In oil and gas production wells, scale formation is a significant issue. As used herein, the term “scale” refers to deposits or coatings formed on borehole tubulars and components. Produced water includes formation water that is often saturated with mineral ions. During well operation, formation water may mix with water from other zones, injected water from injection wells, or other injected materials that may have different ionic species. This mixing of incompatible water, along with changes in temperature or pressure, often results in the development of scale. Common scales include calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, barium sulfate, strontium sulfate, iron sulfide, zinc sulfide, iron carbonate, iron oxides, and barium strontium sulfate. Scale builds up on the surfaces of borehole tubulars and/or components in contact with produced water, impeding fluid flow. If no countermeasures are taken, the borehole tubulars and/or components may become completely blocked over time.
Corrosion is also a large concern in oil and gas production wells. As used herein, the term “corrosion” refers to a loss of metal due to chemical or electrochemical reactions. Borehole tubulars and components are typically made of steel, an alloy consisting mostly of iron. When iron is in contact with water containing dissolved oxygen, sulfur dioxide, and/or carbon dioxide, iron hydroxide species can form on the surface of the iron. Similarly, when iron is in contact with water containing dissolved carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide, iron sulfide species can form on the iron surface. As the iron hydroxide or iron sulfide species flake off from the surface, fresh iron is exposed. This corrosion process continues until either all of the iron is consumed, or until one of the reactant species is removed or consumed. Corrosion products that accumulate such as iron hydroxide and iron sulfide may also be considered as scale.
Inhibitors are often periodically circulated through the various flow paths of a well to prevent or reduce scaling and/or corrosion. However, such inhibitors are often unnecessary or are overused as a precautionary measure due to a lack of knowledge about the precise conditions downhole.
A better understanding of the various disclosed embodiments can be obtained when the detailed description is considered in conjunction with the attached drawings, in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various alternative forms, equivalents, and modifications, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto do not limit the disclosure, but on the contrary, they provide the foundation for alternative forms, equivalents, and modifications falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The problems outlined above are at least in part addressed by the disclosed systems and methods that employ downhole optical sensors for ion and/or chemical concentrations. At least some described downhole optical sensor system embodiments include one or more optical sensors positioned in a borehole and coupled to a surface interface via a fiber optic cable. Each of the optical sensors includes a waveguide for conducting light and a reagent region positioned between the waveguide and a fluid in the borehole to absorb a portion of the light from the waveguide, the portion being dependent upon a concentration of a chemical species in the fluid. (As the term “chemical species” is used herein, it encompasses any constitutionally or isotopically distinct atom, molecule, ion, radical, or complex.)
Turning now to the figures,
The well 10 is adapted to guide a desired fluid (e.g., oil or gas) from a bottom of the borehole 16 to a surface of the earth 18. Perforations 26 have been formed at a bottom of the borehole 16 to facilitate the flow of a fluid 28 from a surrounding formation (i.e., a “formation fluid”) into the borehole and thence to the surface via an opening 30 at the bottom of the production tubing string 24. Note that this well configuration is illustrative and not limiting on the scope of the disclosure.
As is typical, a majority of the components of the casing string 14 are made of steel, an alloy consisting mostly of iron. During operation of the well 10, the formation fluid flow carries a certain amount of water into the borehole and along the fluid flow path to the surface. This “produced water” often includes chemical species that cause scale buildup and/or corrosion in those components of the casing string 14 that are in contact with the formation fluid 28. As described in more detail below, the downhole optical sensor system 12 is adapted to detect concentration(s) of one or more chemical species in the formation fluid 28.
The detected chemical species may be, for example, known to cause scale buildup and/or corrosion on one or more metal surfaces of the casing string 14. Alternatively, or in addition, the detected chemical species may be representative of one or more scale inhibitor substance(s) or compound(s) introduced into the formation fluid 28 to combat scale buildup on one or more metal surfaces of the casing string 14, or by one or more corrosion inhibitor substance(s) or compound(s) introduced into the formation fluid 28 to combat corrosion on one or more metal surfaces of the casing string 14.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
In at least some embodiments, the fiber optic cable 44 terminates at surface interface 42 with an optical port adapted for coupling the fiber optic cable to a light source and a detector. The light source transmits light along the fiber optic cable to the optical sensor 40, which alters the light to provide some indication of a given chemical species concentration. The optical sensor 40 returns light along the fiber optic cable to the surface interface 42 where the optical port communicates it to the detector. The detector responsively produces an electrical output signal indicative of the concentration of the given chemical species in the formation fluid 28. The optical port may be configured to communicate the downgoing light signal along one or more optical fibers that are different from the optical fibers carrying the return light signal, or may be configured to use the same optical fibers for communicating both light signals.
The illustrative downhole optical sensor system 12 of
For example, the information storage media 68 may store a software program for execution by computer 60. The instructions of the software program may cause the computer 60 to collect information regarding downhole conditions including, e.g., a given chemical species concentration derived from the electrical signal from surface interface 42 and, based at least in part thereon, to determine the rate of scale buildup on the one or more components of the casing string 14, the rate of corrosion occurring on the one or more components of the casing string 14, and/or the estimated useful life of the one or more components of the casing string 14 subject to scale buildup and/or corrosion. The instructions of the software program may also cause the computer 60 to communicate to the user the rate of scale buildup, the corrosion rate, and/or the estimated useful life via the output device 64. Note that the scaling/corrosion information can be communicated via a graphical output device, via email or SMS text, via an audible or visual alarm indicator, or indeed by any suitable output technique.
The software program executed by the computer 60 may, for example, embody a model for predicting the rate of scale buildup, the corrosion rate, and/or the estimated useful life. Several suitable models are known in the oil and gas production industry. See, for example, “A Method for Predicting the Tendency of Oil Field Waters to Deposit Calcium Carbonate” by H. Stiff and L. E. Davis, Petroleum Transactions AIME, Vol. 195, 1952, pp. 213-216; “Scale Prediction for Oil and Gas Production” by Amy T. Kan and Mason B. Tomson, Society of Petroleum Engineers Paper No. 132237, International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, 8-10 Jun. 2010, Beijing, China; and “Validation of Scale Prediction Algorithms at Oilfield Conditions” by Amy T. Kan et al., Society of Petroleum Engineers Paper No. 93264, 2005 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, Tex., 2-4 Feb. 2005. The model employed by the software program may, for example, use the measurements of the concentrations of the one or more chemical species in the formation fluid 28, along with measurements of temperatures and/or pressures of the formation fluid 28 along its flow path, to predict the rate of scale buildup, the corrosion rate, and/or the estimated useful life.
The optical fiber 80 is provided with a sensing region 88 that, at least in some embodiments, is an exposed portion of the cladding layer 84 that may be further enhanced with a reagent designed to complex with a given chemical species in solution. The reagent region 88 of the optical sensor 40 surrounds the inner core 82 (i.e., the waveguide) and is in direct contact with both the waveguide and the formation fluid 28 (see
Within the optical sensor 40, a portion of the light passing through the inner core 82 (i.e., the waveguide) of the optical sensor 40 expectedly interacts with the reagent region 88. When the reagent complexes with a chemical species in the formation fluid 28, the complexes may more strongly or more weakly absorb the particular wavelength of light traveling through the reagent region 88. As a result, the intensity of the light exiting the optical sensor 40 may be reduced dependent upon the concentration of the chemical species in the formation fluid 28. Again, the chemical species may be chosen based on its ability to cause or indicate scale buildup and/or corrosion. Alternatively, or in addition, the chemical species may be chosen based on its ability to inhibit scale or corrosion or in some fashion indicate the presence of inhibitor substance(s) or compound(s) introduced into the fluid flow.
In at least some embodiments of the downhole optical sensor system 12, the light source in the surface interface 42 provides pulses of light via the optical port to the optical fiber 80 of the fiber optic cable 44. The light has, or includes, one or more wavelengths that are absorbed in the reagent region 88 of the optical sensor 40 when the reagent complexes with a selected chemical species in the formation fluid 28. The light may be or include, for example, near infrared light. When a light pulse reaches the optical sensor 40, the light passes through the optical sensor 40 and is altered (e.g., attenuated) within the reagent region 88 by an amount dependent on the concentration of the selected chemical species in the formation fluid 28.
The light traveling through the optical sensor 40 may be routed back to the surface along a different optical fiber in cable 44. In the illustrated embodiment, however, the light traveling through the optical sensor 40 reaches an end of the inner core 82, which is polished or mirrored to reflect a substantial portion of the light incident on it. The reflected light travels back through the optical sensor 40 on its way to the surface interface 42. During the return trip through the optical sensor, the light pulse is further altered (e.g., attenuated) within the reagent region 88 dependent upon the concentration of the selected chemical species in the formation fluid 28. The reflected pulse of light then travels back through the optical fiber 80 of the fiber optic cable 44 to the surface interface 42. A light detector in the surface interface 42 receives the reflected pulse of light and produces the electrical output signal indicative of the concentration of the selected chemical species in the formation fluid 28. For example, the detected intensity of the received light pulse at a given frequency may be proportional to the concentration of the given species. Alternatively, the detected intensity may be a nonlinear function of the transmitted light intensity and the concentration of the given species, but the surface interface or the computer is provided with sufficient information to derive the desired concentration measurement.
Other alternative embodiments employ composite tubing with one or more optical fibers embedded in the wall of the tubing. The composite tubing can be employed as the casing and/or the production string. In either case, a coupling or terminator can be provided at the end of the composite tubing to couple an optical sensor 40 to the embedded optical fiber. In still other embodiments, the light source and/or light detector may be positioned downhole and coupled to the surface interface 42 via electrical conductors.
The well 10 illustrated in
However, other well configurations are known that have a substantial number of flow paths, particularly wells designed to produce from multiple completion zones. It may be desirable to provide multiple optical sensors 40 so as to be able to individually monitor each fluid flow. Moreover, it may be desirable to provide multiple optical sensors along a given fluid flow path, as such a well configuration may create atypical pressure and temperature changes along the flow path and, in some cases, mixing with other fluid flows. While it is possible to provide such sensors by providing a separate fiber optic cable for each optical sensor, it will be in many cases more efficient to provide a single fiber optic cable with multiple sensors.
In the embodiment of
Where the fiber optic cable 44 includes multiple optical fibers or multi-stranded optical fibers, the optical sensors 120A-120E can be directly coupled to different ones of the optical fibers or strands. The optical splitters would not be needed in this variation. The detector 124 can be coupled to measure the total light returned along the multiple fibers or strands, as the travel time difference to the various sensors will convert the transmitted light pulse into a series of reflected light pulses, with each pulse representing a corresponding optical sensor measurement.
In the embodiment of
The light source 122 may produce light having components in each of the wavelength ranges corresponding to the optical sensors 120. As the light propagates along the fiber optic cable and through the optical sensors 120, each of the optical sensors alter the light components within their associated wavelength range. In the illustrated embodiment, the light reflects from the end of the cable and propagates back to the surface, passing a second time through each of the sensors which further alter (e.g., attenuate) the light component in their associated wavelength range. When the reflected light reaches the surface interface, the optical circulator 126 directs the reflected light to the light detector 124, which analyzes each of the wavelength ranges associated with the various sensors 120 to determine a measurement for each sensor.
The embodiment shown in
In many cases, the well's temperature and pressure profile may be predictable enough that a distributed temperature/pressure sensing system is deemed unnecessary, and in such cases it may be omitted. Where such a system is deemed useful, the downhole optical sensor system 12 may further operate as a distributed temperature and/or pressure measurement system. Such systems are commercially available and may be modified to provide the chemical species sensing described above without sacrificing their ability to obtain distributed temperature and/or pressure measurements. Such systems may operate based on measurements of backscattered light from impurities along the length of the fiber. Such backscattered light has properties indicative of temperature and stress at the scattering location. The surface interface transmits light pulses and measures the properties of the backscattered light as a function of time. Combined with knowledge of the light's propagation velocity in the fiber, such measurements can be readily converted to position-dependent measurements of pressure and temperature. These measurements may be made on the optical fibers coupling the surface interface to the downhole optical sensors, or they can be made on separate optical fibers provided within cable 44. Where separate fibers are used, an additional light source and detector can be employed, or the existing source and detector may be switched periodically between the fibers.
The multi-measurement fiber optic cable may, for example, be deployed in a borehole along a fluid flow path (e.g., cable 44 in
One or more corrective actions are taken in optional block 150 if the derived rate of scale buildup or corrosion is determined to be excessive. The corrective actions may include, for example, adjusting one or more fluid flow rates, circulating one or more inhibitors (e.g., introducing scale inhibitors or corrosion inhibitors), and replacing tubular strings (e.g., the production string 24 of
Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2660887 | Frei | Dec 1953 | A |
2852693 | Hughes et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2868625 | Frank et al. | Jan 1959 | A |
3019841 | Ternow et al. | Feb 1962 | A |
3282095 | Owens | Nov 1966 | A |
3522685 | Zimmerman et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3722271 | Horvitz | Mar 1973 | A |
4166216 | Cubberly | Aug 1979 | A |
4785247 | Meador et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4794336 | Marlow et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4802761 | Bowen et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4986121 | Luscombe | Jan 1991 | A |
5037172 | Hekman et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5351532 | Hager | Oct 1994 | A |
5429190 | Kilgore et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5626192 | Connell et al. | May 1997 | A |
5712828 | Luscombe et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5729013 | Bergren, III | Mar 1998 | A |
5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5943293 | Luscombe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6128251 | Erath et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160762 | Luscombe et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6188645 | Maida et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188646 | Luscombe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195162 | Varnham et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211964 | Luscombe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233746 | Skinner | May 2001 | B1 |
6256588 | Maida et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268911 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6307809 | Luscombe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6408943 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422084 | Fernald et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6522797 | Siems et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6561041 | Eck | May 2003 | B1 |
6591025 | Siems et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6627873 | Tchakarov et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6731389 | Luscombe et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6789621 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6834233 | Economides et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847034 | Shah et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853604 | Spackman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6891606 | Smith et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907170 | Maida | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6913083 | Smith | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931188 | Kersey et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939717 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957574 | Ogle | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7006918 | Economides et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7028773 | Fujisawa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7095012 | Fujisawa et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104324 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7159468 | Skinner et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163055 | Coon et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182134 | Wetzel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7216710 | Welton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219729 | Bostick, III et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219730 | Tilton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245791 | Rambow et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7408645 | DiFoggio | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7409858 | Dria et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7458273 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7461547 | Terabayashi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7511823 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529434 | Taverner et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7641395 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7665543 | Bostick, III et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7669440 | Kersey et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7733490 | Goodwin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7864321 | Caron et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7938178 | Ringgenberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8104338 | DiFoggio | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8230916 | Sumrall et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8447529 | Hernandez et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8831388 | Boersma | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8908165 | Tunheim et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20030205375 | Wright et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210403 | Luscombe et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050072678 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050169794 | Welton et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207279 | Chemali et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050263281 | Lovell et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010973 | Brown | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060081412 | Wright et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070010404 | Welton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070187648 | Welton et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193351 | DiFoggio | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080227668 | Welton et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080227669 | Welton | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080280789 | Welton et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080314139 | DiFoggio | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090120640 | Kulakofsky et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143258 | Welton et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090271115 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100177310 | DiFoggio | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100269579 | Lawrence et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110090496 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100629 | Welton et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110105368 | Welton et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109912 | Spross et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116099 | Spross et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110280103 | Bostick, III | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120257475 | Luscombe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130031970 | Freese et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130245947 | Samsom et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130332130 | Loveless et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 072 627 | Feb 1983 | EP |
2368391 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2 445 209 | Feb 2008 | GB |
WO-9857030 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-0181914 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-2006063094 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2008081467 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2011193401 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2013052891 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO-2013137992 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fan, Chunfang et al., “Scale Prediction and Inhibition for Unconventional Oil and Gas Production”, SPE 130690, SPE International Conference on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, May 26-27, 2010., pp. 1-22. |
Kohler, N. et al., “Static and Dynamic Evaluation of Calcium Carbonate Scale Formation and Inhibition”, SPE 68963, SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 21-22, 2001, p. 1-11. |
Nancollas, G. H., et al., “The Kinetics of Crystallization of Scale-Forming Minerals”, SPE 4360, Apr. 1974, 10 pages. |
IEEE, “IEEE Standard for Long Wavelength Wireless Network Protocol”, IEEE Std 1902.1, New York, NY, (Mar. 31, 2009), 35 pgs. |
Graber, Karen K., et al., “Drill String Tool Sheet”, Overview of Ocean Drilling Program, http://www.odp.tamu.edu/publications/tnotes/tn31/drill—s/drill—s.htm>.(retrieved Sep. 21, 2009), (Jul. 2004), pp. 1-3. |
Thompson Reuters, “RuBee, High-Security, Harsh-Environment RFID Alternative”, http:/'/www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS260082+11-Feb-2009+BW20090211>; (retrieved Sep. 21, 2009), (Feb. 11, 2009), pp. 1-2. |
Li, Weizhuo et al., “Wavelength Multiplexing of Microelectromechanical System Pressure and Temperature Sensors Using Fiber Bragg Gratings and Arrayed Waveguide Gratings”, Opt. Eng. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 0091-3286/2003, (Feb. 2003), pp. 431-438. |
Tudor, M.J. et al., “Silicon Resonator Sensors: Interrogation Techniques and Characteristics”, IEE Proceedings, vol. 135, Pt. D, No. 5, (Sep. 1988), pp. 364-368. |
“PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Sep. 29, 2009, Appl No. PCT/US2009/053492, A Near-Field Electromagnetic Communications Network for Downhole Telemetry, filed Aug. 11, 2009, 7 pgs. |
“PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, dated Sep. 26, 2013, Appl No. PCT/US2012/059091, “Downhole Species Selective Optical Fiber Sensor Systems and Methods”, filed Oct. 5, 2012, 27 pgs. |
“PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Apr. 4, 2013, Appl No. PCT/US2012/059091, “Downhole Species Selective Optical Fiber Sensor Systems and Methods”, filed Oct. 5, 2012, 27 pgs. |
“US Application”, dated Mar. 13, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 13/418,455, “Downhole Systems and Methods for Water Source Determination”, filed Mar. 13, 2012, 24 pgs. |
Angelidis, Diogenes et al., “Optical Micromachined Pressure Sensor for Aerospace Applications”, Optical Engineering, vol. 31, No. 8, (Aug. 1992), pp. 1636-1642. |
Aratani, K. “Process and Design Considerations for Surface Micromachined Beams for a Tuneable Interferometer Array in Silicon”, IEEE Xplore, IEEE, 1993, pp. 230-235. |
Burns, D. W., et al., “Thin Films for Micromechanical Sensors”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8(4), American Vacuum Society, (Jul. 1990), pp. 3606-3613. |
Fan, Chunfang et al., “Scale Prediction and Inhibition for Unconventional Oil and Gas Production”, SPE 130690, SPE International Conference on Oilfield Scale, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, May 26-27, 2010, pp. 1-22. |
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc, “StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service—FiberWatch Fiber Optic Distributed Temperature Sensing Technology”, Pinnacle, a Halliburton Services, http://www.halliburton.com/public/pe/contents/Data—Sheets/web/H/H04481.pdf, 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Hirschfeld, Tomas et al., “Feasibility of using fiber optics for monitoring groundwater contaminants”, Optical Engineering XP-002692941, vol. 22 No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 1983, pp. 527-531. |
Johnson, R. L., et al., “Miniature Instrument for the Measurement of Gap Thickness Using Poly-Chromatic Interferometry”, Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics, Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 9 pgs. |
Kan, Amy T., et al., “Scale Prediction for Oil and Gas Production”, SPE 132237, CPS/SPE International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition in China held in Beijing, China Jun. 8-10, 2010, 29 pages. |
Kohler, N. et al., “Static and Dynamic Evaluation of Calcium Carbonate Scale Formation and Inhibition”, SPE 68963, SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 21-22, 2001, pp. 1-11. |
MacDougall, Trevor W., et al., “Large Diameter Waveguide Bragg Grating Components and Their Application in Downhole Oil & Gas Sensing”, Weatherford International, Wallingford, CT, 12 pgs. |
Martins-Filho, Joaquim F., et al., “Optical Fibre Sensor System for Multipoint Corrosion Detection”, Optical Fiber New Developments, Christophe Lethien (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-7619-50-3, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/7579. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/optical-fiber-new-developments/optical-fibre-sensor-system-for-multipoint-corrosion-detection, (Dec. 1, 2009), pp. 36-42. |
Nancollas, G. H., et al., “The Kinetics of Crystallization of Scale-Forming Minerals”, SPE 4360, Apr. 1974, 10 pgs. |
Pitcher, R. J., et al., “Optothermal Drive of Silicon Resonators: The Influence of Surface Coatings”, Sensors and Actuators, A21-23, (1990), pp. 387-390. |
Putty, Michael W., et al., “Process Integration for Active Polysilicon Resonant Microstructures”, Sensors and Actuators, 20, (1989), pp. 143-151. |
Ravi, Kris et al., “Cement Slurry Monitoring”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/028,542, filed Feb. 16, 2011, (Aug. 16, 2012), 19 pgs. |
Samson, Etienne et al., “A Near-Field Electromagnetic Communications Network for Downhole Telemetry”, PCT Appl No. US09/53492, filed Aug. 11, 2009, 15 pgs. |
Shell, Baker Hughes, “Pioneer Real-time Compaction Imaging System”, Oil&Gas Eurasia, http://www.oilandgaseurasia.com/news/p/2/news/5146, Jun. 29, 2009, 2 pgs. |
Stiff, Henry A., et al., “A Method for Predicting the Tendency of Oil Field Waters to Deposit Calcium Carbonate”, Petroleum Transactions, AIME, vol. 195, 1952, pp. 213-216. |
Tseng, Fan-Gang et al., “Polymer MEMS-Based Fabry-Perot Shear Stress Sensor”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 3, No. 6, (Dec. 2003), pp. 812-817. |
Unknown, “Optical Activation of a Silicon Vibrating Sensor”, Electronic Letters, vol. 22, No. 21, (Oct. 9, 1986), pp. 1097-1099. |
“Search report and written opinion”, Jan. 16, 2014, PCT Appl No. PCT/US2013/024845, “Downhole System and Methods for Water Source Determination,” filed Feb. 6, 2013, 12 pgs. |
Medhat, Abdou et al., “Finding Value in Formation Water”, Oilfield Review, vol. 23, No. 1, Mar. 1, 2011, XP055095547, ISSN: 0923-1730, 12 pgs. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Dated Jun. 23, 2014, Appl No. PCT/US2013/024845, “Downhole system and methods for water source determination,” filed Feb. 6, 2013, 9 pgs. |
“AU Patent Examination Report No. 1”, dated Jun. 3, 2015, Appl No. 2013232590, “Downhole Systems and Methods for Water Source Determination,” filed Feb. 6, 2013, 4 pgs. |
“US Non Final Office Action”, dated Apr. 23, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/418,455, “Downhole Systems and Methods for Water Source Determination,” filed Mar. 13, 2012, 26 pgs. |
Dessy, Raymond E., “Waveguides as Chemical Sensors”, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 61, No. 19, Oct. 1, 1989, pp. 1079A-1094A, ACS Publications, Washington, DC, 14 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130087328 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |