The subject matter of co-pending U.S. non-provisional application Ser. No. 15/876,120, filed Jan. 20, 2018, Ser. Nos. 15/898,753 and 15/899,147, each filed Feb. 19, 2018, Ser. No. 15/904,468, filed Feb. 26, 2018, and Ser. No. 16/106,114, filed Aug. 21, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference in entirety for all purposes, including with particular respect to a composition of matter (or material of construction) for a (sub)component for a downhole tool and a one piece bottom composite slip. One or more of these applications may be referred to herein as the “Applications”.
Not applicable.
This disclosure generally relates to tools used in oil and gas wellbores. More specifically, the disclosure relates to downhole tools that may be run into a wellbore and useable for wellbore isolation, and systems and methods pertaining to the same. In particular embodiments, the tool may be a plug made of drillable materials and may include at least one slip having a one-piece configuration. In embodiments, the tool may have a tethered ball therein.
An oil or gas well includes a wellbore extending into a subterranean formation at some depth below a surface (e.g., Earth's surface), and is usually lined with a tubular, such as casing, to add strength to the well. Many commercially viable hydrocarbon sources are found in “tight” reservoirs, which means the target hydrocarbon product may not be easily extracted. The surrounding formation (e.g., shale) to these reservoirs is typically has low permeability, and it is uneconomical to produce the hydrocarbons (i.e., gas, oil, etc.) in commercial quantities from this formation without the use of drilling accompanied with fracing operations.
Fracing is now common in the industry, and has reshaped the global energy sector. and includes the use of a plug set in the wellbore below or beyond the respective target zone, followed by pumping or injecting high pressure frac fluid into the zone. A frac plug and accompanying operation may be such as described or otherwise disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,955,605, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.
In operation, forces (usually axial relative to the wellbore 106) are applied to the slip(s) 109, 111 and the body 103. As the setting sequence progresses, slip 109 moves in relation to the body 103 and slip 111, the seal member 122 is actuated, and the slips 109, 111 are driven against corresponding conical surfaces 104. This movement axially compresses and/or radially expands the compressible member 122, and the slips 109, 111, which results in these components being urged outward from the tool 102 to contact the inner wall 107. In this manner, the tool 102 provides a seal expected to prevent transfer of fluids from one section 113 of the wellbore across or through the tool 102 to another section 115 (or vice versa, etc.), or to the surface. Tool 102 may also include an interior passage (not shown) that allows fluid communication between section 113 and section 115 when desired by the user. Oftentimes multiple sections are isolated by way of one or more additional plugs (e.g., 102A).
Upon proper setting, the plug may be subjected to high or extreme pressure and temperature conditions, which means the plug must be capable of withstanding these conditions without destruction of the plug or the seal formed by the seal element. High temperatures are generally defined as downhole temperatures above 200° F., and high pressures are generally defined as downhole pressures above 7,500 psi, and even in excess of 15,000 psi. Extreme wellbore conditions may also include high and low pH environments. In these conditions, conventional tools, including those with compressible seal elements, may become ineffective from degradation. For example, the sealing element may melt, solidify, or otherwise lose elasticity, resulting in a loss the ability to form a seal barrier.
Because plugs are required to withstand extreme downhole conditions, they are built for durability and toughness, which often makes a drill-through process difficult. Even drillable plugs are typically constructed of some metal such as cast iron that may be drilled out with a drill bit at the end of a drill string. Steel may also be used in the structural body of the plug to provide structural strength to set the tool. The more metal parts used in the tool, the longer the drilling operation takes. Because metallic components are harder to drill through, this process may require additional trips into and out of the wellbore to replace worn out drill bits.
The use of plugs in a wellbore is not without other problems, as these tools are subject to known failure modes. When the plug is run into position, the slips have a tendency to pre-set before the plug reaches its destination, resulting in damage to the casing and operational delays. Pre-set may result, for example, because of residue or debris (e.g., sand) left from a previous frac. In addition, conventional plugs are known to provide poor sealing, not only with the casing, but also between the plug's components. For example, when the sealing element is placed under compression, its surfaces do not always seal properly with surrounding components (e.g., cones, etc.).
Downhole tools may have a ball seat for receiving a drop ball, which may be an ‘in place’ ball during run in (i.e., the ball is with the tool during run-in). When the tool is set and the drop ball engages the ball seat, the casing or other tubular in which the tool is set is sealed. Fluid may be pumped into the well after the drop ball engages the seat and forced into a formation above the tool. Prior to the seating of the ball, however, flow through the tool is allowed.
Another way to seal the tool is to drop a ball from the surface after the tool is set. Although the ball may ultimately reach the ball seat to perform its desired function, it takes time for the ball to reach the ball seat, and as the ball is pumped downward a substantial amount of fluid can be lost. Fluid loss and lost time to get the ball seated can still be a problem, however, especially in deviated or horizontal wells.
Some wells are deviated to such an extent that even though the ball is run into the well with the tool, the ball can drift away from the tool as it is lowered into the well through the deviated portions thereof. In horizontal wells, or some portions that may even angle slightly upwardly, the drop ball may separate from the tool a great distance in the well. Thus, a large amount of fluid and time may yet again may ultimately be needed to get the ball moved to the ball seat. This is even more the case when the ball is of significant weight and/or density.
When a ball is seated, there is some concern over pressure imbalance through the tool, to the point that it may be desirous to equalize by removing the ball from the seat. This is especially the case with pressurized zones below the location of the set plug. But removal of the ball to equalize pressure may result in the ball getting lodged in an above-tool perforation, whereby any subsequent pumpdown will be ineffective.
Applicant has addressed significant industry needs with its commercially successful ‘Boss Hog’ frac plug (and related embodiments), and other improvements in downhole technology. Applicant's redesign and innovation over conventional downhole tools has resulted in running of more than 190,000 plugs without damaging casing or presets in major basins throughout the United States and Canada, and have held pressures exceeding 10,000 psi during frac stage treatments. Applicant's innovation around its plug has culminated in no less than 20 issued patents worldwide, with other patent applications yet pending.
The ability to save operational time (and those saving operational costs) leads to considerable competition in the marketplace. Achieving any ability to save time, or ultimately cost, leads to an immediate competitive advantage, so the Applicant continues to progress the art by addressing needs where they exist.
There is a need for a downhole tool that will allow for flow therethrough until the tool is set the drop ball engages the ball seat, but that can be set with a minimal amount of fluid loss and loss of time. There is a need in the art to prevent inadvertent obstruction or other problems caused by objects proximate to a set tool.
There are needs in the art for novel systems and methods for isolating wellbores in a viable and economical fashion. There is a great need in the art for downhole plugging tools that form a reliable and resilient seal against a surrounding tubular. There is also a need for a downhole tool made substantially of a drillable material that is easier and faster to drill. It is highly desirous for these downhole tools to readily and easily withstand extreme wellbore conditions, and at the same time be cheaper, smaller, lighter, and useable in the presence of high pressures associated with drilling and completion operations.
Embodiments of the disclosure pertain to a method of using a downhole tool that may include one or more steps of: at a surface facility proximate to a wellbore, connecting the downhole tool with a workstring; operating the workstring to run the downhole tool into the wellbore to a desired position; setting the downhole tool; and disconnecting the downhole tool from the workstring.
Other embodiments of the disclosure pertain to a method of using a downhole tool that may include one or more steps of: connecting the downhole tool to a workstring; operating a workstring to run the downhole tool into a wellbore to a desired position; placing the mandrel under a tensile load; setting the downhole tool; and disconnecting the downhole tool from the workstring when the tensile load is of sufficient amount to cause shearing.
Embodiments of the disclosure pertain to a tethered ball assembly for a downhole tool that may include a ball; a drag; and a tether having a first portion coupled between the ball and the drag.
The assembly may include a retainer. The tether may have a second portion coupled between the retainer and the drag. There may be a second tether is coupled between the retainer and the drag.
The drag may be spherical.
The retainer may be coupled to the downhole tool. The downhole tool may be a frac plug.
Embodiments herein pertain to a downhole tool that may have a mandrel configured with a bore and a ball seat. The tool may have a tethered ball assembly associated therewith. The assembly may include a ball; a drag; and at least one tether coupled between the ball and the drag. The assembly may include a retainer.
The retainer may be coupled to the downhole tool in a manner whereby the ball is free to move off the ball seat only so far as the tether permits.
In aspects, a second tether may be coupled between the retainer and the drag.
The drag may be spherical. The downhole tool may be a frac plug. At least one component of the downhole tool and/or tethered ball assembly may be made of a reactive material.
Yet other embodiments of the disclosure pertain to a method of using a downhole tool that may include the steps of: running the downhole tool to a desire location within a tubular disposed within a subterranean formation; seating a tethered ball assembly against a ball seat of the downhole tool.
The ball assembly may include a ball; a drag; and a tether coupled between the ball and the drag.
These and other embodiments, features and advantages will be apparent in the following detailed description and drawings.
For a more detailed description of the present invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Herein disclosed are novel apparatuses, systems, and methods that pertain to downhole tools usable for wellbore operations, details of which are described herein.
Downhole tools according to embodiments disclosed herein may include one or more anchor slips, one or more compression cones engageable with the slips, and a compressible seal element disposed therebetween, all of which may be configured or disposed around a mandrel. The mandrel may include a flow bore open to an end of the tool and extending to an opposite end of the tool. In embodiments, the downhole tool may be a frac plug or a bridge plug. Thus, the downhole tool may be suitable for frac operations. In an exemplary embodiment, the downhole tool may be a composite frac plug made of drillable material, the plug being suitable for use in vertical or horizontal wellbores.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are described in detail with reference to the accompanying Figures. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, such as to mean, for example, “including, but not limited to . . . ”. While the disclosure may be described with reference to relevant apparatuses, systems, and methods, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited to the specific embodiments shown or described. Rather, one skilled in the art will appreciate that a variety of configurations may be implemented in accordance with embodiments herein.
Although not necessary, like elements in the various figures may be denoted by like reference numerals for consistency and ease of understanding. Numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the disclosure; however, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments disclosed herein may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known features have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily complicating the description. Directional terms, such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” “front,” “back,” etc., are used for convenience and to refer to general direction and/or orientation, and are only intended for illustrative purposes only, and not to limit the disclosure.
Connection(s), couplings, or other forms of contact between parts, components, and so forth may include conventional items, such as lubricant, additional sealing materials, such as a gasket between flanges, PTFE between threads, and the like. The make and manufacture of any particular component, subcomponent, etc., may be as would be apparent to one of skill in the art, such as molding, forming, press extrusion, machining, or additive manufacturing. Embodiments of the disclosure provide for one or more components to be new, used, and/or retrofitted.
Numerical ranges in this disclosure may be approximate, and thus may include values outside of the range unless otherwise indicated. Numerical ranges include all values from and including the expressed lower and the upper values, in increments of smaller units. As an example, if a compositional, physical or other property, such as, for example, molecular weight, viscosity, melt index, etc., is from 100 to 1,000, it is intended that all individual values, such as 100, 101, 102, etc., and sub ranges, such as 100 to 144, 155 to 170, 197 to 200, etc., are expressly enumerated. It is intended that decimals or fractions thereof be included. For ranges containing values which are less than one or containing fractional numbers greater than one (e.g., 1.1, 1.5, etc.), smaller units may be considered to be 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, etc. as appropriate. These are only examples of what is specifically intended, and all possible combinations of numerical values between the lowest value and the highest value enumerated, are to be considered to be expressly stated in this disclosure.
Terms
Composition of matter: as used herein may refer to one or more ingredients or constituents that make up a material (or material of construction). For example, a material may have a composition of matter. Similarly, a device may be made of a material having a composition of matter. The composition of matter may be derived from an initial composition.
Reactive Material: as used herein may refer a material with a composition of matter having properties and/or characteristics that result in the material responding to a change over time and/or under certain conditions. The term reactive material may encompass degradable, dissolvable, disassociatable, and so on.
Degradable Material: as used herein may refer to a composition of matter having properties and/or characteristics that, while subject to change over time and/or under certain conditions, lead to a change in the integrity of the material. As one example, the material may initially be hard, rigid, and strong at ambient or surface conditions, but over time (such as within about 12-36 hours) and under certain conditions (such as wellbore conditions), the material softens.
Dissolvable Material: analogous to degradable material; as used herein may refer to a composition of matter having properties and/or characteristics that, while subject to change over time and/or under certain conditions, lead to a change in the integrity of the material, including to the point of degrading, or partial or complete dissolution. As one example, the material may initially be hard, rigid, and strong at ambient or surface conditions, but over time (such as within about 12-36 hours) and under certain conditions (such as wellbore conditions), the material softens. As another example, the material may initially be hard, rigid, and strong at ambient or surface conditions, but over time (such as within about 12-36 hours) and under certain conditions (such as wellbore conditions), the material dissolves at least partially, and may dissolve completely. The material may dissolve via one or more mechanisms, such as oxidation, reduction, deterioration, go into solution, or otherwise lose sufficient mass and structural integrity.
Breakable Material: as used herein may refer to a composition of matter having properties and/or characteristics that, while subject to change over time and/or under certain conditions, lead to brittleness. As one example, the material may be hard, rigid, and strong at ambient or surface conditions, but over time and under certain conditions, becomes brittle. The breakable material may experience breakage into multiple pieces, but not necessarily dissolution.
Disassociatable Material: as used herein may refer to a composition of matter having properties and/or characteristics that, while subject to change over time and/or under certain conditions, lead to a change in the integrity of the material, including to the point of changing from a solid structure to a powdered material. As one example, the material may initially be hard, rigid, and strong at ambient or surface conditions, but over time (such as within about 12-36 hours) and under certain conditions (such as wellbore conditions), the material changes (disassociates) to a powder.
For some embodiments, a material of construction may include a composition of matter designed or otherwise having the inherent characteristic to react or change integrity or other physical attribute when exposed to certain wellbore conditions, such as a change in time, temperature, water, heat, pressure, solution, combinations thereof, etc. Heat may be present due to the temperature increase attributed to the natural temperature gradient of the earth, and water may already be present in existing wellbore fluids. The change in integrity may occur in a predetermined time period, which may vary from several minutes to several weeks. In aspects, the time period may be about 12 to about 36 hours.
The term “fracing” as used herein can refer to fractionation of a downhole well that has already been drilled. ‘Fracing’ can also be referred to and interchangeable with the terms facing operation, fractionation, hydrofracturing, hydrofracking, fracking, frac, and so on. A frac operation can be land or water based.
Referring now to
In accordance with embodiments of the disclosure, the tool 202 may be configured as a plugging tool, which may be set within the tubular 208 in such a manner that the tool 202 forms a fluid-tight seal against the inner surface 207 of the tubular 208. In an embodiment, the downhole tool 202 may be configured as a bridge plug, whereby flow from one section of the wellbore 213 to another (e.g., above and below the tool 202) is controlled. In other embodiments, the downhole tool 202 may be configured as a frac plug, where flow into one section 213 of the wellbore 206 may be blocked and otherwise diverted into the surrounding formation or reservoir 210.
In yet other embodiments, the downhole tool 202 may also be configured as a ball drop tool. In this aspect, a ball may be dropped into the wellbore 206 and flowed into the tool 202 and come to rest in a corresponding ball seat at the end of the mandrel 214. The seating of the ball may provide a seal within the tool 202 resulting in a plugged condition, whereby a pressure differential across the tool 202 may result. The ball seat may include a radius or curvature.
In other embodiments, the downhole tool 202 may be a ball check plug, whereby the tool 202 is configured with a ball already in place when the tool 202 runs into the wellbore. The tool 202 may then act as a check valve, and provide one-way flow capability. Fluid may be directed from the wellbore 206 to the formation with any of these configurations.
Once the tool 202 reaches the set position within the tubular, the setting mechanism or workstring 212 may be detached from the tool 202 by various methods, resulting in the tool 202 left in the surrounding tubular and one or more sections of the wellbore isolated. In an embodiment, once the tool 202 is set, tension may be applied to the adapter 252 until the threaded connection between the adapter 252 and the mandrel 214 is broken. For example, the mating threads on the adapter 252 and the mandrel 214 (256 and 216, respectively as shown in
Accordingly, the adapter 252 may separate or detach from the mandrel 214, resulting in the workstring 212 being able to separate from the tool 202, which may be at a predetermined moment. The loads provided herein are non-limiting and are merely exemplary. The setting force may be determined by specifically designing the interacting surfaces of the tool and the respective tool surface angles. The tool may 202 also be configured with a predetermined failure point (not shown) configured to fail or break. For example, the failure point may break at a predetermined axial force greater than the force required to set the tool but less than the force required to part the body of the tool.
Operation of the downhole tool 202 may allow for fast run in of the tool 202 to isolate one or more sections of the wellbore 206, as well as quick and simple drill-through to destroy or remove the tool 202. Drill-through of the tool 202 may be facilitated by components and sub-components of tool 202 made of drillable material that is less damaging to a drill bit than those found in conventional plugs.
The downhole tool 202 may have one or more components made of a material as described herein and in accordance with embodiments of the disclosure. In an embodiment, the downhole tool 202 and/or its components may be a drillable tool made from drillable composite material(s), such as glass fiber/epoxy, carbon fiber/epoxy, glass fiber/PEEK, carbon fiber/PEEK, etc. Other resins may include phenolic, polyamide, etc. All mating surfaces of the downhole tool 202 may be configured with an angle, such that corresponding components may be placed under compression instead of shear.
The downhole tool 202 may have one or more components made of non-composite material, such as a metal or metal alloys. The downhole tool 202 may have one or more components made of a reactive material (e.g., dissolvable, degradable, etc.).
In embodiments, one or more components may be made of a metallic material, such as an aluminum-based or magnesium-based material. The metallic material may be reactive, such as dissolvable, which is to say under certain conditions the respective component(s) may begin to dissolve, and thus alleviating the need for drill thru. In embodiments, the components of the tool 202 may be made of dissolvable aluminum-, magnesium-, or aluminum-magnesium-based (or alloy, complex, etc.) material, such as that provided by Nanjing Highsur Composite Materials Technology Co. LTD.
One or more components of tool 202 may be made of non-dissolvable materials (e.g., materials suitable for and are known to withstand downhole environments [including extreme pressure, temperature, fluid properties, etc.] for an extended period of time (predetermined or otherwise) as may be desired).
Just the same, one or more components of a tool of embodiments disclosed herein may be made of reactive materials (e.g., materials suitable for and are known to dissolve, degrade, etc. in downhole environments [including extreme pressure, temperature, fluid properties, etc.] after a brief or limited period of time (predetermined or otherwise) as may be desired). In an embodiment, a component made of a reactive material may begin to react within about 3 to about 48 hours after setting of the downhole tool 202.
The downhole tool 202 (and other tool embodiments disclosed herein) and/or one or more of its components may be 3D printed as would be apparent to one of skill in the art, such as via one or more methods or processes described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,771; 5,204,055; 7,087,109; 7,141,207; and 5,147,587. See also information available at the websites of Z Corporation (www.zcorp.com); Prometal (www.prometal.com); EOS GmbH (www.eos.info); and 3D Systems, Inc. (www.3dsystems.com); and Stratasys, Inc. (www.stratasys.com and www.dimensionprinting.com) (applicable to all embodiments).
Referring now to
The presence of the bore 250 or other flowpath through the mandrel 214 may indirectly be dictated by operating conditions. That is, in most instances the tool 202 may be large enough in diameter (e.g., 4¾ inches) that the bore 250 may be correspondingly large enough (e.g., 1¼ inches) so that debris and junk can pass or flow through the bore 250 without plugging concerns. However, with the use of a smaller diameter tool 202, the size of the bore 250 may need to be correspondingly smaller, which may result in the tool 202 being prone to plugging. Accordingly, the mandrel may be made solid to alleviate the potential of plugging within the tool 202.
With the presence of the bore 250, the mandrel 214 may have an inner bore surface 247, which may include one or more threaded surfaces formed thereon. As such, there may be a first set of threads 216 configured for coupling the mandrel 214 with corresponding threads 256 of a setting adapter 252.
The coupling of the threads, which may be shear threads, may facilitate detachable connection of the tool 202 and the setting adapter 252 and/or workstring (212,
The adapter 252 may include a stud 253 configured with the threads 256 thereon. In an embodiment, the stud 253 has external (male) threads 256 and the mandrel 214 has internal (female) threads; however, type or configuration of threads is not meant to be limited, and could be, for example, a vice versa female-male connection, respectively.
The downhole tool 202 may be run into wellbore (206,
The setting device(s) and components of the downhole tool 202 may be coupled with, and axially and/or longitudinally movable along mandrel 214. When the setting sequence begins, the mandrel 214 may be pulled into tension while the setting sleeve 254 remains stationary. The lower sleeve 260 may be pulled as well because of its attachment to the mandrel 214 by virtue of the coupling of threads 218 and threads 262. As shown in the embodiment of
As the lower sleeve 260 is pulled in the direction of Arrow A, the components disposed about mandrel 214 between the lower sleeve 260 and the setting sleeve 254 may begin to compress against one another. This force and resultant movement causes compression and expansion of seal element 222. The lower sleeve 260 may also have an angled sleeve end 263 in engagement with the slip 234, and as the lower sleeve 260 is pulled further in the direction of Arrow A, the end 263 compresses against the slip 234. As a result, slip(s) 234 may move along a tapered or angled surface 228 of a composite member 220, and eventually radially outward into engagement with the surrounding tubular (208,
Serrated outer surfaces or teeth 298 of the slip(s) 234 may be configured such that the surfaces 298 prevent the slip 234 (or tool) from moving (e.g., axially or longitudinally) within the surrounding tubular, whereas otherwise the tool 202 may inadvertently release or move from its position. Although slip 234 is illustrated with teeth 298, it is within the scope of the disclosure that slip 234 may be configured with other gripping features, such as buttons or inserts (e.g.,
Initially, the seal element 222 may swell into contact with the tubular, followed by further tension in the tool 202 that may result in the seal element 222 and composite member 220 being compressed together, such that surface 289 acts on the interior surface 288. The ability to “flower”, unwind, and/or expand may allow the composite member 220 to extend completely into engagement with the inner surface of the surrounding tubular.
Additional tension or load may be applied to the tool 202 that results in movement of cone 236, which may be disposed around the mandrel 214 in a manner with at least one surface 237 angled (or sloped, tapered, etc.) inwardly of second slip 242. The second slip 242 may reside adjacent or proximate to collar or cone 236. As such, the seal element 222 forces the cone 236 against the slip 242, moving the slip 242 radially outwardly into contact or gripping engagement with the tubular. Accordingly, the one or more slips 234, 242 may be urged radially outward and into engagement with the tubular (208,
Because the sleeve 254 is held rigidly in place, the sleeve 254 may engage against a bearing plate 283 that may result in the transfer load through the rest of the tool 202. The setting sleeve 254 may have a sleeve end 255 that abuts against the bearing plate end 284. As tension increases through the tool 202, an end of the cone 236, such as second end 240, compresses against slip 242, which may be held in place by the bearing plate 283. As a result of cone 236 having freedom of movement and its conical surface 237, the cone 236 may move to the underside beneath the slip 242, forcing the slip 242 outward and into engagement with the surrounding tubular (208,
The second slip 242 may include one or more, gripping elements, such as buttons or inserts 278, which may be configured to provide additional grip with the tubular. The inserts 278 may have an edge or corner 279 suitable to provide additional bite into the tubular surface. In an embodiment, the inserts 278 may be mild steel, such as 1018 heat treated steel. The use of mild steel may result in reduced or eliminated casing damage from slip engagement and reduced drill string and equipment damage from abrasion.
In an embodiment, slip 242 may be a one-piece slip, whereby the slip 242 has at least partial connectivity across its entire circumference. Meaning, while the slip 242 itself may have one or more grooves (or undulation, notch, etc.) 244 configured therein, the slip 242 itself has no initial circumferential separation point. In an embodiment, the grooves 244 may be equidistantly spaced or disposed in the second slip 242. In other embodiments, the grooves 244 may have an alternatingly arranged configuration. That is, one groove 244A may be proximate to slip end 241, the next groove 244B may be proximate to an opposite slip end 243, and so forth.
The tool 202 may be configured with ball plug check valve assembly that includes a ball seat 286. The assembly may be removable or integrally formed therein. In an embodiment, the bore 250 of the mandrel 214 may be configured with the ball seat 286 formed or removably disposed therein. In some embodiments, the ball seat 286 may be integrally formed within the bore 250 of the mandrel 214. In other embodiments, the ball seat 286 may be separately or optionally installed within the mandrel 214, as may be desired.
The ball seat 286 may be configured in a manner so that a ball 285 seats or rests therein, whereby the flowpath through the mandrel 214 may be closed off (e.g., flow through the bore 250 is restricted or controlled by the presence of the ball 285). For example, fluid flow from one direction may urge and hold the ball 285 against the seat 286, whereas fluid flow from the opposite direction may urge the ball 285 off or away from the seat 286. As such, the ball 285 and the check valve assembly may be used to prevent or otherwise control fluid flow through the tool 202. The ball 285 may be conventionally made of a composite material, phenolic resin, etc., whereby the ball 285 may be capable of holding maximum pressures experienced during downhole operations (e.g., fracing). By utilization of retainer pin 287, the ball 285 and ball seat 286 may be configured as a retained ball plug. As such, the ball 285 may be adapted to serve as a check valve by sealing pressure from one direction, but allowing fluids to pass in the opposite direction.
The tool 202 may be configured as a drop ball plug, such that a drop ball may be flowed to a drop ball seat 259. The drop ball may be much larger diameter than the ball of the ball check. In an embodiment, end 248 may be configured with a drop ball seat surface 259 such that the drop ball may come to rest and seat at in the seat proximate end 248. As applicable, the drop ball (not shown here) may be lowered into the wellbore (206,
In other aspects, the tool 202 may be configured as a bridge plug, which once set in the wellbore, may prevent or allow flow in either direction (e.g., upwardly/downwardly, etc.) through tool 202. Accordingly, it should be apparent to one of skill in the art that the tool 202 of the present disclosure may be configurable as a frac plug, a drop ball plug, bridge plug, etc. simply by utilizing one of a plurality of adapters or other optional components. In any configuration, once the tool 202 is properly set, fluid pressure may be increased in the wellbore, such that further downhole operations, such as fracture in a target zone, may commence.
The tool 202 may include an anti-rotation assembly that includes an anti-rotation device or mechanism 282, which may be a spring, a mechanically spring-energized composite tubular member, and so forth. The device 282 may be configured and usable for the prevention of undesired or inadvertent movement or unwinding of the tool 202 components. As shown, the device 282 may reside in cavity 294 of the sleeve (or housing) 254. During assembly the device 282 may be held in place with the use of a lock ring 296. In other aspects, pins may be used to hold the device 282 in place.
The anti-rotation mechanism may provide additional safety for the tool and operators in the sense it may help prevent inoperability of tool in situations where the tool is inadvertently used in the wrong application. For example, if the tool is used in the wrong temperature application, components of the tool may be prone to melt, whereby the device 282 and lock ring 296 may aid in keeping the rest of the tool together. As such, the device 282 may prevent tool components from loosening and/or unscrewing, as well as prevent tool 202 unscrewing or falling off the workstring 212.
Drill-through of the tool 202 may be facilitated by the fact that the mandrel 214, the slips 234, 242, the cone(s) 236, the composite member 220, etc. may be made of drillable material that is less damaging to a drill bit than those found in conventional plugs. The drill bit will continue to move through the tool 202 until the downhole slip 234 and/or 242 are drilled sufficiently that such slip loses its engagement with the well bore. When that occurs, the remainder of the tools, which generally would include lower sleeve 260 and any portion of mandrel 214 within the lower sleeve 260 falls into the well. If additional tool(s) 202 exist in the well bore beneath the tool 202 that is being drilled through, then the falling away portion will rest atop the tool 202 located further in the well bore and will be drilled through in connection with the drill through operations related to the tool 202 located further in the well bore. Accordingly, the tool 202 may be sufficiently removed, which may result in opening the tubular 208.
The tool 202 may include a tethered ball and drag assembly as set forth herein.
Referring now to
The mandrel 314 may be sufficient in length, such that the mandrel may extend through a length of tool (or tool body) (202,
The ends 346, 348 of the mandrel 314 may include internal or external (or both) threaded portions. As shown in
The proximate end 348 may include an outer taper 348A. The outer taper 348A may help prevent the tool from getting stuck or binding. For example, during setting the use of a smaller tool may result in the tool binding on the setting sleeve, whereby the use of the outer taper 348 will allow the tool to slide off easier from the setting sleeve. In an embodiment, the outer taper 348A may be formed at an angle φ of about 5 degrees with respect to the axis 358. The length of the taper 348A may be about 0.5 inches to about 0.75 inches
There may be a neck or transition portion 349, such that the mandrel may have variation with its outer diameter. In an embodiment, the mandrel 314 may have a first outer diameter D1 that is greater than a second outer diameter D2. Conventional mandrel components are configured with shoulders (i.e., a surface angle of about 90 degrees) that result in components prone to direct shearing and failure. In contrast, embodiments of the disclosure may include the transition portion 349 configured with an angled transition surface 349A. A transition surface angle b may be about 25 degrees with respect to the tool (or tool component axis) 358.
The transition portion 349 may withstand radial forces upon compression of the tool components, thus sharing the load. That is, upon compression the bearing plate 383 and mandrel 314, the forces are not oriented in just a shear direction. The ability to share load(s) among components means the components do not have to be as large, resulting in an overall smaller tool size.
There may be one or more protrusions or dogs 395A disposed on a lateral end of the proximate end 348. The protrusion 395A may include an elevated portion 370A that transitions to a lower portion 370B. While not meant to be limited,
In addition to the first set of threads 316, the mandrel 314 may have a second set of threads 318. In one embodiment, the second set of threads 318 may be rounded threads disposed along an external mandrel surface 345 at the distal end 346. The use of rounded threads may increase the shear strength of the threaded connection.
Accordingly, the use of round threads may allow a non-axial interaction between surfaces, such that there may be vector forces in other than the shear/axial direction. The round thread profile may create radial load (instead of shear) across the thread root. As such, the rounded thread profile may also allow distribution of forces along more thread surface(s). As composite material is typically best suited for compression, this allows smaller components and added thread strength. This beneficially provides upwards of 5-times strength in the thread profile as compared to conventional composite tool connections.
With particular reference to
The use of a small curvature or radius 359A may be advantageous as compared to a conventional sharp point or edge of a ball seat surface. For example, radius 359A may provide the tool with the ability to accommodate drop balls with variation in diameter, as compared to a specific diameter. In addition, the surface 359 and radius 359A may be better suited to distribution of load around more surface area of the ball seat as compared to just at the contact edge/point of other ball seats.
Referring now to
During the setting sequence, the seal element 322 and the composite member 320 may compress together. As a result of an angled exterior surface 389 of the seal element 322 coming into contact with the interior surface 388 of the composite member 320, a deformable (or first or upper) portion 326 of the composite member 320 may be urged radially outward and into engagement the surrounding tubular (not shown) at or near a location where the seal element 322 at least partially sealingly engages the surrounding tubular. There may also be a resilient (or second or lower) portion 328. In an embodiment, the resilient portion 328 may be configured with greater or increased resilience to deformation as compared to the deformable portion 326.
The composite member 320 may be a composite component having at least a first material 331 and a second material 332, but composite member 320 may also be made of a single material. The first material 331 and the second material 332 need not be chemically combined. In an embodiment, the first material 331 may be physically or chemically bonded, cured, molded, etc. with the second material 332. Moreover, the second material 332 may likewise be physically or chemically bonded with the deformable portion 326. In other embodiments, the first material 331 may be a composite material, and the second material 332 may be a second composite material.
The composite member 320 may have cuts or grooves 330 formed therein. The use of grooves 330 and/or spiral (or helical) cut pattern(s) may reduce structural capability of the deformable portion 326, such that the composite member 320 may “flower” out. The groove 330 or groove pattern is not meant to be limited to any particular orientation, such that any groove 330 may have variable pitch and vary radially.
With groove(s) 330 formed in the deformable portion 326, the second material 332, may be molded or bonded to the deformable portion 326, such that the grooves 330 are filled in and enclosed with the second material 332. In embodiments, the second material 332 may be an elastomeric material. In other embodiments, the second material 332 may be 60-95 Duro A polyurethane or silicone. Other materials may include, for example, TFE or PTFE sleeve option-heat shrink. The second material 332 of the composite member 320 may have an inner material surface 368.
Different downhole conditions may dictate choice of the first and/or second material. For example, in low temp operations (e.g., less than about 250 F), the second material comprising polyurethane may be sufficient, whereas for high temp operations (e.g., greater than about 250 F) polyurethane may not be sufficient and a different material like silicone may be used.
The use of the second material 332 in conjunction with the grooves 330 may provide support for the groove pattern and reduce preset issues. With the added benefit of second material 332 being bonded or molded with the deformable portion 326, the compression of the composite member 320 against the seal element 322 may result in a robust, reinforced, and resilient barrier and seal between the components and with the inner surface of the tubular member (e.g., 208 in
Groove(s) 330 allow the composite member 320 to expand against the tubular, which may result in a formidable barrier between the tool and the tubular. In an embodiment, the groove 330 may be a spiral (or helical, wound, etc.) cut formed in the deformable portion 326. In an embodiment, there may be a plurality of grooves or cuts 330. In another embodiment, there may be two symmetrically formed grooves 330, as shown by way of example in
As illustrated by
In an embodiment, the groove(s) 330 or groove pattern may be a spiral pattern having constant pitch (p1 about the same as p2), constant radius (r3 about the same as r4) on the outer surface 364 of the deformable member 326. In an embodiment, the spiral pattern may include constant pitch (p1 about the same as p2), variable radius (r1 unequal to r2) on the inner surface 366 of the deformable member 326.
In an embodiment, the groove(s) 330 or groove pattern may be a spiral pattern having variable pitch (p1 unequal to p2), constant radius (r3 about the same as r4) on the outer surface 364 of the deformable member 326. In an embodiment, the spiral pattern may include variable pitch (p1 unequal to p2), variable radius (r1 unequal to r2) on the inner surface 366 of the deformable member 320.
As an example, the pitch (e.g., p1, p2, etc.) may be in the range of about 0.5 turns/inch to about 1.5 turns/inch. As another example, the radius at any given point on the outer surface may be in the range of about 1.5 inches to about 8 inches. The radius at any given point on the inner surface may be in the range of about less than 1 inch to about 7 inches. Although given as examples, the dimensions are not meant to be limiting, as other pitch and radial sizes are within the scope of the disclosure.
In an exemplary embodiment reflected in
The presence of groove(s) 330 may allow the composite member 320 to have an unwinding, expansion, or “flower” motion upon compression, such as by way of compression of a surface (e.g., surface 389) against the interior surface of the deformable portion 326. For example, when the seal element 322 moves, surface 389 is forced against the interior surface 388. Generally the failure mode in a high pressure seal is the gap between components; however, the ability to unwind and/or expand allows the composite member 320 to extend completely into engagement with the inner surface of the surrounding tubular.
Referring now to
The seal element 322 may be configured to buckle (deform, compress, etc.), such as in an axial manner, during the setting sequence of the downhole tool (202,
The seal element 322 may have one or more angled surfaces configured for contact with other component surfaces proximate thereto. For example, the seal element may have angled surfaces 327 and 389. The seal element 322 may be configured with an inner circumferential groove 376. The presence of the groove 376 assists the seal element 322 to initially buckle upon start of the setting sequence. The groove 376 may have a size (e.g., width, depth, etc.) of about 0.25 inches.
Slips. Referring now to
Either or both of slips 334, 342 may be made of non-composite material, such as a metal or metal alloys. Either or both of slips 334, 342 may be made of a reactive material (e.g., dissolvable, degradable, etc.). In embodiments, the material may be a metallic material, such as an aluminum-based or magnesium-based material. The metallic material may be reactive, such as dissolvable, which is to say under certain conditions the respective component(s) may begin to dissolve, and thus alleviating the need for drill thru. In embodiments, any slip of the tool 202 may be made of dissolvable aluminum-, magnesium-, or aluminum-magnesium-based (or alloy, complex, etc.) material, such as that provided by Nanjing Highsur Composite Materials Technology Co. LTD.
Slips 334, 342 may be used in either upper or lower slip position, or both, without limitation. As apparent, there may be a first slip 334, which may be disposed around the mandrel (214,
In embodiments, the slip 334 may be a poly-moldable material. In other embodiments, the slip 334 may be hardened, surface hardened, heat-treated, carburized, etc., as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. However, in some instances, slips 334 may be too hard and end up as too difficult or take too long to drill through.
Typically, hardness on the teeth 398 may be about 40-60 Rockwell. As understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the Rockwell scale is a hardness scale based on the indentation hardness of a material. Typical values of very hard steel have a Rockwell number (HRC) of about 55-66. In some aspects, even with only outer surface heat treatment the inner slip core material may become too hard, which may result in the slip 334 being impossible or impracticable to drill-thru.
Thus, the slip 334 may be configured to include one or more holes 393 formed therein. The holes 393 may be longitudinal in orientation through the slip 334. The presence of one or more holes 393 may result in the outer surface(s) 307 of the metal slips as the main and/or majority slip material exposed to heat treatment, whereas the core or inner body (or surface) 309 of the slip 334 is protected. In other words, the holes 393 may provide a barrier to transfer of heat by reducing the thermal conductivity (i.e., k-value) of the slip 334 from the outer surface(s) 307 to the inner core or surfaces 309. The presence of the holes 393 is believed to affect the thermal conductivity profile of the slip 334, such that that heat transfer is reduced from outer to inner because otherwise when heat/quench occurs the entire slip 334 heats up and hardens.
Thus, during heat treatment, the teeth 398 on the slip 334 may heat up and harden resulting in heat-treated outer area/teeth, but not the rest of the slip. In this manner, with treatments such as flame (surface) hardening, the contact point of the flame is minimized (limited) to the proximate vicinity of the teeth 398.
With the presence of one or more holes 393, the hardness profile from the teeth to the inner diameter/core (e.g., laterally) may decrease dramatically, such that the inner slip material or surface 309 has a HRC of about ˜15 (or about normal hardness for regular steel/cast iron). In this aspect, the teeth 398 stay hard and provide maximum bite, but the rest of the slip 334 is easily drillable.
One or more of the void spaces/holes 393 may be filled with useful “buoyant” (or low density) material 400 to help debris and the like be lifted to the surface after drill-thru. The material 400 disposed in the holes 393 may be, for example, polyurethane, light weight beads, or glass bubbles/beads such as the K-series glass bubbles made by and available from 3M. Other low-density materials may be used.
The advantageous use of material 400 helps promote lift on debris after the slip 334 is drilled through. The material 400 may be epoxied or injected into the holes 393 as would be apparent to one of skill in the art.
The metal slip 334 may be treated with an induction hardening process. In such a process, the slip 334 may be moved through a coil that has a current run through it. As a result of physical properties of the metal and magnetic properties, a current density (created by induction from the e-field in the coil) may be controlled in a specific location of the teeth 398. This may lend to speed, accuracy, and repeatability in modification of the hardness profile of the slip 334. Thus, for example, the teeth 398 may have a RC in excess of 60, and the rest of the slip 334 (essentially virgin, unchanged metal) may have a RC less than about 15.
The slots 392 in the slip 334 may promote breakage. An evenly spaced configuration of slots 392 promotes even breakage of the slip 334. The metal slip 334 may have a body having a one-piece configuration defined by at least partial connectivity of slip material around the entirety of the body, as shown in
First slip 334 may be disposed around or coupled to the mandrel (214,
When sufficient load is applied, the slip 334 compresses against the resilient portion or surface of the composite member (e.g., 220,
Referring again to
Where the slip 342 is devoid of material at its ends, that portion or proximate area of the slip may have the tendency to flare first during the setting process. The arrangement or position of the grooves 344 of the slip 342 may be designed as desired. In an embodiment, the slip 342 may be designed with grooves 344 resulting in equal distribution of radial load along the slip 342. Alternatively, one or more grooves, such as groove 344B may extend proximate or substantially close to the slip end 343, but leaving a small amount material 335 therein. The presence of the small amount of material gives slight rigidity to hold off the tendency to flare. As such, part of the slip 342 may expand or flare first before other parts of the slip 342. There may be one or more grooves 344 that form a lateral opening 394a through the entirety of the slip body. That is, groove 344 may extend a depth 394 from the outer slip surface 390 to the inner slip surface 391. Depth 394 may define a lateral distance or length of how far material is removed from the slip body with reference to slip surface 390 (or also slip surface 391).
The slip 342 may have one or more inner surfaces with varying angles. For example, there may be a first angled slip surface 329 and a second angled slip surface 333. In an embodiment, the first angled slip surface 329 may have a 20-degree angle, and the second angled slip surface 333 may have a 40-degree angle; however, the degree of any angle of the slip surfaces is not limited to any particular angle. Use of angled surfaces allows the slip 342 significant engagement force, while utilizing the smallest slip 342 possible.
The use of a rigid single- or one-piece slip configuration may reduce the chance of presetting that is associated with conventional slip rings, as conventional slips are known for pivoting and/or expanding during run in. As the chance for pre-set is reduced, faster run-in times are possible.
The slip 342 may be used to lock the tool in place during the setting process by holding potential energy of compressed components in place. The slip 342 may also prevent the tool from moving as a result of fluid pressure against the tool. The second slip (342,
Referring briefly to
Referring now to
During setting, and as tension increases through the tool, an end of the cone 336, such as second end 340, may compress against the slip (see
Referring now to
As the lower sleeve 360 is pulled, the components disposed about mandrel between the may further compress against one another. The lower sleeve 360 may have one or more tapered surfaces 361, 361A which may reduce chances of hang up on other tools. The lower sleeve 360 may also have an angled sleeve end 363 in engagement with, for example, the first slip (234,
Referring now to
Because the sleeve (254,
Inner plate surface 319 may be configured for angled engagement with the mandrel. In an embodiment, plate surface 319 may engage the transition portion 349 of the mandrel 314. Lip 323 may be used to keep the bearing plate 383 concentric with the tool 202 and the slip 242. Small lip 323A may also assist with centralization and alignment of the bearing plate 383.
Referring now to
Downhole tool 1102 may be run, set, and operated as described herein and in other embodiments (such as in System 200, and so forth), and as otherwise understood to one of skill in the art. Components of the downhole tool 1102 may be arranged and disposed about a mandrel 1114, as described herein and in other embodiments, and as otherwise understood to one of skill in the art. Thus, downhole tool 1102 may be comparable or identical in aspects, function, operation, components, etc. as that of other tool embodiments disclosed herein. Similarities may not be discussed for the sake of brevity.
Operation of the downhole tool 1102 may allow for fast run in of the tool 1102 to isolate one or more sections of a wellbore as provided for herein. Drill-through of the tool 1102 may be facilitated by components and sub-components of tool 1102 made of drillable material that is less damaging to a drill bit than those found in conventional plugs and/or reactive materials that may make drilling easier, or even outright alleviate any need.
The downhole tool 1102 may have one or more components, such as slips 1134 and 1142, may be made of a material as described herein and in accordance with embodiments of the disclosure. Such materials may include composite material, reactive material (metals or composites), and so forth. Thus, the downhole tool 1102 may have one or more components made of non-composite material, such as a metal or metal alloys. The downhole tool 1102 may have one or more components made of a reactive material (e.g., dissolvable, degradable, etc.).
In embodiments, one or more components may be made of a metallic material, such as an aluminum-based or magnesium-based material. The metallic material may be reactive, such as dissolvable, which is to say under certain conditions the respective component(s) may begin to dissolve, and thus alleviating the need for drill thru. In embodiments, the components of the tool 1102 may be made of dissolvable aluminum-, magnesium-, or aluminum-magnesium-based (or alloy, complex, etc.) material, such as that provided by Nanjing Highsur Composite Materials Technology Co. LTD.
One or more components of tool 1102 may be made of non-dissolvable materials (e.g., materials suitable for and are known to withstand downhole environments [including extreme pressure, temperature, fluid properties, etc.] for an extended period of time (predetermined or otherwise) as may be desired).
Just the same, one or more components of a tool of embodiments disclosed herein may be made of reactive materials (e.g., materials suitable for and are known to dissolve, degrade, etc. in downhole environments [including extreme pressure, temperature, fluid properties, etc.] after a brief or limited period of time (predetermined or otherwise) as may be desired). In an embodiment, a component made of a reactive material may begin to react within about 3 to about 48 hours after setting of the downhole tool 1102.
The downhole tool 1102 (and other tool embodiments disclosed herein) and/or one or more of its components may be 3D printed as would be apparent to one of skill in the art.
The mandrel 1114 may extend through the tool (or tool body) 1102. The mandrel 114 may be a solid body. In other aspects, the mandrel 1114 may include a flowpath or bore 1150 formed therein (e.g., an axial bore). The bore 1150 may extend partially or for a short distance through the mandrel 1114. Alternatively, the bore 1150 may extend through the entire mandrel 1114, with an opening at its proximate end 1148 and oppositely at its distal end 1146.
With the presence of the bore 1150, the mandrel 1114 may have an inner bore surface 1147, which may include one or more threaded surfaces formed thereon. As such, there may be a first set of threads configured for coupling the mandrel 1114 with corresponding threads of a setting adapter (not shown here).
The slips 1134, 1142 may be configured with varied gripping elements that may aid or prevent the slips (or tool) from moving (e.g., axially or longitudinally) within the surrounding tubular, whereas otherwise the tool 1102 may inadvertently release or move from its position (see, e.g., buttons or inserts,
Typically the upper slip 1142 may fracture first before slip 1134. Thus, tension or load may be applied to the tool 1102 that results in movement of cone 1136, which may be disposed around the mandrel 1114 in a manner with at least one surface 1137 angled (or sloped, tapered, etc.) inwardly of upper or second slip 1142. The second slip 1142 may reside adjacent or proximate to collar or cone 1136. As such, the seal element 1122 may force or urge the cone 1136 (and cone surface 1137) against the slip 1142, moving the slip 1142 radially outwardly into contact or gripping engagement with the tubular.
Accordingly, the one or more slips 1134, 1142 may be urged radially outward and into engagement with the tubular 1108. As shown, the first slip 1134 may be at or near distal end 1146, and the second slip 1142 may be disposed around the mandrel 1114 at or near the proximate end 1148. It is within the scope of the disclosure that the position of the slips 1134 and 1142 may be interchanged. That is, in embodiments slips 1134 and 1142 may be used in each other's place. For example, slip 1142 may be the first or bottom slip, and slip 1134 may be the second or top slip. Moreover, slip 1134 may be interchanged with a slip comparable to slip 1142, and vice versa.
Prior to setting an outer slip surface 1190 may be generally planar, and offset from a long axis 1158 of the tool 1102 (or surrounding tubular 1108) by an angle a1 in the range of about 1 degree to about 15 degrees. In embodiments a1 may be between about 5 degrees to about 7 degrees. Post-setting the outer slip planar surface 1190 may be generally parallel to the long axis 1148. ‘Parallel’ is meant to include a tolerance of less than 1 degree. In the set position, ‘parallel’ may be emblematic of most of surface 1190 being moved into engagement the tubular 1108. In this respect, the body of slip 1134 may have a pivot movement associated with it beyond that of generally radially outward.
As a result of the pivot-type movement, the layers of the slip may move from parallel to longitudinal forces to being offset. That is a plane of one or more layers of the slip may, upon the slip being set, be at an angle a2 of about 1 degree to about 15 degrees, to a longitudinal axis. In this respect, the interface between respective layers may be offset from longitudinal forces, such as from setting or fluid flow, by about 1 degree to about 15 degrees. Prior to setting, the angle a2 may be substantially parallel, i.e., less than one degree.
The tool 1102 may include an anti-rotation assembly that includes an anti-rotation device or mechanism like that described herein.
Drill-through of the tool 1102 may be facilitated by the fact that the mandrel 1114, the slips 1134, 1142, the cone(s) etc. may be made of drillable material that is less damaging to a drill bit than those found in conventional plugs. Lower or bottommost slip 1134 may be made of composite material, and may be configured to provide the downhole tool 1102 with the characteristic of being able to withstand or hold at 10,000 psi or more.
Referring now to
Components of a tethered ball assembly 1290 of any of the Figures may be made of materials disclosed herein and/or as otherwise may be apparent to one of skill in the art, such as metal, elastomer, plastic, nylon, Teflon, and so forth. In one form, the tethered ball assembly 1290 may include a ball 1285 connected or otherwise coupled with a drag 1289, as shown in
The drag 1289 is shown here in box format to illustrate the non-limiting nature of it. Generally the drag 1289 may be any such device or structure suitable to downhole conditions, and provided with an ability to impart hydraulic drag to the assembly 1290 as a result of fluid flow around or against the drag 1289. The drag 1289 may be made of a durable material, such as metal or metallic-based.
The ball 1285 may be coupled to the drag 1289 via a tether 1288. The tether 1288 may be a line- or cable-type structure likewise suitable to downhole conditions, and provided with an ability couple together the ball 1285 and the drag 1289. Parameters relevant to the type of tether 1288 may include length, material, weight, breaking strength, knot strength, limpness, stretch, abrasion resistance, and so forth. The tether 1288 may be a durable material, such as steel, stainless steel, and the like. The tether 1288 may have a braided material, such as braided stainless.
Although not depicted here, the tethered ball assembly 1290 may alternatively not include the drag 1289, and instead have a retainer (e.g., 1287,
In use, fluid flow from one direction may urge and hold the ball 1285 against the seat (not shown here), whereas fluid flow from the opposite direction may urge the ball 1285 off or away from the seat. As such, the ball 1285 may be used to prevent or otherwise control fluid flow through a tool (not shown here). By utilization of the tether 1288 and the retainer 1287, the tethered ball assembly 1290 may be contemplated as a retained or controlled ball plug. As such, the ball 1285 may be adapted to serve as a pseudo check-valve by sealing pressure from one direction, but allowing fluids to pass in the opposite direction.
The drag 1289 may be any suitable surface or structure that may be readily associated with the tether 1288. The drag 1289 may be readily affixed or attached to the tether 1288 including in a permanent connection or quick- (or regular-) disconnect type connection or coupling. A permanent connection may entail a type of connection that only upon destruction of the drag 1289 or other part of the assembly 1290 in some fashion would result in disconnect. For example, a first end of the tether 1288A may be molded or cured internal to the ball 1285, and the only way for the first end to disconnect would be some mode of failure, such as the destruction of the ball 1285.
Whereas an intended disconnect may entail of type of connection that need not result in destruction, such as threads, crimping, ring/clasp, hoop/tieline, push-connect, and so forth.
In a similar manner, the ball 1285 and the retainer 1287 may be comparably connected with the tether via a permanent connection or quick- (or regular-) disconnect type connection or coupling. Thus, as would be apparent to one of skill, various parts of the tethered ball assembly 1290 may be modified, changed, substituted, etc. to fit a particular desired use.
In embodiments, the tether 1288 itself may be configured with a disconnect. For example, the tether 1288 may be configured with one or more tether connections (not shown here). In other embodiments, the assembly 1290 may be configured with a predetermined failure point, such as within the tether 1288. Whereupon encountering a certain amount of force or load, the failure point (yield) within the tether will fail, and the tether will break. Such a configuration may be useful for flowing the ball 1285 back to the surface, even though the assembly 1290 might be retained with the tool 1202.
Briefly,
Referring now to
Components of a tethered ball 1390 may be made of materials disclosed herein and/or as otherwise may be apparent to one of skill in the art. The tethered ball assembly 1390 may include a ball 1385 connected or otherwise coupled with a drag 1389. The ball 1385 may be coupled to the drag via a tether 1388.
As shown, the downhole tool 1302 may be any type of downhole tool to which a drop ball or ball-in-place may be useful, such as a frac plug. Downhole tool 1302 may be run, set, and operated as described herein and in other embodiments (such as in System 200, and so forth), and as otherwise understood to one of skill in the art. As such, the downhole tool 1302 may be run into a tubular via attachment to a workstring 1312. Components of the downhole tool 1302 may be arranged and disposed about a mandrel 1314, as described herein and in other embodiments, and as otherwise understood to one of skill in the art. Thus, downhole tool 1302 may be comparable or identical in aspects, function, operation, components, etc. as that of other tool embodiments disclosed herein. Similarities may not be discussed for the sake of brevity.
The tool 1302 (or mandrel 1314) may be configured with a ball seat 1386. The ball seat 1386 may be removable or integrally formed therein. Thus, the bore 1350 of the mandrel 1314 may be configured with the ball seat 1386 formed or removably disposed therein. The ball seat 1386 may be configured in a manner so that a ball 1385 may seat or rest therein, whereby the flowpath through the mandrel 1314 may be closed off (e.g., flow through the bore 1350 is restricted or controlled by the presence of the ball 1385).
For example, fluid flow from one direction may urge and hold the ball 1385 against the seat 1386, whereas fluid flow from the opposite direction may urge the ball 1385 off or away from the seat 1386. As such, the ball 1385 may be used to prevent or otherwise control fluid flow through the tool 1302. The ball 1385 may be made of conventional materials or of any other material of the present disclosure, and respective embodiments. Such material may provide the ball 1385 the ability of holding maximum desired pressures experienced during downhole operations (e.g., fracing). By utilization of a tether 1388 and a retainer (or anchor) 1387, the ball 1385 may be contemplated as a retained or controlled ball plug. As such, the ball 1385 may be adapted to serve as a pseudo check-valve by sealing pressure from one direction, but allowing fluids to pass in the opposite direction. The ball seat 1386 may be formed with a radius (i.e., circumferential rounded edge or surface).
The ball 1385 may be a ‘ball-in-place’ configuration, whereby the ball 1385 may be maintained with the tool 1302 during run-in. The ‘ball-in-place’ configuration is distinct from a ‘drop ball’ configuration, whereby the ball 1385 may instead be dropped and flowed down to the tool 1302. Briefly,
Referring again to
As fluid pressure F is provided in the direction of the tool 1302, fluid may initially pass through the tool 1302 and cause or impart a hydraulic drag force Fd against a drag 1389. Once the draft force Fd is sufficient, the drag 1389 (via tether 1388) may impart a corresponding pulling force against the ball 1385. Eventually the pressure F separately or in combination with the drag force Fd may cause the ball 1385 to completely and sufficiently seat on the ball seat 1386, as shown in
The drag 1389 may be any suitable surface or structure that may be readily associated with the tether 1389. The drag 1389 may be readily affixed or attached to the tether 1388 including in a permanent connection or quick- (or regular-) disconnect type connection or coupling. A permanent connection may entail a type of connection that only upon destruction of the drag 1389 or the tether 1388 in some fashion would result in disconnect. Whereas an intended disconnect may entail of type of connection that need not result in destruction, such as threads, crimp, ring/clasp, hoop/tieline, push-connect, and so forth.
In a similar manner, the ball 1385 and the anchor 1387 may be comparably connected with the tether 1388 via a permanent connection or quick- (or regular-) disconnect type connection or coupling. Thus, as would be apparent to one of skill, various parts of the tethered ball assembly 1390 may be modified, changed, substituted, etc. to fit a particular desired use.
In embodiments, one or more eyelets (not shown here) may be used with the assembly 1390. The retainer 1387 may be affixed to the tool 1302 in any manner suitable to maintain the tethered ball assembly 1390, and thus the ball 1385, with the tool 1302. In embodiments, the anchor 1387 may be integral to or part of the mandrel 1314.
Referring now to
Components of a tethered ball assembly 1490 may be made of materials disclosed herein and/or as otherwise may be apparent to one of skill in the art. As shown, the downhole tool 1402 may be any type of downhole tool to which a drop ball or ball-in-place may be useful, such as a frac plug. Downhole tool 1402 may be run, set, and operated as described herein and in other embodiments (such as in System 200, and so forth), and as otherwise understood to one of skill in the art. Thus, downhole tool 1402 may be comparable or identical in aspects, function, operation, components, etc. as that of other tool embodiments disclosed herein. Similarities may not be discussed for the sake of brevity.
As shown in
In accordance with embodiments of the disclosure, the tool 1402 may be configured as a plugging tool, which may be set within the tubular 1408 in such a manner that the tool 1402 forms a fluid-tight seal against the tubular 1408. Once the tool 1402 reaches the set position within the tubular, the setting mechanism or workstring may be detached from the tool 1402 by various methods. However, after separation of the workstring from the tool 1402, the ball 1485 may no longer be prevented from moving around.
The downhole tool 1402 may include a mandrel 1414 that extends through the tool (or tool body) 1402. The mandrel 1414 may be a solid body. In other aspects, the mandrel 1414 may include a flowpath or bore 1450 formed therein (e.g., an axial bore). The bore 1450 may extend partially or for a short distance through the mandrel 1414. Alternatively, the bore 1450 may extend through the entire mandrel 1414, with an opening at its proximate end 1448 and oppositely at its distal end 1446.
The setting device(s) and components of the downhole tool 1402 may be coupled with, and axially and/or longitudinally movable along mandrel 1414. When the setting sequence begins, the mandrel 1414 may be pulled into tension while a setting sleeve remains stationary. The lower sleeve 1460 may be pulled as well because of its attachment to the mandrel 1414 by virtue of the coupling of threads therebetween. In embodiments, one one or more anchor pins 1411 or the like may be disposed or securely positioned therein, which may also provide coupling between the lower sleeve 1460 and the mandrel 1414. As shown, the retainer 1487 may be coupled with one of the pins 1411.
Advantages
Embodiments of the downhole tool are smaller in size, which allows the tool to be used in slimmer bore diameters. Smaller in size also means there is a lower material cost per tool. Because isolation tools, such as plugs, are used in vast numbers, and are generally not reusable, a small cost savings per tool results in enormous annual capital cost savings.
A synergistic effect is realized because a smaller tool means faster drilling time is easily achieved. Again, even a small savings in drill-through time per single tool results in an enormous savings on an annual basis.
Advantageously, the configuration of components, and the resilient barrier formed by way of the composite member results in a tool that can withstand significantly higher pressures. The ability to handle higher wellbore pressure results in operators being able to drill deeper and longer wellbores, as well as greater frac fluid pressure. The ability to have a longer wellbore and increased reservoir fracture results in significantly greater production.
As the tool may be smaller (shorter), the tool may navigate shorter radius bends in well tubulars without hanging up and presetting. Passage through shorter tool has lower hydraulic resistance and can therefore accommodate higher fluid flow rates at lower pressure drop. The tool may accommodate a larger pressure spike (ball spike) when the ball seats.
The composite member may beneficially inflate or umbrella, which aids in run-in during pump down, thus reducing the required pump down fluid volume. This constitutes a savings of water and reduces the costs associated with treating/disposing recovered fluids.
One piece slips assembly are resistant to preset due to axial and radial impact allowing for faster pump down speed. This further reduces the amount of time/water required to complete frac operations.
While preferred embodiments of the disclosure have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and teachings of the disclosure. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only, and are not intended to be limiting. Many variations and modifications of the embodiments disclosed herein are possible and are within the scope of the disclosure. Where numerical ranges or limitations are expressly stated, such express ranges or limitations should be understood to include iterative ranges or limitations of like magnitude falling within the expressly stated ranges or limitations. The use of the term “optionally” with respect to any element of a claim is intended to mean that the subject element is required, or alternatively, is not required. Both alternatives are intended to be within the scope of the claim. Use of broader terms such as comprises, includes, having, etc. should be understood to provide support for narrower terms such as consisting of, consisting essentially of, comprised substantially of, and the like.
Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above but is only limited by the claims which follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated into the specification as an embodiment of the present disclosure. Thus, the claims are a further description and are an addition to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. The inclusion or discussion of a reference is not an admission that it is prior art to the present disclosure, especially any reference that may have a publication date after the priority date of this application. The disclosures of all patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference, to the extent they provide background knowledge; or exemplary, procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2230712 | Bendeler et al. | Feb 1941 | A |
2254246 | Scaramucci | Sep 1941 | A |
2683492 | Baker | Jul 1954 | A |
2797758 | Showalter | Jul 1957 | A |
2884938 | Hildebrandt | May 1959 | A |
3163225 | Perkins | Dec 1964 | A |
3343607 | Current | Sep 1967 | A |
3422898 | Conrad | Jan 1969 | A |
3687196 | Mullins | Aug 1972 | A |
3769127 | Goldsworthy et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3776561 | Haney | Dec 1973 | A |
4359090 | Luke | Nov 1982 | A |
4388971 | Peterson | Jun 1983 | A |
4436150 | Barker | Mar 1984 | A |
4437516 | Cockrell | Mar 1984 | A |
4440223 | Akkerman | Apr 1984 | A |
4469172 | Clark | Sep 1984 | A |
4630690 | Beasley et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4711300 | Wardlaw et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4784226 | Wyatt | Nov 1988 | A |
5025858 | Glaser | Jun 1991 | A |
5048606 | Allwin | Sep 1991 | A |
5113940 | Glaser | May 1992 | A |
5147857 | Raddatz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5224540 | Streich et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5246069 | Glaser et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253714 | Davis et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5333685 | Gilbert | Aug 1994 | A |
5376200 | Hall | Dec 1994 | A |
5449040 | Milner | Sep 1995 | A |
5484040 | Penisson | Jan 1996 | A |
5819846 | Bolt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839515 | Yuan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842517 | Coone | Dec 1998 | A |
5927403 | Dallas | Jul 1999 | A |
5967352 | Repp | Oct 1999 | A |
5984007 | Yuan | Nov 1999 | A |
6167963 | McMahan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6241018 | Eriksen | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6353771 | Southland | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354372 | Carisella et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6425442 | Latiolais et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6491116 | Berscheidt et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6578638 | Guillory | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6708768 | Slup et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712153 | Turley et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6899181 | Simpson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7044230 | Starr et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7087109 | Bredt et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093664 | Todd et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7255178 | Slup et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7350569 | Collins et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7350582 | McKeachnie et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7475736 | Lehr et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7484940 | O'Neill | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7735549 | Nish et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7740079 | Clayton et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753416 | Mazzaferro et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762323 | Frazier | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7980300 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002030 | Turley et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016295 | Guest et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8079413 | Frazier | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8113276 | Greenlee et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8127851 | Misselbrook | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8167033 | White | May 2012 | B2 |
8205671 | Branton | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8211248 | Marya | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231947 | Vaidya et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8267177 | Vogel et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
D673182 | Frazier | Dec 2012 | S |
8336616 | McClinton | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8381809 | White | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8459346 | Frazier | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469088 | Shkurti et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8567492 | White | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8596347 | Valencia et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8839855 | McClinton et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8757265 | Cuffe | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8770276 | Nish et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8770280 | Buytaert et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8887818 | Carr et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8893780 | Greenlee et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9416617 | Wiese et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9708878 | Cooke, Jr. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9714551 | Okura et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9745847 | Ditzler et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9790763 | Fripp et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
D806136 | Saulou et al. | Dec 2017 | S |
9845658 | Nish et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9982506 | Walton et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
20030188876 | Vick et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030226660 | Winslow et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236173 | Dobson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003928 | Frazier | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040045723 | Slup et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040216868 | Owen, Sr. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050109502 | Buc Slay et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050183864 | Trinder | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194141 | Sinclair et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060243455 | Telfer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070003449 | Hatamian | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070039742 | Costa | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070119600 | Slup et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080128133 | Turley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080196879 | Broome et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080264627 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277162 | DiFoggio | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090038790 | Barlow | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090090516 | Delucia et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090229424 | Montgomery | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236091 | Hammami et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100155050 | Frazier | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100263876 | Frazier | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276159 | Mailand et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100326660 | Ballard et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110024134 | Buckner | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110048740 | Ward et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110048743 | Stafford et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088891 | Stout | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110094802 | Vatne | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110186306 | Marya et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110232899 | Porter | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110259610 | Shkurti et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277989 | Frazier | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110290473 | Frazier | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120061105 | Neer et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120125642 | Chenault et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120181032 | Naedler et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120234538 | Martin et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120279700 | Frazier | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130032357 | Mazyar et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130048315 | VanLue | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130098600 | Roberts | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130199790 | Themig | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130240201 | Frazier | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130306331 | Bishop et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140020911 | Martinez | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027127 | Frazier et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140045731 | Daccord | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140090831 | Young et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140116677 | Sherlin | May 2014 | A1 |
20140120346 | Rochen | May 2014 | A1 |
20140190685 | Frazier et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224476 | Frazier | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140251641 | Marya et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140345875 | Murphree et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140345878 | Murphree et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140374163 | Rui et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150013996 | Davies et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150027737 | Rochen et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150068728 | Stage et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150083394 | Skarsen et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150144348 | Okura et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150239795 | Doud et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150252638 | Richards et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150275070 | Getzlaf et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150354313 | McClinton et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150368994 | Mhaskar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160115759 | Richards et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160122617 | Murphree et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160123104 | Harris | May 2016 | A1 |
20160130906 | Garvey et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160160591 | Xu et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160201427 | Fripp et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160265305 | Davies et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160281458 | Greenlee | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160305215 | Harris et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170044859 | Blair | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170101836 | Webster et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170175488 | Lisowski et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170183950 | Gillis et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170260824 | Kellner et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170260825 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170284167 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170321514 | Crow | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180179852 | Hou | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0136659 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0504848 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0890706 | Jan 1993 | EP |
1643602 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2007014339 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2008100644 | Aug 2008 | WO |
20091128853 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011097091 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011160183 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2014197827 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2016032761 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016182545 | Nov 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/051938, 6 pages, dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2012/051938, 3 pages, dated Jan. 3, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/051940, 6 pages, dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
Written Opinion dated Jan. 3, 2013 for Intl App No. PCT/US2012/051938 (5 pages). |
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 21, 2013 for Intl App No. PCT/US2012/051936 (9 pages). |
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2013 for Intl App No. PCT/US2012/051940 (10 pages). |
Search Report dated Mar. 11, 2013 for Intl App No. PCT/US2012/051934 (3 pages). |
Lehr et al., “Best Practices for Multizone Isolation Using Composite Plugs,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 142744 ConocoPhillips and Baker Hughes Conference Paper, dated Jun. 8, 2011 (40 pgs). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/051934, 6 pages, dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2012/051936, 5 pages, dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2013 for Intl App No. PCT/US2012/051940 (3 pages). |
Search Report dated Feb. 21, 2013 for Intl App No. PCT/US2012/051936 (3 pages). |
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2013 for Intl App No. PCT/US2012/051934 (10 pages). |
Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 19, 2019 for Intl App No. PCT/US2019/028061 (9 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190323314 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62661228 | Apr 2018 | US |