Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the inventions relate to downhole steam generators.
Description of the Related Art
There are extensive viscous hydrocarbon reservoirs throughout the world. These reservoirs contain a very viscous hydrocarbon, often called “bitumen,” “tar,” “heavy oil,” or “ultra heavy oil,” (collectively referred to herein as “heavy oil”) which typically has viscosities in the range from 100 to over 1,000,000 centipoise. The high viscosity makes it difficult and expensive to recover the hydrocarbon.
Each oil reservoir is unique and responds differently to the variety of methods employed to recover the hydrocarbons therein. Generally, heating the heavy oil in situ to lower the viscosity has been employed. Normally reservoirs as viscous as these would be produced with methods such as cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), steam drive (Drive), and steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), where steam is injected from the surface into the reservoir to heat the oil and reduce its viscosity enough for production. However, some of these viscous hydrocarbon reservoirs are located under cold tundra or permafrost layers that may extend as deep as 1800 feet. Steam cannot be injected though these layers because the heat could potentially expand the permafrost, causing wellbore stability issues and significant environmental problems with melting permafrost.
Additionally, the current methods of producing heavy oil reservoirs face other limitations. One such problem is wellbore heat loss of the steam, as the steam travels from the surface to the reservoir. This problem is worsened as the depth of the reservoir increases. Similarly, the quality of steam available for injection into the reservoir also decreases with increasing depth, and the steam quality available downhole at the point of injection is much lower than that generated at the surface. This situation lowers the energy efficiency of the oil recovery process.
To address the shortcomings of injecting steam from the surface, the use of downhole steam generators (DHSG) has been used. DHSGs provide the ability to heat steam downhole, prior to injection into the reservoir. DHSGs, however, also present numerous challenges, including excessive temperatures, corrosion issues, and combustion instabilities. These challenges often result in material failures and thermal instabilities and inefficiencies.
Therefore, there is a continuous need for new and improved downhole steam generation systems and methods of recovering heavy oil using downhole steam generation.
Embodiments of the invention relate to downhole steam generator systems. In one embodiment, a downhole steam generator (DHSG) includes a burner head, a combustion sleeve, a vaporization sleeve, and a support/protection sleeve. The burner head may have a sudden expansion region with one or more injectors. The combustion sleeve may be a water-cooled liner having one or more water injection arrangements. The DHSG may be configured to acoustically isolate the various fluid flow streams that are directed to the DHSG. The components of the DHSG may be optimized to assist in the recovery of hydrocarbons from different types of reservoirs.
The burner head assembly 100 includes a cylindrical body having a lower portion 101 and an upper portion 102. The lower portion 101 may be in the form of a flange for connection with the liner assembly 200. The upper portion 102 includes a central bore 104 for supplying fluid, such as an oxidant, to the system 1000. A damping plate 105, comprising a cylindrical body having one or more flow paths formed through the body, may be disposed in the central bore 104 to acoustically isolate fluid flow to the system 1000. One or more fluid lines 111-116 may be coupled to the burner head assembly 100 for supplying various fluids to the system 1000. A support ring 103 is coupled to both the upper portion 102 and the fluid lines 111-116 to structurally support the fluid lines during operation. An igniter 150 is coupled to the lower portion 101 to ignite the fluid mixtures supplied to the burner head assembly 100. One or more recesses or cutaways 117 may be provided in the support ring 103 and the lower portion 101 to support a fluid line that couples to the liner assembly 200 as further described below.
The central bore 104 intersects a sudden expansion region 106, which is formed along the inner surface of the lower portion 101. The sudden expansion region 106 may include one or more increases in the inner diameter of the lower portion 101 relative to the inner diameter of the central bore 104. Each increase in the inner diameter of the lower portion 101 is defined as an “injection step”. As illustrated in
The first and second injection steps 107, 108 may each have one or more injectors (nozzles) 118, 119, respectively, that include fluid paths or channels formed through the lower portion 101 of the body of the burner head assembly 100. The injectors 118, 119 are configured to inject fluid, such as a fuel, into the burner head assembly 100 in a direction normal (and/or at an angle) to fluid flow through the central bore 104. The injection of fluid normal to the fluid flow through the central bore may also help produce a stable flame in the system 1000. Fluid from the injectors 118, 119 may be injected into the fluid flow through the central bore 104 at any other angle or combination of angles configured to enhance flame stability. The first injection step 107 may include eight injectors 118, and the second injection step 108 may include sixteen injectors 119. The number, size, shape, and injection angle of the injectors 118, 119 may vary depending on the operational requirements of the system 1000.
As illustrated in
The system 1000 may be configured so that the burner head assembly 100 can operate with fluid flow through the first injection step 107 only, the second injection step 108 only, or both the first and second injection steps 107, 108 simultaneously. During operation, flow through the first and/or second injection steps 107, 108 may be selectively adjusted in response to pressure, temperature, and/or flow rate changes of the system 1000 or based on the hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir characteristics, and/or to optimize flame shape, heat transfer, and combustion efficiency. The composition of fluids flowing through the first and second injection steps 107, 108 may also be selectively adjusted for the same reasons. A fluid (such as nitrogen or “reject” nitrogen provided from a pressure swing adsorption system) may be mixed with a fuel in various compositions and supplied through the burner head assembly 100 to control the operating parameters of the system 1000. Nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or other inert gases or diluents may be mixed with a fuel and supplied through the first and/or second injection steps 107, 108 to control pressure drop, flame temperature, flame stability, fluid flow rate, and/or acoustic noise developed within the system 1000, such as within the burner head assembly 100 and/or the liner assembly 200.
The system 1000 may have multiple injectors, such as injectors 118, 119 for injecting a fuel. The injectors may be selectively controlled for various operation sequences. The system 1000 may also have multiple injection steps, such as first and second injection steps 107, 108, that are operable alone or in combination with one or more of the other injection steps. Fluid flow through the injectors of each injection step may be adjusted, stopped, and/or started during operation of the system 1000. The injectors may provide a continuous operation over a range of fluid (fuel) flow rates. Discrete (steam) injection flow rates may be time-averaged to cover entire ranges of fluid flow rates.
An oxidant (oxidizer) may be supplied through the central bore 104 of the burner head assembly 100, and a fuel may be supplied through at least one of the first and second injection steps 107, 108 normal to the flow of the oxidant. The fuel and oxidant mixture may be ignited by the igniter 150 to generate a combustion flame and combustion products that are directed to the liner assembly 200. The combustion flame shape generated within the burner head assembly 100 and the liner assembly 200 may be tailored to control heat transfer to the walls of the burner head assembly 100 and the liner assembly 200 to avoid boiling of fluid and an entrained air release of bubbles.
As further illustrated in
Fluid path 132 may be in direct fluid communication with fluid path 133 via a channel (similar to channel 137 for example), and fluid path 133 may be in direct fluid communication with fluid path 134 via a channel (also similar to channel 137 for example). Fluid may circulate through fluid path 132, then through fluid path 133, and finally through fluid path 134. Fluid may flow through fluid path 132 in a first direction, about at least one of the first and second injection steps 107, 108. Fluid may flow through fluid path 133 in a second direction (opposite the first direction), about at least one of the first and second injection steps 107, 108. Fluid may flow through fluid path 134 in the first direction, about at least one of the first and second injection steps 107, 108. In this manner, the fluid paths 132, 133, 134 may be arranged to alternately direct fluid flow through the burner head assembly 100 in a first direction about the first and second injection steps 107, 108, then in a second, opposite direction, and finally in a third direction similar to the first direction. Fluid supplied through the cooling system 130 may then be returned to the surface or may be directed to cool the liner assembly 200 as further described below. One or more of the fluid lines 111-116 (illustrated in
The system 1000 may be configured with one or more types of ignition arrangements. The system 1000 may include pyrophoric and detonation wave ignition methods. The system 1000 may include multiple igniters and ignition configurations. Gas flow may also be provided through one or more igniters, such as igniter 150, for cooling purposes. The burner head assembly 100 may have an integrated igniter, such as igniter 150, which is operable with the same oxidizer and fuel used for combustion in the system 1000.
As illustrated in
The injection strut 207 may be located at various positions within the liner assembly 200 and may be shaped in various forms for fluid injection. The injection strut 207 may also be fashioned as an acoustic damper and configured to acoustically isolate fluid flow to the combustion chamber 210 (similar to the damping plate 105 in the burner head assembly 100). The body of the liner assembly 100 and/or the injection strut 207 may be in fluid communication with a source of pressurized gas, such as air supplied to the system 1000, to assist fluid flow through the liner assembly 200 and fluid injection through the injection strut 207. The system 1000 may be provided with additional cooling mechanisms to control the combustion chamber 210 temperature or flame temperature, such as direct coolant injection through the upper portion 201 of the liner assembly 200, transpiration or film cooling of the liner assembly 200 along its length, and/or ceramic coatings may be applied to reduce metal temperatures.
The system 1000 may include a twin fluid atomizing nozzle arrangement that is configured to mix or combine a gas stream and a water stream in various ways to form an atomized droplet spray that is injected into the combustion chamber 210 and/or the vaporization sleeve 300. A fluid such as water may be supplied through the fluid (feed) line 230, alone or in combination with a gas, at a high pressure to the point that the water is vaporized upon injection into the combustion chamber 210. The high pressure water may be cavitated through an orifice as it is injected into the combustion chamber 210.
The system 1000 may be configured with one or more water injection arrangements, such as the injection strut 207 and/or the injection system 220, to inject water into the burner head assembly 100, the combustion chamber 210, and/or the vaporization sleeve 300. The system 1000 may include a water injection strut connected to the body of the liner assembly 200. Water injection into the combustion chamber 210 may be provided directly from the combustion chamber wall. Injection of the water may occur at one or more locations, such as the tail end and/or the head end of the combustion chamber 210. The system 1000 may include a gas-assisted water injection arrangement. The water injection arrangements may be tailored to provide surface/wall protection and to control evaporation length. Optimization of the water injection arrangements may provide wetting of the inner surfaces/walls, achieve vaporization to a design point in a limited length, and avoid quenching of combustion flame. Fluid droplets may be injected into the combustion chamber 210 (using the fluid injection strut 207 and/or the fluid injection system 220 for example) such that the fluid droplet sizes are within a range of about 20 microns to about 100 microns, about 100 microns to about 200-300 microns, about 200-300 microns to about 500-600 microns, and about 500-600 microns to about 800 microns or greater. About 30% of the fluid droplets may have a size of about 20 microns, about 45% of the fluid droplets may have a size of about 200 microns, and about 25% of the fluid droplets may have a size of about 800 microns.
The vaporization sleeve 300 comprises a cylindrical body having an upper portion 301 in the form of a flange for connection to the liner assembly 200, and a middle or lower portion 301 that defines a vaporization chamber 310. The fluids and combustion products from the liner assembly 200 may be directed into the upper end and out of the lower end of the vaporization chamber 310 for injection into a reservoir. The vaporization chamber 310 may be of sufficient length to allow for complete combustion and/or vaporization of the fuel, oxidant, water, steam, and/or other fluids injected into the combustion chamber 210 and/or the vaporization sleeve 300 prior to injection into a reservoir.
The support sleeve 400 comprises a cylindrical body that surrounds or houses the burner head assembly 100, the liner assembly 200, and the vaporization sleeve 300 for protection from the surrounding downhole environment. The support sleeve 400 may be configured to protect the components of the system 1000 from any loads generated by its connection to other downhole devices, such as packers or umbilical connections, etc. The support sleeve 400 may protect the system 1000 components from structural damage that may be caused by thermal expansion of the system 1000 itself or the other downhole devices. The support sleeve 400 (or exoskeleton) may be configured to transmit umbilical loads around the system 1000 to a packer or other sealing/anchoring element connected to the system 1000. The system 1000 may be configured to accommodate for thermal expansion of components that are part of, connected to, or located next to the system 1000. Finally, a variety of alternative fuel, oxidant, diluent, water, and/or gas injection methods may be employed with the system 1000.
The system 1000 may be operated in a “flushing mode” to clean and prevent chemical, magnesium or calcium plugging of the various fluid (flow) paths in the system 1000 and/or the wellbore below the system 1000. One or more fluids may be supplied through the system 1000 to flush out or purge any material build up, such as coking, formed in the fluid lines, conduits, burner head assembly 100, liner assembly 200, vaporization sleeve 300, wellbore lining, and/or liner perforations.
The system 1000 may include one or more acoustic dampening features. The damping plate 105 may be located in the central bore 104 above or within the burner head assembly 100. A fluid (water) injection arrangement, such as the fluid (water) injection strut 207, may be used to acoustically isolate the combustion chamber 210 and the inner region of the vaporization sleeve 300. Nitrogen addition to the fuel may help maintain adequate pressure drop across the injectors 118, 119.
The fuel supplied to the system 1000 may be combined with one or more of the following gases: nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and gases that are non-reactive. The gas may be an inert gas. The addition of a non-reactive gas and/or inert gas with the fuel may increase flame stability when using either a “lifted flame” or “attached flame” design. The gas addition may also help maintain adequate pressure drops across the injectors 118, 119 and help maintain (fuel) injection velocity. As stated above, the gas addition may also mitigate the impact of combustion acoustics on the first and second (fuel) injection steps 107, 108 of the system 1000.
The oxidant supplied to the system 1000 may include one or more of the following gases: air, oxygen-enriched air, and oxygen mixed with an inert gas such as carbon dioxide. The system 1000 may be operable with a stoichiometric composition of oxygen or with a surplus of oxygen. The flame temperature of the system 1000 may be controlled via diluent injection. One or more diluents may be used to control flame temperature. The diluents may include water, excess oxygen, and inert gases including nitrogen, carbon dioxide, etc.
The burner head assembly 100 may be operable within an operating pressure range of about 300 psi to about 1500 psi, about 1800 psi, about 3000 psi, or greater. Water may be supplied to the system 1000 at a flow rate within a range of about 375 bpd (barrels per day) to about 1500 bpd or greater. The system 1000 may be operable to generate steam having a steam quality of about 0 percent to about 80 percent or up to 100 percent. The fuel supplied to the system 1000 may include natural gas, syngas, hydrogen, gasoline, diesel, kerosene, or other similar fuels. The oxidant supplied to the system 1000 may include air, enriched air (having about 35% oxygen), 95 percent pure oxygen, oxygen plus carbon dioxide, and/or oxygen plus other inert diluents. The exhaust gases injected into the reservoir using the system 1000 may include about 0.5 percent to about 5 percent excess oxygen. The system 1000 may be compatible with one or more packer devices of about 7 inch to about 7⅝ inch, to about 9⅝ inch sizes. The system 1000 may be dimensioned to fit within casing diameters of about 5½ inch, about 7 inch, about 7⅝ inch, and about 9⅝ inch sizes. The system 1000 may be about 8 feet in overall length. The system 1000 may be operable to generate about 1000 bpd, about 1500 bpd, and/or about 3000 bpd or greater of steam downhole. The system 1000 may be operable with a pressure turndown ratio of about 4:1, e.g. about 300 psi to about 1200 psi for example. The system 1000 may be operable with a flow rate turndown ratio of about 2:1, e.g. about 750 bpd to about 1500 bpd of steam for example. The system 1000 may include an operating life or maintenance period requirement of about 3 years or greater.
According to one method of operation, the system 1000 may be lowered into a first wellbore, such as an injection wellbore. The system 1000 may be secured in the wellbore by a securing device, such as a packer device. A fuel, an oxidant, and a fluid may be supplied to the system 1000 via one or more fluid lines and may be mixed within the burner head assembly 100. The oxidant is supplied through the central bore 104 into the sudden expansion region 106, and the fuel is injected into the sudden expansion region 106 via the injectors 118, 119 for mixture with the oxidant. The fuel and oxidant mixture may be ignited and combusted within the combustion chamber to generate one or more heated combustion products. Upon entering the sudden expansion region 106, the oxidant and/or fuel flow may form a vortex or turbulent flow that will enhance the mixing of the oxidant and fuel for a more complete combustion. The vortex or turbulent flow may also at least partially surround or enclose the combustion flame, which can assist in controlling or maintaining flame stability and size. The pressure, flow rate, and/or composition of the fuel and/or oxidant flow can be adjusted to control combustion. The fluid may be injected (in the form of atomized droplets for example) into the heated combustion products to form an exhaust gas. The fluid may include water, and the water may be vaporized by the heated combustion products to form steam in the exhaust gas. The fluid may include a gas, and the gas may be mixed and/or reacted with the heated combustion products to form the exhaust gas. The exhaust gas may be injected into a reservoir via the vaporization sleeve to heat, combust, upgrade, and/or reduce the viscosity of hydrocarbons within the reservoir. The hydrocarbons may then be recovered from a second wellbore, such as a production wellbore. The temperature and/or pressure within the reservoir may be controlled by controlling the injection of fluid and/or the production of fluid from the injection and/or production wellbores. For example, the injection rate of fluid into the reservoir may be greater than the production rate of fluid from the production wellbore. The system 1000 may be operable within any type of wellbore arrangements including one or more horizontal wells, multilateral wells, vertical wells, and/or inclined wells. The exhaust gas may comprise excess oxygen for in-situ combustion (oxidation) with the heated hydrocarbons in the reservoir. The combustion of the excess oxygen and the hydrocarbons may generate more heat within the reservoir to further heat the exhaust gas and the hydrocarbons in the reservoir, and/or to generate additional heated gas mixtures, such as with steam, within the reservoir.
The system 1000 is operable under a range of higher pressure regimes, as opposed to a conventional low-pressure regime, for example, which is managed in part to increase transfer of latent heat to the reservoir. Low pressure regimes are generally used to obtain the highest latent heat of condensation from the steam, however, most reservoirs are either shallow or have been depleted before steam is injected. A secondary purpose of low pressure regimes is to reduce heat losses to the cap rock and base rock of the reservoir because the steam is at lower temperature. However, because this heat loss takes place over many years, in some cases heat losses may actually be increased by low injection rates and longer project lengths.
The system 1000 may be operable in both low pressure regimes and high pressure regimes, and/or in onshore reservoirs at about 2,500 feet deep or greater, near-shore reservoirs, permafrost laden reservoirs, and/or reservoirs in which surface generated steam is generally uneconomic, or not viable. The system 1000 can be used in many different well configurations, including multilateral, horizontal, and vertical wells. The system 1000 is configured for the generation of high quality steam delivered at depth, injection of flue gas, N2 and CO2 for example, and higher pressure reservoir management, about 100 psig to about 1,000 psig. In one example, a reservoir which would normally operate at a low pressure regime (e.g. over 40 years) may need to be produced for only 20 years using the system 1000 to produce the same percentage of original oil in place (OOIP). Heat losses to the cap rock and base rock in the reservoir using the system 1000 are therefore also reduced by about 20 years and are far less of an issue.
The system 1000 may also play a beneficial role in low permeability formations where the gravity drainage mechanism may otherwise be impaired. Many formations have a disparity between the vertical permeability and the horizontal permeability to fluid flow. In some situations, the horizontal permeability can be orders of magnitude more than the vertical permeability. In this case, gravity drainage may be hindered and horizontal sweep by steam becomes a much more effective way of producing the oil. The system 1000 can provide the high pressure steam and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) gases that will enable this production scheme.
A summary the potential advantages between high pressure and low pressure regimes using the system 1000 are summarized in Table 1 below.
The system 1000 may be operable to inject heated N2 and/or CO2 into the reservoirs. N2 and CO2, both non-condensable gas (NCG), have relatively low specific heats and heat retention and will not stay hot very long once injected into the reservoir. At about 150 degrees Celsius, CO2 has a modest but beneficial effect on the oil properties important to production, such as specific volume and oil viscosity. Early on, the hot gasses will transfer their heat to the reservoir, which aids in oil viscosity reduction. As the gases cool, their volume will decrease, reducing likelihood of override or breakthrough. The cooled gases will become more soluble, dissolving into and swelling the oil for decreased viscosity, providing the advantages of a “cold” NCG EOR regime. NCG's reduce the partial pressure of both steam and oil, allowing for increased evaporation of both. This accelerated evaporation of water delays condensation of steam, so it condenses and transfers heat deeper in the reservoir. This results in improved heat transfer and accelerated oil production using the system 1000.
The volume of exhaust gas from the system 1000 may be less than 3 Mcf/bbl of steam, which may have enough benefit to accelerate oil production in a reservoir. When the hot gas moves ahead of the oil it will quickly cool to reservoir temperature. As it cools, the heat is transferred to the reservoir, and the gas volume decreases. As opposed to a conventional low pressure regime, the gas volume as it approaches the production well is considerably smaller, which in turn reduces the likelihood of and delays gas breakthrough. N2 and CO2 may breakthrough ahead of the steam, but at that time the gasses will be at reservoir temperature. The hot steam from the system 1000 will follow but will condense as it reaches the cool areas, transferring its heat to the reservoir, with the resultant condensate acting as a further drive mechanism for the oil. In addition, gas volume and specific gravity decrease at higher pressure (V is proportional to 1/P). Since the propensity of gas to override is limited at low gas saturation by low gas relative permeability, fingering is controlled and production of oil is accelerated.
The system 1000 may be operable with as many as 100 injection wells and/or production wells, in which oil production may be accelerated and increased. The system 1000 may be configured to optimize the experience of dozens of world-wide, high-pressure, light- and heavy-oil air-injection projects which produce very little free oxygen, less than about 0.3 percent for example. The preferential directionality of fluid flow through reservoirs may be achieved by restricting production at the production wells that are in the highest permeability regions. Gas production may be limited at each well to help sweep a wider area of the reservoir. Reservoir development planning may use gravity as an advantage where ever possible since hot gases rise and horizontal wells can be used to reduce coning and cusping of fluids in the reservoir.
The system 1000 can produce pure high quality steam with or without carbon dioxide (CO2), and with the addition of hydrogen (H2) to the fuel (methane for example) mixture (CH4+H2), which may materially increase combustion heat. The burner head assembly 100 of the system 1000 can produce high quality steam using methane/hydrogen mixtures with ratios from 100/0 percent to 0/100 percent and everything in between. The system 1000 may be adjusted as necessary to control the effect of any increased combustion heat. The reaction of hydrogen with air (or enriched air) may be about 400 degrees Fahrenheit hotter than the equivalent natural gas reaction. At stoichiometric conditions with air, the combustion products are 34 percent steam and 66 percent nitrogen (by volume) at 4000 degrees Fahrenheit. Water may be added to the operation, or without added water, superheated steam could be generated, unless a large amount of excess N2 is added as a diluent or the system 100 is operated very fuel-lean and with excess oxygen (O2). Other embodiments may include modified fuel injection parameters, and design modifications (ratios and staging of air, water and hydrogen) to mitigate the hotter flame temperatures and associated heat transfer. Corrosion could also be reduced when using hydrogen as a fuel, as essentially the only acidic product (assuming relatively pure H2 and water) would be nitric acid. Corrosion may be reduced further when using oxygen as the oxidizer. The high flame temperature may produce more NOx, but that could be reduced with staged combustion and a different water injection scheme. The reservoir production may be enhanced from strategic use of these co-injected EOR gasses together with (low or high) pressure management regimes.
The system 1000 may use CO2 or N2 as coolants or diluents for the burner head assembly 100 and/or the liner assembly 200. The combination of high quality steam at depth, the ability to manage pressure to the reservoir as a drive mechanism, and improved solubility of the introduced gas (due to the pressurized reservoir) for improved oil viscosity results in substantially accelerated oil production. In high pressure regimes enabled using the system 1000, CO2 is also beneficial even for heavy oils.
The system 1000 can be used in different well configurations, including multilateral, horizontal, and vertical wells and at reservoir depths ranging from as shallow as 0 feet to 1,000 feet, to greater than 5,000 feet. The system 1000 may provide a better economic return or internal rate of return (IRR) for a given reservoir, including permafrost-laden heavy oil resources or areas where surface steam emissions are prohibited. The system 1000 may achieve a better IRR than surface generated steam (using bare tubing or vacuum insulated tubing) due to a number of factors, including: significant reduction of steam losses otherwise incurred in surface steam generation, surface infrastructure, and in the wellbore (increasing with reservoir depth, etc.); higher production rates from higher quality, higher pressure steam injected together with reservoir-specific EOR gasses (and optionally in-situ combustion) to generate more oil, faster; and associated savings in energy costs/bbl, water usage and treatment/bbl, lower emissions, etc. The system 1000 may be operable to inject steam having a steam quality of 80% or greater at depths ranging from 0 feet to about 5000 feet and greater.
One advantage of the system 1000 is the maintenance of high pressure in the reservoir, as well as the ability to keep all gases in solution. The system 1000 can inject as much as 25 percent CO2 into the exhaust stream. With the combination of high pressure and low reservoir temperatures, the CO2 can enter into miscible conditions with the in-situ oil, thereby reducing the viscosity ahead of the steam front. Recovery factors as high as 80 percent have been seen after ten years in modeling of 330 foot spacing steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) wells plus drive wells in reservoirs containing 126,000 centipoise oil. Increasing the spacing to 660 feet may yield recovery factors of 75 percent after 22 years.
The system 1000 may work with geothermal wells, fireflooding, flue gas injection, H2S and chloride stress corrosion cracking, etc. The system 1000 may include a combination of specialized equipment features together with suitable metallurgies and where necessary use of corrosion inhibitors. Corrosion at the production wells can be controlled in high-pressure-air injection projects by the addition of corrosion inhibitors at the producers.
The system 1000 may be operable at relatively high pressures, greater than 1,200 psi in relatively shallow reservoirs, assuming standard operating considerations such as fracture gradients, etc. To achieve the high pressure in shallow reservoirs, throttling the production well outlet may be required to obtain the desired backpressure.
The system 1000 may be operable using clean water (drinking water standards or above) and/or brine as a feedwater source, while avoiding potential issues from scaling, heavy metals, etc. within the system 1000 and in the reservoir.
The system 1000 may be operable to maintain higher reservoir pressures that offset the lower temperature of steam mixed with NCGs. The addition of NCG to steam will lower the temperature at which the steam condenses at higher pressures by 50-60 degrees Fahrenheit because the partial pressure of water is lower. Therefore, the steam temperature in the system 1000 is approximately the same as the steam temperature in a lower pressure regime without NCG. The temperature is lowered, but the steam does not condense as easily. Additionally the partial pressure of oil is lowered and more oil evaporates as well. Both of these help increase oil recovery. Additionally, the presence of gases helps to swell the oil, forcing some oil out from the pore spaces and again increasing recovery. By operating the system 1000 and the reservoir at a high pressure you can combine the benefits of miscible flooding in the cooler parts of the reservoir with steam flood following after. Also, by operating at a high pressure there are two mechanisms to reduce the viscosity of heavy oil. The first, which accelerates oil production, is higher Gas-Oil-Ratios and lower oil viscosity at temperatures up to approximately 150 degrees Celsius. The second is the traditional reduction in oil viscosity at higher temperature.
A method of recovering hydrocarbons from a reservoir comprises supplying a fuel, an oxidant, and a fluid to a downhole system; flowing water to the system at a flow rate within a range of about 375 barrels per day to about 1500 barrels per day; combusting the fuel, oxidant, and water to form steam having about an 80 percent water vapor fraction; maintaining a combustion temperature within a range of about 3000 degrees Fahrenheit to about 5000 degrees Fahrenheit; maintaining a combustion pressure within a range of about 300 PSI to about 2000 PSI; and maintaining a fuel injection pressure drop in the system above 10 percent.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be implemented without departing from the scope of the invention, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/042,075, filed Mar. 7, 2011, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/311,619, filed Mar. 8, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/436,472, filed Jan. 26, 2011, each of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1948940 | Noack | Feb 1934 | A |
3055427 | Pryor | Sep 1962 | A |
3074469 | Babbitt et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3315745 | Rees, Jr. | Apr 1967 | A |
3456721 | Smith | Jul 1969 | A |
3700035 | Lange | Oct 1972 | A |
3980137 | Gray | Sep 1976 | A |
3982591 | Hamrick et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3982592 | Hamrick et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4024912 | Hamrick et al. | May 1977 | A |
4050515 | Hamrick et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4053015 | Hamrick | Oct 1977 | A |
4077469 | Hamrick et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4078613 | Hamrick et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4118925 | Sperry et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4159743 | Rose et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4199024 | Rose et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4244684 | Sperry et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4336839 | Wagner et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4366860 | Donaldson et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4380267 | Fox | Apr 1983 | A |
4385661 | Fox | May 1983 | A |
4397356 | Retallick | Aug 1983 | A |
4411618 | Donaldson et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4421163 | Tuttle | Dec 1983 | A |
4442898 | Wyatt | Apr 1984 | A |
4456068 | Burrill, Jr. et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4459101 | Doherty | Jul 1984 | A |
4463803 | Wyatt | Aug 1984 | A |
4475883 | Schirmer et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4498531 | Vrolyk | Feb 1985 | A |
4498542 | Eisenhawer et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4558743 | Ryan et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4597441 | Ware et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604988 | Rao | Aug 1986 | A |
4648835 | Eisenhawer et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4678039 | Rivas et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4682471 | Wagner | Jul 1987 | A |
4691771 | Ware et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4706751 | Gondouin | Nov 1987 | A |
4765406 | Frohling et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4785748 | Sujata et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4860827 | Lee et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4861263 | Schirmer | Aug 1989 | A |
4865130 | Ware et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4930454 | Latty et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5055030 | Schirmer | Oct 1991 | A |
5163511 | Amundson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5319935 | Toon | Jun 1994 | A |
5412981 | Myers et al. | May 1995 | A |
5488990 | Wadleigh et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5623576 | Deans | Apr 1997 | A |
5802854 | Maeda | Sep 1998 | A |
5832999 | Ellwood | Nov 1998 | A |
5862858 | Wellington et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5899269 | Wellington et al. | May 1999 | A |
6016867 | Gregoli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016868 | Gregoli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019172 | Wellington et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6070411 | Iwai | Jun 2000 | A |
6269882 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6328104 | Graue | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6358040 | Pfefferle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6394791 | Smith et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6752623 | Smith et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6973968 | Pfefferle | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7090013 | Wellington | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114566 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7341102 | Kresnyak et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343971 | Pfefferle | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7497253 | Retallick et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7712528 | Langdon et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7770646 | Klassen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8091625 | Ware et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8387692 | Tilmont | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8613316 | Castrogiovanni et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20030175082 | Liebert et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050026094 | Sanmiguel | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050080312 | Reinhardt | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050239661 | Pfefferle | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060042794 | Pfefferle | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060142149 | Ma et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060162923 | Ware | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060254956 | Khan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289157 | Rao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070202452 | Rao | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202453 | Knoepfel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080078552 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080217008 | Langdon | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20110036095 | Krajicek | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110036575 | Cavender et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110127036 | Tilmont et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130140027 | Tilmont | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130344448 | Tilmont | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140034302 | McGuffin | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201180023206.0, dated Jul. 3, 2014. |
V Graifer, et al., Bottom-hole Formation Zone Treatment Using Monofuel Thermolysis, SPE 138077, 2010 Russian Oil & Gas Technical Conferenceand Exhibition held in Moscow, Russia on Oct. 26-Oct. 28, 2010, 3 Pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/027398 dated Sep. 14, 2011. |
Richard Puster, Marco Egoavil, Peyton Gregory and Davood Moslemian, A Gas Turbine Combustor With a Double Step Combustor and a Captured Vortex Chamber, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA-2009-1251, 2009. |
Canadian Office Action for Application No. 2,792,597 dated Jan. 2, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140238680 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61311619 | Mar 2010 | US | |
61436472 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13042075 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 14137169 | US |