The subject matter of this application is related to the subject matter of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/491,246, filed Sep. 19, 2014, and titled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DOWNHOLE PROPELLANT-BASED STIMULATION WITH WELLBORE PRESSURE CONTAINMENT, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/781,217 by the inventors herein, filed Feb. 28, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,447,672, issued Sep. 20, 2016, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
Embodiments of the disclosure relate generally to the use of propellants for downhole applications. More particularly, embodiments of the disclosure relate to propellant-based apparatuses for stimulating a producing formation intersected by a wellbore, and to related methods of stimulating a producing formation.
Conventional propellant-based downhole stimulation tools typically employ a right circular cylinder of a single type of propellant, which may comprise a single volume or a plurality of propellant “sticks” in an outer housing. Upon deploying such a downhole stimulation tool into a wellbore adjacent a producing formation, a detonation cord extending through an axially-extending hole in the propellant grain is typically initiated and high pressure gases generated from the combusting propellant grain exit the outer housing at select locations, entering the producing formation. The high pressure gases may be employed to fracture the producing formation, to perforate the producing formation (e.g., when spatially directed through apertures in the housing against the wellbore wall), and/or to clean existing fractures formed in the producing formation by other techniques, any of the foregoing increasing the effective surface area of the producing formation available for production of hydrocarbons.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,565,930, 7,950,457 and 8,186,435 to Seekford, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference, propose a technique to alter an initial surface area for propellant burning, but this technique cannot provide a full regime of potentially available ballistics for propellant-induced stimulation in a downhole environment. It would be desirable to provide enhanced control of not only the initial surface area (which alters the initial rise rate of the gas pulse, or dP/dt, responsive to propellant ignition), but also the duration and shape of the remainder of the pressure pulse introduced by the burning propellant.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/781,217 by the inventors herein, filed Feb. 28, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,447,672, issued Sep. 20, 2016, and assigned to the Assignee of the present disclosure, addresses many of the issues noted above and left untouched by Seekford.
Unfortunately, the configurations of conventional propellant-based downhole stimulation tools offer limited to no means of controllably varying the pressure within a producing formation over an extended period of time (e.g., a period of time greater than or equal to about 1 second, such as greater than or equal to about 5 seconds, greater than or equal to about 10 seconds, greater than or equal to about 20 seconds, or greater than or equal to about 60 seconds).
It would, therefore, be desirable to have new downhole stimulation tools and methods of stimulating a producing formation, which facilitate controllably varying the pressure within the producing formation over an extended period of time. In addition, it would be desirable if the downhole stimulation tools and components thereof were easy to fabricate and assemble, exhibited nominal movement within a wellbore during use and operation, and were at least partially reusable.
In some embodiments, a downhole stimulation tool comprises an outer housing exhibiting apertures extending therethrough, opposing propellant structures within the outer housing, and at least one initiator adjacent each of the opposing propellant structures. Each of the opposing propellant structures comprise at least one higher combustion rate propellant region, and at least one lower combustion rate propellant region adjacent the at least one higher combustion rate propellant region.
In additional embodiments, a downhole stimulation tool comprises an outer housing exhibiting apertures extending therethrough, a propellant structure within the outer housing, another propellant structure opposing the first propellant structure within the outer housing, and initiators adjacent each of the propellant structure and the another propellant structure. The propellant structure comprises at least one higher combustion rate propellant region, and at least one lower combustion rate propellant region adjacent the at least one higher combustion rate region. The another propellant structure comprises at least one other higher combustion rate propellant region, and at least one other lower combustion rate propellant region adjacent the at least one other higher combustion rate propellant region.
In further embodiments, a method of stimulating a producing formation comprises positioning a downhole stimulation tool within a wellbore intersecting the producing formation, the downhole stimulation tool comprising an outer housing exhibiting apertures extending therethrough, opposing propellant structures within the outer housing, and at least one initiator adjacent each of the opposing propellant structures. Each of the opposing propellant structures comprises at least one higher combustion rate propellant region, and at least one higher lower combustion rate propellant region adjacent the at least one higher combustion rate propellant region. The opposing propellant structures are each initiated to combust the opposing propellant structures and vent produced combustion gases through the apertures in the outer housing to increase pressure adjacent to and within the producing formation.
Downhole stimulation tools are disclosed, as are methods of stimulating producing formations. As used herein, the term “producing formation” means and includes, without limitation, any subterranean formation having the potential for producing hydrocarbons in the form of oil, natural gas, or both, as well as any subterranean formation suitable for use in geothermal heating, cooling and power generation. In some embodiments, a downhole stimulation tool may be formed of and include an outer housing exhibiting apertures extending circumferentially through a wall thereof, opposing propellant structures within the outer housing flanking the apertures, and at least one initiator adjacent each of the opposing propellant structures. Each of the opposing propellant structures may be formed of and include at least one relatively higher combustion rate region and at least one relatively lower combustion rate region adjacent the at least one relatively higher combustion rate region. The downhole stimulation tools and methods of the disclosure may provide increased control of a pressure profile to be applied within the producing formation proximate the downhole stimulation tools over an extended period of time relative to conventional downhole stimulation tools and methods, facilating the simple, cost-effective, and enhanced stimulation of a producing formation as compared to conventional downhole stimulation tools and methods.
The following description provides specific details, such as material types, material dimensions, and processing conditions in order to provide a thorough description of embodiments of the disclosure. However, a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced without employing these specific details. Indeed, the embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced in conjunction with conventional techniques employed in the industry. Only those process acts and structures necessary to understand the embodiments of the disclosure are described in detail below. Additional acts to form a downhole stimulation tool of the disclosure may be performed by conventional techniques, which are not described in detail herein. Also, the drawings accompanying the application are for illustrative purposes only, and are thus not drawn to scale. Additionally, elements common between figures may retain the same numerical designation.
As used herein, the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” “characterized by,” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive or open-ended terms that do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method acts, but also include the more restrictive terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” and grammatical equivalents thereof. As used herein, the term “may” with respect to a material, structure, feature or method act indicates that such is contemplated for use in implementation of an embodiment of the disclosure and such term is used in preference to the more restrictive term “is” so as to avoid any implication that other, compatible materials, structures, features and methods usable in combination therewith should or must be, excluded.
As used herein, the term “configured” refers to a size, shape, material composition, and arrangement of one or more of at least one structure and at least one apparatus facilitating operation of one or more of the structure and the apparatus in a pre-determined way.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
As used herein, “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
As used herein, relational terms, such as “first,” “second,” “over,” “top,” “bottom,” “underlying,” etc., are used for clarity and convenience in understanding the disclosure and accompanying drawings and does not connote or depend on any specific preference, orientation, or order, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise.
As used herein, the term “substantially” in reference to a given parameter, property, or condition means and includes to a degree that one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the given parameter, property, or condition is met with a degree of variance, such as within acceptable manufacturing tolerances. By way of example, depending on the particular parameter, property, or condition that is substantially met, the parameter, property, or condition may be at least 90.0% met, at least 95.0% met, at least 99.0% met, or even at least 99.9% met.
As used herein, the term “about” in reference to a given parameter is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., it includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the given parameter).
The outer housing 101 may comprise any structure configured to contain (e.g., house, hold, etc.) the opposing propellant structures 102 and the initiators 104, and also configured to vent gases produced during combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102. For example, as shown in
The outer housing 101 may comprise a single, substantially monolithic structure, or may comprise a plurality of connected (e.g., attached, coupled, bonded, etc.) structures. As used herein, the term “monolithic structure” means and includes a structure formed as, and comprising a single, unitary structure of a material. In some embodiments, the outer housing 101 is formed of and includes a plurality of connected structures (e.g., segments). By way of non-limiting example, the outer housing 101 may be formed of and include a first structure operatively associated with and configured to at least partially contain the opposing propellant structures 102, a second structure operatively associated with and configured to at least partially contain the second propellant structure 104, and a third structure interposed between and connected to each of the first structure and the second structure and exhibiting at least a portion of the apertures 110 therein. Forming the outer housing 101 from a plurality of connected structures may permit at least some of the connected structures to be reused following the use of the downhole stimulation tool 100 to stimulate of a producing formation in a wellbore. The plurality of connected structures may be coupled to one another using conventional processes and equipment, which are not described in detail herein.
The outer housing 101 may exhibit any configuration of the apertures 110 sufficient to vent gases produced during use and operation of the downhole stimulation tool 100, and also sufficient to at least partially (e.g., substantially) maintain the structural integrity of the outer housing 101 during the use and operation of the downhole stimulation tool 100. The position, quantity, dimensions (e.g., size and shape), and spacing (e.g., separation) of the apertures 110 may at least partially depend on the configurations and methods of initiating and combusting (e.g., burning) the opposing propellant structures 102. As depicted in
Each of the opposing propellant structures 102 may comprise a composite structure formed of and including at least two regions exhibiting mutually different propellants. For example, as shown in
While various embodiments herein describe or illustrate the opposing propellant structures 102 as being formed of and including higher combustion rate regions 102a each exhibiting a first combustion rate, and lower combustion rate regions 102b each exhibiting a second, lower combustion rate, the opposing propellant structures 102 may, alternatively, each be formed of and include at least one additional region exhibiting at least one different combustion rate than both the higher combustion rate regions 102a and the lower combustion rate regions 102b. For example, each of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be formed of and include at least three regions each exhibiting a mutually different combustion rate and each comprising a mutually different propellant, at least four regions each exhibiting a mutually different combustion rate and each comprising a mutually different propellant, or more than four regions each exhibiting a mutually different combustion rate and each comprising a mutually different propellant.
The opposing propellant structures 102 may be formed of and include any desired quantity (e.g., number) and sequence (e.g., pattern) of the higher combustion rate regions 102a and the lower combustion rate regions 102b facilitating the stimulation of a producing formation in a wellbore in a pre-determined way, as described in further detail below. By way of non-limiting example, as shown in
While various embodiments herein describe or illustrate the opposing propellant structures 102 as each being formed of and including multiple (e.g., a plurality of) higher combustion rate regions 102a and multiple lower combustion rate regions 102b in an alternating sequence with one another beginning with one of the higher combustion rate regions 102a at a location proximate the lateral axis 112 of the outer housing 101, each of the opposing propellant structures 102 may, alternatively, be formed of and include at least one of a different quantity and a different sequence of the higher combustion rate regions 102a and the lower combustion rate regions 102b. For example, each of the opposing propellant structures 102 may include a single higher combustion rate region 102a and multiple lower combustion rate regions 102b, or each of the opposing propellant structures 102 may include multiple higher combustion rate regions 102a and a single lower combustion rate region 102b. As another example, each of the opposing propellant structures 102 may exhibit an alternating sequence of the higher combustion rate regions 102a and the lower combustion rate regions 102b beginning with one of the lower combustion rate regions 102b at a location proximate the lateral axis 112 of the outer housing 101. The quantity and the sequence of the higher combustion rate regions 102a and the lower combustion rate regions 102b may at least partially depend on the material composition of the producing formation to be stimulated, as well as downhole pressure and temperature in a wellbore adjacent such a producing formation, as described in further detail below.
Propellants of the opposing propellant structures 102 (e.g., propellant(s) of the higher combustion rate regions 102a, and propellant(s) of the lower combustion rate regions 102b) suitable for implementation of embodiments of the disclosure may include, without limitation, materials used as solid rocket motor propellants. Various examples of such propellants and components thereof are described in Thakre et al., Solid Propellants, Rocket Propulsion, Volume 2, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2010, the disclosure of which document is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference. The propellants may be class 4.1, 1.4 or 1.3 materials, as defined by the United States Department of Transportation shipping classification, so that transportation restrictions are minimized.
By way of non-limiting example, the propellants of the opposing propellant structures 102 may each independently be formed of and include a polymer having at least one of a fuel and an oxidizer incorporated therein. The polymer may be an energetic polymer or a non-energetic polymer, such as glycidyl nitrate (GLYN), nitratomethylmethyloxetane (NMMO), glycidyl azide (GAP), diethyleneglycol triethyleneglycol nitraminodiacetic acid terpolymer (9DT-NIDA), bis(azidomethyl)-oxetane (BAMO), azidomethylmethyl-oxetane (AMMO), nitraminomethyl methyloxetane (NAMMO), bis(difluoroaminomethyl)oxetane (BFMO), difluoroaminomethylmethyloxetane (DFMO), copolymers thereof, cellulose acetate, cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB), nitrocellulose, polyamide (nylon), polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polycarbonate, a polyacrylate, a wax, a hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), a hydroxyl-terminated poly-ether (HTPE), carboxyl-terminated polybutadiene (CTPB) and carboxyl-terminated polyether (CTPE), diaminoazoxy furazan (DAAF), 2,6-bis(picrylamino)-3,5-dinitropyridine (PYX), a polybutadiene acrylonitrile/acrylic acid copolymer binder (PBAN), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ethylmethacrylate, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), a fluoropolymer, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), or combinations thereof. The polymer may function as a binder, within which the at least one of the fuel and oxidizer is dispersed. The fuel may be a metal, such as aluminum, nickel, magnesium, silicon, boron, beryllium, zirconium, hafnium, zinc, tungsten, molybdenum, copper, or titanium, or alloys mixtures or compounds thereof, such as aluminum hydride (AlH3), magnesium hydride (MgH2), or borane compounds (BH3). The metal may be used in powder form. The oxidizer may be an inorganic perchlorate, such as ammonium perchlorate or potassium perchlorate, or an inorganic nitrate, such as ammonium nitrate or potassium nitrate. Other oxidizers may also be used, such as hydroxylammonium nitrate (HAN), ammonium dinitramide (ADN), hydrazinium nitroformate, a nitramine, such as cyclotetramethylene tetranitramine (HMX), cyclotrimethylene trinitramine (RDX), 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20 or HNIW), and/or 4,10-dinitro-2,6,8,12-tetraoxa-4,10-diazatetracyclo-[5.5.0.05,9.03,11]-dodecane (TEX). In addition, one or more of the propellants of the opposing propellant structures 102 may include additional components, such as at least one of a plasticizer, a bonding agent, a combustion rate modifier, a ballistic modifier, a cure catalyst, an antioxidant, and a pot life extender, depending on the desired properties of the propellant. These additional components are well known in the rocket motor art and, therefore, are not described in detail herein. The components of the propellants of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be combined by conventional techniques, which are not described in detail herein.
Each of the regions of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be substantially homogeneous. For example, each of the higher combustion rate regions 102a may be formed of and include a single propellant, and each of the lower combustion rate regions 102b may be formed of and include a single, different propellant. In additional embodiments, one or more of the regions of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be heterogeneous. For example, one or more of the higher combustion rate regions 102a and/or the lower combustion rate regions 102b may comprise a composite structure formed of and including a volume of one propellant at least partially surrounded by a volume of another, different propellant, such as one or more of the composite structures described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/781,217, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,447,672, issued Sep. 20, 2016, the disclosure of which was previously incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
Regions of the opposing propellant structures 102 exhibiting substantially the same combustion rate (e.g., each of the higher combustion rate regions 102a, each of the lower combustion rate regions 102b, etc.) may each be formed of and include substantially the same propellant, or at least one of the regions exhibiting substantially the same combustion rate may be formed of and include a different propellant than at least one other of the regions exhibiting substantially the same combustion rate. For example, each of the higher combustion rate regions 102a of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be formed of and include substantially the same propellant, or at least one of the higher combustion rate regions 102a may be formed of and include a different propellant than at least one other of the higher combustion rate regions 102a. As another example, each of the lower combustion rate regions 102b of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be formed of and include substantially the same propellant, or at least one of the lower combustion rate regions 102b may be formed of and include a different propellant than at least one other of the lower combustion rate regions 102b.
Each of the regions of the opposing propellant structures 102 (e.g., each of the higher combustion rate regions 102a, each of the lower combustion rate regions 102b, etc.) may exhibit substantially the same volume of propellant, or at least one of the regions of the opposing propellant structures 102 may exhibit a different volume of propellant than at least one other of the regions of the opposing propellant structures 102. For example, each of the higher combustion rate regions 102a of the opposing propellant structures 102 may exhibit substantially the same volume of propellant, or at least one of the higher combustion rate regions 102a may exhibit a different volume of propellant than at least one other of the higher combustion rate regions 102a. As another example, each of the lower combustion rate regions 102b of the opposing propellant structures 102 may exhibit substantially the same volume of propellant, or at least one of the lower combustion rate regions 102b may exhibit a different volume of propellant than at least one other of the lower combustion rate regions 102b. The volumes selected for the different regions of the opposing propellant structures 102 may at least partially depend on the material composition of the producing formation to be stimulated, as described in further detail below.
As shown in
The configurations of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be selected (e.g., tailored) to substantially minimize, and desirably prevent, movement of the downhole stimulation tool 100 during stimulation of a producing formation in a wellbore. For example, the configuration of one of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be selected relative to the configuration of the other of opposing propellant structures 102 such that the downhole stimulation tool 100 exhibits substantially neutral thrust (e.g., neither forward (downward) thrust, nor reverse (upward) thrust within the wellbore in which the downhole stimulation tool 100 is deployed) during combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102. The one of the opposing propellant structures 102 may produce thrust in one direction and the other of the opposing propellant structures 102 may produce substantially the same amount of thrust in an opposing direction, such that the downhole stimulation tool 100 exhibits substantially no movement during stimulation of a producing formation in a wellbore. In additional embodiments, the configurations of the opposing propellant structures 102 may result in some movement of the downhole stimulation tool 100 during stimulation of a producing formation in a wellbore. For example, the differences in one or more of the dimensions, positions, propellants, propellant regions, propellant region combustion rates, propellant region sequences, and propellant region volumes of the opposing propellant structures 102 may cause the downhole stimulation tool 100 to exhibit some forward thrust and/or some reverse thrust during combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102. At least in such embodiments, one or more anchoring systems may, optionally, be employed to substantially limit undesired movement of the downhole stimulation tool 100 during stimulation of a producing formation in a wellbore. For example, if the configurations of the opposing propellant structures 102 would result in movement of the downhole stimulation tool 100 during combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102, at least one anchoring system may be utilized with the downhole stimulation tool 100 to substantially mitigate or prevent such movement of the downhole stimulation tool 100. Suitable anchoring systems are well known in the art, and are therefore not described in detail herein.
In addition, the configurations of the opposing propellant structures 102 may be selected based on a material composition of the producing formation to be stimulated by the downhole stimulation tool 100. For example, the opposing propellant structures 102 may be configured to achieve a pre-determined pressure profile (e.g., pressure trace, pressure curve), which pressure profile may also be characterized as a ballistic trace, within a producing formation during the use and operation of the downhole stimulation tool 100, the selected pressure profile at least partially determined by the geologic strata of the producing formation. The opposing propellant structures 102 may be configured to generate controlled variances in pressure (e.g., increased pressure, decreased pressure) and durations of such variances of pressure within the producing formation during the combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102. By way of non-limiting example, a pressure level within the producing formation may increase (e.g., rise) when the higher combustion rate regions 102a begin to combust, and may decrease (e.g., drop) during the combustion of the lower combustion rate regions 102b. Of course, after initial propellant burn has commenced and pressure is elevated above hydrostatic wellbore pressure, such increases and decreases in pressure, and durations of such variances, may be effected relative to a baseline elevated pressure above hydrostatic.
In one example of a tailored, non-uniform pressure profile that may be termed a “sawtooth” profile, and as illustrated graphically in
Various configurations of the opposing propellant structures 102 for various producing formation material compositions may be selected and produced using mathematical modeling. The mathematical modeling may be based upon ballistics codes for solid rocket motors but adapted for physics (i.e., pressure and temperature conditions) experienced downhole, as well as for the presence of apertures for gas from combusting opposing propellant structures 102 to exit an outer housing. The ballistics codes may be extrapolated with a substantially time-driven combustion rate. Of course, the codes may be further refined over time by correlation to multiple iterations of empirical data obtained in physical testing under simulated downhole environments and actual downhole operations. Such modeling has been conducted with regard to conventional downhole propellants in academia and industry as employed in conventional configurations. An example of software for such modeling may include P
Referring collectively to
The opposing propellant structures 102 may each be formed using conventional processes and conventional equipment, which are not described in detail herein. By way of non-limiting example, different regions of the opposing propellant structures 102 (e.g., the higher combustion rate regions 102a, the lower combustion rate regions 102b, etc.) may be conventionally cast, conventionally extruded, and/or conventionally machined from selected propellants to a substantially common diameter, and then arranged longitudinally relative to one another and placed within outer housing 101 to form the opposing propellant structures 102. In some embodiments, the opposing propellant structures may be preassembled prior to transport to a rig site of a wellbore of a producing formation to be stimulated. In additional embodiments, the opposing propellant structures 102 may be readily assembled at the rig site of a wellbore in a producing formation from multiple, pre-formed propellant structures transported to the rig site, and selected and configured based on the pre-determined (e.g., by way of mathematical modeling, previous experience, or combinations thereof) stimulation needs of the producing formation. The opposing propellant structures 102 may also be produced in the field by severing selected lengths of propellant grains of particular types from longer propellant grains and then assembling the selected lengths of the propellant grains relative to one another.
Optionally, at least one of a heat insulator, a combustion inhibitor, and a liner may be interposed between the outer housing 101 and each of the opposing propellant structures 102. The heat insulator may be configured and positioned to protect (e.g., shield) the outer housing 101 from damage associated with the high temperatures and high velocity particles produced during combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102. The combustion inhibitor may be configured and positioned to thermally protect and at least partially control the ignition and combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102, including the different regions thereof (e.g., the higher combustion rate regions 102a, the lower combustion rate regions 102b, etc.). The liner may be configured and positioned to bond (e.g., directly bond, indirectly bond) the opposing propellant structures 102 to at least one of the heat insulating layer and the outer housing 101. The liner may also be configured to prevent, by substantially limiting, interactions between the opposing propellant structures 102 and wellbore fluids during use and operation of the downhole stimulation tool 100. The liner may, for example, prevent leaching of the propellants of the opposing propellant structures 102 into the downhole environment during use and operation of the downhole stimulation tool 100. In some embodiments, the heat insulator is formed (e.g., coated, applied, etc.) on or over an inner surface of the outer housing 101, the combustion inhibitor is formed (e.g., coated, applied, etc.) on or over peripheral surfaces of the opposing propellant structures 102, and the liner is formed on or over the combustion inhibitor layer. Suitable heat insulators, suitable combustion inhibitors, and suitable liners, and as well as a process of forming the heat insulating layers, the combustion inhibitors, and the liners, and are known in the art, and therefore are not described in detail herein. In some embodiments, the combustion inhibitor comprises substantially the same polymer as a polymer of at least one propellant of the opposing propellant structures 102 (e.g., PVC if a propellant of the opposing propellant structures 102 is formed of includes PVC, etc.), and the liner comprises at least one of an epoxy, a urethane, a cyanoacrylate, a fluoroelastomer, mica, and graphite, such as the materials described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,565,930, 7,950,457 and 8,186,435 to Seekford, the disclosure of each of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
Referring again to
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that, in accordance with additional embodiments of the disclosure, the initiators 104 may be provided at different locations on, over, and/or within the opposing propellant structures 102 of the downhole stimulation tool 100. By way of non-limiting example,
As shown in
The outer housing 101′ of the downhole stimulation tool 100′ may include an additional number of the apertures 110 to account for the additional combustion fronts that may be formed on the opposing propellant structures 102 through activation of multiple initiators 104. The outer housing 101′ may include any position, quantity, dimensions (e.g., size and shape), and spacing (e.g., separation) of the additional number of the apertures 110 sufficient to vent the gases produced during the combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102, and also sufficient to at least partially (e.g., substantially) maintain the structural integrity of the outer housing 101′ during the use and operation of the downhole stimulation tool 100′. For example, as shown in
In addition, in accordance with further embodiments of the disclosure, the initiators 104 may be provided at additional, different locations within the downhole stimulation tool 100′. By way of non-limiting example,
As shown in
The outer housing 101″ of the downhole stimulation tool 100″ may include an additional number of the apertures 110 to account for the additional combustion fronts that may be formed on the opposing propellant structures 102″ through activation of multiple initiators 104. The outer housing 101″ may include any position, quantity, dimensions (e.g., size and shape), and spacing (e.g., separation) of the additional number of the apertures 110 sufficient to vent the gases produced during the combustion of the opposing propellant structures 102″, and also sufficient to at least partially (e.g., substantially) maintain the structural integrity of the outer housing 101″ during the use and operation of the downhole stimulation tool 100″. As shown in
With continued reference to
Unlike conventional propellant-based stimulation techniques, embodiments of the disclosure enable generation and prolonged maintenance of a number of elevated pressures in a wellbore in communication with a producing formation for an extended duration. The ability to control levels, timing and durations of individual segments of a prolonged pressure pulse enables stimulation to be tailored to known parameters of a producing formation to be stimulated, such parameters being previously empirically determined by, for example, logging and/or coring operations, or known from completion of other wells intersecting the same producing formation. Thus, embodiments of the disclosure may enable stimulation of a producing formation over an extended period of time (e.g., a period of time greater than or equal to about 1 second, such as greater than or equal to about 5 seconds, greater than or equal to about 10 seconds, greater than or equal to about 20 seconds, or greater than or equal to about 60 seconds), which may be of benefit to enhance production of desired formation fluids from producing formations in various different geologic strata through improved fracturing, acidizing, cleaning and other stimulation techniques. Development and maintenance of an extended duration, multi-pressure pulse is enabled by the use of elongated propellant structures according to embodiments of the disclosure in the form of multiple propellant regions exhibiting a limited combustion front in the form of transverse cross-sections of the various regions as each region burns longitudinally within the outer housing.
Embodiments of the disclosure may be used to provide virtually infinite flexibility to tailor a pressure profile resulting from propellant combustion within a downhole environment to match particular requirements for stimulating a producing formation for maximum efficacy. For example, the configurations according to embodiments of the disclosure (e.g., the downhole stimulations tools 100, 100′, 100″ shown in
While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, the disclosure is not limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the disclosure as defined by the following appended claims and their legal equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2921519 | Martin | Jan 1960 | A |
3090436 | Briggs, Jr. | May 1963 | A |
3266575 | Owen | Aug 1966 | A |
3422760 | Mohaupt | Jan 1969 | A |
3602304 | Mallinger et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3677010 | Fink et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
4253523 | Ibsen | Mar 1981 | A |
4391337 | Ford et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4633951 | Hill et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4729317 | Burdette et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4798244 | Trost | Jan 1989 | A |
4823875 | Hill | Apr 1989 | A |
4840231 | Berzin | Jun 1989 | A |
5230287 | Arrell, Jr. et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5431101 | Arrell, Jr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5626360 | Lauritzen et al. | May 1997 | A |
6082450 | Snider et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6263283 | Snider et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6817298 | Zharkov et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7073589 | Tiernan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7097203 | Burns et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7353866 | Snider et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7431075 | Brooks | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7487827 | Tiernan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7565930 | Seekford | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7789153 | Prinz et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7810569 | Hill et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861785 | Frazier et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7909096 | Clark et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7950457 | Seekford | May 2011 | B2 |
8033333 | Frazier et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8186425 | Smart et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8186435 | Seekford | May 2012 | B2 |
20030155112 | Tiernan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050109509 | Snider et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060048664 | Tiernan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20080099204 | Arrell | May 2008 | A1 |
20080314591 | Hales et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090078427 | Patel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090159285 | Goodman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090301721 | Barykin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120138302 | Stehle | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150515 | Hariharan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20140238678 | Arrell, Jr. et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150267501 | Al-gouhi | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150275643 | Holder | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, ISA/KR, International Application No. PCT/US2014/017064, Jun. 23, 2014, three (3) pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, ISA/KR, International Application No. PCT/US2014/017064, Jun. 23, 2014, 12 pages. |
Schatz, John, “PulsFrac™ Summary Technical Description,” John F. Schatz Research & Consulting, Inc., Del Mar, CA, (2003), pp. 1-8. |
Thakre et al., “Solid Propellants,” Rocket Propulsion, vol. 2, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, LTD., (2010), pp. 1-10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160084055 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |