Patent Grant
6843320
The present invention relates to downhole tools, such as a perforating gun, used in hydrocarbon recovery operations to perforate a well. More particularly, this invention relates to a downhole tool with a rotating swivel orientable in the well.
Perforating guns have been used for decades to perforate either a cased hole at a desired depth, or to perforate an open hole. In some applications, the perforating gun simply needs to be at the correct depth for the gun to be fired and the well desirably perforated. In other applications, however, the perforating charges located on the perforating gun must be oriented in a desired direction prior to detonation. It is a requirement that the gun be properly oriented prior to detonation in hydraulically fractured wells, and also to electrically sensored or “smart” wells. When hydraulically fracturing a well, injection pressure may be reduced and the flow rates increased if the perforating holes for receiving the charges are correctly aligned with the direction of principal maximum stress. For smart wells, it is important that the gun be properly oriented so that perforating does not injure or destroy the electronic sensors and/or communication lines in the well.
The use of perforating guns in a well has historically also involved the use of a bow spring decentralizer, decentralizing magnets, or offset weight devices. A weight selectively placed on one side of the gun should result in the gun being properly oriented by the weight device against the low side of the well. Decentralizers and decentralizing magnets employ their own system for trying to position a particular side of the gun against the low side of the well. All these devices become less effective when the well has a low angle from vertical. Many systems currently require the well operator to perform an orienting run prior to firing the perforating gun, so that the orientation of the gun with respect to the zone to be perforated may be determined for the run, then this information used to offset the gun to the desired orientation within the well. Orienting runs are commonly analyzed in conjunction with known well survey data in order to provide the required orientation of the gun in a well. These systems incur high costs due to the guidance packages, take valuable time for obtaining the relevant data then orienting the tool in response to that data, then firing the guns. In many applications, the orientation of the gun is “rechecked” by another run after the data has been initially obtained and the tool hopefully oriented to its proper position. The high shock loads caused by firing the gun particularly results in damage to the guidance system.
The disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by the present invention, and an improved perforating gun and method are hereinafter disclosed.
In one embodiment, the downhole tool is a perforating gun with a ratcheting uni-directional swivel sub. The invention utilizes the unbalanced nature inherent in electromechanical cable and takes advantage of the cable's natural tendency to create a rotational torque.
A system for perforating a well according to this invention includes a perforating gun including one or more perforating charges which are fired to perforate the well. The gun is suspended in the well from a wireline which includes an inner sheath and an outer sheath having different strengths. A swivel is provided for enabling rotation of the perforating gun with respect to a lower end of the wireline, and a rotational latching mechanism, such as a ratcheting mechanism, rotationally locks the perforating gun with the lower end of the wireline in one direction, while allowing the swivel to rotate the lower end of the wireline independent of the gun in an opposing direction. Tension in the wireline thus results in rotational torque to rotate the perforating gun in one direction, and the ratcheting mechanism prevents rotation of the gun in an opposing direction.
In a preferred embodiment, an orientation sub is provided with orientation sensors for determining the azimuthal position of the tool in the well. The wireline includes one or multiple conductors for transmitting signals from the orientation sub to the surface.
It is a feature of the invention that surface equipment, which preferably includes a computer, a display, and an operator input, is provided for receiving signals from the orientation sub, such that the proper orientation of the gun at the desired depth in the well may be determined prior to firing the gun.
Yet another feature of the invention is that the swivel sub may include an inner mandrel, an outer mandrel rotatable with respect to the inner mandrel, and a slip ring assembly for transmitting signals from the orientation sub through the swivel and to the surface. An annulus between the inner mandrel and the outer mandrel may be filled with a selected fluid, and a pressure compensator provided for maintaining a desired pressure differential between the fluid in the annulus and the environment exterior of the swivel sub.
Still a further feature of the invention is that the ratcheting mechanism may include a gear and pawl assembly. In a preferred embodiment, a gear with plurality of circumferentially spaced teeth is provided on an inner mandrel of the swivel sub, and a pawl for engaging the teeth is mounted on an outer mandrel. The pawl and gear assembly allow rotation of the inner mandrel in one direction relative to the outer mandrel, but prohibit rotation of the inner mandrel relative to the outer mandrel in an opposing direction.
According to the method of the invention, the orientable tool, such as a perforating gun, may be lowered in a well from a wireline to a depth lower than the desired perforation depth. As the gun is raised and lowered past the perforation depth, the orientation sub monitors the azimuthal position of the gun within the well. As the gun is raised and lowered, changes in tension in the wireline rotate the gun in one direction. Once the orientation sub determines that the gun is at the proper azimuthal position, the wireline is pulled upward, thereby raising the gun to the desired perforation depth. As the gun is pulled upward in the well, it is rotationally separated from the end of the wireline due to the ratcheting mechanism. When at the proper depth and the desired orientation, as verified by the orientation sub, the gun may then be fired.
A significant advantage of the present invention is that a highly reliable system for perforating a well does not include complex and expensive components. To the contrary, the individual components of the system have been proven to be highly reliable in downhole operations.
These and further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, wherein reference is made to the figures in the accompanying drawings.
Above the gun is positioned an orientation sub 14, a swivel sub 12, and a head 51, with an upper end of each component connected to a lower end of the upper component. The head 51 connects the wireline 50 to the gun assembly for suspending the gun 10 in the well. A single or multi-conductor cable head 51 for transmitting electrical and/or optical signals, and for transmitting mechanical integrity, may thus be attached to the swivel sub 12. The orientation sub 14 is capable of detecting the azimuthal orientation of the downhole assembly, and includes one or more sensors 15 for generating signals indicative of azimuthal position and is connected to the perforating gun 10 that is to be oriented. The orientation sub 14 may house any number of conventional guidance system technologies, including conventional gyros, rate gyros, optical gyros, inertia systems, accelerometers, magnetometers, and low-side/high-side sensing systems. In still other embodiments, sensors on the orientation sub 14 may be responsive to a smart package system in a well which may include triggers, sensor triggers, or transmitters in the well, so that wireline 8 may be used to transmit smart well data to surface equipment to analyze the data and determine when the tool is properly oriented.
The electromagnetic cable 50 as shown in
The swivel sub 12 according to the present invention includes a ratcheting mechanism 90 as shown in
The swivel sub 12 as shown in
A toothed gear and pawl ratcheting mechanism 90 as shown in
The swivel sub 12 of the present invention may include a ratcheting mechanism which may be employed in either direction, thus allowing a “free will” condition during either the deployment or retrieval of the gun. The direction of rotational force applied to the gun may be selected by the configuration of the ratcheting mechanism. Orientation of the gun 10 may be achieved in either the upward or downward movement of the electromechanical cable 50, then the gun maintained in that orientation while moving axially to the correct firing depth in the well. Once the gun is pointed in the desired position, the gun may be raised or lowered in the well to the correct firing depth, with that operation resulting in rotation of the lower end of the cable due to the varying strengths of the sheaths, but the swivel allows the end of the cable to rotate independent of the orientation of the gun, so that the gun desirably maintains its orientation when moved to the desired firing depth. When being raised or lowered to the firing depth, it is possible that the “free wheeling” gun may bump the side of the borehole, in which case the gun may rotate. When at the desired firing depth, however, the proper position of the gun may be checked by the orientation sub and, if the gun has undesirably rotated to become out of alignment with its selected position, the gun may again be lowered or raised in the well to a position wherein the gun is properly oriented, then the gun moved axially to the desired firing depth. When the gun is at its desired depth and the desired orientation of the gun is confirmed by the orientation sub, the gun may be fired.
It should be understood that a change in the depth of the gun in a well will tend to rotate the gun, but that the forces which cause that rotation are not directly a function of the depth of the gun, but more properly a function of the changed tension in the cable. When lowering a gun in a well at a given depth, the tension in the cable will thus be different then when raising the gun in the same well at the same depth. Accordingly, the action of lowering or raising the gun changes the torsional forces at the lower end of the cable which may be selectively transmitted or is rotationally separated from the gun, and those changing forces are affected by the depth of the gun in the well, whether the gun is being raised or lowered at that depth, and possibly the speed at which the gun is moving in the well at that depth.
A preferred embodiment of the invention as discussed above includes a ratcheting mechanism which rotationally locks the gun in one direction with respect to the lower end of the cable while allowing the swivel to rotationally disconnect the gun in an opposing direction from the lower end of the cable, such that a change in tension in the wireline results in rotational torque to rotate the gun in the well, while the ratcheting mechanism rotationally disconnects the gun from the lower end of the cable in the opposing direction. A ratcheting mechanism is a preferred type of a rotational latching mechanism for accomplishing this purpose, although various rotational latching mechanisms other than a ratcheting mechanism may serve this purpose. In this sense, the invention provides a form of a controllable or selectable swivel sub which normally allows rotation, but which can be rotationally unlatched such that the rotational forces at the end of the cable are disconnected or “free wheeling” from the gun. The ability to lock the swivel sub and thereby eliminate the ability of the sub to swivel causes the rotational forces developed in the cable to act on the perforating gun, rotating the gun. The invention also provides the ability to “unlock” the swivel, such that once the desired gun orientation is achieved, the swivel is “unlocked” and the rotational forces developed in the cable are prevented from affecting the perforating gun orientation due to the rotation at the swivel.
Another technique for controlling the swivel sub would be through an electromagnetic mechanism, such as an electro solenoid, which is another form of a rotational latching mechanism. The solenoid may activate a locking pin that may mate with equally spaced holes or slots on the inner or outer mandrel of the swivel sub. When the solenoid is activated, the swivel sub would be prevented from swiveling. An option to the locking pin may be that the solenoid may activate a brake system, such as a caliper/disk arrangement, to prevent the swivel function. Alternatively, an inner and outer mandrel of the swivel may be rotatably locked without employing moving parts, e.g., using electromagnets. Energizing an electromagnet pair or a single electromagnet coupled to a permanent magnet may generate sufficient force to effect a rotational lock between the inner and outer mandrel. The solenoid or other electrical device may be controlled by a directional rotation sensor in the swivel, or controlled from surface via the electromechanical logging cable.
It may also be possible to lock and unlock the swivel sub by controlling a locking pin or caliper/disk brake system activated by altering the hydrostatic well pressure. By increasing or decreasing the pressure at the surface, the resultant hydrostatic pressure experienced at the tool is altered. Sensors located in the swivel sub may then activate or deactivate the pin, brake or other mechanism to lock and unlock the swivel sub.
Other mechanical techniques may be employed that may rely on the direction of rotation or the differences in tension experienced at the swivel sub when altering direction of movement. Existing oil field devices utilize sliding sleeves and/or slotted mechanism, such as “J” slots or “W” slots, to achieve down hole mechanical actions. Such mechanical movements may be employed to lock and unlock the swivel action of the swivel sub as the direction of travel is reversed. Likewise, numerous techniques may be used that, like the ratcheting mechanism described, lock the inner and outer mandrel depending on their relative direction of rotation. A rotational latching mechanism may employ offset cams that act as a brake in one direction, but allow slipping in the opposite direction. Mechanical linkages may engage or disengage a locking pin, depending on relative rotation.
Logging tools commonly used for either fluid or formation testing may benefit by orienting the logging tool or sampling device in relation to the anisotropic distribution of the formation properties. Suitable logging tools orientatable in a well according to this invention include an explosive sidewall core sampling tool, a rotary sidewall core sampling tool, and a hydraulically operated fluid sampling device. Suitable tools may include pad mounted density logging tools, pad mounted neutron logging tools and pad mounted micro-resistivity logging tools. Various pad mounted sensors in the logging tool may be oriented prior to beginning the logging pass to either reduce borehole effects or overcome limitations of the pad deployment. The logging tool may thus be oriented in the well at the desired azimuthal position and the desired depth by the techniques of the present invention.
As discussed above, the equipment and techniques of the present invention are well suited for properly orienting a gun in a well. It should be appreciated, however, that various downhole tools other than guns may similarly be oriented in a well by providing an orientation sub for determining the azimuthal position of the tool, and then pulling the tool upward on the wireline to the desired position while the rotational latching mechanism rotationally disconnects the tool from the lower end of the wireline. Tools other than perforating guns, logging tools or sampling devices may also be beneficially oriented at selected depths when the action or measurements of the tool are orientably dependent.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated in detail, it should then be apparent that other modifications and adaptations of the preferred embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3485224 | Ronald | Dec 1969 | A |
| 4573536 | Lawrence | Mar 1986 | A |
| 5259466 | Venditto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 6173773 | Almaguer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040163810 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |
