condition In
The downhole sensor 107 comprises a sampling rate defined by the number of formation characteristic data points obtained by the sensor in a given amount of time. In the present embodiment the downhole sensor 107 comprises a variable sampling rate, indicating that the number of formation characteristic data points obtained by the sensor in a given amount of time may be increased or decreased. Sampling rate variability may be desired as tool strings 31 enter new formation strata 101-106 as the characteristics of the strata 101-106 may vary from one another. Varying the sampling rate may optimize the amount and quality of data obtained through the downhole sensor, as well as minimizing the nonessential use of energy in the sensor.
Because rate-of-penetration (ROP) and rotational speed (RS) of the tool string are two indicators of types of tool string movement in relation to the formation targeted for sampling, these parameters may be important for determining ideal sampling rates in real-time. Also, sensors with a non-variable sample rate generally may rely on the RS for their sampling rate of a selected portion of the formation. For example, the sensor may sample the selected portion of the formation once for each complete rotation of the tool string 31. Varying the sampling rate in response to the RS may allow sampling of the selected portion of the formation to be independent of the RS in the sense that a lower RS need not necessitate a lower sampling rate. For example, the variable . . . sampling rate may be increased to respond to the slower RS to keep the original sampling rate constant.
Having a network in the tool string 31 may enable high-speed communication between each device connected to it and facilitate the transmission and receipt of data between downhole sensors 107 and data processing elements or between energy sources and energy receivers. Data may be transmitted along the tool string 31 through techniques known in the art. A preferred method of downhole data transmission using inductive couplers disposed in tool joints is disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 6,670,880 to Hall, et al., which is herein incorporated by reference for all it discloses. An alternate data transmission path may comprise direct electrical contacts in tool joints such as in the system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,688,396 to Floerke, et al., which is herein incorporated by reference for all that it discloses. Another data transmission system that may also be adapted for use with the present invention is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,641,434 to Boyle, et al., which is also herein incorporated by reference for all that it discloses.
In some embodiments, of the present invention alternative forms of telemetry may be used to communicate with the downhole components 36, such as telemetry systems that communicate through the drilling mud or through the earth. Such telemetry systems may use electromagnetic or acoustic waves. The alternative forms of telemetry may be the primary telemetry system for communication with the tool string 31 or they may be back-up systems designed to maintain some communication if the primary telemetry system fails. A data swivel 34 or a wireless top-hole data connection may facilitate the transfer of data between components 36 of the rotatable tool string 31 and a non-rotating drilling rig 150. Preferably the downhole tool string 31 is a drill string. In other embodiments the downhole tool string 31 is part of a coiled tubing logging system, a pushed coil tubing string, a wireline system, a cable system, a geosteering system, a production well, or combinations thereof.
A processing element 305 may be in communication with the downhole tool string components 36 through a downhole network as discussed previously and/or through an electrically conductive medium. For example, a coaxial cable, wire, twisted pair of wires or combinations thereof may travel from the surface to at least one downhole tool string component. The mediums may be in inductive or electrical communication with each other through couplers positioned so as to allow signal transmission across the connection of the downhole component and the tool string. The couplers may be disposed within recesses in either a primary or secondary shoulder of the connection or they may be disposed within inserts positioned within the bores of the drill bit assembly and the downhole tool string component 36. As the control equipment receives information indicating specific formation qualities, the control equipment may then change drilling parameters according to the data received to optimize drilling efficiency. Operation of the drill string 31 may include the ability to steer the direction of drilling based on the data either manually or automatically.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The downhole sensor may serially activate each sensor segment 502 to generate one 360 degree sweep of the formation. In some embodiments the 360 degree sweep of the formation may occur faster or slower than a single 360 degree rotation of the downhole component 36. This may be accomplished by serially activating adjacent sensor components 502 at a speed faster or slower than would be required to maintain a constant selected portion 1401, which constant selected portion 1401 was described previously in the description of
The processing element 305 may select specific sensor segments 502 to be activated and/or deactivated in response to the ROP and/or rotational speed of the tool string 31. In some embodiments, serially activating adjacent sensor segments 502 may allow the downhole sensor 107 to continue to selectively sample the formation 315 on opposite sides of the downhole component 36 even when the component 36 is not itself rotating.
In
Whereas the present invention has been described in particular relation to the drawings attached hereto, it should be understood that other and further modifications apart from those shown or suggested herein, may be made within the scope and spirit of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2414719 | Cloud | Jan 1947 | A |
3967201 | Rorden | Jun 1976 | A |
4416494 | Watkins | Nov 1983 | A |
4785247 | Meador | Nov 1988 | A |
4806928 | Vereruso | Feb 1989 | A |
4919201 | Bridges et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4933640 | Kuckes | Jun 1990 | A |
5045795 | Gianzero et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5337002 | Mercer | Aug 1994 | A |
5606260 | Giordano et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
6100696 | Sinclair | Aug 2000 | A |
6163155 | Bittar | Dec 2000 | A |
6218842 | Bittar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223826 | Chau | May 2001 | B1 |
6359438 | Bittar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367564 | Mills | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392317 | Hall | May 2002 | B1 |
6446728 | Chau | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6476609 | Bittar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6538447 | Bittar | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6577129 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6641434 | Boyle et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651755 | Kelpe | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6655464 | Chau | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670880 | Hall | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6677756 | Fanini et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688396 | Floerke et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6717501 | Hall | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6739413 | Sharp | May 2004 | B2 |
6799632 | Hall | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6821147 | Hall | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830467 | Hall | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6844498 | Hall | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845822 | Chau | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6871713 | Meister et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888473 | Hall | May 2005 | B1 |
6913093 | Hall | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929493 | Hall | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945802 | Hall | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6968611 | Hall | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7028779 | Chau | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7139218 | Hall et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141981 | Folberth et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7150329 | Chau | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7265649 | Hall et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7301429 | Hall et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7398837 | Hall et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7583085 | Hall et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7588083 | Newman | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20040104797 | Hall | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113808 | Hall | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040145492 | Hall | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150532 | Hall | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164833 | Hall | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164838 | Hall | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216847 | Hall | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244916 | Hall | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244964 | Hall | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040246142 | Hall | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001735 | Hall | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050001736 | Hall | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050001738 | Hall | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050035874 | Hall | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035875 | Hall | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035876 | Hall | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036507 | Hall | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039912 | Hall | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045339 | Hall | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046586 | Hall | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046590 | Hall | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067159 | Hall | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070144 | Hall | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082092 | Hall | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092499 | Hall | May 2005 | A1 |
20050093296 | Hall | May 2005 | A1 |
20050095827 | Hall | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115717 | Hall | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145406 | Hall | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050150653 | Hall | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161215 | Hall | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050173128 | Hall | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194134 | McGregor et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050194182 | Rodney et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050199425 | Estes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212530 | Hall | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236160 | Hall | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050284662 | Hall | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070272442 | Pastusek et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080264624 | Hall et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080265892 | Snyder et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090266609 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |