The invention relates generally to water runoff handling systems for buildings that include gutters and downspouts. More specifically, the invention relates to devices aiming to eliminate or at least significantly reduce entry of debris into downspouts of such systems, particularly in the context of roof gutter systems.
Various approaches to preventing debris from entering downspouts exist with the goal of avoiding clogging of downspouts and downstream hardware that can occur when debris is allowed to enter downspouts from gutters. Some of these are more successful than others, but all of them tend to allow too much debris to enter the downspout as they attempt to maintain drainage capacity and clog too easily, which can lead to water backup and overflow problems if the guards and the areas directly surrounding them are not constantly cleaned. While it is unlikely that maintenance or cleaning could be eliminated, a downspout guard is desirable that prevents even minute debris from entering the downspout, preserves water drainage capacity with even maximum buildup of debris, requires minimal cleaning of the gutter, is easy to install and remove when the gutter does need cleaning, is safe for hands and gutters, maintains functionality with a wide variety of downspout shapes and sizes, and is functional year round, including through ice and snow. Additionally, it is desirable to have such a guard available in a relatively compact, easy-to-assemble kit.
Embodiments of the invention disclosed herein may include a downspout guard having five walls formed from at least one piece of material having openings therethrough. Embodiments further include two opposed sidewalls including a front sidewall and a back sidewall, two opposed end walls that provide filtration and drainage, and a top wall connected to the sidewalls and end walls and that provides drainage while providing filtration, wherein when installed in a gutter that includes opposed front and back walls connected to a bottom wall, bottom surfaces of at least the end walls engage the gutter bottom wall, and during operation, at least the two opposed end walls provide filtration to block passage of debris and smaller particles to form a filter cake.
Additionally, embodiments of the invention disclosed herein can include five walls formed from at least one piece of a material having openings therethrough and an open area ratio of at least 40%. The five walls can include two opposed sidewalls including a front sidewall and a back sidewall, two opposed end walls, and a top wall connected to the sidewalls and end walls. When installed in a gutter that includes a bottom wall, bottom surfaces of at least the end walls engage the gutter bottom wall.
Further, embodiments of the invention disclosed herein also contemplate a method of reducing debris flow to a downspout including providing opposed end walls, opposed sidewalls, and a top wall of a material having openings therethrough and an open area ratio of at least 40%. The method can further include connecting the end walls to the opposed sidewalls and the top wall to form a downspout guard with at least the opposed end walls primarily providing filtration and the top wall primarily providing drainage. The method can also include placing the downspout guard in a gutter over a downspout such that the downspout is under a center of the top wall and bottom edges of at least the opposed end walls engage a gutter bottom wall, thereby impeding progress of debris into the downspout while allowing water to proceed to the downspout. According to such a method, at least the end walls of the guard can collect particles during operation to form respective filter cakes that further enhance filtration.
Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention. For a better understanding of the invention with the advantages and the features, refer to the description and to the drawings.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a downspout guard that sits over an opening for a downspout in a gutter, methods of making such a guard, and a kit including pieces and/or components to form such a guard.
In addition to the FIGS. included herein, reference can be made to the drawings of the parent application, application Ser. No. 17/662,438, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, for additional views of a downspout guard. For example,
Preferably, the walls of the guard are made from a material including openings. For example, pieces of material with openings formed therein can be used to form embodiments. More particularly, pieces of plastic, metal, or other suitable materials can be used. Embodiments can, for example, be made from pieces of expanded material, such as expanded metal. However, embodiments can also be made from pieces of perforated material, such as perforated plastic, perforated metal, or other suitable materials including openings formed by perforation. While it is believed that any perforation shape can be used, round holes have been found to be advantageous and effective.
Previous embodiments using expanded metal mesh were found to be very effective in actual use. More recent experiments were conducted using perforated materials to form embodiments. As before, acceptable levels of performance were established as being able to handle the flow of water for which the gutters and downspouts are designed, and to trap minute amounts of debris which will then form filter cakes and aid in further filtration. As before, it was determined that an open area ratio of at least 60-65% was necessary to handle water flow requirements. It was also determined that in order to trap minute particles and form a filter cake, the diameter of the openings should be mor more than 0.2″ with a center to center length or distance of no more than 0.25″. The preferred perforation pattern chosen and validated in experiments consists of 60° staggered round holes (or openings) with a 5/32″ (0.15625″) diameter and a center to center length of 3/16″ (0.1875″), which results in an open area ratio of 63%. It is also a very common, standard material manufactured by many perforated metal vendors, making it very easy and less expensive to obtain.
In other words, the finished guard preferably includes five sides or walls, with a horizontal top wall, vertical sidewalls, and vertical end walls. That is, the guard can have two opposed sidewalls connected to two opposed end walls and to a top wall to form a five-sided hollow polyhedron. Thus, in embodiments, two opposed sidewalls, two opposed end walls, and a top wall are all connected to form a five-sided hollow polyhedron.
While in embodiments, each wall can be made from a mesh material, such as a metal mesh or a plastic mesh, other embodiments can use any suitable material that has openings or holes that can allow passage of water, such as wire mesh or perforated materials, and can include any suitable base material, such as plastic, fiberglass, metal, or any other material with suitable properties. Examples of materials in which acceptable performance was observed include expanded metal mesh and perforated metal. Metal as a base material can be advantageous in embodiments for its durability and relatively high strength to weight ratio.
In addition, in embodiments, various walls, all of the walls, and/or portions of walls of embodiments can be made from a single piece of mesh material. For example, the opposed sidewalls and top wall can be formed from a single piece of material bent into a squared-off U-shape. In an additional example, the top wall can be one piece of mesh material, the side walls can each be part of a respective piece of mesh material, and the opposed end walls can be formed from respective pieces of mesh material. In a further example, all walls can be formed from a single piece of material cut to have the top wall in the center with the side and end walls projecting therefrom to be bent down to form the downspout guard of embodiments.
In some embodiments, to avoid possible obstructions such as downspout collars and caulking, at least one notch 103 (
In the five-walled guard of embodiments, all of the walls are important to the operation of the guard to maximize drainage while maximizing blockage of debris from passing into the downspout. The guard can be used with any shape downspout opening, can be used in a gutter with a snug or loose fit, can be held if necessary by wedging an object between it and the gutter, and in gutters with unusual shapes and/or where otherwise is difficult to ensure positional security of the guard, can be held with a retainer engaging the guard and part of the gutter. The guard can be particularly effective when the top wall area is at least twice that of the downspout opening, and when the side walls are about half the height of the gutter.
The sidewalls and end walls primarily stop debris, whereas the top wall provides significant additional drainage area, particularly in times of heavy flow in the gutter, such as during heavy rain. That is, the end walls provide drainage and are responsible for filtration, including both large and minute particles, while the top wall provides filtration, primarily of larger debris, and augments and ensures maximum rate of flow and drainage capacity. In gutters where water and debris can reach the sidewalls, the sidewalls can also provide filtration and drainage. In other words, the sidewalls and end walls primarily provide filtration while secondarily providing drainage, and the top wall primarily provides drainage while secondarily providing filtration, such as when water level in the gutter in which the guard is installed exceeds the height of the guard. Such high water level can occur from buildup of material against the end walls and sidewalls and/or during extreme rainfall, for example. The unexpected and surprisingly effective results are particularly illustrated in
More particularly, with reference to
In embodiments, as indicated above, notches 103 can be formed in sidewalls 102, 104, enabling guard 100 can span obstructions, such as lips of the downspout, caulk, and/or structural or other features or objects in the gutter, such as gutter components or accessories, or a piece of material covering the downspout opening as discussed above.
As seen in
With reference to
Turning to
As shown, downspout guard 100 is preferably centered over downspout opening 22 with bottom edges of opposed sidewalls 102, 104 and opposed end walls 108, 110 resting on bottom wall 16. Preferably, opposed sidewalls 102, 104 at least partially engage respective front and back walls 12, 14. However, while it is preferred that sidewalls 102, 104 engage gutter front and back walls 12, 14, guard 100 is still effective with gaps therebetween and will remain substantially in position in even heavy flow through gutter 10. Because guard 100 does not rely on any downspout insert, downspout opening 22 can be round, oval, or rectangular shape. Guard 100 in embodiments is sized to more than cover any such shape and/or size downspout opening 22 may have. Preferably, for example, top wall 106 can have an area of at least twice the area of an opening of downspout opening 20. Since a downspout insert is not required for guard 100, flow restriction such an insert would induce can be avoided.
Another embodiment of guard 200 is shown in
To resist movement of downspout guard 100 from its position in roof gutter 10, a width of top wall 106 and opposed end walls 108, 110 is preferably selected so that opposed sidewalls 102, 104 provide at least a snug fit with front and back walls 12, 14 of roof gutter 10, but gaps between opposed sidewalls 102, 104 and front and back walls 12, 14 can be present as noted above, with the bottom edges of guard 100 holding the guard in place. Metal base material is preferred since it is typically sturdier, heavier (and thus more resistant to being dislodged by water and/or debris), and has a reduced risk of failure due to solarization as would be likely to occur with plastic base material. In experiments, a perforated material, such as perforated metal, was found to be very effective, the perforated material having an open area ratio of at least 60% derived from round staggered holes of 5/32″ diameter with center pitch of 3/16″.
In embodiments, where additional positional security of guard 100 is desired, such as when a snug fit cannot be achieved with opposed sidewalls 102, 202, 104, 204 alone, embodiments such as that shown in
As seen in
It should be understood that fewer or more retainers could be used as desired, suitable, and/or needed. Likewise, while one object 140 is shown, more than one object 140 could be used and need not be of a same type. It should further be understood that other retainers could be employed, such as the examples shown in
Debris piled against guard 100 can provide enhanced debris trapping and effectiveness as compared to that of prior art devices, as illustrated in
In operation, end walls 108, 110, and, particularly in a K-style gutter, a portion of front sidewall 102 above where it engages gutter front wall 12 can be primary drainage areas, particularly during light to moderate rainfall. When flow through guard 100 is reduced by debris buildup against the primary drainage areas, or when rainfall is heavy, top wall 106 can provide significant additional drainage area. In experiments, the top wall rarely became clogged, for debris will back up quite far from guard 100 in gutter 10, and debris pileup against the end walls could rise higher than the tops of the end walls before accumulating on the top wall. Given the amount of debris that can accumulate before downspout effectiveness is compromised, cleaning frequency can be significantly reduced. In addition, it has been observed that downspout guard 100 can reduce ice formation in a downspout. It should be noted that a portion of back sidewall 104 can also provide filtration and drainage in embodiments and installations where water and debris can reach rear sidewall 104.
Particularly with regard to the embodiment of
Similar methods can be applied to produce other exemplary embodiments above and as shown and described in the parent of this application, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, as well as kits for an end user to complete formation of downspout guard 100. For example, with reference to
With reference to
Embodiments as described herein thus provide a downspout guard that can prevent even minute debris from entering the downspout, allow a larger buildup of debris without diminishing water drainage capacity, requires fewer instances of cleaning the guard and the gutter, is easy to install and remove when it does need cleaning, is safe for hands and gutters, and is adjustable to ensure a tight fit.
The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
316578 | Schumann et al. | Apr 1885 | A |
571711 | Twist | Nov 1896 | A |
1597503 | Andrews | Aug 1926 | A |
2175138 | Westlake, Jr. | Oct 1939 | A |
2532388 | Batt, Jr. | Dec 1950 | A |
2533402 | Schmitz, Jr. | Dec 1950 | A |
2887073 | Thompson | May 1959 | A |
3956133 | Arnold | May 1976 | A |
4253281 | Ruttenberg | Mar 1981 | A |
4936061 | Palma | Jun 1990 | A |
4965969 | Antenen | Oct 1990 | A |
5040750 | Brant | Aug 1991 | A |
5103601 | Hunt | Apr 1992 | A |
5107635 | Carpenter | Apr 1992 | A |
5230798 | Rogman | Jul 1993 | A |
5242591 | Beechert | Sep 1993 | A |
5409602 | Sorenson | Apr 1995 | A |
5535554 | Harris, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536406 | Silva | Jul 1996 | A |
5592783 | Jones | Jan 1997 | A |
5619825 | Leroney | Apr 1997 | A |
5882508 | St-Jacques | Mar 1999 | A |
RE36343 | Silva | Oct 1999 | E |
5960590 | Hutchison | Oct 1999 | A |
5985158 | Tiderington | Nov 1999 | A |
D425182 | Vargas | May 2000 | S |
6075074 | Daly | Jun 2000 | A |
6114414 | Daly | Sep 2000 | A |
6193880 | Bergeron | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6223474 | Kafton | May 2001 | B1 |
6293054 | Cangialosi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6583187 | Daly | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591566 | Rodlin | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594956 | Willing | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6802163 | Hackman | Oct 2004 | B2 |
D606174 | Martin | Dec 2009 | S |
7919002 | Hurtado | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8646217 | Ratajac | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8656647 | Bath et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9127463 | Feldhaus | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9388559 | Robertson | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9416543 | Fox | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9643113 | Farmer | May 2017 | B2 |
10519667 | Ealer, Sr. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
20040006927 | Wickett | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050016078 | Rotter | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050034376 | Pourdeyhimi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060191208 | MacIntyre | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060278573 | Robinson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080229673 | LaMorte | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20130283707 | Ratajac | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140115998 | Horgan | May 2014 | A1 |
20160040820 | Morris | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170058530 | Ward | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20200154887 | Nilsson | May 2020 | A1 |
20200254502 | Hebert | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63232262 | Aug 2021 | US | |
63185392 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17662438 | May 2022 | US |
Child | 18110003 | US |