A centralized radio access network (C-RAN) can be used to implement base station functionality for providing wireless service to user equipment (UE). Typically, for each cell implemented by the C-RAN, one or more baseband units (BBUs) (also referred to here as “baseband controllers”) interact with multiple remote units (also referred to here as “radio points” or “RPs”). Each BBU is coupled to the radio points over front-haul communication links or a front-haul network.
Downlink user data is scheduled for wireless transmission to each UE. When a C-RAN is used, the downlink user data can be simulcast to a set of radio points of the C-RAN. This set of radio points is also referred to here as the “simulcast zone” for the UE. The respective simulcast zone can vary from UE to UE. The downlink user data for each UE must be communicated from each relevant BBU over the front-haul to each radio point in that UE's simulcast zone.
Where a C-RAN is used to provide Long Term Evolution (LTE) wireless service, downlink user data scheduled for wireless transmission to each UE is communicated over the front-haul in transport blocks (TBs). The front-haul can be implemented using a switched Ethernet network.
One way that downlink user data can be communicated to the radio points over the front-haul is by fragmenting the TBs into a sequence of packets and broadcasting each such packet to all of the radio points. That is, each such packet contains an Internet Protocol (IP) destination address header indicating to the front-haul Ethernet switches to forward each packet to all radio points of the C-RAN. Broadcast is inefficient because all RPs receive packets containing downlink user data for all UEs, even if a given RP is not in the simulcast zone of a given UE. That is, each RP will receive packets containing downlink user data that the RP does not need. This can unnecessarily increase the bandwidth requirements for front-haul Ethernet links that terminate at the RPs and possibly for Ethernet links in nearby switches.
In one example, 20 MHz LTE bandwidth requiring 200 megabits-per-second (Mbps) of front-haul bandwidth is used for each downlink carrier. In such an example, each RP supports 4 downlink carriers, and the C-RAN supports downlink frequency reuse where each downlink frequency can be reused four times within the cell. In such an example, a front-haul Ethernet bandwidth of about 4×4×200 Mbps=3200 Mbps is required at each RP, even though each RP will actually use at most 800 Mbps of this bandwidth. (In this example, each RP supports at most 4 downlink carriers even if downlink reuse is being used in the cell.)
Alternatively, bandwidth requirements at the RP can be minimized by using unicast addressing to send packets containing downlink user data to only a single radio point. Each RP has a unique IP address. Each BBU makes copies of the downlink user data for each UE, one for each RP in the UE's simulcast zone. The BBU transmits each copy over the front-haul to one of the RPs in the UE's simulcast zone using packets that are addressed to the RP's IP address. Unicast addressing results in each RP receiving only the downlink user data it needs, but the bandwidth requirements for the Ethernet links that originate at the BBU are increased by a factor depending on the maximum number of RPs that can be included a simulcast zone.
In the LTE example set forth above, if unicast addressing is used and the maximum number of RPs in a simulcast zone is 8, the front-haul bandwidth requirement at the Ethernet link that originates at a BBU supporting one downlink carrier is 8×4×200 Mbps=6400 Mbps, even though the max non-redundant bandwidth at each RP is 800 Mbps.
In comparing broadcast versus unicast for communicating downlink user data over an Ethernet front-haul in a C-RAN, there is a tradeoff between high bandwidth inefficiency near the RPs and high bandwidth inefficiency near the BBU.
One embodiment is directed to a system to provide wireless service. The system comprises a controller and a plurality of radio points. Each of the radio points is associated with at least one antenna and remotely located from the controller, wherein the plurality of radio points is communicatively coupled to the controller over a front haul. The controller and the plurality of radio points are configured to implement a base station in order to provide wireless service to a plurality of user equipment (UEs) using a cell. The controller is communicatively coupled to a core network of a wireless service provider. The controller is configured to determine a simulcast zone for a UE, the simulcast zone comprising a plurality of radio points from which downlink user data is wirelessly communicated to the UE. The controller is configured to attempt to form a multicast zone for the simulcast zone, the multicast zone comprising a plurality of multicast groups implemented by the front haul. The controller is configured to, if the multicast zone is successfully formed, transmit downlink user data for the UE to the radio points in the simulcast zone over the front haul by transmitting the downlink user data to the multicast groups.
Another embodiment is directed to a method of providing wireless service to user equipment (UE) using a system comprising a controller and a plurality of radio points. Each of the radio points is associated with at least one antenna and remotely located from the controller. The plurality of radio points is communicatively coupled to the controller over a front haul. The controller and the plurality of radio points are configured to implement a base station in order to provide wireless service to a plurality of user equipment (UEs) using a cell. The method comprises determining a simulcast zone for a UE, the simulcast zone comprising a plurality of radio points from which downlink user data is wirelessly communicated to the UE. The method further comprises attempting to form a multicast zone for the simulcast zone, the multicast zone comprising a plurality of multicast groups implemented by the front haul. The method further comprises, if the multicast zone is successfully formed, transmitting downlink user data for the UE to the radio points in the simulcast zone over the front haul by transmitting the downlink user data to the multicast groups.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
More specifically, in the example shown in
The system 100 is coupled to the core network 112 of each wireless network operator over an appropriate back-haul. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The exemplary embodiment of the system 100 shown in
Also, in this exemplary LTE embodiment, each core network 112 is implemented as an Evolved Packet Core (EPC) 112 comprising standard LTE EPC network elements such as, for example, a mobility management entity (MME) (not shown) and a Serving Gateway (SGW) (not shown) and, optionally, a Home eNodeB gateway (HeNB GW) (not shown) and a Security Gateway (SeGW) (not shown).
Moreover, in this exemplary embodiment, each controller 104 communicates with the MME and SGW in the EPC core network 112 using the LTE S1 interface and communicates with other eNodeBs using the LTE X2 interface. For example, each controller 104 can communicate with an outdoor macro eNodeB (not shown) (or another controller 104 implementing a different eNodeB) via the LTE X2 interface.
Each controller 104 and the radio points 106 can be implemented so as to use an air interface that supports one or more of frequency-division duplexing (FDD) and/or time-division duplexing (TDD). Also, the controller 104 and the radio points 106 can be implemented to use an air interface that supports one or more of the multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO), single-input-single-output (SISO), single-input-multiple-output (SIMO), multiple-input-single-output (MISO), and/or beam forming schemes. For example, the controller 104 and the radio points 106 can implement one or more of the LTE transmission modes. Moreover, the controller 104 and/or the radio points 106 can be configured to support multiple air interfaces and/or to support multiple wireless operators.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The switched Ethernet network 116 comprises one or more Ethernet switches 118. Each baseband controller 104 is communicatively coupled to one or more switches 118 via a respective one or more Ethernet links 120 (which are also referred to here as “baseband controller Ethernet links”). Each RP 106 is communicatively coupled to one or more switches 118 via a respective one or more Ethernet links 124 (which are also referred to here as “RP Ethernet links”).
Generally, one or more nodes in a C-RAN perform analog radio frequency (RF) functions for the air interface as well as digital Layer 1, Layer 2, and Layer 3 (of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model) functions for the air interface.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in (L1)
Each baseband controller 104 can be configured to perform all of the digital Layer-1, Layer-2, and Layer-3 processing for the air interface, while the RPs 106 (specifically, the RF circuits) implement only the RF functions for the air interface and the antennas 108 associated with each RP 106. In that case, IQ data representing time-domain symbols for the air interface is communicated between the controller 104 and the RPs 106. Communicating such time-domain IQ data typically requires a relatively high data rate front haul. This approach (communicating time-domain IQ data over the front haul) is suitable for those implementations where the front-haul ETHERNET network 116 is able to deliver the required high data rate.
If the front-haul ETHERNET network 116 is not able to deliver the data rate needed to front haul time-domain IQ data (for example, where the front-haul is implemented using typical enterprise-grade ETHERNET networks), this issue can be addressed by communicating IQ data representing frequency-domain symbols for the air interface between the controllers 104 and the RPs 106. This frequency-domain IQ data represents the symbols in the frequency domain before the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) is performed. The time-domain IQ data can be generated by quantizing the IQ data representing the frequency-domain symbols without guard band zeroes or any cyclic prefix and communicating the resulting compressed, quantized frequency-domain IQ data over the front-haul ETHERNET network 116. Additional details regarding this approach to communicating frequency-domain IQ data can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/762,283, filed on Feb. 7, 2013, and titled “RADIO ACCESS NETWORKS,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. If it is necessary to use even less front haul bandwidth, the transport blocks (that is, the underlying data bits) for the air interface can be communicated between the controllers 104 and the RPs 106.
Where frequency-domain IQ data is front-hauled between the controllers 104 and the RPs 106, each baseband controller 104 can be configured to perform all or some of the digital Layer-1, Layer-2, and Layer-3 processing for the air interface. In this case, the Layer-1 functions in each RP 106 can be configured to implement the digital Layer-1 processing for the air interface that is not performed in the controller 104.
Where the front-haul ETHERNET network 116 is not able to deliver the data rate need to front haul (uncompressed) time-domain IQ data, the time-domain IQ data can be compressed prior to being communicated over the ETHERNET network 116, thereby reducing the data rate needed communicate such IQ data over the ETHERNET network 116.
Data can be front-hauled between the controllers 104 and RPs 106 in other ways.
Each controller 104 and RP 106 (and the functionality described as being included therein) can be implemented in hardware, software, or combinations of hardware and software, and the various implementations (whether hardware, software, or combinations of hardware and software) can also be referred to generally as “circuitry” or a “circuit” configured to implement at least some of the associated functionality. When implemented in software, such software can be implemented in software or firmware executing on one or more suitable programmable processors. Such hardware or software (or portions thereof) can be implemented in other ways (for example, in a field programmable gate array (FPGA), application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), etc.). Also, the RF functionality can be implemented using one or more RF integrated circuits (RFICs) and/or discrete components. Each controller 104 and RP 106 can be implemented in other ways.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
For each UE 110 that is attached to the cell 103, the controller 104 assigns a subset of the RPs 106 to that UE 110, where the RPs 106 in the subset are used to transmit to that UE 100. This subset of RPs 106 is referred to here as the “simulcast zone” for that UE 110.
In the exemplary embodiment described here in connection with
When a UE 110 makes initial LTE Physical Random Access Channel (PRACH) transmissions to access the cell 103, each RP 106 will receive those initial PRACH transmissions and a signal reception metric indicative of the power level of the PRACH transmissions received by that RP 106 is measured (or otherwise determined). One example of such a signal reception metric is a signal-to-noise-plus-interference ratio (SNIR). The signal reception metrics that are determined based on the PRACH transmissions are also referred to here as “PRACH metrics.”
Each signature vector is determined and updated over the course of that UE's connection to the cell 103 based on Sounding Reference Signals (SRS) transmitted by the UE 110. A signal reception metric indicative of the power level of the SRS transmissions received by the RPs 106 (for example, a SNIR) is measured (or otherwise determined). The signal reception metrics that are determined based on the SRS transmissions are also referred to here as “SRS metrics.”
Each signature vector is a set of floating point SINR values (or other metric), with each value or element corresponding to a RP 106 used to serve the cell 103.
The simulcast zone for a UE 110 contains the M RPs 106 with the best SV signal reception metrics, where M is the minimum number of RPs 106 required to achieve a specified SINR. The simulcast zone for a UE 110 is determined by selecting those M RPs 106 based on the current SV.
In this exemplary embodiment, multicast addressing is used for transporting downlink data over the front-haul 116.
This is done by defining groups 140 (shown in
The multicast groups 140 can be judiciously selected so that a simulcast zone for any UE 110 can be defined as the union of a small number (for example, 1 or 2) of multicast groups 140. The union of multicast groups 140 that are used to form a simulcast zone for a UE 110 is also referred to here as the “multicast zone” for the UE 110. Example of multicast zones 142 for a UE 110 is shown in
As used here, the “set of multicast groups” 140 refers to a collection of multicast groups 140 that the controller 104 can select from in order to form the multicast zone for a UE's simulcast zone.
In some implementations, a RP 106 can be included in multiple multicast groups 140. In the example shown in
A controller 104 can be configured to form the multicast zone for a UE's simulcast zone by trying to form the multicast zone using various combinations of multicast groups 140 included in the set of multicast groups and determining if each combination results in a suitable multicast zone.
If it is not possible to form a suitable multicast zone for the UE's simulcast zone using any combination of multicast groups 140 included in the set of multicast groups, then an alternative way of transmitting the downlink user data over the front-haul 116 is used. For example, unicast addressing can be used to transmit the downlink user data to the RPs 106 in the UE's simulcast zone. In another alternative, the UE's simulcast zone can be changed to use a default simulcast zone that includes all of the RPs 106. Then, broadcast addressing can be used to transmit the downlink user data to all of the RPs 106.
The controller 104 can be configured to form multicast zones from the set of multicast groups in other ways.
Whether a particular candidate multicast zone is “suitable” can be determined in various ways. For example, a particular candidate multicast zone can be considered suitable if it is the union of small number of non-intersecting multicast groups and it includes all of the RPs 106 in the UE's simulcast zone. Suitability can also be determined in other ways.
Although in the example shown in
The controller 104 is configured to transmit downlink user data to the RPs 106 in the simulcast zone of a UE 110 by making copies of each transport block (TB) for the downlink user data, one copy for each multicast group 140 in the multicast zone. Each copy is segmented into IP packets that have a destination address that is set to the address of the multicast group 140 associated with that copy. Each IP packet is then transmitted by the baseband unit 104 on the front-haul 115. The Ethernet switches 118 used to implement the front-haul 115 forward the packet to only those RPs 106 that are in the multicast group 140 associated with the destination address of that packet.
As a result, the bandwidth requirements at each RP 106 is minimized, with an increase in the bandwidth requirements at the baseband controller 104 that is a factor of the number of multicast groups 140 typically used to form the multicast zone. In contrast, if unicast addressing where used, the bandwidth requirements at the baseband controller 104 would increase by a factor of the maximum simulcast zone size. Where multicast addressing is used, if each simulcast zone is formed from only a small number of multicast groups 140 that is much less than the maximum simulcast zone size, then the increase in the bandwidth requirements at the baseband controller 104 is much less than would be the case if unicast addressing where used.
If the number of RPs 106 in the system 100 is small enough, it is possible to obtain perfect bandwidth efficiency at both RPs 106 and the baseband units 104 by defining the multicast groups 140 so there is a corresponding multicast group 140 for each possible simulcast zone. If this is the case, then each multicast zone can be formed using a single multicast group 140.
As the number of RPs 106 in the system 100 increases, the corresponding number of possible simulcast zones can become too large to have a corresponding multicast group 140 for each simulcast zone. In this case, the number of multicast groups 140 is limited. This is done by constraining each multicast group 140 to contain a small number of RPs 106 (for example, 4 or fewer) and forming larger simulcast zones (and the associated multicast zone) as a combination of multiple multicast groups 140.
The various multicast groups 140 can be determined at system installation by performing a UE 110 “walk test,” for which a SV is determined for a large sample of possible UE positions. At each UE position, for a given multicast group size of N, the N RPs 106 with the largest SV value are identified and a multicast group 140 containing those N RPs 106 is formed. This can be done to identify multicast groups 140 of various sizes (for example, multicast groups containing 2, 3, and 4 RPs 106).
When adding a new multicast group 140, care can be taken not to replicate a multicast group 140 that is already in the set of multicast groups 140. When a new multicast group 140 is added, the switches 118 in the front-haul 115 are notified of the new multicast group 140. After some latency (typically, around 1 second), the switches 118 are able to forward packets using the IP address assigned to that multicast group 140.
The blocks of the flow diagram shown in
Method 200 is described here as being performed for each UE 110 when the simulcast zone for the UE 110 is determined. The particular UE 110 for which method 200 is being performed is referred to here as the “current” UE 110.
Method 200 comprises determining the signature vector for the current UE 110 (block 202). This is done when the UE 110 initially connects to the cell 103 and, thereafter, periodically when the SV for the UE 110 is updated.
Method 200 further comprises determining the simulcast zone for the current UE 110 based on the UE's current SV (block 204). As noted above, the simulcast zone for a UE 110 contains the M RPs 106 with the best SV signal reception metrics, where M is the minimum number of RPs 106 required to achieve a specified SINR. The simulcast zone for the current UE 110 is determined by selecting those M RPs 106 based on the current SV for the current UE 110.
Method 200 further comprises forming a multicast zone for the current simulcast zone (block 206). In general, this is done by the controller 104 attempting to form a suitable multicast zone for the current UE's simulcast zone from the set of multicast groups as described above.
Method 200 further comprises determining if a suitable multicast zone can be formed for the current UE's simulcast zone (checked in block 208) and, if one can be, transmitting downlink user data for the current UE 110 to the RPs 106 in its simulcast zone using that multicast zone (block 210). As noted above, the controller 104 is configured to transmit downlink user data in this way by making copies of each TB for the downlink user data, one copy for each multicast group 140 in the multicast zone. Each copy is segmented into IP packets that have a destination address that is the address of the multicast group 140 associated with that copy. Each IP packet is then transmitted by the controller 104 on the front-haul 115. The Ethernet switches 118 used to implement the front-haul 115 forward the packet to only those RPs 106 that are in the multicast group 140 associated with the destination address of that packet.
As a result, the bandwidth requirements at each RP 106 is minimized, with an increase in the bandwidth requirements at the controller 104 that is only a factor of the number of multicast groups 140 in the multicast zone set, which typically will be a small number.
Method 200 further comprises, if a suitable multicast zone cannot be formed for the current UE's simulcast zone, transmitting downlink user data for the current UE 110 over the front-haul 115 using an alternative approach (block 212). For example, as noted above, unicast addressing can be used to transmit the downlink user data to the RPs 106 in the current UE's simulcast zone. In another alternative, the current UE's simulcast zone can be changed to use a default simulcast zone that includes all of the RPs 106. Then, broadcast addressing can be used to transmit the downlink user data to all of the RPs 106.
The set of multicast groups used for forming multicast zones can be dynamically determined and updated by the controller 104. For example, the set of multicast groups can be updated when the controller 104 is unable to form a multicast zone for a given UE 110. One example of this approach is shown in
The blocks of the flow diagram shown in
In general, method 300 proceeds as described above in connection with
In method 300, if, after attempting to form a suitable multicast zone for the simulcast zone of the current UE 110 (in connection with block 306), a suitable multicast zone cannot be formed for the current UE's simulcast zone (checked in block 308), the set of multicast groups is updated (block 314). This updating of the set of multicast groups can include deleting, adding, or changing (or combinations thereof) one or more multicast groups included in the set of multicast groups.
In one implementation, when attempting to form a suitable multicast zone for the current UE's simulcast zone, one or more RPs 106 in the current UE's simulcast zone may not be included in any multicast group included in that set. Such RPs 106 are referred to here as “remaining RPs 106.”
In one implementation, if the number N of remaining RPs 106 is a multiple of the multicast group size S for the set of multicast groups, then a number M of new multicast groups can be added to that set, where M is equal to N divided by S. Each successive new multicast group is formed by selecting, from the remaining RPs 106 that have not yet been added to a new multicast group, the S RPs 106 that have the best signal reception metric in the SV for the current UE 110. These new multicast groups are added to the set of multicast groups. As a result, a suitable multicast zone should be able to be formed by using the new multicast groups along with any of the existing multicast groups that include RPs 106 in the current UE's simulcast zone.
The new multicast groups can be added to the set of multicast groups if doing so would not cause the number of multicast groups in that set to exceed a predetermined maximum.
If the number N of remaining RPs 106 is not a multiple of the multicast group size S for that set or if adding the new multicast groups would cause the number of multicast groups in that set to exceed a predetermined maximum, any multicast groups in that set for which deletion criteria are met are purged (deleted) from the set. For example, in one implementation, the deletion criteria are met for any multicast group that has not been used to form a multicast zone for any UE 110 within a predetermined period of time (for example, within a predetermined number of TTIs). In another implementation, the deletion criteria are configured so that a configurable number of the least used multicast groups in the set are purged each time a purge operation is performed. In other implementations, other criteria are used.
If, as a result of performing the purge operation, one or more multicast groups are deleted, the remaining RPs 106 can be updated by determining which RPs 106 in the current UE's simulcast zone are not included in any of the remaining multicast groups in the set. Then, the number of such remaining RPs 106 is checked to see if it is a multiple of the multicast group size S for the current set of the multicast groups and, if that is the case, additional multicast groups are added as described above.
Method 300 further comprises, after updating the set of multicast groups, forming a multicast zone for the current simulcast zone (block 316). If a suitable multicast zone can be formed for the current UE's simulcast zone after updating the set of multicast groups (checked in block 318), downlink user data for the current UE 110 is transmitted to the RPs 106 in its simulcast zone using that multicast zone as described above (block 310).
If a suitable multicast zone still cannot be formed for the current UE's simulcast zone after updating the set of multicast groups, downlink user data for the current UE 110 is transmitted over the front-haul 116 using an alternative approach as described above (block 312).
The set of multicast groups used for forming multicast zones can be dynamically determined and updated by the controller 104 in other ways. For example, the set of multicast groups can be updated periodically. One example of this approach is shown in
The blocks of the flow diagram shown in
Periodically (checked in block 402), the controller 104 updates the set of multicast groups (block 404). This updating of the set of multicast groups can include deleting, adding, or changing (or combinations thereof) one or more multicast groups included in the set of multicast groups.
For example, when this update operation is performed, the controller 104 can attempt to purge (delete) one or more multicast groups from the set of multicast groups. This can be done as described above in connection with
Also, the controller 104 can track metrics associated with the various SVs that it determines for various UE 110 (or store the SVs themselves) and then use those metrics (or the SVs themselves) to determine which multicast groups should be added, deleted, or changed.
Other embodiments can be implemented in other ways.
The methods and techniques described here may be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or with a programmable processor (for example, a special-purpose processor or a general-purpose processor such as a computer) firmware, software, or in combinations of them. Apparatus embodying these techniques may include appropriate input and output devices, a programmable processor, and a storage medium tangibly embodying program instructions for execution by the programmable processor. A process embodying these techniques may be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform desired functions by operating on input data and generating appropriate output. The techniques may advantageously be implemented in one or more programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory and/or a random access memory. Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and DVD disks. Any of the foregoing may be supplemented by, or incorporated in, specially-designed application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs).
A number of embodiments of the invention defined by the following claims have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Example 1 includes a system to provide wireless service comprising: a controller; and a plurality of radio points; wherein each of the radio points is associated with at least one antenna and remotely located from the controller, wherein the plurality of radio points is communicatively coupled to the controller over a front haul; wherein the controller and the plurality of radio points are configured to implement a base station in order to provide wireless service to a plurality of user equipment (UEs) using a cell; wherein the controller is communicatively coupled to a core network of a wireless service provider; wherein the controller is configured to determine a simulcast zone for a UE, the simulcast zone comprising a plurality of radio points from which downlink user data is wirelessly communicated to the UE; wherein the controller is configured to attempt to form a multicast zone for the simulcast zone, the multicast zone comprising a plurality of multicast groups implemented by the front haul; wherein the controller is configured to, if the multicast zone is successfully formed, transmit downlink user data for the UE to the radio points in the simulcast zone over the front haul by transmitting the downlink user data to the multicast groups.
Example 2 includes the system of Example 1, wherein the front haul is implemented using a switched Ethernet network.
Example 3 includes the system of Example 2, wherein the switched Ethernet network comprises at least one Ethernet switch that is configured to implement the multicast groups.
Example 4 includes the system of any of the Examples 2-3, wherein each multicast group comprises an associated multicast Internet Protocol (IP) address.
Example 5 includes the system of any of the Examples 1-4, wherein the controller is configured to determine a signature vector for the UE, the signature vector comprising a respective signal reception metric for each radio point; and wherein the controller is configured to determine the simulcast zone for the UE based on the signature vector.
Example 6 includes the system of any of the Examples 1-5, wherein the controller is configured to attempt to form the multicast zone for the simulcast zone using a set of multi cast groups.
Example 7 includes the system of Example 6, wherein the controller is configured to dynamically update the set of multicast groups.
Example 8 includes the system of any of the Examples 6-7, wherein the controller is configured to, if the multicast zone is not successfully formed, dynamically update the set of multicast groups and attempt to form the multicast zone for the simulcast zone using the dynamically updated set of multicast groups.
Example 9 includes the system of any of the Examples 1-8, wherein the controller is configured to, if the multicast zone is not successfully formed, transmit downlink user data for the UE over the front haul using an alternative approach.
Example 10 includes the system of Example 9, wherein the alternative approach comprises at least one: transmitting downlink user data for the UE over the front haul using unicast addressing; and changing the simulcast zone for the UE to include all radio points and transmitting downlink user data for the UE over the front haul using broadcast addressing.
Example 11 includes a method of providing wireless service to user equipment (UE) using a system comprising a controller and a plurality of radio points, wherein each of the radio points is associated with at least one antenna and remotely located from the controller, wherein the plurality of radio points is communicatively coupled to the controller over a front haul, and wherein the controller and the plurality of radio points are configured to implement a base station in order to provide wireless service to a plurality of user equipment (UEs) using a cell, the method comprising: determining a simulcast zone for a UE, the simulcast zone comprising a plurality of radio points from which downlink user data is wirelessly communicated to the UE; attempting to form a multicast zone for the simulcast zone, the multicast zone comprising a plurality of multicast groups implemented by the front haul; and if the multicast zone is successfully formed, transmitting downlink user data for the UE to the radio points in the simulcast zone over the front haul by transmitting the downlink user data to the multicast groups.
Example 12 includes the method of Example 11, wherein the front haul is implemented using a switched Ethernet network.
Example 13 includes the method of Example 12, wherein the switched Ethernet network comprises at least one Ethernet switch that is configured to implement the multicast groups.
Example 14 includes the method of any of the Examples 12-13, wherein each multicast group comprises an associated multicast Internet Protocol (IP) address.
Example 15 includes the method of any of the Examples 11-14, wherein the method further comprises determining a signature vector for the UE, the signature vector comprising a respective signal reception metric for each radio point; and wherein determining the simulcast zone for the UE comprises determining the simulcast zone based on the signature vector.
Example 16 includes the method of any of the Examples 11-15, wherein attempting to form the multicast zone for the simulcast zone comprises attempting to form the multicast zone for the simulcast zone using a set of multicast groups.
Example 17 includes the method of Example 16, wherein the method further comprises dynamically updating the set of multicast groups.
Example 18 includes the method of any of the Examples 16-17, wherein the method further comprises, if the multicast zone is not successfully formed, dynamically updating the set of multicast groups and attempting to form the multicast zone for the simulcast zone using the dynamically updated set of multicast groups.
Example 19 includes the method of any of the Examples 11-18, wherein the method further comprises, if the multicast zone is not successfully formed, transmitting downlink user data for the UE over the front haul using an alternative approach.
Example 20 includes the method of Example 19, wherein the alternative approach comprises at least one: transmitting downlink user data for the UE over the front haul using unicast addressing; and changing the simulcast zone for the UE to include all radio points and transmitting downlink user data for the UE over the front haul using broadcast addressing.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/672,393, filed on May 16, 2018, and titled “DOWNLINK MULTICAST FOR EFFICIENT FRONT-HAUL UTILIZATION IN A C-RAN”, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6711144 | Kim et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731618 | Chung et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741862 | Chung et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6781999 | Eyuboglu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6985451 | Nattiv et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7170871 | Eyuboglu et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7200391 | Chung et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7242958 | Chung et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277446 | Abi-Nassif et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7299278 | Ch'ng | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7415242 | Ngan | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7515643 | Chung | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7558356 | Pollman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7558588 | To et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7603127 | Chung et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7626926 | Abi-Nassif et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7672682 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7715466 | Oh et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7729243 | Ananthaiyer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730189 | Harikumar et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751835 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7801487 | Mehrabanzad et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7831257 | Pollman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7835698 | Eyuboglu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7843892 | Mehrabanzad et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7860513 | Chung et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7907571 | Raghothaman et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920541 | To et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926098 | Chinitz et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933619 | Kim | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934001 | Harikumar et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7953040 | Harikumar et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7983672 | Humblet et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983708 | Mehrabanzad et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995493 | Anderlind et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8023439 | Rao | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8060058 | Ch'ng et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078165 | Mate et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8085696 | Garg et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8094630 | Garg et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099504 | Cherian et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8111253 | Rao | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8130686 | Rao et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140091 | Chung et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145221 | Garg et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8160020 | Eyuboglu et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160629 | Mate et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160631 | Raghothaman et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160829 | Kalenine | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165528 | Raghothaman et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170598 | Raghothaman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8176327 | Xiong et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8194597 | Feder et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8195187 | Eyuboglu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8229397 | Hou et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229498 | Ch'ng et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8259671 | Raghothaman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280376 | Rajagopalan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290527 | Richardson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295256 | Humblet et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295818 | Palnati et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311570 | Richardson | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8326342 | Raghothaman et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8340636 | Yin et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8345694 | Den et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8346220 | Mate et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355727 | Hoang et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358623 | Samar et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8379566 | Gao et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8379625 | Humblet | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385291 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8400989 | Ch'ng et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402143 | Ramaswamy et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8428601 | Samar et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8452299 | Raghothaman | May 2013 | B2 |
8457084 | Valmikam et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8503342 | Richardson | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520659 | Humblet | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8532658 | Knisely | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542707 | Hou et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543139 | Samar et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8554231 | Jones | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8594663 | Ch'ng et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8615238 | Eyuboglu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615593 | Ch'ng et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8619702 | Garg et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8639247 | Ng et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8688809 | Ch'ng et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8693987 | Chiussi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8705483 | Liu | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718697 | Srinivas et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8731574 | Ch'ng et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8750271 | Jones | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8774134 | Raghothaman et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781483 | Ch'ng | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8805371 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8843638 | Garg et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873512 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8886249 | Richardson | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8909278 | Rao et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8942136 | Humblet | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8953566 | Hegde et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8958809 | Nama et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8982841 | Srinivasan | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9078284 | Richardson | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9380466 | Eyuboglu et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9414399 | Eyuboglu et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9877340 | Park et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9936470 | Eyuboglu et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10057916 | Barabell et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10064072 | Eyuboglu et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10142858 | Eyuboglu et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20020128009 | Boch et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020154055 | Davis et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194605 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040022208 | Dahod | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040136373 | Bareis | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143442 | Knight | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146072 | Farmwald | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040224637 | Silva et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050025160 | Meier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050073964 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050157675 | Feder et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050243785 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060056459 | Stratton et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056559 | Pleasant et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060209752 | Wijngaarden et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070023419 | Ptasienski et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058683 | Futami et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086487 | Yasuda et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070140218 | Nair et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070207838 | Kuwahara et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220573 | Chiussi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230419 | Raman et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242648 | Garg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080003988 | Richardson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080200202 | Montojo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080233886 | Kaminski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240034 | Gollamudi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090061771 | Ma | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097444 | Lohr et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090135718 | Yeo et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149221 | Liu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180423 | Kroener | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090180435 | Sarkar | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090265599 | Chae et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276542 | Aweya et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287976 | Wang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300453 | Sahara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316626 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327829 | Yang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011269 | Budianu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011271 | Giancola et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034135 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037115 | Zheng | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100062768 | Lindqvist et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100115367 | Hsu | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118777 | Yamada et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100142494 | Hsu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167718 | Chiussi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169732 | Wu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185911 | Cheng | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100234035 | Fujishima et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246513 | Lindskog et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257419 | Sung et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110134862 | Huang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145672 | Jongren et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170517 | Bakker et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182255 | Kim et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194548 | Feder et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110194630 | Yang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110268007 | Barany et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287791 | Fujishima et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310802 | Song et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120057572 | Evans et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120127947 | Usui | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140660 | Kang et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120147815 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176884 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176966 | Ling | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176980 | Moon et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176996 | Kim et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120189074 | Jin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120195284 | Mann et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120207105 | Geirhofer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208581 | Ishida et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120213109 | Xu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120250520 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120250740 | Ling | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257570 | Jang et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120264470 | Bajj et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120300635 | Jersenius et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300766 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130016686 | Li et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034197 | Aweya et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130095871 | Soriaga et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130100948 | Irvine | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130136053 | Kim et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136104 | Samar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130194985 | Zetterman et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223307 | Ohlsson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223365 | Choi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223391 | Koo et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229992 | Yue et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242837 | Yang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242919 | Koo et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250869 | Eriksson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130279452 | Liu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130294403 | Srinivasan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140003389 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031036 | Koo et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140044057 | Gaal et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140071868 | Bergquist et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086112 | Stern-Berkowitz et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140126438 | Zhu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140161070 | Chang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140162664 | Stapleton et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177506 | Korus et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177549 | Knisely | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140211690 | Nama et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140212269 | Kastner et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219162 | Eyuboglu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140219255 | Eyuboglu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140219267 | Eyuboglu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150011219 | Saily et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150085720 | Gaal et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150172023 | Yang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150193282 | Blocksome | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150256297 | Yang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150304960 | Yang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160037550 | Barabell et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044548 | Choi et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160242147 | Tarlazzi | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160302088 | Eyuboglu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160309347 | Eyuboglu et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160345342 | Eyuboglu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170135121 | Eyuboglu et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170163330 | Raleigh et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170257151 | Lange | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20190037421 | Eyuboglu et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190069190 | Eyuboglu et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190075576 | Eyuboglu et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102340823 | Feb 2012 | CN |
106797641 | May 2017 | CN |
1134935 | Sep 2001 | EP |
2352264 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2787646 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2007027032 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2014124160 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015191530 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2017100096 | Jun 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/032511 dated Aug. 29, 2019”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 16/413,385, pp. 1-12, Published: WO. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Requirements for support of radio resource management”, 3GPP, Mar. 2008, pp. 1-25, 3GPP Organizational Partners. |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception”, 3GPP, Dec. 2007, pp. 1-47, 3GPP Organizational Partners. |
“Small Cell Virtualization Functional Splits and Use Cases”, Small Cell Forum, Jun. 2015, pp. 1-58, www.smallcellforum.com. |
Belhouchet et al., “4G Wireless Systems, LTE Technology, Session 3: LTE Overview—Design Targets and Multiple Access Technologies”, ITU/BDT Arab Regional Workshop, 2010, pp. 1-82, ERT. |
Dotsch, et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Split Base Station Processing and Determination of Advantageous Architectures for LTE”, Bell Labs Technical Journal, 2013, pp. 1-24, vol. 18, No. 1, Wiley Periodicals. |
Garner, “IEEE 1588 Version 2”, ISPCS, Sep. 24, 2008, pp. 1-89. |
Haberland et al., “Base Stations in the Cloud”, Alcatel-Lucent, Sep. 28, 2012, pp. 1-23, www.alcatel-lucent.com. |
Ma et al., “Radiostar: Providing Wireless Coverage Over Gigabit Ethernet”, Bell Labs Technical Journal, 2009, pp. 1-18, vol. 14, No. 1, Wiley Periodicals. |
Zhu, ZhenBo et al., “Virtual Base Station Pool: Towards a Wireless Network Cloud for Radio Access Networks”, May 17-19, 2010, pp. 1-10, Published in: Bertinoro, Italy. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 19803871.3” Dec. 17, 2021, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 16/413,385, pp. 1 through 7, Published: EP. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190357173 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62672393 | May 2018 | US |