This disclosure relates to surface to downhole wireless communication.
Downhole communication in a wellbore involves communication between surface equipment disposed at or above a surface of the wellbore and downhole equipment disposed within the wellbore. For example, a signal can be transmitted from surface equipment to downhole equipment. For example, a signal can be transmitted from downhole equipment to surface equipment. The communication can be completed via a wired connection (for example, a wireline) or via a wireless connection. Downhole communication can also involve communication between two different equipment located downhole.
This disclosure describes technologies relating to downhole wireless communication. Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a system. The system includes a surface sub-system and a downhole sub-system. The surface sub-system includes a pump and a surface valve sub-assembly. The pump is configured to pump a fluid from a container, downhole into a wellbore. The surface valve sub-assembly is fluidically coupled to the pump and configured to receive a first portion of the fluid pumped by the pump. The surface valve sub-assembly includes a dump valve, a surface controller, and a return line. The surface controller is communicatively coupled to the dump valve. The surface controller is configured to adjust fluid flow through the dump valve. The return line is in fluid communication with the dump valve. The return line is configured to flow fluid from the dump valve to the container. The downhole sub-system is coupled to the surface valve sub-assembly and configured to be disposed within the wellbore. The downhole sub-system includes a turbine-generator and a downhole controller. The turbine-generator is configured to generate an output in response to receiving a second portion of the fluid pumped by the pump.
This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the dump valve is a first dump valve. In some implementations, the surface valve sub-assembly includes a second dump valve. In some implementations, the first dump valve and the second dump valve are in a parallel flow configuration.
In some implementations, the downhole sub-system and the surface valve sub-assembly are coupled by a coiled tubing that fluidically couples the pump to the turbine-generator.
In some implementations, the surface controller includes a surface processor and a surface computer-readable storage medium coupled to the surface processor. In some implementations, the surface computer-readable storage medium is non-transitory. In some implementations, the surface computer-readable storage medium stores programming instructions for execution by the surface processor. In some implementations, the programming instructions instruct the surface processor to perform operations including adjusting an amount of the first portion of the fluid pumped by the pump by adjusting fluid flow through each of the first dump valve and the second dump valve, such that a sinusoidal signal is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system via the second portion of the fluid pumped by the pump.
In some implementations, the turbine-generator is configured to receive the sinusoidal signal via the second portion of the fluid pumped by the pump and change the output in response to the receiving the sinusoidal signal, and the downhole controller is configured to process the change in the output.
In some implementations, the surface controller is configured to modulate the sinusoidal signal that is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system via the second portion of the fluid pumped by the pump, and the downhole controller is configured to de-modulate the sinusoidal signal that is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system via the second portion of the fluid pumped by the pump.
In some implementations, the downhole controller is configured to process the change in the output of the turbine-generator, such that a power output of the turbine-generator is maintained to be greater than a minimum power output threshold.
Certain aspects of the subject matter can be implemented as a method. A first portion of a fluid from a container is flowed to a surface valve sub-assembly. The surface valve sub-assembly includes a dump valve, a surface controller communicatively coupled to the dump valve, and a return line in fluid communication with the dump valve. Fluid flow through the dump valve is adjusted by the surface controller. The first portion of the fluid is flowed to the container by the return line. A second portion of the fluid is flowed from the container to a downhole sub-system disposed within a wellbore. The downhole sub-system includes a turbine-generator and a downhole controller coupled to the turbine-generator. The second portion of the fluid is received by the turbine-generator. An output is generated by the turbine-generator in response to receiving the second portion of the fluid. The output from the turbine-generator is received by the downhole controller. A control signal is transmitted by the downhole controller in response to receiving the output from the turbine-generator.
This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, flowing the second portion of the fluid from the container to the downhole sub-system includes flowing the second portion of the fluid through a coiled tubing fluidically coupled to the turbine-generator.
In some implementations, the dump valve is a first dump valve. In some implementations, the surface valve sub-assembly includes a second dump valve. In some implementations, the first dump valve and the second dump valve are in a parallel flow configuration. In some implementations, a split of the first portion of the fluid between the first dump valve and the second dump valve is adjusted by the surface controller.
In some implementations, adjusting the split of the first portion of the fluid between the first dump valve and the second dump valve comprises adjusting the fluid flow through each of the first dump valve and the second dump valve, such that a sinusoidal signal is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system via the second portion of the fluid.
In some implementations, the sinusoidal signal is received by the turbine-generator via the second portion of the pump. In some implementations, the output generated by the turbine-generator is changed in response to receiving the sinusoidal signal.
In some implementations, the downhole sub-system includes a circulation valve downstream of the turbine-generator. In some implementations, the circulation valve is communicatively coupled to the downhole controller. In some implementations, the change in the output is processed by the downhole controller. In some implementations, fluid flow through the circulation valve is adjusted by the downhole controller at least based on the processing of the change in the output.
In some implementations, the sinusoidal signal that is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system via the second portion of the fluid is modulated by the surface controller. In some implementations, the sinusoidal signal that is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system via the second portion of the fluid is de-modulated by the downhole controller.
In some implementations, processing the change in the output includes processing the change in the output, such that the power output of the turbine-generator is maintained to be greater than a minimum power output threshold.
Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a system. The system includes a surface sub-system configured to receive a first portion of a fluid pumped by a pump positioned at a surface location. The surface sub-system includes dump valves, a surface controller, and a return line. The surface controller is communicatively coupled to the dump valves. The surface controller is configured to adjust fluid flow through each of the dump valves. The return line is in fluid communication with the dump valves. The return line is configured to flow fluid from the dump valves to a container that provides feed to the pump. The system includes a downhole sub-system configured to be disposed within a wellbore. The downhole sub-system includes a turbine-generator, a circulation valve, and a downhole controller. The turbine-generator is configured to generate an output in response to receiving a second portion of the fluid pumped by the pump. The circulation valve is downstream of the turbine-generator. The downhole controller is coupled to the turbine-generator and communicatively coupled to the circulation valve. The downhole controller is configured to adjust fluid flow through the circulation valve in response to receiving the output from the turbine-generator.
This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the dump valves are in a parallel flow configuration.
In some implementations, the downhole sub-system and the surface sub-system are coupled by a coiled tubing.
In some implementations, the surface controller includes a surface processor and a surface computer-readable storage medium coupled to the surface processor. In some implementations, the surface computer-readable storage medium is non-transitory. In some implementations, the surface computer-readable storage medium stores surface programming instructions for execution by the surface processor. In some implementations, the surface programming instructions instruct the surface processor to perform surface operations. In some implementations, the downhole controller includes a downhole processor and a downhole computer-readable storage medium coupled to the downhole processor. In some implementations, the downhole computer-readable storage medium is non-transitory. In some implementations, the downhole computer-readable storage medium stores downhole programming instructions for execution by the downhole processor. In some implementations, the downhole programming instructions instruct the downhole processor to perform downhole operations.
The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter of this disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
This disclosure describes downhole wireless communication. Some well operations, such as well intervention, require data (sometimes in the form of command signals) to be communicated downhole to a tool string disposed within a wellbore. Some examples of methods of such downhole communication include the use of a wired connection, pressure or flow fluctuations in a circulation fluid, or pulling and pushing of coiled tubing. Wireless communication can be preferred in some cases, such as acid stimulation in multilateral wells. The systems and methods described in this disclosure include a surface sub-system and a downhole sub-system. Each of the surface and downhole sub-systems include a controller. The surface sub-system includes one or more dump valves that the surface controller controls to adjust flow of fluid downhole into a wellbore as a form of signal transmission for downhole wireless communication. The downhole sub-system disposed within the wellbore includes a turbine-generator that receives the fluid flow. The downhole controller, which is communicatively coupled to the turbine-generator, interprets the signal based on the power generated by the turbine-generator in response to receiving the fluid flow.
The subject matter described in this disclosure can be implemented in particular implementations, so as to realize one or more of the following advantages. The systems and methods described are non-intrusive in the coiled tubing and do not negatively interfere with the pump rate capacity of the coiled tubing, as is typical for conventional electric wires used for wired communication. The systems and methods described can be implemented to perform wireless communication from surface equipment to downhole equipment over long distances, for example, distances of greater than 20,000 feet. The systems and methods described can be implemented to transmit digital data and commands to a downhole toolstring in a stimulation operation in which an electric wire would not be able to be used due to material limitations.
In some implementations, the well 100 is a gas well that is used in producing hydrocarbon gas (such as natural gas) from the subterranean zones of interest 110 to the surface 106. While termed a “gas well,” the well need not produce only dry gas, and may incidentally or in much smaller quantities, produce liquid including oil, water, or both. In some implementations, the well 100 is an oil well that is used in producing hydrocarbon liquid (such as crude oil) from the subterranean zones of interest 110 to the surface 106. While termed an “oil well,” the well not need produce only hydrocarbon liquid, and may incidentally or in much smaller quantities, produce gas, water, or both. In some implementations, the production from the well 100 can be multiphase in any ratio. In some implementations, the production from the well 100 can produce mostly or entirely liquid at certain times and mostly or entirely gas at other times. For example, in certain types of wells it is common to produce water for a period of time to gain access to the gas in the subterranean zone. The concepts herein, though, are not limited in applicability to gas wells, oil wells, or even production wells, and could be used in wells for producing other gas or liquid resources or could be used in injection wells, disposal wells, or other types of wells used in placing fluids into the Earth.
As shown in
The wellhead defines an attachment point for other equipment to be attached to the well 100. For example,
The downhole sub-system 250 is configured to be disposed within the wellbore (for example, within a downhole portion of the well 100). The downhole sub-system 250 includes a turbine-generator 251 configured to generate an output in response to receiving a second portion 299b of the fluid 299 pumped by the pump 211. The output generated by the turbine-generator 251 can be, for example, a frequency output, a power output, a current output, or a voltage output. The turbine-generator 251 includes a turbine and a generator coupled together. The turbine receives fluid flow and rotates in response to receiving the fluid flow. The generator generates power in response to the rotation of the turbine. In some implementations, the turbine of the turbine-generator 251 is substituted by another hydraulic equipment, such as a vane motor. In some implementations, the downhole sub-system 250 includes a circulation valve 252 downstream of the turbine-generator 251. The downhole sub-system 250 includes a downhole controller 253 coupled to the turbine-generator 251. In implementations in which the downhole sub-system 250 includes the circulation valve 252, the downhole controller 253 is communicatively coupled to the circulation valve 252. In some implementation, the downhole controller 253 is configured to adjust fluid flow through the circulation valve 252 at least based on the output generated by the turbine-generator 251. In some implementations, the downhole sub-system 250 is coupled to the surface valve sub-assembly 220. In some implementations, the coiled tubing 290 couples the pump 211 to the turbine-generator 251.
In some implementations, the surface controller 223 includes a surface processor and a surface computer-readable storage medium coupled to the surface processor. The surface computer-readable storage medium stores programming instructions for execution by the surface processor, and the programming instructions instruct the surface processor to perform operations. In some implementations, the downhole controller 253 includes a downhole processor and a downhole computer-readable storage medium coupled to the downhole processor. The downhole computer-readable storage medium stores programming instructions for execution by the downhole processor, and the programming instructions instruct the downhole processor to perform operations. An example of the surface controller 223 and the downhole controller 253 is provided in
The split of the fluid 299 pumped by the pump 211 into the first portion 299a and the second portion 299b can be controlled by the surface controller 223. For example, the surface controller 223 is configured to adjust the percent openings of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b, thereby controlling the flow rate of the first portion 299a. In some implementations, the second portion 299b is a remaining balance of the fluid 299 in relation to the first portion 299a. Controlling the flow rate of the first portion 299a indirectly affects the flow rate of the second portion 299b based on hydraulics. For example, the surface controller 233 can adjust the percent openings of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b, such that the flow rate of the first portion 299a increases and the flow rate of the second portion 299b decreases. For example, the surface controller 233 can adjust the percent openings of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b, such that the flow rate of the first portion 299a decreases and the flow rate of the second portion 299b increases. In some implementations, the surface controller 223 is configured to adjust a split of the first portion 299a between the first dump valve 221a and the second dump valve 221b.
In some implementations, the surface controller 223 is configured to adjust an amount of the first portion 299a by adjusting the fluid flow through each of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b, such that a sinusoidal signal is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system 250 via the second portion 299b. For example, the surface controller 223 can adjust the amount of the first portion 299a by adjusting the fluid flow through each of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b in such a manner that the flow rate of the second portion 299b alternates between increasing and decreasing in an oscillating behavior similar to a sinusoidal curve. In some implementations, the surface controller 223 is configured to modulate the sinusoidal signal that is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system 250 via the second portion 299b. For example, the sinusoidal signal can be modulated with frequency shift-keying (FSK), phase-shift keying (PSK), a pulse position modulation (PPM) scheme, into Morse code, or any other conventional signal modulation scheme. In some implementations, a “data packet” hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system 250 via the second portion 299b includes a sync bits component, a payload data component, and a checksum component. The sync bits components can be used to prepare the recipient (for example, the turbine-generator 251 communicatively coupled to the downhole controller 253) of an incoming data packet. The payload data component can include a command signal allocated in a predetermined bits string and sequence. The checksum component can include a polynomial division value of the payload data bit pattern, which can in turn be used to control the integrity of the received data packet.
In some implementations, the turbine-generator 251 is configured to receive the sinusoidal signal via the second portion 299b and change the output in response to receiving the sinusoidal signal. In some implementations, the downhole controller 253 is configured to process the change in the output and adjust fluid flow through the circulation valve 252 at least based on processing the change in the output. For example, in cases where the output generated by the turbine-generator 251 is a frequency output, the downhole controller 253 can be configured to process the change in the frequency output for controlling an alternating electric machine. For example, in cases where the output generated by the turbine-generator 251 is a current output, the downhole controller 253 can be configured to process the change in the current output for controlling a continuous load of an electric machine. In some implementations, the downhole controller 253 is configured to process the change in the output of the turbine-generator 251, such that a power output of the turbine-generator 251 is maintained to be greater than a minimum power output threshold. The minimum power output threshold can be defined, for example, as the minimum amount of power necessary for operating the integrated electronic circuitry of a downhole tool string. In some implementations, the minimum power output threshold is in a range of from about 1 milliwatt (mW) to about 50 watts (W), from about 1 mW to about 40 W, from about 1 mW to about 30 W, from about 1 mW to about 20 W, from about 1 mW to about 10 W, or from about 1 mW to about 5 W. In some implementations, the downhole controller 253 is configured to de-modulate the sinusoidal signal that is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system 250 via the second portion 299b.
The downhole controller 253 is configured to maintain steady power production while the low frequency sinusoidal signal causes low frequency fluctuations on the output generated by the turbine-generator 251. For example, low frequency fluctuations can typically range from about 0.01 Hertz (Hz) to about 2 Hz. The downhole controller 253 is slower than the low frequency sinusoidal signal but fast enough to react to actual changes in operating conditions within a reasonable timeframe (for example, in a range of from about 1 minute to 3 minutes) to enable steady power supply to other onboard equipment that may be included in the downhole sub-system 250. For example, the response time for the downhole controller 253 is longer than the duration of (that is, wavelength) of the low frequency sinusoidal signal, such that the downhole controller 253 does not interfere with and compensates for the load of the turbine-generator 251, resulting in a steady voltage output of the turbine-generator 251. The lowpass filtering with a long time constant and a hard limit can be implemented to ensure steady power production. In some implementations, the time constant (τ) is calculated as
For example, for a 0.1 Hz filter, the time constant is about 1.6 seconds. In some implementations, the hard limit is an absolute minimum voltage that is set to be greater than the voltage of a battery of the downhole sub-system 250 in order to protect the battery and avoid draining/wasting energy while the turbine-generator 251 produces power. For example, the hard limit can be 8 volts (V) for a 7.2 V battery pack, such as two 3.6 V lithium cells in series.
At step 504, fluid flow through each of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b is adjusted by the surface controller 223. In some implementations, the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b are in a parallel flow configuration. In some implementations, the method 500 includes adjusting, by the surface controller 223, a split of the first portion 299a between the first dump valve 221a and the second dump valve 221b. In some implementations, adjusting the fluid flow through each of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b at step 504 includes adjusting the fluid flow through each of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b, such that a sinusoidal signal is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system 251 via a second portion (such as the second portion 299b) of the fluid 299. In some implementations, the method 500 includes modulating, by the surface controller 223, the sinusoidal signal that is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system 250 via the second portion 299b. At step 506, the first portion 299a of the fluid 299 is flowed by the return line 213 back to the container 212.
At step 508, the second portion 299b of the fluid 299 is flowed from the container 212 to a downhole sub-system disposed within a wellbore (such as the downhole sub-system 250 disposed within the well 100). As mentioned previously, the downhole sub-system 250 includes the turbine-generator 251 and the downhole controller 253. The downhole controller 253 is coupled to the turbine-generator 251. In some implementations, flowing the second portion 299b to the downhole sub-system 250 at step 508 includes flowing the second portion 299b through a coiled tubing (such as the coiled tubing 290) that is fluidically coupled to the turbine-generator 251. At step 510, the second portion 299b of the fluid 299 is received by the turbine-generator 251.
At step 512, an output (for example, a frequency output, a power output, a current output, or a voltage output) is generated by the turbine-generator 251 in response to receiving the second portion 299b of the fluid 299 at step 510. At step 514, the output (and/or a change in the output) from the turbine-generator 251 (generated at step 512) is received by the downhole controller 253. In some implementations, receiving the second portion 299b by the turbine-generator 251 at step 510 includes receiving the sinusoidal signal via the second portion 299b and changing the output generated by the turbine-generator 251 at step 512 in response to receiving the sinusoidal signal. In some implementations, the method 500 includes de-modulating, by the downhole controller 253, the sinusoidal signal that is hydraulically transmitted to the downhole sub-system 250 via the second portion 299b. At step 516, the downhole controller 253 transmits a signal to control another component of the downhole sub-system 250 (such as the circulation valve 252 or another component of the downhole toolstring) in response to receiving the output from the turbine-generator 251 at step 514. Power generation by the turbine-generator 251 remains steady throughout steps 512, 514, and 516.
In some implementations, the downhole sub-system 250 includes a circulation valve (such as the circulation valve 252) downstream of the turbine-generator 251 and communicatively coupled to the downhole controller 253. In some implementations, the method 500 includes processing, by the downhole controller 253, the change in the output, for example, generated by the turbine-generator 251 at step 512 in response to receiving the sinusoidal signal. In some implementations, the method 500 includes adjusting, by the downhole controller 253, fluid flow through the circulation valve 252 at least based on the processing of the change in the output, for example, generated by the turbine-generator 251 at step 512 in response to receiving the sinusoidal signal. In some implementations, processing, by the downhole controller 253, the change in the output includes processing the change in the output, such that the power output of the turbine-generator 251 is maintained to be greater than a minimum power output threshold.
The controller 600 includes a processor 605. Although illustrated as a single processor 605 in
The controller 600 can also include a database 606 that can hold data for the controller 600 or other components (or a combination of both) that can be connected to the network. Although illustrated as a single database 606 in
The controller 600 includes a memory 607 that can hold data for the controller 600 or other components (or a combination of both) that can be connected to the network. Although illustrated as a single memory 607 in
The memory 607 stores controller-readable instructions executable by the processor 605 that, when executed, cause the processor 605 to perform operations, such as adjust fluid flow through each of the first and second dump valves 221a, 221b. The controller 600 can also include a power supply 614. The power supply 614 can include a rechargeable or non-rechargeable battery that can be configured to be either user- or non-user-replaceable. The power supply 614 can be hard-wired. There may be any number of controllers 600 associated with, or external to, a computer system containing controller 600, each controller 600 communicating over the network. Further, the term “client,” “user,” “operator,” and other appropriate terminology may be used interchangeably, as appropriate, without departing from this specification. Moreover, this specification contemplates that many users may use one controller 600, or that one user may use multiple controllers 600.
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular implementations. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented, in combination, in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations, separately, or in any sub-combination. Moreover, although previously described features may be described as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
As used in this disclosure, the terms “a,” “an,” or “the” are used to include one or more than one unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive “or” unless otherwise indicated. The statement “at least one of A and B” has the same meaning as “A, B, or A and B.” In addition, it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed in this disclosure, and not otherwise defined, is for the purpose of description only and not of limitation. Any use of section headings is intended to aid reading of the document and is not to be interpreted as limiting; information that is relevant to a section heading may occur within or outside of that particular section.
As used in this disclosure, the term “about” or “approximately” can allow for a degree of variability in a value or range, for example, within 10%, within 5%, or within 1% of a stated value or of a stated limit of a range.
As used in this disclosure, the term “substantially” refers to a majority of, or mostly, as in at least about 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, 99.99%, or at least about 99.999% or more.
Values expressed in a range format should be interpreted in a flexible manner to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. For example, a range of “0.1% to about 5%” or “0.1% to 5%” should be interpreted to include about 0.1% to about 5%, as well as the individual values (for example, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) and the sub-ranges (for example, 0.1% to 0.5%, 1.1% to 2.2%, 3.3% to 4.4%) within the indicated range. The statement “X to Y” has the same meaning as “about X to about Y,” unless indicated otherwise. Likewise, the statement “X, Y, or Z” has the same meaning as “about X, about Y, or about Z,” unless indicated otherwise.
Particular implementations of the subject matter have been described. Other implementations, alterations, and permutations of the described implementations are within the scope of the following claims as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. While operations are depicted in the drawings or claims in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed (some operations may be considered optional), to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking or parallel processing (or a combination of multitasking and parallel processing) may be advantageous and performed as deemed appropriate.
Moreover, the separation or integration of various system modules and components in the previously described implementations should not be understood as requiring such separation or integration in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described components and systems can generally be integrated together or packaged into multiple products.
Accordingly, the previously described example implementations do not define or constrain the present disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2643723 | Lynes | Jun 1953 | A |
3175618 | Lang et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3448305 | Raynal et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3558936 | Horan | Jan 1971 | A |
3663845 | Apstein | May 1972 | A |
3916999 | Ellis et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3918520 | Hutchison | Nov 1975 | A |
3970877 | Russell et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4387318 | Kolm et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4536674 | Schmidt | Aug 1985 | A |
4685523 | Paschal, Jr. et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5092176 | Buttram et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5113379 | Scherbatskoy | May 1992 | A |
5150619 | Turner | Sep 1992 | A |
5224182 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5301760 | Graham | Apr 1994 | A |
5317223 | Kiesewetter et al. | May 1994 | A |
5375622 | Houston | Dec 1994 | A |
5448227 | Orban et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5566762 | Braddick et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5613555 | Sorem et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5708500 | Anderson | Jan 1998 | A |
5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5965964 | Skinner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975205 | Carisella | Nov 1999 | A |
6044906 | Saltel | Apr 2000 | A |
6068015 | Pringle | May 2000 | A |
6082455 | Pringle et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6193079 | Weimer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209652 | Portman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6349768 | Leising | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6504258 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6578638 | Guillory et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6588266 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6728165 | Roscigno et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6768214 | Schultz et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779601 | Wilson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6913079 | Tubel | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920085 | Finke et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7198102 | Virally | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7199480 | Fripp et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224077 | Allen | May 2007 | B2 |
7242103 | Tips | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249805 | Cap | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7345372 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7397388 | Huang et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410003 | Ravensbergen et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7668411 | Davies et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7847421 | Gardner et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7906861 | Guerrero et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7946341 | Hartog et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7980309 | Crawford | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8047232 | Bernitsas | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8258644 | Kaplan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8408064 | Hartog et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8421251 | Pabon et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8426988 | Hay | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8493556 | Li et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8564179 | Ochoa et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8604634 | Pabon et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8638002 | Lu | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8648480 | Liu et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8681000 | August et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8786113 | Tinnen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792304 | Sugiura | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8916983 | Marya et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8925649 | Wiebe et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8941384 | Prammer | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8948550 | Li et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9026376 | Volker et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9091144 | Swanson et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9106159 | Wiebe et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9130161 | Nair et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9140815 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9170149 | Hartog et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9239043 | Zeas | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9321222 | Childers et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9322389 | Tosi | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9499460 | Kawamura et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9574420 | Hall et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9581489 | Skinner | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9599460 | Wang et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9599505 | Lagakos et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9605535 | Logan et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9617847 | Jaaskelainen et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9638671 | Borigo et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9759556 | Davis et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9784077 | Gorrara | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9803976 | Simonetti et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9828853 | Chambers | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10115942 | Qiao et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10209383 | Barfoot et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10253615 | Hunter et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10367434 | Ahmad | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20020043404 | Trueman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20060042792 | Connell | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060086498 | Wetzel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070012437 | Clingman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070181304 | Rankin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080048455 | Carney | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080100828 | Cyr et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080277941 | Bowles | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296067 | Haughom | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090107725 | Christy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090166045 | Wetzel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100164231 | Tsou | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100308592 | Frayne | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110049901 | Tinnen | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088462 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110273032 | Lu | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120018143 | Lembcke | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120211245 | Fuhst et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120292915 | Moon | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130068481 | Zhou | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130091942 | Samson et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119669 | Murphree | May 2013 | A1 |
20130167628 | Hull et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130200628 | Kane | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227940 | Greenblatt | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130234859 | Picioreanu et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140167418 | Hiejima | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175800 | Thorp | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140284937 | Dudley et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140311737 | Bedouet et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150053009 | Yan et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150060083 | Romer et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150114127 | Barfoot et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150318920 | Johnston | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160168957 | Tubel | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160177659 | Voll et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160273947 | Mu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160333670 | Tegeler | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170033713 | Petroni | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170075029 | Cuny et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170235006 | Ellmauthaler et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170260846 | Jin et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180045543 | Farhadiroushan et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180052041 | Yaman et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180155991 | Arsalan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180274311 | Zsolt | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180351480 | Ahmad | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190025095 | Steel | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190049054 | Gunnarsson | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190055792 | Sui et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190128113 | Ross et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190253003 | Ahmad | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253004 | Ahmad | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253005 | Ahmad | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253006 | Ahmad | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190376371 | Arsalan | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200270983 | Hallunbaek et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200310389 | Han et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200370426 | Dugas | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210348508 | Greci | Nov 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101592475 | Dec 2009 | CN |
201496028 | Jun 2010 | CN |
102471701 | May 2012 | CN |
101488805 | Aug 2012 | CN |
103913186 | Jul 2014 | CN |
105043586 | Nov 2015 | CN |
107144339 | Sep 2017 | CN |
206496768 | Sep 2017 | CN |
105371943 | Jun 2018 | CN |
108534910 | Sep 2018 | CN |
202012103729 | Oct 2012 | DE |
0380148 | Aug 1990 | EP |
2218721 | Nov 1989 | GB |
2010156172 | Jul 2010 | JP |
WO 1993006331 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 2009046709 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2014116458 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO 2015073018 | May 2015 | WO |
WO 2016111849 | Jul 2016 | WO |
WO 2016130620 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2017146593 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2018125071 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO 2018145215 | Aug 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bao et al., “Recent development in the distributed fiber optic acoustic and ultrasonic detection,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, Aug. 15, 2017, 35:16 (3256-3267), 12 pages. |
Bybee et al., “Through-Tubing Completions Maximize Production,” SPE-0206-0057, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Drilling and Cementing Technology, JPT, Feb. 2006, 2 pages. |
Chen et al., “Distributed acoustic sensor based on two-mode fiber,” Optics Express 25399, Optics Express, Sep. 2018, 26:19, 9 pages. |
Cox et al., “Realistic Assessment of Proppant Pack Conductivity for Material Section,” SPE-84306-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Annual Technical Conference, Oct. 5-8, 2003, 12 pages. |
Fornarelli et al., “Flow patterns and heat transfer around six in-line circular cylinders at low Reynolds number,” JP Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Pushpa Publishing House, Allahabad, India, Feb. 2015, 11:1 (1-28), 28 pages. |
Gillard et al., “A New Approach to Generating Fracture Conductivity,” SPE-135034-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 19-22, 2010, 14 pages. |
Gomaa et al., “Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied To Investigate Development and Optimization of Highly Conductive Channels within the Fracture Geometry,” SPE-179143-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE Production & Operations, 32:04, Nov. 2017, 12 pages. |
Gomaa et al., “Improving Fracture Conductivity by Developing and Optimizing a Channels Within the Fracture Geometry: CFD Study,” SPE-178982-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Feb. 24-26, 2016, 25 pages. |
Govardhan et al., “Critical mass in vortex-induced vibration of a cylinder,” European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids, Jan.-Feb. 2004, 23:1 (17-27), 11 pages. |
Huthwaite, “Evaluation of inversion approaches for guided wave thickness mapping,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Mar. 2014, 470:20140063, 28 pages. |
Huthwaite, “Improving accuracy through density correction in guided wave tomography,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Jan. 2016, 472:20150832, 25 pages. |
Juarez and Taylor, “Field test of a distributed fiber-optic intrusion sensor system for long perimeters,” Applied Optics, Apr. 10, 2007, 46:11 (1968-1971), 4 pages. |
Keiser, “Optical fiber communications,” McGraw Hill, 2008, 26-57, 16 pages. |
Kern et al., “Propping Fractures With Aluminum Particles,” SPE-1573-G-PA, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Journal of Per. Technology, Jun. 1961, 13:6 (583-589), 7 pages. |
Meyer et al., “Theoretical Foundation and Design Formulae for Channel and Pillar Type Propped Fractures—A Method to Increase Fracture Conductivity,” SPE-170781-MS, Society Of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Oct. 27-29, 2014, 25 pages. |
Palisch et al., “Determining Realistic Fracture Conductivity and Understanding its Impact on Well Performance—Theory and Field Examples,” SPE-106301-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2007 SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, College Station, Texas, Jan. 29-31, 2007, 13 pages. |
Petrowiki.spe.org (online), “Scale Problems in Production,” available on or before Jan. 15, 2018, retrieved on Feb. 16, 2021, retrieved from URL <https://petrowiki.spe.org/Scale_problems_in_production>, 15 pages. |
Poollen et al., “Hydraulic Fracturing—FractureFlow Capacity vs Well Productivity,” SPE-890-G, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at 32nd Annual Fall Meeting of Society of Petroleum Engineers, Oct. 6-9, 1957, published as Petroleum Transactions AIME 213, 1958, 5 pages. |
Poollen, “Productivity vs Permeability Damage in Hydraulically Produced Fractures,” Paper 906-2-G, American Petroleum Institute, presented at Drilling and Production Practice, Jan. 1, 1957, 8 pages. |
Qin et al., “Signal-to-Noise Ratio Enhancement Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition in Phase-Sensitive Optical Time Domain Reflectometry Systems,” Sensors, MDPI, Aug. 14, 2017, 17:1870, 10 pages. |
Rao et al., “Guided Wave Tomography Based on Full Waveform Inversion,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, May 2016, 63:5, 9 pages. |
Rao et al., “Guided Wave Tomography Based on Full Waveform Inversion,” Manuscript, The School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technology University, Feb. 26, 2016, 33 pages. |
Saeed et al., “Innovative Permanent Down-Hole Scale and Corrosion Monitoring SystemUsing Ultrasound Guided Waves Technology,” SPE-198609-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Gas & Oil Technology Showcase and Conference, Dubai, UAE, Oct. 21-23, 2019, 10 pages. |
Stalford et al., “Literature Survey and Background Studies Report (Task V),” Document No. 10121.4504.01.01, Intelligent Casing-Intelligent Formation Telemetry (ICIFT) System, Research Partnership of Secure Energy for America (RPSEA), Jul. 15, 2014, 90 pages. |
Tinsley and Williams, “A new method for providing increased fracture conductivity and improving stimulation results,” SPE-4676-PA, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Journal of Petroleum Technology, Nov. 1975, 27:11 (1319-1325), 7 pages. |
Vincent, “Examining Our Assumptions—Have Oversimplifications Jeopardizedour Ability To Design Optimal Fracture Treatments,” SPE-119143-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, the Woodlands, Texas, Jan. 19-21, 2009, 51 pages. |
Vincent, “Five Things You Didn't Want to Know about Hydraulic Fractures,” ISRM-ICHF-2013-045, presented at the International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing: An ISRM specialized Conference, May 20-22, 2013, 14 pages. |
Vysloukh, “Chapter 8: Stimulated Raman Scattering,” in Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 1990, 298-302, 5 pages. |
Walker et al., “Proppants, We Still Don't Need No Proppants—A Perspective of Several Operators,” SPE-38611-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, Sep. 27-30, 1995, 8 pages. |
Wang et al., “Rayleigh scattering in few-mode optical fibers,” Scientific reports, Oct. 2016, 6:35844 (1-8), 8 pages. |
Yamate et al., “Optical sensors for the exploration of oil and gas,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, Aug. 15, 2017, 35:16 (3538-3545), 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/16967, dated May 16, 2022, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220259950 A1 | Aug 2022 | US |